Prediction of outcomes in patients with Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib after imatinib resistance/intolerance

The Levels of FoxO3a Predict the Failure of Imatinib Mesylate Therapy among Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

INTRODUCTION: Forkhead Transcription Factor 3a (FoxO3a) has been proposed to have a high efficacy to predict the failure of imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy among Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients. However, the limited evidence had made this marker remained controversy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the correlation between the levels of FoxO3a and the risk of treatment failure of IM therapy in CML patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out between February 2019 and February 2020 in Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang, Indonesia. All CML patients treated with IM on our hospital during the study period were included. The levels of FoxO3a was determined using the Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Cusabio Biotech Kit (Cusabio Biotech Co., New York, USA). The treatment response was assessed using the European Leukemia criteria. The correlation and effect estimate between the levels of FoxO3a and treatment response of CML patients was assessed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 53 CML patients receiving IM in our hospital were included, consisting of 29 patients with good response and 24 patients with non-response. Our study found that CML patients with lower levels of FoxO3a was associated with increased risk to develop treatment failure when treated with IM. Moreover, we also found that higher risk of treatment failure of IM therapy was also found in patients with increased levels of thrombocytes, basophils, and leukocytes, and lower levels of hemoglobin. CONCLUSION: We reveal that FoxO3a is the prominent marker to predict the treatment response of CML patients treated with IM.

Moderate anemia at diagnosis is an independent prognostic marker of the EUTOS, Sokal, and Hasford scores for survival and treatment response in chronic-phase, chronic myeloid leukemia patients with frontline imatinib

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of anemia for the diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) receiving imatinib.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four CML-CP patients were enrolled. The influences of moderate anemia with hemoglobin (Hb) < 10 g/dl, four scoring systems, and the early molecular response at 3 months (BCR-ABL ≤10%; 3M-EMR) on the achievement of a deep molecular response (DMR, MR4.5), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

Moderate anemia was identified in 44 (28.6%) patients. These patients had more aggressive baseline features and higher risks, as assessed by scoring systems, and less favorable treatment responses vs those without anemia, including 3M-EMR (50.0% vs 69.1%), a complete cytogenetic response at 6 months (20.5% vs 50.9%), and a major molecular response at 12 months (22.5% vs 45.2%), with a median follow-up of 54.0 months. Furthermore, an Hb of 10 g/dl better distinguished DMR, EFS, PFS, and OS than the EUTOS, Sokal, and Hasford scores, and better predicted the responses and survivals in combination with 3M-EMR than 3M-EMR alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding highlights the significance of anemia in CML-CP, and suggests that patients with anemia at diagnosis should be carefully monitored and might benefit from more potent TKIs if not achieving 3M-EMR.

Specific Monoclonal Antibody Against Bcr/Abl Out-of-Frame Alternative Proteins as Diagnostic Tool in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients

More recently, alternative splicing of specific genes are investigated for their therapeutic potential. In particular, we reported the existence of BCR-ABL alternative splicing isoforms, in about 80% of Philadelphia-positive patients, which lead to the expression of aberrant proteins. These fusion proteins are characterized by an orphan initial and correct Bcr portion attached to a 112 amino acid sequence, arising from the impairment in the reading frame (reading of ABL exon 4 and 5). We demonstrated that these Abl-out-of-frame (OOF) isoforms could have an immunological role with therapeutic implications. The aim of this study was to characterize a new monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for Abl-OOF protein portion, for diagnostic use, to detect this biomarker in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients and to generate novel approaches in the immunotherapy. 5F11G11 MAb recognizes the OOF protein portion of the native full-length Bcr/Abl-OOF protein expressed in cells transiently transfected, as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. In addition, we demonstrate the MAb's ability to recognize the alternative hybrid Bcr/Abl fusion protein expressed in leukemic cells from CML patients, to support the possible use of 5F11G11 MAb as a diagnostic tool to select patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML that could be eligible for an immunotherapeutic approach with this new antigen.

Treating the chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patient: which TKI, when to switch and when to stop?

INTRODUCTION

With the discovery of imatinib mesylate nearly 20 years ago, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were found to be effective in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). TKI therapy has since revolutionized the treatment of CML and has served as a paradigm of success for targeted drug therapy in cancer. Several new TKIs for CML have been approved over the last two decades that exhibit improved potency over imatinib and have different off-target profiles, providing options for individualized therapy selection. Areas covered: Current management of chronic phase CML, including guidance on the sequential use of imatinib and newer-generation TKIs and evolving treatment strategies such as TKI discontinuation. Relevant literature was identified by searching biomedical databases (i.e. PubMed) for primary research material. Expert commentary: Although survival outcomes have drastically improved for CML patients, treatment for CML has grown more complex with the introduction of next-generation TKIs and the advent of treatment-free remissions (TFR). Goals of therapy have shifted accordingly, with increased focus on improving quality of life, managing patient expectations and optimizing patient adherence.

Cost-effectiveness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Strategies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase After Generic Entry of Imatinib in the United States

Background:

We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of treating incident chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with generic imatinib when it becomes available in United States in 2016. In the year following generic entry, imatinib’s price is expected to drop 70% to 90%. We hypothesized that initiating treatment with generic imatinib in these patients and then switching to the other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), dasatinib or nilotinib, because of intolerance or lack of effectiveness (“imatinib-first”) would be cost-effective compared with the current standard of care: “physicians’ choice” of initiating treatment with any one of the three TKIs.

Methods:

We constructed Markov models to compare the five-year cost-effectiveness of imatinib-first vs physician’s choice from a US commercial payer perspective, assuming 3% annual discounting ($US 2013). The models’ clinical endpoint was five-year overall survival taken from a systematic review of clinical trial results. Per-person spending on incident CML-CP treatment overall care components was estimated using Truven’s MarketScan claims data. The main outcome of the models was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We interpreted outcomes based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A panel of European LeukemiaNet experts oversaw the study’s conduct.

Results:

Both strategies met the threshold. Imatinib-first ($277 401, 3.87 QALYs) offered patients a 0.10 decrement in QALYs at a savings of $88 343 over five years to payers compared with physician’s choice ($365 744, 3.97 QALYs). The imatinib-first incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was approximately $883 730/QALY. The results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion:

When imatinib loses patent protection and its price declines, its use will be the cost-effective initial treatment strategy for CML-CP.

New alternative splicing BCR/ABL-OOF shows an oncogenic role by lack of inhibition of BCR GTPase activity and an increased of persistence of Rac activation in chronic myeloid leukemia

In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 80% of patients present alternative splice variants involving BCR exons 1, 13 or 14 and ABL exon 4, with a consequent impairment in the reading frame of the ABL gene. Therefore BCR/ABL fusion proteins (BCR/ABL-OOF) are characterized by an in-frame BCR portion followed by an amino acids sequence arising from the out of frame (OOF) reading of the ABL gene. The product of this new transcript contains the characteristic BCR domains while lacking the COOH-terminal Rho GTPase GAP domain. The present work aims to characterize the protein functionality in terms of cytoskeleton (re-)modelling, adhesion and activation of canonical oncogenic signalling pathways. Here, we show that BCR/ABL-OOF has a peculiar endosomal localization which affects EGF receptor activation and turnover. Moreover, we demonstrate that BCR/ABL-OOF expression leads to aberrant cellular adhesion due to the activation of Rac GTPase, increase in cellular proliferation, migration and survival. When overexpressed in a BCR/ABL positive cell line, BCR/ABL-OOF induces hyperactivation of Rac signaling axis offering a therapeutic window for Rac-targeted therapy. Our data support a critical role of BCR/ABL-OOF in leukemogenesis and identify a subset of patients that may benefit from Rac-targeted therapies.

Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when administered concomitantly to healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Bosutinib is an orally bioavailable dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a CYP3A4 enzyme substrate. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of bosutinib when coadministered with the CYP3A4 inducer rifampin in 24 healthy men.

METHODS

Subjects received single oral doses of bosutinib 500 mg (Days 1 and 14) and once-daily oral doses of rifampin 600 mg (Days 8-17); serial blood samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

Bosutinib exposures were reduced following concomitant administration of rifampin vs. bosutinib alone, measured by peak plasma concentration (C(max); 112 vs. 16.0 ng/mL; 86% reduction), total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; 2740 vs. 207 ng·h/mL; 92% reduction), and AUC to the last measurable concentration at time T (2440 vs. 158 ng·h/mL; 94% reduction). Median time to C(max) and mean half-life were shorter for bosutinib plus rifampin vs. single-agent bosutinib. Oral clearance increased approximately 13-fold; the volume of distribution increased from 9560 to 72,900 L. Treatment-emergent adverse events appeared less frequently with bosutinib plus rifampin (59%) vs. single-agent bosutinib (79%); diarrhea was reported in 11 (46%) vs. 4 (18%) subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of potent or moderate CYP3A inducers with bosutinib should be avoided because of the effects of drug-drug interaction observed between bosutinib and rifampin.

Factors influencing long-term efficacy and tolerability of bosutinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia resistant or intolerant to imatinib

The dual SRC/ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor bosutinib is indicated for adults with Ph+ chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. This analysis of an ongoing phase 1/2 study (NCT00261846) assessed effects of baseline patient characteristics on long‐term efficacy and safety of bosutinib 500 mg/day in adults with imatinib (IM)‐resistant (IM‐R; n = 196)/IM‐intolerant (IM‐I; n = 90) chronic phase (CP) CML. Median treatment duration was 24·8 months (median follow‐up, 43·6 months). Cumulative major cytogenetic response (MCyR) rate [95% confidence interval (CI)], was 59% (53–65%); Kaplan‐Meier (KM) probability of maintaining MCyR at 4 years was 75% (66–81%). Cumulative incidence of on‐treatment progression/death at 4 years was 19% (95% CI, 15–24%); KM 2‐year overall survival was 91% (87–94%). Significant baseline predictors of both MCyR and complete cytogenetic response (newly attained/maintained from baseline) at 3 and 6 months included prior IM cytogenetic response, baseline MCyR, prior interferon therapy and <6 months duration from diagnosis to IM treatment initiation and no interferon treatment before IM. The most common adverse event (AE) was diarrhoea (86%). Baseline bosutinib‐sensitive BCR‐ABL1 mutation was the only significant predictor of grade 3/4 diarrhoea; no significant predictors were identified for liver‐related AEs. Bosutinib demonstrates durable efficacy and manageable toxicity in IM‐R/IM‐I CP‐CML patients.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia

In less than 10 years, the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukaemia has changed from that of a fatal disease to a disorder amenable simply to lifelong oral medication and compatible with a normal lifespan. This change has been made possible by a deep understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and a determination to develop targeted and selective drugs. This Seminar summarises the presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis and monitoring technology, treatment options, side-effects, and outcomes of chronic myeloid leukaemia, and discusses the possibility of cure-ie, stable undetectable or low level disease in the absence of medication. Chronic myeloid leukaemia continues to instruct us in the mechanisms of leukaemogenesis and provides hope not only for similar developments in management of other malignancies, but also for the remarkable speed with which these can move from bench to bedside.

Use of second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: an evolving treatment paradigm

Although imatinib remains the gold standard for first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), increasing recognition of imatinib resistance and intolerance has led to the development of additional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which have demonstrated effectiveness as salvage therapies or alternative first-line treatments. Although additional options represent progress, the availability of 3 second-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib) and 1 third-generation TKI (ponatinib) has added complexity to the treatment paradigm for CML, particularly CML in the chronic phase. Two second-generation agents (dasatinib and nilotinib) are approved for use as first-line and subsequent therapy. Thus, the appropriate sequencing of TKIs is a frequent quandary, and is incompletely addressed in clinical guidelines. Here, we review studies that might guide selection of a second- or third-generation TKI after failure of TKI therapy in patients with chronic-phase CML. These studies evaluate prognostic factors such as first-line cytogenetic response and BCR-ABL1 mutation status, which might help physicians identify patients who are likely to respond to second-generation TKIs, and those for whom ponatinib or an investigational agent might be more appropriate. We summarize evidence to date that suggests that use of a second-generation TKI as third-line therapy confers limited value in most CML patients, and we also explore the utility of current event-free survival versus traditional outcomes to predict long-term benefits of sequential TKI use. Finally, we present 3 case studies to illustrate how prognostic factors and other considerations (eg, tolerability) can be used to individualize subsequent therapy in cases of TKI resistance or intolerance.

Overcoming therapy failure in elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

SUMMARY 

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) affects mainly older adults, as median age at diagnosis is 60–65 years. For a long time, survival of elderly CML patients has been shorter compared with younger patients. With the advent of the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, long-term outcome has significantly improved, including in the elderly, with rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses roughly equal to those attained in the young, as well as manageable toxicity. More recently, second-generation (dasatinib, nilotinib and bosutinib) and third-generation (ponatinib) TKIs were employed in CML patients failing imatinib or other front-line treatments. Despite a shorter follow-up, these TKIs showed remarkable activity in elderly patients. This review focuses on the therapeutic strategies to prevent and overcome treatment failure in elderly CML patients.

Definition and treatment of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has many facets. The causes of resistance include low patient compliance, low plasma or intracellular drug concentration, BCR-ABL1 mutations, and clonal chromosome abnormalities in Ph+ cells, but in at least 50% of patients the causes are currently unknown. Primary resistance occurs when a predefined response level is not achieved within a prespecified period of time. Not achieving a complete hematologic response (CHR) within 3 months, not achieving a partial cytogenetic response and/or a BCR-ABL1 transcripts level ≤10% (international standard) within 6 months, and not achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and/or a BCR-ABL1 transcripts level <1% within 12 months, define primary resistance. Secondary resistance is defined by a loss of CHR, or CCyR, or major molecular response. Resistance to imatinib calls without exceptions for a second-generation TKI. In case of resistance to two TKIs, an allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be considered.

MDR1 expression predicts outcome of Ph+ chronic phase CML patients on second-line nilotinib therapy after imatinib failure

In the face of competing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), identification of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients expecting favorable response to second-line treatment is warranted. At the time of imatinib resistance, the investigation of multidrug-resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and BCR-ABL yielded the following results: (i) Patients with high MDR1 transcript levels showed superior response at 48 months as compared with low-level MDR1 patients: major molecular response (MMR) in 41% vs 16% (P=0.014), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 58% vs 39% (P=0.044), and progression-free survival (PFS) in 67% vs 46% (P=0.032). (ii) Patients with BCR-ABL(IS) <28% achieved higher MMR rates (48% vs 21%, P=0.009). (iii) PFS at 48 months was associated with in vitro resistance of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations: 63% (no mutation) vs 61% (sensitive, intermediately sensitive or unknown IC50 (median inhibitory concentration)) vs 23% (resistant, P=0.01). (iv) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at positions 1236 and 2677 were associated with higher MDR1 expression in comparison to wild type. (v) Nilotinib was able to impede proliferation of MDR1-overexpressing imatinib-resistant cells. High MDR1 gene expression might identify patients whose mode of imatinib resistance is essentially determined by increased efflux activity of MDR1 and therefore can be overcome by second-line nilotinib treatment.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013

Advances in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, particularly regarding tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mandate regular updating of concepts and management. A European LeukemiaNet expert panel reviewed prior and new studies to update recommendations made in 2009. We recommend as initial treatment imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib. Response is assessed with standardized real quantitative polymerase chain reaction and/or cytogenetics at 3, 6, and 12 months. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤10% at 3 months, <1% at 6 months, and ≤0.1% from 12 months onward define optimal response, whereas >10% at 6 months and >1% from 12 months onward define failure, mandating a change in treatment. Similarly, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) at 3 months and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from 6 months onward define optimal response, whereas no CyR (Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+] >95%) at 3 months, less than PCyR at 6 months, and less than CCyR from 12 months onward define failure. Between optimal and failure, there is an intermediate warning zone requiring more frequent monitoring. Similar definitions are provided for response to second-line therapy. Specific recommendations are made for patients in the accelerated and blastic phases, and for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Optimal responders should continue therapy indefinitely, with careful surveillance, or they can be enrolled in controlled studies of treatment discontinuation once a deeper molecular response is achieved.

Which TKI? An embarrassment of riches for chronic myeloid leukemia patients

With the approval in many countries of nilotinib and dasatinib for frontline therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, clinicians now have to make a difficult choice. Because none of the 3 available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown a clear survival advantage, they all represent reasonable choices. However, in individual patients, the case may be stronger for a particular TKI. In the younger patient, in whom the prospect of eventually achieving treatment-free remission is likely to be of great importance, dasatinib or nilotinib may be preferred, although their advantage over imatinib in this setting remains to be proven. In patients with a higher risk of transformation (which is currently based on prognostic scoring), the more potent TKIs may be preferred because they appear to be more effective at reducing the risk of transformation to BC. However, imatinib still represents an excellent choice for many chronic myeloid leukemia patients. All of these considerations need to be made in the context of the patient's comorbidities, which may lead to one or more TKIs being ruled out of contention. Whatever first choice of TKI is made, treatment failure or intolerance must be recognized early because a prompt switch to another TKI likely provides the best chance of achieving optimal response.