The influence of prednisone on the efficacy of docetaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Tunable polymeric micelles for taxane and corticosteroid co-delivery

Nanomedicine holds promise for potentiating drug combination therapies. Increasing (pre)clinical evidence is available exemplifying the value of co-formulating and co-delivering different drugs in modular nanocarriers. Taxanes like paclitaxel (PTX) are widely used anticancer agents, and commonly combined with corticosteroids like dexamethasone (DEX), which besides for suppressing inflammation and infusion reactions, are increasingly explored for modulating the tumor microenvironment towards enhanced nano-chemotherapy delivery and efficacy. We here set out to develop a size- and release rate-tunable polymeric micelle platform for co-delivery of taxanes and corticosteroids. We synthesized amphiphilic mPEG-b-p(HPMAm-Bz) block copolymers of various molecular weights and used them to prepare PTX and DEX single- and double-loaded micelles of different sizes. Both drugs could be efficiently co-encapsulated, and systematic comparison between single- and co-loaded formulations demonstrated comparable physicochemical properties, encapsulation efficiencies, and release profiles. Larger micelles showed slower drug release, and DEX release was always faster than PTX. The versatility of the platform was exemplified by co-encapsulating two additional taxane-corticosteroid combinations, demonstrating that drug hydrophobicity and molecular weight are key properties that strongly contribute to drug retention in micelles. Altogether, our work shows that mPEG-b-p(HPMAm-Bz) polymeric micelles serve as a tunable and versatile nanoparticle platform for controlled co-delivery of taxanes and corticosteroids, thereby paving the way for using these micelles as a modular carrier for multidrug nanomedicine.

Current Trends in Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among men. Despite advances in diagnosis and management, prostate cancer led to more than 300,000 deaths globally in 2020. Chemotherapy is a cornerstone of therapy for advanced prostate cancer and can prolong survival of patients with both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant disease. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the data supporting implementation of chemotherapy in the modern treatment of advanced prostate cancer, with special attention to the use of chemotherapy for aggressive variant prostate cancer (e.g., neuroendocrine prostate cancer) and the combination of chemotherapy with androgen signaling inhibitors. As the field of prostate cancer research continues to rapidly evolve yielding novel agents and treatment modalities, chemotherapy continues to play an essential role in prolonging the survival of patients with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

Visceral Metastasis Predicts Response to New Hormonal Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Visceral metastasis (VM) and a higher number of bone metastasis generally define high volume/risk in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Subgroup analysis of pivotal trials did not show a clear benefit of second-generation non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAAs) in patients with VM. However, subgroup analysis of the trial assessing abiraterone acetate, a CYP 17 inhibitor, plus prednisone (AAP) showed an improved overall survival (OS) in patients with mCSPC with VM. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and congress abstracts for the phase III randomized controlled trials of second-generation NSAAs and AAP in patients with mCSPC. In this pooled analysis, we included 6485 patients from the 6 phase III trials. The rate of patients with VM was 15.2%. Interestingly, in contrast to NSAAs, AAP seems to be effective in improving OS among patients with VM (hazard ratio, HR: 0.89, 95% CI, 0.72-1.11, P = .30 for second-generation NSAAs; HR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.40-0.84, P = .004 for AAP). In contrast, both second-generation NSAAs (HR: 0.63, 95% CI, 0.57-0.70, P < .001) and AAP (HR: 0.68, 95% CI, 0.57-0.81, P < .001) improved OS in patients without VM. In this pooled analysis, we demonstrate that while AAP provided an OS improvement in patients with VM, second-generation NSAAs did not demonstrate a similar OS benefit in this population.

Objective response rate of placebo in randomized controlled trials of anticancer medicines

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous regression of advanced solid tumors is infrequent but may occur. Quantifying response rates from placebo in cancer drug trials may provide important information for physicians, patients, and regulators. We aimed to provide a pooled placebo response rate from drug trials in advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

We pooled the overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR) and partial response rates (PR) in the placebo arm of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer drugs for advanced solid tumors published during 2015-2021 using random-effects model.

FINDINGS

45 phase 3 RCTs including 5684 patients on placebo met our inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. The pooled overall ORR, CR and PR rates in the placebo arm were 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%), 0% (95% CI, 0%-0%), and 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%) respectively. Higher placebo responses were observed in prostate cancer and sarcoma trials.

INTERPRETATION

Overall, 1% patients with advanced solid tumors can expect to achieve some response even in absence of treatment. However, complete regression without treatment is extremely rare, almost zero percent. This information will be helpful to patients in their decisions, as well as regulators in evaluating cancer drugs' efficacy based on response rates alone.

FUNDING

None.

A proper statistical inference framework to compare clinical trial and real-world progression-free survival data

The past decade has witnessed an increasing trend in utilizing external control data in clinical trials, especially in the form of synthetic control arms (SCA) derived from real-world or historical trial data. Including such data in clinical trial analysis can improve trial feasibility and efficiency, provided the issues caused by non-randomization and systematic differences are appropriately addressed. Current methodology development in this area focuses on establishing the comparability of patient baseline characteristics between arms, and more research is needed to ensure comparability of other elements such as endpoints. Motivated by the comparative analysis of SCA progression-free survival (PFS) and trial arm PFS, we aim to address another important but little discussed issue for external time-to-event (TTE) data that depend on disease assessment schedules (DAS). Since DAS are generally inconsistent across different data sources, we propose a proper statistical inference framework that harmonizes the DAS through data augmentation by multiple imputation. We demonstrate through extensive simulations that the proposed framework is unbiased in estimating median TTE and hazard ratio, well controls the type I error and achieves desirable power for log-rank test, while the unadjusted analysis can be biased and suffer from severe type I error inflation or power loss depending on the direction of the bias. Given the desirable performance, we recommend the proposed framework for comparative analysis using external DAS-based TTE data in clinical trials.

Drug resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an update on the status quo

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in men globally. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of PCa, a significant proportion of patients with high-risk localized disease and all patients with advanced disease at diagnosis will experience progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Multiple drugs are now approved as the standard of care treatments for patients with mCRPC that have been shown to prolong survival. Although the majority of patients will respond initially, primary and secondary resistance to these therapies make mCRPC an incurable disease. Several molecular mechanisms underlie the development of mCRPC, with the androgen receptor (AR) axis being the main driver as well as the key drug target. Understanding resistance mechanisms is crucial for discovering novel therapeutic strategies to delay or reverse the progression of the disease. In this review, we address the diverse mechanisms of drug resistance in mCRPC. In addition, we shed light on emerging targeted therapies currently being tested in clinical trials with promising potential to overcome mCRPC-drug resistance.

Multiple Docetaxel Retreatments Without Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the Docetaxel-Only Era: Effects on PSA Kinetics and Survival

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the effects of multiple docetaxel (DOC) treatments on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were sensitive to first-line DOC and received no other life-prolonging agents. To eliminate the effect of cortisone on serum PSA, only patients who were treated without prednisone were included.

Methods

This IRB-approved retrospective study evaluated 52 patients with mCRPC who were retreated using DOC after first-line DOC (without prednisone in both cases), based on a PSA response of > 50% and no radiographic progression. Twenty-three PSA-based factors, including static and kinetic PSA measures, were evaluate for their ability to predict overall survival (OS)

Results

The patients received 688 cycles of DOC in 143 series, including 91 courses of retreatments (1 cycle: 28 patients, 2 cycles: 14 patients, 3 cycles: 8 patients, 4 cycles: 1 patient, and 7 cycles: 1 patient). The median overall number of cycles per patient was 12 (range: 7–31). The median durations of the first, second, and third holidays were 18 weeks (6–60 weeks), 16 weeks (3–44 weeks), and 17 weeks (8–51 weeks), respectively. The median OSs were 22 months (10.5–70 months) after the first DOC treatment and 14 months (3–65 months) after the second DOC treatment. The > 50% PSA decline rate was 48% after retreatment. Short treatment holidays (< 3 months) were associated with shortened OS (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, a 25% PSA increase over the nadir was the strongest predictor of survival (HR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.47–6.99, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

DOC retreatment without prednisone had anti-tumor activity in a considerable proportion of mCRPC cases that were initially sensitive to first-line DOC. A 25% PSA increase over the nadir might predict acquired DOC resistance.

Influence of short-term dexamethasone on the efficacy of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Corticosteroids alone or in combination therapy are associated with favorable biochemical responses in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We speculated that the intermittent addition of dexamethasone may also enhance the antitumor effect of radioligand therapy (RLT) with ¹⁷⁷ Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with mCRPC were treated with 1 to 5 cycles of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0-7.4 GBq per cycle) at 6 to 8 weeks intervals. Based on the clinical decision (eg, in the case of vertebral metastases), 56% of patients received 4 mg of dexamethasone for the first 5 days of each cycle. Biochemical response rates, PSA decline and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed after one, three, and five cycles of RLT.

RESULTS

PSA response rates were not significantly different between patients receiving ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 plus dexamethasone and those receiving ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 alone after one, three, and five cycles (33% vs 39%, P = .62; 45% vs 45%, P = 1.0; and 38% vs 42%, P = .81). However, there was a nonsignificant trend for a more pronounced PSA decline in patients with bone metastases receiving adjunct dexamethasone (-21% ± 50% vs +11% ± 90%, P = .08; -21% ± 69% vs +22% ± 116%, P = .07; -13% ± 76% vs +32% ± 119%, P = .07). Median PFS tended to be longer in patients with bone metastases receiving ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 plus dexamethasone (146 vs 81 days; hazard ratio: 0.87 [95% confidence interval: 0.47-1.61]; P = .20). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (P = .0110), alkaline phosphatase levels (P = .0380) and adjunct dexamethasone (P = .0285) were independent predictors of changes in PSA in patients with bone metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed high response rates to ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in men with mCRPC. The short-term addition of dexamethasone to ¹⁷⁷ Lu-PSMA-617 had no striking antitumor effect but might enhance biochemical responses in patients with bone metastases. Future trials are warranted to test this hypothesis in a prospective setting.

Prostate cancer-specific hallmarks of amino acids metabolism: Towards a paradigm of precision medicine

So far multiple differences in prostate cancer-specific amino acids metabolism have been discovered. Moreover, attempts to utilize these alterations for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment have been made. The prostate cancer metabolism and biosynthesis of amino acids are particularly focused on anaplerosis more than on energy production. Other crucial requirements on amino acids pool come from the serine, one‑carbon cycle, glycine synthesis pathway and folate metabolism forming major sources of interproducts for synthesis of nucleobases necessary for rapidly proliferating cells. Considering the lack of some amino acids biosynthetic pathways and/or their extraordinary importance for prostate cancer cells, there is a widespread potential for targeted therapeutic applications with no effect on non-malignant cells. This review summarizes the up-to-date knowledge of the importance of amino acids for prostate cancer pathogenesis with a special emphasis on potential applications of metabolic variabilities in the new oncologic paradigm of precision medicine.

The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer

In attempt to improve long-term disease control outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer, numerous clinical trials have tested the addition of chemotherapy (CTX)-either adjuvant or neoadjuvant-to definitive local therapy, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Neoadjuvant trials generally confirm safety, feasibility, and pre-RP PSA reduction, but rates of pathologic complete response are rare, and no indications for neoadjuvant CTX have been firmly established. Adjuvant regimens have included CTX alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Here we provide a review of the relevant literature, and also quantify utilization of CTX in the definitive management of localized high-risk prostate cancer by querying the National Cancer Data Base. Between 2004 and 2013, 177 patients (of 29,659 total) treated with definitive RT, and 995 (of 367,570 total) treated with RP had CTX incorporated into their treatment regimens. Low numbers of RT + CTX patients precluded further analysis of this population, but we investigated the impact of CTX on overall survival (OS) for patients treated with RP +/- CTX. Disease-free survival or biochemical-recurrence-free survival are not available through the National Cancer Data Base. Propensity-score matching was conducted as patients treated with CTX were a higher-risk group. For nonmatched groups, OS at 5-years was 89.6% for the CTX group vs. 95.6%, for the no-CTX group (P < 0.01). The difference in OS between CTX and no-CTX groups did not persist after propensity-score matching, with 5-year OS 89.6% vs. 90.9%, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.99; P = 0.88). In summary, CTX was not shown to improve OS in this retrospective study. Multimodal regimens-such as RP followed by ADT, RT, and CTX; or RT in conjunction with ADT followed by CTX-have shown promise, but long-term follow-up of randomized data is required.

Cancer chemotherapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis: A convoluted connection

Chemotherapy is one of the most popular therapeutic strategies to treat cancer. However, cancer chemotherapeutics have often been associated with impairment of the immune system, which might consequently lead to an augmented risk of autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Though the accurate mechanistic facets of rheumatoid arthritis induction have not been interpreted yet, a conglomeration of genetic and environmental factors might promote its etiology. What makes the scenario more challenging is that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at a significantly elevated risk of developing various types of cancer. It is intriguing to note that diverse cancer chemotherapy drugs are also commonly used to treat symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. However, a colossal multitude of such cancer therapeutics has demonstrated highly varied results in rheumatoid arthritis patients, including both beneficial and adverse effects. Herein, we attempt to present a holistic account of the variegated modalities of this complex tripartite cross-talk between cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and chemotherapy drugs in order to decode the sinuous correlation between these two appalling pathological conditions.

Androgen receptor reverts dexamethasone‑induced inhibition of prostate cancer cell proliferation and migration

The aim of the present study was to determine the role of androgen receptor in the effect of dexamethasone on cell proliferation and migration of multiple prostate cancer cells. The prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, 22Rv1, C4-2 and PC3 were cultured in vitro. For glucocorticoid-induced experiments, the cells were transferred and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% charcoal-stripped serum from RPMI-1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum for at least 24 h. The effects of dexamethasone on the proliferation and migration of various cell lines were analyzed by MTT and migration assays. Dexamethasone exhibited no effect on LNCaP, C4-2 and 22Rv1 cell lines, but suppressed proliferation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)⁺ androgen receptor (AR)⁻ PC3 cell line. Dexamethasone suppressed PC3 cell migration, and did not affect migration of PC3-AR9 cells. Dexamethasone positively or negatively regulated proliferation of various prostate cancer cells based on AR and GR expression profiles. The data presented in the present study indicates that androgen receptor reverts the dexamethasone-induced inhibition of prostate cancer cell proliferation and migration.

Effect of Single-agent Daily Prednisone on Outcomes and Toxicities in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies

The clinical effect of prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. We performed a pooled analysis of control arms of randomized controlled trials that had or had not administered single-agent prednisone. Randomized controlled trials with a control arm that included single-agent placebo (or no anticancer therapy) or single-agent prednisone (with or without placebo) were eligible for analysis. Patients receiving prednisone combined with other agents in the control arm were excluded. The trial characteristics, baseline demographic data, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors response, and toxicities were recorded. The effect of prednisone was investigated for significance in bivariate models, adjusting for age, pre- and post-docetaxel status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and trial publication year. Eighteen trials were included; 9 had control arms that contained prednisone (n = 2831) and 9 did not (n = 2784). No significant differences were identified for OS or toxicities of any grade. A significantly greater PSA response rate (18.8% vs. 2.5%; P = .023) and a trend toward more frequent grade ≥ 3 fluid retention (1.0% vs. 0.4%; P = .097) was seen in the prednisone group. Prednisone was also significantly associated with PFS after adjusting for docetaxel status. Single-agent prednisone for mCRPC did not improve OS but was associated with a greater PSA response rate and PFS. Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicities were not significantly different with prednisone. With the exception of concurrent use with abiraterone or for palliative purposes, the routine use of prednisone for mCRPC appears unnecessary.

The Influence of Prednisone on the Efficacy of Cabazitaxel in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Background: Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane that is approved for use with concomitant low dose daily prednisone in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure. Since the role of daily corticosteroids in improving cabazitaxel efficacy or ameliorating its safety profile has not been adequately investigated so far, we compared outcomes of patients receiving cabazitaxel with or without daily corticosteroids in a retrospective single-Institution cohort of mCRPC patients.

Patients and methods: Medical records of deceased patients with documented mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel following prior docetaxel between January, 2011 and January, 2017 were reviewed at the single participating center. Patients who were receiving daily doses of systemic corticosteroids other than low dose daily prednisone or prednisolone (<= 10 mg a day) were excluded. The primary end point of this analysis was overall survival (OS). Secondary end-points were exposure to cabazitaxel as well as incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate prednisone use and other variables as potentially prognostic for overall survival.

Results: Overall, among 91 patients, 57 patients received cabazitaxel concurrently with low dose prednisone and 34 patients did not receive concurrent prednisone. The median overall survival of the population was 9.8 months (interquartile range, 9 to 14). Patients receiving prednisone had an overall survival of 9 months (interquartile range, 8 to 12) vs.14 months (interquartile range, 9.4 to 16.7) for patients not treated with prednisone. Approximately 45% of patients had a >30% PSA decline at 12 weeks. Prednisone use was not significantly prognostic for overall survival or PSA decline ≥30% rates on regression analyses. Importantly, a >30% PSA decline at 12, but not at 3, 6, 9 weeks, was prognostic for improved survival at multivariate analysis

Conclusions: The data presented here support the hypothesis that omitting daily corticosteroids in cabazitaxel-treated patients has no negative impact on either survival or safety profile. In the large prospective trial CABACARE, cabazitaxel-treated patients will be randomized to receive or not receive daily prednisone. The CABACARE (EudraCT n. 2016-003646-81) study is currently ongoing at University Federico II of Naples and at other multiple participating centers in Italy.

The effects of 1,4-dimethylpyridine in metastatic prostate cancer in mice

BACKGROUND

We previously showed that 1-methylnicotinamide (1-MNA) and its analog 1,4-dimethylpyridine (1,4-DMP) could inhibit the formation of lung metastases and enhance the efficacy of cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in the model of spontaneously metastasizing 4T1 mouse mammary gland tumors. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the previously observed activity of pyridine compounds pertains also to the prevention and the treatment of metastatic prostate tumors, in a combined chemotherapy with docetaxel.

METHODS

Cancer-preventing activity of 1,4-DMP was studied in the model of prostate tumors spontaneously arising in C57BL/6-Tg (TRAMP)8247Ng/J (TRAMP) mice. The efficacy of the combined chemotherapy, comprising simultaneous use of 1,4-DMP and docetaxel, was evaluated in the orthotopic mouse model of human PC-3M-luc2 prostate cancer. The toxicity of the applied treatment was also determined.

RESULTS

The development of prostate tumors in TRAMP mice remained unaffected after administration of 1,4-DMP. Similarly, no effect of 1,4-DMP was found on the growth of orthotopically transplanted PC-3M-luc2 tumors. However, when 1,4-DMP was administered along with docetaxel, it enhanced the anticancer activity of the chemotherapy. As a result, in PC-3M-luc2-bearing mice statistically significant inhibition of the tumor growth and lower metastases incidence were observed. The decreased metastatic yield is probably related to the diminished platelet activity observed in mice treated with combined therapeutic regimen. Finally, the combined treatment exhibited lowered side effects accompanying docetaxel administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Results presented herein confirm previously published data on the anticancer activity of pyridine compounds and demonstrate that 1,4-DMP may be beneficially implemented into chemotherapy utilizing various cytotoxic agents, directed against multiple metastatic tumor types.

Chemotherapy options in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction:

The treatment landscape for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is evolving, with recent approvals of immune therapy, novel hormonal therapy, and bone-targeted therapy. Chemotherapy remains an essential component of the armamentarium. Herein, we review current chemotherapy options for patients with CRPC and discuss future challenges.

Methods:

We reviewed literature for chemotherapy agents in prostate cancer, with special attention to the evidence for efficacy of the currently approved agents. We also reviewed emerging data on biomarkers of response to chemotherapy for CRPC.

Results:

Taxanes, especially docetaxel and cabazitaxel, have first- and second-line indications for CRPC, respectively, with both providing a survival benefit. Multiple attempts to improve on the single agent efficacy of docetaxel with combination therapy have not generally been successful although platinum combinations are used for resistant phenotypes. Reductions in prostate-specific antigen by ≥30% and reductions in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to ≤ 5 are associated with improved survival on chemotherapy. Chemotherapy may continue to be effective therapy for patients with biomarkers that are associated with resistance to androgen-directed therapies (androgen receptor splice variant 7 positivity in CTCs or high CTC heterogeneity).

Conclusions:

Chemotherapy remains an essential component of CRPC therapy, and biomarkers are being identified to define clinical scenarios where chemotherapy may be the optimal therapy choice.