Current treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: lights and shadows

Disentangling the riddle of systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome: blood transcriptome analysis reveals a less-pronounced IFN-signature and distinct molecular profiles in venous versus arterial events

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome (SLE-APS) represents a challenging SLE endotype whose molecular basis remains unknown.

METHODS

We analysed whole-blood RNA-sequencing data from 299 patients with SLE (108 SLE-antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-positive, including 67 SLE-APS; 191 SLE-aPL-negative) and 72 matched healthy controls (HC). Pathway enrichment analysis, unsupervised weighted gene coexpression network analysis and machine learning were applied to distinguish disease endotypes.

RESULTS

Patients with SLE-APS demonstrated upregulated type I and II interferon (IFN) pathways compared with HC. Using a 100-gene random forests model, we achieved a cross-validated accuracy of 75.6% in distinguishing these two states. Additionally, the comparison between SLE-APS and SLE-aPL-negative revealed 227 differentially expressed genes, indicating downregulation of IFN-α and IFN-γ signatures, coupled with dysregulation of the complement cascade, B-cell activation and neutrophil degranulation. Unsupervised analysis of SLE transcriptome identified 21 gene modules, with SLE-APS strongly linked to upregulation of the 'neutrophilic/myeloid' module. Within SLE-APS, venous thromboses positively correlated with 'neutrophilic/myeloid' and 'B cell' modules, while arterial thromboses were associated with dysregulation of 'DNA damage response (DDR)' and 'metabolism' modules. Anticardiolipin and anti-β2GPI positivity-irrespective of APS status-were associated with the 'neutrophilic/myeloid' and 'protein-binding' module, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a hierarchical upregulation and-likely-dependence on IFN in SLE with the highest IFN signature observed in SLE-aPL-negative patients. Venous thrombotic events are associated with neutrophils and B cells while arterial events with DDR and impaired metabolism. This may account for their differential requirements for anticoagulation and provide rationale for the potential use of mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and the direct fIIa inhibitor dabigatran in SLE-APS.

Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies in Women with Placenta-Mediated Complications Delivered at >34 Weeks of Gestation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of positive antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies among pregnant women with placenta-mediated complications delivered at >34^0/7 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted between 2017 and 2022. Inclusion criteria included pregnant or post-partum women, >18 years, diagnosed with any of the following placenta-mediated complications and delivered at >34^0/7 weeks of gestation: small-for-gestational-age neonate (SGA ≤ 5th percentile according to local birthweight charts), preeclampsia with severe features, and placental abruption. The primary outcome was the prevalence of positive aPL antibodies: Lupus anticoagulant, Anticardiolipin, or Anti-ß2glycoprotein1.

RESULTS

Overall, 431 women met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 378(87.7%) had an SGA neonate, 30 had preeclampsia with severe features (7%), 23 had placental abruption (5.3%), and 21 patients had multiple diagnoses(4.9%). The prevalence of aPL antibodies in the cohort was 4.9% and was comparable between the three subgroups (SGA-3.9%; PET with severe features-3.3%; and placental abruption-13% (p = 0.17)).

CONCLUSION

aPL antibodies prevalence in women with placenta-mediated complications > 34 weeks of gestation was 4.9%, with comparable prevalence rates among the three subgroups. Future prospective studies are needed to delineate the need for treatment in those who tested positive for aPL antibodies and do not meet Anti-Phospholipid Antibody Syndrome clinical criteria.

Heart Valve Involvement in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of a Single Centre

BACKGROUND

Valve involvement is the most common cardiac manifestation in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The objective of the study was to describe the prevalence, clinical and laboratory features, and evolution of APS patients with heart valve involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal and observational study of all APS patients followed by a single centre with at least one transthoracic echocardiographic study.

RESULTS

144 APS patients, 72 (50%) of them with valvular involvement. Forty-eight (67%) had primary APS, and 22 (30%) were associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Mitral valve thickening was the most frequent valve involvement present in 52 (72%) patients, followed by mitral regurgitation in 49 (68%), and tricuspid regurgitation in 29 (40%) patients. Female sex (83% vs. 64%; p = 0.013), arterial hypertension (47% vs. 29%; p = 0.025), arterial thrombosis at APS diagnosis (53% vs. 33%; p = 0.028), stroke (38% vs. 21%; p = 0.043), livedo reticularis (15% vs. 3%; p = 0.017), and lupus anticoagulant (83% vs. 65%; p = 0.021) were more prevalent in those with valvular involvement. Venous thrombosis was less frequent (32% vs. 50%; p = 0.042). The valve involvement group suffered from higher mortality (12% vs. 1%; p = 0.017). Most of these differences were maintained when we compared patients with moderate-to-severe valve involvement (n = 36) and those with no or mild involvement (n = 108).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart valve disease is a frequent manifestation in our cohort of APS patients and is associated with demographic, clinical and laboratory features, and increased mortality. More studies are needed, but our results suggest that there may be a subgroup of APS patients with moderate-to-severe valve involvement with its own characteristics that differs from the rest of the patients with mild valve involvement or without valve involvement.

Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes in a Female with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The use of heparin and low-dose aspirin is the current conventional treatment for pregnant females with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, there is no additional treatment recommended for cases where the standard treatment cannot prevent obstetric complications such as fetal loss and placental insufficiency. Recently, the addition of a novel antimalarial, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), to the conventional treatment has shown the potential to prevent obstetric complications. Herein, we report a case in which the addition of HCQ improved adverse pregnancy outcomes in a pregnant female with systemic lupus erythematosus and aspirin-heparin-resistant APS.

Teriflunomide normalizes anti-anxiety effect in anti-ANXA2 APS mice model teriflunomide in anti-ANXA2 mice model

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) affects the brain by both hypercoagulation and immunological mechanisms. APS is characterized by several autoantibodies binding to a thrombolytic complex including beta-2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI) and annexin A2 (ANXA2). Teriflunomide, an oral drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), has a cytostatic effect on B cells and is therefore a potential antibody-targeting treatment for APS. In this study, we assessed the effect of teriflunomide in two APS mouse models by inducing autoantibody formation against β2-GPI and ANXA2 in female BALB/c mice. The ANXA2 model displayed a behavioral change suggesting an anti-anxiety effect in open field and forced swim tests, early in the course of the disease. This effect was normalized following teriflunomide treatment. Conversely, behavioral tests done later during the study demonstrated depression-like behavior in the ANXA2 model. No behavioral changes were seen in the β2-GPI model. Total brain IgG levels were significantly elevated in the ANXA2 model but not in the teriflunomide treated group. No such change was noted in the brains of the β2-GPI model. High levels of serum autoantibodies were induced in both models, and their levels were not lowered by teriflunomide treatment. Teriflunomide ameliorated behavioral changes in mice immunized with ANXA2 without a concomitant change in serum antibody levels. These findings are compatible with the effect of teriflunomide on neuroinflammation.Teriflunomide ameliorated behavioral and brain IgG levels in mice immunized with ANXA2 without a concomitant change in serum antibody levels. These findings are compatible with an effect of teriflunomide on the IgG permeability to the brain and neuroinflammation.

A retrospective review of antiphospholipid syndrome from a South Asian country

Objectives

This study aims to investigate clinical presentations, antiphospholipid antibody patterns and their levels, therapeutic regimens, and outcomes in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) admitted to a tertiary care hospital of a South Asian country.

Patients and methods

Between January 2009 and December 2019, a total of 216 patients with APS (8 males, 208 females; median age: 35.7±6.9 years; range, 20 to 76 years) who either fulfilled the modified Sydney criteria or those who satisfied only clinical criteria along with positive antiphospholipid antibody on at least one occasion (probable APS) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The majority of the patients (n=183, 84.7%) had obstetric complications, followed by venous thrombosis in 23 (10.8%) patients. Recurrent early abortions in 126 (58.6%) and deep venous thrombosis in 16 (7.4%) patients were the most prevalent obstetrical and venous events, respectively, whereas limb gangrene in seven (3.3%) and ischemic stroke in seven (3.3%) were the most common arterial events. A total of 190 (88%) patients had primary APS, while 26 (12%) had secondary APS. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the frequent association with secondary APS found in 19 (73%) patients. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) anticardiolipin antibody was present in 173 (65.0%) patients, being the most commonly reported antibody. Probable catastrophic APS was found in four (1.9%) patients. Majority of the patients (n=190, 87.9%) were treated with a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular-weight heparin. Single mortality was observed in our study population due to complications related to catastrophic APS.

Conclusion

Antiphospholipid syndrome has a wide range of thrombotic and obstetrical manifestations with important variations in different regions of the world. There is a significant morbidity and mortality related to APS, despite treatment with anticoagulation and; therefore, describing prognostic markers and optimal therapeutic interventions is pivotal to prevent complications.

Effect of hydroxychloroquine on antiphospholipid antibodies-inhibited endometrial angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic events and/or pregnancy morbidity (≥3 recurrent early miscarriage or fetal death or a prematurity <34 weeks of gestation) with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). It is reported that aPLs damage the placental tissue by binding to β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) on the surface of trophoblast and endothelial cells. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is considered to be beneficial in the treatment of obstetrical APS and shown to restore the aPL-inhibited invasion and differentiation of trophoblast. However, not enough evidence exists regarding the effect of HCQ on endometrial angiogenesis. The aim of our study was to assess whether HCQ has an effect on aPL-inhibited endothelial angiogenesis.

METHODS

In this research, to explore the effect of HCQ for angiogenesis, we investigated: (1) Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) viability by CCK-8; (2) HUVECs migration by wound healing; (3) HUVEC angiogenesis by Matrigel assay in vitro; (4) mRNA expression of MMP-2 and VEGF by real-time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR); (5) protein expression of VEGF, MMP-2 by western blot.

RESULTS

We found that HCQ treatment significantly restored the expression of aPL-inhibited VEGF and MMP-2. HCQ restored aPL-inhibited HUVEC proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in vitro.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, aPLs inhibit HUVECs angiogenesis, however, HCQ can restore the effect of aPL-inhibited HUVECs migration and angiogenesis in vitro, demonstrating its beneficial therapeutic role in obstetrical APS.

Management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: what to do in laboratory scenarios that do not fit the guidelines

Introduction: Some patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have not been included in randomized clinical trials or observational registries and, therefore, information on their risk of obstetric or thrombotic recurrence and optimal treatment is scarce.Areas covered: In the present review, the existing evidence regarding the management of two laboratory scenarios not covered by the guidelines is presented: (1) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations and aPL positivity not fulfilling APS laboratory criteria, and (2) the possibility of discontinuing anticoagulation in APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative.Expert opinion: Growing evidence suggests a role for low titers and 'non-criteria' aPL, especially in obstetric APS. Treatment is not formally recommended but might be considered according to the individual's risk profile. Regarding the question of whether or not to discontinue anticoagulants after the 'spontaneous' disappearance of aPL, there is no definite answer. Retrospective studies seem to suggest that withdrawal of anticoagulation could be safe in certain patients with APS, especially in those with a first provoked venous thrombosis and whose aPL became persistently negative during follow-up. Still, before the withdrawal can be recommended in routine clinical practice, multicenter and prospective studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

"Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies": bridging the gap between seropositive and seronegative Antiphospholipid Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the prevalence of non-criteria anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies and their role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in a cohort of patients with clinical features consistent with a diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but persistently negative for criteria aPL-anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2-GPI), and lupus anticoagulant (LA) - named seronegative APS (SN-APS).

METHODS

Sera from SN-APS patients were tested for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, anti-vimentin/cardiolipin (aVim/CL) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) by ELISA. Control groups of our study were APS patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

We enrolled 114 consecutive SN-APS patients, 69 (60.5%) resulted positive for at least one non-criteria test in two occasions 12 weeks apart. Among the persistently positive patients to these tests, 97% resulted positive for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, 52.3% for aVim/CL and 17.4% for aPS/PT. SN-APS patients with double positivity (aCL by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL) showed a likelihood positive ratio of 8 to present mixed thrombotic and obstetrical features. Among SN-APS patients tested positive, after the therapeutic changes, 3 cases of recurrent thrombosis were observed [median follow-up 41 months (IQR 39.5)]. Twenty pregnancies were recorded in 17 SN-APS patients after the detection of unconventional aPL and 12 of them (60%) experienced a good outcome under conventional treatment for APS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest monocentric study demonstrating that aCL tested by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL can detect aPL positivity in SN-APS. It may encourage clinicians to monitoring and providing adequate targeted therapy, which improve SN-APS prognosis.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome-associated renal thrombotic microangiopathy improved not with rivaroxaban but with warfarin in a systemic lupus erythematosus patient without lupus nephritis

A 34-year-old Japanese woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was admitted to our hospital for exacerbation of renal dysfunction, hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two years before admission, she was diagnosed with SLE. Eight years before, lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity was detected without any thrombotic findings. Fourteen months before, renal function started to worsen. Three months before, unprovoked left leg swelling appeared. She was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by ultrasonography. Blood examination revealed mild anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal dysfunction. Rivaroxaban was started after which the left leg swelling subsided. When she was referred to our hospital, LAC was positive, but hypocomplementemia nor elevation of serum anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies was detected. Renal biopsy showed acute and chronic thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) without concurrent lupus nephritis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed new small multiple cerebral infarcts. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), causing renal TMA, new cerebral infarction, and DVT was diagnosed. Rivaroxaban was changed to warfarin. Two months after admission, renal impairment improved, and the complete disappearance of DVT and brain infarcts was confirmed. This case suggests that warfarin may be more effective than direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of APS-associated renal TMA.

Immunosuppressive Treatment in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Is It Worth It?

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the development of venous and/or arterial thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in patients with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a life-threatening form of APS occurring in about 1% of cases. Lifelong anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists remains the cornerstone of the therapy for thrombotic APS, but frequently the use of anticoagulation may be problematic due to the increased risk of bleeding, drug interactions, or comorbidities. Immunosuppressant drugs are widely used to treat several autoimmune conditions, in which their safety and effectiveness have been largely demonstrated. Similar evidence in the treatment of primary APS is limited to case reports or case series, and studies on a large scale lack. Immunomodulatory drugs may be an emerging tool in managing such particular situations, like refractory obstetrical complications, CAPS, or so-called APS non-criteria manifestations. In addition, immunomodulatory drugs may be useful in patients experiencing recurrent thromboembolic events despite optimized anticoagulant therapy. We did a comprehensive review of literature analyzing the possible role of immunomodulation in primary APS to provide a broad overview of potentially safe and effective target treatments for managing this devastating disease.

Pediatric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: from Pathogenesis to Clinical Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms mediated by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) might exert important clinical implications in pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

RECENT FINDINGS

aPL are traditionally regarded as the main pathogenic players in APS, inducing thrombosis via the interaction with fluid-phase and cellular components of coagulation. Recent APS research has focused on the role of β2 glycoprotein I, which bridges innate immunity and coagulation. In pediatric populations, aPL should be screened in appropriate clinical settings, such as thrombosis, multiple-organ dysfunction, or concomitant systemic autoimmune diseases. Children positive for aPL tests often present non-thrombotic non-criteria manifestations or asymptomatic aPL positivity. In utero aPL exposure has been suggested to result in developmental disabilities, warranting long-term follow-up. The knowledge of the multifaceted nature of pediatric APS should be implemented to reduce the risk of underdiagnosing/undertreating this condition. Hopefully, recent pathogenic insights will open new windows of opportunity in the management of pediatric APS.

Self-perceived quality of life of primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients using vitamin K antagonist

PURPOSE

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by thromboembolic events or obstetric complications. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is the treatment of choice for PAPS patients with thrombosis. However, the efficacy of VKA therapy depends on laboratory monitoring, dose adjustment, adequate lifestyle and adherence to treatment. Difficulties with VKA therapy can affect patients' self-perceived health related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aims to evaluate PAPS patients' HRQOL, therapy adherence and knowledge of treatment.

METHODS

A general Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) were used to access APS-patients self-perceived HRQOL. Treatment adherence was measured by the Treatment Measure Adhesion (TMA) - oral anticoagulant version instrument, and knowledge of VKA treatment was measured using the MedTake test.

RESULTS

66 PAPS patients using VKA were assessed. 63% of them were female; the mean age was 41.9 years old, approximately 60% had unprovoked venous thrombosis and one third of the patients had recurrent thrombotic events. The most impacted domain of DASS was "psychological impacts" and the factors associated to anticoagulation related poor HRQOL were: female sex, presence of arterial thrombosis and INR lability. Using the SF-36 instrument, PAPS-patients self-perceived HRQOL was poorer than that of the general Brazilian population and was associated with female sex and presence of cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high adherence to treatment and knowledge of VKA therapy, self-perceived HRQOL is poor in patients with PAPS and is mainly affected by VKA therapy. Searching for better treatment options is warranted.

Management of Women with Antiphospholipid Antibodies or Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), is associated with increased risk of thrombosis and obstetric complications, including preterm delivery and recurrent pregnancy losses. APS shows diverse clinical manifestations and the risk of complications varies among clinical subtypes. Although these patients are usually treated with aspirin and anticoagulants, the optimal treatment in various clinical settings is unclear, as the risk of complications vary among clinical subtypes and the management strategy depends on whether the patient is pregnant or not. Also, there are unmet needs for the evidence-based, pregnancy-related treatment of asymptomatic women positive for aPL. This review focuses on the management of positive aPL or APS in pregnant and postpartum women, and in women attempting to become pregnant. For asymptomatic aPL positive women, no treatment, low dose aspirin (LDA) or LDA plus anticoagulants can be considered during antepartum and postpartum. In obstetric APS patients, preconceptional LDA is recommended. LDA plus low molecular weight heparin is administered after confirmation of pregnancy. Vascular APS patients should take frequent pregnancy test and receive heparin instead of warfarin after confirmation of pregnancy. During pregnancy, heparin plus LDA is recommended. Warfarin can be restarted 4 to 6 hours after vaginal delivery and 6 to 12 hours after cesarean delivery. Most importantly, a tailored approach and patient-oriented treatment are mandatory.

Prevention of recurrent miscarriage in women with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare and rank currently available pharmacological interventions for the prevention of recurrent miscarriage (RM) in women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

A search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CNKI, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the UK National Research Register on December 15, 2019. Studies comparing any types of active interventions with placebo/inactive control or another active intervention for the prevention of RM in patients with APS were considered for inclusion. The primary outcomes were efficacy (measured by live birth rate) and acceptability (measured by all-cause discontinuation); secondary outcomes were birthweight, preterm birth, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth retardation. The protocol of this study was registered with Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/B9T4E).

RESULTS

In total, 54 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 4,957 participants were included. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) alone, aspirin plus LMWH or unfractionated heparin (UFH), aspirin plus LMWH plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), aspirin plus LMWH plus IVIG plus prednisone were found to be effective pharmacological interventions for increasing live birth rate (ORs ranging between 2.88 to 11.24). In terms of acceptability, no significant difference was found between treatments. In terms of adverse perinatal outcomes, aspirin alone was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth than aspirin plus LMWH (OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 16.44) and with lower birthweight than LMWH (SMD -808.76, 95% CI -1596.54 to -5.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of low-dose aspirin plus heparin as the first-line treatment for prevention of RM in women with APS, and support the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, IVIG, and prednisone when added to current treatment regimens. More large-scale, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings, and new pharmacological options should be further evaluated.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in people with antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both), and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence of APS is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with APS.

SEARCH METHODS

We last searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, and ongoing trials registers on 22 November 2019. We checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. We also contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or AP agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS, according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pairs of review authors independently worked on each step of the review, following Cochrane methods. We summarized the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight studies including 811 participants that compared different AP or anticoagulant agents. NOAC (non-VKA oral anticoagulant: rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (vitamin K antagonist: warfarin at moderate International Normalized Ratio [INR] - 2.5) or adjusted [INR 2.0-3.0] dose): In three studies there were no differences in any thromboembolic event (including death) and major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 14.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87 to 106.8; moderate-certainty evidence). One of the studies reported a small benefit of rivaroxaban in terms of quality of life at 180 days measured as health state on Visual Analogue Scale (mean difference [MD] 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-certainty evidence), but not measured as health utility on a scale from 0 to 1 (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10; low-certainty evidence). High-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 3.1 to 4.0 [mean 3.3] or 3.5 [mean 3.2]) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 [mean 2.3] or 2.5 [mean 2.5]): In two studies there were no differences in the rates of thrombotic events and major bleeding (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23, low-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of minor bleeding in one study during a mean of 3.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.2) of follow-up (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07). In both trials there was evidence of a higher risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-certainty evidence) in the high-dose VKA group, and for this outcome (any bleeding) the incidence is not different, only the time to event is showing an effect. Standard-dose VKA plus a single AP agent (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 plus aspirin 100 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0): One high-risk-of-bias study showed an increased risk of any thromboembolic event with combined treatment (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.43; low-certainty evidence) and reported on major bleeding with five cases in the combined treatment group and one case in the standard-dose VKA treatment group, resulting in RR 7.42 (95% CI 0.91 to 60.7; low-certainty evidence) and no differences for secondary outcomes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Single/dual AP agent and standard-dose VKA (pooled results): Two high-risk-of-bias studies compared a combination of AP and VKA (aspirin 100 mg/d plus warfarin or unspecified VKA at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 or 2.0 to 2.5) with a single AP agent (aspirin 100 mg/d), but did not provide any conclusive evidence regarding the effects of those drugs in people with APS (very low-certainty evidence). One of the above-mentioned studies was a three-armed study that compared a combination of AP and VKA (aspirin 100 mg/d plus warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 2.5) with dual AP therapy (aspirin 100 mg/d plus cilostazol 200 mg/d) and dual AP therapy (aspirin 100 mg/d plus cilostazol 200 mg/d) versus a single AP treatment (aspirin 100 mg/d). This study reported on stroke (very low-certainty evidence) but did not report on any thromboembolic events, major bleeding, or any secondary outcomes. We identified two ongoing studies and three studies are awaiting classification.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence identified indicates that NOACs compared with standard-dose VKAs may increase the risk of stroke and do not appear to alter the risk of other outcomes (moderate-certainty evidence). Using high-dose VKA versus standard-dose VKA did not alter the risk of any thromboembolic event or major bleeding but may increase the risk of any form of bleeding (low-certainty evidence). Standard-dose VKA combined with an AP agent compared with standard-dose VKA alone may increase the risk of any thromboembolic event and does not appear to alter the risk of major bleeding or other outcomes (low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the benefit or harm of using standard-dose VKA plus AP agents versus single or dual AP therapy, or dual versus single AP therapy, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis in people with APS (very low-certainty evidence).

Comparative study of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) and non-criteria obstetric APS (NC-OAPS): report of 1640 cases from the EUROAPS registry

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical features, laboratory data and fetal-maternal outcomes between 1000 women with obstetric APS (OAPS) and 640 with aPL-related obstetric complications not fulfilling Sydney criteria (non-criteria OAPS, NC-OAPS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective and prospective multicentre study from the European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

RESULTS

A total of 1650 women with 5251 episodes, 3601 of which were historical and 1650 latest episodes, were included. Altogether, 1000 cases (OAPS group) fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria and 650 (NC-OAPS group) did not. Ten NC-OAPS cases were excluded for presenting thrombosis during follow-up. All cases were classified as category I (triple positivity or double positivity for aPL) or category II (simple positivity). Overall, aPL laboratory categories showed significant differences: 29.20% in OAPS vs 17.96% in NC-OAPS (P < 0.0001) for category I, and 70.8% in OAPS vs 82% in NC-OAPS (P < 0.0001) for category II. Significant differences were observed when current obstetric complications were compared (P < 0.001). However, major differences between groups were not observed in treatment rates, livebirths and thrombotic complications. In the NC-OAPS group, 176/640 (27.5%) did not fulfil Sydney clinical criteria (subgroup A), 175/640 (27.34%) had a low titre and/or non-persistent aPL positivity but did meet the clinical criteria (subgroup B) and 289/640 (45.15%) had a high aPL titre but did not fulfil Sydney clinical criteria (subgroup C).

CONCLUSION

Significant clinical and laboratory differences were found between groups. Fetal-maternal outcomes were similar in both groups when treated. These results suggest that we could improve our clinical practice with better understanding of NC-OAPS patients.

A glimpse into the history of description of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Prior to 1983, several landmark reports prepared the stage for a detailed description of the Antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome (APS). Formerly depicted as lupus-like, APS exhibits a wide spectrum of symptoms that overlap with Sjogren's, Hashimoto, and other autoimmune diseases. In this review, we take a glimpse into the history of description of APS, discussing the events that led to its recognition as one of the most common autoimmune diseases and the enormous impact of that recognition in the rheumatology field.

Treatment of Secondary Chorea: A Review of the Current Literature

Background

Chorea consists of involuntary movements affecting the limbs, trunk, neck or face, that can move from one body part to another. Chorea is conceptualized as being "primary" when it is attributed to Huntington's disease (HD) or other genetic etiologies, or "secondary" when it is related to infectious, pharmacologic, metabolic, autoimmune disorders, or paraneoplastic syndromes. The mainstay of the secondary chorea management is treating the underlying causative disorder; here we review the literature regarding secondary chorea. We also discuss the management of several non-HD genetic diseases in which chorea can be a feature, where metabolic targets may be amenable to intervention and chorea reduction.

Methods

A PubMed literature search was performed for articles relating to chorea and its medical and surgical management. We reviewed the articles and cross-references of pertinent articles to assess the current clinical practice, expert opinion, and evidence-based medicine to synthesize recommendations for the management of secondary chorea.

Results

There are very few double-blind randomized controlled trials assessing chorea treatments regardless of etiology. Most recommendations are based on small open-label studies, case reports, and expert opinion.

Discussion

Treatment of secondary chorea is currently based on expert opinion, clinical experience, and small case studies, with limited evidence-based medical data. When chorea is secondary to an underlying infection, medication, metabolic abnormality, autoimmune process, or paraneoplastic illness, the movements typically resolve following treatment of the underlying disease. Tardive dyskinesia is most rigorously studied secondary chorea with the best evidence-based medicine treatment guidelines recommending the use of pre-synaptic dopamine-depleting agents. Even though there is an insufficient pool of EBM, small clinical trials, case reports, and expert opinion are valuable for guiding treatment and improving the quality of life for patients with chorea.

Highlights

There is a dearth of well-controlled studies regarding the treatment of chorea. Expert opinion and clinical experiences are fundamental in guiding chorea management and determining successful treatment. In general, secondary chorea improves with treating the underlying medical abnormality; treatments include antibiotics, antivirals, immunosuppression, dopamine depleting agents, chelation, and supportive care.

High risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with a persistent lupus anticoagulant

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) has been associated with pregnancy complications and pregnancy loss. Identification of predictive factors could aid in deciding on therapeutic management. To identify risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk women with persistently positive LA, we prospectively followed 82 women of childbearing age, of whom 23 had 40 pregnancies within the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study. Pregnancy complications occurred in 28/40 (70%) pregnancies, including 22 (55%) spontaneous abortions (<10th week of gestation [WOG]: n = 12, 10th to 24th WOG: n = 10) and 6 deliveries <34th WOG (15%, 3 due to severe preeclampsia/HELLP [hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and a low platelet count] syndrome, 3 due to placental insufficiency). One abortion was followed by catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Neither a history of pregnancy complications nor of thrombosis, or prepregnancy antiphospholipid antibody levels were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. In logistic regression analysis, higher age was associated with a lower risk of adverse pregnancy outcome (per 5 years' increase: odds ratio [OR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.87), a high Rosner index (index of circulating anticoagulant) predicted an increased risk (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.08-18.93). Live birth rate was 15/28 (54%) in women on the combination of low-molecular-weight heparin and low-dose aspirin and 3/12 (25%) in those with no treatment or a single agent. We conclude that the risk of severe, even life-threatening pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes is very high in women with persistent LA. A high Rosner index indicates an increased risk. Improved treatment options for women with persistently positive LA are urgently needed.

Managing antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The antibodies currently included in the classification criteria include lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-^2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (^2GPI). APS can present with a variety of clinical phenotypes, including thrombosis in the veins, arteries and microvasculature and obstetrical complications. Pregnancy complications in obstetric APS (OAPS) include unexplained recurrent early pregnancy loss, fetal death, or premature birth due to severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction or other consequences of placental insufficiency. Careful, well monitored obstetric care with the use of aspirin and heparin has likely improved the pregnancy outcome in obstetric APS and currently approximately 70-80% of pregnant women with APS have a successful pregnancy outcome. However, the current standard of care does not prevent all pregnancy complications as the current treatment fails in 20-30% of APS pregnancies. Other treatments options are currently being explored and retrospective studies suggest that trials with hydroxychloroquine and possibly pravastatin are warranted in pregnant women with aPL. In this review will focus on the current treatment of OAPS.

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: refining the value of "non-criteria" antibodies for diagnosis and clinical management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombotic manifestations and/or pregnancy-related complications in patients with persistently high antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), the most common being represented by anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-beta 2 glycoprotein-I (aβ2GPI), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). A growing number of studies have showed that, in some cases, patients may present with clinical features of APS but with temporary positive or persistently negative titers of aPL. For these patients, the definition of seronegative APS (SN-APS) has been proposed. Nevertheless, the negativity to classic aPL criteria does not imply that other antibodies may be present or involved in the onset of thrombosis. The diagnosis of SN-APS is usually made by exclusion, but its recognition is important to adopt the most appropriate anti-thrombotic strategy to reduce the rate of recurrences. This research is in continuous development as the clinical relevance of these antibodies is far from being completely clarified. The most studied antibodies are those against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, vimentin/cardiolipin complex, and annexin A5. Moreover, the assays to measure the levels of these antibodies have not yet been standardized. In this review, we will summarize the evidence on the most studied non-criteria aPL, their potential clinical relevance, and the antithrombotic therapeutic strategies available in the setting of APS and SN-APS.

Annexin-A5 resistance and non-criteria antibodies for the diagnosis of seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome

In this study, we aimed to analyze the value of annexin-A5 anticoagulant ratio (A5R) and non-criteria antibodies for the diagnosis of APS in patients with clinical seronegative APS. Three groups were defined, including 21 seronegative APS patients with unexplained obstetrical adverse events or thrombosis history, 15 confirmed APS patients with triple aPL positivity, and a control group of 20 healthy patients without any history of thrombosis or pregnancy complications. Seronegative APS patients have similar levels of A5R in comparison to healthy controls (202% [171%-238%] versus 191% [178%-221%]; p = 0.65), whereas triple-positive APS patients have significantly more reduced A5R in comparison to both seronegative and healthy patients (149% [138%-158%] versus 202% [171%-238%] and 191% [178%-221%], respectively, p < 0.001). The non-criteria aPL were found in 24% of seronegative APS: anti-PE IgM in 3 cases (14%) and anti-PS/PT IgG and anti-PS/PT IgM in 1 (5%) case each. The frequency of non-criteria APL was significantly more frequent in comparison to healthy controls (p = 0.048). All triple-positive APS patients have at least one non-criteria aPL, and the non-criteria aPL were significantly more frequent in these patients compared to seronegative APS and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Whereas A5R levels do not allow to discriminate seronegative APS from healthy controls, our results demonstrate that non-criteria aPL can help to APS diagnosis in clinical seronegative APS.Key points• Annexin-A5 resistance testing does not help for the diagnosis of seronegative APS.• The non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies can contribute to APS diagnosis in patients without conventional antibodies.

Anaesthetic considerations for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombotic autoimmune disorder that is clinically characterized by the development of thrombosis and obstetric morbidities in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Due to hypercoagulability, the focus of management is anticoagulation for the prevention of thrombosis and its recurrence. When such patients undergo surgery, however, the underlying risk of thrombosis increases as a result of anticoagulant withdrawal, immobilization, and/or intimal injury. Conversely, there is also an increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopaenia, possible disseminated intravascular coagulation, or progression to catastrophic APS, as a result of excessive anticoagulation, surgery, and infection. Measures for appropriate perioperative anticoagulation are discussed in this review, as well as anaesthetic considerations for preventing perioperative complications in patients with APS undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome occurrence in patients with persistent anti-phospholipid antibodies

We investigated the overall frequency of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) occurrence in Korean patients with consecutively detected anti-phospholipid antibodies with an interval of 12 weeks (persistent aPLs). We retrospectively reviewed the results of blood tests of aPLs in 14,889 patients in whom aPL tests were performed at Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, from January 2012 to August 2018, and included 833 patients with persistent aPLs. We obtained clinical and laboratory data including anti-cardiolipin antibodies IgM and IgG, anti-beta2 glycoprotein1 IgM and IgG, and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Of 833 patients with persistent aPLs, 96 patients (11.5%) had APS (84 patients had thrombotic events and 12 had pregnancy morbidity). Among aPLs, LAC was detected in patients with APS more frequently than asymptomatic carriers of aPLs (46.9% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001). Patients with LAC (relative risk (RR) 2.558, p < 0.001) and aPLs ≥ 2 (RR 1.731, p = 0.014) exhibited the higher rate of APS occurrence than those without. Moreover, patients with aPLs ≥ 3 and aPLs ≥ 4 exhibited the higher rates of APS occurrence than those without (RR 2.753, p < 0.001 and RR 3.209, p = 0.013). Meanwhile, patients with ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-SSA/Ro, and SLE exhibited the increased frequency of LAC positivity, compared to those without (RR 3.304, p = 0.005, RR 4.269, p = 0.032, RR 3.750, p = 0.041 and RR 8.828, p < 0.001, respectively). APS occurs in 11.5% of Korean patients with persistent aPLs. LAC positivity and aPLs ≥ 2 were significantly associated with APS occurrence. SLE and SLE-related autoantibodies were associated with LAC positivity.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies Overlapping in Isolated Neurological Syndrome and Multiple Sclerosis: Neurobiological Insights and Diagnostic Challenges

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by arterial and venous thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity and fetal loss caused by pathogenic autoantibodies directed against phospholipids (PL) and PL-cofactors. Isolated neurological APS may represent a significant diagnostic challenge, as epidemiological, clinical and neuroimaging features may overlap with those of multiple sclerosis (MS). In an open view, MS could be considered as an organ-specific anti-lipid (phospholipid and glycosphingolipid associated proteins) disease, in which autoreactive B cells and CD8+ T cells play a dominant role in its pathophysiology. In MS, diverse autoantibodies against the lipid-protein cofactors of the myelin sheath have been described, whose pathophysiologic role has not been fully elucidated. We carried out a review to select clinical studies addressing the prevalence of antiphospholipid (aPL) autoantibodies in the so-called MS-like syndrome. The reported prevalence ranged between 2% and 88%, particularly aCL and aβ2GPI, with predominant IgM isotype and suggesting worse MS prognosis. Secondarily, an updated summary of current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms and events responsible for these conditions is presented. We draw attention to the clinical relevance of diagnosing isolated neurological APS. Prompt and accurate diagnosis and antiaggregant and anticoagulant treatment of APS could be vital to prevent or at least reduce APS-related morbidity and mortality.

Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are characterised by an abnormal immune system response, complement activation, cytokines dysregulation and inflammation. In last years, despite many progresses in managing these patients, it has been shown that clinical remission is reached in less than 50% of patients and a personalised and tailored therapeutic approach is still lacking resulting in a significant gap between guidelines and real-world practice. In this context, the need for biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and profiling those individuals at the highest risk for a poor outcome has become of crucial interest. A biomarker generally refers to a measured characteristic which may be used as an indicator of some biological state or condition. Three different types of medical biomarkers has been suggested: i. mechanistic markers; ii. clinical disease markers; iii. therapeutic markers. A combination of biomarkers from these different groups could be used for an ideal more accurate diagnosis and treatment. However, although a growing body of evidence is focused on improving biomarkers, a significant amount of this information is not integrated on standard clinical care. The overarching aim of this work was to clarify the meaning of specific biomarkers during autoimmune diseases; their possible role in confirming diagnosis, predicting outcome and suggesting specific treatments.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and the Neurologist: From Pathogenesis to Therapy

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune antibody-mediated condition characterized by thrombotic events and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistent positivity to antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The nervous system is frequently affected, as intracranial vessels are the most frequent site of arterial pathology. Over the course of years, many other neurological conditions not included in the diagnostic criteria, have been associated with APS. The pathogenic mechanisms behind the syndrome are complex and not fully elucidated. aPL enhance thrombosis, interfering with different pathways. Nevertheless, ischemic injury is not always sufficient to explain clinical features of the syndrome and immune-mediated damage has been advocated. This may be particularly relevant in the context of neurological complications. The reason why only a subgroup of patients develop non-criteria nervous system disorders and what determines the clinical phenotype are questions that remain open. The double nature, thrombotic and immunologic, of APS is also reflected by therapeutic strategies. In this review we summarize known neurological manifestations of APS, revisiting pathogenesis and current treatment options.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare disease characterised by venous and/or arterial thrombosis, pregnancy complications and the presence of specific autoantibodies called antiphospholipid antibodies. This review aims to identify existing clinical practice guidelines (CPG) as part of the ERN ReCONNET project, aimed at evaluating existing CPGs or recommendations in rare and complex diseases. Seventeen papers providing important data were identified; however, the literature search highlighted the scarceness of reliable clinical data to develop CPGs. With no formal clinical guidelines in place, diagnosis and treatment of APS is largely based on consensus and expert opinion. Patients' unmet need refers to the understanding of the disease and its clinical picture and implications, the need of education for patients, family members and healthcare providers, as well as to the development of monitoring pathways involving multiple healthcare providers.

Management of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome, also known as 'Hughes Syndrome', is an autoimmune disease characterised by a set of clinical manifestations, almost all of which are direct or indirect sequelae of a hypercoagulable state involving the venous, and to a lesser extent the arterial vasculature. The incidence and prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome are estimated at approximately 5 de novo cases per 100 000 per year and 40-50 cases per 100 000 individuals, respectively. The clinical spectrum of antiphospholipid syndrome involves haematological (thrombocytopaenia, venous thrombosis), obstetrical (recurrent pregnancy loss), neurological (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, migraine, seizures, cognitive dysfunction, chorea, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis), cardiovascular (cardiac valve disease), dermatological (livedo reticularis and racemosa, skin ulceration and necrosis), renal (glomerulonephritis, renal thrombotic microangiopathy) and orthopaedic (avascular necrosis of bones, non-traumatic fractures) manifestations, among others. In addition to the classical antiphospholipid antibodies, namely anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, new autoantibodies and antibody complexes of different immunoglobulin subtypes (IgA, IgG, IgM) are now recognised as significant contributors to the pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone in the management of antiphospholipid syndrome; nevertheless, new drugs and therapeutic strategies are being tested, and some have been found effective for the primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

The anti-thrombotic effects of vitamin D and their possible relationship with antiphospholipid syndrome

The importance of the immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D has recently been associated with autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to the development of autoimmune conditions. Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic events and obstetric complications in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Current data show that patients with antiphospholipid syndrome have a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency even without classic risk factors. Several studies have suggested vitamin D may have anti-thrombotic functions. In antiphospholipid syndrome, low vitamin D serum levels have been associated with thrombotic manifestations, suggesting a possible protective role of vitamin D in antiphospholipid syndrome. This literature review presents current evidence on the haemostatic functions of vitamin D and their possible relationship with the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Insights into the diagnosis and pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), formerly known as Anticardiolipin or Hughes syndrome, is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by obstetrical complications and thrombotic events affecting almost every organ-system in patients persistently testing positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The contribution of the extra-criteria aPL to the pathogenesis of APS have exceeded the expectations of a simple, direct pathologic 'hit' leading to thrombogenesis or obstetrical complications, and more pathologic pathways are being linked directly or indirectly to aPL. The value of extra-criteria aPL is on the rise, and these antibodies are nowadays evaluated as markers for risk assessment in the diagnostic approach to APS. A diagnosis of APS should be considered in pediatric patients with suggestive clinical and laboratory picture. Management of APS remains mostly based on anticoagulation, while other drugs are being tested for efficacy and side effects. Low-dose aspirin may have a role in the management of thrombotic and obstetric APS. Due to the high variability in disease severity and complication recurrence outcomes, new tools are being developed and validated to assess the damage index and quality of life of APS patients.

Current insights in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined as the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetric morbidity in patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In this review, we will highlight the most important clinical presentations of APS with a focus on the obstetric morbidity, the current management strategies and the outlook for the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of aspirin and heparin has improved the pregnancy outcome in obstetric APS and approximately 70% of pregnant women with APS have a successful pregnancy outcome. Unfortunately, the current standard of care does not prevent all pregnancy complications as the current treatment fails in 20-30% of APS pregnancies. This therefore highlights the need for alternative treatments to improve obstetrical outcome. Other treatment options are currently explored and retrospective studies show that pravastatin for example is beneficial in women with aPL-related early preeclampsia. Moreover, the immunmodulator hydroxychloroquine may play a beneficial role in the prevention of aPL-related pregnancy complications.

SUMMARY

APS is among the most frequent acquired risk factors for a treatable cause of recurrent pregnancy loss and increases the risk of conditions associated with ischaemic placental dysfunction, such as fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, premature birth and intrauterine death. Current treatment is mainly based on aspirin and heparin. Studies to inform on alternative treatment options are urgently needed.

Neurologic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome

Neurological involvement in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is common, and its occurrence increases morbidity and mortality. Patients may present variable neurological involvement, such as cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, headache, seizures, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis-like syndrome, transverse myelitis and ocular symptoms. Most neurological manifestations are associated with thrombosis of the microcirculation or of large vessels; nonetheless, there is compelling evidence suggesting that, in some cases, symptoms are secondary to an immune-mediated pathogenesis, with direct binding of aPL on neurons and glia. Herein we describe clinical characteristics and management of neurological APS manifestations.

CD39 and CD73 activity are protective in a mouse model of antiphospholipid antibody-induced miscarriages

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder of young adults associated with devastating pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriages, preeclampsia and low birth weight) and vascular complications including thrombosis. The key components implicated in pathogenesis of APS are the complement cascade and tissue factor (TF) activity causing inflammation and coagulation. Purinergic signalling involving catabolism of ATP to adenosine by cell-surface enzymes CD39 and CD73 has anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects. We studied whether activities of CD39 and CD73 are important in preventing the development of miscarriages in APS.

METHODS

We studied frequency of miscarriages and decidual pathology following passive transfer of human aPL-ab to pregnant wildtype mice, and mice deficient in CD39 and CD73, and also transgenic mice exhibiting 2-3X higher CD39 activity.

RESULTS

aPL-ab infusion in pregnant CD39-or CD73-knockout mice triggers an increase in miscarriages, associated with increased TF expression and complement deposition as well as elevated oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IL-10 expression within the placental decidua. In contrast, aPL-ab induced miscarriages are prevented in mice over-expressing CD39, with reduced decidual TF expression and C3d deposition, diminished lipid peroxidation (4-hydroxynonenal or 4-HNE positive lipid adducts), and reduced TNF-α expression.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate a protective role for CD39 in APS and provide rationale for both the development of endothelial cell-targeted soluble CD39 as a novel therapeutic for APS and analysis of perturbations in the purinergic pathway to explain human disease.

Subsequent Thrombotic Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke with Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity

PURPOSE

International consensus criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and medium or high titers in association with clinical manifestations. However, the clinical relevance of persistence and titers of aPL in patients with stroke has not been identified. We aimed to investigate the risk of subsequent thrombotic events in patients with ischemic stroke with aPL positivity in terms of aPL status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 99 patients with ischemic stroke with at least one or more aPL-positivity (i.e., positivity for aCL, anti-β2-glycoprotein-1, and/or lupus anticoagulants). The patients were divided into two groups: "definite APS" who fulfilled the laboratory criteria and "indefinite APS" who fell short of the criteria. We compared the risk of subsequent thrombotic events between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients, 46 (46%) were classified as having definite APS and 53 (54%) as having indefinite APS. The mean follow-up was 51.6 months. Overall event numbers were 14 (30.4%) in definite APS and 16 (30.2%) in indefinite APS. Increased subsequent thrombotic events (hazard ratio 1.039; 95% confidence interval 0.449-2.404; p=0.930) and decreased time to thrombotic events (log-rank p=0.321) were not associated with aPL status.

CONCLUSION

There was no increased risk of subsequent thrombotic events in ischemic stroke patients with definite APS, compared with those with indefinite APS.

Rheumatic diseases and autoimmune vascular dementia

Vascular dementia (VD) comes second after Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a cause of impaired cognition. VD is not a specific nosological entity, but rather a syndrome encompassing a number of diseases caused by impaired supply of blood to the brain. Systemic autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can be associated with dementia. VD is often related to the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, but it may also be associated with a host of disorders affecting the brain blood vessels, neuronal cells, or both. It is important to entertain in the differential diagnosis of VD, to recognize and to cure them accurately in order to preserve life's quality of our patients.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in people with antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both) and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2017), CENTRAL (last search February 2017), MEDLINE (from 1948 to February 2017), Embase (from 1980 to February 2017), and several ongoing trials registers. We also checked the reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and we contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people diagnosed with APS according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pairs of review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion or by consulting a third review author and, in addition, one review author checked all the extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies involving 419 randomized participants with APS. Only one study was at low risk of bias in all domains. One study was at low risk of bias in all domains for objective outcomes but not for quality of life (measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire). We judged the other three studies to be at unclear or high risk of bias in three or more domains.The duration of intervention ranged from 180 days to a mean of 3.9 years. One study compared rivaroxaban (a novel oral anticoagulant: NOAC) with standard warfarin treatment and reported no thrombotic or major bleeding events, but it was not powered to detect such differences (low-quality evidence). Investigators reported similar rates of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (risk ratio (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 8.33; moderate-quality evidence) and minor bleeding (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.83) for participants receiving rivaroxaban and the standard vitamin K antagonists (VKA). This study also reported some small benefit with rivaroxaban over the standard VKA treatment in terms of quality of life health state measured at 180 days with the EQ-5D-5L 100 mm visual analogue scale (mean difference (MD) 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-quality evidence) but not measured as health utility (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10 [on a scale from 0 to 1]).Two studies compared high dose VKA (warfarin) with moderate/standard intensity VKA and found no differences in the rates of any thrombotic events (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23) or major bleeding (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.25) between the groups (low-quality evidence). Minor bleeding analyzed using the RR and any bleeding using the hazard ratio (HR) were more frequent in participants receiving high-intensity warfarin treatment compared to the standard-intensity therapy (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07; and HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-quality evidence).In one study, it was not possible to estimate the RR for stroke with a combination of VKA plus antiplatelet agent compared to a single antiplatelet agent, while for major bleeding, a single event occurred in the single antiplatelet agent group. In one study, comparing combined VKA plus antiplatelet agent with dual antiplatelet therapy, the RR of the risk of stroke over three years of observation was 5.00 (95% CI 0.26 to 98.0). In a single small study, the RR for stroke during one year of observation with a dual antiplatelet therapy compared to single antiplatelet drug was 0.14 (95% CI 0.01 to 2.60).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence for or against NOACs or for high-intensity VKA compared to the standard VKA therapy in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS. There is some evidence of harm for high-intensity VKA regarding minor and any bleeding. The evidence was also not sufficient to show benefit or harm for VKA plus antiplatelet agent or dual antiplatelet therapy compared to a single antiplatelet drug. Future studies should be adequately powered, with proper adherence to treatment, in order to evaluate the effects of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or both, for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS. We have identified five ongoing trials mainly using NOACs in APS, so increasing experimental efforts are likely to yield additional evidence of clinical relevance in the near future.

Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An undervalued association?

Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by symptoms and signs suggestive of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD), but which do not fulfill all the established criteria for definite diagnosis of a condition. Although a third of UCTDs can progress to a definite ARD within months or years, most UCTDs can remain stable for years with minimal disease activity. The annual incidence of UCTD in the general population ranges from 14 to 140 per 100 000 people. UCTDs are associated with the persistence of several circulating autoantibodies including antinuclear, antiphospholipid or antithyroid antibodies. Immunological evaluation of subjects with UCTDs suggests a proinflammatory state and dysregulation of the Th1/Th2 balance. Autoantibodies have well-known deleterious effects on placentation and have been associated with an increased risk of prematurity, fetal growth restriction (FGR), preeclampsia, and congenital atrioventricular heart block. Although epidemiological and biological data suggest a potential negative impact on reproductive outcomes, the relationship between UCTD and pregnancy outcomes has not been adequately studied. While awaiting definitive data from large studies, obstetricians should be aware that rheumatic disorders in their early, incomplete, or undifferentiated phases can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes, increasing the likelihood of pregnancy loss, FGR, preeclampsia, and prematurity.