Novel prognostic markers revealed by a proteomic approach separating benign from malignant insulinomas

[Search for new immunohistochemical and circulating markers of insulinoma]

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma is a neuroendocrine tumor, the main manifestation of which is hypoglycemia. However, the symptoms of hypoglycemia can be non-specific for a long time, especially outside provocative conditions, and quite often the tumor manifests from a life-threatening condition - hypoglycemic coma. In this regard, timely laboratory diagnosis of insulinoma and determination of its aggressive course is one of the priorities in modern researches.

AIM

Search for new immunohistochemical (IHC) and circulating markers (CM) of insulinoma, including its aggressive course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients examined at the Endocrinology Research Centre in the period 2017-2022 and operated on for an insulin-producing tumor were included. Before surgery and 2-12 months after it, blood sampling was performed with the determination of targeted marker proteins. Some patients underwent an extended IHC examination of the tumor, surrounding tissue and islets of Langerhans with primary antibodies to target marker proteins with an assessment of the degree of their expression. To determine the aggressive course of the tumor, the degree of malignancy (Grade), the number of tumors and signs of recurrence were characterized.

RESULTS

Based on the analysis of literature and pathogenetic characteristics of insulinoma, the following candidates for targeted marker proteins were selected: cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART), chromogranin B (CrB), neuroendocrine secretory protein 55 (NESP55), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1), arylalkylamine-N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT), melatonin, and, exclusively for IHC research, protein D52 (TPD52), as well as receptors for glucagon-like peptide-1 (rGLP1) and melatonin (MTNR1b). 41 patients were included in the study, of which 10 patients underwent an extended IHC study. In patients with both aggressive and non-aggressive insulinoma after surgical treatment, CM levels did not change significantly and in individual patients they could both increase and decrease, including those patients with the expression of the corresponding marker in tumor tissue. It was shown that CART was expressed only in the tumor (in 4/10 of cases), while MTNR1b and rGLP1 were expressed in the tumor (in 6/10 and 10/10, respectively) and the islets of Langerhans (in 5/9 and 9/9, respectively). The association of marker expression with the aggressiveness of the course of insulinoma has not been revealed.

CONCLUSION

The markers CART, MTNR1b and rGLP1 are of primary interest for further study in a larger sample of patients with insulinoma. Other markers (TPD52, XgB, NESP55, melatonin, AA-NAT) have not been shown to be associated with an insulin-producing tumor, therefore they are not promising for future researches. At the same time, it is necessary to continue research aimed at finding new both circulating and IHC markers in order to early diagnose the manifestation of the disease and its recurrence, and more accurately determine the malignant and proliferative potential of the tumor.

Canine insulinoma as a model for human malignant insulinoma research: Novel perspectives for translational clinical studies

Insulinomas are considered rare indolent neuroendocrine neoplasms in human medicine, however when metastases occur no curative treatment is available thus, novel therapies are needed. Recently advances have been made in unraveling the pathophysiology of malignant insulinoma still major challenges hinder the development of a functional model to study them. Canine malignant insulinoma have similar recurrence and a poor prognosis as human malignant insulinoma. Additionally, both human and canine patients share extensively the same environment, tend to develop insulinoma seemingly spontaneously with an etiological role for hormones, at a similar incidence and stage of lifespan, with metastasis commonly to liver and regional lymph nodes, which are unresponsive to current therapies. However, the occurrence of metastases in dogs is as high as 95% compared with only 5-16% in human studies. From a comparative oncology perspective, the shared features with human insulinoma but higher incidence of metastasis in canine insulinoma suggests the latter as a model for human malignant insulinomas. With the common purpose of increasing survival rates of human and veterinary patients, in this review we are going to compare and analyze clinical, pathological and molecular aspects of canine and human insulinomas to evaluate the suitability of the canine model for future translational clinical studies.

Progesteron receptor expression in insulin producing cells of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Progesterone receptor (PgR) inhibits cell proliferation in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN). In non-neoplastic pancreas, loss of PgR induces β-cell proliferation and insulin production. However, detailed association between PgR and insulin producing PanNENs is poorly understood. Insulin, proinsulin, and PgR were immunolocalized in 82 PanNENs (54 non-functioning PanNENs: NF-PanNENs and 28 insulinomas). The status of immunoreactivity was compared to the clinicopathological factors of the patients. Immunoreactivity was also confirmed by employing the double-immunohistochemistry. These results were also compared with those in non-neoplastic Langerhans islets. PgR immunoreactivity was significantly higher in insulinomas than that in NF-PanNENs (p < 0.001). Insulin and proinsulin immunoreactivity was also detected in 20 (37 %) of (single cell) insulin positive NFs (Ins^pos-NF-PanNEN), in which PgR expression was higher than in insulin negative NF-PanNENs (Ins^neg-NF-PanNEN, p = 0.03). The ratio of PgR-insulin double positive cells to overall insulin positive cells, as well as PgR-proinsulin double positive cells to proinsulin positive cells, was detected to the same degree in insulinoma (PgR-insulin 70 %, PgR-proinsulin 66 %), Ins^pos-NF-PanNENs (PgR-insulin 65 %, PgR-proinsulin 68 %) and normal islet (PgR-insulin 80 %, PgR-proinsulin 72 %). PgR and insulin expressing cells colocalize in tumor cells of the PanNENs regardless of the hormone-related symptoms of the patients. Inhibitory effect of PgR on tumor cells might be associated with the favourable clinical outcome of insulinoma patients.

Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres and Differential Expression of Endocrine Transcription Factors Distinguish Metastatic and Non-metastatic Insulinomas

Insulin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs)/insulinomas are generally considered to be indolent tumors with an excellent prognosis after complete resection. However, some insulinomas have a poor prognosis due to relapses and metastatic disease. Recently, studies in non-functional PanNETs indicated that behavior can be stratified according to alpha- and beta-cell differentiation, as defined by expression of the transcription factors ARX and PDX1, respectively. It is unknown whether similar mechanisms play a role in insulinomas. Therefore, we determined ARX and PDX1 expression in a cohort of 35 sporadic primary insulinomas and two liver metastases of inoperable primary insulinomas. In addition, WHO grade and loss of ATRX or DAXX were determined by immunohistochemistry, and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) and CDKN2A status by fluorescence in situ hybridization. These findings were correlated with tumor characteristics and clinical follow-up data. In total, five out of 37 insulinoma patients developed metastatic disease. Metastatic insulinomas were all larger than 3 cm, whereas the indolent insulinomas were smaller (p value < 0.05). All three primary insulinomas that metastasized showed ARX expression, 2/3 showed ALT, and 1/3 had a homozygous deletion of CDKN2A as opposed to absence of ARX expression, ALT, or CDKN2A deletions in the 32 non-metastatic cases. The two liver metastases also showed ARX expression and ALT (2/2). The presence of ARX expression, which is usually absent in beta-cells, and genetic alterations not seen in indolent insulinomas strongly suggest a distinct tumorigenic mechanism in malignant insulinomas, with similarities to non-functional PanNETs. These observations may inform future follow-up strategies after insulinoma surgery.

The functioning side of the pancreas: a review on insulinomas

PURPOSE

Insulinomas are a rare type of neuroendocrine tumors, originating in the pancreas, difficult to diagnose and to treat. Due to its rarity, insulinomas are a not well-known pathological entity; thus, the diagnostic process is frequently a medical challenge with many possible differential diagnoses. The diagnostic process varies between non-invasive procedures, such as the fasting test or imaging techniques, and invasive ones. Insulinomas are rarely malignant, but the glycemic imbalance correlated with this tumor can frequently alter the quality of life of the patients and the consequent hypoglycemia can be extremely dangerous. Moreover, insulinomas can be associated with different genetic syndromes, such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 1, accompanied by other specific symptoms. There are many different treatment strategies, depending on the need to control symptoms or control diseases progression, the only curative one being surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the evidences present in the literature on insulinomas and reported its main clinical characteristics and management strategies.

CONCLUSION

The aim of this review of the literature is to present the current knowledge on insulinomas, exploring the main clinical characteristics, the diagnostic tools, and the therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

A novel liver metastasis-correlated protein of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) discovered by proteomic analysis

The aim of this study was to identify novel liver metastasis-correlated proteins of PanNEN by proteomics to compare pancreatic tumor (PT) with paired metastatic liver tumor (LT). Of 118 surgical cases with PanNEN, 7 cases with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of both PT and paired LT were evaluated by proteomics. Tumor cells were selectively collected from FFPE tissues by laser capture microdissection. A total of 3,722 proteins were detected from extracted peptides by mass spectrometry-based shotgun analysis. Selection of the candidate proteins expressed differently between PT and LT were performed by semi-quantitative comparison in silico and confirmation with immunohistochemistry. We focused on ANXA6, CNPY2, RAB11B and TUBB3, all of which had higher expressions in LT. In all surgical cases with FFPE samples, liver recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in correlation to the expression of the candidate proteins in PT by immunohistochemistry. Liver RFS was significantly poorer in CNPY2 positive patients than in negative patients (10-year liver RFS; 39.8% vs. 92.3%, p = 0.012). Also, liver RFS tended to be poorer in ANXA6 positive patients than in those who were negative (10-year liver RFS; 51.4% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.099). In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of liver RFS were CNPY2 positivity (HR: 6.19, 95 % CI: 1.47-42.79, p = 0.011) and tumor size ≥ 42 mm (HR: 4.63, 95 % CI: 1.03-23.23, p = 0.045). In conclusion, CNPY2 is a novel liver metastasis-correlated protein of PanNEN.

A meta-analysis of Prognostic factor of Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are a group of clinically rare and heterogeneous diseases of the pancreas. However, the prognostic factors for this disease in patients still remain controversial. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the predictive roles of those prognostic factors for pNENs. All related articles published until Sep 17, 2017 were identified via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid and the Cochrane Library. Studies that examined the prognostic factors of pNENs were enrolled. 17 articles (2822 patients) were finally included in this study. The pooled data suggested that patients with positive surgical resection margin and lymph node, advanced G stage and TMN stage, organ metastasis, vascular invasion and the necrosis of specimens had a decreased overall survival for pNENs. Similarly, patients with functional tumors might have a poor prognosis. However, age, gender, surgical type and size of tumor could not be regarded as prognostic factors for pNENs. Our analytic data demonstrated that surgical resection margin, G stage, TMN stage, lymph node, metastasis, vascular invasion and the necrosis could be prognostic factors for pNENs. Our study may assist doctors to screen patients with different prognosis more efficiently during follow-up and select appropriate treatment measures.

Insulinoma: A retrospective study analyzing the differences between benign and malignant tumors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic tumor and, usually, a benign disease but can be a malignant one and, sometimes, a highly aggressive disease. The aim of this study was to determine differences between benign and malignant tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 103 patients with insulinoma treated in a tertiary center. It was analyzed demographic, clinical, laboratory, localization and histologic analysis of tumor and follow up data of subjects in order to identify differences between individuals benign and malignant disease.

RESULTS

Almost all patients (87%) had a benign tumor and survival rates of 100% following pancreatic tumor surgery. Those with malignant tumors (13%) have a poor prognosis, 77% insulinoma-related deaths over a period of 1-300 months after the diagnosis with a survival rate of 24% in five years. The following factors are associated with an increased risk of malignant disease: duration of symptoms < 24 months, fasting time for the occurrence of hypoglycemia < 8 h, blood plasma insulin concentration ≥ 28 μU/mL and C-peptide ≥ 4.0 ng/mL at the glycemic nadir and tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data help to base the literature about these tumors, reinforcing that although insulinoma is usually a single benign and surgically treated neoplasia, the malignant one is difficult to treat. We highlight the data that help predict a malignancy behavior of tumor and suggest a long follow up after diagnosis in these cases.

Tumor protein D52 (isoform 3) contributes to prostate cancer cell growth via targeting nuclear factor-κB transactivation in LNCaP cells

Our previous study showed that TPD52 overexpression could increase migration and proliferation of LNCaP cells contributing to the development of prostate cancer. However, mechanism of TPD52 in prostate cancer initiation and progression remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the possible underlying mechanism of TPD52 in prostate cancer progression. In LNCaP cells, TPD52 expression was altered by transfecting with either EGFP-TPD52 or specific short hairpin RNA. Overexpression of TPD52 protected LNCaP cells from apoptosis through elevated anti-apoptotic proteins XIAP, Bcl-2, and Cyclin D1, whereas Bax was downregulated. Mechanistically, we found that TPD52 confers transactivation of nuclear factor-κB, thereby enhancing its target gene expression in LNCaP cells. TPD52 promotes LNCaP cell invasion probably via increased matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression and its activity while tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase expression is significantly downregulated. Notably, TPD52 might be involved in cell adhesion, promoting tumor metastasis by inducing loss of E-cadherin, expression of vimentin and vascular cell adhesion molecule, and additionally activation of focal adhesion kinase. Furthermore, TPD52 directly interacts with nuclear factor-κB p65 (RelA) and promotes accumulation of phosphorylated nuclear factor-κB (p65)^S536 that is directly linked with nuclear factor-κB transactivation. Indeed, depletion of TPD52 or inhibition of nuclear factor-κB in TPD52-positive cells inhibited secretion of tumor-related cytokines and contributes to the activation of STAT3, nuclear factor-κB, and Akt. Interestingly, in TPD52 overexpressing LNCaP cells, nuclear factor-κB inhibition prevented the autocrine/paracrine activation of STAT3. TPD52 activates STAT3 through ascertaining a cross talk between the nuclear factor-κB and the STAT3 signaling systems. Collectively, these results reveal mechanism by which TPD52 is associated with prostate cancer progression and highlight the approach for therapeutic targeting of TPD52 in prostate cancer.

Prognostic relevance of UCH-L1 and α-internexin in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Prognostic biomarkers for the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are needed. Proteomic study on insulinoma has been rarely reported. We identified the differential expression of proteins between insulinoma and their paired tissues by proteomic analysis, and evaluated the prognostic significance of specific proteins in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors including insulinoma. The differential expression of select proteins was validated in more than 300 tumors using immunohistochemical staining and western blot. Methylation of UCH-L1 promoter in tumors was examined by methylation specific PCR and validated by sequencing. The concurrent expression of UCH-L1 and α-internexin was correlated with the prognosis in 2 independent collectives of patients with tumors. Sixty-two and 219 proteins were significantly down-regulated and up-regulated in insulinomas, respectively. Demethylation of UCH-L1 promoter was associated with UCH-L1 expression in tumors (p = 0.002). The concurrent expression of UCH-L1 and α-internexin in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors was significantly associated with better overall survival and disease-free survival in the combination of both cohorts (log rank p = 3.90 × 10⁻⁴ and p = 3.75 × 10⁻⁵, respectively) and in each of cohorts. The prognostic value of both proteins was also validated in patients with stage II and III tumors (p = 0.017 and p = 0.006, respectively). The proteins UCH-L1 and α-internexin could be independent prognostic biomarkers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Translational research in neuroendocrine tumors: pitfalls and opportunities

Interest in research on neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has grown in the past 10 years, coinciding with improvements in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of NETs. In addition, NETs have become one of the most exciting settings for drug development. Two targeted agents for the management of advanced pancreatic NETs have been approved, but the development of targeted agents for NETs is limited by problems with both patient selection and demonstration of activity. In this review, we analyze these limitations and discuss ways to increase the predictive value of preclinical models for target discovery and drug development. The role of translational research and 'omics' methodologies is emphasized, with the final aim of developing personalized medicine. Because NETs usually grow slowly and metastatic tumors are found at easily accessible locations, and owing to improvements in techniques for liquid biopsies, NETs provide a unique opportunity to obtain tumor samples at all stages of the evolution of the disease and to adapt treatment to changes in tumor biology. Combining clinical and translational research is essential to achieve progress in the NET field. Slow growth and genetic stability limit and challenge both the availability and further development of preclinical models of NETs, one of the most crucial unmet research needs in the field. Finally, we suggest some useful approaches for improving clinical drug development for NETs: moving from classical RECIST-based response end points to survival parameters; searching for different criteria to define response rates (for example, antiangiogenic effects and metabolic responses); implementing randomized phase II studies to avoid single-arm phase II studies that produce limited data on drug efficacy; and using predictive biomarkers for patient selection.

Novel biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma can arise from endometriosis; however, it is distinct from other types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in terms of its clinicopathological and molecular features. Cancer antigen 125 lacks the sensitivity and specificity required for accurate clinical diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma. Therefore, the aim of the current review was to identify novel biomarker candidates for the immunohistochemical and serological diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma. A search of the relevant English language literature published between 1966 and 2014 was conducted using the PubMed MEDLINE online database. High-throughput tissue microarray technology and proteomic screening combined with mass spectrometry may provide additional information regarding diagnostic biomarker candidates for ovarian clear cell carcinoma. The present review summarizes the characteristics of potential genomic alterations that activate cancer signaling pathways and, thus, contribute to carcinogenesis. The major signaling pathways activated in clear cell carcinoma are associated with cell cycle regulation (hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 and tumor protein D52), growth factor signaling (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1; KiSS-1 metastasis-suppressor; erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2; and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2), anti-apoptosis and survival pathways [sialidase 3 (membrane sialidase)], metabolism (γ-glutamyltransferase 1), chemoresistance (napsin A aspartic peptidase, glutathione peroxidase 3; and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1), coagulation [coagulation factor III (thromboplastin, tissue factor); and tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2], signaling (lectin, galactoside-binding and soluble, 3), and adhesion and the extracellular matrix [cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin (epithelial); versican; and laminin, α 5]. The present review of the relevant literature may provide a basis for additional clinical investigation of the ovarian clear cell carcinoma serum biomarker candidate proteins identified herein.