Incorporation of the bone marker carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen improves prognostic information of the International Staging System in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma

Prognostic and predictive biomarker developments in multiple myeloma

New approaches to stratify multiple myeloma patients based on prognosis and therapeutic decision-making, or prediction, are needed since patients are currently managed in a similar manner regardless of individual risk factors or disease characteristics. However, despite new and improved biomarkers for determining the prognosis of patients, there is currently insufficient information to utilise biomarkers to intensify, reduce or altogether change treatment, nor to target patient-specific biology in a so-called predictive manner. The ever-increasing number and complexity of drug classes to treat multiple myeloma have improved response rates and so clinically useful biomarkers will need to be relevant in the era of such novel therapies. Therefore, the field of multiple myeloma biomarker development is rapidly progressing, spurred on by new technologies and therapeutic approaches, and underpinned by a deeper understanding of tumour biology with individualised patient management the goal. In this review, we describe the main biomarker categories in multiple myeloma and relate these to diagnostic, prognostic and predictive applications.

High Expression of Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit A Which Is Regulated by Histone Acetylation, Acts as a Good Prognostic Factor of Multiple Myeloma Patients

Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will eventually relapse and current treatments have limited effect. Herein, we demonstrate that succinate dehydrogenase subunit A (SDHA) was low expressed in MM patients, and patients with SDHA relatively high expression had long overall survival and progression-free survival. Furthermore, SDHA high expression inhibited proliferation and invasion in MM cell lines and enhanced the anti-tumor and synergistic effect of chemotherapeutics. More importantly, chidamide was proved effective in MM by targeting SDHA, and expression of SDHA was increased by chidamide through acetylating H3K27 site of SDHA. Collectively, high expression of SDHA, which was regulated by histone acetylation and targeted by chidamide, might become a good prognostic factor of MM patients.

Proteomics-inspired precision medicine for treating and understanding multiple myeloma

Introduction

Remarkable progress in molecular characterization methods has led to significant improvements in how we manage multiple myeloma (MM). The introduction of novel therapies has led to significant improvements in overall survival over the past 10 years. However, MM remains incurable and treatment choice is largely based on outdated risk-adaptive strategies that do not factor in improved treatment outcomes in the context of modern therapies.

Areas covered

This review discusses current risk-adaptive strategies in MM and the clinical application of proteomics in the monitoring of treatment response, disease progression, and minimal residual disease (MRD). We also discuss promising biomarkers of disease progression, treatment response, and chemoresistance. Finally, we will discuss an immunomics-based approach to monoclonal antibody (mAb), vaccine, and CAR-T cell development.

Expert opinion

It is an exciting era in oncology with basic scientific knowledge translating in novel therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes. With the advent of effective immunotherapies and targeted therapies, it has become crucial to identify biomarkers to aid in the stratification of patients based on anticipated sensitivity to chemotherapy. As a paradigm of diseases highly dependent on protein homeostasis, multiple myeloma provides the perfect opportunity to investigate the use of proteomics to aid in precision medicine.

Multiple myeloma: is it time for biomarker-driven therapy?

Remarkable strides have been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms by which multiple myeloma develops, leading to more sophisticated classification that incorporates not only the traditional diagnostic criteria, but also immunophenotype, genetic, and molecular features. However, even with this added information, considerable heterogeneity in clinical outcomes exists within the identified subtypes. The present paradigm for myeloma treatment is built on the basic step of defining transplant eligibility versus noneligibility, as determined by age, performance status, and cumulative burden of comorbidities. An incredibly complex heterogeneous disease is, therefore, treated in a generalized way with the result that large interpatient variability exists in the outcome. As antimyeloma therapeutics continue to expand it is becoming even more crucial to personalize treatment approaches that provide the most value to a specific patient. Development of biomarkers, either individually or as larger sets or patterns and ranging from analysis of blood or bone marrow to biomedical imaging, is a major focus in the field. Biomarkers such as involved serum free light chain ratio and MRI focal lesions have been implemented in the new definition of multiple myeloma and guide clinicians to initiate treatment in otherwise asymptomatic individuals. Currently, however, there is not enough evidence to support intensifying the treatment for high-risk disease or reducing the treatment for low-risk disease. Minimal residual disease-negative status is an important biomarker that holds promise for monitoring the effectiveness of response-adapted strategies. This article sheds light on the forward landscape and rear-mirror view of biomarkers in myeloma.

Prospective study of signalling pathways in myeloma bone disease with regard to activity of the disease, extent of skeletal involvement and correlation to bone turnover markers

AIMS

The aim of our study was to address the utility of serum levels of selected parameters of myeloma bone disease (MBD) signalling with regard to the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM), activity, markers of bone turnover and extent of skeletal changes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed prospectively 77 individuals with monoclonal gammopathies - 46 patients with active MM (AMM), 12 patients with smouldering MM (SMM) and 19 individuals with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to determine the role of HGF, MIP-1α, Syndecan-1, osteoprotegerin, Activin A, DKK1, Annexin A2 and NF-κB.

RESULTS

We found significant differences of most of the parameters between MGUS and AMM, and with respect to the activity of MM assessed by International Staging System. Most of the parameters of MBD signalling correlated with traditional markers of bone turnover.

CONCLUSIONS

All the signalling pathways were activated in MM with more pronounced osteoclastogenesis in comparison with bone formation but not in MGUS regardless of its risk category, suggesting that MBD is not activated in MGUS until the process of transformation into MM. The parameters of MBD signalling might precede the increase of conventional parameters of bone turnover suggesting their possible role in early indication of anti-resorption therapy.

Increasing bone sclerosis during bortezomib therapy in multiple myeloma patients: results of a reduced-dose whole-body MDCT study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the frequency, location, extent, and patterns of bone sclerosis occurring in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) during bortezomib-based therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2003 through December 2011, 593 whole-body reduced-dose MDCT studies were performed of 79 consecutive patients receiving bortezomib. The median surveillance time was 21 months (range, 3-67 months). Baseline studies were compared with follow-up studies during therapy (follow-up 1), at the end of therapy (follow-up 2), and 12 months after cessation of bortezomib therapy (follow-up 3). We recorded any sclerotic change occurring inside or along the margins of the osteolytic lesions, in the cancellous bone, or inside preexistent medullary or extramedullary lesions. The time point of occurrence of bone sclerosis was correlated with the best hematologic response category.

RESULTS

Fourteen (17.7%) patients developed focal (n = 11) or diffuse (n = 3) bone sclerosis. The time window from bortezomib initiation to radiographic detection of bone sclerosis was 8 months (SD, 7 months). Sclerosis occurred at multiple sites (n = 7) or at an isolated site (n = 7). On subsequent whole-body reduced-dose MDCT studies, sclerosis further increased in seven (50%) patients. Hematologic best response during bortezomib treatment was complete response (n = 1), very good partial response (n = 2), partial response (n = 8), and stable disease (n = 3). Radiologic response at the time of sclerosis detection was partial response (n = 8), stable disease (n = 2), and progressive disease (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Bone remineralization may occur during bortezomib-based therapy for MM in a substantial proportion of patients. The extent, location, and patterns of sclerosis differ among patients and are unpredictable. Sclerosis was documented even in patients showing suboptimal hematologic response.

Validation of the Freiburg Comorbidity Index in 466 multiple myeloma patients and combination with the international staging system are highly predictive for outcome

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of MM patients vary considerably and depend on a variety of host- and disease-related risks. As yet, a comorbidity risk index in MM patients has neither been standardized nor validated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted an initial analysis in 127 MM patients and developed the FCI, validating it in an independent cohort of 466 MM patients. The FCI includes patients' Karnofsky Performance Status, renal and lung disease status. We compared the prognostic information of this validated FCI with established comorbidity indices (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index and Kaplan Feinstein), the International Staging System (ISS), MM therapy, and age.

RESULTS

Our validation confirmed that patients with 0, 1, or 2 to 3 FCI risk factors display significantly different overall survival (OS) of not reached, 86, and 39 months, respectively (P < .0001). Via multivariate analysis including the FCI, ISS, therapy, and age, the FCI retained its independent prognostic significance (P < .0015). The combination of the FCI and ISS allowed definition of 3 distinct subgroups with low-risk (FCI 0 and ISS I-II), intermediate-risk (all remaining), and high-risk (FCI 1-3 and ISS III) with OS probabilities at 5-years of 85%, 74%, and 42%, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our validation analysis demonstrated that the FCI remains a reliable comorbidity index, is simpler to generate than other available comorbidity scores, and contributes valuable information to the ISS. Their combination allows the definition of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. These results advocate use of the FCI in future prospective studies and might guide personalized treatment strategies.

Perspectives in the treatment of multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

The development of proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and advances in supportive care have considerably changed the treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma (MM) and significantly improved survival. Nevertheless, almost all patients show disease relapse and develop drug resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We review the prognostic stratification and therapeutic strategy for newly diagnosed MM patients. Furthermore, mechanisms of drug resistance are discussed. Data regarding newer drugs, currently undergoing examination, such as PI (carfilzomib, ONX0912, MLN9708, and marizomib), IMiDs (pomalidomide), histone deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat and panobinostat), kinase inhibitors (temsirolimus, everolimus, and tanespimycin), and immune-based therapies (elotuzumab, siltuximab, MOR03087, and MMBT062) are reported.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of three to four drug combination therapies including PI and IMiDs has significantly impacted on MM patient outcome. Moreover, new insights into MM biology from high-throughput technologies and availability of newer and more efficacious drugs will continue to influence our approach to MM treatment. In the immediate future molecular subgroup-specific trials using targeted agents may represent a very important step toward evaluating impact of interfering with relevant signaling pathways in MM. With the continued rapid evolution of progress in this field, MM will become a chronic illness having sustained complete response in a significant number of patients.

Emerging biological insights and novel treatment strategies in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Survival in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved significantly in the past 10 years due to new treatments, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (immunomodulatory drugs or IMiDs) bortezomib and advances in supportive care. Nevertheless, almost all MM patients show disease relapse and develop drug resistance.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the therapeutic approach for untreated MM patients. Furthermore, the prognostic stratification of patients and the proposed risk-adapted strategy are discussed. Finally, preclinical and clinical data regarding newer antimyeloma agents, currently undergoing examination such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs, carfilzomib), IMiDs (pomalidomide), epigenetic agents (histone deacetylase inhibitors vorinostat and panobinostat), humanized monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab and MOR03087) and targeted therapies (inhibitors of NF-κB, MAPK, HSP90 and AKT) are reported.

EXPERT OPINION

MM patient outcome has remarkably improved due to the use of three to four drug combination therapies including PIs and IMiDs, which target the tumor in its bone marrow microenvironment, however MM treatment remains challenging. The use of high-throughput techniques has allowed to discover new insights into MM biology. The identification of candidate therapeutic targets and availability of respective investigative agents will allow for a substantial progress in the development and implementation of personalized medicine in MM.

The novel, orally bioavailable HSP90 inhibitor NVP-HSP990 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and acts synergistically with melphalan by increased cleavage of caspases

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) binds and stabilizes numerous proteins and kinases essential for myeloma cell survival and proliferation. We and others have recently demonstrated that inhibition of HSP90 by small molecular mass inhibitors induces cell death in multiple myeloma (MM). However, some of the HSP90 inhibitors involved in early clinical trials have shown limited antitumor activity and unfavorable toxicity profiles. Here, we analyzed the effects of the novel, orally bioavailable HSP90 inhibitor NVP-HSP990 on MM cell proliferation and survival. The inhibitor led to a significant reduction in myeloma cell viability and induced G2 cell cycle arrest, degradation of caspase-8 and caspase-3, and induction of apoptosis. Inhibition of the HSP90 ATPase activity was accompanied by the degradation of MM phospho-Akt and phospho-ERK1/2 and upregulation of Hsp70. Exposure of MM cells to a combination of NVP-HSP990 and either melphalan or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors caused synergistic inhibition of viability, increased induction of apoptosis, and was able to overcome the primary resistance of the cell line RPMI-8226 to HSP90 inhibition. Combined incubation with melphalan and NVP-HSP990 led to synergistically increased cleavage of caspase-2, caspase-9, and caspase-3. These data demonstrate promising activity for NVP-HSP990 as single agent or combination treatment in MM and provide a rationale for clinical trials.

Targeting bone in myeloma

Myeloma bone disease (BD) not only impairs quality of life, but is also associated with impaired survival. Studies of the biology underlying BD support the notion that the increased osteoclastogenesis and suppressed osteoblastogenesis is both a consequence and a necessity for tumour growth and clonal expansion. Survival and expansion of the myeloma clone are dependent on its interactions with bone elements; thus, targeting these interactions should have anti-myeloma activities. Indeed, both experimental and clinical findings indicate that bone-targeted therapies, not only improve BD, but also create an inhospitable environment for myeloma cell growth and survival, favouring improved clinical outcome. This chapter summarizes recent progress in our understandings of the biology of myeloma BD, highlighting the role of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in this process and how they can be targeted therapeutically. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying myeloma-bone interactions will facilitate the development of novel therapeutic agents to treat BD, which as a consequence are likely to improve the clinical outcome of myeloma patients.

Bone disease in multiple myeloma and precursor disease: novel diagnostic approaches and implications on clinical management

The manifestations of bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) can have devastating clinical effects and increase mortality. Recent studies demonstrate that patients with the precursor conditions smoldering MM (SMM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) show evidence of bone disease and increased risk of fractures. The understanding of the pathogenesis of bone disease in MM has expanded in recent years. The traditional skeletal survey will probably be replaced by newer and more sensitive imaging techniques, which may have a prognostic impact and change our definition of MGUS and SMM. Bisphosphonates are recommended to prevent skeletal events in patients with MM, and have also been studied in SMM and MGUS. This article summarizes the current knowledge of bone disease in plasma cell disorders, and discusses the current standard and future role of novel imaging techniques, as well as the evidence and current guidelines for bisphosphonates in MM, SMM and MGUS.

A gene expression-based predictor for myeloma patients at high risk of developing bone disease on bisphosphonate treatment

PURPOSE

Myeloma bone disease impairs quality of life and is associated with impaired survival. Even with effective bisphosphonate treatment, a significant proportion of patients still develop skeletal-related events (SRE). Identifying such patients at presentation would allow treatment modification.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To investigate the molecular basis of bone disease at presentation and to develop a predictive signature for patients at high risk of developing SREs on bisphosphonates, 261 presenting myeloma samples were analyzed by global gene expression profiling. The derived "SRE gene signature" was complemented by the integration of associated clinical parameters to generate an optimal predictor.

RESULTS

Fifty genes were significantly associated with presenting bone disease, including the WNT signaling antagonist DKK1 and genes involved in growth factor signaling and apoptosis. Higher serum calcium level and the presence of bone disease and hyperdiploidy at presentation were associated with high risk of SRE development. A gene signature derived from the fourteen genes overexpressed in the SRE group was able to identify patients at high risk of developing an SRE on treatment. These genes either belonged to the IFN-induced family or were involved in cell signaling and mitosis. Multivariate logistic model selection yielded an optimal SRE predictor comprising seven genes and calcium level, which was validated as an effective predictor in a further set of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple expression-based SRE predictor can effectively identify individuals at high risk of developing bone disease while being on bisphosphonates. This predictor could assist with developing future trials on novel therapies aimed at reducing myeloma bone disease.

Targeting bone as a therapy for myeloma

Myeloma bone disease (BD) not only impairs quality of life, but is also associated with impaired survival. Studies of the biology underlying BD support the notion that the increased osteoclastogenesis and suppressed osteoblastogenesis, is both a consequence and a necessity for tumour growth and clonal expansion. Survival and expansion of the myeloma clone is dependent on its interactions with bone elements, thus targeting these interactions should have antimyeloma activities. Indeed both experimental and clinical findings indicate that bone-targeted therapies not only improve BD, but also create an inhospitable environment for myeloma cell growth and survival, favouring improved clinical outcome. This review summarizes recent progress in our understandings of the biology of myeloma BD, highlighting the role of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in this process and how they can be targeted therapeutically. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying myeloma-bone interactions will facilitate the development of novel therapeutic agents to treat BD, which as a consequence are likely to improve the clinical outcome of myeloma patients.

Consensus on the utility of bone markers in the malignant bone disease setting

Biochemical markers of bone turnover provide insight into ongoing rates of skeletal metabolism and tumor-bone interactions in patients with malignant bone disease. This article reviews the available recent evidence assessing the potential of bone markers for detecting and monitoring malignant bone lesions in patients with advanced cancers, and for assessing overall skeletal health and response to antiresorptive therapies in patients at all stages of cancer progression. Most data thus far are for urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) in predicting risks of skeletal morbidity and death and monitoring response to zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases. Ongoing studies are evaluating such correlations for other markers and therapies. Emerging evidence suggests that bone markers may help identify patients at high risk for bone metastasis or bone lesion progression, thereby allowing improved follow-up. Results from ongoing clinical trials evaluating such potential applications of bone markers are awaited.

Heparanase enhances local and systemic osteolysis in multiple myeloma by upregulating the expression and secretion of RANKL

Excessive bone destruction is a major cause of morbidity in myeloma patients. However, the biological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of myeloma-induced bone disease are not fully understood. Heparanase, an enzyme that cleaves the heparan sulfate chains of proteoglycans, is upregulated in a variety of human tumors, including multiple myeloma. We previously showed that heparanase promotes robust myeloma tumor growth and supports spontaneous metastasis of tumor cells to bone. In the present study, we show, for the first time, that the expression of heparanase by myeloma tumor cells remarkably enhances bone destruction locally within the tumor microenvironment. In addition, enhanced heparanase expression in the primary tumor also stimulated systemic osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis, thus mimicking the systemic osteoporosis often seen in myeloma patients. These effects occur, at least in part, as the result of a significant elevation in the expression and secretion of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) by heparanase-expressing myeloma cells. Moreover, analysis of bone marrow biopsies from myeloma patients reveals a positive correlation between the level of expression of heparanase and RANKL. Together, these discoveries reveal a novel and key role for heparanase in promoting tumor osteolysis and show that RANKL is central to the mechanism of heparanase-mediated osteolysis in myeloma.

Serum levels of total-RANKL in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) plays a key role in osteoclast activation in myeloma bone disease. The increased expression of RANKL in the bone marrow microenvironment was demonstrated in several studies, but there are only rare data on circulating RANKL levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the current study, we investigated the clinical significance of serum RANKL levels, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test that detects both free and osteoprotegerin (OPG)-bound RANKL (total-RANKL, tRANKL) in patients with newly diagnosed MM (n = 93) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS; n = 20) compared with healthy controls (n = 20).

RESULTS

Circulating serum tRANKL was significantly elevated in patients with MM compared with controls (P < .001) or MGUS (P < .001). Furthermore, tRANKL levels were higher in smoldering MM versus MGUS (P = .031) and in symptomatic versus smoldering MM (P < .001). Serum tRANKL increased parallel to International Staging System stages I to III (P = .004) and correlated with the presence of lytic bone lesions (P < .001). Total-RANKL was a prognostic factor for overall survival in symptomatic MM (P = .043). A significantly longer progression-free survival was observed in patients with a > 50% decrease in tRANKL levels after 3 months of combined chemotherapy and bisphosphonate treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates for the first time that serum tRANKL reflects advanced disease, lytic bone destruction, and poor prognosis in MM.

Multiple myeloma: changes in serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase can be used in daily practice to detect imminent osteolysis

Objective: Monitoring of bone disease in multiple myeloma is becoming increasingly important because bone-protecting treatment with bisphosphonate is becoming restricted after the awareness of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Despite the potential of biochemical markers of bone remodeling to monitor dynamic bone turnover, they are not used in everyday practice. Here, we investigate their usefulness to detect imminent progressive osteolysis in relapsing patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: In an unselected cohort of 93 patients, we measured the bone resorption markers C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX-I), C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type-I collagen generated by MMPs (ICTP), N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type-I collagen (NTX-I), and the bone formation marker bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) monthly for 2 yr. Retrospectively, we identified 40 cases where patients had progressive disease. We investigated how the bone markers developed prior to disease progression. Results: We observed that CTX-I and bALP changed significantly before progressive disease were recognized. More interestingly, these changes differed depending on whether concurrent progressive osteolysis was present. In patients with progressive osteolysis, there was a large increase in bone resorption which was not compensated by increased bone formation. In contrasts, patients with stable bone disease had only a slight increase in bone resorption which was compensated by concurrent increased bone formation. By calculating a patient-specific CTX-I/bALP ratio, we quantified the risk a patient experiences if the ratio increases. Conclusion: By analyzing patient-specific changes in the ratio of CTX-I/bALP, we might tailor treatment with bone-protecting agents in the individual patient.

Synergistic action of the novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 with histone deacetylase inhibitors, melphalan, or doxorubicin in multiple myeloma

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a promising target for tumor therapy. The novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 has preclinical activity in multiple myeloma, however, little is known about effective combination partners to design clinical studies. Multiple myeloma cell lines, OPM-2, RPMI-8226, U-266, LP-1, MM1.S, and primary myeloma cells were exposed to NVP-AUY922 and one of the combination partners histone deacetylase inhibitor NVP-LBH589, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), melphalan, or doxorubicin, either simultaneously or in sequential patterns. Effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis were determined. Synergistic effects were evaluated using the method of Chou and Talalay. Combined sequential incubation with NVP-AUY922 and SAHA showed that best synergistic effects were achieved with 24 h preincubation with SAHA followed by another 48 h of combination treatment. Combination of NVP-AUY922 with SAHA, NVP-LBH589, melphalan, or doxorubicin resulted in synergistic inhibition of viability, with strong synergy (combination index < 0.3) in the case of melphalan. Importantly, resistance of the RPMI-8226 cell line and relative resistance of some primary myeloma cells against NVP-AUY922 could be overcome by combination treatment. These data show impressive synergistic action of the novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 with melphalan, doxorubicin, NVP-LBH589, and SAHA in multiple myeloma and build the frame work for clinical trials.

Plasma cell myeloma

Plasma cell myeloma is a heterogenous disease with variable clinical presentation and outcome. The prognosis is largely determined by tumor biology. Newer therapeutic agents are rapidly changing the survival outlook of myeloma patients.

Myeloma bone disease: recent advances in biology, diagnosis, and treatment

Bone disease is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM). Occurring in the majority of MM patients, it is associated with bone pain, fractures, and hypercalcemia and has major impacts on quality of life. Furthermore, bone resorption activity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with symptomatic MM. Myeloma is characterized by a unique form of bone disease with lytic bone destruction that is not followed by reactive bone formation (uncoupling). This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the biology of osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition in MM, diagnostic standards, and recent progress in treatment options for myeloma bone disease. Translational research has enabled a rapid transfer of mechanistic insights from the bench to the bedside and will hopefully result in better treatment options and outcome for patients in near future.

How to treat elderly patients with multiple myeloma: combination of therapy or sequencing

Patients with multiple myeloma aged older than 65 years have traditionally received an oral regimen combining melphalan and prednisone (MP). The introduction of novel agents, such as immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, has substantially changed the treatment paradigm of this disease. Five randomized phase III studies, comparing MP plus thalidomide (MPT) versus MP, have shown that MPT increased time to progression (TTP); however, only two of these five studies showed improvement in overall survival (OS). One randomized study has shown that MP plus bortezomib (MPV) increases both TTP and OS compared with MP. Both MPT and MPV are now regarded as the new standards of care for elderly patients. Other promising results have been reported with MP plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, or the combination of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone. Reduced-intensity transplantation can be an option for some patients, especially when novel agents are incorporated into pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation. For patients aged older than 75 years a gentler approach should be used, and doses of standard MPT or MPV should be reduced. An accurate management of treatment-related adverse events with prompt dose-reduction can greatly reduce the rate of early discontinuation and significantly improve treatment efficacy. The choice of treatment should be tailored according to the patient’s biologic age and comorbidities, and the expected toxicity profile of the regimen.

Serum concentrations of DKK-1 decrease in patients with multiple myeloma responding to anti-myeloma treatment

Lytic bone destruction is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and is because of an uncoupling of bone remodeling. Secretion of Dickkopf (DKK)-1 by myeloma cells is a major factor which causes inhibition of osteoblast precursors. In this study, the effect of different treatment regimens for MM on serum DKK-1 was evaluated and correlated with the response to treatment in 101 myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, adriamycin and dexamethasone (AD) or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). At baseline, myeloma patients had increased serum DKK-1 as compared with patients with MGUS (mean 3786 pg/mL vs. 1993 pg/mL). There was no difference between previously untreated MM patients and patients at relapse. A significant decrease of DKK-1 after therapy was seen in the following groups: Bortezomib (4059 pg/mL vs. 1862 pg/mL, P = 0.016), lenalidomide (11837 pg/mL vs. 4374 pg/mL, P = 0.039), AD (1668 pg/mL vs. 1241 pg/mL, P = 0.016), and AD + HDCT + ASCT (2446 pg/mL vs. 1082 pg/mL, P = 0.001). Thalidomide led to a non-significant decrease in DKK-1 (1705 pg/mL vs. 1269 pg/mL, P = 0.081). Within all groups, a significant decrease of DKK-1 was only seen in responders (i.e. patients achieving complete remission or partial remission), but not in non-responders. We show for the first time that serum DKK-1 levels decrease in myeloma patients responding to treatment, irrespective of the regimen chosen. These data suggest that myeloma cells are the main source of circulating DKK-1 protein and provide a framework for clinical trials on anti-DKK-1 treatment in MM.

Multiple myeloma--an update on diagnosis and treatment

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell (PC) malignancy characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal PCs in the bone marrow and the production of large amounts of a monoclonal immunoglobulin or paraprotein. In the past years, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment were introduced aiming to identify high-risk patients who need proper anti-myeloma treatment. Intensive therapy including autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the new agents bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have improved patients' responses. Further optimalization of the different treatment schedules in well-defined patient groups may prolong their survival. Patient stratification is currently based on patient characteristics, extent of myeloma disease, and associated cytogenetic and laboratory anomalies. More and more gene expression studies are introduced to stratify patients and to individualize therapy.