Positive immunohistochemical staining of KIT in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas is not associated with KIT/PDGFRA mutations

A narrative review on rare types of pancreatic cancer: should they be treated as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas?

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest malignancies in humans and it is expected to play a bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents 85% of all primary pancreatic malignancies. Recently, much attention has been given to PDAC, with significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms underpinning disease initiation and progression, along with noticeable improvements in overall survival in both localized and metastatic settings. However, given their rarity, rare histological subtypes of pancreatic cancer have been underappreciated and are frequently treated as PDAC, even though they might present non-overlapping molecular alterations and clinical behavior. While some of these rare histological subtypes are true variants of PDAC that should be treated likewise, others represent separate clinicopathological entities, warranting a different therapeutic approach. In this review, we highlight clinical, pathological, and molecular aspects of rare histological types of pancreatic cancer, along with the currently available data to guide treatment decisions.

Malignant Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: An Orthogonal Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) are generally indolent; however, some patients present with "malignant" SPN. An orthogonal analysis of multiple datasets was performed to investigate the utility of complete surgical resection (CSR) for malignant SPN.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for cases of malignant SPN, defined as T4, N1, and/or M1. Malignant SPN was analyzed within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and compared with T1-3N0M0 SPN. Predictors of malignant SPN were assessed, and treatments were analyzed by using survival analysis.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded 164 cases of malignant SPN. Of 31 children, only one died due to malignant SPN. Among adults, CSR was associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (P = 0.0002). Chemotherapy did not improve malignant SPN DSS, whether resected (P = 0.8485) or not (P = 0.2219). Of 692 adults with SPN within the NCDB, 93 (13.4%) had malignant SPN. Pancreatic head location (odds ratio [OR] 2.174; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.136-4.166; P = 0.0186) and tumor size (OR 1.154; 95% CI 1.079-1.235; P < 0.0001) associated with the malignant phenotype. Malignant SPN predicted decreased overall survival (OS) compared with T1-3N0M0 disease (P < 0.0001). Resected malignant SPN demonstrated improved OS (P < 0.0001), including resected stage IV malignant SPN (P = 0.0003). Chemotherapy did not improve OS for malignant SPN, whether resected (P = 0.8633) or not (P = 0.5734). Within a multivariable model, resection was associated with decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.090; 95% CI 0.030-0.261; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 13% of patients with SPN present with a malignant phenotype. Pediatric cases may be less aggressive. Resection may improve survival for malignant SPN, which does not appear chemosensitive.

[Rare pancreatic tumors]

Beyond pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is by far the most frequent pancreatic neoplasm, a great variety of tumors occur in the pancreas. They include solid and cystic masses and epithelial and nonepithelial neoplasms, and they show a great diversity in their biological behavior, ranging from benign tumors to highly aggressive neoplasms. As examples of rare pancreatic tumors, clinical, morphological, and molecular aspects of acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and serous cystic neoplasms are presented and discussed.

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: Key Pathologic and Genetic Features

CONTEXT.—

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas is a low-grade malignant tumor generally associated with a good prognosis. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms show peculiar morphologic features, but sometimes the differential diagnosis with other pancreatic neoplasms (ie, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors) can be a challenging task, especially in cytologic or biopsy specimens. In these cases immunohistochemistry is a useful tool, but the diagnostic utility of several proposed immunohistochemical markers is questionable. In recent years, despite several attempts to characterize the pathogenetic, molecular, and prognostic features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, they still remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE.—

To give the reader a comprehensive update on this entity.

DATA SOURCES.—

The PubMed database (US National Library of Medicine) was searched using the following string: pseudopapillary tumor [AND/OR] neoplasm [AND/OR] pancreas. All articles written in English were included. In addition, because a heterogeneous terminology has been used in the past to define solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, the reference lists of each paper selected in the PubMed database were also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review gives a comprehensive update on the pathologic, clinical, and molecular features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, particularly addressing issues and challenges related to diagnosis. In addition, we have tried to correlate the molecular alterations with the morphologic and clinical features.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Clinicopathological features and pathological staging

The nomenclature and classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved in the last 15 years based on the advances in knowledge of the genomics, clinical behaviour and response to therapies. The current 2019 World Health Organization classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms categorises them into three groups; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs)(grade 1 grade 2, grade 3), pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) based on the mitotic rate, Ki-67 index, morphological differentiation and/or co-existing tissue subtype. PanNETs are also classified into non-functional NET, insulinoma, gastrinoma, VIPoma, glucagonoma, somatostatinoma, ACTH-producing NET and serotonin producing NET based on hormone production and clinical manifestations. A portion of the cases were associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN 1), neurofibromatosis and Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. In view of the distinctive pathology and clinical behaviour of PanNENs, the current 8th AJCC/UICC staging system has separated prognostic staging grouping for PanNETs from the pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas or MiNENs. Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas and MiNENs are staged according to the prognostic stage grouping for exocrine pancreatic carcinoma. The new stage grouping of PanNETs was validated to have survival curves separated between different prognostic groups. This refined histological and staging would lead to appropriate selections of treatment strategies for the patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Malignant epithelial/exocrine tumors of the pancreas

Pancreatic malignant exocrine tumors represent the most important cause of cancer-related death for pancreatic neoplasms. The most common tumor type in this category is represented by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), an ill defined, stroma-rich, scirrhous neoplasm with glandular differentiation. Here we present the relevant characteristics of the most important PDAC variants, namely adenosquamous carcinoma, colloid carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells, signet ring carcinoma, medullary carcinoma and hepatoid carcinoma. The other categories of malignant exocrine tumors, characterized by fleshy, stroma-poor, circumscribed neoplasms, include acinar cell carcinoma (pure and mixed), pancreatoblastoma, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. The most important macroscopic, histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular hallmarks of all these tumors, highlighting their key diagnostic/pathological features are presented. Lastly, standardized indications regarding gross sampling and how to compile a formal pathology report for pancreatic malignant exocrine tumors will be provided.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas: Two case reports

RATIONALE

About 8384 cases of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) of pancreas have been published in English literature, from 1933 to 2018. This is a low-grade tumor that usually occurs in children but is rare in adults and, in exceptional cases, can show extrapancreatic localization. In this paper we present 2 unusual cases of SPNs, 1 with retroperitoneal location (case 1) and 1 that was firstly diagnosed as a G1 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and showed hepatic metastases after 13 years (case 2).

PATIENT CONCERNS

No symptoms in first case. The tumor was incidentally diagnosed, during ultrasound examination. In the second case, the metastasis was observed during regular follow-up.

DIAGNOSES

The diagnosis was established based on the histological features and immunohistochemical profile that showed positivity for vimentin, nuclear β-catenin, cyclin D1, CD10, and SRY-related high-mobility group box 11 and negativity for maspin.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical excision, in both cases.

OUTCOMES

No recurrences in first case, at 5 months after diagnosis. Hepatic metastases in the second case, at 13 years after diagnosis, with portal invasion after another 15 months.

LESSONS

Without a complex immunoprofile, SPN can be misdiagnosed as NET. SPN can be a low-grade tumor but long-time follow-up is mandatory to detect delayed metastases. A correct diagnosis is necessary for a proper therapeutic management.

LEF1, TFE3, and AR are putative diagnostic markers of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms

The diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) is challenging because some SPNs share many similar morphological and immunohistochemical features with other pancreatic neoplasms. In this study, we investigated potential diagnostic markers of SPN.

Based on the SPN-specific upregulated genes from a previous DNA microarray and proteome study, we selected six immunohistochemical markers [beta-catenin, androgen receptor (AR), lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3), fused in sarcoma (FUS), and WNT inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1)]. We also evaluated the Ki-67 proliferative index to investigate its associations with prognosis. To validate these markers, we studied 91 SPNs as well as 51 pancreatic ductal carcinomas (PDC) and 48 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) as controls.

We found frequent and diffuse nuclear expressions of β-catenin (98.9%), AR (81.3%), LEF1 (93.4%), TFE3 (74.7%), FUS (84.6%), and cytoplasmic expression of WIF-1 (96.7%) in SPNs. In contrast, PDCs and NETs showed no expression. (P < 0.001). When beta-catenin, LEF1, and TFE3 staining were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 91.9%, respectively. Four (4.4%) SPNs showed distant metastasis and these tumors were associated with a relatively high Ki-67 proliferative index (≥ 5%; P = 0.013).

We identified LEF1, TFE3, and AR as putative diagnostic markers of SPN, auxiliary to β-catenin. Incorporated into an immunohistochemical panel, these markers could be beneficial to distinguish SPN from PDC and NET. In addition, we suggest that the Ki-67 proliferative index can be a predictive marker of metastasis in SPNs.

Practical Immunohistochemistry in Neoplastic Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas

CONTEXT

- Immunomarkers with diagnostic, therapeutic, or prognostic values have been increasingly used to maximize the benefits of clinical management of patients with neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas.

OBJECTIVES

- To review the characteristics of immunomarkers that are commonly used in surgical pathology practice for neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas, and to summarize the clinical usefulness of immunomarkers that have been discovered in recent years in these fields.

DATA SOURCES

- Data sources include literature review, authors' research data, and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

- Immunohistochemistry is an indispensable tool for the accurate diagnosis of neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Useful immunomarkers are available to help distinguish malignant neoplasms from benign conditions, determine organ origins, and subclassify neoplasms that are morphologically and biologically heterogeneous. Specific immunomarkers are also available to help guide patient treatment and assess disease aggressiveness, which are keys to the success of personalized medicine. Pathologists will continue to play a critical role in the discovery, validation, and application of new biomarkers, which will ultimately improve patient care.

Utility of immunohistochemistry in the pancreatobiliary tract

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become a useful ancillary study in the identification and classification of pancreatic neoplasms. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved because of the continuous discoveries of tumor-associated biomarkers and the development of effective immunohistochemical panels.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and classify pancreatic neoplasms by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS

To better guide therapeutic decisions and predict the prognostic outcome, it is crucial to make an accurate diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm. Application of appropriate immunohistochemical panels enables pathologists to differentiate pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas from reactive conditions and to identify rare types of pancreatic neoplasms. Knowing the utilities and pitfalls of each tumor-associated biomarker is essential to avoiding a potential diagnostic error because an absolutely cancer-specific biomarker does not exist. This article reviews frequently used tumor-associated biomarkers, provides lists of effective immunohistochemical panels, and recommends a diagnostic algorithm as a standard approach to pancreatic neoplasms.

Diagnosis and molecular aspects of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is an uncommon low-grade malignant neoplasm occurring mostly in young women. In addition to its distinctive pathological appearance of pseudopapillae with poorly cohesive neoplastic cells, rare variants exist raising the differential diagnosis especially with neuroendocrine neoplasms. The overall prognosis for patients with SPNs is excellent after surgical resection. Nevertheless, 10% of cases may have malignant behavior characterized by tumor recurrence and/or metastasis. Despite numerous studies, the histogenesis of this neoplasm remains unclear. Distinctive molecular alterations such as the presence of CTNNB1 mutations are observed in nearly all cases, while mutations classically observed in ductal adenocarcinoma, such as KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4, are not observed in SPNs, reinforcing its distinct nature compared to all other pancreatic neoplasms. Recent transcriptional studies have shown that activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in these tumors is associated with the upregulation of genes belonging to Notch, Hedgehog, and androgen receptor signaling pathways.

Characterization of gene expression and activated signaling pathways in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm is an uncommon pancreatic tumor with distinct clinicopathologic features. Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms are characterized by mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1. However, little is known about the gene and microRNA expression profiles of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms. Thus, we sought to characterize solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm-specific gene expression and identify the signaling pathways activated in these tumors. Comparisons of gene expression in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm to pancreatic ductal carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, and non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues identified solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm-specific mRNA and microRNA profiles. By analyzing 1686 (1119 upregulated and 567 downregulated) genes differentially expressed in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, we found that the Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, and androgen receptor signaling pathways, as well as genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition, are activated in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms. We validated these results experimentally by assessing the expression of β-catenin, WIF-1, GLI2, androgen receptor, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers with western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Our analysis also revealed 17 microRNAs, especially the miR-200 family and miR-192/215, closely associated with the upregulated genes associated with the three pathways activated in solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Our results provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm tumorigenesis and its characteristic less epithelial cell differentiation than the other common pancreatic tumors.

Telocytes in the interstitium of human exocrine pancreas: ultrastructural evidence

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic interstitial cells are located among acini, ducts, nerves, and blood vessels. They are essential for pancreas development, physiology, and for oncogenic microenvironment. We identified cells with characteristic ultrastructural features of telocytes in pancreatic interstitium. Telocytes were initially described as interstitial Cajal-like cells, but it gradually became clear that they were a distinct novel cell type not directly related to canonical interstitial Cajal cells.

METHODS

Serial ultrathin sections of human pancreatic tissue were studied by transmission electron microscopy. Computer analysis software was used to obtain 2-dimensional compositions from serial micrographs and to perform morphometry.

RESULTS

Pancreatic telocytes appear as small-body cells with prolongations called telopodes. The ultrastructural features of telopodes are the following: (a) number: 1 to 3; (b) length: tens of micrometers; (c) moniliform aspect: with podoms (thicker portions) and podomers (thin segments, with a mean width of 60 nm, undetectable by light microscopy); (d) dichotomous branching forming a network; (e) establish homocellular and heterocellular junctions; (f) release of microvesicles/multivesicular bodies. Telopodes pass close to blood vessels, nerves, and pancreatic acinar cells and ducts.

CONCLUSIONS

Telocytes are present as distinct interstitial cells in the exocrine pancreatic stroma. They act as important players in intercellular signaling via stromal synapses and shed vesicle transfer.

Expression of L1CAM, COX-2, EGFR, c-KIT and Her2/neu in anaplastic pancreatic cancer: putative therapeutic targets?

AIMS

Undifferentiated (anaplastic) pancreatic cancer and undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (giant cell tumour) are rare variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Representing biologically highly aggressive neoplasms, they are frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. The response to established chemo- or radiochemotherapeutic treatment regimens is poor, and undifferentiated pancreatic cancer generally has a dismal prognosis. As additional therapeutic options have not yet been investigated in undifferentiated pancreatic cancer, the aim was to analyse the expression of putative therapeutic targets that have shown promising results in various other neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifteen cases of undifferentiated pancreatic cancer (seven containing osteoclast-like giant cells) were investigated clinicopathologically and immunohistochemically for putative therapeutic targets. Whereas L1CAM, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were found to be significantly expressed in 80%, 93% and 87% of the investigated tumours, respectively, there was no substantial expression of c-kit (CD117) and there was no detectable expression of Her2/neu.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of L1CAM, COX-2 and EGFR in the majority of undifferentiated pancreatic carcinomas suggests that they might represent targets for adjuvant therapy in anaplastic pancreatic cancer. On the other hand, c-kit and Her2/neu seem to have no relevance for the therapy of these tumours.

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm: a pancreatic enigma

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas is a relatively uncommon tumor. It typically affects young women, has nonspecific clinical and radiologic manifestations, and can be readily diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and histopathologic evaluation. Histologic features characteristically show loosely cohesive, relatively uniform polygonal cells surrounding delicate capillary-sized blood vessels. Other features include cytoplasmic vacuolization, finely stippled chromatin, nuclear grooving, eosinophilic hyaline globules, and degenerative changes. Almost all solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms harbor mutations in the beta-catenin gene. They stain with beta-catenin, CD10, and focally with neuroendocrine markers. Although previously considered benign, this tumor is currently considered a low-grade malignant epithelial neoplasm with low metastatic rate and high overall survival. Most patients are cured by complete surgical excision. Despite the characterization of the morphologic and molecular features of this enigmatic neoplasm, more work is needed to uncover its cell of origin and true histogenesis.

Pancreatic cysts: pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications

CONTEXT

Cystic lesions of the pancreas are being recognized with increasing frequency and have become a more common finding in clinical practice because of the widespread use of advanced imaging modalities and the sharp drop in the mortality rate of pancreatic surgery. Consequently, in the past 2 decades, the nature of many cystic tumors in this organ has been better characterized, and significant developments have taken place in the classification and in our understanding of pancreatic cystic lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the current concepts in classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical/biologic behavior of pancreatic cystic tumors.

DATA SOURCES

The authors' personal experience, based on institutional and consultation materials, combined with an analysis of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to solid tumors, most of which are invasive ductal adenocarcinomas with dismal prognosis, cystic lesions of the pancreas are often either benign or low-grade indolent neoplasia. However, those that are mucinous, namely, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms, constitute an important category because they have well-established malignant potential, representing an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Those that are nonmucinous such as serous tumors, congenital cysts, lymphoepithelial cysts, and squamoid cyst of pancreatic ducts have no malignant potential. Only rare nonmucinous cystic tumors that occur as a result of degenerative/necrotic changes in otherwise solid neoplasia, such as cystic ductal adenocarcinomas, cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasia, and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, are also malignant and have variable degrees of aggressiveness.

Aggressive behaviour of solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in adults: a case report and review of the literature

Solid-pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a rare neoplasm of the pancreas that usually occurs in young females. It is generally considered a low-grade malignant tumor that can remain asymptomatic for several years. The occurrence of infiltrating varieties of SPT is around 10%-15%. Between 1986 and 2006, 282 cystic tumors of the pancreas were observed. Among them a SPT was diagnosed in 8 patients (2.8%) with only one infiltrating variety. This was diagnosed in a 49-year-old female 13 years after the sonographic evidence of a small pancreatic cystic lesion interpreted as a pseudocyst. The tumor invaded a long segment of the portal-mesenteric vein confluence, and was removed with a total pancreatectomy, resection of the portal vein and reconstruction with the internal jugular vein. Histological examination confirmed the R-0 resection of the primary SPT, although a vascular invasion was demonstrated. The postoperative course was uneventful, but 32 mo after surgery the patient experienced diffuse liver metastases. Chemotherapy with different drugs was started. The patient is alive and symptom-free, with stable disease, 75 mo after surgery. Twenty-five patients with invasion of the portal vein and/or of mesenteric vessels were retrieved from the literature, 16 recent patients with tumor relapse after potentially curative resection were also retrieved. The best treatment remains a radical resection whenever possible, even in locally advanced or metastatic disease. The role of chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, is still to be defined.

Silent mutations in KIT and PDGFRA and coexpression of receptors with SCF and PDGFA in Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for tyrosine kinase-based tumorigenesis

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive form of skin cancer of neuroendocrine origin. Its treatment involves wide excision and radiotherapy but no effective therapy exists for advanced disease. Upregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases, PDGFRA and KIT, has a crucial role in cancer development. Several studies have shown expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT (CD117) in Merkel cell carcinoma. In this study, we examined the expression and mutational status of KIT and PDGFRA in 14 primary and 18 metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. The expression of KIT and PDGFRA and their respective ligands, stem cell factor (SCF) and PDGFA, was assessed by immunohistochemistry. In addition, we analyzed KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, and PDGFRA exons 10, 12 and 18 for the presence of activating mutations. We found that only 53% of cases of Merkel cell carcinoma expressed KIT, which was mostly seen as diffuse weak staining, and SCF expression was observed only in 31% of cases. In contrast, 87 and 81% of cases expressed PDGFRA and PDGFA, respectively. We observed coexpression of SCF and KIT in only 5 of 32 cases (16%) whereas 25 of 31 cases (81%) showed coexpression of PDGFRA and its ligand PDGFA. While we documented silent mutations in exon 17 of KIT and exons 10, 12 and 18 of PDGFRA, we were not able to identify any known activating mutations. Our results indicate that there is no correlation between positive immunostaining and occurrence of activating mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. Moreover, the presence of KIT/SCF and PDGFRA/PDGFA coexpression in a proportion of cases may indicate an autocrine/paracrine stimulation loop. We think therefore that imatinib mesylate is less likely to be an effective therapy for Merkel cell carcinoma, unless activating mutations exist in other exons of these receptor kinases.

Myocardial interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) and their nanostructural relationships with intercalated discs: shed vesicles as intermediates

Intercalated discs (ID) are complex junctional units that connect cardiac myocytes mechanically and electrochemically. However, there is limited information concerning the cardiomyocyte interaction with interstitial non-muscle cells. Our previous studies showed that myocardial interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) are located in between cardiomyocytes, blood capillaries and nerve fibres. Typically, ICLC have several very long, moniliform, cytoplasmic processes which establish closed contacts with nerve fibres, as well as each other. We report here ultrastructural evidence concerning the relationships of ICLC processes with ID. The ICLC cytoplasmic prolongations (tens micrometers length) preferentially pass by or stop nearby the ID. Transmission electron microscopy emphasized three distinct connecting features between the tips of ICLC extensions and myocytes at the ‘mouth’ of ID: free or budding shed vesicles, exocytotic multi-vesicular bodies and direct contacts. In the last case, electron-dense repetitive nanostructures (‘pillars’) (35–40 nm high and 100–150 nm wide, similar to adhesion molecules) fasten the ICLC to the myocytes. All these features suggest a juxtacrine and/or paracrine intercellular mutual modulation of ICLC and cardiomyocytes in the microenvironment of ID, possibly monitoring the cardiac functions, particularly the electrical activity.

CD117/KIT expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

CD117/KIT overexpression is common in neoplasms such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors and predicts clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis, and therefore, targeted molecular therapy may be beneficial. Marked differences in the incidence of CD117/KIT expression have been reported in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that CD117/KIT expression is unusual in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

CD117/KIT immunohistochemistry was performed on 23 archival pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples using 2 primary antibodies.

RESULTS

Satisfactory internal and external positive control labeling was achieved for both primary antibodies. No tumor cell labeling was identified using one primary antibody, whereas all cases showed cytoplasmic CD117/KIT staining with the second. However, CD117/KIT expression was also identified using the latter within nuclei and benign pancreatic epithelium, suggesting that artifactual staining was occurring.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma does not express CD117/KIT as assessed using the primary immunohistochemical antibody usually used in our laboratory for CD117/KIT detection. The variation in reported incidence of CD117/KIT expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is because of methodological differences in immunohistochemical technique. Ideally, immunohistochemical studies of this molecule should be combined with mutational status testing of the c-kit gene.

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a review of salient clinical and pathologic features

Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas is a rare tumor of uncertain histogenesis characterized, as the name suggests, by a cystic and solid pattern of growth with formation of pseudopapillae. Accounting for only a small percentage of pancreatic neoplasms, SPT occurs primarily in young women, although cases in older patients and men have been reported. The tumor is thought to have low-grade malignant potential, as the majority of the cases are cured by simple but complete surgical resection. Knowledge of the unique morphologic and demographic characteristics of this neoplasm is essential for accurate diagnosis. Herein, we review the clinical and pathologic features, which can help separate SPTs from other primary pancreatic tumors.

Trials of new germ cell immunohistochemical stains in 93 extragonadal and metastatic germ cell tumors

Organic cation transporter 3/4 (OCT3/4) is a transcription factor of embryonic stem cells; c-kit (CD117) is a tyrosine kinase receptor implicated in seminoma carcinogenesis. Their reactivity is well characterized in testicular, but not extragonadal and metastatic, germ cell tumors. A total of 93 germ cell tumors (41 seminoma, 22 embryonal carcinoma, 18 teratoma, and 12 yolk sac tumor) were obtained from the central nervous system (30), mediastinum (23), retroperitoneum/abdomen (31), and other locations (9). Immunohistochemical staining for c-kit, placental-like alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), OCT3/4, and new markers D2-40 and AP-2gamma was performed on seminomas; CD30 and epithelial membrane antigen were added for nonseminomas. In embryonal carcinoma, c-kit reacted in 17 of 22 cases, OCT3/4 in 18 of 22, and PLAP in 13 of 22. OCT3/4 was superior to PLAP in intensity and percent cells staining. In seminoma, OCT3/4 and D2-40 were superior to PLAP in intensity and percent cells; c-kit and AP-2gamma were superior in percent cells. D2-40 stained 23 of 24 seminomas strongly but had only weak focal reactivity in 6 of 17 embryonal carcinomas. Sensitivity and specificity were high for OCT3/4 discriminating seminoma and embryonal carcinoma, and c-kit discriminating seminoma, from other germ cell tumors. For embryonal carcinoma, OCT3/4 had higher specificity (0.94) than CD30 (0.786) owing to CD30 reactivity in 3 of 10 teratomas. Epithelial membrane antigen discriminated teratoma from other nonseminomas with a sensitivity of 1 but reacted occasionally in embryonal carcinoma (3/15) and yolk sac tumor (2/7). In conclusion, for extragonadal seminoma, OCT3/4, AP-2gamma, D2-40, and c-kit were equivalently superior to PLAP. For embryonal carcinoma, OCT3/4 was superior to PLAP and more specific than CD30. D2-40 is recommended to discriminate between seminoma and embryonal carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical analysis of nestin and c-kit and their significance in pancreatic tumors

The purpose of the present study was to clarify the difference of expression of two stem cell markers, nestin and c-kit, among various pancreatic epithelial tumors and evaluate their utility. Immunohistochemistry was done for 99 surgically resected pancreatic tumor specimens, including 20 ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC), two undifferentiated carcinomas (UC), 31 intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), six mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), five serous cystadenomas (SCA), six acinar cell carcinomas, two pancreatoblastoma (PB), eight solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN), and 19 endocrine neoplasms (EN). Nestin was widely expressed in four SPN, one PB, one SCA, sarcoma areas in two UC, one MCN, and one DAC, and an area of oncocytic component in one IPMN. Some of these SPN, SCA and sarcomatous or oncocytic components in which nestin was expressed, also coexpressed c-kit. Additionally, partial (scattered) expression of c-kit was observed in ductal elements of 16 DAC, eight IPMN, five MCN, and one UC, one SCA, and three EN. The eight c-kit-positive IPMN included four of 23 adenoma-to-border lesions and four of eight non-invasive-to-invasive carcinomas. The three EN were all carcinomas. These indicate that expression of two stem cell markers is different by tumor type, but the utility of judging direction or degree of differentiation and malignant grade on the basis of their expression status is suggested.

Cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas

The increasing use of radiological imaging has led to greater detection of small and asymptomatic cystic lesions of the pancreas. Most are resectable, but not all are neoplastic. This review provides an update on the histopathology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology, pathogenesis and management of cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. These include the serous, the mucinous cystic, the intraductal papillary mucinous and the solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Recently reported variants are described and very rare cystic variants of other pancreatic epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms are briefly mentioned.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas show an interruption of the Wnt-signaling pathway and express gene products of 11q

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas almost consistently show a beta-catenin mutation activating the Wnt-signaling pathway, resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1, but not in overt malignancy of this tumor. Besides cyclin D1, a set of markers (ie FLI-1, CD56 and progesterone receptor), whose genes map to chromosome 11q, are frequently expressed in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Chromosome 11q is a region that is also often affected in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This immunohistochemical study was undertaken to gain insights into the downstream regulation of the Wnt-signaling pathway and the significance of overexpressed gene products belonging to chromosome 11q for the tumorigenesis in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Fourteen solid pseudopapillary neoplasms were analyzed for the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21, p27, p16 and hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRb) proteins. In an extended series of 93 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, beta-catenin, cyclin D1, FLI-1 and CD56 expression was examined and compared with that in 22 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (98%) showed aberrant expression of beta-catenin with a concomitant cyclin D1 expression in 69% of the cases, but no expression of pRb (0%) was found. p27 and p21 were expressed in 100% (14/14) and 86% (12/14) of the cases, but only 2/14 (14%) were positive for p16. FLI-1 was expressed in 63% of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, but only in 1/22 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (5%), cyclin D1 expression was present in 14% of the latter. We conclude that in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms the activated Wnt-signaling pathway is disrupted, and that p21 and p27 are contributing to this fact by blocking of the hyperphosphorylation of the Rb protein, thus causing the very low proliferation rate characterizing the solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. The accumulation of high expression of proteins whose genes are located on chromosome 11q is characteristic of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, but not of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Cystic lesions of the pancreas

Although cystic tumors of the pancreas are relatively rare, they constitute an increasingly important category. Advances in imaging and interventional techniques and the sharp drop in the mortality rate of pancreatic surgery have rendered pancreatic biopsies and resections commonplace specimens. Consequently, in the past two decades, the nature of many cystic tumors in this organ has been better characterized. The names of some existing entities were revised; for example, what was known as papillary-cystic tumor is now regarded as solid-pseudopapillary tumor. New entities, in particular, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and its variants, such as oncocytic and intestinal subtypes were recognized. The importance of clinical and pathologic correlation in the evaluation of these lesions was appreciated, in particular, with regards to the multifocality of these lesions, their association with invasive carcinomas, and thus their 'preinvasive' nature. Consensus criteria for the distinction of these from the ordinary precursors of adenocarcinoma, the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, were established. The definition of mucinous cystic neoplasms was refined; ovarian-like stroma has now become almost a requirement for the diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasia, and defined as such, the propensity of these tumors to occur in perimenopausal women became even more striking. The validity and clinical value of classifying the pancreatic cysts of mucinous type as adenoma, borderline, CIS and invasive have been established. Related to this, the importance of thorough sampling in accurate classification of these mucinous lesions was recognized. Greater accessibility of the pancreas afforded by improved invasive as well as noninvasive modalities has also increased the detection of otherwise clinically silent cystic tumors, which has led to the recognition of more innocuous entities such as acinar cell cystadenoma and squamoid cyst of pancreatic ducts. As the significance of the cystic lesions emerged, cystic forms of otherwise typically solid tumors were also better characterized. Thus, significant developments have taken place in the classification and our understanding of pancreatic cystic tumors in the past few years, and experience with these lesions is likely to grow exponentially in the coming years.