Comparing approaches to screening for angle closure in older Chinese adults

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Primary Angle Closure Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in differentiating eyes with primary angle closure disease (PACD) from eyes of control subjects, as well as eyes with PAC and PAC glaucoma (PACG) from eyes with PAC suspect (PACS) disease.

DESIGN

Multicenter cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Chinese patients were classified into control, PACS, and PAC/PACG groups. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) from logistic regression models was used to evaluate discriminating ability. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and performance of the models was validated using an independent dataset.

RESULTS

A total of 2928 SS-OCT images from 366 eyes of 260 patients were recruited to develop diagnostic models. The validation dataset included 1176 SS-OCT images from 147 eyes of 143 patients. For distinguishing PACD from control eyes, average anterior chamber depth had the highest AUC (0.94). With a cutoff of 2.2 mm for average anterior chamber depth, the sensitivity and specificity were 90.2% and 85.2% in the training set. For distinguishing PAC/PACG from PACS, a multivariate model had an AUC of 0.83, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.0% and 62.8% in the training set. The validation set confirmed the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

SS-OCT of the anterior segment showed excellent diagnostic performance distinguishing PACD from normal eyes and moderate diagnostic ability distinguishing eyes with PAC/PACG from eyes with PACS. ACD alone may provide a simple and effective way to diagnose PACD from control subjects. As ACD can be obtained using other more available modalities, this has implications for the early diagnosis of PACD.

Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) accounts for 50% of glaucoma blindness worldwide. More than three-quarters of individuals with PACG reside in Asia. In these populations, PACG often develops insidiously leading to chronically raised intraocular pressure and optic nerve damage, which is often asymptomatic. Non-contact tests to identify people at risk of angle closure are relatively quick and can be carried out by appropriately trained healthcare professionals or technicians as a triage test. If the test is positive, the person will be referred for further specialist assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-contact tests (limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) (van Herick test); oblique flashlight test; scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), Scheimpflug photography; anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), for identifying people with an occludable angle.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following bibliographic databases 3 October 2019: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; BIOSIS; OpenGrey; ARIF and clinical trials registries. The searches were limited to remove case reports. There were no date or language restrictions in the searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies conducted in any setting that evaluated the accuracy of one or more index tests for identifying people with an occludable angle compared to a gonioscopic reference standard.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using QUADAS2 for each study. For each test, 2 x 2 tables were constructed and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. When four or more studies provided data at fixed thresholds for each test, we fitted a bivariate model using the METADAS macro in SAS to calculate pooled point estimates for sensitivity and specificity. For comparisons between index tests and subgroups, we performed a likelihood ratio test comparing the model with and without the covariate.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 47 studies involving 26,151 participants and analysing data from 23,440. Most studies were conducted in Asia (36, 76.6%). Twenty-seven studies assessed AS-OCT (analysing 15,580 participants), 17 studies LACD (7385 participants), nine studies Scheimpflug photography (1616 participants), six studies SPAC (5239 participants) and five studies evaluated the oblique flashlight test (998 participants). Regarding study quality, 36 of the included studies (76.6%) were judged to have a high risk of bias in at least one domain.The use of a case-control design (13 studies) or inappropriate exclusions (6 studies) raised patient selection concerns in 40.4% of studies and concerns in the index test domain in 59.6% of studies were due to lack of masking or post-hoc determination of optimal thresholds. Among studies that did not use a case-control design, 16 studies (20,599 participants) were conducted in a primary care/community setting and 18 studies (2590 participants) in secondary care settings, of which 15 investigated LACD. Summary estimates were calculated for commonly reported parameters and thresholds for each test; LACD ≤ 25% (16 studies, 7540 eyes): sensitivity 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.90), specificity 0.88 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92) (moderate-certainty); flashlight (grade1) (5 studies, 1188 eyes): sensitivity 0.51 (95% CI 0.25, 0.76), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.70, 0.98) (low-certainty); SPAC (≤ 5 and/or S or P) (4 studies, 4677 eyes): sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.70, 0.91), specificity 0.78 (95% CI 0.70, 0.83) (moderate-certainty); Scheimpflug photography (central ACD) (9 studies, 1698 eyes): sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.84, 0.96), specificity 0.86 (95% CI 0.76, 0.93) (moderate-certainty); AS-OCT (subjective opinion of occludability) (13 studies, 9242 eyes): sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.76, 0.91); specificity 0.71 (95% CI 0.62, 0.78) (moderate-certainty). For comparisons of sensitivity and specificity between index tests we used LACD (≤ 25%) as the reference category. The flashlight test (grade 1 threshold) showed a statistically significant lower sensitivity than LACD (≤ 25%), whereas AS-OCT (subjective judgement) had a statistically significant lower specificity. There were no statistically significant differences for the other index test comparisons. A subgroup analysis was conducted for LACD (≤ 25%), comparing community (7 studies, 14.4% prevalence) vs secondary care (7 studies, 42% prevalence) settings. We found no evidence of a statistically significant difference in test performance according to setting. Performing LACD on 1000 people at risk of angle closure with a prevalence of occludable angles of 10%, LACD would miss about 17 cases out of the 100 with occludable angles and incorrectly classify 108 out of 900 without angle closure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The finding that LACD performed as well as index tests that use sophisticated imaging technologies, confirms the potential for this test for case-detection of occludable angles in high-risk populations. However, methodological issues across studies may have led to our estimates of test accuracy being higher than would be expected in standard clinical practice. There is still a need for high-quality studies to evaluate the performance of non-invasive tests for angle assessment in both community-based and secondary care settings.

Combination of Simple Diagnostic Tests to Detect Primary Angle Closure Disease in a Resource-constrained Region

Purpose: To report on diagnostic accuracy of van Herick (vH) technique performed by a vision technician (VT) as well as on efficacy of a combination of vH technique and central anterior chamber depth (ACD) in detection of primary angle closure disease.Methods: Data was obtained from two cohorts; rural clinic setting (n = 111), and rural population-based research setting (n = 888). Van Herick grading was performed by a VT in first cohort and a glaucoma specialist in second cohort. A reference standard four-mirror gonioscopy was performed by a glaucoma specialist in both cohorts. We did preferential sampling. Cut-off levels for vH technique and central ACD were grade 2 and 25^th percentile value, respectively. Data from one eye per participant was analyzed.Results: Three hundred and forty (34%) eyes were gonioscopically occludable. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) for vH test was 0.83 (0.76, 0.9) and 0.81 (0.78, 0.84) in first and second cohorts, respectively. Simultaneous testing achieved sensitivity of 87.8% while sequential testing achieved specificity of 99.3%. Negative predictive value* of simultaneous testing was 98.3% compared to 96.6% of vH technique while positive predictive value* of sequential testing was 86% compared to 49.3% of vH technique. (*at 10% prevalence of gonioscopically occludable angle)Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy of vH grading was similar when performed by a VT and a glaucoma specialist. While test combination was effective to rule in, vH technique may suffice to rule out the disease. Implications of these findings for resource-constrained regions are discussed.

Low Sensitivity of the Van Herick Method for Detecting Gonioscopic Angle Closure Independent of Observer Expertise

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance characteristics of the Van Herick assessment (VHA) for identifying angle closure compared to gold-standard gonioscopy, as conducted by trained observers of varying expertise.

DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

METHODS

Patients (n = 131) from a glaucoma referral clinic aged ≥50 years without prior ocular surgery or iridotomy underwent unilateral VHA by 1 of 11 trained ophthalmic technicians, followed by VHA and indirect gonioscopy by 1 of 15 ophthalmology residents and 1 of 4 glaucoma specialist attending physicians. Observers were masked to others' gradings. Cohen's kappa (κ) assessed test reproducibility. VHA sensitivity and specificity for identifying gonioscopic angle closure were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 62.0 ± 8.7 years, 56% of patients were male, and 84% were African American. Angles were gonioscopically closed in 14.5% of eyes. Moderate agreement was observed comparing technician or resident VHA to attending VHA (κ = 0.48 and κ = 0.56, respectively). Resident and attending gonioscopy demonstrated excellent agreement (κ = 0.94). Sensitivities of technician, resident, and attending VHA for detecting angle closure were 57.9% (95% confidence interval: 34.0%-78.9%), 78.9% (53.9%-93.0%), and 68.4% (43.5%-86.4%), respectively. Specificities were 88.5% (80.3%-93.6%), 88.2% (80.3%-93.3%), and 87.5% (79.6%-92.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VHA, even when performed by experienced ophthalmologists, misses a substantial proportion of angle closure while incorrectly identifying roughly 1 in 8 open-angle eyes as closed. These results suggest that clinical assessment of anterior chamber angle configuration is best accomplished with gonioscopy.

Improving Access to Eye Care among Persons at High-Risk of Glaucoma in Philadelphia--Design and Methodology: The Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project

PURPOSE

The Wills Eye Glaucoma Research Center initiated a 2-year demonstration project to develop and implement a community-based intervention to improve detection and management of glaucoma in Philadelphia.

METHODS

The glaucoma detection examination consisted of: ocular, medical, and family history; visual acuity testing; corneal pachymetry; biomicroscopy of the anterior segment; intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement; gonioscopy; funduscopy; automated visual field testing; and fundus-color photography. Treatment included laser surgery and/or IOP-lowering medication. A cost analysis was conducted to understand resource requirements. Outcome measures included; prevalence of glaucoma-related pathology and other eye diseases among high-risk populations; the impact of educational workshops on level of knowledge about glaucoma (assessed by pre- and post-test evaluation); and patient satisfaction of the glaucoma detection examinations in the community (assessed by satisfaction survey). Treatment outcome measures were change in IOP at 4-6 weeks and 4-6 months following selective laser trabeculoplasty treatment, deepening of the anterior chamber angle following laser-peripheral iridotomy treatment, and rate of adherence to recommended follow-up examinations. Cost outcomes included total program costs, cost per case of glaucoma detected, and cost per case of ocular disease detected.

RESULTS

This project enrolled 1649 participants (African Americans aged 50+ years, adults 60+ years and individuals with a family history of glaucoma). A total of 1074 individuals attended a glaucoma educational workshop and 1508 scheduled glaucoma detection examination appointments in the community setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project aimed to improve access and use of eye care and to provide a model for a targeted community-based glaucoma program.

Five-year incidence of angle closure among glaucoma health examination participants

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To investigate incidence of angle closure (AC) and its associated factors through a community-based longitudinal study over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Japanese residents aged 40 years or over who underwent two glaucoma health examinations held in 2005 and 2010 were enrolled. Of the participants of the first glaucoma health examination (first examination), those who satisfied exclusion criteria such as having eyes with angle closure, glaucoma, incisional ocular surgery, or other conditions that could influence the results were eliminated from the second glaucoma health examination (second examination). In addition to routine ophthalmic examination, a scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer (SPAC) was employed to investigate the anterior chamber configuration. The incidence of angle closure over the 5-year period and its associated factors were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 754 participants of the first examination, 569 participants were invited for the second examination and 331 participants (87 males and 244 females, age: 62.6 ± 12.7 years), or 619 eyes, were analyzed after eliminating eyes matching exclusion criteria. In the 5-year period, the incidence of AC was 5.4 % (95 % CI: 3.5-8.4 %) of participants or 5.5 % (95 % CI: 4.0-7.6 %) of eyes, including eight eyes (1.3 %) with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Eyes that developed AC had a much smaller SPAC grade at the first examination and a greater decrease in SPAC grade than those that did not develop AC, whereas age and sex were not associated.

CONCLUSIONS

AC was developed by 5.4 % of senior Japanese residents over the 5-year period. The shallow anterior chamber and the marked decrease in anterior chamber depth were associated with AC development.