Suspected community-acquired pneumonia in an ambulatory setting (CAPA): a French prospective observational cohort study in general practice

Meta-analysis of Calibration, Discrimination, and Stratum-Specific Likelihood Ratios for the CRB-65 Score

BACKGROUND

The CRB-65 score is recommended as a decision support tool to help identify patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who can safely be treated as outpatients.

OBJECTIVE

To perform an updated meta-analysis of the accuracy, discrimination, and calibration of the CRB-65 score using a novel approach to calculation of stratum-specific likelihood ratios.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of accuracy, discrimination, and calibration.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Google, previous systematic reviews, and reference lists of included studies. Data was abstracted and quality assessed in parallel by two investigators. The quality assessment used an adaptation of the TRIPOD and PROBAST criteria. Measures of discrimination, calibration, and stratum-specific likelihood ratios are reported.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies met our inclusion criteria and provided usable data. Most studies were set in Europe, none in North America, and 12 were judged to be at low risk of bias. The pooled estimate of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.77) for all studies. Calibration was good although there was significant heterogeneity; the pooled estimate of the ratio of observed to expected mortality for all studies was 1.04 (95% CI 0.91-1.19). The corresponding values for studies at low risk of bias where patients could be treated as outpatients or inpatients were 0.76 (0.70-0.81) and 0.88 (0.69-1.13). Summary estimates of stratum-specific likelihood ratios for all studies were 0.19 for the low-risk group, 1.1 for the moderate-risk group, and 4.5 for the high-risk group, and 0.13, 1.3, and 5.6 for studies at low risk of bias where patients could be treated as outpatients or inpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRB-65 is useful for identifying low-risk patients for outpatient therapy. Given a 4% overall mortality risk, patients classified as low risk by the CRB-65 had an outpatient mortality risk of no more than 0.5%.

Risks Related to the Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult and Pediatric Patients

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to alleviate symptoms during community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), while neither clinical data nor guidelines encourage this use. Experimental data suggest that NSAIDs impair neutrophil intrinsic functions, their recruitment to the inflammatory site, and the resolution of inflammatory processes after acute pulmonary bacterial challenge. During CAP, numerous observational data collected in hospitalized children, hospitalized adults, and adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) support a strong association between pre-hospital NSAID exposure and a delayed hospital referral, a delayed administration of antibiotic therapy, and the occurrence of pleuropulmonary complications, even in the only study that has accounted for a protopathic bias. Other endpoints have been described including a longer duration of antibiotic therapy and a greater hospital length of stay. In all adult series, patients exposed to NSAIDs were younger and had fewer comorbidities. The mechanisms by which NSAID use would entail a complicated course in pneumonia still remain uncertain. The temporal hypothesis and the immunological hypothesis are the two main emerging hypotheses. Current data strongly support an association between NSAID intake during the outpatient treatment of CAP and a complicated course. This should encourage experts and scientific societies to strongly advise against the use of NSAIDs in the management of lower respiratory tract infections.

[Risks associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pneumonia]

INTRODUCTION

Outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is frequent, although this is not based on clinical recommendations and there is no scientific evidence supporting better symptom relief in comparison to acetaminophen.

STATE OF THE ART

Experimental data suggest that NSAIDs alter the intrinsic functions of neutrophils, limit their locoregional recruitment, alter bacterial clearance and delay the resolution of inflammatory processes during acute bacterial pulmonary challenge. In hospitalized children and adults with CAP, observational data suggest a strong and independent association between the outpatient exposure to NSAIDs and the occurrence of pleuropulmonary complications (pleural empyema, excavation, and abscess). In the only study taking into account possible protopathic bias, the association still persists. Other markers of morbidity have been described, including delay in hospital management, prolonged antibiotic therapy, and higher transfer rate to an intensive care unit.

PERSPECTIVES

Data describing the role of self-medication and the biological mechanisms involved are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intake of NSAIDs during outpatient treatment of CAP is probably the second modifiable factor of morbidity after inadequate antibiotic therapy. In light of existing data in children and adults, health authorities should urgently reassess the risk-benefit ratio of NSAIDS in CAP.

CAPECO: Cost evaluation of community acquired pneumonia managed in primary care

BACKGROUND

Estimating the economic burden of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) managed in ambulatory setting is needed in France since no data are available.

METHOD

A retrospective study (CAPECO) was conducted based on a prospective French study describing patients with suspected CAP managed in primary care (CAPA). The aim of the CAPECO study was to estimate and explain medical costs of a disease episode in CAP patients only followed in ambulatory care and in hospitalised patients. Primary endpoints were the direct medical costs, impact on productivity and costs of incident CAP over one year. Secondary endpoint was to describe predictive factors of costs, hospital admission and stay length.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 886 patients, resulting in an incidence of CAP of 400 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, the mean direct medical cost of a disease episode of CAP was € 118.8 for strictly ambulatory patients with an equal weight for medical time, drugs, diagnostic procedures and tests. This direct cost was € 102.1 before admission for patients who were finally hospitalised. The mean cost of hospital admissions was € 3522.9. Main predictive factors of hospital admission and stay length were respectively a history of chronic respiratory disease and older age. Factors of direct medical cost were prescribing X-ray examination and having a positive X-ray. The impact of a disease episode on productivity was € 1980 (sd 1400) per ambulatory episode and € 5425 (sd 4760) per episode leading to hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Costs per ambulatory episode were modest but increased substantially in hospitalised patients, who were more numerous when chronic respiratory disorders were present and in the elderly. Indirect costs were significant. Deciders should thus consider both direct and indirect costs when assessing preventive interventions in the context of this disease.