GERD: A challenge to our view of reflux oesophagitis pathogenesis

Untangling immune cell contributions in the progression from GERD to Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer: Insights from genetic causal analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a rapidly increasing malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. The progression from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to Barrett's esophagus (BE) and ultimately to EAC is thought to be influenced by chronic inflammation and immune cell dynamics. Despite the observed correlations in observational studies, the causal relationships between immune cell phenotypes and this disease continuum remain unclear.

METHODS

This study utilized a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal roles of 731 distinct immune cell phenotypes in the GERD-BE-EAC continuum. The analysis leveraged genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for immune phenotypes from a Sardinian cohort and data for GERD, BE, and EAC from the FinnGen and Open GWAS databases. A comprehensive set of MR methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and weighted median estimators, was employed to assess causality. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy, ensuring the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

The study revealed complex and multifaceted roles of immune cells across the GERD-BE-EAC continuum. In GERD, 34 immune phenotypes were found to be causally associated with either increased or decreased risk. Protective effects were observed in phenotypes such as Unswitched Memory B cells, while others like CD45RA- CD4+ T cells were linked to an elevated risk. In the context of BE, 28 immune phenotypes demonstrated significant causal associations, with the majority being protective, including Unswitched Memory B cells and CD62L on Granulocytes. Conversely, certain phenotypes, such as CD24 on Transitional B cells, were identified as risk factors for BE. For EAC, 34 immune phenotypes were implicated, with various B cell subsets, particularly those expressing BAFF-R and CD24, associated with an increased risk, while Switched Memory B cells and specific myeloid cell phenotypes showed protective effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides novel insights into the complex role of immune cells in the pathogenesis of EAC, revealing a dynamic interplay where certain immune phenotypes may be protective in early stages but become risk-enhancing in later stages of disease progression. These findings highlight the potential of immune cell phenotypes to serve as biomarkers for early detection and targeted therapeutic interventions across the GERD-BE-EAC continuum. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in diverse populations and to explore the underlying mechanisms driving these immune-mediated effects.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology and New Treatment Trends

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus due to a decline in esophageal clearance and anti-reflux barrier mechanisms. Mucosal injury is caused by a combination of gastric juice directly damaging the esophageal mucosa and the immune and inflammatory mechanism in which inflammatory cytokines released from the esophageal mucosal epithelium cause neutrophil migration, triggering inflammation. Gastric secretion inhibitors are the first-line treatment for GERD, but they can be combined with prokinetic agents and Chinese herbal remedies. However, pharmacotherapy cannot improve anatomical problems or prevent physical causes of GERD, such as reflux of non-acidic contents. Therefore, surgery can be warranted, depending on the pathology. Intraluminal endoscopic therapy, which is both less invasive and more effective than surgery, was recently developed and applied in Europe and the United States. In Japan, intraluminal endoscopic therapies, such as anti-reflux mucosectomy, anti-reflux mucosal ablation, and endoscopic submucosal dissection, for GERD have been independently developed.

Kyoto international consensus report on anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical significance of the gastro-oesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

An international meeting was organised to develop consensus on (1) the landmarks to define the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), (2) the occurrence and pathophysiological significance of the cardiac gland, (3) the definition of the gastro-oesophageal junctional zone (GOJZ) and (4) the causes of inflammation, metaplasia and neoplasia occurring in the GOJZ.

DESIGN

Clinical questions relevant to the afore-mentioned major issues were drafted for which expert panels formulated relevant statements and textural explanations.A Delphi method using an anonymous system was employed to develop the consensus, the level of which was predefined as ≥80% of agreement. Two rounds of voting and amendments were completed before the meeting at which clinical questions and consensus were finalised.

RESULTS

Twenty eight clinical questions and statements were finalised after extensive amendments. Critical consensus was achieved: (1) definition for the GOJ, (2) definition of the GOJZ spanning 1 cm proximal and distal to the GOJ as defined by the end of palisade vessels was accepted based on the anatomical distribution of cardiac type gland, (3) chemical and bacterial (Helicobacter pylori) factors as the primary causes of inflammation, metaplasia and neoplasia occurring in the GOJZ, (4) a new definition of Barrett's oesophagus (BO).

CONCLUSIONS

This international consensus on the new definitions of BO, GOJ and the GOJZ will be instrumental in future studies aiming to resolve many issues on this important anatomic area and hopefully will lead to better classification and management of the diseases surrounding the GOJ.

The psycholegal factors for juvenile transfer and reverse transfer evaluations

It remains unclear whether forensic mental health assessments for juvenile reverse transfer (to juvenile court) are distinct from those for juvenile transfer (to adult court). This survey consisted of an updated review of transfer and reverse transfer laws (in jurisdictions that have both mechanisms) in light of the generally accepted three-factor model of functional legal capacities involved in transfer evaluations (i.e., risk, sophistication-maturity, and treatment amenability). Results indicated that a majority of states' reverse transfer statutes refer explicitly or implicitly to the same three psycholegal constructs identified as central for transfer. Given the legal similarity between transfer and reverse transfer, potential practice implications and directions for future research are discussed.

High-resolution manometry in patients with and without globus pharyngeus and/or symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Background

Globus pharyngeus is common and has a low cure rate. Its etiology is complex and reported to be associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, some patients with globus do not exhibit any reflux symptoms or respond to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatments. The purpose of this study was to clarify the related risk factors of these patients with a final objective of improving the curative effect.

Methods

Forty two patients afflicted with globus pharyngeus (G group) and 38 patients without globus pharyngeus (NG group) were included in this study. According to the laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptom Index and the response to PPIs treatments, the patients were further divided into reflux groups (G-R, NG-R) and non-reflux groups (G-NR, NG-NR). High Resolution Manometry (HRM) was performed to assess esophageal motility. Questionnaires, including categories such as life exposure factors, were conducted.

Results

a) The average resting and residual pressures of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in the G-NR group was higher than in the NG-NR and NG-R groups (P < 0.05). b) The average resting and residual pressures of the lower esophageal sphincter showed no differences between the G-NR group and the NG-NR group (P > 0.05). c) The esophageal distal contractile integral score of the G-NR group was not different from the NG-NR group (P > 0.05). d) Compared to the NG-NR group, the G-NR group showed higher incidence of stress, smoking, drinking, high salt and anxiety (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Globus pharyngeus without LPR may occur due to high UES pressure. Stress, smoking, alcoholic drinking, high salt and anxiety may be its risk factors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-017-0666-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.