|
1
|
Wolf SM, Ossorio PN, Berry SA, Greely HT, McGuire AL, Penny MA, Terry SF. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:69-86. [PMID: 32342790 PMCID: PMC7447150 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520916996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Pilar N Ossorio
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Susan A Berry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Henry T Greely
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Michelle A Penny
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Sharon F Terry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hines P, Hiu Yu L, Guy RH, Brand A, Papaluca-Amati M. Scanning the horizon: a systematic literature review of methodologies. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026764. [PMID: 31133588 PMCID: PMC6549743 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Society is confronted with the rapid emergence of innovation in science and technology. To manage this, horizon scanning is being adopted globally to identify, assess and prioritise innovations and trends at an early stage of their development. This enables decision-makers to be better informed and to prepare for change. The aim of this paper is to systematically identify and evaluate horizon scanning methodologies employed in the healthcare and biomedical fields. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed and Embase and was supplemented with grey literature searches (2008-2018). The principal methodologies used in horizon scanning were extracted. RESULTS Approximately 100 articles were summarised in a literature map. The search revealed many examples of horizon scanning across disciplines. Challenges, such as the need to refine prioritisation criteria, manage uncertainty inherent in the findings and improve the dissemination of identified issues, have been highlighted. CONCLUSION Horizon scanning, when performed appropriately, is a flexible and potentially reliable tool, with a wide variety of methods. Horizon scanning can inform and influence decision-making, through identifying opportunities and challenges, from an organisational to an international level. Further research to identify the most effective methodologies available would add depth to this landscape and enable the evolution of best practice to most efficiently anticipate novel developments and innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hines
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UNU-MERIT, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Li Hiu Yu
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard H Guy
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Angela Brand
- UNU-MERIT, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marisa Papaluca-Amati
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Medical nuclomics. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:294-296. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
|
4
|
Nikolaidis C, Ming C, Pedrazzani C, van der Horst T, Kaiser-Grolimund A, Ademi Z, Bührer-Landolt R, Bürki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Champion V, Chappuis PO, Kohler C, Erlanger TE, Graffeo R, Hampel H, Heinimann K, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Kurzeder C, Monnerat C, Northouse LL, Pagani O, Probst-Hensch N, Rabaglio M, Schoenau E, Sijbrands EJG, Taborelli M, Urech C, Viassolo V, Wieser S, Katapodi MC. Challenges and Opportunities for Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome in Switzerland: Findings from an International Workshop. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:121-132. [PMID: 30695780 DOI: 10.1159/000496495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An international workshop on cancer predisposition cascade genetic screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS) took place in Switzerland, with leading researchers and clinicians in cascade screening and hereditary cancer from different disciplines. The purpose of the workshop was to enhance the implementation of cascade genetic screening in Switzerland. Participants discussed the challenges and opportunities associated with cascade screening for HBOC and LS in Switzerland (CASCADE study); family implications and the need for family-based interventions; the need to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cascade genetic screening; and interprofessional collaboration needed to lead this initiative. METHODS The workshop aims were achieved through exchange of data and experiences from successful cascade screening programs in the Netherlands, Australia, and the state of Ohio, USA; Swiss-based studies and scientific experience that support cancer cascade screening in Switzerland; programs of research in psychosocial oncology and family-based studies; data from previous cost-effectiveness analyses of cascade genetic screening in the Netherlands and in Australia; and organizational experience from a large interprofessional collaborative. Scientific presentations were recorded and discussions were synthesized to present the workshop findings. RESULTS The key elements of successful implementation of cascade genetic screening are a supportive network of stakeholders and connection to complementary initiatives; sample size and recruitment of relatives; centralized organization of services; data-based cost-effectiveness analyses; transparent organization of the initiative; and continuous funding. CONCLUSIONS This paper describes the processes and key findings of an international workshop on cancer predisposition cascade screening, which will guide the CASCADE study in Switzerland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Nikolaidis
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chang Ming
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carla Pedrazzani
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Tina van der Horst
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Kaiser-Grolimund
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- European Center of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Nicole Bürki
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Pierre O Chappuis
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Unit of Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention, Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Kohler
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias E Erlanger
- Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Institute of Oncology and Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Heather Hampel
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Karl Heinimann
- Institute for Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, and Research Group Human Genomics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Olivia Pagani
- Institute of Oncology and Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Probst-Hensch
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Rabaglio
- University Clinic for Medical Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eveline Schoenau
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eric J G Sijbrands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monika Taborelli
- Institute of Oncology and Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Corinne Urech
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Valeria Viassolo
- Unit of Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention, Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Simon Wieser
- Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, .,University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Latour-Pérez J. Clinical research in critical care. Difficulties and perspectives. Med Intensiva 2017; 42:184-195. [PMID: 28943024 DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
In the field of Intensive Care Medicine, improved survival has resulted from better patient care, the early detection of clinical deterioration, and the prevention of iatrogenic complications, while research on new treatments has been followed by an overwhelming number of disappointments. The origins of these fiascos must be sought in the conjunction of methodological problems - common to other disciplines - and the particularities of critically ill patients. The present article discusses both aspects and suggests some options for progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Latour-Pérez
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, España; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d'Alacant, España.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Building a Platform to Enable NCD Research to Address Population Health in Africa: CVD Working Group Discussion at the Sixth H3Africa Consortium Meeting in Zambia. Glob Heart 2017; 11:165-70. [PMID: 27102038 DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
|
7
|
Abstract
The concept of translational cancer epidemiology has evolved since its early beginnings in 1937 with the establishment of the National Cancer Institute. Conceptual models of cancer control research have also evolved over the last 30 years, to the point where we now have 4 stages of translational research (T0-T4). The current review by Lam et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(7):451-458) covers cancer epidemiology research supported by the National Cancer Institute and a selected sample of the cancer epidemiology literature. It suggests that most cancer epidemiology in the last 10 years has been in pure discovery research. Current "drivers" of cancer epidemiology research, including new technologies, team science multilevel research, and knowledge integration, are not strongly represented in the review. However, the use of epidemiology in the latter stages of translation may not have been captured by the scope of this review. The closer epidemiologists get to advanced stages of translation, the more likely they are to work with investigators in other disciplines in other sectors of society. An argument can be made that regardless of whether this kind of research is not happening or was just missed by the current review, the field of cancer epidemiology can expand its scope and further evolve towards more effective applications in population health.
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Lam TK, Chang CQ, Rogers SD, Khoury MJ, Schully SD. Evolution of the "drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology: analysis of funded grants and the literature. Am J Epidemiol 2015; 181:451-8. [PMID: 25767265 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Concurrently with a workshop sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, we identified key "drivers" for accelerating cancer epidemiology across the translational research continuum in the 21st century: emerging technologies, a multilevel approach, knowledge integration, and team science. To map the evolution of these "drivers" and translational phases (T0-T4) in the past decade, we analyzed cancer epidemiology grants funded by the National Cancer Institute and published literature for 2000, 2005, and 2010. For each year, we evaluated the aims of all new/competing grants and abstracts of randomly selected PubMed articles. Compared with grants based on a single institution, consortium-based grants were more likely to incorporate contemporary technologies (P = 0.012), engage in multilevel analyses (P = 0.010), and incorporate elements of knowledge integration (P = 0.036). Approximately 74% of analyzed grants and publications involved discovery (T0) or characterization (T1) research, suggesting a need for more translational (T2-T4) research. Our evaluation indicated limited research in 1) a multilevel approach that incorporates molecular, individual, social, and environmental determinants and 2) knowledge integration that evaluates the robustness of scientific evidence. Cancer epidemiology is at the cusp of a paradigm shift, and the field will need to accelerate the pace of translating scientific discoveries in order to impart population health benefits. While multi-institutional and technology-driven collaboration is happening, concerted efforts to incorporate other key elements are warranted for the discipline to meet future challenges.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Wolf SM, Burke W, Koenig BA. Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:486-501. [PMID: 26479558 PMCID: PMC4620583 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Both bioethics and law have governed human genomics by distinguishing research from clinical practice. Yet the rise of translational genomics now makes this traditional dichotomy inadequate. This paper pioneers a new approach to the ethics of translational genomics. It maps the full range of ethical approaches needed, proposes a "layered" approach to determining the ethics framework for projects combining research and clinical care, and clarifies the key role that return of results can play in advancing translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Wolf
- McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy, Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law, Professor of Medicine; Faculty Member, Center for Bioethics, Chair, Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota, 325 Johnston Hall, 101 Pleasant St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, Tel.: 612-301-1121,
| | - Wylie Burke
- Department of Bioethics & Humanities, Adjunct Professor, Department of Medicine, Member, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1107 NE 45 St., Suite 305, Seattle, WA 98105-4690, Tel.: 206-221-5482,
| | - Barbara A. Koenig
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94118, Tel.: 415-710-8217,
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Muin J Khoury
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA.
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Stanford Prevention Research Center and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Abstract
In a 2005 paper that has been accessed more than a million times, John Ioannidis explained why most published research findings were false. Here he revisits the topic, this time to address how to improve matters. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, California, United States of America
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Fashoyin-Aje L, Sanghavi K, Bjornard K, Bodurtha J. Integrating genetic and genomic information into effective cancer care in diverse populations. Ann Oncol 2013; 24 Suppl 7:vii48-54. [PMID: 24001763 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of issues in the integration of genetic (related to hereditary DNA) and genomic (related to genes and their functions) information in cancer care for individuals and families who are part of health care systems worldwide, from low to high resourced. National and regional cancer plans have the potential to integrate genetic and genomic information with a goal of identifying and helping individuals and families with and at risk of cancer. Healthcare professionals and the public have the opportunity to increase their genetic literacy and communication about cancer family history to enhance cancer control, prevention, and tailored therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fashoyin-Aje
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Ioannidis JPA, Chang CQ, Lam TK, Schully SD, Khoury MJ. The geometric increase in meta-analyses from China in the genomic era. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65602. [PMID: 23776510 PMCID: PMC3680482 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Accepted: 04/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Meta-analyses are increasingly popular. It is unknown whether this popularity is driven by specific countries and specific meta-analyses types. PubMed was used to identify meta-analyses since 1995 (last update 9/1/2012) and catalogue their types and country of origin. We focused more on meta-analyses from China (the current top producer of meta-analyses) versus the USA (top producer until recently). The annual number of meta-analyses from China increased 40-fold between 2003 and 2011 versus 2.4-fold for the USA. The growth of Chinese meta-analyses was driven by genetics (110-fold increase in 2011 versus 2003). The HuGE Navigator identified 612 meta-analyses of genetic association studies published in 2012 from China versus only 109 from the USA. We compared in-depth 50 genetic association meta-analyses from China versus 50 from USA in 2012. Meta-analyses from China almost always used only literature-based data (92%), and focused on one or two genes (94%) and variants (78%) identified with candidate gene approaches (88%), while many USA meta-analyses used genome-wide approaches and raw data. Both groups usually concluded favorably for the presence of genetic associations (80% versus 74%), but nominal significance (P<0.05) typically sufficed in the China group. Meta-analyses from China typically neglected genome-wide data, and often included candidate gene studies published in Chinese-language journals. Overall, there is an impressive rise of meta-analyses from China, particularly on genetic associations. Since most claimed candidate gene associations are likely false-positives, there is an urgent global need to incorporate genome-wide data and state-of-the art statistical inferences to avoid a flood of false-positive genetic meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P A Ioannidis
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Wolkenhauer O, Auffray C, Jaster R, Steinhoff G, Dammann O. The road from systems biology to systems medicine. Pediatr Res 2013; 73:502-7. [PMID: 23314297 DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
As research institutions prepare roadmaps for "systems medicine," we ask how this differs from applications of systems biology approaches in medicine and what we (should) have learned from about one decade of funding in systems biology. After surveying the area, we conclude that systems medicine is the logical next step and necessary extension of systems biology, and we focus on clinically relevant applications. We specifically discuss three related notions. First, more interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to face the challenges of integrating basic research and clinical practice: integration, analysis, and interpretation of clinical and nonclinical data for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy require advanced statistical, computational, and mathematical tools. Second, strategies are required to (i) develop and maintain computational platforms for the integration of clinical and nonclinical data, (ii) further develop technologies for quantitative and time-resolved tracking of changes in gene expression, cell signaling, and metabolism in relation to environmental and lifestyle influences, and (iii) develop methodologies for mathematical and statistical analyses of integrated data sets and multilevel models. Third, interdisciplinary collaborations represent a major challenge and are difficult to implement. For an efficient and successful initiation of interdisciplinary systems medicine programs, we argue that epistemological, ontological, and sociological aspects require attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Wolkenhauer
- Department of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Lam TK, Spitz M, Schully SD, Khoury MJ. "Drivers" of translational cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: needs and opportunities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:181-8. [PMID: 23322363 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer epidemiology is at the cusp of a paradigm shift--propelled by an urgent need to accelerate the pace of translating scientific discoveries into health care and population health benefits. As part of a strategic planning process for cancer epidemiologic research, the Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program (EGRP) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is leading a "longitudinal" meeting with members of the research community to engage in an on-going dialogue to help shape and invigorate the field. Here, we review a translational framework influenced by "drivers" that we believe have begun guiding cancer epidemiology toward translation in the past few years and are most likely to drive the field further in the next decade. The drivers include: (i) collaboration and team science, (ii) technology, (iii) multilevel analyses and interventions, and (iv) knowledge integration from basic, clinical, and population sciences. Using the global prevention of cervical cancer as an example of a public health endeavor to anchor the conversation, we discuss how these drivers can guide epidemiology from discovery to population health impact, along the translational research continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tram Kim Lam
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
The arrival of genomic medicine to the clinic is only the beginning of the journey. Genet Med 2013; 15:268-9. [PMID: 23306801 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
|
17
|
Ioannidis JPA, Schully SD, Lam TK, Khoury MJ. Knowledge integration in cancer: current landscape and future prospects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 22:3-10. [PMID: 23093546 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge integration includes knowledge management, synthesis, and translation processes. It aims to maximize the use of collected scientific information and accelerate translation of discoveries into individual and population health benefits. Accumulated evidence in cancer epidemiology constitutes a large share of the 2.7 million articles on cancer in PubMed. We examine the landscape of knowledge integration in cancer epidemiology. Past approaches have mostly used retrospective efforts of knowledge management and traditional systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Systematic searches identify 2,332 meta-analyses, about half of which are on genetics and epigenetics. Meta-analyses represent 1:89-1:1162 of published articles in various cancer subfields. Recently, there are more collaborative meta-analyses with individual-level data, including those with prospective collection of measurements [e.g., genotypes in genome-wide association studies (GWAS)]; this may help increase the reliability of inferences in the field. However, most meta-analyses are still done retrospectively with published information. There is also a flurry of candidate gene meta-analyses with spuriously prevalent "positive" results. Prospective design of large research agendas, registration of datasets, and public availability of data and analyses may improve our ability to identify knowledge gaps, maximize and accelerate translational progress or-at a minimum-recognize dead ends in a more timely fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P A Ioannidis
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, 1265 Welch Rd, MSOB X306, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|