Association between statin treatment and outcome in relation to renal function in survivors of myocardial infarction

Acute Myocardial Infarction and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study on Management and Outcomes from 2010 to 2022

Key Points

Retrospective study of guideline-directed management of myocardial infarction in patients with and without CKD from 2010 to 2022. CKD was associated with lower rate of guideline-directed management and worse prognosis. Uptake of guideline-directed management increased and prognosis improved in both groups during the study period.

Background

CKD is present in >30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and has been associated with lower rates of guideline-directed management and worse prognosis. We investigated the use of guideline-directed management and mortality risk in patients with and without CKD.

Methods

A nationwide cohort study based on health care registers encompassing all patients ≥18 years hospitalized with first-time MI in Denmark from 2010 to 2022 was conducted. CKD was defined as an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Probability of guideline-directed management and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with and without CKD were calculated from adjusted multivariable logistic and Cox regression models with probabilities and risks standardized to the distribution of confounders in the population.

Results

In total, we identified 21,009 patients who met eligibility criteria. The median age was 72 years, and 61% of patients were male; the median eGFR was 82 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 21% of patients had CKD. The 30-day probabilities of coronary angiography and revascularization were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69% to 72%) and 78% (95% CI, 77% to 79%), P < 0.001 and 52% (95% CI, 50% to 54%) and 58% (95% CI, 58% to 59%), P < 0.001, in patients with and without CKD, respectively. Probabilities increased during the study period (P for trend 0.05, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.03, respectively). In patients with and without CKD, the probability of dual antiplatelet therapy was 67% (95% CI, 65% to 68%) and 70% (95% CI, 69% to 71%), P = 0.001, whereas the probability of lipid-lowering treatment was 76% (95% CI, 75% to 78%) and 82% (95% CI, 81% to 83%), P < 0.001, respectively. The associated 1-year mortality was 21% (95% CI, 20% to 22%) and 16.4% (95% CI, 16% to 17%) in patients with and without CKD, respectively. with decreasing mortality rates in both groups during the study period (P for trend 0.03 and 0.01).

Conclusions

Although survival after MI improved for all patients, CKD continued to be associated with lower use of guideline-directed management and higher mortality.

Statins during Anticoagulation for Emergency Life-Threatening Venous Thromboembolism: A Review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the leading cause of morbidity and death worldwide, after cancer and cardiovascular diseases. VTE is defined to include pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Approximately 25% of PE patients experience sudden death as an initial symptom of VTE, and between 10% and 30% of patients die within the first month after diagnosis. Currently, the only drugs approved for the treatment of both acute and chronic VTE are vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, their effectiveness is limited due to their associated risk of bleeding. Ideally, therapy should be able to treat VTE and limit the risk of VTE recurrence without increasing the risk of bleeding. Several studies have shown that the use of statins during anticoagulation for VTE reduces the risk of death and VTE recurrence. However, to date, there are conflicting data on the impact of statins during anticoagulation for VTE. A biological protective function of statins during anticoagulation has also been reported. Statins affect D-dimer levels; tissue factor (TF) gene expression; and VIII, VII, and Von Willebrand clotting factors-the major clotting factors they are able to affect. However, the usefulness of statins for the treatment and prevention of VTE is currently under debate, and they should not be substituted for guideline-recommended VTE prophylaxis or anticoagulation treatment. In this review of the literature, we illustrate the advances on this topic, including data on the role of statins in primary VTE prevention and secondary VTE prevention, related biological mechanisms, the risk of bleeding during their use, and their ability to reduce the risk of death.

Coronary angiography in patients with kidney dysfunction and myocardial injury: A retrospective cohort study on management of myocardial injury in hospitalized patients with kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Although kidney insufficiency has been shown to be associated with increased risk of myocardial injury, benefit of coronary angiography (CAG) and revascularization remains uncertain, with implications on management strategies and outcomes. We aimed to compare rates of CAG and revascularization and subsequent risk of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in hospitalized patients with myocardial injury and kidney dysfunction.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study encompassing hospitalized patients with myocardial injury i.e. elevated troponin I or T and an eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2 identified between 2011 and 2021 in Danish national registers. 30-day odds for CAG were computed across granular eGFR-categories based on multiple logistic regression. Standardized one-year risks of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes including mortality were determined based on hazards obtained in multiple Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 52,798 patients with myocardial injury were identified. CAG was performed in 14.3 % (n = 7549). 30-day odds ratios for CAG were 0.64 [0.60-0.68], 0.38 [0.34-0.42], 0.18 [0.14-0.22], and 0.35 [0.30-0.40] in patients with eGFR 31-45 ml/min/1.73 m2, eGFR 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m2 for eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2 and chronic dialysis, respectively (eGFR 46-60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as reference). Median follow-up was 4.1 years. One-year mortality risk differences associated with CAG and revascularization (no CAG as reference) were -7.8 [-7.0; -8.7] and -9.1 [-8.4; -9.9] for eGFR 46-60 ml/min/1.73 m2; -7.0 [-5.7;-8-3] and -8.0 [-6.6; -9.5] for eGFR 31-45 ml/min/1.73 m2; -5.4 [-3.0; -7.2] and -5.2 [-2.2; -8.3] for eGFR 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m2; -8.8 [-3.1; -13.7] and -5.4 [3.1; -13.4] for eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2; and -4.9 [-0.1; -9.7] and -4.2 [1.5; -9.2] for chronic dialysis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Probability of CAG following myocardial injury declined with progressive kidney dysfunction. Overall, CAG was associated with lower mortality irrespective of kidney function and subsequent revascularization.

Statin use and 30-day mortality in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Statins possess antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties. The association between statin use and short-term outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unknown.

METHODS

We used the data from the Registro Informatizado de Pacientes con Enfermedad TromboEmbólica registry to compare the 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with acute PE according to the use of statins. Secondary outcome was fatal PE. We used cancer-related mortality as a falsification endpoint.

RESULTS

From January 2009 to April 2021, 31 169 patients with PE were recruited. Of these, 5520 (18%) were using statins at baseline: low intensity: 829, moderate: 3636, high intensity: 1055. Statin users were older and had a higher frequency of diabetes, hypertension, or atherosclerotic disease than non-users (P <0.001 for all comparisons). During the first 30 days, 1475 patients died (fatal PE, 255). On multivariable analysis, statin users had a lower risk of all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.76) and fatal PE (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.28-0.62) than non-users. The risk for death was lower in patients using either low- (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.34-0.77), moderate- (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57-0.81), or high-intensity statins (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51-0.92). Results did not change in mixed effects logistic regression models with hospitals as a random effect. Statins were not associated with a significant chance in cancer mortality (falsification endpoint).

CONCLUSIONS

PE patients using statins at baseline had a significantly lower risk of dying within the first 30 days than non-users. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these data.

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with kidney impairment

The benefit and utility of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with kidney impairment is unclear. Here, we describe implementation of hs-cTnI testing on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of myocardial infarction in patients with and without kidney impairment. Consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome enrolled in a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial were included in this pre-specified secondary analysis. Kidney impairment was defined as an eGFR under 60mL/min/1.73m2. The index diagnosis and primary outcome of type 1 and type 4b myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at one year were compared in patients with and without kidney impairment following implementation of hs-cTnI assay with 99th centile sex-specific diagnostic thresholds. Serum creatinine concentrations were available in 46,927 patients (mean age 61 years; 47% women), of whom 9,080 (19%) had kidney impairment. hs-cTnIs were over 99th centile in 46% and 16% of patients with and without kidney impairment. Implementation increased the diagnosis of type 1 infarction from 12.4% to 17.8%, and from 7.5% to 9.4% in patients with and without kidney impairment (both significant). Patients with kidney impairment and type 1 myocardial infarction were less likely to undergo coronary revascularization (26% versus 53%) or receive dual anti-platelets (40% versus 68%) than those without kidney impairment, and this did not change post-implementation. In patients with hs-cTnI above the 99th centile, the primary outcome occurred twice as often in those with kidney impairment compared to those without (24% versus 12%, hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.78). Thus, hs-cTnI testing increased the identification of myocardial injury and infarction but failed to address disparities in management and outcomes between those with and without kidney impairment.

Different Types of Statins and All-Cause Mortality during Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism: Validation Study from RIETE Registry

Introduction  We previously reported that during the course of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients using statins were at a lower risk to die than nonusers.

Methods  We used the R egistro I nformatizado E nfermedad T rombo E mbólica (RIETE) registry to validate our previous findings in a subsequent cohort of patients and to compare the risk of death according to the use of different types of statins.

Results  From January 2018 to December 2019, 19,557 patients with VTE were recruited in RIETE. Of them, 4,065 (21%) were using statins (simvastatin, 1,406; atorvastatin, 1,328; rosuvastatin, 246; and others, 1,085). During anticoagulation (192 vs.182 days, for statin and no statin users respectively), 500 patients developed a VTE recurrence, 519 suffered major bleeding, and 1,632 died (fatal pulmonary embolism [PE], 88 and fatal bleeding, 78). On multivariable analysis, statin users were at a lower risk to die (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59–0.79) than nonusers. When separately analyzing the drugs, on multivariable analysis, patients using simvastatin (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52–0.80), atorvastatin (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58–0.89), or other statins (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52–0.87) were at a lower risk to die than nonusers. For those using rosuvastatin, difference was not statistically significant (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50–1.19), maybe due to the sample size.

Conclusion  Our data validate previous findings and confirm that VTE patients using statins at baseline are at a lower risk to die than nonusers. No statistically differences were found according to type of statins.

Temporal Trends in Utilization of Cardiac Therapies and Outcomes for Myocardial Infarction by Degree of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report From the NCDR Chest Pain-MI Registry

Background

We sought to determine temporal trends in use of evidence‐based therapies and clinical outcomes among myocardial infarction (MI) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods and Results

MI patients from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) Chest Pain–MI Registry between January 2007 and December 2015 were categorized into 3 groups by degree of CKD (end‐stage renal disease on dialysis, CKD [glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m²] not requiring dialysis, and no CKD [glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m²]). Logistic regression modeling was used to determine the association between calendar years (2014–2015 versus 2007–2008) and each outcome by degree of CKD. Among 325 396 patients with ST‐segment–elevation MI, 1.0% had end‐stage renal disease requiring dialysis, and 26.1% had CKD not requiring dialysis. Use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention increased over time regardless of the presence or degree of CKD (P=0.40 for interaction). In‐hospital mortality was temporally higher among patients with preserved renal function (odds ratio: 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–1.39; P<0.001) but not among patients with CKD (P=0.035 for interaction). Among 506 876 non–ST‐segment–elevation MI patients, 3.4% had end‐stage renal disease requiring dialysis, and 34.4% had CKD not requiring dialysis. P2Y₁₂ inhibitor use within 24 hours increased over time only among dialysis patients (P for interaction <0.001). Use of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention also increased, with the greatest increase among dialysis patients (P for interaction <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). In‐hospital mortality was lower, regardless of the presence or degree of CKD (P=0.64 for interaction).

Conclusions

Uptake of evidence‐based medical and invasive therapies has increased over the past decade among MI patients with CKD, particularly dialysis patients, with improvement of in‐hospital mortality observed among patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation MI, but not ST‐segment–elevation MI, and CKD.

See Editorial by Hira

Statin and all-cause mortality in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism. Data from the RIETE registry

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes during the course of anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) using statins remain controversial.

METHODS

We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the risk for VTE recurrences, major bleeding or death during anticoagulation, according to the use of statins at baseline. We used propensity score-matching (PSM) to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

From February 2009 to January 2018, 32,062 VTE patients were included. Of these, 7,085 (22%) were using statins. Statin users were 10 years older (73±11 vs. 63±19 years, respectively) and more likely to have comorbidities or to be using antiplatelets or corticosteroids at baseline than non-users. During the course of anticoagulation (median, 177 days), 694 patients developed VTE recurrences, 848 bled and 3,169 died (fatal pulmonary embolism 176, fatal bleeding 121). Statin users had a similar rate of VTE recurrences (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.82-1.17), a higher rate of major bleeding (HR: 1.29; 95%CI: 1.11-1.50) and a similar mortality rate (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.93-1.10) than non-users. On PSM analysis, statin users had a significantly lower risk for death (HR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.48-0.79) and a similar risk for VTE recurrences (HR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.61-1.57) or major bleeding (HR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.59-1.21) than non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

During anticoagulation for VTE, patients using statins at baseline had a lower risk to die than non-users.

Statin therapy among chronic kidney disease patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The beneficial effect of statin therapy has been well established for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, it remains under-used among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to investigate the impact of statin therapy across a wide spectrum of CKD patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

We included all patients with ACS enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Survey (ACSIS) between the years 2006 and 2016, and allocated them to 3 groups according to their renal function based on an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculation on admission (MDRD formula): eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m² (n = 525, 6%), eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m² (n = 1919, 21%), and eGFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m² (n = 6501, 73%). Primary outcome included in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and the independent prognostic effect of statins among CKD patients with ACS, by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

All 8945 consecutive ACS patients were included in our analysis. On hospital discharge, statin prescriptions were negatively associated with eGFR ]eGFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m² -95%, eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m² -90%, eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m² -78% (p < 0.001 for trend). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated both short and long-term higher mortality rates in those prescribed compared with those not prescribed statins (p < 0.001), regardless of renal function. Cox regression analysis revealed the protective effect of discharge statins (HR-0.25, 95% C.I 0.2-0.3, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the beneficial effect of statins was maintained among CKD patients presenting with ACS. Therefore, these patients should be treated with statins regardless of their eGFR.

Statin Use during Hospitalization and Short-Term Mortality in Acute Ischaemic Stroke with Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVES

Statin use during hospitalization improves prognosis in patients with ischaemic stroke. However, it remains uncertain whether acute ischaemic stroke patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) benefit from statin therapy. We investigated the effect of statin use during hospitalization in reducing short-term mortality of patients with ischaemic stroke and CKD.

METHODS

Data of first-ever ischaemic stroke patients without a history of pre-stroke statin treatment was derived from the China National Stroke Registry. Patients were stratified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): normal renal function (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), mild CKD (eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and moderate CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between statin use during hospitalization and all-cause mortality with different renal functions at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 5,951 patients included, 2,595 (43.6%) patients were on statin use during hospitalization after stroke (45.7% in patients with normal renal function, 42.0% in patients with mild CKD, and 39.0% in patients with moderate CKD). Compared with the non-statin group, statin use during hospitalization was associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with normal renal function (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.97, p = 0.04), mild CKD (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.91, p = 0.02) and moderate CKD (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.75, p = 0.004) at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use during hospitalization was associated with decreased 3-month mortality of ischaemic stroke patients with mild and moderate CKD. However, the conclusion should be confirmed in further studies with larger population, especially with moderate CKD.

The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients with chronic kidney disease

Coronary heart disease is highly prevalent in patients with CKD, and survival after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is worse compared with the general population. Many trials that define guidelines for cardiovascular disease excluded patients with kidney disease, leaving a gap between the evidence base and clinical reality. The underlying pathophysiology of vascular disease appears to be different in the setting of CKD. Patients with CKD are more likely to present with myocardial infarction and less likely to be diagnosed with ACS on admission compared with the general population. Patients with CKD appear to benefit with angiography and revascularization compared with medical management alone. However, the increased risk of in-hospital bleeding and risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury are 2 factors that can limit overall benefit for some. Thus, judicious application of available therapies for the management of ACS is warranted to extend survival and reduce hospitalizations in this high-risk population. In this review, we highlight the clinical challenges and potential solutions for managing ACS in patients with CKD.

Statins of high versus low cholesterol-lowering efficacy and the development of severe renal failure

BACKGROUND

The objective of this nationwide retrospective cohort study was to examine the renal outcomes of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) initiators.

METHODS

The patients who started to take statins with high cholesterol-lowering efficacy (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) and low efficacy (lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin) between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2008 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database. The outcome of interest was severe renal failure, defined as the composite endpoint of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. A proportional hazard regression model was applied to estimate the incidence ratio between the two groups, adjusted for the propensity scores based upon baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among of the 26,007 and 42,249 statin initiators, the crude incidence rate for developing severe renal failure was 0.65 and 0.46 per 100 person-years for the high-efficacy and low-efficacy groups, respectively. Despite that these two groups had comparable risk for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.92–1.21), there was a 13% increased hazard for developing severe renal failure in the rosuvastatin and atorvastatin initiators (hazard ratio: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.02–1.26). The increased risk associated with these two statins was consistent across different risk groups (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and ischemic heart disease).

CONCLUSIONS

Statins with high cholesterol-lowering efficacy might increase the risk for developing severe renal failure. An alternative explanation is that the renal risk cannot be ameliorated as much as cardiovascular risk. Further follow-up studies or meta-analyses are needed to solve the controversy.

Effect of statins on cardiovascular events in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Statins are commonly used to lower total cholesterol levels in the general population to prevent cardiovascular events. However, the effects of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease remain unclear. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to assess the effects of statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, proceedings of major meetings, and reference lists of articles for relevant literature. Only randomized clinical trials were included. Outcomes analysed included cardiovascular disease, total mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, and possible drug-related adverse events. Subgroup analyses were also performed based on the population characteristics and clinical indexes.

RESULTS

Twelve trials met our inclusion criteria. Overall, statin therapy resulted in a 24% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease (RR = 0.76,95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72- 0.80), a 21% reduction in the risk of total mortality (RR = 0.79,95% CI, 0.72-0.86), a 34% reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR = 0.66,95% CI, 0.52-0.83), a 30% reduction in the risk of stroke (RR = 0.70,95% CI, 0.57-0.85), and a 17% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.83,95% CI, 0.73- 0.93). No statistically significant drug-related adverse events were noted. Subgroup analysis indicated that some important factors such as baseline creatinine level ≥1.5 mg/dL, baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and cardiovascular disease history could affect cardiovascular outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Statin therapy had a clear effect on cardiovascular disease, total mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction in patients with mild to moderate renal disease. Subgroup analysis indicated that baseline GFR, baseline creatinine level, and a history of cardiovascular disease might play an important role in the cardiovascular outcomes.

Statin therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events Registry)

Secondary prevention trials have demonstrated the efficacy of statins in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are few data describing the clinical value of statins in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing PCI. Of 10,148 patients who entered into Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events, a multicenter registry of unselected patients undergoing PCI from July 2004 to December 2007, we studied 2,306 patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 ml/min based on the Modified Diet in Renal Disease calculation). Patients were stratified into those receiving statins at discharge (n = 1,833, 79%) or not (n = 473, 21%). Patients in the statin group had a greater prevalence of hypertension, recent myocardial infarction (MI), and use of β blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Outcomes were assessed from discharge through 1-year follow-up. One-year all-cause mortality was 5.7% in statin group versus 8.7% in the no statin group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.88). The composite of death, MI, and repeat revascularization was lower in statin group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.99). In conclusion, among patients with CKD undergoing PCI, the prescription of statins at hospital discharge was associated with a significant improvement in subsequent outcomes including mortality and composite end point of death, MI, and repeat revascularization.

The lipid story in chronic kidney disease: a long story with a happy end?

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality increase with the severity of kidney disease, reaching 30 times higher mortality rates in dialysis patients compared with the general population. Although dyslipidemia is a well-established CV risk factor in the general population, the relationship between lipid disorders and CV risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less clear. Despite the clear evidence that statins reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events and death from cardiac causes in individuals without CKD, the use of statins in patients with kidney disease is significantly less frequent. For a long time, one of the explanations was the lack of a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed specifically to CKD patients. After recent publication of the data from Study of Heart and Renal Protection trial, given the safety and potential efficacy of statins, this lipid-lowering treatment should be administered more frequently to individuals with CKD stage 1-4, as well as those undergoing dialysis.

Decline in 20-year mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease: evolution from the prethrombolysis to the percutaneous coronary intervention era

Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here we measured temporal trends in treatment and mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) depending on kidney function at presentation in 12,087 patients admitted for MI to a coronary care unit from 1985 to 2008. The patients were categorized into those with normal kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate over 90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), and those with CKD as defined by Kidney Foundation practice guidelines, with 8632 patients (71%) at CKD stages 2-5. Use of evidence-based care increased over time in all CKD stages. Mortality rates fell over the entire time period. When comparing data from 2000-2008 to that from 1985-1990, adjusted 30-day mortality fell both in patients with CKD stages 4-5 (adjusted odds 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.60) and in those without kidney impairment (adjusted odds 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.42). This mortality decrease was sustained during long-term follow-up. There was no significant interaction between kidney function and decade of admission. Overall, median survival was over 20, 15, 8, and 1.8 years for patients with normal kidney function, stage 2, stage 3, and stage 4-5 CKD, respectively. Thus, during the past 25 years, treatment of patients with a MI improved substantially with a concomitant decline in mortality. Although our findings were similar for all stages of kidney function, the prognosis remains poor for patients with stage 4-5 CKD.

Statins and kidney disease: is the study of heart and renal protection at the cutting edge of evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dyslipidaemias are noted in all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Currently most evidence for their treatment comes from secondary retrospective analyses of patient subgroups with CKD recruited into clinical trials powered of hypertensive and dyslipideamic cohorts powered for cardiovascular endpoints.These analyses suggest a number of different beneficial effects of statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) on renal, cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. However, there is disagreement on the impact of interventions at different CKD stages, and on treatment targets.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) trial published in June 2011 was the first trial specifically powered to investigate atherosclerotic outcomes in CKD patients. It found a 17% overall reduction in major adverse cardiac events in the statin-treated group compared with placebo, yet no effect on any renal outcomes of proteinuria and progressive decline of glomerular filtration rate. Furthermore, the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidencebased care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) investigators provided further important observational data on the beneficial effect of statins in CKD stages I-IV.

SUMMARY

The evidence that statins have a cardiovascular and mortality benefit in CKD stages I-IV has been reinforced by SHARP, which also definitively shows that there are no special safety concerns for their administration in CKD. However, the utility of the use of statins in patients on dialysis is far from clear, at least in our opinion. The effect of statins on renal outcomes is unconvincing and the evidence does not presently support their use for these indications alone.