A comparative effectiveness research study of the change in blood pressure during hemodialysis treatment and survival

The Effect of Low Dialysate Sodium Concentration on Ambulatory Aortic Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Intradialytic Hypertension: A Randomized Crossover Study

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in dialysis patients and may contribute to the development of the phenomenon, as patients with IDH exhibit higher ambulatory aortic blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness parameters than patients without IDH.  Methods: This analysis examined the effect of low (137mEq/L) compared to standard (140mEq/L) dialysate sodium concentration on 48-hour aortic BP and arterial stiffness parameters in IDH patients. In this prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized, single-blind, crossover study, 29 IDH patients underwent four hemodialysis sessions with low followed by four sessions with standard dialysate sodium or vice-versa. Mean 48-hour, pre-/post-dialysis and intradialytic aortic systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP), and arterial stiffness indices were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean 48-hour aortic SBP/DBP were significantly lower with low versus standard dialysate sodium (124.1±16.4/83.0±14.1mmHg vs 128.5±12.9/85.8±14.1mmHg, p=0.013/p=0.006 respectively). Low dialysate sodium also significantly reduced pre-dialysis aortic SBP (126.4±17.4 vs 135.6±18.6mmHg, p=0.044) and post-dialysis aortic SBP (137.0±20.0 vs 147.9±18.1mmHg, p=0.01). All wave reflection indices were numerically lower with low dialysate sodium; among them, heart rate-adjusted augmentation index (AIx(75)) was significantly lower during the 48-hour (26.3±6.7 vs 27.7±5.8%, p=0.03), 44-hour, day-time and intradialytic periods. Low dialysate sodium resulted in decreased 48-hour pulse wave velocity (PWV) (9.9±2.5 vs 10.1±2.6m/s, p=0.008); similar differences for PWV were observed during all examined time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, ambulatory 48-hour aortic BP and arterial stiffness parameters were significantly lower using low compared to standard dialysate sodium in IDH patients. These findings further support the use of low dialysate sodium for BP management in this population.

Intradialytic Hypertension in Maintenance Hemodialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current evidence regarding epidemiology, clinical pathophysiology, and latest therapeutic approaches for the management of intradialytic hypertension (IDH).

RECENT FINDINGS

IDH is a rather common complication of dialysis, affecting 10-15% of the patient population and significantly increasing the cardiovascular risk. Its pathophysiology involves multiple mechanisms, including volume and sodium overload, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) overactivity, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness. IDH management requires a combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions. The first mainly focus on volume control through dry weight optimization and modification of dialysate sodium, as studies show that strict volume control or low dialysate sodium can significantly reduce intradialytic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP). Pharmacological interventions have also been examined in research studies. Beta-blockers, particularly those with vasodilatory properties, can effectively target mechanisms such as SNS overactivity and endothelial dysfunction, and have shown some promising results reducing both intradialytic and ambulatory BP. Other drugs classes have also been explored as potential therapeutic options for IDH management, though further research is needed to clarify the efficacy of these interventions. A tailored approach addressing both the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and individualized patient is warranted for improving BP control and cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk population.

Dialysate sodium and short-term blood pressure variability in patients with intradialytic hypertension: a randomized crossover study

Increased blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with high cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis. Patients with intradialytic hypertension (IDH) also exhibit an increased cardiovascular risk compared to hemodialysis patients without this condition. The impact of non-pharmacological BP-lowering interventions on BPV in this population remains unknown. This analysis evaluated the effect of low (137mEq/L) compared to standard (140mEq/L) dialysate sodium concentration on short-term BPV in patients with IDH. In a randomized cross-over manner, 29 IDH patients underwent 4 hemodialysis sessions with low (137mEq/L) followed by 4 sessions with standard (140mEq/L) dialysate sodium or vice versa. 48 h ambulatory BP measurement was performed from the start of the 4th session on each dialysate sodium. BPV indices during the 48 h, 24 h, day-time and night-time periods were calculated. Mean 48 h BP was 5.3/2.6 mmHg lower with low compared to standard dialysate sodium concentration, (p = 0.005/p = 0.007 respectively). All 48 h systolic BPV indices examined showed non-significant differences between low and standard dialysate sodium (SBP-SD: 16.99 ± 5.39 vs. 16.98 ± 4.33 mmHg, p = 0.982; SBP-wSD: 15.93 ± 5.02 vs. 16.12 ± 4.16 mmHg, p = 0.769; SBP-ARV: 11.99 ± 3.67 vs. 11.45 ± 3.35 mmHg, p = 0.392; SBP-CV: 12.36 ± 3.65 vs. 11.92 ± 3.18%, p = 0.302, with low vs. standard dialysate sodium, respectively). Diastolic BPV indices were numerically, but not statistically, lower with low dialysate sodium. Overall, significant differences were observed in some comparisons with a trend for lower BPV during day-time 2 and higher BVP during night-time 2 with low dialysate sodium. In conclusion, low dialysate sodium concentration does not affect BPV levels in patients with IDH. Future research should explore alternative interventions to reduce BP and BPV in this high-risk population.

Low dialysate sodium and 48-h ambulatory blood pressure in patients with intradialytic hypertension: a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events and mortality. Patients with IDH exhibit higher 48-h blood pressure (BP) levels than patients without this condition. Volume and sodium excess are considered a major factor contributing in the development of this phenomenon. This study evaluated the effect of low (137 mEq/L) compared with standard (140 mEq/L) dialysate sodium concentration on 48-h BP in patients with IDH.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, crossover study, 29 patients with IDH underwent four hemodialysis sessions with low (137 mEq/L) followed by four sessions with standard (140 mEq/L) dialysate sodium, or vice versa. Mean 48-h BP, pre-/post-dialysis and intradialytic BP, pre-dialysis weight, interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and lung ultrasound B-lines were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean 48-h systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) were significantly lower with low compared with standard dialysate sodium concentration (137.6 ± 17.0/81.4 ± 13.7 mmHg with low vs 142.9 ± 14.5/84.0 ± 13.9 mmHg with standard dialysate sodium, P = .005/P = .007, respectively); SBP/DBP levels were also significantly lower during the 44-h and different 24-h periods. Low dialysate sodium significantly reduced post-dialysis (SBP/DBP: 150.3 ± 22.3/91.2 ± 15.1 mmHg with low vs 166.6 ± 17.3/94.5 ± 14.9 mmHg with standard dialysate sodium, P < .001/P = .134, respectively) and intradialytic (141.4 ± 18.0/85.0 ± 13.4 mmHg with low vs 147.5 ± 13.6/88.1 ± 12.5 mmHg with standard dialysate sodium, P = .034/P = .013, respectively) BP compared with standard dialysate sodium. Pre-dialysis weight, IDWG and pre-dialysis B lines were also significantly decreased with low dialysate sodium.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dialysate sodium concentration significantly reduced 48-h ambulatory BP compared with standard dialysate sodium in patients with IDH. These findings support low dialysate sodium as a major non-pharmacologic approach for BP management in patients with IDH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov study number NCT05430438.

Intradialysis hypertension, a diagnosis to be discovered

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is a poorly understood phenomenon with no consensus on its definition, etiology, or related factors, and there is limited evidence on its consequences.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of IDH according to different definitions in hemodialysis (HD) units, with different clinical practices and assessment of possible events after 18 months have passed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 2 HD units, including all prevalent patients from March 2021 to September 2022. We established 3 definitions of IDH: IDH was considered present if the criterion was met in more than 50% of the 6 consecutive sessions (2 weeks) of follow-up. Personal history, medications, dialysis characteristics, and pre- and post-HD biochemical data were collected. Residual renal function (RRF) was considered as urine output >250 ml/24 h. At 18 months, the possible events of the group were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 169 patients (68% men) with a mean age of 67.9 (14.2) years and a median HD duration of 34.5 (IQR 17.5-67.5) months. Of these, 94 come from one unit and 75 from the other. The prevalence of IDH was 8.3% according to Def 1, 27.2% according to Def 2, and 29.6% according to Def 3. Def 2 showed an association with a history of previous hypertension, use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), and furosemide, as well as with patients with RRF. Def 3 showed an association only with coronary artery disease. There was an association with different prescriptions of dialysis fluids. Catecholaminergic hormones and aldosterone did not increase in patients with hypertension during the HD session. They did not present a higher incidence of cardiovascular events or mortality at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

IDH has different prevalence rates depending on the definition used and the studied center. The future poses an important challenge: to determine which definition correlates with higher morbidity and mortality and the role of differences found in different HD units.

Beta-blocker efficacy for intra- and interdialytic hypertension patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Intradialytic hypertension affects 5-15% of hemodialysis patients, yet relevant studies are relatively scarce. It is also associated with higher interdialytic blood pressure. Beta-blockers can be preferred as antihypertensive drugs due to their superior blood pressure control, decreased risk of cardiovascular events, improved endothelial cell function, and decreased noradrenaline levels. Through this study, beta-blocker antihypertensive effects in intra- and interdialytic hypertension were analyzed.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. We registered our PROSPERO protocol (Registration ID: CRD42023446184) and included relevant full-text clinical trials or RCTs from 2008 to 2023 with predetermined keywords and criteria from multiple databases including PUBMED, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, and citation searching. Seven eligible articles were included in this review study.

RESULTS

Four studies with 82 participants for intradialytic hypertension evaluation were included. Meta-analysis showed a decrease in SBP in intradialytic hypertensive patients after beta-blocker intervention, with a significant estimated mean difference of - 15.19 mmHg (P < 0.00001; 95% CI - 19.47 to - 10.91). Supporting previous data, SBP remains constant between pre- and post-dialysis with beta-blocker therapy, with an insignificant estimated mean difference of - 2.72 mmHg (P = 0.29; 95% CI - 7.80 to 2.36). Whereas five studies with 142 participants were included for interdialytic hypertension evaluation. Meta-analysis shows a significant decrease in SBP before to after therapy, with an estimated mean difference of - 10.92 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI - 16.33 to - 5.51).

CONCLUSION

Beta-blocker treatment resulted in significant reductions in post-hemodialysis systolic blood pressure among intra- and interdialytic hypertensive patients.

The prevalence and risk of mortality associated with intradialytic hypertension among patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) is a common but less frequently recognised complication of haemodialysis. However, it is associated with increased overall mortality in patients on haemodialysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of IDHTN and associated mortality risk in the global haemodialysis population.

METHOD

A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was undertaken to identify articles with relevant data published between 1990 and 2023. The pooled prevalence of IDHTN in the global haemodialysis population was determined using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. The pooled hazards ratio for mortality in patients with IDHTN was also computed from the studies that reported mortality among haemodialysis patients with IDHTN. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023388278).

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles from 17 countries were included, with a pooled population of 127,080 hemodialysis patients (median age 55.1 years, 38.2% females). Most studies had medium methodological quality (53.1%, n = 17). The overall pooled prevalence of IDHTN was 26.6% [(95% CI 20.2-33.4%), n = 27 studies, I2 = 99.3%, p<0.001 for heterogeneity], with significant differences depending on the definition used. The pooled proportion of haemodialysis sessions with IDHTN was 19.9% [(95% 12.5-28.6%, n = 8 studies, I2 = 99.3%, p<0.001 for heterogeneity)] with significant differences across the different definition criteria. The p-value for the Begg test was 0.85. The median pre-dialysis blood pressure was not significantly associated with IDHTN. The pooled hazard ratio for mortality was 1.37 (95% CI 1.09-1.65), n = 5 studies, I2 = 13.7%, and p-value for heterogeneity = 0.33.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of IDHTN is high and varies widely according to the definition used. A consensus definition of IDHTN is needed to promote uniformity in research and management. The increased mortality risk forecasted by IDHTN highlights the need for optimal blood pressure control in patients on hemodialysis.

Association of Calcium Channel Blocker Use With Intradialytic Hypotension in Maintenance Hemodialysis

Introduction

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are common antihypertensive agents among patients receiving hemodialysis (HD). Despite this, the association of CCBs with intradialytic hypotension (IDH), an important adverse outcome that is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, remains largely unexplored.

Methods

Using kinetic modeling sessions data from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study, random effects regression models were fit to assess the association of CCB use versus nonuse with IDH (defined as systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 90 mm Hg if pre-HD SBP < 160 mm Hg or < 100 mm Hg if pre-HD SBP ≥160 mm Hg). Models were adjusted for age, biological sex (distinguishing between males and females), race, randomized Kt/V and flux assignments, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, blood urea nitrogen, ultrafiltration rate, access type, pre-HD SBP, and other antihypertensives.

Results

Data were available for 1838 patients and 64,538 sessions. At baseline, 49% of patients were prescribed CCBs. The overall frequency of IDH was 14% with a mean decline from pre- to nadir-SBP of 33 ± 15 mm Hg. CCB use was associated with lower adjusted risk of IDH, compared with no use (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.89). The association was most pronounced for those in the pre-HD SBP lowest quartile (IRR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.85); compared with the highest quartile (IRR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97; P-interaction < 0.001).

Conclusion

Among patients receiving HD, CCB use was associated with a lower risk of developing IDH, independent of pre-HD SBP and other antihypertensives use. Mechanistic studies are needed to better understand the effects of CCB and other antihypertensives on peridialytic blood pressure (BP) parameters among patients receiving HD.

Hypertensive Emergency During Dialysis: A Paradoxical Physiologic Response

Most end-stage renal disease patients experience a reduction in blood pressure during their hemodialysis session compared to predialysis. Surprisingly, a small subset of patients will experience an unusual physiological response to dialysis that results in a paradoxical increase in blood pressure. We discuss a case that involved an exaggerated elevation in blood pressure, ultimately requiring immediate cessation of dialysis and admission to the intensive care unit for intravenous treatment of a hypertensive emergency. This case serves as a framework to introduce the infrequently discussed concept of intradialytic hypertension. The underlying pathogenesis is poorly understood with multiple theoretical etiologies including activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, imbalances in circulating levels of endothelium-derived mediators, clearance of antihypertensive medications, increased cardiac output, and changes in arterial thickness. It is important to be cognizant of this phenomenon as emerging evidence suggests that patients with any elevation in blood pressure during hemodialysis have increased rates of both short-term and long-term mortality.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis reduced the frequency of intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication during hemodialysis that increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Aortic stenosis (AS) is a cause of IDH. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established treatment for patients with severe AS. However, whether TAVR reduce the frequency of IDH has not been investigated. This study aims to verify the efficacy of TAVR for reduction of the frequency of IDH. Consecutive hemodialysis patients who underwent TAVR at Sendai Kosei Hospital from February 2021 to November 2021 with available records 1 month before and 3 months after TAVR were included in the study. IDH was defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure by 20 mmHg or a decrease in the mean blood pressure by 10 mmHg associated with hypotensive symptoms or requiring intervention. Patients with ≥ 3 episodes of IDH in ten hemodialysis sessions comprised the IDH group. Overall, 18/41 (43.9%) patients were classified into the IDH group. In ten hemodialysis sessions, IDH events were observed 2.1, 4.3, and 0.4 times in the overall cohort, IDH group, and non-IDH group, respectively. After TAVR, the incidence of IDH decreased from 43.2 to 10.3% (p < 0.0001) and IDH improved significantly in 15 patients in the IDH group. The result suggested that severe AS was the major cause of IDH in this cohort, and TAVR may be an effective treatment option for reduction of the frequency of IDH in patients with severe AS.

The Association Among Post-hemodialysis Blood Pressure, Nocturnal Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Background

Most hemodialysis (HD) patients suffer from hypertension and have a heightened cardiovascular risk. While blood pressure (BP) control is essential to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, overly stringent control can lead to intradialytic hypotension (IDH). This study aimed to examine BP variations during and after HD to determine whether these variations correlate with IDH risk.

Methods

BP measurements during dialysis were taken from 28 ESKD patients, and ambulatory BP monitoring was applied post-dialysis. Laboratory parameters and risk factors, including diabetes, coronary disease, and LV mass index, were compared between IDH and non-IDH groups using an independent t-test.

Results

Of the 28 patients with an average age of 57.4 years, 16 (57.1%) had diabetes, 5 (17.9%) had coronary artery disease, and 1 (3.6%) had cerebrovascular disease. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) during and post-HD was 142.26 mmHg and 156.05 mmHg, respectively (p=0.0003). Similarly, the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also demonstrated a significant increase, from 74.59 mmHg during HD to 86.82 mmHg post-HD (p<0.0001). Patients with IDH exhibited a more substantial SBP difference (delta SBP, 36.38 vs. 15.07 mmHg, p=0.0033; age-adjusted OR=1.58, p=0.0168) and a lower post-dialysis BUN level (12.75 vs. 18.77 mg/dL, p=0.0015; age-adjusted OR=0.76, p=0.0242). No significant variations were observed in daytime and nocturnal BP between the IDH and non-IDH groups.

Conclusion

Hemodialysis patients exhibited a marked increase in post-dialysis BP and lacked a nocturnal BP dip, suggesting augmented cardiovascular risks. This highlights the importance of more stringent BP control after hemodialysis.

Association of Intradialytic Hypertension with Future Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: Effects of Ambulatory Blood Pressure

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Patients with IDHTN have higher 44-h blood pressure (BP) than patients without this condition. Whether the excess risk in these patients is due to the BP rise during dialysis per se or on elevated 44-h BP or other comorbid conditions is uncertain. This study evaluated the association of IDHTN with cardiovascular events and mortality and the influence of ambulatory BP and other cardiovascular risk factors on these associations.

METHODS

242 hemodialysis patients with valid 48-h ABPM (Mobil-O-Graph-NG) were followed for a median of 45.7 months. IDHTN was defined as: systolic BP (SBP) rise ≥10 mm Hg from pre- to post-dialysis and post-dialysis SBP ≥150 mm Hg. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, heart failure hospitalization, coronary or peripheral revascularization.

RESULTS

Cumulative freedom from both the primary and secondary endpoint was significantly lower for IDHTN patients (logrank-p = 0.048 and 0.022, respectively), corresponding to higher risks for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.566; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.001, 2.450]) and the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR = 1.675; 95% CI [1.071, 2.620]) in these individuals. However, the observed associations lost statistical significance after adjustment for 44-h SBP (HR = 1.529; 95% CI [0.952, 2.457] and HR = 1.388; 95% CI [0.866, 2.225], respectively). In the final model after additional adjustment for 44-h SBP, interdialytic weight gain, age, history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, and 44-h pulse wave velocity, the association of IDHTN with the outcomes was also not significant and the respective HRs were 1.377 (95% CI [0.836, 2.268]) and 1.451 (95% CI [0.891, 2.364]).

CONCLUSIONS

IDHTN patients had higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes but this risk is at least partly confounded by the elevated BP levels during the interdialytic period.

Home Pulse Pressure Predicts Death and Cardiovascular Events in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Increased arterial hypertension represents a prevalent condition in peritoneal dialysis patients that is often related to volume expansion. Pulse pressure is a robust predictor of mortality in dialysis patients, but its association with mortality is unknown in peritoneal patients. We investigated the relationship between home pulse pressure and survival in 140 PD patients. During a mean follow-up of 35 months, 62 patients died, and 66 experienced the combined event death/CV events. In a crude COX regression analysis, a five-unit increase in HPP was associated with a 17% increase in the hazard ratio of mortality (HR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26 p < 0.001). This result was confirmed in a multiple Cox model adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, systolic arterial pressure, and dialysis adequacy (HR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.12-1.52, p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained considering the combined event death-CV events as an outcome. Home pulse pressure represents, in part, arterial stiffness, and it is strongly related to all-cause mortality in peritoneal patients. In these high cardiovascular risk populations, it is important to maintain optimal blood pressure control, but it is fundamental to consider all the other cardiovascular risk indicators, such as pulse pressure. Home pulse pressure measurement is easy and feasible and can add important information for the identification and management of high-risk patients.

Peridialytic and intradialytic blood pressure metrics are not valid estimates of 44-h ambulatory blood pressure in patients with intradialytic hypertension

PURPOSE

In contrast to peridialytic blood pressure (BP), intradialytic and home BP measurements are accurate metrics of ambulatory BP load in hemodialysis patients. This study assessed the agreement of peridialytic, intradialytic, and scheduled interdialytic recordings with 44-h BP in a distinct hemodialysis population, patients with intradialytic hypertension (IDH).

METHODS

This study included 45 IDH patients with valid 48-h ABPM and 197 without IDH. With 44-h BP used as reference method, we tested the accuracy of the following BP metrics: Pre- and post-dialysis, mean and median intradialytic, mean intradialytic plus pre/post-dialysis, and scheduled interdialytic BP (out-of-dialysis day: mean of 8:00am/8:00 pm readings).

RESULTS

In IDH patients, peridialytic and intradialytic BP metrics showed at best moderate correlations, while averaged interdialytic SBP/DBP exhibited strong correlation (r = 0.882/r = 0.855) with 44-h SBP/DBP. Bland-Altman plots showed large between-method-difference for peri- and intradialytic-BP, but only + 0.7 mmHg between-method difference and good 95% limits of agreement for averaged interdialytic SBP. The sensitivity/specificity and κ-statistic for diagnosing 44-h SBP ≥ 130 mmHg were low for pre-dialysis (72.5/40.0%, κ-statistic = 0.074) and post-dialysis (90.0/0.0%, κ-statistic = - 0.110), mean intradialytic (85.0/40.0%, κ-statistic = 0.198), median intradialytic (85.0/60.0%, κ-statistic = 0.333), and intradialytic plus pre/post-dialysis SBP (85.0/20.0%, κ-statistic = 0.043). Averaged interdialytic SBP showed high sensitivity/specificity (97.5/80.0%) and strong agreement (κ-statistic = 0.775). In ROC analyses, scheduled interdialytic SBP/DBP had the highest AUC (0.967/0.951), sensitivity (90.0/88.0%), and specificity (100.0/90.0%).

CONCLUSION

In IDH patients, only averaged scheduled interdialytic but not pre- and post-dialysis, nor intradialytic BP recordings show reasonable agreement with ABPM. Interdialytic BP recordings only could be used for hypertension diagnosis and management in these subjects.

Nitric Oxide Levels as a Marker of Intradialytic Hypertension in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is an important emerging complication in hemodialysis patients. No study has examined the diagnostic markers of various risk factors for the occurrence of IDH in chronic hemodialysis patients. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the use of nitric oxide (NO) as a marker of IDH among end-stage renal disease patients. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (40 patients) with IDH and Group II (40 patients) without IDH. For all participants, a full medical history was taken, followed by laboratory examinations to measure the level of NO and a clinical examination. The dose of erythropoietin per week, the level of intact parathyroid hormone, and platelet count were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II, whereas the mean level of NO (2.10 ± 1.23 pmol/L) was highly significantly lower in patients with IDH (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that hypertension (odds ratio: 1.824, 95% confidence interval: 1.273-2.982) and the level of NO (odds ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-2.97) were independent risk factors for IDH. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cutoff point of NO was 2.52 μmol/L to differentiate between cases with and without IDH (area under the curve = 0.844). Our findings support previous research regarding the involvement of endothelial dysfunction and a higher sodium level in the pathogenesis of IDH. We also found that the NO level had a good diagnostic value for the occurrence of IDH at a cutoff of 2.52 μmol/L.

Frequency of Intradialytic Hypertension Using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Suggested Definition in a Single Hemodialysis Centre in Pakistan

OBJECTIVES

 To estimate the frequency of intradialytic hypertension (IDH) in our centre as per the definition suggested by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).

METHODS

 A cross-sectional study was conducted at the dialysis department of The Kidney Centre Post Graduate Training Institute (PGTI) Karachi, Pakistan from August 2021 to October 2021 among 263 end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) aged ≥ 18 years of both genders. The study outcome was the frequency of IDH as per the latest KDIGO suggested definition i.e., systolic blood pressure (SBP) rise of > 10 mm Hg from pre- to post-dialysis within the hypertensive range in at least four out of six consecutive dialysis treatments. Frequencies (%) and mean (±SD) were calculated for categorical and continuous variables respectively, using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

 Among 263 patients, the mean age was 51.02 (±14.1) years and 56.3% were males. Around 30.8% of patients were dialysis-dependent for 1.1 to three years. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (88.6%). Standard dialysate calcium of 3mEq/l was received by 91.6% of study participants. About 78.7% of patients were using antihypertensive(s), out of which 85.5% were compliant and 37.6% were using a single antihypertensive. The most common antihypertensive in use was beta-blockers (78.3%). Around 16% of patients were found to have IDH. Age of the patients was significantly associated with IDH (p=0.038). The majority of the patients with IDH were those who were taking anti-hypertension medications as compared to the patients who were not taking them (p <0.004). Interdialytic weight gain was not a significant predictor for IDH.

CONCLUSION

 The frequency of IDH was 16% according to the latest suggested KDIGO definition. This is much lower than regional and global estimates according to earlier definitions. There is a dire need to establish a standardized definition of IDH in guidelines to diagnose, manage and compare data. Also, the association of IDH with fluid overload is not found in our study which emphasizes the need to evaluate other causative factors.

Ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness in patients with and without intradialytic hypertension

BACKGROUND

Increased arterial stiffness is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of intradialytic-hypertension (IDH). Ambulatory pulse-wave-velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor for all-cause-mortality in haemodialysis and its prognostic power is better than office PWV. This is the first study examining ambulatory central blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness parameters in patients with and without IDH.

METHODS

This study examined 45 patients with IDH (SBP rise ≥10 mmHg from pre- to post-dialysis and post-dialysis SBP ≥150 mmHg) in comparison with 197 patients without IDH. All participants underwent 48-h ABPM with Mobil-O-Graph-NG; parameters of central haemodynamics, wave reflection and PWV were estimated.

RESULTS

Age, dialysis vintage and interdialytic weight gain did not differ between-groups. IDH patients had higher 48-h cSBP (131.7 ± 16.2 vs. 119.2 ± 15.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), 48-h cDBP (86.7 ± 12.7 vs. 79.6 ± 11.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and 48-h cPP (45.5 ± 10.4 vs. 39.8 ± 10.0 mmHg, p = 0.001) compared to patients without IDH. Similarly, during day- and nighttime periods, cSBP/cDBP and cPP levels were higher in IDH-patients compared to non-IDH. Forty-eight-hour augmentation pressure and index, but not AIx(75) were higher in IDH patients; 48-h PWV (10.0 ± 2.0 vs. 9.2 ± 2.1 m/s, p = 0.017) was significantly higher in patients with IDH. The two study groups displayed different trajectories in central BP and PWV over the course of the recording; IDH patients had steadily high values of the above variables during the 2 days of the interdialytic-interval, whereas non-IDH patients showed a gradual elevation, with significant increases from the 1st to 2nd 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

IDH patients have significantly higher levels of ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness parameters and a different course over the 48-h period compared with non-IDH patients. Increased arterial stiffness could be a prominent factor associated with the high burden of cardiovascular disease in this population.

Intradialytic hypertension: epidemiology and pathophysiology of a silent killer

The term intradialytic hypertension (IDH) describes a paradoxical rise in blood pressure (BP) during or immediately after the hemodialysis session. Although it was formerly considered a phenomenon without clinical implications, current evidence suggests that IDH may affect up to 15% of hemodialysis patients and exhibit independent associations with future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, during the last decade, several studies have tried to elucidate the complex pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon. Volume overload, intradialytic sodium gain, overactivity of the sympathetic-nervous-system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, endothelial dysfunction and dialysis-related electrolyte disturbances have been proposed to be involved in the pathogenesis of the BP increase during hemodialysis. This review attempts to summarize existing evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of the distinct phenomenon of IDH.

Association of Different Definitions of Intradialytic Hypertension With Long-Term Mortality in Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is common in hemodialysis patients. A subset of patients experience systolic blood pressure increases from prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis (intradialytic hypertension), which are associated with adverse outcomes. However, little consensus exists on an evidence-based definition.

METHODS

In 3198 hemodialysis patients, Cox models were fit to examine the association of various definitions of intradialytic hypertension (≥30% of baseline sessions with an increase in prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis systolic blood pressure of (1) ≥0 mm Hg [Hyper0]; (2) ≥10 mm Hg [Hyper10], or (3) ≥20 mm Hg increase [Hyper20]) with all-cause mortality. Effect modification was assessed using interaction terms according to prespecified variables.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean age was 62±15 years, 57% were male, and 14% were Black. During the baseline period, 47% of individuals met the Hyper0 definition and experienced 32% (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.05-1.66]) higher adjusted risk of death, compared with no systolic blood pressure increase. Hyper10 was present in 21.2% and associated with 18% higher adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.94-1.48]). Hyper20 was present in 6.8% and associated with 3% higher adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% CI, 0.74-1.44]). Effect modification by age and peripheral vascular disease was observed (P interaction=0.04 for age and 0.02 for peripheral vascular disease), with higher associated risk of death for those aged 45 to 70 years and those without peripheral vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with any systolic blood pressure increase from prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis had the highest adjusted risk of mortality, compared with other threshold-based definitions.

The associations between orthostatic blood pressure changes and extracellular volume in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Extracellular volume (ECV) predicts mortality in hemodialysis patients, but it is difficult to assess clinically. Peridialytic blood pressure (BP) measurements can help ECV assessment. Orthostatic BP is routinely measured clinically, but its association with ECV is unknown.

METHODS

In a cohort of hypertensive hemodialysis patients, we measured posthemodialysis ECV/weight with bioimpedance spectroscopy and analyzed its association with post-HD orthostatic BP measurements obtained during routine care. Using linear and logistic regression, the primary outcomes were orthostatic BP change and orthostatic hypotension (OH) defined by systolic BP decrease of at least 20 mmHg or diastolic decrease of at least 10 mmHg. Model 1 controlled for sex, age, and diabetes. Model 2 additionally controlled for ultrafiltration rate and antihypertensive medications. We conducted sensitivity analysis using OH definition of systolic BP decrease of at least 30 mmHg.

FINDINGS

Among 57 participants, mean orthostatic systolic BP change was -7.30 (20) mmHg and mean ECV/weight was 0.24 (0.04) L/kg. Post-HD ECV/weight was not associated with orthostatic systolic BP change (β = 8.2, p = 0.6). There were 16 participants with and 41 participants without OH. The ECV/weight did not differ between these groups (0.22 [0.04] vs. 0.24 [0.05] L/Kg, p = 0.09) and did not predict OH in logistic regression (OR 11, 4.04; 95% CI 0.2-671, 0.03-0.530 in the two models.) In a sensitivity analysis, ECV/weight was lower in the OH group (0.22 [0.03] vs. 0.25 [0.04] L/kg, p = 0.005), but this was accompanied by differences in sex and diabetes. Using logistic regression, there was no independent association between ECV/weight with OH.

DISCUSSION

Orthostatic systolic BP change after HD completion is not a reliable indicator of posthemodialysis ECV. When considering other factors associated with orthostatic BP, ECV/weight is not independently associated with OH. Although transient postdialytic differences in intravascular volume may be associated with OH, posthemodialysis OH does not necessarily indicate ECV depletion.

Comparison of intradialytic blood pressure metrics as predictors of all-cause mortality

Background

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) has been reported to be an important prognostic factor in hemodialysis patients. However, a standard definition of IDH has not yet been determined.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed blood pressure (BP) metrics obtained during serial dialysis sessions over a 90-day period from a single dialysis center from 2016 to 2017. The mean values and the frequency of specific values of BP were analyzed as predictors of 3-year mortality.

Results

A total of 430 patients who underwent maintenance dialysis were included. The mean age was 63.3 ± 12.4 years and 58.6% were male. A low minimum systolic blood pressure (SBP) <110 mmHg during dialysis was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality. The frequency of a minimum SBP <100 mmHg was the most significant predictor of 3-year mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722. Furthermore, the frequency of a minimum SBP <100 mmHg significantly increased the predictability of mortality when combined with the presence of other clinical factors including age, body mass index and vascular access type (AUC 0.786 vs. 0.835; p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Among the various intradialytic BP metrics, the frequency of a minimum SBP <100 mmHg is the most significant factor related to all-cause mortality. The guidelines for the management of blood pressure in dialysis patients should consider including a minimum SBP <100 mmHg as a definition for IDH.

Weekly pattern of dialysis unit blood pressure is a promising marker for prognosis evaluation in hemodialysis population

BACKGROUND

Dialysis unit blood pressure (BP) pattern showed superiority in prognostic evaluation and interdialytic BP burden assessment. However previous studies mainly focused on the recurrent BP pattern within a session (intradialytic BP change or intradialytic BP slope), the clinical value of the weekly pattern of dialysis unit BP is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in adult end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD). The slope and the change of the postdialysis systolic BP (SBP) in the course of a week (post-SBP slope and post-SBP change) were used to characterize the weekly pattern of dialysis unit BP. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and first cardiovascular event. We also measured the home BP in our cohort.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine subjects were followed over a median of 31 months. Higher post-SBP slope (≥0.185) was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and first cardiovascular event. Results were similar for increased post-SBP change. HD patients with a higher post-SBP slope or an increased post-SBP change also had significant increased interdialytic BP burden measured by home SBP on both dialysis days and non-dialysis days.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SBP slope and post-SBP change might be promising dialysis unit BP markers for prognostic evaluation and interdialytic BP burden assessment.

Changes in total and segmental extracellular and intracellular volumes with hypotension during hemodialysis measured with bioimpedance spectroscopy

BACKGROUND

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices have been advocated to guide volume management in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We hypothesized that understanding the dynamics of fluid shifts in different body segments may provide additional insight on preventive measures to reduce the risk of intradialytic hypotension.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted among 42 HD patients at risk of hypotension who were admitted as emergencies inpatient.

RESULTS

A total of 191 BIA measurements were made during the 42 HD sessions, and hypotension occurred during 52 measurements (27%). The extracellular water (ECW) to intracellular water ratio (EIR) was measured in different body segments and declined significantly only in the non-access arm with increasing HD session duration (β = -0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.05 to -0.03, p < 0.01). There was no significant association between EIR and hypotension with respect to the different body segments. Only pre-HD N-terminal-pro b-type natriuretic peptide was significantly associated with hypotension (β = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.89, p = 0.04). There was no association between relative blood volume monitoring change and EIR.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we found that segmental BIA during HD was unable to detect or predict hypotension during dialysis. Although BIA is able to provide information about ECW and guide clinical assessment of volume in HD patients prior to dialysis, our findings did not suggest the use of serial measurements of changes in EIR in different body segments during HD provided sufficient information to predict intradialytic hypotension. Similarly, changes in EIR did not provide information on changes in plasma volume that could potentially trigger interventions to prevent or reduce intra-dialytic hypotension.

Hypertensive emergency and seizures during haemodialysis

Intracranial abscesses are uncommon, serious and life-threatening infections. A brain abscess is caused by inflammation and collection of infected material, coming from local or remote infectious sources. Patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis are prone to invasive bacterial infections like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) especially in the presence of central venous catheters or arteriovenous grafts. However, intracranial abscess formation due to MRSA is rare. Here, we present a case of MRSA brain abscess with an atypical clinical presentation in the absence of traditional risk factors.Intracranial abscesses are uncommon, serious, and life-threatening infections. A Brain abscess is caused by inflammation and collection of infected material, coming from local or remote infectious sources. Patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis are prone to invasive bacterial infections like methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) especially in the presence of central venous catheters or arterio-venous grafts. However intracranial abscess formation due to MRSA is rare. Here we present a case of MRSA brain abscess with an atypical clinical presentation in the absence of traditional risk factors. A 46-year-old male with chronic kidney disease (CKD) secondary to chronic glomerulonephritis, on haemodialysis for 4 years through a left brachio-cephalic AVF developed an episode of generalised tonic-clonic seizures lasting 2 min during his scheduled dialysis session. He reported no complaints before entry to the dialysis. On clinical examination, he was drowsy with the absence of any focal motor deficits. His blood pressure was recorded to be 200/120 mm Hg. He was managed in the intensive care unit with mechanical ventilation, intravenous nitroglycerine for blood pressure control, levetiracetam for seizures and empirical vancomycin. Radiological evaluation showed a brain abscess in the midline involving bosth basi-frontal lobes. After medical optimization, the abscess was drained surgically, and the pus cultured. As culture grew Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, he was treated with intravenous vancomycin for 6 weeks. On follow up, the abscess had resolved and the patient recovered without any neurological deficits.

Lower Levels of Blood Zinc Associated with Intradialytic Hypertension in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Intradialytic hypertension (iHTN) has been related with an increased risk of mortality, with imbalances in trace elements being frequent in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships between the levels of blood trace elements and iHTN in MHD patients. A total of 144 MHD patients were enrolled in September, 2019 (66 females; 5616 hemodialysis treatments), with a mean age of 64.33 ± 13.39 years and median vintage of 33.50 (16.25-57.50) months. Patients exhibited an average peridialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) change of - 4.18 ± 20.22 mm Hg in the next 3 months. Thirty-four (23.6%) patients had persistent iHTN (piHTN). These patients were characterized by older age, higher rate of hypozincemia, and modified Charlson comorbidity score, whereas lower blood zinc and hemoglobin, at the time of their recruitment. No significant difference in the levels of other blood trace elements was observed between groups. A general linear mixed (GLM) model showed that with every mg/L point lower mean blood zinc at baseline, the peridialytic SBP change was increased by 4.524 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Binary logistic model in modulate of the GLM model revealed that the lower level of blood zinc was associated with piHTN (OR = 0.433, 95 % CI 0.295 to 0.637, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed both above results. Our study indicated that lower blood zinc was independently associated with piHTN in patients undergoing MHD, but prospective studies with larger population are still needed.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Cerebrovascular Disease: Consensus and Guidance From a KDIGO Controversies Conference

The global health burden of chronic kidney disease is rapidly rising, and chronic kidney disease is an important risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. Proposed underlying mechanisms for this relationship include shared traditional risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes, uremia-related nontraditional risk factors, such as oxidative stress and abnormal calcium-phosphorus metabolism, and dialysis-specific factors such as cerebral hypoperfusion and changes in cardiac structure. Chronic kidney disease frequently complicates routine stroke risk prediction, diagnosis, management, and prevention. It is also associated with worse stroke severity, outcomes and a high burden of silent cerebrovascular disease, and vascular cognitive impairment. Here, we present a summary of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cerebrovascular disease in chronic kidney disease from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Controversies Conference on central and peripheral arterial disease with a focus on knowledge gaps, areas of controversy, and priorities for research.

The effect of ambient temperature on blood pressure of patients undergoing hemodialysis in the Pantanal-Brazil

The objective was to analyze the association of changes in pre-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure with air temperature in a municipality in the Brazilian Pantanal, a tropical climate area. Longitudinal panel study, with analysis of mixed effects models of 133 hemodialysis patients in the city of Cáceres-Mato Grosso in 2014. Air temperature showed an inverse association with pre-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure. With each increase of 1 °C in the mean air temperature, the pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure decreases -0.730mmHg (p ≤ 0.000) and the pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure decreases -0.280mmHg (p ≤ 0.000). The estimated effect was greater for systolic blood pressure, but both pre-dialysis blood pressure measures are reduced with an increase in lag (up to two days), even when adjusted for relative air humidity. Air temperature is determinant for changes in pre-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hemodialysis patients. The temperature effect was greater for systolic blood pressure than for diastolic blood pressure.

Serum sodium variation is a major determinant of peridialytic blood pressure trends in haemodialysis outpatients

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and peridialytic blood pressure (BP) trends are associated with morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. We aimed to characterise the respective influence of volume status and small solutes variation on peridialytic systolic BP (SBP) trends during HD. We retrospectively analysed the relative peridialytic SBP decrease in 647 prevalent outpatients attending for their mid-week session with corresponding pre- and post-HD bioelectrical impedance analysis. Mean SBP decreased by 10.5 ± 23.6 mmHg. Factors positively associated with the relative decrease in SBP were: serum sodium (Na) decrease, body mass index, serum albumin, dialysis vintage, ultrafiltration rate and urea Kt/V (p < 0.05 for all). Antihypertensive medications and higher dialysate calcium were negatively associated with the relative decrease in SBP (p < 0.05 for both). Age had a quadratic relationship with SBP trends (p < 0.05). Pre-HD volume status measured by extracellular to total body water ratio was not associated with SBP variation (p = 0.216). Peridialytic SBP trends represent a continuum with serum Na variation being a major determinant while volume status has negligible influence. Middle-aged and overweight patients are particularly prone to SBP decline. Tailoring Na and calcium dialysate concentrations could influence haemodynamic stability during HD and improve patient experience and outcomes.

Low central blood pressure and sympathetic activity predispose for the development of intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) may lead to a poor life quality and was associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients under hemodialysis. This study investigated the autonomic nerve and cardiovascular function in the IDH episodes.In this case-control study, 70 end stage renal disease patients (198 visits) were recruited. Pulse wave analysis and heart rate variability were evaluated before hemodialysis. Two definitions of IDH were confirmed by medical records. IDH-f indicated a drop of systolic blood pressure or mean arterial pressure, accompanied with symptoms; IDH-n indicated a low nadir systolic pressure during the hemodialysis. All parameters were evaluated for the possible predisposing factors under each definition.A total of 24 IDH-f and 37 IDH-n were noted in 177 visits. For both definitions, central pulse pressure seemed to be a consistent predisposing factor. Furthermore, lower sympathetic activity (odds ratio [OR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.87), lower pulse pressure (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.98), and higher augmentation index (OR 17.36; 95% CI 1.48-204.10) were the possible predisposing factors for IDH-f. On the contrary, lower mean arterial pressure (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98) was identified as the possible factor for IDH-n.It was suggested that the lower central pulse pressure and sympathetic activity might be involved in the development of IDH.

Diastolic blood pressure is associated with brain atrophy in hemodialysis patients: A single center case-control study

Brain atrophy (BA) is often found in neuroimaging of hemodialysis patients, representing parenchymal cerebral damage. Likely contributing factors to BA are age, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors of atherosclerosis that are also common among hemodialysis patients. BA may also occur due to focal ischemia and hypoperfusion during hemodialysis. However, data on optimal blood pressure (BP) in these patients are limited. The goal of this study was to determine whether the prevalence and severity of BA would be higher among hemodialysis patients with lower BP. A blinded neuroradiologist graded BA of all hemodialysis patients who underwent brain non-contrast computerized tomography (CT) from 2015 to 2017 in our institution. Age- and sex-matched patients with normal kidney function who underwent brain CT during the same period and technique served as the control group. A total of 280 patients were included in this retrospective study, with average BP of 140/70 mmHg among hemodialysis patients and 142/75 mmHg in the control group. BA was more common in dialysis patients and its severity increased with age and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. We observed a significant negative correlation between diastolic BP (DBP) at dialysis initiation and BA. Average DBP decreased with increasing severity of BA. These findings were observed in both hemodialysis and non-CKD patients. BA was associated with lower DBP, which may induce cerebral hypoperfusion and ischemia. This finding should discourage over-treatment of hypertension among hemodialysis patients.

Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Intradialytic Hypotension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intradialytic hypotension has high clinical significance. However, predicting it using conventional statistical models may be difficult because several factors have interactive and complex effects on the risk. Herein, we applied a deep learning model (recurrent neural network) to predict the risk of intradialytic hypotension using a timestamp-bearing dataset.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We obtained 261,647 hemodialysis sessions with 1,600,531 independent timestamps (i.e., time-varying vital signs) and randomly divided them into training (70%), validation (5%), calibration (5%), and testing (20%) sets. Intradialytic hypotension was defined when nadir systolic BP was <90 mm Hg (termed intradialytic hypotension 1) or when a decrease in systolic BP ≥20 mm Hg and/or a decrease in mean arterial pressure ≥10 mm Hg on the basis of the initial BPs (termed intradialytic hypotension 2) or prediction time BPs (termed intradialytic hypotension 3) occurred within 1 hour. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the precision-recall curves, and F1 scores obtained using the recurrent neural network model were compared with those obtained using multilayer perceptron, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The recurrent neural network model for predicting intradialytic hypotension 1 achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 (95% confidence intervals, 0.94 to 0.94), which was higher than those obtained using the other models (P<0.001). The recurrent neural network model for predicting intradialytic hypotension 2 and intradialytic hypotension 3 achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.87 (interquartile range, 0.87-0.87) and 0.79 (interquartile range, 0.79-0.79), respectively, which were also higher than those obtained using the other models (P≤0.001). The area under the precision-recall curve and F1 score were higher using the recurrent neural network model than they were using the other models. The recurrent neural network models for intradialytic hypotension were highly calibrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our deep learning model can be used to predict the real-time risk of intradialytic hypotension.

Obesity, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Kidney Transplantation: An Evolving Relationship

Obesity has a fundamental role in driving the global kidney disease burden. The perplexing relationship of obesity with chronic kidney disease remains debated. However, a thorough understanding of the interplay of obesity in conjunction with chronic kidney disease and appropriate management options is lacking, leading to further increases in morbidity and mortality. Moreover, underutilization of bariatric procedures and unrealistic expectations of weight reduction based on body mass index, leading to poor access to kidney transplantation, are fueling the fire. In this review, we summarize the available data related to the obesity and chronic kidney disease association and its novel management options.

Association of all-cause mortality with pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure and its peridialytic change in chronic hemodialysis patients

Background

Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure (pre-HD SBP) and peridialytic SBP change have been associated with morbidity and mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients in previous studies, but the nature of their interaction is not well understood.

Methods

We analyzed pre-HD SBP and peridialytic SBP change (calculated as post-HD SBP minus pre-HD SBP) between January 2001 and December 2012 in HD patients treated in US Fresenius Medical Care facilities. The baseline period was defined as Months 4–6 after HD initiation, and all-cause mortality was noted during follow-up. Only patients who survived baseline and had no missing covariates were included. Censoring events were renal transplantation, modality change or study end. We fitted a Cox proportional hazard model with a bivariate spline functions for the primary predictors (pre-HD SBP and peridialytic SBP change) with adjustment for age, gender, race, diabetes, access-type, relative interdialytic weight gain, body mass index, albumin, equilibrated normalized protein catabolic rate and ultrafiltration rate.

Results

A total of 172 199 patients were included. Mean age was 62.1 years, 61.6% were white and 55% were male. During a median follow-up of 25.0 months, 73 529 patients (42.7%) died. We found that a peridialytic SBP rise combined with high pre-HD SBP was associated with higher mortality. In contrast, when concurrent with low pre-HD SBP, a peridialytic SBP rise was associated with better survival.

Conclusion

The association of pre-HD and peridialytic SBP change with mortality is complex. Our findings call for a joint, not isolated, interpretation of pre-HD SBP and peridialytic SBP change.

Management of acute intradialytic cardiovascular complications: Updated overview (Review)

An increasing number of patients require renal replacement therapy through dialysis and renal transplantation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects a large percentage of the world's population and has evolved into a major public health concern. Diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and a family history of kidney failure are all major risk factors for CKD. Patients in advanced stages of CKD have varying degrees of cardiovascular damage. Comorbidities of these patients, include, on the one hand, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia and, on the other hand, the presence of mineral-bone disorders associated with CKD and chronic inflammation, which contribute to cardiovascular involvement. Acute complications occur quite frequently during dialysis. Among these, the most important are cardiovascular complications, which influence the morbidity and mortality rates of this group of patients. Chronic hemodialysis patients manifest acute cardiovascular complications such as intradialytic hypotension, intradialytic hypertension, arrhythmias, acute coronary syndromes and sudden death. Thus, proper management is extremely important.

Paradoxical Association Between Intradialytic Blood Pressure Change and Long-Term Mortality with Different Levels of Interdialytic Weight Gain

Background

A greater interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) implies a greater ultrafiltration rate, which might lead to hemodynamic instability and intradialytic blood pressure (BP) change in hemodialysis patients. However, current studies have not explicated the impact of IDWG on the association between intradialytic BP changes and prognosis, especially in patients without cardiac dysfunction and diabetes. In this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between absolute intradialytic BP changes and mortality with different IDWG levels.

Methods

A total of 204 hemodialysis patients (without cardiac dysfunction and diabetes) were included in this prospective observation study, with a mean follow-up of 55.32±20.99 months. Initially, we collected IDWG, IDWG% (percentages according to dry weight), and pre-/post-BPs of 36 consecutive dialysis sessions during three months enrollment. And the average value of them was defined as baseline value. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts according to IDWG% tertiles (<3.3%, 3.3%-4.6%, ≥4.6%). Comparisons between different tertiles were analyzed.

Results

Compared to the low IDWG% group (tertile 1, T1), patients of high IDWG% group (tertile 3, T3) were younger, had higher ultrafiltration rate, less residual kidney function, lower BMI and dry weight, longer dialysis vintage and higher N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide levels (P<0.05). Correlations were found between IDWG% and intradialytic BP changes. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression model adjusted for demographic data, dialysis information and predialysis BPs indicated that greater absolute intradialytic BP changes were associated with worse prognosis in T1 group (P<0.05). While in T3 group, less absolute intradialytic BP changes were associated with higher mortality (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There is a paradoxical association between absolute intradialytic BP changes and long-term mortality with different IDWG levels. Both BP stability and volume balance are crucial to patients' prognosis.

Ischemic heart disease cause of intradialytic hypertension in a patient with diabetic nephropathy

A 73-year-old Japanese man was admitted with extreme intradialytic hypertension of four months' duration that was refractory to antihypertensive agents. He had started hemodialysis five years previously because of diabetic nephropathy. Coronary angiography revealed coronary artery disease with significant stenosis of the left main trunk and the right coronary artery, and he underwent a coronary artery bypass graft. Thereafter, the intradialytic hypertension disappeared. Ischemic heart disease appears to be one cause of intradialytic hypertension. <Learning objective: Intradialytic hypertension occurs in some patients with hemodialysis. Such patients are at increased risk for mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms remain unknown, ischemic heart disease appears to be one cause of intradialytic hypertension.>.

The Effects of Nebivolol and Irbesartan on Ambulatory Aortic Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Hemodialysis Patients with Intradialytic Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypertension occurs in 5-15% of hemodialysis patients and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but the responsible mechanisms remain unknown. This study examined the effects of nebivolol and irbesartan on ambulatory central blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, and wave-reflection parameters in patients with intradialytic hypertension.

METHODS

This is a prespecified analysis of a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study in 38 hemodialysis patients with intradialytic hypertension. Patients were randomized to nebivolol 5 mg followed byirbesartan 150 mg, or vice versa. In a non-randomized manner, the first half of the patients (n = 19) received a single drug dose 1 h prior to dialysis session and the remaining received the drugs for a whole week before the evaluation. Ambulatory central BP, arterial stiffness, and wave-reflection parameters were estimated with Mobil-O-Graph NG device, during a midweek dialysis day.

RESULTS

Intake of a single dose of nebivolol or irbesartan resulted in lower postdialysis central systolic BP (c-SBP) (baseline: 140.9 ± 15.4; nebivolol: 130.3 ± 19.5, p = 0.009; irbesartan: 127.3 ± 24.4 mm Hg, p = 0.007). Single-dose nebivolol also produced marginally lower 24-h c-SBP (p = 0.064) and lower 24-h central diastolic BP (c-DBP) (p = 0.029). Weekly administration of both drugs reduced postdialysis c-SBP (baseline: 144.1 ± 15.3; nebivolol: 131.8 ± 14.1, p = 0.014; irbesartan: 126.4 ± 17.8, p = 0.001) and 24-h c-SBP and c-DBP (baseline: 135.5 ± 10.3/91.9 ± 9.2; nebivolol: 126.4 ± 8.4/86.6 ± 7.2, p < 0.001/p = 0.002; irbesartan: 128.7 ± 11.6/87.0 ± 9.4, p = 0.061/p = 0.051 mm Hg). Single-dose intake of both drugs did not affect heart rate-adjusted augmentation index [AIx(75)], but decreased postdialysis pulse wave velocity (PWV). Importantly, weekly administration of both drugs reduced 24-h PWV (baseline: 10.0 ± 2.5; nebivolol: 9.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.012; irbesartan: 9.7 ± 2.7, p = 0.041). In between drug-group comparisons, no significant differences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized evaluation on the effects of pharmacological interventions on central BP and PWV in patients with intradialytic hypertension. Weekly administration of both nebivolol and irbesartan reduced 24-h central BP and PWV, but not AIx(75).

Predictive modeling of blood pressure during hemodialysis: a comparison of linear model, random forest, support vector regression, XGBoost, LASSO regression and ensemble method

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is commonly occurred and links to higher mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Its early prediction and prevention will dramatically improve the quality of life. However, predicting the occurrence of IDH clinically is not simple. The aims of this study are to develop an intelligent system with capability of predicting blood pressure (BP) during HD, and to further compare different machine learning algorithms for next systolic BP (SBP) prediction.

METHODS

This study presented comprehensive comparisons among linear regression model, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), tree-based ensemble machine learning models (random forest [RF] and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]), and support vector regression to predict the BP during HD treatment based on 200 and 48 maintenance HD patients containing a total of 7,180 and 2,065 BP records for the training and test dataset, respectively. Ensemble method also was computed to obtain better predictive performance. We compared the developed models based on R², root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE).

RESULTS

We found that RF (R²=0.95, RMSE=6.64, MAE=4.90) and XGBoost (R²=1.00, RMSE=1.83, MAE=1.29) had comparable predictive performance on the training dataset. However, RF (R²=0.49, RMSE=16.24, MAE=12.14) had more accurate than XGBoost (R²=0.41, RMSE=17.65, MAE=13.47) on testing dataset. Among these models, the ensemble method (R²=0.50, RMSE=16.01, MAE=11.97) had the best performance on testing dataset for next SBP prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

We compared five machine learning and an ensemble method for next SBP prediction. Among all studied algorithms, the RF and the ensemble method have the better predictive performance. The prediction models using ensemble method for intradialytic BP profiling may be able to assist the HD staff or physicians in individualized care and prompt intervention for patients' safety and improve care of HD patients.

The effects of extracellular volume and intradialytic peripheral resistance changes on ambulatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients with and without recurrent intradialytic hypertension

Background

Hypertension and extracellular volume (ECV) overload are interrelated mortality risk factors in hemodialysis (HD) patients, but confounding related to changes in ECV and vasoconstriction during and between treatments obfuscate their relationship. We sought to clarify independent contributions of post-HD ECV and intradialytic changes in vasoconstriction on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in patients with and without recurrent intradialytic hypertension (IH).

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we obtained measurements of pre- and post-HD ECV with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), pre- and post-HD total peripheral resistance index and 44-h ambulatory BP. Linear regression determined associations between post-HD ECV/weight and intradialytic change in total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) with interdialytic BP and slope.

Results

In fully-adjusted models for participants with complete data, post-HD ECV/weight associated with mean ambulatory BP (β = 133, P = 0.01; n = 52) and ambulatory BP slope (β = −4.28, P = 0.03; n = 42). ECV/weight was associated with mean ambulatory BP in those with recurrent IH (β = 314, P = 0.0005; n = 16) and with ambulatory BP slope in those without recurrent IH (β = −4.56, P = 0.04; n = 28). Interdialytic weight gain percentage and intradialytic TPRI change were not associated with ambulatory BP or slope in any analyses.

Conclusion

Ambulatory BP in HD patients is more strongly associated with post-HD ECV assessed with BIS than with intradialytic TPRI changes or interdialytic ECV increases. These findings highlight the essential role of recognizing and managing chronic ECV overload to improve ambulatory BP in HD patients, particularly so for those with IH.

Análisis de la ultrafiltración media por sesión de los pacientes en una unidad de hemodiálisis

Introducción: En los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD), el ajuste erróneo del peso ideal puede llevarlos a la sobrecarga de líquido que puede desembocar en episodios de insuficiencia cardiaca o a la inversa, a una situación de bajo peso generando hipotensiones que pueden originar cardiopatía isquémica. Se estima como adecuada una ultrafiltración (UF) máxima de 10 ml/kg/h, valor por encima del cual está demostrado el aumento de la mortalidad. Objetivos: Analizar que tasa de ultrafiltración media usamos en nuestra unidad, y conocer qué porcentaje de pacientes sobrepasaban la ultrafiltración máxima recomendada. Material y Método: Realizamos un estudio observacional, prospectivo, en 58 pacientes en hemodiálisis, analizando la tasa de ultrafiltración expresada en ml/kg/h por sesión durante 6 meses. Se definió una tasa de UF>10 ml/kg/h como punto de corte para, según los criterios actuales de tasa adecuada, determinar que pacientes presentaban una UF superior a 10 ml/Kg/h en más de un 25% de las sesiones. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio la tasa media de UF de todos los pacientes fue de 8,78±2,76 ml/kg/h, aunque el porcentaje de sesiones por paciente con tasa de UF superior a 10 ml/kg/h fue de un 35,9±29,74%. Conclusión: Un porcentaje alto de pacientes presentan tasas de UF por encima de los valores recomendados. Se han de buscar estrategias para minimizar esta situación, donde la educación sanitaria sobre alimentación y el ajuste individualizado de las sesiones de diálisis son aspectos fundamentales.

Intradialytic hypotension prevalence, influencing factors, and nursing interventions: prospective results of 744 hemodialysis sessions

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate intradialytic hypotension (IDH) prevalence, influencing factors, and nursing interventions in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a private dialysis center. The patients were followed-up in terms of IDH development based on the European Best Practice Guidelines criteria during six consecutive HD sessions. The study followed the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 744 hemodialysis sessions of 124 patients were monitored. IDH developed in 51.6% of the patients and the prevalence was 17.60%. The most common nursing interventions were stopping ultrafiltration and isotonic saline solution administration. White blood cell (WBC) (p = 0.017) and creatinine (p = 0.005) values were statistically significantly higher in patients developing IDH. WBC was found to increase IDH development risk 0.796 times (95% CI [0.657-0.996], p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Nursing staff awareness regarding the frequency of IDH in hemodialysis patients and the related symptoms needs to be increased.

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Profiles during Hemodialysis in Patients with and without Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Although the dynamics of blood pressure (BP) during dialysis provide information related to the control system, the prognosis and relationships between temporal changes in intradialytic hemodynamic regulation, BP, and decreased cardiac function remain largely unclear.

METHODS

Hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance index, were recorded using a noninvasive hemodynamic device on a beat-by-beat basis in 40 patients on dialysis who were divided into three groups, i.e., those with and without BP lability and those with heart failure (HF). Statistical measurements, including mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), and index of nonrandomness of each hemodynamic parameter were derived from the three different phases divided equally during dialysis and compared using 3×3 two-way mixed-model analysis of variance to determine the effects of the different stages of hemodialysis (HD), cardiac function, and intradialytic changes in BP on the hemodynamic parameters. In addition, multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the association between the changes in the derived parameters and BP lability.

RESULTS

The average SV tended to decrease during HD in all groups (p = 0.041). A significant decrease was observed in the CV of SV between the first two stages of HD in patients with labile BP and HF when compared to those without labile BP (p = 0.037). Significant interactions between group and stage of the index of nonrandomness for HR were also noted; this index was significantly higher in patients without labile BP than in those with labile BP or HF (p = 0.048). A higher difference between the early and middle stages of HD for nonrandomness indexes of HR was an independent predictor of reduced BP lability during HD (HR = 0.844, 95% confidence interval 0.722-0.987, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in the CV of SV and the index of nonrandomness for HR during early-stage HD in response to decreased SV may be associated with better BP control during HD. This finding suggests that patients with more structurally meaningful hemodynamic control have a more favorable cardiovascular outcome.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over 24 h: A Latin American Society of Hypertension position paper-accessibility, clinical use and cost effectiveness of ABPM in Latin America in year 2020

Accurate office blood pressure measurement remains crucial in the diagnosis and management of hypertension worldwide, including Latin America (LA). Office blood pressure (OBP) measurement is still the leading technique in LA for screening and diagnosis of hypertension, monitoring of treatment, and long-term follow-up. Despite this, due to the increasing awareness of the limitations affecting OBP and to the accumulating evidence on the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), as a complement of OBP in the clinical approach to the hypertensive patient, a progressively greater attention has been paid worldwide to the information on daytime and nighttime BP patterns offered by 24-h ABPM in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of hypertension. In LA countries, most of the Scientific Societies of Hypertension and/or Cardiology have issued guidelines for hypertension care, and most of them include a special section on ABPM. Also, full guidelines on ABPM are available. However, despite the available evidence on the advantages of ABPM for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in LA, availability of ABPM is often restricted to cities with large population, and access to this technology by lower-income patients is sometimes limited by its excessive cost. The authors hope that this document might stimulate health authorities in each LA Country, as well as in other countries in the world, to regulate ABPM access and to widen the range of patients able to access the benefits of this technique.

The effects of nebivolol and irbesartan on postdialysis and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with intradialytic hypertension: a randomized cross-over study

OBJECTIVES

Intradialytic hypertension is estimated at 5-15% of hemodialysis patients and is associated with poor prognosis. Studies on therapeutic interventions for this entity are extremely few. We aimed to evaluate the effects of nebivolol and irbesartan on peridialytic, intradialytic, and ambulatory BP in patients with intradialytic hypertension.

METHODS

This is a pilot randomized-cross-over study in 38 hemodialysis patients (age: 60.4 ± 11.1 years, men: 65.8%) with intradialytic hypertension (intradialytic SBP rise ≥10 mmHg at ≥4 over six consecutive sessions]. After baseline evaluation, patients were randomly assigned to nebivolol 5 mg and subsequently irbesartan 150 mg, or vice versa. Nineteen patients received a single drug-dose 1 h before hemodialysis and 19 received the drug for a week before evaluation. A 2-week wash-out period took place before the initiation of the second drug. Patients had three respective 24-h ambulatory BP measurements starting before a midweek session.

RESULTS

In total, 20 (52.6%) patients received nebivolol first and 18 (47.4%) received irbesartan. Patients receiving a single dose of either drug had lower postdialysis BP (baseline: 160.2 ± 17.8/93.2 ± 13.6 mmHg; nebivolol: 148.0 ± 20.8/84.5 ± 13.1 mmHg, P = 0.013/P = 0.027; irbesartan 142.9 ± 29.9/87.2 ± 18.1 mmHg, P = 0.003/P = 0.104 for SBP and DBP, respectively). The 24-h BP presented a trend towards reduction, but was significant only for 24-h DBP in the nebivolol arm. Patients on weekly administration of either drug had lower postdialysis BP (baseline: 162.5 ± 16.8/95.4 ± 12.7 mmHg; nebivolol: 146.7 ± 16.3/91.8 ± 12.2 mmHg, P = 0.001/P = 0.235; irbesartan: 146.0 ± 23.9/85.8 ± 12.9 mmHg, P = 0.004/ P = 0.007, respectively), lower intradialytic BP and lower 24-h BP (baseline: 148.3 ± 12.6/90.2 ± 9.0 mmHg; nebivolol: 139.2 ± 10.6/85.0 ± 7.7 mmHg, P < 0.001/P = 0.001; irbesartan: 142.4 ± 16.4/85.1 ± 9.9 mmHg, P = 0.156/P = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in comparisons between the two drugs, with the exception of heart rate, being lower with nebivolol.

CONCLUSION

Both nebivolol and irbesartan reduced postdialysis and 24-h BP in patients with intradialytic hypertension. Weekly administration had greater effect and nebivolol was numerically slightly more potent than irbesartan.

Energy Requirement of Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Multiple Centers

BACKGROUND

Energy requirements must be estimated before nutritional care can be provided for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, the recommended caloric intake for patients has not been conclusively determined because of insufficiently large sample sizes.

METHOD

This cross-sectional observational study recruited patients undergoing long-term HD from multiple centers as well as people in the general population without chronic kidney disease. People from both groups were matched by sex and age. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was estimated using an indirect calorimeter. Two commonly used equations for estimating REE and daily energy requirement recommended by the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) were chosen.

RESULTS

This study had 154 HD patients and 33 matched HD-control group pairs. Age (r = -0.36, p < 0.01) and dry body weight after dialysis (r = -0.36, p < 0.01) and dry body weight after dialysis (.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and dry body weight are the main factors affecting the energy expenditure of HD patients. Furthermore, predicting the energy expenditure of HD patients by measuring the energy expenditure of their sedentary counterparts in the general population with the same sex, age range, and weight may yield better results than using traditional equations for predicting TEE. In East Asian populations, the TEE values were 32 and 30 kcal/kg dry weight for those aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. Future prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Alteration autonomic control of cardiac function during hemodialysis predict cardiovascular outcomes in end stage renal disease patients

Dialysis-induced hemodynamic instability has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality. However, the control mechanisms beneath the dynamic BP changes and cardiac function during hemodialysis and subsequent CV events are not known. We hypothesize that the impaired hemodynamic control can be prognostic indicators for subsequent CV events in end stage renal diseaes (ESRD) patients. To explore the association of hemodynamic parameters and CV events in hemodialysis patients, we enrolled ESRD patients who received chronic hemodialysis without documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hemodynamic parameters were continuously obtained from the impedance cardiography during hemodialysis. A total of 35 patients were enrolled. 16 patients developed hospitalized CV events. The statistical properties [coefficient of variance (standard deviation / mean value; CoV)] of hourly beat-to-beat dynamics of hemodynamic parameters were calculated. The CoV of stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (CI) between the 1^st and 2^nd hour of dialysis were significantly increased in patients without CV events compared to those with CV events. Higher CoV of SV_diff and CI_diff were significantly correlated with longer CV event-free survival, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed fair overall discriminative power (0.783 and 0.796, respectively). The responses of hemodynamic control mechanisms can be independent predictive indexes for lower hospitalized CV events, which implies that these patients who have better autonomic control systems may have better CV outcomes.