Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab

Retinal Vascular Resistance Significantly Correlates With Visual Acuity After 1 Year of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

To investigate whether the resistivity of all retinal vessels, termed total capillary resistance (TCR), after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment was correlated with the outcomes of patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Methods

In total, 67 patients with nonischemic CRVO were enrolled in this retrospective observational case series. In each patient, we examined visual acuity; central retinal thickness (CRT); mean blur rate (MBR), which represents retinal blood flow velocity; and TCR. MBR and TCR were measured by laser speckle flowgraphy.

Results

During the 1-year follow-up period, nine of 67 eyes (13.4%) converted to the ischemic type (converted group), whereas 58 eyes (86.6%) remained unchanged (nonischemic group). Mean CRT significantly decreased in all groups; however, the mean visual acuity significantly improved only in the nonischemic group. Mean MBR significantly increased in the nonischemic group but remained unchanged in the converted group. Mean TCR was significantly reduced in the nonischemic group but remained unchanged in the converted group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that MBR and TCR were the independent factors with the strongest and second strongest correlations with visual acuity after treatment, respectively.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that measurements of the independent factors MBR and TCR are useful for evaluating anti-VEGF treatments in patients with CRVO.

Translational Relevance

Development of clinically relevant technologies.

Patient-reported outcomes from a phase IV study of aflibercept in patients with refractory retinal vein occlusions

PURPOSE

To determine the patient-centered effectiveness of switching patients with persistent macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) to aflibercept using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ-25).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective study of eyes with persistent cystoid macular edema due to RVO despite regular treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab switched to aflibercept. Three loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept were administered every 4 weeks and thereafter every 8 weeks until week 48. Vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) using NEI-VFQ-25 was measured at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks following the switch. Baseline scores were compared to week 24 and 48 using paired t-test. Relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the study eye and the NEI-VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores was investigated.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with RVO were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 70.3 ± 8.6 years. The mean change in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to 48 weeks was +20.6 ± 5.2 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Score letters and -109.2 ± 82.8 µm, respectively. VRQoL improved significantly, with an increase of mean NEI-VFQ composite score of 11.5 ± 9.5; the corresponding improvements in near and distant activities were 13.3 ± 19.4 and 8.4 ± 10.4, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that BCVA gain of >15 letters and CMT < 300 µm at the end of the study predicted a higher change in VFQ-25.

CONCLUSION

Switching eyes with persistent macular edema due to RVO to aflibercept resulted in significant improvement in visual function and patient satisfaction.

Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs in Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most prevalent causes of visual loss in the Western World. Its pathogenesis is still not completely known. Chronic macular edema and ischemia compromise the functional and anatomical status of the retina. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have demonstrated better results than other previous options, including observation or laser therapy. This narrative review aims to analyze the current aspects related to these drugs.

Effects of Switching to Aflibercept in Treatment Resistant Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine 12-month outcomes of eyes switched from intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab to aflibercept for cystoid macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observation, case series.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed assessing eyes with RVO switched to aflibercept for at least 12 months. To be included in the study, eyes had to have macular edema despite treatment for at least 6 months with bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab before the switch, central foveal thickness (CFT) ≥300 μm at time of switch, and visual acuity (VA) ≤60 early treatment of diabetic retinopathy score (ETDRS) letters (20/40 Snellen equivalent). Outcome measures included change in VA (in ETDRS letters), CFT, and interval between intravitreal injections.

RESULTS

27 eyes of 27 patients were included in the analysis: 13 with branch RVO, and 14 with central RVO. Mean VA before switch was 54.2 ± 23.7 letters (20/80 Snellen equivalent) and mean CFT was 460.4 ± 178.2 μm. Mean number of previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections was 29.5 ± 19.2. At 12 months, mean VA improved by 8.7 ± 13.2 letters (P < 0.01) and mean CFT decreased by 180.9 ± 207.7 μm compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Mean injection interval increased by 1.6 ± 2.0 weeks to 6.9 ± 1.2 weeks, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

In our small retrospective study, eyes switched to intravitreal aflibercept for persistent cystoid macular edema (CME) due to RVO improved vision and macular thickness; however, larger prospective studies are required to validate our findings.

Month 12 Outcomes After Treatment Change at Month 6 Among Poor Responders to Aflibercept or Bevacizumab in Eyes With Macular Edema Secondary to Central or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Study

Importance

Information is needed to assess switching treatment in eyes with a poor response to 6 months of monthly administration of aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema from central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO).

Objective

To investigate visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) changes from month 6 to 12 among eyes with a poor response at month 6 to monthly dosing of aflibercept or bevacizumab in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) was conducted at 66 private practice or academic centers in the United States. Participants included 49 patients (1 eye from each patient evaluated) with CRVO- or HRVO-associated macular edema and a protocol-defined poor response to aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment at month 6. The first month 6 visit occurred on September 8, 2015, and the last month 12 visit occurred on October 24, 2016.

Interventions

Treatment in eyes receiving monthly aflibercept was switched to a dexamethasone implant at month 6 and, if needed, at months 9, 10, or 11. Treatment in eyes receiving monthly bevacizumab was switched to aflibercept at months 6, 7, and 8, and then to a treat-and-extend aflibercept regimen until month 12.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change from month 6 to 12 in VALS and CST.

Results

Of the 49 participants at month 6, aflibercept treatment had failed in 14 (6 [43%] women; mean [SD] age, 70.4 [13.0] years). Bevacizumab treatment had failed in 35 patients (16 [46%] women; mean age, 70.0 [13.2] years). In 14 eyes with treatment switched from aflibercept to dexamethasone, the estimated mean change from month 6 to 12 in VALS was 2.63 (95% CI, -3.29 to 8.56; P = .37) and 46.0 μm (95% CI, -80.9 to 172.9 μm; P = .46) for CST. In 35 eyes with treatment switched from bevacizumab to aflibercept, the estimated mean change from month 6 to 12 in VALS was 10.27 (95% CI, 6.05-14.49; P < .001) and -125.4 μm (95% CI, -180.9 to -69.9 μm; P < .001) for CST.

Conclusions and Relevance

Eyes treated with aflibercept after a poor response to bevacizumab had improvement in VALS and CST. Few eyes had a poor response to aflibercept, and therefore, few eyes were switched to dexamethasone. Caution is warranted in interpreting these results owing to the small number of eyes and lack of comparison groups. These factors preclude definitive assessment of whether the switching strategy is superior to maintaining treatment.

Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab

IMPORTANCE

To examine the effect of switching from intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

BACKGROUND

We report the results of a prospective interventional study on the effect of aflibercept 2 mg in eyes with persistent macular oedema after long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

DESIGN

Non-randomized, prospective clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen eyes of eighteen patients were included.

METHODS

Eyes with persistent macular oedema despite a minimum of four previous intravitreal bevacizumab/ranibizumab injections were recruited into this 48-week trial. Three loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept were administered every 4-weeks, thereafter every 8-weeks until week 48.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as measured by early treatment diabetic retinopathy score (ETDRS) and central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients had received a mean of 40.0 ± 17.8 bevacizumab/ranibizumab intravitreal injections prior to switching to aflibercept. The mean number of previous injections administered in the 12-months preceding entry into the study was 10.2 ± 2.4. Mean vision change at week 48 was +21.1 ± 5.1 ETDRS letters in the BRVO group and +18.8 ± 5.9 letters at in the CRVO group (P < .001 for both groups). Mean decrease in CMT was 87.6 ± 48.8 μm and 191.0 ± 128.3 μm, in the BRVO and CRVO groups, respectively (P < .001). Using linear regression analyses, a higher number of previous intravitreal ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections and thicker pre-switch CMT were correlated with greater visual gains.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Switching to aflibercept from bevacizumab or ranibizumab in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to RVO can lead to functional and anatomical improvement. This effect was more obvious in eyes with a greater CMT prior to the switch.

Intravitreal conbercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 66 eyes of 63 patients with neovascular AMD. All patients received 0.5 mg intravitreal injections of conbercept monthly for 3 consecutive months, and then pro re nata treatment was performed. The changes of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were observed before and after treatments. Minimum follow-up time was 12mo. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA and CMT of 66 eyes (63 patients) were 1.11±0.60, 533.20±219.95 µm at baseline, and were 0.68±0.38, 310.28±125.60 µm at 3mo. No subjects were lost during the first three months, the improvements were all significantly (P<0.05). During the whole follow-up time of 12mo, 15 subjects (18 eyes) were lost. The mean BCVA and CMT of the rest 48 eyes with the follow-up time at least 1y were 0.83±0.46 and 547.59±196.77 µm at baseline, after 3mo and 12mo of conbercept injections became 0.55±0.41, 318.24±141.29 µm and 0.55±0.51, 333.87±173.25 µm. The differences were significant (P<0.05). No serious complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of conbercept appears to significantly improve visual acuity and anatomical outcomes in patients with neovascular AMD, no serious adverse reactions and complications are observed.

A meta-analysis of patients with treatment-resistant macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions following switching to aflibercept

To systematically review anatomical and functional outcomes of switching therapy from bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab to aflibercept in patients with persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVO). A systematic search of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to branch and central RVO was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases prior to June 2017. The main outcome variables described were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). All results were analysed and pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 137 eyes, incorporating both branch and central RVO. Meta-analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant change in BCVA at 6 and 12 months following switch to aflibercept (4.40 letters, 95% CI: -3.10 to 11.90, p = 0.25 and 3.10 letters, 95% CI: -1.74 to 7.94, p = 0.21, respectively). Significant improvement in mean CMT was observed after switch to aflibercept at 6 (-256.00 μm, 95% CI: -318.00 to -194.00, p < 0.001) but not 12 months (-118.00 μm, 95% CI: -261.00 to 25.00, p = 0.11). Switching from bevacizumab/ranibizumab to aflibercept may improve persistent macular oedema secondary to RVO. However, there may be a limitation in the potential of visual recovery.

Real-World Results of Switching Treatment from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Introduction

To investigate treatment outcomes after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in patients with macular oedema (MO) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

Eligible patients with refractory MO secondary to BRVO, post treatment with a minimum of three intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at 4-weekly intervals were recruited. Suboptimal or non-responders were defined as patients who had persistent intraretinal fluid (< 75% decrease from baseline) despite a minimum of three consecutive injections. These patients were switched to aflibercept injections on an as-needed basis. The primary study outcomes assessed trends in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). To compare means of BCVA and CRT, a paired t test two-tailed with a level of significance set at 0.05 was used. Pearson correlation coefficient was also applied to demonstrate correlation. Participants were followed up for a period of 24 weeks after switching.

Results

Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients were included in the study. Patients had an average of 8.37 ranibizumab intravitreal injections over a mean period of 12 months presenting suboptimal or no response. A significant decrease of mean CRT from 388.63 ± 93.4 μm to 290.29 ± 93.5 μm (p < 0.001) and an improvement in mean BCVA from logMAR 0.66 ± 0.38 to logMAR 0.57 ± 0.27 (p = 0.025) was achieved after an average of 2.27 aflibercept injections.

Conclusions

Given the spectrum of therapies available to date for the management of MO secondary to BRVO, aflibercept appears to be an effective treatment option in cases refractory to ranibizumab. This study based on a small cohort of patients indicates that satisfactory results on retinal anatomy and visual outcomes can be accomplished with a smaller number of injections. Larger-scale studies are needed to extrapolate these promising results.

Extended Injection Intervals after Switching from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Edema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To assess treatment interval extension after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with an insufficient response or frequent recurrences to initial treatment.

METHODS

CRVO eyes treated with ranibizumab injections on a treat-and-extend (TAE) basis with an insufficient response or frequent recurrences were switched to aflibercept. Primary endpoint was the change in injection intervals before and after the switch.

RESULTS

Eleven eyes were included in this retrospective bicentric study. Before switching, patients received a mean number of 15.3 ranibizumab injections (range, 6-34) during a mean follow-up of 23.4 months (range, 6-57). After switching to aflibercept, patients received a mean number of 12.4 injections (range, 6-20) during a mean follow-up of 25.5 months (range, 16-38). Treatment interval could be extended from 6.1 (range, 4-8) to 11 weeks (range, 8-16) (p=0.001) corresponding to a mean extension of injection interval of +4.9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In case of insufficient response or frequent recurrences of ME due to CRVO in patients treated with ranibizumab on a TAE basis, switching to aflibercept could allow extending treatment intervals, which could reduce the injection burden for these patients.

Anti-VEGF treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: patterns of use and effectiveness in clinical practice (ECHO study report 2)

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and injection frequency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonists in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in clinical practice.

Patients and methods

A multicenter retrospective study of the medical records of 165 patients (95 branch RVO, 70 central RVO) treated with at least three anti-VEGF injections in the study eye was conducted. Available data collected for at least 6 months after the first injection included Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) by time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), anti-VEGF injections, other treatments/procedures for RVO, and adverse events.

Results

At baseline prior to anti-VEGF treatment, mean BCVA was 20/80 Snellen equivalent and mean CRT was 499 μm. Mean number of anti-VEGF injections received was 7.1 during the first year, 5.4 during the second year, and 5.9 during the third year; 51.3% (842/1,641) of injections were ranibizumab, 44.1% (724/1,641) were bevacizumab, and 4.6% (75/1,641) were aflibercept. One in five patients received concomitant focal laser treatment. The percentage of patients achieving both BCVA of 20/40 or better and CRT ≤250 μm on TD-OCT or ≤300 μm on SD-OCT at the same visit (primary endpoint) was 26.1% (30/115) after the first anti-VEGF injection and ranged from 20.0% (7/35) to 36.7% (11/30) after the first 16 injections. After each anti-VEGF injection from the 1st to the 16th, <60% of patients achieved 20/40 or better BCVA and ≤70% of patients achieved CRT ≤250 μm on TD-OCT or ≤300 μm on SD-OCT. The most common treatment-related adverse event was blurry or cloudy vision.

Conclusion

In this real-world study, a mean of five to seven anti-VEGF injections was administered yearly, and the response to anti-VEGF therapy was suboptimal in many patients. Anti-VEGF therapy was well tolerated.

Aflibercept Versus Bevacizumab and/or Ranibizumab for Recurrent Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To compare functional and anatomic outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept versus bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab in patients with recurrent macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Retrospective, comparative case series of patients with recurrent ME in the setting of CRVO. Patients with recurrent ME received treatment with aflibercept (Group 1, G1) or bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab (Group 2, G2). Primary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT).

RESULTS

Of the 20 eyes (20 patients) with recurrent ME included in the study, 9 received aflibercept (G1) and 11 received bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab (G2). Median BCVA at recurrence of ME and at most recent follow-up was 20/60 (G1) and 20/80 (G2) and 20/40 (G1) and 20/50 (G2, P > 0.05 for all comparisons), respectively. Median CFT at recurrence of ME and at most recent follow-up was 492 μm (G1) and 448 μm (G2) and 291 μm (G1) and 295 μm (G2, P > 0.05 for all comparisons), respectively. Complete resolution of ME for at least 4 months was found in 78% (G1) and 55% (G2) of patients with a median injection free interval of 11 (G1) and 13 (G2) months (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent ME secondary to CRVO, there was improvement in BCVA and CFT in all groups, although patients treated with aflibercept showed a trend toward better anatomical outcomes decreased need for recurrent injections.

Aflibercept for Previously Treated Macular Edema Associated with Central Retinal Vein Occlusions: 1-Year Results of the NEWTON Study

PURPOSE

To determine whether aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) can extend the macular edema-free interval in patients with nonischemic central retinal vein occlusions (CRVOs) previously treated with ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) or bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA).

DESIGN

Prospective, single-arm, interventional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients with chronic nonischemic CRVOs.

METHODS

Patients with nonischemic CRVOs previously treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab were switched to aflibercept. The inclusion criteria included treatment for ≥6 months with ≥3 initial loading doses and evidence of recurrence of edema when treatment with either ranibizumab or bevacizumab extended beyond 4 weeks. Intravitreal aflibercept was administered with a treat-and-extend dosing regimen. Injection frequencies were extended 2 weeks if there were no signs of disease activity on OCT or change in visual acuity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Macular edema-free interval at week 52.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had an average duration of a CRVO for 22 months (range, 7-90 months) and averaged an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment every 42 days (range, 28-60 days). These patients received a mean of 15 treatments (range, 5-47 treatments) of ranibizumab or bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to nonischemic CRVO. Among the 17 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up, 94% had a greater macular edema-free interval with aflibercept treatment. The macular edema-free interval increased from 5.4 weeks to 9.1 weeks when treatment was switched to aflibercept (P = 0.000003). There was an average increase of 26 days (range, 0-63 days) in the macular edema free interval with aflibercept. There was an improvement in vision (+6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, P = 0.02) and decreased retinal thickness (152 μm, P = 0.0002) with aflibercept treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients previously treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for macular edema due to nonischemic CRVO, aflibercept increased the macular edema free interval. This may help minimize the treatment burden in patients with recurrent macular edema secondary to nonischemic CRVO.

Short-term outcomes in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion who received intravitreal aflibercept with or without intravitreal ranibizumab

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes for patients who received intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) with or without intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Patients and methods

Patients received IVA for ME due to BRVO. Patients who initially received IVA were defined as the treatment-naïve group and those who were switched from IVR to IVA after ME recurrence were defined as the switching group. Patient outcomes were examined at 1 week and 1 month postinjection.

Results

Both groups comprised 27 eyes from 27 patients. There was a significant decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) at 1 week and 1 month postinjection in both groups. There was also a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 week and 1 month postinjection in the treatment-naïve group and 1 month in the switching group. Younger age was associated with a good BCVA at 1 month postinjection in the switching group, and the absence of epiretinal membrane was associated with a reduction in CMT at 1 month postinjection in the switching group.

Conclusion

IVA is temporarily effective for treating ME due to BRVO regardless of a history of IVR use.

Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab

PURPOSE

To assess the treatment outcome of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

A prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary retina service in Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK, where patients with CRVO and associated macular oedema were recruited. First-line treatment involved three monthly ranibizumab injections. Non-responders were defined as patients who despite a minimum of three consecutive injections had persistent intraretinal fluid one month after the last injection. In these cases, a treatment change to aflibercept injections on a per-needed basis was decided. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured before and after switching of treatment. Follow-up period lasted for a minimum of 24 weeks after switching.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with refractory macular oedema secondary to CRVO were included. All eyes had an average of 4.5 ranibizumab intravitreal injections in a mean period of 6 months without reduction in intraretinal fluid and/or no visual acuity gain. A significant decrease in mean CRT from 633.67 ± 242.42 to 234.62 ± 78.28 μm and improvement in mean BCVA from 1.34 ± 0.66 log MAR to 0.91 ± 0.73 log MAR were noticed after switching treatment to aflibercept. The average number of aflibercept injections needed for oedema resolution was 2.19.

CONCLUSIONS

Aflibercept is an effective alternative treatment for macular oedema secondary to CRVO refractory to ranibizumab. Good anatomical and functional result can be achieved with few injections. The maintenance of these results after 6 months is yet to be investigated.

Prolongation of injection interval after switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to investigate the outcome of switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in daily practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 15 eyes in 15 Japanese patients with ME secondary to BRVO who had been receiving a pro re nata regimen of ranibizumab and had provided written informed consent to switch to aflibercept therapy. The intravitreal injection interval, central retinal thickness, and visual acuity were evaluated before and after switching.

RESULTS

The mean period of ranibizumab treatment was 11.8±4.2 months. The mean observation period after switching to aflibercept was 10.6±3.4 months, and seven patients were observed for more than 12 months after switching. The mean intravitreal injection interval was prolonged by 23.6 days with aflibercept (68.2±26.4 days with ranibizumab vs 91.8±33.2 days with aflibercept; P=0.0011). The mean intravitreal injection interval just before the switch was 81.3±35.6 days and was significantly prolonged to 100.8±34.2 days just after the switch to aflibercept (P=0.0309). The mean central retinal thickness did not change before or after the switch to aflibercept (295±55 μm with ranibizumab vs 276±25 μm with aflibercept; P=0.12). The mean visual acuity also remained at an improved level after the switch. No systemic or ocular side effects were evident during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Switching therapy from ranibizumab to aflibercept in Japanese patients with ME secondary to BRVO prolonged the intravitreal injection interval without anatomical or functional degradation.

Ranibizumab versus aflibercept for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: 18-month results in real-life data

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept for the treatment of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Participants in this observational study included 62 treatment-naïve patients with CRVO who received intravitreal injections of either ranibizumab or aflibercept. The demographic data, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) characteristics were evaluated at baseline and at months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 post-treatment.

RESULTS

At month 18, the mean BCVA of ranibizumab-treated eyes increased 7.9 letters, compared to 7.4 letters for eyes receiving aflibercept, with a similar number of injections. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in letters or in central subfield thickness at month 18. At the end of the follow-up, 50% of patients in the ranibizumab group and 42.9% in the aflibercept group showed complete resolution of macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab and aflibercept demonstrated similar anatomical and functional outcomes over 18-month follow-up in patients with macular edema due to CRVO, with a similar number of injections.

Management of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion - The role of aflibercept

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) can cause vision loss. The pathogenesis of CRVO involves a thrombus formation leading to increased retinal capillary pressure, increased vascular permeability, and possibly retinal neovascularization. Vision loss due to CRVO is commonly caused by macular edema. Multiple treatment modalities have been used to treat macular edema. Currently, the most common therapy used is intravitreal inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The three most widely used agents are aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab and they are effective at blocking VEGF. In addition, intraocular steroids can be used to treat macular edema. This review will briefly cover the treatment options and discuss in greater detail the efficacy and safety of aflibercept.

Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept for macular edema following retinal vein occlusion

Aim

To report the efficacy of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections in eyes with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions (RVOs).

Methods

Consecutive patients with persistent or recurrent macular edema (central macula thickness >250 μm) due to RVO were enrolled in this prospective study. Study eyes received intravitreal injections of ziv-aflibercept (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) at baseline. Patients were reassessed monthly for 4 months and given additional injections pro re nata for worsening best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal edema or subretinal fluid seen on spectral domain optical coherence tomography, or central macular thickness (CMT) measurements >250 μm. The primary endpoint was improvement in mean CMT at 4 months. Secondary endpoints included improvement in mean BCVA, and ocular and systemic safety signals.

Results

Nine eyes (five central and four branch RVOs) of nine patients were enrolled. The mean ± standard deviation CMT decreased from 604±199 μm at baseline to 319±115 μm (P=0.001) at 1 month and to 351±205 μm (P=0.026) at 4 months. The mean BCVA did not improve significantly from baseline (1.00 LogMAR) to the 1-month (0.74 LogMAR; P=0.2) and 4-month (0.71 LogMAR; P=0.13) visits. No safety signals were noted.

Conclusion

In this small prospective study, intravitreal ziv-aflibercept significantly improved mean CMT in eyes with persistent or recurrent macular edema due to RVOs. Prospective, randomized trials comparing ziv-aflibercept with standard pharmacotherapy are needed to better define efficacy and safety.

Aflibercept in branch retinal vein occlusion as second line therapy: clinical outcome 12 months after changing treatment from bevacizumab/ranibizumab-a pilot study

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of aflibercept (as second line therapy) on the clinical outcome in patients with chronic macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) insufficiently responding to prior treatment with bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab.

Methods

Ten eyes of ten patients (n = 10) with chronic macular edema secondary to BRVO were included in a retrospective analysis. These patients received aflibercept after an insufficient response to treatment with ranibizumab and/- or bevacizumab. All intravitreal injections were administered according to a “treat and extend” regimen. Insufficient response was defined as the necessity of injection intervals of 6 weeks or less. The primary outcome of the study was the change in mean injection interval from baseline (prior switching to aflibercept) to month 12 after conversion to aflibercept. Secondary outcomes included the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), central retinal volume (CRV) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results

All patients completed 12 months follow-up. In total, patients received a mean of 15.5 injections of ranibizumab and/or bevacizumab over a mean period of 23.1 months prior to switching to aflibercept. The primary endpoint indicated a significant increase in the injection interval from 5.0 weeks at baseline to 8.3 weeks at month 12 (p = 0.002). Secondary outcomes showed favorable results. Mean BCVA increased from 72.7 letters at baseline to 77.9 letters at month 12 after treatment initiation with aflibercept (+5.2 letters, p = 0.375). Correspondingly, CRT values decreased by 61.7 µm (p = 0.344) and the mean CRV (6 mm diameter) by 0.86 mm³ (p = 0.021) from baseline to 1 year after treatment initiation with aflibercept. During the treatment period with aflibercept no significant changes in intraocular pressure were registered (p = 0.238).

Conclusions

Changing treatment to aflibercept in patients with chronic macular edema secondary to BRVO showed a statistically significant extension of the retreatment interval as well as beneficial anatomic changes in our study group. Our data do not allow a definite conclusion since the study was not controlled.

Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common retinal vascular disorder that can result in severe visual acuity loss. The randomized control study, CRUISE, helped establish anti-VEGFs as the standard of care in cases with CRVO. The extension studies for CRUISE; HORIZON and RETAIN showed that not all visual gains are maintained beyond the first year. In addition, patients showed different behavior patterns; with some patients showing complete response with few recurrences, whereas others showed partial or even no response with multiple recurrences. Long-term follow-up demonstrated that patients responding poorly to anti-VEGFs tended to do so early in the course of treatment. It also demonstrated the effectiveness of a pro re nata (PRN) protocol for improving vision and maintaining these gains over long-term follow-ups. The SHORE study further illustrated this point by demonstrating that there were minimal differences in visual outcomes between patients receiving monthly injections and patients being treated PRN. In this review we analyzed the data from the major randomized clinical trials (RCT) that looked at anti-VEGFs as the primary treatment modality in patients with CRVO (CRUISE and the extension studies HORIZON and RETAIN for ranibizumab as well as GALILEO and COPERNICUS for aflibercept). In addition, we looked at SCORE and GENEVA to help determine whether there is a place for steroids as a first line therapy in current treatment practice. We then explored alternative treatment regimens such as laser therapy and switching between anti-VEGF agents and/or steroids for non or partially responding patients. Finally, we propose a simplified modified treatment algorithm for patients with CRVO for better long-term outcomes in all types of responders.