Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene variants are not associated with clopidogrel response

Association between Q192R PON1 genetic polymorphism and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with clopidogrel: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel's responsiveness may be affected by the paraoxonase-1 (PON1) enzyme encoded by the Q192R PON1 genetic variant. We aimed to determine the aggregated risk of MACEs associated with carrying Q192R PON1 genetic variant in patients taking clopidogrel.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Different databases were searched systematically for eligible studies, and risk ratio (RR) was measured using RevMan software where P <0.05 was set statistically significant.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included consisting of 17,815 patients. It was found that patients carrying either homozygous or a combination of heterozygous and homozygous variants were not significantly associated with increased risk of MACEs compared to the non-carriers (QQ vs. RR: RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.42, P=0.96; QQ+QR vs RR; RR=1.05, 95% CI 0.82-1.35, P=0.70). The risk of MACEs was also not significantly different in other genetic model (QQ vs QR+RR) (RR=1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.27, P=0.30). Further, bleeding events were not significantly different in different genetic models (QQ vs RR; RR=1.13, 95% CI 0.58-2.21, P=0.71; QQ+QR vs RR; RR=1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.81, P=0.73; QQ vs QR+RR; RR=1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.55, P=0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the Q192R PON1 genetic polymorphism has no significant impact on the risk of MACEs or bleeding events in patients treated with clopidogrel.

Clinical and pharmacological parameters determine relapse during clopidogrel treatment of acute coronary syndrome

The therapeutic efficacy of clopidogrel as an anti-platelet drug varies among individuals, being the mainstream hypothesis that its bioavailability depends on the individual genetic background and/or interactions with other drugs. A total of 477 patients receiving double anti-aggregation therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, after suffering a first event, were followed for 1 year to record relapse, as a surrogate end point to measure their therapeutic response, as defined by presenting with an acute coronary event (unstable angina, STEMI, or NSTEMI), stent thrombosis/restenosis or cardiac mortality. Anthropometric, clinical and pharmacological variables along with CYP2C19 genotypes were analyzed for their association with the disease relapse phenotype. Only 75 patients (15%) suffered a relapse, which occurred during the first six months of therapy, with a peak at 4.5 months. An initial univariate analysis identified that patients in the relapse group were significantly older (67.4 ± 11.0 vs 61.6 ± 12.3 years old) and presented with diffuse coronary disease, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus dyslipidemia, and arterial hypertension. A poor clinical response to the platelet anti-aggregation regime also occurred more frequently among patients taking, along with aspirin and clopidogrel, acenocoumarol and Calcium Channel Blockers, while no association was found according to CYP2C19 genotypes. A retrospective multivariate analysis indicated that patients belonging to the non-responder phenotype to treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel were older, presented with diffuse coronary disease, a group largely overlapping with type 2 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and were taking dihidropyrimidinic calcium channel blockers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Association between Paraoxonase-1 p.Q192R Polymorphism and Coronary Artery Disease susceptibility in the Colombian Population

Background

Paraoxonase-1 (PON1), a glycoprotein associated with serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL), has a central role in metabolizing lipid peroxides, exhibiting antiatherogenic properties. The polymorphism p.Q192R has been previously associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) susceptibility and clopidogrel response.

Purpose

We aimed at investigating the association of PON1 p.Q192R with CAD and clopidogrel response in Colombian population.

Patients and Methods

The study was conducted among 163 patients diagnosed with CAD and treated with clopidogrel. The allele frequencies for the PON1 192Q and 192R alleles were determined in cases and Latin-American controls obtained from the public database gnomAD (n = 17,711). Response to clopidogrel was determined by assessing the platelet function using the INNOVANCE PFA-200 System. We determined the association between PON1 p.Q192R polymorphism, increased susceptibility to CAD and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) by using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on four genetic models.

Results

The allele frequencies for the PON1 192Q and 192R alleles were 0.60 and 0.40, respectively. The allele distribution was found to be statistically different from the control group and other ethnic groups. The allele 192R was positively associated with decreased susceptibility to CAD under a dominant model (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.8; P < 0.01). We found no association between the polymorphism and HPR.

Conclusion

We propose that PON1 p.Q192R is a potentially useful marker for CAD susceptibility in the Colombian population and lacks association with HPR under clopidogrel treatment.

Pharmacogenetics to guide cardiovascular drug therapy

Over the past decade, pharmacogenetic testing has emerged in clinical practice to guide selected cardiovascular therapies. The most common implementation in practice is CYP2C19 genotyping to predict clopidogrel response and assist in selecting antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Additional examples include genotyping to guide warfarin dosing and statin prescribing. Increasing evidence exists on outcomes with genotype-guided cardiovascular therapies from multiple randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Pharmacogenetic evidence is accumulating for additional cardiovascular medications. However, data for many of these medications are not yet sufficient to support the use of genotyping for drug prescribing. Ultimately, pharmacogenetics might provide a means to individualize drug regimens for complex diseases such as heart failure, in which the treatment armamentarium includes a growing list of medications shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, sophisticated analytical approaches are likely to be necessary to dissect the genetic underpinnings of responses to drug combinations. In this Review, we examine the evidence supporting pharmacogenetic testing in cardiovascular medicine, including that available from several clinical trials. In addition, we describe guidelines that support the use of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics, provide examples of clinical implementation of genotype-guided cardiovascular therapies and discuss opportunities for future growth of the field.

Cytochrome 2C19 and paraoxonase-1 polymorphisms and clopidogrel resistance in ischemic heart disease patients

Aim: Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) genes are thought to be involved in clopidogrel high on treatment reactivity in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. Methods: A total of 240 patients with IHD were screened for CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (LOF; *2, *3) and PON-1 Q192R. Patients were classified as responders and nonresponders to clopidogrel based upon platelet aggregation studies. Genotyping of the CYP2C19 and PON-1 allele was carried out by PCR-RFLP. Results: Results showed that 14.3% of the patients were nonresponders, whereas 85.7% were responders to the clopidogrel therapy. CYP2C19*3 allele showed significant association with clopidogrel high on treatment reactivity in IHD patients. Conclusion: Result of our study demonstrate that IHD patients with CYP2C19*3 allele can face the problem of clopidogrel high on treatment reactivity in Punjabi Pakistani population.

Enhanced active metabolite generation and platelet inhibition with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel regardless of genotype in thienopyridine metabolic pathways

Clopidogrel response varies according to the presence of genetic polymorphisms. The CYP2C19*2 allele has been associated with impaired response; conflicting results have been reported for CYP2C19*17, ABCB1, and PON1 genotypes. We assessed the impact of CYP2C19, PON1, and ABCB1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel and prasugrel pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Aspirin-treated patients (N=194) with coronary artery disease from two independent, prospective, randomised, multi-centre studies comparing clopidogrel (75 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg) were genotyped and classified by predicted CYP2C19 metaboliser phenotype (ultra metabolisers [UM] = *17 carriers; extensive metabolisers [EM] = *1/1 homozygotes; reduced metabolisers [RM] = *2 carriers). ABCB1 T/T and C/T polymorphisms and PON1 A/A, A/G and G/G polymorphisms were also genotyped. PD parameters were assessed using VerifyNow® P2Y12 and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) expressed as platelet reactivity index (PRI) after 14 days of maintenance dosing. Clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite (AM) exposure was calculated in a cohort of 96 patients. For clopidogrel, genetic variants in CYP2C19, but not ABCB1 or PON1, affected PK and PD. For prasugrel, none of the measured genetic variants affected PK or PD. Compared with clopidogrel, platelet inhibition with prasugrel was greater even in the CYP2C19 UM phenotype. Prasugrel generated more AM and achieved greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms. The lack of effect from genetic variants on prasugrel AM generation or antiplatelet activity is consistent with previous studies in healthy volunteers and is consistent with improved efficacy in acute coronary syndrome patients managed with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength: Relation to high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, genotype, and post-percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes

The relationship between thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MATHROMBIN), genotype and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of MATHROMBIN measured by thrombelastography on HPR and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients during aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. MATHROMBIN, platelet aggregation, genotype, and two-year MACE were assessed in 197 PCI-treated patients. HPR was defined as 5 µM ADP-induced PR46% measured by conventional aggregometry. Both high MATHROMBIN ( 68 mm) and CYP2C19*2 allele carriage were independently associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation ([uni03B2] coefficient: 8.3% and 12.0%, respectively). The combination of CYP2C19*2 allele carriage and high MATHROMBIN increased the predictive value for the risk of HPR (odds ratio: 13.89; 95% confidence interval: 3.41 to 55.56; p < 0.001). MACE occurred in 25 patients (12.7%). HPR and high MATHROMBIN were both associated with MACE (hazard ratio: 3.09 and 2.24, respectively), and patients with both HPR and high MATHROMBIN showed an increased risk for MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.56; 95% confidence interval: 1.85 to 16.67; p = 0.002). In conclusion, this is the first study to demonstrate that high platelet-fibrin clot strength is an independent determinant of HPR in PCI-treated patients. Combining the measurements of platelet aggregation and platelet-fibrin clot strength may enhance post-PCI risk stratification and deserves further study.

The impact of clinical and genetic factors on ticagrelor and clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy

Aim: To determine clinically significant factors which may alter the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation. Materials & methods: The study included 378 patients. All the patients had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation. Platelet aggregation and genotyping for CYP2C19 *2 (rs4244285) and CYP4F2 (rs2108622, rs1558139, rs3093135 and rs2074902) was performed. Results: Significantly lower platelet aggregation values (%agr) were detected in ticagrelor users who carried CYP4F2 rs3093135 TT variant (14.67 ± 5.07%agr) versus AA (22.88 ± 6.30%agr), p = 0.0004, or AT (20.56 ± 6.51%agr), p = 0.0126. Conclusion: Results of the current study showed that CYP4F2 rs3093135 TT variant carriers had a higher antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor, and more frequently had nonprocedural bleeding during ticagrelor therapy, as compared with AA and AT variant carriers.

Clopidogrel Improves Skin Microcirculatory Endothelial Function in Persons With Heightened Platelet Aggregation

Background

Platelet activation can lead to enhanced oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and endothelial dysfunction. To quantify the effects of platelet inhibition on endothelial function, we assessed platelet activity of healthy persons before and after clopidogrel administration and evaluated its effects on endothelial function. We hypothesized that clopidogrel, by attenuating platelet activity, would result in enhanced endothelial function.

Methods and Results

Microcirculatory endothelial function was quantified by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) mediated by thermal hyperemia (TH) and postocclusive reactive hyperemia, respectively, in 287 and 241 relatively healthy and homogenous Old Order Amish persons. LDF and platelet aggregation measures were obtained at baseline and after 7 days of clopidogrel administration. Our primary outcome was percentage change in post‐ versus preclopidogrel LDF measures. Preclopidogrel TH‐LDF and platelet aggregation were higher in women than in men (P<0.001). Clopidogrel administration was associated with ≈2‐fold higher percentage change in TH‐LDF in participants with high versus low baseline platelet aggregation (39.4±10.1% versus 17.4±5.6%, P=0.03). Clopidogrel also increased absolute TH‐LDF measures in persons with high platelet aggregation (1757±766 to 2154±1055, P=0.03), with a more prominent effect in women (1909±846 to 2518±1048, P=0.001). There was no evidence that clopidogrel influenced postocclusive reactive hyperemia LDF measures.

Conclusions

The administration of clopidogrel in healthy persons with high baseline platelet aggregation results in improved TH‐induced microcirculatory endothelial function. These data suggest that clopidogrel may have a beneficial effect on microcirculatory endothelial function, presumably through antiplatelet activity, and may confer additional vascular benefits.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00799396.

Development of a physiology-directed population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model for characterizing the impact of genetic and demographic factors on clopidogrel response in healthy adults

Clopidogrel (Plavix®), is a widely used antiplatelet agent, which shows high inter-individual variability in treatment response in patients following the standard dosing regimen. In this study, a physiology-directed population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was developed based on clopidogrel and clopidogrel active metabolite (clop-AM) data from the PAPI and the PGXB2B studies using a step-wise approach in NONMEM (version 7.2). The developed model characterized the in vivo disposition of clopidogrel, its bioactivation into clop-AM in the liver and subsequent platelet aggregation inhibition in the systemic circulation reasonably well. It further allowed the identification of covariates that significantly impact clopidogrel's dose-concentration-response relationship. In particular, CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers converted 26.2% and 39.5% less clopidogrel to clop-AM, respectively, compared to extensive metabolizers. In addition, CES1 G143E mutation carriers have a reduced CES1 activity (82.9%) compared to wild-type subjects, which results in a significant increase in clop-AM formation. An increase in BMI was found to significantly decrease clopidogrel's bioactivation, whereas increased age was associated with increased platelet reactivity. Our PK/PD model analysis suggests that, in order to optimize clopidogrel dosing on a patient-by-patient basis, all of these factors have to be considered simultaneously, e.g. by using quantitative clinical pharmacology tools.

The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor are antiplatelet agents for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and other indications. Variability in response is observed to different degrees with these agents, which can translate to increased risks for adverse cardiovascular events. As such, potential pharmacogenetic determinants of antiplatelet pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes have been actively studied.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the available antiplatelet pharmacogenetics literature. Evidence supporting the significance of candidate genes and their potential influence on antiplatelet response and clinical outcomes are summarized and evaluated. Additional focus is directed at CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response, including the availability of clinical testing and genotype-directed antiplatelet therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The reported aspirin response candidate genes have not been adequately replicated and few candidate genes have thus far been implicated in prasugrel or ticagrelor response. However, abundant data support the clinical validity of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response variability among ACS/PCI patients. Although limited prospective trial data are available to support the utility of routine CYP2C19 testing, the increased risks for reduced clopidogrel efficacy among ACS/PCI patients that carry CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles should be considered when genotype results are available.

Synthesis of Biologically Active Piperidine Metabolites of Clopidogrel: Determination of Structure and Analyte Development

Clopidogrel is a prodrug anticoagulant with active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit the platelet surface GPCR P2Y12 and thus inhibit platelet activation. However, gaining an understanding of patient response has been limited due to imprecise understanding of metabolite activity and stereochemistry, and a lack of acceptable analytes for quantifying in vivo metabolite formation. Methods for the production of all bioactive metabolites of clopidogrel, their stereochemical assignment, and the development of stable analytes via three conceptually orthogonal routes are disclosed.

Review of clopidogrel dose escalation in the current era of potent P2Y12 inhibitors

Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is associated with increased risk of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Investigators have therefore sought to "escalate" clopidogrel dosing to overcome HTPR to reduce ischemic/thrombotic events. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for dose escalation in the context of genetic determinants of resistance and platelet function data. We will review contemporary clinical trials that have sought to improve delivery of dual antiplatelet therapy to patients with coronary artery disease and discuss the potential of clopidogrel dose escalation in specific populations.

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 influence platelet response to clopidogrel and ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness increases the recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies found that genetic variants such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2C19 and PON1 may influence clopidogrel response, cause high platelet reactivity (HPR) and increase cardiovascular events. However, these studies were inconsistent and inconclusive, especially in the Eastern Asian population. In this study, we investigated the effects of genetic variants on clopidogrel response and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients undergoing PCI. A total of 336 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI were included, 53 (15.77%) of whom were categorized as HPR. Among the 10 SNPs studied (ABCB1, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*4, CYP2C19*17, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ITGB3, P2Y12 and PON1 Q192R), the CYP2C19*4 and P2Y12 variants were not found in our population. The PON1 192Q and CYP2C19*2 alleles were significantly higher in the HPR group compared with the normal platelet reactivity (NPR) group (P=0.033 and 0.038, respectively), while the other SNPs were not significantly different between the two groups. Platelet aggregation of the PON1 192Q allele carriers was significantly higher than that of non-carriers both at baseline and 1 month after PCI (P=0.010 and 0.024, respectively); this was the case for CYP2C19*2 allele carriers, as well (P=0.005 and 0.003, respectively). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) increased with the presence of the PON1 192Q and CYP2C19*2 alleles during 6-month follow-up (P=0.012 and 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, both the PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 variants are associated with HPR and an increased risk of ischemic events in Chinese patients undergoing PCI.

Use of genetic data to guide therapy in arterial disease

There is considerable interindividual variation in the response to antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. It has been proposed that this variability in drug response may be attributable to genetic variants. Thus, pharmacogenetics may help to accurately predict response to cardiovascular disease (CVD) therapies in order to maximize drug efficacy, minimize drug toxicity, and to tailor personalized care for these patients. Although the clinical utility of pharmacogenetics is promising, its adoption in clinical practice has been slow. This resistance may stem from sometimes conflicting findings among pharmacogenetic studies. Thus, this review focuses on the genetic determinants of commonly used platelet antagonists and anticoagulants including aspirin, clopidogrel, dabigatran, and warfarin. We also explore the clinical translation of pharmacogenetics in the management of patients with CVD.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes in patients receiving clopidogrel and possible mechanisms

Clopidogrel, a second generation thienopyridine antiplatelet agent, is increasingly prescribed for patients with recent stroke, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Current consensus recommends co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) during clopidogrel therapy to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal complications. However, studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in platelet inhibition when PPIs therapy is administered to subjects on clopidogrel, which thus increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. There have been recent concerns about the safety of PPIs though the postulated link between PPI use and adverse cardiovascular events has not been well established since evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support such an association. Here, we review the impact of PPIs on clinical outcomes in patients on clopidogrel and the possible mechanisms.

Personalized antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy: applications and significance of pharmacogenomics

In recent years, substantial effort has been made to better understand the influence of genetic factors on the efficacy and safety of numerous medications. These investigations suggest that the use of pharmacogenetic data to inform physician decision-making has great potential to enhance patient care by reducing on-treatment clinical events, adverse drug reactions, and health care-related costs. In fact, integration of such information into the clinical setting may be particularly applicable for antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapeutics, given the increasing body of evidence implicating genetic variation in variable drug response. In this review, we summarize currently available pharmacogenetic information for the most commonly used antiplatelet (ie, clopidogrel and aspirin) and anticoagulation (ie, warfarin) medications. Furthermore, we highlight the currently known role of genetic variability in response to next-generation antiplatelet (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and anticoagulant (dabigatran) agents. While compelling evidence suggests that genetic variants are important determinants of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy response, significant barriers to clinical implementation of pharmacogenetic testing exist and are described herein. In addition, we briefly discuss development of new diagnostic targets and therapeutic strategies as well as implications for enhanced patient care. In conclusion, pharmacogenetic testing can provide important information to assist clinicians with prescribing the most personalized and effective antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy. However, several factors may limit its usefulness and should be considered.

Genetics of platelet inhibitor treatment

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist is the standard of care in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) because this regimen has markedly decreased the rate of cardiovascular events. The substantial variability in pharmacodynamic response as well as the moderate antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel has raised major concerns, since high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity has consistently been associated with increased risk for ischaemic events in PCI patients. Baseline demographic and clinical variables contributing to the observed variability have been identified. Besides this, research within the past decade has focused on the impact of genetic polymorphisms encoding transport systems or enzymes involved in the absorption and metabolism of these drugs. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in CYP2C19 are the strongest individual variables affecting pharmacokinetics and antiplatelet response to clopidogrel, but explain no more than 5 to 12% of the variability in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation on clopidogrel. No genetic variables contributing to clinical outcomes of patients treated with the newer P2Y12 receptor antagonists, prasugrel or ticagrelor, have been identified so far. This review aims to provide an update on the current status of genotype-based personalized therapy with clopidogrel.

Effects of cytochrome P450 2C19 and paraoxonase 1 polymorphisms on antiplatelet response to clopidogrel therapy in patients with coronary artery disease

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet prodrug that is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrent thrombosis in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is suggested to be a rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of 2-oxo-clopidogrel to active thiol metabolite with inconsistent results. Here, we sought to determine the associations of CYP2C19 and PON1 gene polymorphisms with clopidogrel response and their role in ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Clopidogrel response and platelet aggregation were determined using Multiplate aggregometer in 211 patients with established CAD who received 75 mg clopidogrel and 75–325 mg aspirin daily for at least 14 days. Polymorphisms in CYP2C19 and PON1 were genotyped and tested for association with clopidogrel resistance. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) and their epistatic interaction effects on ADP-induced platelet aggregation were analysed. The prevalence of clopidogrel resistance in this population was approximately 33.2% (n = 70). The frequencies of CYP2C19*2 and *3 were significantly higher in non-responder than those in responders. After adjusting for established risk factors, CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles independently increased the risk of clopidogrel resistance with adjusted ORs 2.94 (95%CI, 1.65–5.26; p<0.001) and 11.26 (95%CI, 2.47–51.41; p = 0.002, respectively). Patients with *2 or *3 allele and combined with smoking, diabetes and increased platelet count had markedly increased risk of clopidogrel resistance. No association was observed between PON1 Q192R and clopidogrel resistance (adjusted OR = 1.13, 95%CI, 0.70–1.82; p = 0.622). Significantly higher platelet aggregation values were found in CYP2C19*2 and *3 patients when compared with *1/*1 allele carriers (p = 1.98×10⁻⁶). For PON1 Q192R genotypes, aggregation values were similar across all genotype groups (p = 0.359). There was no evidence of gene-gene interaction or LD between CYP2C19 and PON1 polymorphisms on ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Our findings indicated that only CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles had an influence on clopidogrel resistance. The risk of clopidogrel resistance increased further with smoking, diabetes, and increased platelet count.

Relationships between PON1 Q192R polymorphism and clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationships between the PON1 Q192R (rs662 T>C) polymorphism and the clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A range of electronic databases were searched: Web of Science (1945-2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), PubMed (1966-2013), EMBASE (1980-2013), CINAHL (1982-2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982-2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. The crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Six clinical cohort studies with a total number of 5,189 patients undergoing PCI for coronary heart disease were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism was correlated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04-1.43, P = 0.014; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI 1.03-1.86, P = 0.029; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.05-1.99, P = 0.024; respectively), especially among Asians. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between the PON1 Q192R polymorphism and the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.08-1.87, P = 0.011; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.01-3.67, P = 0.046; CC vs. TT: OR = 2.18, 95 % CI 1.09-4.35, P = 0.027; respectively). Our meta-analysis of clinical cohort studies provides evidence that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism may increase the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI.

Aspirin decreases systemic exposure to clopidogrel through modulation of P-glycoprotein but does not alter its antithrombotic activity

Decreased oral clopidogrel absorption caused by induction of intestinal permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) expression after aspirin administration was observed in rats. This study evaluated the effect of aspirin coadministration on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in humans. A single 75-mg dose of clopidogrel was orally administered before and after 2 and 4 weeks of once-daily 100-mg aspirin administration in 18 healthy volunteers who were recruited based on CYP2C19 and PON1 genotypes. Plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and its active metabolite, H4, and relative platelet inhibition (RPI) were determined. The P-gp microRNA miR-27a increased by up to 7.67-fold (P = 0.004) and the clopidogrel area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) decreased by 14% (P > 0.05), but the AUC of H4 remained unchanged and RPI increased by up to 15% (P = 0.002) after aspirin administration. These findings indicate low-dose aspirin coadministration may decrease clopidogrel bioavailability but does not decrease its efficacy.

Pharmacogenomics of anti-platelet and anti-coagulation therapy

Arterial thrombosis is a major component of vascular disease, especially myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Current anti-thrombotic therapies such as warfarin and clopidogrel are effective in inhibiting cardiovascular events; however, there is great inter-individual variability in response to these medications. In recent years, it has been recognized that genetic factors play a significant role in drug response, and, subsequently, common variants in genes responsible for metabolism and drug action have been identified. These discoveries along with new diagnostic targets and therapeutic strategies hold promise for more effective individualized anti-coagulation and anti-platelet therapy.

PON1 Q192R genotype influences clopidogrel responsiveness by relative platelet inhibition instead of on-treatment platelet reactivity

BACKGROUND

paraoxonase-1 (PON1) was recently identified as the crucial enzyme for clopidogrel bioactivation, with PON1 Q192R (rs662) polymorphism determining the clopidogel antiplatelet efficacy. However, subsequent studies showed controversies over the findings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PON1 Q192R in parallel to that of CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285) on clopidogrel responsiveness in a cohort of Chinese patients with unstable angina pectoris.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty Chinese-Han patients diagnosed with unstable angina pectoris and treated with clopidogrel were consecutively recruited. Clopidogrel responsiveness, measured by relative platelet inhibition {RI=[(pretreatment aggregation-posttreatment aggregation at 5days)/(pretreatment aggregation)] x100%}, was assessed in relation to PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 genotypes. RI values were stratified into four quartiles, with patients in quartile 1 defined as individuals of clopidogrel non-responsiveness. The contributions of PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 to on-treatment platelet reactivity (OTPR) at 5days maintenance dose of clopidogrel were also evaluated.

RESULTS

For PON1 Q192R genotypes, RI values were significantly lower in patients with QR and RR alleles than in patients with QQ alleles (p=0.01). OTPR values at 5days maintenance dose of clopidogrel were similar across all the PON1 Q192R genotypes (p=0.41). PON1 192 QR and RR conferred increased risks for clopidogrel non-responsiveness [OR 3.64; 95% CI (1.21-10.92), p=0.02]. For CYP2C19*2 genotypes, compared to CYP2C19*1/*1 wild type carriers, CYP2C19*2 carriers showed a significantly higher OTPR (p=0.009), and a trend for lower RI values (p=0.06). An increased risk for clopidogrel non-responsiveness was found in patients with CYP2C19*2 genotype [OR 2.02; 95% CI (1.03-3.96), p=0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

Both PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 genotypes influence clopidogrel responsiveness, with the impact of PON1 Q192R mainly on relative platelet inhibition instead of OTPR of clopidogrel.

Pharmacogenomics of anti-platelet therapy: how much evidence is enough for clinical implementation?

Pharmacogenomics, the study of the genomics of drug response and adverse effects, holds great promise for more effective individualized (personalized) medicine. Recent evidence supports a role of loss-of-function (LOF) variants in the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2C19 as a determinant of clopidogrel response. Patients given clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention who carry LOF variants do not metabolize clopidogrel, a prodrug, into its active form resulting in decreased inhibition of platelet function and a higher likelihood of recurrent cardiovascular events. Despite a large body of evidence supporting clinical utility, adoption of anti-platelet pharmacogenetics into clinical practice has been slow. In this review, we summarize the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical evidence, identify gaps in knowledge and other barriers that appear to be slowing adoption, and describe CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics implementation projects currently underway. Only when we surmount these barriers will clinicians be able to use pharmacogenetic information in conjunction with the history, physical examination and other medical tests and information to choose the most efficacious anti-platelet therapy for each individual patient.

Genetic variation of platelet function and pharmacology: an update of current knowledge

Platelets are critically involved in atherosclerosis and acute thrombosis. The platelet phenotype shows a wide variability documented by the inherited difference of platelet reactivity, platelet volume and count and function of platelet surface receptors. Several candidate genes have been put into focus and investigated for their functional and prognostic role in healthy individuals and patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease treated with antiplatelet agents. In addition to genetic variation, other clinical, disease-related and demographic factors are important so-called non-genetic factors. Due to the small effect sizes of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in candidate genes and due to the low allele frequencies of functional relevant candidate SNPs, the identification of genetic risk factors with high predictive values generally depends on the sample size of study cohorts. In the post-genome era new array and bioinformatic technologies facilitate high throughput genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for the identification of novel candidate genes in large cardiovascular cohorts. One of the crucial aspects of platelet genomic studies is the precise definition of a specific clinical phenotype (e.g. stent thrombosis) as this will impact importantly the findings of genomic studies like GWAS. Here, we provide an update on genetic variation of platelet receptors and drug metabolising enzymes under specific consideration of data derived by GWAS. The potential impact of this information and the role in personalised therapeutic concepts will be discussed.

The functional G143E variant of carboxylesterase 1 is associated with increased clopidogrel active metabolite levels and greater clopidogrel response

INTRODUCTION

Carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) is the primary enzyme responsible for converting clopidogrel into biologically inactive carboxylic acid metabolites.

METHODS

We genotyped a functional variant in CES1, G143E, in participants of the Pharmacogenomics of Anti-Platelet Intervention (PAPI) study (n=566) and in 350 patients with coronary heart disease treated with clopidogrel, and carried out an association analysis of bioactive metabolite levels, on-clopidogrel ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation, and cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

The levels of clopidogrel active metabolite were significantly greater in CES1 143E-allele carriers (P=0.001). Consistent with these findings, individuals who carried the CES1 143E-allele showed a better clopidogrel response as measured by ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation in both participants of the PAPI study (P=0.003) and clopidogrel-treated coronary heart disease patients (P=0.03). No association was found between this single nucleotide polymorphism and baseline measures of platelet aggregation in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these findings suggest, for the first time, that genetic variation in CES1 may be an important determinant of the efficacy of clopidogrel.

Pharmacogenetics and cardiovascular disease--implications for personalized medicine

The past decade has seen tremendous advances in our understanding of the genetic factors influencing response to a variety of drugs, including those targeted at treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In the case of clopidogrel, warfarin, and statins, the literature has become sufficiently strong that guidelines are now available describing the use of genetic information to guide treatment with these therapies, and some health centers are using this information in the care of their patients. There are many challenges in moving from research data to translation to practice; we discuss some of these barriers and the approaches some health systems are taking to overcome them. The body of literature that has led to the clinical implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping for clopidogrel, VKORC1, CYP2C9; and CYP4F2 for warfarin; and SLCO1B1 for statins is comprehensively described. We also provide clarity for other genes that have been extensively studied relative to these drugs, but for which the data are conflicting. Finally, we comment briefly on pharmacogenetics of other cardiovascular drugs and highlight β-blockers as the drug class with strong data that has not yet seen clinical implementation. It is anticipated that genetic information will increasingly be available on patients, and it is important to identify those examples where the evidence is sufficiently robust and predictive to use genetic information to guide clinical decisions. The review herein provides several examples of the accumulation of evidence and eventual clinical translation in cardiovascular pharmacogenetics.

Platelet function tests in clinical cardiology: unfulfilled expectations

This review is a critical evaluation of publications in the past decade on the usefulness of platelet function tests (PFTs) in clinical cardiology, in aiding diagnosis, predicting risk, and monitoring therapy. The ideal PFT should: 1) detect baseline platelet hyperreactivity; 2) allow individualization of antiplatelet medication; 3) predict thrombotic risk; and 4) predict bleeding risk. The practicalities of clinical cardiology demand rapid, accurate, and reliable tests that are simple to operate at the bedside and available 24 h a day, 7 days a week. Point-of-care PFTs most widely evaluated clinically include PFA-100 and VerifyNow. None of these tests can reliably detect platelet hyperreactivity and thus identify a prothrombotic state. Identification of antiplatelet nonresponsiveness or hyporesponsiveness is highly test specific, and does not allow individualization of therapy. The power of PFTs in predicting thrombotic events for a given individual is variable and often modest, and alteration of antithrombotic treatment on the basis of the results of PFTs has not been shown to alter clinical outcome. PFTs in current mainstream use cannot reliably assess bleeding risk. These tests have been in use for over a decade, but the hopes raised by PFTs in clinical practice remain unfulfilled. Although physiologically relevant measurement of platelet function now is more important than ever, a critical reappraisal of available techniques in light of clinical requirements is needed. The use of native blood, global stimulus instead of individual agonists, contribution of thrombin generation by activated platelets to the test results, and establishment of a PFT therapeutic range for each antiplatelet drug should be considered and is discussed.

Paraoxonase 1 gene polymorphism does not affect clopidogrel response variability but is associated with clinical outcome after PCI

Background

Paraoxonase (PON) is a high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) associated enzyme with antioxidative and anti-atherogenic property. Its function is associated with coronary artery disease and its activity genetically controlled. We evaluated whether genetic variation of PON-1 is associated with clinical outcome in a large cohort of Korean patients with drug-eluting stents implantation.

Methods

A total of 1676 patients with drug-eluting stent implantation were enrolled in the prospective CROSS-VERIFY cohort from June 2006 to June 2010. We genotyped the PON1-Q192R gene, measured clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR), and analyzed lipid profiles. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis at 12 months.

Results

PON-1 genotyping data were available in 1336 patients. Since the Q-allele is associated with decreased PON-activity, we analyzed the outcome between patients with QQ/QR (815 patients, 61%) and those with RR-genotype (521 patients, 39%). After adjustment for common cardiac risk factors, the QQ/QR-genotype was an independent predictor of the primary thrombotic endpoint with an 11-fold increased risk (HR 11.6, 95% CI: 1.55–87.0), but not repeat revascularization (HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78–1.61). The QQ/QR-genotype was not associated with OPR (QQ/QR: 231±86 PRU vs. RR 236±82 PRU, p = 0.342) but higher small-dense LDL levels (1.20±0.12 mg/dL vs. 0.76±0.15 mg/dL, p = 0.027). The increased risk of thrombotic outcomes was more profound in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients compared with non-ACS patients.

Conclusion

PON1 Q-allele is an independent predictor of worse cardiovascular outcome independent of platelet function and is associated with significantly higher levels of small dense LDL-C.

Personalized medicine: is it a pharmacogenetic mirage?

The notion of personalized medicine has developed from the application of the discipline of pharmacogenetics to clinical medicine. Although the clinical relevance of genetically-determined inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics is poorly understood, and the genotype-phenotype association data on clinical outcomes often inconsistent, officially approved drug labels frequently include pharmacogenetic information concerning the safety and/or efficacy of a number of drugs and refer to the availability of the pharmacogenetic test concerned. Regulatory authorities differ in their approach to these issues. Evidence emerging subsequently has generally revealed the pharmacogenetic information included in the label to be premature. Revised drugs labels, together with a flurry of other collateral activities, have raised public expectations of personalized medicine, promoted as 'the right drug at the right dose the first time.' These expectations place the prescribing physician in a dilemma and at risk of litigation, especially when evidence-based information on genotype-related dosing schedules is to all intent and purposes non-existent and guidelines, intended to improve the clinical utility of available pharmacogenetic information or tests, distance themselves from any responsibility. Lack of efficacy or an adverse drug reaction is frequently related to non-genetic factors. Phenoconversion, arising from drug interactions, poses another often neglected challenge to any potential success of personalized medicine by mimicking genetically-determined enzyme deficiency. A more realistic promotion of personalized medicine should acknowledge current limitations and emphasize that pharmacogenetic testing can only improve the likelihood of diminishing a specific toxic effect or increasing the likelihood of a beneficial effect and that application of pharmacogenetics to clinical medicine cannot adequately predict drug response in individual patients.

Genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions leading to clopidogrel resistance: why the Asian population requires special attention

Ischemic heart disease and stroke are the two leading causes of death worldwide. Antiplatelet therapy plays the most significant role in the management of these cardiovascular and cerebrovascular occlusive events to prevent recurrent ischemic attack. Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug, is widely prescribed either alone or in combination with aspirin as dual antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of vascular occlusive events. The antiplatelet response to clopidogrel varies widely. Hyporesponders and nonresponders are likely to have adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. Some drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole), calcium channel blockers, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (nefazadone), coumarin derivatives (phenprocoumon), benzodiazepines, sulfonylurea, erythromycin, and itraconazole, decrease the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel when administered concomitantly. Decreased response to clopidogrel is common among Asians due to genetic polymorphisms associated with clopidogrel resistance, and it is nearly 70% in some of the Asian communities. It is necessary to study Asian populations, because there are a large number of Asians throughout the world due to increased migration. Current guidelines do not make genetic testing or platelet response testing mandatory prior to clopidogrel prescription. Therefore, it is important for clinicians treating Asian patients to keep in mind the interindividual variability in response to clopidogrel when prescribing the drug.

Personalizing antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the accepted standard for prevention of ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention and has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). There is substantial interindividual variability in antiplatelet response to clopidogrel. Various clinical studies have demonstrated that patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity incur an increased risk for ischemic events. In recent years, several clinical and demographic variables as well as multiple genetic factors contributing to the variability in antiplatelet response to clopidogrel have been identified. We discuss strategies based on platelet function testing or genotyping for improvement of antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and thereby clinical outcome.

Genetic determinants of response to cardiovascular drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To survey genetic variation contributing to variable responsiveness and toxicity to important cardiovascular drugs and highlight recent developments in the field of cardiovascular pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previously recognized pharmacogenomic associations with drug efficacy have been further validated (e.g. with clopidogrel and warfarin) and shown to influence clinically important outcomes. The clinical significance of variants modulating toxicity (e.g. SLCO1B1 with simvastatin) has also been confirmed. The genetic contribution to variable efficacy and toxicity of other important classes of cardiovascular drugs, such as beta-blockers, is becoming increasingly recognized. Prospective trials testing whether the use of genomic information improves clinical care are underway. Guidance based on the most well-established pharmacogenomic findings has appeared in prescribing labeling and is in the early stages of being implemented into routine clinical care.

SUMMARY

Clinically validated gene variants that modulate responsiveness to cardiovascular drugs continue to be discovered and validated. Early steps are underway to translate these discoveries into clinical care.

Influence of the paraoxonase-1 Q192R genetic variant on clopidogrel responsiveness and recurrent cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A poor biological response to clopidogrel is associated with an increased risk of major cardiovascular ischemic events (MACE). Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) enzyme activity is modulated by the PON1-Q192R variant (rs662) and was recently suggested to be strongly involved in clopidogrel bioactivation, but the influence of the PON1-Q192R variant on the risk of MACE in clopidogrel-treated patients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the PON1-Q192R variant influences clopidogrel biological responsiveness and the risk of MACE in patients treated with clopidogrel.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between the PON1-Q192R polymorphism and the biological response to clopidogrel and/or the risk of MACE during clopidogrel administration.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included. In the 12 studies of the biological response to clopidogrel (n = 5302 patients), there was no significant difference between 192QQ and 192QR + 192RR subjects, whatever the laboratory method used (global mean standardized difference = 0.10 [-0.06; 0.25], P = 0.22). Eleven studies assessed the risk of MACE, four using a case-control design (n = 2739 patients) and seven a prospective design (n = 5353 patients). Overall, MACE occurred in 19% of patients in case-control studies and in 6% of patients in prospective cohort studies, with no significant difference between 192QQ and 192QR + 192RR patients (OR = 1.28 [0.97; 1.68], P = 0.08). Similar results were obtained when study design was taken into account. Heterogeneity was mainly driven by one publication.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that the PON1-Q192R polymorphism has no major impact on the risk of MACE and does not alter the biological response to clopidogrel in clopidogrel-treated patients.