1
|
Pessano S, Boldor M, Faravelli F, Fiander M, Jørgensen KJ, Soll RF, Bruschettini M. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques for pre-symptomatic identification of genetic diseases in newborns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2025; 4:CD016118. [PMID: 40192933 PMCID: PMC11975189 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd016118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of using NGS techniques compared to conventional newborn screening alone for pre-symptomatic identification of genetic diseases in newborns. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES to explore equity and ethical issues in the application of the new techniques, to inform healthcare decisions by families, carers, and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Pessano
- Scientific Direction, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Medical Statistics and Biometry Postgraduate School, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Boldor
- Department of Neonatology, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - Francesca Faravelli
- Genomics and Clinical Genetics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Michelle Fiander
- Vermont Oxford Network, Cochrane Neonatal Group, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Cochrane Denmark and Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Odense, Odense, Denmark
| | - Roger F Soll
- Vermont Oxford Network, Cochrane Neonatal Group, Burlington, Vermont, USA
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Cochrane Sweden, Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation; Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nawlo J, Espino K, Gerber D, Akerman M, Chan K, Jimenez E, Chalas E. Frequency of Genetic Testing Among Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers: A Strategy to Improve Compliance. Int J Genomics 2025; 2025:9281891. [PMID: 40226356 PMCID: PMC11991803 DOI: 10.1155/ijog/9281891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommended universal germline testing for all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), fallopian tube cancer (FTC), or peritoneal cancer (PC). Despite this position statement, genetic testing (GT) uptake among affected patients remains well below the universal testing goal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an internal policy change on the GT rate at a single institution. Patients and Methods: This investigation was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved (#22-00711) retrospective cohort study which took place at a single institution from June 2021 to April 2022. The study assessed GT uptake among patients diagnosed with EOC, FTC, and PC to evaluate the following internal policy change integrating point-of-care (POC) GT. Results: A total of 272 patients were identified with 47 patients excluded due to nonepithelial tumors. Genetic counseling was documented in 94.2% of eligible patients (212/225) and completed in 90.2% (203/225). Of the 22 (9.8%) who were not genetically tested, 27% (6/22) were offered and declined. Deleterious mutations were identified in 22% (45/205) of patients tested. Of these, 82.2% (37/45) were in BRCA, 6.8% (3/45) in Lynch-associated mutations (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2), 4.4% (2/45) in RAD51, 4.4% (2/45) in BRIP1, and 2.2% (1/45) in an unknown deleterious mutation reportedly diagnosed at a different facility. Conclusion: Internal policy developed based on analysis of compliance with the SGO position statement and subsequent implementation of POC testing led to a significant increase in GT, indicating improvement in quality medical care. GT rates in this population are markedly higher than reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jude Nawlo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Espino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Deanna Gerber
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Department of Biostatistics, New York University School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Kent Chan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Edward Jimenez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Eva Chalas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu Y, Li M, Hua R, Han X, Wu Y, Chen Y, Zhao X, Gao L, Li N, Wang J, Wang Y, Li S. Clinical utility of expanded carrier screening in the preconception and prenatal population: A Chinese cohort study. Clin Chim Acta 2025; 565:120017. [PMID: 39461497 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.120017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical utility of expanded carrier screening (ECS) in Chinese preconception and prenatal populations, focusing on carrier frequency and the impact on at-risk couples (ARCs). METHODS Data from 6,298 Chinese individuals from 4,420 families who underwent a 149-gene ECS panel at a single center were analyzed. The prevalence of positive carriers and ARCs was determined, with follow-up on reproductive decisions and pregnancy outcomes for ARCs. RESULTS Of the individuals screened, 2,673 (42.4 %) were carriers of at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, and 98 (2.22 %) ARCs were identified. GJB2-related deafness and Duchenne muscular dystrophy were the most common autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked disorders. Screening the top 11 (gene carrier rate [GCR] ≥ 1/100), 22 (GCR ≥ 1/200), and 41 (GCR ≥ 1/331) AR genes could identify 53.5 %, 67.9 %, and 81.3 % of variants, respectively. The corresponding ratios for identified ARCs were 90.4 %, 94.0 %, and 100 %. Follow-up data from 80 ARCs indicated that 75.0 % (60/80) took significant action based on the ECS results. Additionally, four families (3.5 %, 4/115) were identified at risk for a second disease unrelated to their initial family monogenic history. CONCLUSIONS This study, representing the largest cohort of a moderate-sized ECS panel test in the Chinese population, demonstrates the clinical utility of ECS in both healthy individuals and those with a family history of monogenic disorders. The data obtained provide valuable insights for developing a Chinese-specific ECS panel. Tailored approaches are critical for wider adoption and successful routine application of ECS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Xu
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Ming Li
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Renyi Hua
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Xu Han
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yi Wu
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yiyao Chen
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Xinrong Zhao
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Li Gao
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Niu Li
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Jian Wang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China; Institute of Birth Defects and Rare Diseases, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yanlin Wang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China; Institute of Birth Defects and Rare Diseases, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Shuyuan Li
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China; Institute of Birth Defects and Rare Diseases, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Semenova E, Guo A, Liang H, Hernandez CJ, John EB, Thaker VV. The expanding landscape of genetic causes of obesity. Pediatr Res 2024:10.1038/s41390-024-03780-6. [PMID: 39690244 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03780-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Obesity and weight regulation disorders are determined by the combined effects of genetics and environment. Polygenic obesity results from the combination of common variants in several genes which predisposes the individual to obesity and its related complications. In contrast, monogenic obesity results from changes in single genes, especially those in leptin-melanocortin pathway, and presents with early onset severe obesity, with or without other syndromic features. Rare variants in melanocortin 4 receptor are the commonest form of monogenic obesity. In addition, structural variation in small or large segments of chromosomes may also present with syndromic forms of obesity. Prader-Willi Syndrome, caused by imprinting errors in chromosome 15q11-13, is the most prevalent genetic cause of severe hyperphagia and obesity. With the advances in technologies, the past decade has witnessed a revolution in the identification of novel genetic causes of obesity, primarily in genes related to the leptin melanocortin pathway. The availability of safe melanocortin analogs holds the potential for targeted therapies for some of these disorders. This review summarizes known and novel rare genetic forms of obesity, along with approaches for the clinical investigation of copy number and sequence variants. The goal is to provide a reference for practicing clinicians to encourage genetic testing in obesity. IMPACT: What does this article add to the existing literature? Genetic obesity is an expanding frontier with potential to change management. Here, we summarize current information on the genetic causes of obesity and provide guidance for genetic testing. Emerging treatments may provide targeted precise treatment and change management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Semenova
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Guo
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harry Liang
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cindy J Hernandez
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ella B John
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vidhu V Thaker
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burnett B, Parobek C, Shanahan M, Mitts M, Albrecht K, Munoz JL, Buskmiller C, Nassar AA, Sanz Cortes M, Belfort MA, Donepudi RV. Risk of Genetic Abnormality in Fetuses With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pleural Effusions. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44:1296-1303. [PMID: 39237466 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fetal pleural effusions are often associated with underlying genetic etiologies; however, data describing the incidence of genetic abnormalities are limited. We evaluated the rate of genetic abnormalities in pregnancies affected by primary unilateral and bilateral fetal pleural effusion. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort study of all patients evaluated at our center with a prenatal diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion from 2010 to 2022. All patients with a singleton pregnancy and diagnostic genetic testing were included. Patients were separated into two groups: those with unilateral or bilateral effusions at initial diagnosis. Genetic diagnoses, fetal interventions, and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Among 229 cases of fetal pleural effusion, 30 met the inclusion criteria. Unilateral effusion was seen in 14/30 cases (47%) and bilateral effusion in 16/30 cases (53%). Genetic abnormalities were present in 7/14 (50%) unilateral and 2/14 (14%) bilateral effusions (p = 0.046). Cases of bilateral effusion had higher rates of fetal intervention with thoracoamniotic shunt (69% vs. 14%; p = 0.004) and earlier delivery (33 vs. 36 weeks, p = 0.002). Bilateral effusions were found to have higher rates of respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal death (p = 0.03 and 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSION Pregnancies affected by primary fetal pleural effusion have a high rate of genetic abnormalities. Although bilateral fetal pleural effusions have worse perinatal outcomes, unilateral fetal pleural effusions have a high rate of genetic diagnosis and both unilateral and bilateral fetal pleural effusions warrant comprehensive prenatal genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Burnett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christian Parobek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Shanahan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Mitts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Albrecht
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessian L Munoz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cara Buskmiller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ahmed A Nassar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Magdalena Sanz Cortes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Belfort
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roopali V Donepudi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Fetal Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun G, Huang W, Wang L, Wu J, Zhao G, Ren H, Liu L, Kong X. Molecular findings in patients for whole exome sequencing and mitochondrial genome assessment. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 561:119774. [PMID: 38852791 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming more widely used as a diagnostic tool in the field of medicine. In this article, we reported the diagnostic yield of WES and mitochondrial genome assessment in 2226 consecutive cases in a single clinical laboratory. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive WES reports from 2226 patients with various genetic disorders. WES-process was focused exclusively on the probands and aimed at a higher diagnostic capacity. We determined the diagnostic rate of WES overall and by phenotypic category, mode of inheritance, mitochondrial genome variant, and copy number variants (CNVs). RESULTS Among the 2226 patients who had diagnostic WES proband-only, the overall diagnostic yield of WES was 34.59% (770/2226). The highest diagnostic yield was observed in autosomal dominant disorders, at 45.58% (351/770), followed by autosomal recessive at 31.95%(246/770), X-linked disorder at 9.61%(74/770), and mitochondrial diseases at a notably lower 0.65%(5/770). The 12.21% (94/770) diagnoses were based on a total of 94 copy number variants reported from WES data. CNVs in children accounted for 67.02% of the total CNVs. While majority of the molecular diagnoses were related to nuclear genes, the inclusion of mitochondrial genome sequencing in the WES test contributed to five diagnoses. all mitochondrial diseases were identified in adults. CONCLUSIONS The proband-only WES provided a definitive molecular diagnosis for 34.59% of a large cohort of patients while analysis of WES simultaneously analyzed the SNVs, exons, mitochondrial genome, and CNVs, thereby improving the diagnostic yield significantly compared to the single-detection WES method; and facilitating the identification of novel candidate genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gege Sun
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Li Wang
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jinlin Wu
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ganye Zhao
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huanan Ren
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lina Liu
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Kong
- Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schaa KL, Biesecker BB. Where is the "counseling" in prenatal genetic counseling? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108278. [PMID: 38593481 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prenatal genetic testing is routinely offered to all pregnant patients in the United States and is variably offered to certain pregnant populations globally [1]. To achieve value-based, informed decision-making, we argue for a shift away from the predominant "teaching" model of genetic counseling practice that prioritizes information and counselor dominance, toward a "counseling" model of practice that prioritizes the patient's narrative, values and beliefs. DISCUSSION Since prenatal testing began, genetic counseling has aimed to facilitate informed decision-making. Many patients are not familiar with the conditions which can be screened for prenatally or the quality of life of affected children. This lack of understanding can leave expectant parents unprepared to make informed decisions about prenatal testing. As the number of prenatal genetic tests expands, genetic counselors and all healthcare providers who discuss prenatal testing face a growing amount of information that is not feasible to explain to patients in a routine appointment. Research demonstrates that the common approach to genetic counseling, including in the prenatal setting, is the provision of biomedical information. Yet, genetic counseling outcome studies suggest that attending to the relational aspects of genetic counseling are associated with more positive patient outcomes, including enhanced knowledge, informed decision-making and greater patient satisfaction [2,3]. Through case vignettes, we illustrate the application of a counseling model of practice using Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) practice-based competencies in the domain of "Interpersonal, Psychosocial and Counseling Skills" [4]. Finally, we propose changes across the genetic counseling profession to move clinical practice toward a more relational model of care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A counseling model of genetic counseling practice leads to more positive patient outcomes [2,3]. Genetic counselors and other prenatal healthcare providers can leverage existing counseling and communication skills to support clients in value-based, informed decision-making in prenatal genetic counseling practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra L Schaa
- University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Iowa City, USA.
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH/JHU Genetic Counseling Training Program, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lledó B, Piqueras JJ, Lozano FM, Hortal M, Morales R, Ortiz JA, Guerrero J, Benabeu A, Bernabeu R. Exome sequencing in genuine empty follicle syndrome: Novel candidate genes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 297:221-226. [PMID: 38691974 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) Empty follicle syndrome (EFS) is a condition in which no oocytes are retrieved in an IVF cycle despite apparently normal follicular development and meticulous follicular aspiration following ovulation induction. The EFS is called genuine (gEFS) when the trigger administration is correct. The existence of gEFS is a subject of controversy, and it is quite rare with an undetermined etiology. Genetic defects in specific genes have been demonstrated to be responsible for this condition in some patients. Our objective was to identify novel genetic variants associated with gEFS. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a prospective observational study including 1,689 egg donors from July 2017 to February 2023. WES were performed in patients suffering gEFS. RESULTS Only 7 patients (0.41 %) exhibited gEFS after two ovarian stimulation cycles and we subsequently performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on these patients. Following stringent filtering, we identified 6 variants in 5 affected patients as pathogenic in new candidate genes which have not been previously associated with gEFS before, but which are involved in important biological processes related to folliculogenesis. These genetic variants included c.603_618del in HMMR, c.1025_1028del in LMNB1, c.1091-1G > A in TDG, c.607C > T in HABP2, c.100 + 2 T > C in HAPLN1 and c.3592_3593del in JAG2. CONCLUSION As a conclusion, we identified new candidate genes related to gEFS that expand the mutational spectrum of genes related to gEFS.This study show that WES might be an efficient tool to identify the genetic etiology of gEFS and provide further understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of gEFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belen Lledó
- Molecular Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain.
| | - Juan J Piqueras
- Molecular Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Mónica Hortal
- Molecular Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ruth Morales
- Molecular Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | - José A Ortiz
- Molecular Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jaime Guerrero
- Reproductive Biology Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | - Andrea Benabeu
- Reproductive Medicine Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain; Chair Community Medicine UMH and Health Reproductive, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Rafael Bernabeu
- Reproductive Medicine Department, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain; Chair Community Medicine UMH and Health Reproductive, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zsigmond A, Till Á, Bene J, Czakó M, Mikó A, Hadzsiev K. Case Report of Suspected Gonadal Mosaicism in FOXP1-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:5709. [PMID: 38891897 PMCID: PMC11171548 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Heterozygous mutations in the FOXP1 gene (OMIM#605515) are responsible for a well-characterized neurodevelopmental syndrome known as "intellectual developmental disorder with language impairment with or without autistic features" (OMIM#613670) or FOXP1 syndrome for short. The main features of the condition are global developmental delay/intellectual disability; speech impairment in all individuals, regardless of their level of cognitive abilities; behavioral abnormalities; congenital anomalies, including subtle dysmorphic features; and strabismus, brain, cardiac, and urogenital abnormalities. Here, we present two siblings with a de novo heterozygous FOXP1 variant, namely, a four-year-old boy and 14-month-old girl. Both children have significantly delayed early psychomotor development, hypotonia, and very similar, slightly dysmorphic facial features. A lack of expressive speech was the leading symptom in the case of the four-year-old boy. We performed whole-exome sequencing on the male patient, which identified a pathogenic heterozygous c.1541G>A (p.Arg514His) FOXP1 mutation. His sister's targeted mutation analysis also showed the same heterozygous FOXP1 variant. Segregation analysis revealed the de novo origin of the mutation, suggesting the presence of parental gonadal mosaicism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of gonadal mosaicism in FOXP1-related neurodevelopmental disorders in the medical literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Zsigmond
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Ágnes Till
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Judit Bene
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Márta Czakó
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Alexandra Mikó
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Kinga Hadzsiev
- Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7623 Pécs, Hungary; (A.Z.); (Á.T.); (J.B.); (M.C.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Azuelos C, Marquis MA, Laberge AM. A systematic review of the assessment of the clinical utility of genomic sequencing: Implications of the lack of standard definitions and measures of clinical utility. Eur J Med Genet 2024; 68:104925. [PMID: 38432472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2024.104925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) are diagnostic tests for rare genetic diseases. Studies report clinical utility of ES/GS. The goal of this systematic review is to establish how clinical utility is defined and measured in studies evaluating the impacts of ES/GS results for pediatric patients. METHODS Relevant articles were identified in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies assessed clinical utility of ES/GS for pediatric patients published before 2021. Other relevant articles were added based on articles' references. Articles were coded to assess definitions and measures of clinical utility. RESULTS Of 1346 articles, 83 articles met eligibility criteria. Clinical utility was not clearly defined in 19% of studies and 92% did not use an explicit measure of clinical utility. When present, definitions of clinical utility diverged from recommended definitions and varied greatly, from narrow (diagnostic yield of ES/GS) to broad (including decisions about withdrawal of care/palliative care and/or impacts on other family members). CONCLUSION Clinical utility is used to guide policy and practice decisions about test use. The lack of a standard definition of clinical utility of ES/GS may lead to under- or overestimations of clinical utility, complicating policymaking and raising ethical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Azuelos
- Medical Genetics, Dept of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Canada.
| | - Marc-Antoine Marquis
- Palliative Care, Dept of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Dept of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shen FX, Baum ML, Martinez-Martin N, Miner AS, Abraham M, Brownstein CA, Cortez N, Evans BJ, Germine LT, Glahn DC, Grady C, Holm IA, Hurley EA, Kimble S, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Leary K, Marks M, Monette PJ, Jukka-Pekka O, O’Rourke PP, Rauch SL, Shachar C, Sen S, Vahia I, Vassy JL, Baker JT, Bierer BE, Silverman BC. Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:69-90. [PMID: 37155651 PMCID: PMC10630534 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2180109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatry is rapidly adopting digital phenotyping and artificial intelligence/machine learning tools to study mental illness based on tracking participants' locations, online activity, phone and text message usage, heart rate, sleep, physical activity, and more. Existing ethical frameworks for return of individual research results (IRRs) are inadequate to guide researchers for when, if, and how to return this unprecedented number of potentially sensitive results about each participant's real-world behavior. To address this gap, we convened an interdisciplinary expert working group, supported by a National Institute of Mental Health grant. Building on established guidelines and the emerging norm of returning results in participant-centered research, we present a novel framework specific to the ethical, legal, and social implications of returning IRRs in digital phenotyping research. Our framework offers researchers, clinicians, and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) urgently needed guidance, and the principles developed here in the context of psychiatry will be readily adaptable to other therapeutic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis X. Shen
- Harvard Medical School
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Law School
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mason Marks
- Harvard Law School
- Florida State University College of Law
- Yale Law School
| | | | | | | | - Scott L. Rauch
- Harvard Medical School
- McLean Hospital
- Mass General Brigham
| | | | | | | | - Jason L. Vassy
- Harvard Medical School
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital
- VA Boston Healthcare System
| | | | - Barbara E. Bierer
- Harvard Medical School
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lynch F, Best S, Gaff C, Downie L, Archibald AD, Gyngell C, Goranitis I, Peters R, Savulescu J, Lunke S, Stark Z, Vears DF. Australian Public Perspectives on Genomic Newborn Screening: Risks, Benefits, and Preferences for Implementation. Int J Neonatal Screen 2024; 10:6. [PMID: 38248635 PMCID: PMC10801595 DOI: 10.3390/ijns10010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent dramatic reductions in the timeframe in which genomic sequencing can deliver results means its application in time-sensitive screening programs such as newborn screening (NBS) is becoming a reality. As genomic NBS (gNBS) programs are developed around the world, there is an increasing need to address the ethical and social issues that such initiatives raise. This study therefore aimed to explore the Australian public's perspectives and values regarding key gNBS characteristics and preferences for service delivery. We recruited English-speaking members of the Australian public over 18 years of age via social media; 75 people aged 23-72 participated in 1 of 15 focus groups. Participants were generally supportive of introducing genomic sequencing into newborn screening, with several stating that the adoption of such revolutionary and beneficial technology was a moral obligation. Participants consistently highlighted receiving an early diagnosis as the leading benefit, which was frequently linked to the potential for early treatment and intervention, or access to other forms of assistance, such as peer support. Informing parents about the test during pregnancy was considered important. This study provides insights into the Australian public's views and preferences to inform the delivery of a gNBS program in the Australian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Melbourne Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Alison D. Archibald
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Riccarda Peters
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu H, Yu H, Zhang R, Peng D, Yan D, Gu Y, Bao Y, Jia W, Zhang H, Hu C. Targeted gene panel provides advantages over whole-exome sequencing for diagnosing obesity and diabetes mellitus. J Mol Cell Biol 2023; 15:mjad040. [PMID: 37327085 PMCID: PMC10847719 DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjad040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
A small fraction of patients diagnosed with obesity or diabetes mellitus has an underlying monogenic cause. Here, we constructed a targeted gene panel consisting of 83 genes reported to be causative for monogenic obesity or diabetes. We performed this panel in 481 patients to detect causative variants and compared these results with whole-exome sequencing (WES) data available for 146 of these patients. The coverage of targeted gene panel sequencing was significantly higher than that of WES. The diagnostic yield in patients sequenced by the panel was 32.9% with subsequent WES leading to three additional diagnoses with two novel genes. In total, 178 variants in 83 genes were detected in 146 patients by targeted sequencing. Three of the 178 variants were missed by WES, although the WES-only approach had a similar diagnostic yield. For the 335 samples only receiving targeted sequencing, the diagnostic yield was 32.2%. In conclusion, taking into account the lower costs, shorter turnaround time, and higher quality of data, targeted sequencing is a more effective screening method for monogenic obesity and diabetes compared to WES. Therefore, this approach could be routinely established and used as a first-tier test in clinical practice for specific patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hairong Yu
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Haoyong Yu
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Rong Zhang
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Danfeng Peng
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Dandan Yan
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Yunjuan Gu
- Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| | - Yuqian Bao
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Weiping Jia
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Cheng Hu
- Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China
- Institute for Metabolic Disease, Fengxian Central Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shanghai 201499, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Rare diseases are a leading cause of infant mortality and lifelong disability. To improve outcomes, timely diagnosis and effective treatments are needed. Genomic sequencing has transformed the traditional diagnostic process, providing rapid, accurate and cost-effective genetic diagnoses to many. Incorporating genomic sequencing into newborn screening programmes at the population scale holds the promise of substantially expanding the early detection of treatable rare diseases, with stored genomic data potentially benefitting health over a lifetime and supporting further research. As several large-scale newborn genomic screening projects launch internationally, we review the challenges and opportunities presented, particularly the need to generate evidence of benefit and to address the ethical, legal and psychosocial issues that genomic newborn screening raises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Richard H Scott
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Genomics England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hartley T, Gillespie MK, Graham ID, Hayeems RZ, Li S, Sampson M, Boycott KM, Potter BK. Exome and genome sequencing for rare genetic disease diagnosis: A scoping review and critical appraisal of clinical guidance documents produced by genetics professional organizations. Genet Med 2023; 25:100948. [PMID: 37551668 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Exome and genome sequencing have rapidly transitioned from research methods to widely used clinical tests for diagnosing rare genetic diseases. We sought to synthesize the topics covered and appraise the development processes of clinical guidance documents generated by genetics professional organizations. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of guidance documents published since 2010, systematically identified in peer-reviewed and gray literature, using established methods and reporting guidelines. We coded verbatim recommendations by topic using content analysis and critically appraised documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. RESULTS We identified 30 guidance documents produced by 8 organizations (2012-2022), yielding 611 recommendations covering 21 topics. The most common topic related to findings beyond the primary testing indication. Mean AGREE II scores were low across all 6 quality domains; scores for items related to rigor of development were among the lowest. More recently published documents generally received higher scores. CONCLUSION Guidance documents included a broad range of recommendations but were of low quality, particularly in their rigor of development. Developers should consider using tools such as AGREE II and basing recommendations on living knowledge syntheses to improve guidance development in this evolving space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taila Hartley
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Meredith K Gillespie
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheena Li
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Sampson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kym M Boycott
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith HS, Bonkowski ES, Hickingbotham MR, Pereira S, May T, Guerrini CJ. Clinically Indicated Genomic Sequencing of Children in Foster Care: Legal and Ethical Issues. J Pediatr 2023; 262:113612. [PMID: 37468037 PMCID: PMC10792112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
There are approximately 400 000 children in foster care in the US, approximately one-half of whom have chronic health problems and approximately 10% of whom have complex healthcare needs. Given the increasing relevance of genomic sequencing to guide clinical care for children with rare, chronic, and undiagnosed conditions, it may be an important component of diagnostic evaluation for children in foster care. Clinically indicated genomic sequencing may provide information that has health implications for children in foster care, as well as for their biological parents and other relatives. Whether and how genomic sequencing results impact legal decision making and family court outcomes is not yet well-understood. We describe scenarios that highlight legal, ethical, and policy issues surrounding genomic sequencing for children in foster care using 3 cases adapted from real-world events. Together, these cases highlight important yet underexplored issues that arise when genomic information has legal relevance in family court and ethical implications for child and family well-being. As genomic sequencing becomes more routine for the general pediatric population, additional research is needed to better understand its impacts on children and other stakeholders within the foster care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Department of Population Medicine, Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Emily S Bonkowski
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; University of Washington Institute for Public Health Genetics, Seattle, WA
| | - Madison R Hickingbotham
- Department of Population Medicine, Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas May
- Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
| | - Christi J Guerrini
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Diderich KEM, Klapwijk JE, van der Schoot V, van den Born M, Wilke M, Joosten M, Stuurman KE, Hoefsloot LH, Van Opstal D, Brüggenwirth HT, Srebniak MI. The role of a multidisciplinary team in managing variants of uncertain clinical significance in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Eur J Med Genet 2023; 66:104844. [PMID: 37709011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2023.104844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although in general prenatal exome sequencing only reports (likely) pathogenic variants, in some cases a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) is disclosed. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the types of VUS that have been reported to prospective parents, possible reclassification and to design a standard flow chart to determine which types of VUS could be considered for reporting in prenatal settings. Furthermore, we investigated what the crucial elements are to facilitate rapid management of uncertain results in a prenatal setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed exome results from 451 pregnancies performed in 2019-2021. We analyzed which factors that were taken into account by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) contributed towards decision making on reporting VUS after prenatal exome sequencing. RESULTS In 9/451 (2%) pregnancies tested with exome sequencing using a broad panel analysis a VUS was reported. After birth 3/9 VUS could be reclassified to likely pathogenic variants based on new clinical follow up data. We considered reporting VUS in genes: 1) matching the fetal phenotype, 2) associated with a severe disorder when a functional test is available or 3) possibly associated with a disorder where early post-partum diagnosis and treatment are crucial for a better prognosis. Two flowcharts were designed to guide first the laboratory specialist and then the MDT in decisions on reporting VUS. The crucial elements that enabled timely decisions on VUS disclosure were regular meetings, appropriate expertise, professional connections with other experts and psychological safety within the MDT. CONCLUSION In this study three out of nine VUS could be re-classified as likely pathogenic after clinical follow-up. In order to protect pregnant couples from the burden of uncertain results, the genetic professionals have to take the responsibility to limit the reporting of VUS. This can be done not only by automated filtering of data, by following professional guidelines and by building standardized decision flows, but also by discussing individual cases considering personal situations and the involved disease and by sharing professional experience and responsibility in a multidisciplinary prenatal team setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin E M Diderich
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jasmijn E Klapwijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vyne van der Schoot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myrthe van den Born
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martina Wilke
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke Joosten
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kyra E Stuurman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lies H Hoefsloot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diane Van Opstal
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hennie T Brüggenwirth
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata I Srebniak
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vaseghi H, Akrami SM, Rashidi‐Nezhad A. The challenges in the interpretation of genetic variants detected by genomics techniques in patients with congenital anomalies. J Clin Lab Anal 2023; 37:e24967. [PMID: 37823350 PMCID: PMC10623530 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the efforts that have been made to standardize the interpretation of variants, in some cases, their pathogenicity remains vague and confusing, and sometimes their interpretation does not help clinicians to establish clinical correlation using genetic test results. This study aims to shed more lights on these challenging variants. METHODS In a clinical setting, the variants found from 81 array CGH and 79 whole exome sequencing (WES) in patients with congenital anomalies were interpreted based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. RESULTS In this study, the interpretation of the disease-causing variants and the variants with uncertain clinical significance detected by WES was far more challenging than the variants detected by array CGH. The presence of unreported clinical symptoms, incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, parents' reluctance to analyze segregation in the family, and the limitations of prenatal tests, were among the challenging factors in the interpretation of variants in this study. CONCLUSION A careful study of the pedigree and disease mode of inheritance, as well as a careful clinical examination of the carrier parents in diseases with autosomal dominant inheritance, are among the primary strategies for determining the clinical significance of the variants. Continued efforts to mitigate these challenges are needed to improve the interpretation of variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajar Vaseghi
- Department of Medical Genetics, School of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Seyed Mohammad Akrami
- Department of Medical Genetics, School of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Ali Rashidi‐Nezhad
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Family Health Research InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wolf SM, Green RC. Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2023; 24:393-414. [PMID: 36913714 PMCID: PMC10497726 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Genome sequencing is increasingly used in research and integrated into clinical care. In the research domain, large-scale analyses, including whole genome sequencing with variant interpretation and curation, virtually guarantee identification of variants that are pathogenic or likely pathogenic and actionable. Multiple guidelines recommend that findings associated with actionable conditions be offered to research participants in order to demonstrate respect for autonomy, reciprocity, and participant interests in health and privacy. Some recommendations go further and support offering a wider range of findings, including those that are not immediately actionable. In addition, entities covered by the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) may be required to provide a participant's raw genomic data on request. Despite these widely endorsed guidelines and requirements, the implementation of return of genomic results and data by researchers remains uneven. This article analyzes the ethical and legal foundations for researcher duties to offer adult participants their interpreted results and raw data as the new normal in genomic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Law School and Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA;
| | - Robert C Green
- Genomes2People Research Program, Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, and Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lledo B, Marco A, Morales R, Ortiz JA, García-Hernández E, Lozano FM, Cascales A, Guerrero J, Bernabeu A, Bernabeu R. Identification of novel candidate genes associated with meiotic aneuploidy in human embryos by whole-exome sequencing. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:1755-1763. [PMID: 37171739 PMCID: PMC10352178 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02825-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify novel genetic variants responsible for meiotic embryonic aneuploidy. METHODS A prospective observational cohort study that included 29 couples who underwent trophectoderm biopsies from 127 embryos and performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) between November 2019 and March 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the expected embryo aneuploidy rate based on maternal age. RESULTS After variant filtering in the WES analysis of 58 patients/donors, five heterozygous variants were identified in female partners from the study group that had an impact on embryo aneuploidy. Additionally, a slowdown in embryo development and a decrease in the number of blastocysts available for biopsy were observed in the study group embryos. CONCLUSION This study has identified new candidate genes and variants not previously associated with meiotic embryo aneuploidy, but which are involved in important biological processes related to cell division and chromosome segregation. WES may be an efficient tool to identify patients with a higher-than-expected risk of embryo aneuploidy based on maternal age and allow for individualized genetic counselling prior to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Lledo
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain.
| | - A Marco
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | - R Morales
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | - J A Ortiz
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - F M Lozano
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | - A Cascales
- Instituto Bernabeu Biotech, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | - J Guerrero
- Instituto Bernabeu of Fertility and Gynaecology, 03016, Alicante, Spain
| | - A Bernabeu
- Instituto Bernabeu of Fertility and Gynaecology, 03016, Alicante, Spain
- Cátedra de Medicina Comunitaria y Salud Reproductiva, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - R Bernabeu
- Instituto Bernabeu of Fertility and Gynaecology, 03016, Alicante, Spain
- Cátedra de Medicina Comunitaria y Salud Reproductiva, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Diderich KEM, Klapwijk JE, van der Schoot V, Brüggenwirth HT, Joosten M, Srebniak MI. Challenges and Pragmatic Solutions in Pre-Test and Post-Test Genetic Counseling for Prenatal Exome Sequencing. Appl Clin Genet 2023; 16:89-97. [PMID: 37216148 PMCID: PMC10198275 DOI: 10.2147/tacg.s411185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The yield of genetic prenatal diagnosis has been notably improved by introducing whole genome chromosomal microarray (CMA) and prenatal exome sequencing (pES). However, together with increased numbers of diagnoses made, the need to manage challenging findings such as variants of unknown significance (VUS) and incidental findings (IF) also increased. We have summarized the current guidelines and recommendations and we have shown current solutions used in our tertiary center in the Netherlands. We discuss four of the most common clinical situations: fetus with normal pES results, fetus with a pathogenic finding explaining the fetal phenotype, fetus with a variant of uncertain clinical significance fitting the phenotype and fetus with a variant leading to an incidental diagnosis. Additionally, we reflect on solutions in order to facilitate genetic counseling in an NGS-era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Marieke Joosten
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Prior-de Castro C, Gómez-González C, Rodríguez-López R, Macher HC. Prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases. ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE 2023; 4:28-51. [PMID: 37359899 PMCID: PMC10197187 DOI: 10.1515/almed-2023-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases is a process involving the use of a variety of molecular techniques for the molecular characterization of a potential monogenic disease in the fetus during pregnancy. Prenatal genetic diagnosis can be performed through invasive and non-invasive methods. A distinction must be made between "NIPD" (non-invasive prenatal diagnosis), which is considered to be diagnostic, from "NIPT" (non-invasive prenatal test), which is a screening test that requires subsequent confirmation by invasive methods. The different techniques currently available aim at detecting either, previously characterized pathogenic mutations in the family, the risk haplotype associated with the familial mutation, or potential pathogenic mutation(s) in a gene associated with a diagnostic suspicion. An overview is provided of relevant aspects of prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases. The objective of this paper is to describe the main molecular techniques currently available and used in clinical practice. A description is provided of the indications, limitations and analytical recommendations regarding these techniques, and the standards governing genetic counseling. Continuous rapid advances in the clinical applications of genomics have provided increased access to comprehensive molecular characterization. Laboratories are struggling to keep in pace with technology developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raquel Rodríguez-López
- Laboratorio de Genética, Servicio Análisis Clínicos, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Hada C. Macher
- Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Sevilla, IBIS, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - on behalf of the Prenatal Diagnosis Commission and the Genetics Commission of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine
- Servicio de Genética, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- Laboratorio de Genética, Servicio Análisis Clínicos, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
- Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Sevilla, IBIS, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Whiwon L, Salma S, Daniel A, Stephanie L, Marc C, Cherith S, Abby T, Angela S, Robin H, Yvonne B. Patient-facing digital tools for delivering genetic services: a systematic review. J Med Genet 2023; 60:1-10. [PMID: 36137613 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This study systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of digital genetics tools on patient care and system efficiencies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2010 and March 2021. Studies evaluating the use of patient-facing digital tools in the context of genetic service delivery were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted patient-reported and system-focused outcomes from each study. Data were synthesised using a descriptive approach. Of 3226 unique studies identified, 87 were included. A total of 70 unique digital tools were identified. As a result of using digital tools, 84% of studies reported a positive outcome in at least one of the following patient outcomes: knowledge, psychosocial well-being, behavioural/management changes, family communication, decision-making or level of engagement. Digital tools improved workflow and efficiency for providers and reduced the amount of time they needed to spend with patients. However, we identified a misalignment between study purpose and patient-reported outcomes measured and a lack of tools that encompass the entire genetic counselling and testing trajectory. Given increased demand for genetic services and the shift towards virtual care, this review provides evidence that digital tools can be used to efficiently deliver patient-centred care. Future research should prioritise development, evaluation and implementation of digital tools that can support the entire patient trajectory across a range of clinical settings. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020202862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Whiwon
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shickh Salma
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Assamad Daniel
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luca Stephanie
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clausen Marc
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Somerville Cherith
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tafler Abby
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaw Angela
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hayeems Robin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bombard Yvonne
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Senaratne TN, Saitta SC. Evaluating Genetic Disorders in the Neonate: The Role of Exome Sequencing in the NICU. Neoreviews 2022; 23:e829-e840. [PMID: 36450644 DOI: 10.1542/neo.23-12-e829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
With recent advances in the technologies used for genetic diagnosis as well as our understanding of the genetic basis of disease, a growing list of options is available for providers when caring for a newborn with features suggesting an underlying genetic etiology. The choice of the most appropriate genetic test for a specific situation includes clinical considerations such as the phenotypic features and type of genetic abnormality suspected, as well as practical considerations such as cost and turnaround time. In this review, we discuss clinical exome sequencing in the context of genetic evaluation of newborns, including technical considerations, variant interpretation, and incidental/secondary findings. Strengths and limitations of exome sequencing are discussed and compared with those of other commonly known tests such as karyotype analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and sequencing panels, along with integration of results from prenatal testing if available. We also review future directions including genome sequencing and other emerging technologies that are starting to be used in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Niroshi Senaratne
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sulagna C Saitta
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Reproductive Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ng KWP, Chin HL, Chin AXY, Goh DLM. Using gene panels in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders: A mini-review. Front Neurol 2022; 13:997551. [PMID: 36313509 PMCID: PMC9602396 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.997551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of inherited neuromuscular disorders is challenging due to their genetic and phenotypic variability. Traditionally, neurophysiology and histopathology were primarily used in the initial diagnostic approach to these conditions. Sanger sequencing for molecular diagnosis was less frequently utilized as its application was a time-consuming and cost-intensive process. The advent and accessibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the evaluation process of genetically heterogenous neuromuscular disorders. Current NGS diagnostic testing approaches include gene panels, whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Gene panels are often the most widely used, being more accessible due to availability and affordability. In this mini-review, we describe the benefits and risks of clinical genetic testing. We also discuss the utility, benefits, challenges, and limitations of using gene panels in the evaluation of neuromuscular disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay W. P. Ng
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui-Lin Chin
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Paediatrics, Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amanda X. Y. Chin
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Denise Li-Meng Goh
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Paediatrics, Khoo Teck Puat - National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee G, Yu L, Suarez CJ, Stevenson DA, Ling A, Killer L. Factors associated with the time to complete clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric patient population. Genet Med 2022; 24:2028-2033. [PMID: 35951015 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Exome sequencing (ES) is becoming increasingly important for diagnosing rare genetic disorders. Patients and clinicians face several barriers when attempting to obtain ES. This study is aimed to describe factors associated with a longer time interval between provider recommendation of testing and sample collection for ES. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted for insurance-authorized, completed pediatric ES in which initial requests were reviewed by Stanford's Genetic Testing Optimization Service between November 2018 and December 2019. Regression analysis was used to determine the association between the geocoded median household income and 3 different time point intervals defined as time to test, insurance decision, and scheduling/consent. RESULTS Of the 281 charts reviewed, 115 cases were included in the final cohort. The average time from provider preauthorization request to sample collection took 104.4 days, and income was negatively correlated with the length of the insurance decision interval. CONCLUSION Pediatric patients undergo a lengthy, uncertain process when attempting to obtain ES, some of which is associated with income. More research and clinician interventions are required to clarify specific socioeconomic factors that influence the ability to obtain timely ES and develop optimal protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Lee
- Human Genetics and Genetic Counseling Master's Program, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Linbo Yu
- Stanford Hospitals and Clinics Genetic Testing Optimization Service, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Carlos J Suarez
- Stanford Hospitals and Clinics Genetic Testing Optimization Service, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - David A Stevenson
- Stanford Hospitals and Clinics Genetic Testing Optimization Service, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Albee Ling
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Lindsay Killer
- Stanford Hospitals and Clinics Genetic Testing Optimization Service, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Genetic and Clinical Approach To Microcephaly: A 5-Year Single Center Experience. J Pediatr Genet 2022; 11:110-116. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMicrocephaly is a dysmorphic feature characterized by small head size more than two standard deviations below the mean for age, sex, and ethnicity. There are several etiological factors ranging from environmental toxins or infections to genetic disorders. We report clinical, radiological, and molecular genetic investigations of patients with microcephaly from a single center over 5-year period. There were 92 patients with a genetic diagnosis. Based on their genetic diagnosis, we grouped patients into three categories: (1) microcephaly with copy number variations (CNVs), (2) microcephaly with single gene disorders, and (3) microcephaly with aneuploidies. The most common category was aneuploidy in 59% of the patients, followed by single gene disorders in 23% of the patients and CNVs in 18% of the patients. We think that history and physical examination guide physicians to choose the most appropriate genetic testing to identify underlying diagnosis.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pauta M, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Borrell A. Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2022; 59:715-722. [PMID: 35041238 DOI: 10.1002/uog.24862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) above that of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies (at least two major anomalies in different anatomical systems). METHOD This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane database, we identified studies describing ES, whole-genome and/or next-generation sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations. Included were observational studies involving five or more eligible fetuses. A fetus was eligible for inclusion if it had at least two major anomalies of different anatomical systems and a negative CMA or karyotyping result. Only positive variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. A negative CMA or karyotype result was treated as the reference standard. The diagnostic yield of the primary outcome was calculated by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic yield of the solo approach (fetus alone sequenced) with that of the trio approach (fetus and both parents sequenced). RESULTS Seventeen articles with data on ES diagnostic yield, including 694 individuals with multisystem malformations, were identified. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant potentially causative of the fetal phenotype was found in 213 fetuses, giving a 33% (95% CI, 27-40%) incremental yield of ES. A stratified analysis showed similar diagnostic yields of ES using the solo approach (30%; 95% CI, 11-52%) and the trio approach (35%; 95% CI, 26-44%). CONCLUSIONS ES applied in fetuses with multisystem structural anomalies was able to identify a potentially causative gene when CMA or karyotyping had failed to do so in an additional one-third of cases. No differences were observed between the solo and trio approaches for ES. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pauta
- BCNatal, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - R J Martinez-Portilla
- Clinical Research Division, Evidence-Based Medicine Department, National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - A Borrell
- BCNatal, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Barcelona Centre for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (BCNatal), Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Michie M, Allyse MA. What Really Matters Now in Prenatal Genetics. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:31-33. [PMID: 35089842 PMCID: PMC9113030 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2013990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
|
30
|
Stark Z, Ellard S. Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care? Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:142-149. [PMID: 34744166 PMCID: PMC8821543 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00990-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid genomic testing in critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients has transformed the paradigm of rare disease diagnosis, delivering results in real time to inform patient management. More than 20 studies totalling over 1500 patients from diverse healthcare settings worldwide have now been published, forming a compelling evidence base for healthcare system implementation. We review the reported diagnostic and clinical outcomes, as well as broader evaluations of family and professional experiences, cost effectiveness, implementation challenges and bioethical issues arising from rapid testing. As rapid genomic testing transitions from the research to the healthcare setting to become a 'standard of care' test, there is a need to develop effective service delivery models to support scalability at both the laboratory and clinical level and promote equity of access, prompt test initiation, integrated multidisciplinary input and holistic family support. Harnessing the high level of professional engagement with rapid genomic testing programmes will continue to drive innovation and adoption, while close integration with emerging precision medicine approaches will be necessary to deliver on the promise of reduced infant and child mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1058.c0000 0000 9442 535XVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Sian Ellard
- grid.419309.60000 0004 0495 6261Exeter Genomics Laboratory, South West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK ,grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nestor JG, Li AJ, King KL, Husain SA, McIntosh TJ, Sawinski D, Iltis AS, Goodman MS, Walsh HA, DuBois JM, Mohan S. Impact of education on APOL1 testing attitudes among prospective living kidney donors. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14516. [PMID: 34661305 PMCID: PMC9113661 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
It is unknown how providing prospective living donors with information about APOL1, including the benefits and drawbacks of testing, influences their desire for testing. In this study, we surveyed 102 participants with self-reported African ancestry and positive family history of kidney disease, recruited from our nephrology waiting room. We assessed views on APOL1 testing before and after presentation of a set of potential benefits and drawbacks of testing and quantified the self-reported level of influence individual benefits and drawbacks had on participants' desire for testing in the proposed context of living donation. The majority of participants (92%) were aware of organ donation and more than half (56%) had considered living donation. And though we found no significant change in response following presentation of the potential benefits and the drawbacks of APOL1 testing by study end significance, across all participants, "becoming aware of the potential risk of kidney disease among your immediate family" was the benefit with the highest mean influence (3.3±1.4), while the drawback with the highest mean influence (2.9±1.5) was "some transplant centers may not allow you to donate to a loved one". This study provides insights into the priorities of prospective living donors and suggests concern for how the information affects family members may strongly influence desires for testing. It also highlights the need for greater community engagement to gain a deeper understanding of the priorities that influence decision making on APOL1 testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan G. Nestor
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amber J. Li
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tristan J. McIntosh
- Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Deirdre Sawinski
- Department of Medicine, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ana S. Iltis
- Center for Bioethics Health and Society and Department of Philosophy, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melody S. Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Heidi A. Walsh
- Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - James M. DuBois
- Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Klapwijk JE, Srebniak MI, Go ATJI, Govaerts LCP, Lewis C, Hammond J, Hill M, Lou S, Vogel I, Ormond KE, Diderich KEM, Brüggenwirth HT, Riedijk SR. How to deal with uncertainty in prenatal genomics: A systematic review of guidelines and policies. Clin Genet 2021; 100:647-658. [PMID: 34155632 PMCID: PMC8596644 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Exome sequencing (ES) enhanced the diagnostic yield of genetic testing, but has also increased the possibility of uncertain findings. Prenatal ES is increasingly being offered after a fetal abnormality is detected through ultrasound. It is important to know how to handle uncertainty in this particularly stressful period. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of guidelines available for addressing uncertainty related to prenatal chromosomal microarray (CMA) and ES. Ten uncertainty types associated with prenatal ES and CMA were identified and defined by an international multidisciplinary team. Medline (all) and Embase were systematically searched. Laboratory scientists, clinical geneticists, psychologists, and a fetal medicine specialist screened the papers and performed the data extraction. Nineteen papers were included. Recommendations generally emphasized the importance of trio analysis, clinical information, data sharing, validation and re-analysis, protocols, multidisciplinary teams, genetic counselling, whether to limit the possible scope of results, and when to report particular findings. This systematic review helps provide a vocabulary for uncertainties, and a compass to navigate uncertainties. Prenatal CMA and ES guidelines provide a strong starting point for determining how to handle uncertainty. Gaps in guidelines and recommendations were identified and discussed to provide direction for future research and policy making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Attie T. J. I. Go
- Department of Obstetrics and Fetal MedicineErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
- Population, Policy and Practice DepartmentUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
- Genetic and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
- Genetic and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal DiagnosticsAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal DiagnosticsAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Kelly E. Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical EthicsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Sam R. Riedijk
- Department of Clinical GeneticsErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gopan A, Sarma MS. Mitochondrial hepatopathy: Respiratory chain disorders- ‘breathing in and out of the liver’. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1707-1726. [PMID: 34904040 PMCID: PMC8637684 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mitochondria, the powerhouse of a cell, are closely linked to the pathophysiology of various common as well as not so uncommon disorders of the liver and beyond. Evolution supports a prokaryotic descent, and, unsurprisingly, the organelle is worthy of being labeled an organism in itself. Since highly metabolically active organs require a continuous feed of energy, any dysfunction in the structure and function of mitochondria can have variable impact, with the worse end of the spectrum producing catastrophic consequences with a multisystem predisposition. Though categorized a hepatopathy, mitochondrial respiratory chain defects are not limited to the liver in time and space. The liver involvement is also variable in clinical presentation as well as in age of onset, from acute liver failure, cholestasis, or chronic liver disease. Other organs like eye, muscle, central and peripheral nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, hematological, endocrine, and renal systems are also variably involved. Diagnosis hinges on recognition of subtle clinical clues, screening metabolic investigations, evaluation of the extra-hepatic involvement, and role of genetics and tissue diagnosis. Treatment is aimed at both circumventing the acute metabolic crisis and long-term management including nutritional rehabilitation. This review lists and discusses the burden of mitochondrial respiratory chain defects, including various settings when to suspect, their evolution with time, including certain specific disorders, their tiered evaluation with diagnostic algorithms, management dilemmas, role of liver transplantation, and the future research tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrit Gopan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth G.S Medical College and K.E.M Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Moinak Sen Sarma
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Burdon KP. The utility of genomic testing in the ophthalmology clinic: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 49:615-625. [PMID: 34231298 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Genomic testing assesses many genes in one test. It is often used in the diagnosis of heterogeneous single gene disorders where pathogenic variation in one of many genes are known to cause similar phenotypes, or where a clinical diagnosis is difficult to reach. In the ophthalmic setting, genomic testing can be used to diagnose several groups of diseases, including inherited retinal dystrophies, paediatric cataract, glaucoma and anterior segment dysgenesis and other syndromic developmental disorders with eye involvement. The testing can encompass several modalities ranging from whole genome sequencing to exome sequencing or targeted gene panels. The advantages to the patient of receiving a molecular diagnosis include an end to the diagnostic odyssey, determination of prognosis and clarification of treatment, access to accurate genetic counselling, and confirming eligibility for clinical trials or genetic specific therapies. Genomic testing is a powerful addition to the diagnosis and management of inherited eye disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn P Burdon
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chandrasekar T, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Overview of Prostate Cancer Genetic Testing. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:279-282. [PMID: 34210484 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - William K Kelly
- Medical Oncology and Urology, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. https://twitter.com/LeonardGomella
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dragojlovic N, Kopac N, Borle K, Tandun R, Salmasi S, Ellis U, Birch P, Adam S, Friedman JM, Elliott AM, Lynd LD. Utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries: A scoping review. Health Policy 2021; 125:877-887. [PMID: 33962789 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Ongoing rapid growth in the need for genetic services has the potential to severely strain the capacity of the clinical genetics workforce to deliver this care. Unfortunately, assessments of the scale of this health policy challenge and potential solutions are hampered by the lack of a consolidated evidence base on the growth in genetic service utilization. To enable health policy research and strategic planning by health systems in this area, we conducted a scoping review of the literature on the utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries published between 2010 and 2018. One-hundred-and-ninety-five unique studies were included in the review. Most focused on cancer (85/195; 44%) and prenatal care (50/195; 26%), which are consistently the two areas with the greatest volume of genetic service utilization in both the United States and other high-income countries. Utilization and uptake rates varied considerably and were influenced by contextual factors including health system characteristics, provider knowledge, and patient preferences. Moreover, growth in genetic service utilization appears to be driven to a significant degree by technological advances and the integration of new tests into clinical care. Our review highlights both the policy challenge posed by the rapid growth in the utilization of genetic services and the variability in this trend across clinical indications and health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Nicola Kopac
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Kennedy Borle
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rachel Tandun
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Shahrzad Salmasi
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ursula Ellis
- Woodward Library, University of British Columbia, 2198 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Patricia Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada; BC Women's Hospital Research Institute, H214 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, 588-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Karimi E, Mahmoudian F, Reyes SOL, Bargir UA, Madkaikar M, Artac H, Sabzevari A, Lu N, Azizi G, Abolhassani H. Approach to genetic diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity through next-generation sequencing. Mol Immunol 2021; 137:57-66. [PMID: 34216999 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) present with a heterogeneous clinical and immunological phenotype, therefore a correct molecular diagnosis is crucial for the classification and subsequent therapeutic management. On the other hand, IEI are a group of rare congenital diseases with highly diverse features and, in most cases, an as yet unknown genetic etiology. Next generation sequencing has facilitated genetic examinations of rare inherited disorders during the recent years, thus allowing a suitable molecular diagnosis in the IEI patients. This review aimed to investigate the current findings about these techniques in the field of IEI, suggesting an efficient stepwise approach to molecular diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmat Karimi
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA; Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Mahmoudian
- Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saul O Lugo Reyes
- Immune Deficiencies Lab, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Umair Ahmed Bargir
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Leukocyte Biology, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, India
| | - Manisha Madkaikar
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Leukocyte Biology, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, India
| | - Hasibe Artac
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Araz Sabzevari
- CinnaGen Medical Biotechnology Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Na Lu
- State Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Gholamreza Azizi
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
| | - Hassan Abolhassani
- Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran; Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Population Genomic Screening for Genetic Etiologies of Neurodevelopmental/Psychiatric Disorders Demonstrates Personal Utility and Positive Participant Responses. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050365. [PMID: 34062946 PMCID: PMC8147408 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic variants that cause neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders (NPD) are relatively prevalent and highly penetrant. This study aimed to understand adults’ immediate responses to receiving NPD-related results to inform inclusion in population-based genomic screening programs. Nine recurrent, pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) were identified from research exome data, clinically confirmed, and disclosed to adult participants of the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative DiscovEHR cohort by experienced genetic counselors. A subset of in-person genetic counseling sessions (n = 27) were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using a grounded theory approach. Participant reactions were overwhelmingly positive and indicated that an NPD genetic etiology was highly valuable and personally useful. Participants frequently reported learning disabilities or other NPD that were not documented in their electronic health records and noted difficulties obtaining support for NPD needs. Most intended to share their genetic result with family members and health care providers and were interested in how their result could improve their healthcare. This study indicates that results from population-based NPD genomic screening can provide personal value for adults with NPD, were viewed positively by participants, and could improve clinical outcomes by informing symptom monitoring for NPD and co-morbidities, promoting improved health behaviors, and enhancing psychotherapeutic approaches.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abicht A, Schön U, Laner A, Holinski-Feder E, Diebold I. Actionable secondary findings in arrhythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy genes: impact and challenge of genetic counseling. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2021; 11:637-649. [PMID: 33968641 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Comprehensive genetic analysis yields in a higher diagnostic rate but also in a higher number of secondary findings (SF). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) published a list of 59 actionable genes for which disease causing sequence variants are recommended to be reported as SF including 27 genes linked to inherited cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as arrhythmia syndromes, cardiomyopathies and vascular and connective tissue disorders. One of the selected conditions represented in the actionable gene list is the arrhythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy (ARVC), an inherited heart muscle disease with a particularly high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Since clinical symptoms are frequently absent before SCD, a genetic finding is a promising option for early diagnosis and possible intervention. However, the variant interpretation and the decision to return a SF is still challenging. Methods To determine the frequency of medically actionable SF linked to CVD we analyzed data of 6,605 individuals who underwent high throughput sequencing for noncardiac diagnostic requests. In particular, we critically assessed and classified the variants in the ARVC genes: DSC2, DSG2, DSP, PKP2 and TMEM43 and compared our findings with the population-based genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and ARVC-afflicted individuals listed in ClinVar and ARVC database. Results 1% (69/6,605) of tested individuals carried pathogenic SF in one of the 27 genes linked to CVD, of them 13 individuals (0.2%) carried a pathogenic SF in a ARVC gene. Overall, 582 rare variants were identified in all five ARVC genes, 96% of the variants were missense variants and 4% putative LoF variants (pLoF): frameshift, start/stop-gain/loss, splice-site. Finally, we selected 13 of the 24 pLoF variants as pathogenic SF by careful data interpretation. Conclusions Since SF in actionable ARVC genes can allow early detection and prevention of disease and SCD, detected variant must undergo rigorous clinical and laboratory evaluation before it can be described as pathogenic and returned to patients. Returning a SF to a patient should be interdisciplinary, it needs genetic counselling and clinicians experienced in inherited heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Abicht
- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Isabel Diebold
- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.,Department of Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hopkins MK, Dugoff L, Kuller JA. Exome Sequencing and Its Emerging Role in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021; 75:317-320. [PMID: 32469417 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000000787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Importance Prenatal genetic diagnosis can guide pregnancy management and decision making. Genetic diagnosis has advanced rapidly, and chromosomal microarray has become widely used, in addition to conventional karyotype. Exome sequencing may provide an even higher detection rate of genetic anomalies and may be more commonly applied in the future. Objectives The objectives of this manuscript are to review current practices in prenatal genetic diagnosis, define exome sequencing, identify scenarios in which exome sequencing may be indicated, identify potential concerns regarding exome sequencing, and review the importance for the general obstetrician-gynecologist to understand exome sequencing technology and its uses. Evidence Acquisition A MEDLINE search of "prenatal genetic testing," "chromosomal microarray," "conventional karyotype," or "exome sequencing" in the review was performed. Results The evidence cited in this review includes 6 medical society committee opinions and 17 additional peer-reviewed journal articles that were original research or expert opinion summaries. Conclusions and Relevance Exome sequencing may be a useful prenatal genetic diagnostic tool in cases with ultrasound anomalies with previously normal chromosomal microarray and/or karyotype. As more data become available, technology improves, and costs fall, exome sequencing may become more widely used in prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorraine Dugoff
- Professor, Divisions of Reproductive Genetics and Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey A Kuller
- Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Xia-Gibbs syndrome (XGS) is a rare genetic disorder that has been discovered as a distinct clinical entity in the recent past. The occurrence has been attributed to the mutation of AT Hook DNA binding motif Containing 1 (AHDC1) gene that is carried on chromosome 1p36. The concerned gene participates in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair apart from other crucial functions. The mutation results in dysfunction that leads to neurodevelopmental delay. The spectrum of manifestations constitutes intellectual disabilities, hypotonia, expressive language delay, sleep difficulties, and short stature. Dysmorphic facial features include depressed nasal bridge, hypertelorism, down-slanting or up-slanting palpebral fissures, horizontal eyebrows, dysplastic dentition, thin upper lip vermilion, and micrognathia. The phenotype is still expanding. The condition may range from mild to severe dysfunction depending on the area and site of genetic aberration but variation is evident. Thus, the correlation between genotype and phenotype is largely unclear. XGS should be considered as a differential diagnosis for patients presenting with intellectual as well as developmental disabilities. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is the genetic test that is largely used for the confirmation of diagnosis. Less is known about the natural history as only a few adults with XGS have been documented in the literature. Age-appropriate cancer screening is recommended for patients with XGS as the gene mutation alters DNA repair mechanisms that may trigger tumour formation. The management of patients diagnosed with XGS is an area that needs investigation. Though use of growth hormone replacement therapy and physiotherapy intervention have been reported as effective in previous studies, research on effective means of care of these patients is warranted on a larger number of patients. We present a review of current literature on what is known about XGS that would facilitate to identify knowledge gaps for paving a way for further studies. This, in turn, will help in provision of early and effective rehabilitation services for patients with XGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanan Goyal
- Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Waqar M Naqvi
- Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Arti Sahu
- Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Ashish S Aujla
- Paediatric Neurology, Kids Care Paediatric Neurology Center, Raipur, IND
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Martin CL, Wain KE, Oetjens MT, Tolwinski K, Palen E, Hare-Harris A, Habegger L, Maxwell EK, Reid JG, Walsh LK, Myers SM, Ledbetter DH. Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population. JAMA Psychiatry 2020; 77:1276-1285. [PMID: 32697297 PMCID: PMC7376464 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic causes; yet, access to genetic diagnosis is limited. We explored whether inclusion of NPD in population-based genomic screening programs is warranted by assessing 3 key factors: prevalence, penetrance, and personal utility. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the suitability of including pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) associated with NPD in population screening by determining their prevalence and penetrance and exploring the personal utility of disclosing results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cohort study, the frequency of 31 NPD CNVs was determined in patient-participants via exome data. Associated clinical phenotypes were assessed using linked electronic health records. Nine CNVs were selected for disclosure by licensed genetic counselors, and participants' psychosocial reactions were evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A primarily adult population receiving medical care at Geisinger, a large integrated health care system in the United States with the only population-based genomic screening program approved for medically relevant results disclosure, was included. The cohort was identified from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. Exome and linked electronic health record data were available for this cohort, which was recruited from February 2007 to April 2017. Data were collected for the qualitative analysis April 2017 through February 2018. Analysis began February 2018 and ended December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The planned outcomes of this study include (1) prevalence estimate of NPD-associated CNVs in an unselected health care system population; (2) penetrance estimate of NPD diagnoses in CNV-positive individuals; and (3) qualitative themes that describe participants' responses to receiving NPD-associated genomic results. RESULTS Of 90 595 participants with CNV data, a pathogenic CNV was identified in 708 (0.8%; 436 women [61.6%]; mean [SD] age, 50.04 [18.74] years). Seventy percent (n = 494) had at least 1 associated clinical symptom. Of these, 28.8% (204) of CNV-positive individuals had an NPD code in their electronic health record, compared with 13.3% (11 835 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.86-2.61; P < .001); 66.4% (470) of CNV-positive individuals had a history of depression and anxiety compared with 54.6% (49 118 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; P < .001). 16p13.11 (71 [0.078%]) and 22q11.2 (108 [0.119%]) were the most prevalent deletions and duplications, respectively. Only 5.8% of individuals (41 of 708) had a previously known genetic diagnosis. Results disclosure was completed for 141 individuals. Positive participant responses included poignant reactions to learning a medical reason for lifelong cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study informs critical factors central to the development of population-based genomic screening programs and supports the inclusion of NPD in future designs to promote equitable access to clinically useful genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Lese Martin
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E. Wain
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew T. Oetjens
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Kasia Tolwinski
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania,Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Palen
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott M. Myers
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David H. Ledbetter
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
For decades, prenatal testing has been offered to evaluate pregnancies for genetic conditions. In recent years, the number of testing options and range of testing capabilities has dramatically increased. Because of the risks associated with invasive diagnostic testing, research has focused on the detection of genetic conditions through screening technologies such as cell-free DNA. Screening for aneuploidy, copy number variants, and monogenic disorders is clinically available using a sample of maternal blood, but limited data exist on the accuracy of some of these testing options. Additional research is needed to examine the accuracy and utility of screening for increasingly rare conditions. As the breadth of prenatal genetic testing options continues to expand, patients, clinical providers, laboratories, and researchers need to find collaborative means to validate and introduce new testing technologies responsibly. Adequate validation of prenatal tests and effective integration of emerging technologies into prenatal care will become even more important once prenatal treatments for genetic conditions become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Stevens
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth in Houston, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Marshall CR, Chowdhury S, Taft RJ, Lebo MS, Buchan JG, Harrison SM, Rowsey R, Klee EW, Liu P, Worthey EA, Jobanputra V, Dimmock D, Kearney HM, Bick D, Kulkarni S, Taylor SL, Belmont JW, Stavropoulos DJ, Lennon NJ. Best practices for the analytical validation of clinical whole-genome sequencing intended for the diagnosis of germline disease. NPJ Genom Med 2020; 5:47. [PMID: 33110627 PMCID: PMC7585436 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-020-00154-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has shown promise in becoming a first-tier diagnostic test for patients with rare genetic disorders; however, standards addressing the definition and deployment practice of a best-in-class test are lacking. To address these gaps, the Medical Genome Initiative, a consortium of leading healthcare and research organizations in the US and Canada, was formed to expand access to high-quality clinical WGS by publishing best practices. Here, we present consensus recommendations on clinical WGS analytical validation for the diagnosis of individuals with suspected germline disease with a focus on test development, upfront considerations for test design, test validation practices, and metrics to monitor test performance. This work also provides insight into the current state of WGS testing at each member institution, including the utilization of reference and other standards across sites. Importantly, members of this initiative strongly believe that clinical WGS is an appropriate first-tier test for patients with rare genetic disorders, and at minimum is ready to replace chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing. The recommendations presented here should reduce the burden on laboratories introducing WGS into clinical practice, and support safe and effective WGS testing for diagnosis of germline disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R Marshall
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Genome Diagnostics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Shimul Chowdhury
- Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA USA
| | | | - Mathew S Lebo
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Jillian G Buchan
- Stanford Medicine Clinical Genomics Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA USA.,Present Address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Steven M Harrison
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Ross Rowsey
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Eric W Klee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Pengfei Liu
- Baylor Genetics and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Elizabeth A Worthey
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL USA.,Present Address: Center for Genomic Data Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Vaidehi Jobanputra
- Molecular Diagnostics, New York Genome Center, New York, NY USA.,Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC), New York, NY USA
| | - David Dimmock
- Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Hutton M Kearney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - David Bick
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL USA
| | - Shashikant Kulkarni
- Baylor Genetics and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | | | | | - Dimitri J Stavropoulos
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Genome Diagnostics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
柳 小, 李 莹, 杨 丽. [Comparison study of whole exome sequencing and targeted panel sequencing in molecular diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies]. BEIJING DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF PEKING UNIVERSITY. HEALTH SCIENCES 2020; 52:836-844. [PMID: 33047716 PMCID: PMC7653409 DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare whole exome sequencing (WES) and targeted panel sequencing in the clinical molecular diagnosis of the Chinese families affected with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs). METHODS The clinical information of 182 probands affected with IRDs was collected, including their family history and the ophthalmic examination results. Blood samples of all probands and their relatives were collected and genomic DNA was extracted by standard protocols. The first 91 cases were subjected to the WES and the other 91 cases were subjected to a specific hereditary eye disease enrichment panel (HEDEP) designed by us. All likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants in the candidate genes were determined by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analyses were performed in available family members. Copy number variations (CNVs) detected by HEDEP were further validated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). As PRGR ORF15 was difficult to capture by next generation sequencing (NGS), all the samples were subjected to Sanger sequencing for this region. All sequence changes identified by NGS were classified according to the American College of Medical Gene-tics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant interpretation guidelines. In this study, only variants identified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were included, while those variants of uncertain significance, likely benign or benign were not included. RESULTS In 91 cases with WES, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were determined in 30 cases, obtaining a detection rate of 33.00% (30/91); While in 91 cases with HEDEP sequencing, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were determined in 51 cases, achieving the diagnostic rate of 56.04% (51/91), and totally, the diagnostic rate was 44.51%. HEDEP had better sequencing coverage and read depth than WES, therefore HEDEP had higher detection rate. In addition, HEDEP could detect CNVs. In this study, we detected disease-causing variants in 29 distinct IRD-associated genes, USH2A, ABCA4 and RPGR were the three most common disease-causing genes, and the frequency of these genes in Chinese IRDs population was 11.54% (21/182), 6.59% (12/182) and 3.85% (7/182), respectively. We found 43 novel variants and 6 cases carried variants in RPGR ORF15. CONCLUSION NGS in conjunction with Sanger sequencing offers a reliable and effective approach for the genetic diagnosis of IRDs, and after evaluating the pros and cons of the two sequencing methods, we conclude that HEDEP should be used as a first-tier test for IRDs patients, WES can be used as a supplementary molecular diagnostic method due to its merit of detecting novel IRD-associated genes if HEDEP or other methods could not detect disease-causing va-riants in reported genes. In addition, our results enriched the mutational spectra of IRDs genes, and our methods paves the way of genetic counselling, family planning and up-coming gene-based therapies for these families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 小珍 柳
- />北京大学第三医院眼科,北京 100191Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - 莹莹 李
- />北京大学第三医院眼科,北京 100191Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - 丽萍 杨
- />北京大学第三医院眼科,北京 100191Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Boothe M, Morris R, Robin N. Stickler Syndrome: A Review of Clinical Manifestations and the Genetics Evaluation. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10030105. [PMID: 32867104 PMCID: PMC7564399 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10030105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Stickler Syndrome (SS) is a multisystem collagenopathy frequently encountered by ophthalmologists due to the high rate of ocular complications. Affected individuals are at significantly increased risk for retinal detachment and blindness, and early detection and diagnosis are critical in improving visual outcomes for these patients. Systemic findings are also common, with craniofacial, skeletal, and auditory systems often involved. SS is genotypically and phenotypically heterogenous, which can make recognizing and correctly diagnosing individuals difficult. Molecular genetic testing should be considered in all individuals with suspected SS, as diagnosis not only assists in treatment and management of the patient but may also help identify other at-risk family members. Here we review common clinical manifestation of SS and genetic tests frequently ordered as part of the SS evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Boothe
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA;
| | - Robert Morris
- Retina Specialists of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA;
| | - Nathaniel Robin
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Integration of genetic counsellors in genomic testing triage: Outcomes of a genomic consultation service in British Columbia, Canada. Eur J Med Genet 2020; 64:104024. [PMID: 32798762 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical diagnostic genome-wide (exome or genome) sequencing (GWS) in British Columbia requires funding approval by a provincial agency on a case-by-case basis. The CAUSES Clinic was a pediatric translational trio-based GWS study at BC Children's and Women's Hospitals. Referrals to the CAUSES Clinic were made through a Genomic Consultation Service (GCS), a multidisciplinary team led by genetic counsellors that provided advice regarding genomic testing for physicians considering GWS for their patients. Here we review the outcomes of the GCS, focusing on patients not recommended for the CAUSES Study. METHODS Demographic, clinical, and testing data were abstracted from patient charts. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore associations between demographic and clinical variables and two outcomes: the type of recommendation and referring physicians' decisions to follow the recommendation. RESULTS Of 972 GCS referrals, 248 patients were not referred to the CAUSES Study. GWS (vs. a targeted test; e.g. multi-gene panel) was more likely to be recommended to physicians of patients with ID than physicians of patients without ID (OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 1.46 to 6.27; n = 149). In total, 40% of physicians who were recommended to pursue clinical genomic testing submitted an application for funding approval; 71% of applications were approved for funding. Among approved tests, 50% resulted in a diagnosis, including 33% of targeted tests and 82% of GWS tests (χ2 (1) = 5.0, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION The GCS provided an effective model in which physicians can interface with genetic specialists, including genetic counsellors, to facilitate appropriate genomic test selection.
Collapse
|
48
|
Wou K, DeBie I, Carroll J, Brock JA, Douglas Wilson R. Fetal Exome Sequencing on the Horizon. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 41:64-67. [PMID: 30580830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal whole exome sequencing has recently been introduced. It is evolving and although not currently ready for everyday clinical practice, it will likely become part of the diagnostic arsenal available to clinicians caring for couples carrying a pregnancy for which fetal anomalies have been identified. This commentary discusses what it is, its indications, its benefits, and its limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Wou
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC.
| | - Isabelle DeBie
- Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC
| | - June Carroll
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Jo-Ann Brock
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - R Douglas Wilson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wolf SM, Ossorio PN, Berry SA, Greely HT, McGuire AL, Penny MA, Terry SF. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:69-86. [PMID: 32342790 PMCID: PMC7447150 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520916996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Pilar N Ossorio
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Susan A Berry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Henry T Greely
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Michelle A Penny
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| | - Sharon F Terry
- Susan M. Wolf, J.D., is McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. She is also Chair of the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. She is a Principal Investigator on an NIH-supported project on "LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application" (NHGRI/NCI # R01HG008605; Wolf, Clayton, Lawrenz, PIs). Pilar N. Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D., is Professor of Law and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is on the faculties of the Law School and the Department of Medical History and Bioethics at the Medical School. She is Ethics Scholar-in-Residence at the Morgridge Institute for Research, Co-Director of UW's Law and Neuroscience Program, a faculty member in the UW Masters in Biotechnology Studies program, and Program Faculty in the Graduate Program in Population Health. Susan A. Berry, M.D., is Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Minnesota. She is a Professor in the Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. Henry T. Greely, J.D., is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics at Stanford University. He chairs the California Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research and the steering committee of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, and directs the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences and the Stanford Program in Neuroscience and Society. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Baylor College of Medicine. She served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research 2011-15 and is immediate past-President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Michelle A. Penny, Ph.D., is Head of the Translational Genome Sciences Group at Biogen. She is Co-Chair of the National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health and the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Sharon F. Terry, M.A., is President and Chief Executive Officer of Genetic Alliance and co-founder of the Genetic Alliance Registry and Biobank. She has served in a leadership role on organizations including the Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Advisory Panel; Cures Acceleration Network Review Board and Advisory Council, National Center for Accelerating Translation Science, NIH; National Academy Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health; and International Rare Disease Research Consortium Executive Committee. Organizations are listed here for author identification only
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Powis Z, Farwell Hagman KD, Blanco K, Au M, Graham JM, Singh K, Gallant N, Randolph LM, Towne M, Hunter J, Shinde DN, Palmaer E, Schoenfeld B, Tang S. When moments matter: Finding answers with rapid exome sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 8:e1027. [PMID: 31872981 PMCID: PMC7005623 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background When time is of the essence in critical care cases, a fast molecular diagnosis is often necessary to help health care providers quickly determine best next steps for treatments, prognosis, and counseling of their patients. In this paper, we present the diagnostic rates and improved quality of life for patients undergoing clinical rapid exome sequencing. Methods The clinical histories and results of 41 patients undergoing rapid exome sequencing were retrospectively reviewed. Results Clinical rapid exome sequencing identified a definitive diagnosis in 13/41 (31.7%) and other relevant findings in 17 of the patients (41.5%). The average time to verbal report was 7 days; to written report was 11 days. Conclusions Our observations demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of rapid family‐based diagnostic exome sequencing in improving patients care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zöe Powis
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Margaret Au
- Department of Pediatrics, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John M Graham
- Department of Pediatrics, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn Singh
- Memorial Care Health System Genetics Clinic, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Natalie Gallant
- Memorial Care Health System Genetics Clinic, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Randolph
- Division of Medical Genetics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sha Tang
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|