Survey and evidence based review of probiotics used in very low birth weight preterm infants within the United States

Can Enterococcus faecium prevent NEC in preterm infants?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Previous some systematic reviews reported that probiotics may benefit the prevention of NEC in preterm infants. But dissimilar bacterial strains and taxa used in included studies possibly result in bias. There is not a rounded systematic review which has estimated the benefit and safety of Enterococcus faecium to prevent NEC in preterm infants to date before we conducted.

METHODS

This systematic review of randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies analyzing the benefit of Enterococcus faecium to prevent NEC in preterm infants was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Wanfang data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from inception to April 14, 2023. The search terms were "preterm" AND "necrotizing enterocolitis" AND "Enterococcus faecium OR probiotics." Studies reporting NEC involving preterm infants who were given Enterococcus faecium were included in this systematic review. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the stability of results. A funnel plot was generated to identify publication bias. Two authors appraised studies quality and extracted data independently. This work has been reported according with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven studies (N = 1487 participants) were included in this systematic review, and 6 randomized, controlled trials (N = 1237 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Comparing with the control groups, the Enterococcus faecium groups had a significant decline in the incidence of NEC Bell stage II or higher (RR: 0.3138, 95% CI: 0.1983-0.4965; P < .00001; 6 studies, n = 1237) and infection (RR: 0.4818, 95% CI: 0.2950-0.7869; P = .004; 3 studies, n = 710).

CONCLUSIONS

Enterococcus faecium is effective and safe in preventing NEC (Bell stage II or higher) in preterm infants. But all studies included came from China. The dosages and durations of taking Enterococcus faecium were various.

Does probiotic bacteremia in premature infants impact clinically relevant outcomes? A case report and updated review of literature

Prophylactic use of probiotics decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. However, there are ongoing concerns related to the routine use of probiotics including inconsistent literature regarding optimal dose and strain, lack of regulatory standards in production and reports regarding potential side effects. There is limited data regarding the incidence of probiotic bacteremia and its impact on relevant clinical outcomes in the premature population. We report the first case of Bifidobacterium longum bacteremia in our center since the routine introduction of probiotics. The neonate had NEC with perforation on day of life 7, which likely led to translocation of the probiotic strain to the blood stream. The neonate did not have any hemodynamic instability and the repeat blood culture was negative after starting antibiotic therapy. We also conducted a literature review and found 13 other cases of probiotic bacteremia in premature or very low birth weight neonates. Although the incidence of probiotic bacteremia is low, it can impact several clinical outcomes including prolonged exposure to antibiotics, removal of central lines and additional laboratory testing such as lumbar puncture. There has been no mortality attributable to probiotic bacteremia and there is no data regarding long term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Probiotic Use and Safety in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of probiotic administration in infants born preterm over time, as well as the association between probiotic administration and select adverse outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a multicenter cohort study of infants 23-29 weeks of gestational age admitted to 289 neonatal intensive care units from 1997 to 2016. We evaluated the type of probiotics given and prevalence of exposure to probiotics over time and by site. We matched infants exposed to probiotics by several factors to unexposed infants receiving enteral feeds on the same postnatal day. We performed conditional logistic regression to evaluate the association between probiotics exposure and adverse outcomes, including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), bloodstream infections, meningitis, and death.

RESULTS

Of 78 076 infants, 3626 (4.6%) received probiotics. Probiotic use increased over the study period and varied among neonatal intensive care units. We matched 2178 infants exposed to probiotics to 33 807 without exposure. Probiotic administration was associated with a decrease in NEC (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.80) and death (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70), an increase in Candida infection (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.29-3.85), but no increase in bloodstream infection (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70-1.05) or meningitis (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.40-3.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotic use increased over time and was associated with decreased odds of NEC and death. Prospective, randomized-controlled studies of specific probiotic products are needed to further investigate the safety and efficacy of probiotics in preterm infants.