Reduction of digoxin-induced inotropism during quinidine administration

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of quinidine to establish a CYP3A4, P-gp, and CYP2D6 drug-drug-gene interaction network

The antiarrhythmic agent quinidine is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and is therefore recommended for use in clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. However, as quinidine is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and P-gp, it is susceptible to DDIs involving these proteins. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can help to mechanistically assess the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes of a drug and has proven its usefulness in predicting even complex interaction scenarios. The objectives of the presented work were to develop a PBPK model of quinidine and to integrate the model into a comprehensive drug-drug(-gene) interaction (DD(G)I) network with a diverse set of CYP3A4 and P-gp perpetrators as well as CYP2D6 and P-gp victims. The quinidine parent-metabolite model including 3-hydroxyquinidine was developed using pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies after intravenous and oral administration covering a broad dosing range (0.1-600 mg). The model covers efflux transport via P-gp and metabolic transformation to either 3-hydroxyquinidine or unspecified metabolites via CYP3A4. The 3-hydroxyquinidine model includes further metabolism by CYP3A4 as well as an unspecific hepatic clearance. Model performance was assessed graphically and quantitatively with greater than 90% of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters within two-fold of corresponding observed values. The model was successfully used to simulate various DD(G)I scenarios with greater than 90% of predicted DD(G)I pharmacokinetic parameter ratios within two-fold prediction success limits. The presented network will be provided to the research community and can be extended to include further perpetrators, victims, and targets, to support investigations of DD(G)Is.

Positive inotropic drugs--digitalis

Digitalis glycosides inhibit Na+K+-ATPase in the cells and have been used for scientific studies of cation transport over cell membranes. Furthermore, digitalis has a positive inotropic and antiarrhythmogenic effect. Specific binding sites for digitalis glycosides have been observed in erythrocytes, the myocardium and the central nervous system. Transcellular transport of digoxin has been found in the kidney, since digoxin is excreted by tubular secretion. Recent studies have discovered an endogenous digitalis-like substance both inhibiting Na-K-ATPase and displacing digoxin from specific binding sites at the erythrocytes. The concentration of this component in plasma seems to be higher in hypertension than in normotension. Future studies will have to disclose other effects of this substance in order to evaluate whether it can be used as a drug in heart failure.

Quinidine administration increases steady state serum digoxin concentration in horses

The aim of this study was to determine if quinidine administration increases steady state serum digoxin concentration in horses. Digoxin (0.01 mg/kg q. 12 h per os) was administered to 6 horses for 7 days. Steady state was confirmed by identifying statistically indistinguishable peak and trough serum digoxin concentrations on Days 4, 5, and 6. On Day 6, serum digoxin concentration was measured at baseline and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after digoxin administration. On Day 7, quinidine (20 g at baseline and 10 g at 2, 4 and 6 h) was administered per os and serum digoxin concentration was measured at the same time intervals. Creatinine and renal digoxin clearances were measured on Days 6 and 7. Results indicated that there was approximately a doubling of serum digoxin concentration (from mean +/- s.d. 2.57 +/- 0.96 ng/ml at baseline to 4.28 +/- 1.31 at 15 min and 5.98 +/- 1.21 ng/ml at 30 min) after starting the administration of quinidine. This elevation persisted for the 12 h after starting quinidine administration. Renal digoxin and endogenous creatinine clearances decreased but the decrease in digoxin clearance was greater. Serum quinidine concentration achieved the therapeutic range (2-6 micrograms/ml) in 5 of the 6 horses. In summary, similar to findings in other species, quinidine administration increases steady state serum digoxin concentration in horses and this occurs, at least in part, due to a decrease in renal digoxin clearance. Some of the decrease in renal clearance is due to decreased glomerular filtration which is dissimilar to findings in other species.

Lack of effect of enoximone on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure

The aim of this study was to investigate if the concomitant administration of the positive inotropic drug enoximone (100 mg tid) has any effect on the morning through levels of the cardiac glycoside digoxin in 17 patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV). Plasma concentrations of digoxin were 1.05 +/- 0.37 ng/mL before enoximone, 0.95 +/- 0.31 ng/mL at the end of the enoximone treatment period of 1 week and 0.95 +/- 0.36 ng/mL 1 week after cessation of enoximone treatment. Thus, concomitant administration of enoximone had no effect on plasma concentrations of digoxin while on the other hand the hemodynamics as assessed by NYHA-classification and determination of the heart volume improved significantly.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin

Numerous pharmacological agents have been shown to produce clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. Drugs which reduce digoxin absorption include the antacids aluminium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide and magnesium trisilicate, the antidiarrhoeals kaolin and pectin, the hypocholesterolaemic agent cholestyramine and the chemotoxins cyclophosphamide, vincristine and bleomycin. Certain antibiotics including sulphasalazine, neomycin and aminosalicylic acid reduce digoxin absorption while others, including erythromycin and tetracycline, increase the bioavailability of digoxin in some patients. Capsule preparations of digoxin in solution are less subject to several of the interactions which affect the absorption and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Various drugs induce alterations in the volume of distribution and clearance of digoxin. Cardiac patients receiving digoxin therapy are particularly prone to interactions with commonly co-administered medications such as the antiarrhythmics quinidine and amiodarone, the calcium channel blockers verapamil and nifedipine, and possibly some vasodilating agents. Studies of digoxin interactions have yielded discrepant results, indicating the need for careful analysis of investigational design before arriving at clinical conclusions.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between digoxin and antiarrhythmic agents and calcium channel blocking agents: an appraisal of study methodology

While preliminary screening for interactions between new cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutic agents and digoxin can be efficiently and safely conducted in normal healthy volunteers, it is particularly important to detect and quantify drug interactions in patients with varying degrees of cardiac, hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Much of the previously published literature provides only minimal data to guide clinical practice because of limitations of study design including sample size and measurement techniques. Important factors that determine the ability of a particular study design to detect a drug interaction with digoxin include the accuracy and precision of the assay method for serum digoxin concentrations, intrasubject and intersubject variability in serum digoxin concentration, and sample size. The format of the trial (chronic versus single digoxin dosing in cardiac patients; chronic versus single digoxin dosing in normal subjects) and the method of assessment of alterations in digoxin handling (formal determination of digoxin clearance, comparison of multiple or single digoxin measurements during various phases of trial) also impact greatly on the clinical relevance of such investigations. Guidelines for future studies of drug interactions with digoxin in cardiac patients are proposed with particular emphasis on laboratory methods; measurement techniques during baseline, placebo, and active drug phases; calculation of the statistical power of the study; time course of the trial; and assessment of the clinical significance of the findings.

Hormone-electrolyte interactions in the pathogenesis of lethal cardiac arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure. Basis of a new physiologic approach to control of arrhythmia

Congestive heart failure is the most arrhythmogenic disorder in cardiovascular medicine. As left ventricular performance deteriorates and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue become progressively more severe, nearly all patients with heart failure experience frequent and complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias and nearly half die suddenly during long-term follow-up. This imminent risk of sudden death appears to be present for all patients with congestive heart failure; ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and programmed electrical stimulation are not useful in distinguishing patient subsets that are particularly predisposed to fatal arrhythmic events. Although conventional antiarrhythmic agents are widely prescribed as a nonspecific approach to prevent sudden death in these patients, there is little evidence to indicate that these drugs possess clinically important antiarrhythmic activity in patients with congestive heart failure, and these agents frequently serve to exacerbate the heart failure state and the underlying ventricular tachyarrhythmia. A useful approach to the prevention of sudden death in patients with congestive heart failure addresses the reversible causes of lethal ventricular arrhythmias in these individuals. Both experimental and clinical evidence indicates that circulating neurohormones and electrolyte deficits (particularly of potassium and magnesium) interact to provoke malignant ventricular ectopic rhythms and that the prevention of electrolyte depletion and the use of neurohormonal antagonists may exert clinically important antiarrhythmic actions. This physiologic approach may prove to be a more effective means of ameliorating the problem of sudden death than the empiric administration of conventional antiarrhythmic drugs.

Evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between calcium antagonists and digoxin

Therapeutic uses of calcium antagonists have expanded to include not only ischemic heart disease but arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure, and various pulmonary and gastrointestinal diseases. Many patients receiving a calcium antagonist concomitantly receive digoxin. Although the potential interaction between these agents has frequently been investigated, literature reports are confusing and inconsistent. We summarized the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of interaction to help clinicians evaluate the potential calcium antagonist-digoxin interaction.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between digoxin and other drugs

Drug interactions with digoxin are important because of this agent's narrow therapeutic index. Among the drugs that can decrease digoxin bioavailability are cholestyramine, antacid gels, kaolin-pectate, certain antimicrobial drugs and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In selected patients, antibiotics may enhance digoxin bioavailability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabolize digoxin. Antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine and amiodarone, can markedly increase steady state serum digoxin levels. Certain calcium channel blocking drugs, particularly verapamil, have a similar effect. Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs, such as spironolactone, can alter digoxin pharmacokinetics. Indomethacin may decrease renal excretion of digoxin in preterm infants. Finally, rifampin, an antibiotic used in the treatment of tuberculosis, may lower steady state serum digoxin levels in patients with severe renal disease. Physicians must maintain constant vigilance whenever medications are added to or withdrawn from a therapeutic regimen that includes digoxin.

Tissue digoxin concentrations and digoxin effect during the quinidine-digoxin interaction

Quinidine elevates serum digoxin concentration in part by reducing the volume of distribution of digoxin, which implies that quinidine displaces digoxin from tissues. The purposes of this study were to: 1) measure the effect of quinidine on tissue digoxin concentrations, and 2) determine if quinidine alters the relation between myocardial digoxin concentration and digoxin effect on myocardial monovalent cation transport. Eighteen dogs were treated with tritiated digoxin until the steady-state serum digoxin concentration was between 1.0 and 1.5 ng/ml. All dogs continued receiving the same dose of digoxin while nine dogs were given quinidine as well. Quinidine was continued until the serum digoxin concentration had increased by at least 25%. At the end of treatment, the serum digoxin concentration in dogs treated with digoxin was 1.2 +/- 0.1 ng/ml compared with 2.1 +/- 0.5 ng/ml in dogs treated with digoxin and quinidine in combination (p less than 0.001). Digoxin concentration in myocardium, skeletal muscle, liver, kidney, stellate ganglion, vagus nerve, femoral nerve, brain and brainstem medulla was higher in dogs treated with a combination of digoxin and quinidine than in dogs treated with digoxin alone, but remained proportional to the serum digoxin concentration in all tissues except the brainstem medulla. Myocardial monovalent cation transport was measured using rubidium-86. The effect of digoxin on myocardial monovalent cation transport did not increase as the serum and myocardial digoxin concentrations increased after quinidine administration.

Myocardial monovalent cation transport during the quinidine-digoxin interaction in dogs

To study the relationship of the serum digoxin concentration to the digoxin effect on monovalent cation transport during the quinidine-digoxin interaction, we used radiolabeled rubidium to measure monovalent cation active transport in myocardial biopsy samples from dogs. In a preliminary study, we showed that quinidine did not affect rubidium uptake by myocardial samples from intact dogs. Then, we studied four groups, each consisting of 13 dogs, which received either saline, low dose digoxin, high dose digoxin, or low dose digoxin plus quinidine treatment. In these groups of dogs, the following steady state serum digoxin concentrations were achieved: saline-treated, 0 ng/ml; low dose digoxin, 1.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml (mean +/- SD); high dose digoxin, 2.4 +/- 0.4 ng/ml; and low-dose digoxin plus quinidine treated, 2.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml. Compared to control values, rubidium uptake was decreased by 17% in dogs treated with low dose digoxin (P less than 0.05) and by 38% in dogs treated with high dose digoxin (P less than 0.01 vs. saline-treated, P less than 0.01 vs. low dose digoxin). Although low dose digoxin plus quinidine-treated dogs had the same mean serum digoxin concentration as the high dose digoxin-treated dogs, rubidium uptake in low dose digoxin plus quinidine-treated dogs was decreased by only 17% compared to control (P less than 0.05 vs. saline-treated, (P less than 0.01 vs. high dose digoxin). During the quinidine-digoxin interaction in the intact dog, the reduction in myocardial rubidium uptake is less than expected from the increase in serum digoxin concentration.

Influence of quinidine on the binding of [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin by human lymphocytes

To explore the molecular basis of the glycoside-quinidine interaction, the in vitro effect of quinidine on the binding of [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin to Na + K + ATPase receptors on human mononuclear cells was investigated. The maximum [3H]-ouabain binding capacity was 45.7 +/- 9.4 X 10(3) molecules/cell in pure lymphocyte preparations (n = 8) and 75.5 +/- 7.3 X 10(3) molecules/cell in mixtures of mononuclear cells (n = 8). These parameters were not influenced by 10(-5)M quinidine. In eight equilibrium experiments with pure lymphocytes, the dissociation constant of [3H]-ouabain increased from 0.79 +/- 0.26 X 10(-8)M in the absence of 10(-5)M quinidine to 1.56 +/- 0.74 X 10(-8)M in its presence (p less than 0.01), indicating that the affinity of the drug was decreased. Similar findings were observed using mixed mononuclear cells. In five uptake and release experiments, quinidine decreased the association rate constant of [3H]-ouabain from 3.15 +/- 0.36 X 10(4)M-1 X s-1 to 2.01 +/- 0.37 X 10(4)M-1 s-1 (p less than 0.01), whereas the dissociation rate constant was not affected. A therapeutic concentration of quinidine does not affect the number of glycoside receptors on lymphocytes, but it does appear to reduce fractional receptor occupancy by both [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin at lower tracer concentrations. This finding is compatible with the clinical observation that quinidine reduces the distribution volume of digoxin.

Influence of verapamil on the inotropism and pharmacokinetics of digoxin

Verapamil has been demonstrated to inhibit the elimination of digoxin and to increase its steady state plasma level by 60-80%. Animal studies suggest that verapamil abolishes the intropic action of other drugs such as ouabain and dopamine. The clinical consequences of this drug interaction were investigated by examining the inotropic activity of single doses of digoxin (assessed from systolic time intervals), with and without coadministration of verapamil. Verapamil decreased total-body clearance of digoxin from 4.68 +/- 0.41 to 3.29 +/- 0.26 ml/min/kg (p less than 0.001) and increased the plasma half-life of the drug from 33.50 +/- 2.38 to 41.31 +/- 2.27 h (p less than 0.01). Verapamil had no influence on the base-line values of the systolic time intervals. Both in the absence and presence of verapamil, digoxin caused significant shortening of the total electromechanical systole and the left ventricular ejection time. However, compared to control conditions, the decay of these changes was slower in the presence of verapamil, in parallel with the prolongation of the plasma half-life of digoxin. A linear relationship was established between reductions in the systolic time intervals and the computer-derived concentration of digoxin in the deep compartment. These regression lines, which represent the concentration-effect relationships of the inotropism of digoxin, were not affected by verapamil. Thus, verapamil per se had no measurable effect either on base-line contractile function of the heart or on digoxin-induced inotropism. The elevated plasma digoxin concentration induced by verapamil appears cardioactive in terms of inotropism.

Effect of the ouabain-quinidine interaction on left ventricular and left atrial function in conscious dogs

The effect of the ouabain-quinidine interaction was examined in 10 conscious dogs. Left ventricular (LV) pressure, LV dP/dt, LV diameter and left atrial (LA) diameter were measured with high-fidelity micromanometers and sonomicrometer crystals. Ouabain, 0.025 mg/kg, significantly (p less than 0.05) increased LV dP/dt, LV and LA fractional shortening and LV and LA velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcf). In a separate experiment, quinidine was administered as a bolus dose, 3.85 mg/kg, followed by an infusion, 0.28 mg/kg/min. This resulted in steady-state quinidine concentrations that produced no change in wall motion or hemodynamics. When ouabain was given 1 hour into the quinidine infusion, only LV dP/dt increased significantly (p less than 0.05). Ouabain alone increased LV dP/dt 26.4 +/- 3.5%, whereas ouabain during the quinidine infusion increased it by 9.5 +/- 2.3%. Similar differences were seen in the responses to ouabain in the absence and presence of quinidine: LV Vcf, 22.4 +/- 4.9% vs 6.0 +/- 2.1%, LV fractional shortening, 23.1 +/- 4.6% vs 5.8 +/- 2.1%, LA Vcf, 22.7 +/- 5.9 vs 4.6 +/- 2.0% and LA fractional shortening, 21.8 +/- 7% vs 7.8 +/- 3.3%. Thus, in the presence of quinidine the increase in intropy usually seen with ouabain was markedly attenuated. These data suggest that the quinidine-induced increase in digoxin serum concentrations is accompanied by a decrease in the contractile response of the heart to digoxin.

Changes in steady state digoxin pharmacokinetics during quinidine therapy in cardiac patients: influence of plasma quinidine concentration

In seven cardiac patients on long-term digoxin therapy, digoxin kinetics were investigated - in the absence and presence of quinidine - after simultaneous administration of an oral digoxin dose and an intravenous 3H-digoxin bolus injection. From 3H-digoxin data quinidine was found to decrease both renal (from 1.19 +/- 0.35 to 0.86 +/- 0.21 ml/min./kg) (P less than 0.02) and extrarenal clearances of digoxin (from 0.85 +/- 0.24 to 0.49 +/- 0.23 ml/min./kg) (P less than 0.02), and to diminish the steady state distribution volume of the drug (from 6.78 +/- 1.23 to 5.63 +/- 1.64 l/kg) (P less than 0.02). Plasma half-life increased from 51.5 +/- 5.4 to 64.4 +/- 14.8 hrs (P less than 0.05), while urinary excretion half-life increased from 54.4 +/- 3.9 to 78.5 +/- 14.1 hrs (P less than 0.01). Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma and urinary digoxin data showed similar changes during quinidine therapy. Reduction in renal 3H-digoxin clearance occurred at subtherapeutic plasma quinidine levels and was independent of plasma quinidine, whereas reductions in extrarenal 3H-digoxin clearance and 3H-digoxin distribution volume were positively correlated to plasma quinidine concentrations (P less than 0.05).

Cardiac effects of treatment with quinidine and digoxin, alone and in combination

Systolic time intervals (QS2-I and LVET-I) and echocardiographically determined ejection fraction and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening were recorded in 10 healthy volunteers as measures of inotropic effect during maintenance treatment with 4 consecutive drug regimens: (1) quinidine, 1,200 mg/day; (2) digoxin, average dose 0.31 mg/day; (3) the combination of (1) and (2); and (4) digoxin alone (average dose 0.65 mg/day) to provide the same steady-state serum concentration of digoxin as during the period with combination of digoxin and quinidine. The steady-state serum concentration of digoxin during the low-dose regimen increased from 0.72 +/- 0.15 (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) to 1.63 +/- 0.28 nmol/liter when quinidine was added. With the high dose of digoxin alone, the serum digoxin level reached 1.68 +/- 0.50 nmol/liter. Skeletal muscle digoxin concentrations during these periods were 27.7 +/- 8.3, 48.7 +/- 16.2, and 51.6 +/- 23.6 nmol/kg of dry weight, respectively. The skeletal muscle to serum concentration ratio of digoxin decreased significantly during quinidine treatment. Systolic time intervals were significantly prolonged by quinidine alone and shortened by digoxin alone, the latter effect being dose-dependent. Subtracting the effect of quinidine itself, the induced increase in digoxin level caused a significant increase in inotropic effect. When these corrected values were compared with those attained during the period with the same steady-state digoxin concentration but in the absence of quinidine, no significant differences were found. Echocardiographically measured ejection fraction and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening showed trends for similar drug effects, as did the systolic time intervals. This study, performed under steady-state conditions, demonstrates that the quinidine-induced increase in steady-state serum digoxin concentration will, with due consideration to quinidine's own pharmacodynamic properties, be accompanied by increased cardiac effects. This indicates that quinidine is not interfering with active receptor sites in the heart for digoxin.

Effect of quinidine on digoxin bioavailability

To evaluate the possible effect of quinidine on digoxin bioavailability, the steady state digoxin kinetics was examined with and without concomitant quinidine therapy, in 7 cardiac patients after simultaneous administration of oral digoxin and intravenous [3H]-digoxin. In the presence of quinidine, the absorption rate constant of digoxin (ka) increased from 2.72 +/- 1.04 to 3.53 +/- 1.34 h-1 (p less than 0.05), whereas lag time and peak time decreased from 0.16 +/- 0.10 to 0.05 +/- 0.04 h (p less than 0.05) and from 0.92 +/- 0.27 to 0.69 +/- 0.19 h (p less than 0.02), respectively. Predose plasma digoxin increased from 0.41 +/- 0.25 to 0.70 +/- 0.31 ng/ml (p less than 0.02), while peak plasma digoxin increased from 0.93 +/- 0.34 to 1.63 +/- 0.46 ng/ml (p less than 0.02). The systemic availability of digoxin increased from 68.48 +/- 13.35 to 79.09 +/- 14.89% (p less than 0.05) in the presence of quinidine. Quinidine had no effect on the biotransformation pattern of digoxin, as assessed by thin layer chromatography. Quinidine increases the rate and extent of digoxin absorption, and this interaction contributes significantly to the elevation in plasma digoxin during both its distribution and elimination phases.

Digoxin-quinidine interaction in patients with chronic renal failure

We evaluated the effect of quinidine on digoxin pharmacokinetic in six patients with severe renal failure. Quinidine reduced the total body clearance of digoxin from 1.87 to 1.06 l/hour (p less than 0.001), and prolonged the digoxin half-life of elimination from 5.20 to 9.61 days (p less than 0.01). The digoxin volume of distribution was unchanged. Renal clearance of digoxin was negligible; thus, the decrease in total body clearance was due to a decrease in the nonrenal clearance of digoxin. The mean trough serum concentrations of quinidine ranged from 1.0 to 3.0 micrograms/ml. We conclude that in patients with chronic renal failure, the dose of digoxin should be decreased by 50% if quinidine therapy is initiated.

Mechanism of additive effects of digoxin and quinidine on contractility in isolated cardiac muscle

To evaluate the mechanism of the effect of the interaction of digoxin and quinidine on myocardial contractility, ferret right ventricular papillary muscles were isolated and the effects of digoxin, 4 x 10(-7) M, quinidine, 1 x 10(5) M and atropine, 1.5 x 10(-6) M, on peak developed force, peak rate of development of force (dF/dt) and time to peak tension were determined. The addition of quinidine to muscles treated with digoxin increased developed force 18 percent (p = 0.006) and dF/dt 35 percent (p = 0.001) without significantly changing time to peak tension. This effect was abolished by pretreatment with atropine. Quinidine alone increased developed force 35 percent (p less than 0.001) and dF/dt 70 percent (p less than 0.001) and decreased time to peak tension 22 percent (p less than 0.001) from pretreatment control values. Atropine alone increased developed force 17 percent (p = 0.02) and dF/dt 32 percent (p = 0.001) and decreased time to peak tension 13 percent (p = 0.003) from pretreatment control values. The addition of quinidine to muscles treated with atropine or of atropine to muscles treated with quinidine did not significantly change developed force, dF/dt or time to peak tension from values with either drug alone. It is concluded that digoxin and quinidine in these doses have additive effects of myocardial contractility, and that this interaction is at least partially mediated through antagonism of cholinergic influences by quinidine.

Serum digoxin concentrations in atrial fibrillation: a review

Studies evaluating the relationship of serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) with pharmacodynamic effects in atrial fibrillation have important limitations. In general, a poor correlation is found between SDC and ventricular rate, but this is understandable, considering the many other factors that affect conduction through the atrioventricular node. The ventricular rate, although a clinically important and easily monitored parameter, may not always be a good measure of digoxin effect. In certain patients, signs and symptoms of toxicity may develop before the desired decrease in heart rate. The SDC may provide, in many cases, information that cannot be obtained solely from the clinical response, but is of great relevance to therapeutic decision making.

Digoxin use in the elderly

The current extensive use of digoxin in elderly patients with left ventricular failure and sinus rhythm may not be clinically justifiable; in a significant proportion of these patients the frequency of digitalis toxicity may outweight the therapeutic benefits of the drug. When digoxin is used in elderly patients, the specific geriatric pharmacology of the drug must be considered. Clinical benefit should be documented before proceeding to long-term maintenance therapy. In selected elderly patients, withdrawal of digoxin with careful follow-up may be a worthwhile procedure. Studies are needed comparing the relative benefits and toxicities of digoxin versus diuretics in the management of heart failure in the elderly.

Effect of quinidine on the digoxin receptor in vitro

To investigate the basis for a clinically important digitalis-quinidine interaction that is characterized by increases in serums digoxin concentrations when quinidine is administered to digoxin-treated patients, we have studied in vitro the interaction of quinidine with the digoxin receptor. Evidence has been obtained that quinidine is capable of decreasing the affinity for digoxin of cardiac glycoside receptor sites on purified Na,K-ATPase and on intact human erythrocyte membranes. As others have shown, quinidine is capable of inhibiting Na,K-ATPase activity, and evidence has been obtained in the current study that, while quinidine can reduce the affinity of the enzyme for digoxin, it is also capable of acting together with digoxin in inhibiting enzyme activity to a degree greater than the inhibitory effect of digoxin alone. The concentrations of digoxin and quinidine used in this study were considerably greater than their therapeutic serum concentrations. Nevertheless, these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the increases in serum digoxin concentrations and the decreases in volumes of digoxin distribution observed clinically when quinidine is administered to digoxin-treated patients may reflect, at least in part, a decrease in the affinity of tissue receptors for digoxin. The possibility must also be considered that enhanced cardiac effects of digoxin may occur clinically as the result of an augmentation, by quinidine, of digoxin effects, which more than compensates for the modest reduction in digoxin binding.