1
|
Handa S, Isaacs KK, Wall JT, Larger A, Burns S, Koval LE, Baron-Furuyama K, Elonen CM, Lyons D, Dionisio KL, Horton MB, Phillips KA. The Chemical and Products Database v4.0, an updated resource supporting chemical exposure evaluations. Sci Data 2025; 12:950. [PMID: 40481042 PMCID: PMC12144101 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-05240-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2025] [Indexed: 06/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Since the initial release of the Chemical and Products Database (CPDat) in 2018, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has added a considerable amount of chemical exposure-related information to the database and has expanded its schema to accommodate new types of data. This data descriptor provides information regarding the structure and types of data contained within CPDat (both existing and new), new controlled vocabularies implemented to harmonize terminology across the different data types, application of a rigorous data curation and quality assurance tracking system, and various methods of accessing CPDat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Handa
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristin K Isaacs
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan T Wall
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison Larger
- General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Scott Burns
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center of Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Lauren E Koval
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kenta Baron-Furuyama
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Colleen M Elonen
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Lyons
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kathie L Dionisio
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - M Beth Horton
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Katherine A Phillips
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsieh NH, Kwok ESC. Biomonitoring-Based Risk Assessment of Pyrethroid Exposure in the U.S. Population: Application of High-Throughput and Physiologically Based Kinetic Models. TOXICS 2025; 13:216. [PMID: 40137543 PMCID: PMC11945574 DOI: 10.3390/toxics13030216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2025] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
Pyrethroid insecticides have been extensively utilized in agriculture and residential areas in the United States. This study evaluated the exposure risk by age using available biomonitoring data. We analyzed pyrethroid metabolite concentrations in urine using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. Reverse dosimetry was conducted with a high-throughput model and a physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model integrated with a Bayesian inference framework. We further derived Benchmark Dose (BMD) values and systemic points of departure in rats using Bayesian BMD and PBK models. Margins of exposure (MOE) were calculated to assess neurotoxic risk based on estimated daily oral intake and dose metrics in plasma and brain. Results from both models indicated that young children have higher pyrethroid exposure compared to other age groups. All estimated risk values were within acceptable levels of acute neurotoxic effect. Additionally, MOEs calculated from oral doses were lower than those derived from internal doses, highlighting that traditional external exposure assessments tend to overestimate risk compared to advanced internal dose-based techniques. In conclusion, combining high-throughput and PBK approaches enhances the understanding of human health risks associated with pyrethroid exposures, demonstrating their potential for future applications in exposure tracking and health risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan-Hung Hsieh
- Human Exposure & Health Effects Modeling Section, Human Health Assessment Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang L, Du J, Wu X, Gan Z. Assessing the impact of volatile organic compounds on cardiovascular health: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2020. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 2025; 293:118050. [PMID: 40101592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are environmental pollutants that may negatively impact cardiovascular health. This study investigates the association between VOC mixtures, measured through urinary VOC metabolites (VOCMs), and cardiovascular health using Life's Essential 8 (LE8) scores. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2020 were analyzed for 2967 adults aged 20-79 years. Multiple statistical methods, including correlation analysis, variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis, quantile g-computation (q-gcomp), and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), were applied to assess the association between VOCMs and LE8 scores. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with different random seeds and subsampling techniques to confirm robustness. Correlation and VIF analyses revealed strong collinearity among VOCMs, highlighting the need for advanced models. Survey-weighted regression indicated that lower VOC exposure was associated with better cardiovascular health. Q-gcomp identified both positive and negative associations between individual VOCMs and LE8 scores, with some unexpected positive associations. BKMR highlighted the complex mixture effects of VOCMs on cardiovascular health. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of these findings. This study underscores the intricate relationship between VOC exposure and cardiovascular health and the necessity of advanced statistical methods for mixture analysis. Despite some unexpected findings, the results suggest that VOC exposure, as reflected by urinary VOCMs, is associated with adverse cardiovascular health outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify the biological mechanisms and implications of these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Wang
- Department of Neurology, Xi'an No.9 Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710052, China; Translational Medicine Center, Xi'an No.9 Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710052, China.
| | - Jianqiang Du
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
| | - Xiaoming Wu
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
| | - Zhenhai Gan
- The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rager JE, Koval LE, Hickman E, Ring C, Teitelbaum T, Cohen T, Fragola G, Zylka MJ, Engel LS, Lu K, Engel SM. The environmental neuroactive chemicals list of prioritized substances for human biomonitoring and neurotoxicity testing: A database and high-throughput toxicokinetics approach. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2025; 266:120537. [PMID: 39638029 PMCID: PMC11753932 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
There is a diversity of chemicals to which humans are potentially exposed. Few of these chemicals have linked human biomonitoring data, and most have very limited neurotoxicity testing. Of particular concern are environmental exposures impacting children, who constitute a population of heightened susceptibility due to rapid neural growth and plasticity, yet lack biomonitoring data compared to other age/population subgroups. This study set out to develop a prioritized list of neuroactive substances, titled the Environmental NeuRoactIve CHemicals (ENRICH) list, to be used as a defined screening library in the evaluation of human biological samples, with emphasis on early childhood-relevant environmental exposures. In silico database mining approaches were used to prioritize chemicals based upon likelihood of neuroactivity, human exposure, and feasible detection in biological samples. Evidence of neuroactivity was compiled across in vitro high-throughput screening, animal testing, and/or human epidemiological findings. Chemicals were considered for their likelihood of human exposure and detection presence in biological samples (including metabolites), with additional evidence indicating presence within child-relevant products. The resulting list of 1827 chemicals were ranked using a Chemical Prioritization Index. Manual inclusion/exclusion criteria were employed for the top-ranking chemical candidates to ensure that chemicals were within the study's scope (i.e., environmentally relevant) and, for the purposes of biomonitoring, had properties amenable to mass spectrometry methods. These elements were combined to produce the ENRICH list of 250 top-ranking chemicals, spanning pesticides and those used in home maintenance, personal care, cleaning products, vehicles, arts and crafts, and consumer electronics, among other sources. Chemicals were additionally evaluated for high-throughput toxicokinetics to predict how much of a chemical and/or its metabolite(s) may reach urine, as an example biological matrix for practical use in biomonitoring efforts. This novel study couples databases and in silico-based predictions to prioritize chemicals in the environment with potential neurological impacts for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Lauren E Koval
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Elise Hickman
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Center for Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Caroline Ring
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Drop D143-02, PO Box 12055, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA
| | - Taylor Teitelbaum
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Todd Cohen
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Giulia Fragola
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115 Mason Farm Road, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark J Zylka
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, CB #7545, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7250, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence S Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Kun Lu
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA; Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Drive, CB #7325, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Stephanie M Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watson WD, Janssen JA, Hartnett MJ, Isaacs KK, Liu X, Yau AY, Favela KA, Wambaugh JF. Discerning Emittable from Extractable Chemicals Identified in Consumer Products by Suspect Screening GCxGC-TOFMS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:21669-21679. [PMID: 39601231 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Characterization of chemicals in household products is important for understanding this potential source of chemical exposure. Increasingly, suspect screening and nontargeted analysis techniques are used to characterize as many chemical signatures as possible. Solids such as household products are most conveniently prepared using solvent extraction, revealing what chemicals are contained within the product matrix but providing no information about the potential of those chemicals to leave the matrix and cause actual exposure. In this work, the profile and relative abundances of "extractable" chemical signatures found after solvent extraction are compared to those "emittable" to the headspace for 81 household products analyzed by two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. This study retrospectively fuses data collected in separate efforts over 3.8 years and 13 analytical batches. Management of the data is made possible by recent developments in processing systems for complex data such as Highlight. Compounds were generically classified as aromatic heteroatom, aromatic hydrocarbon, glycol, hydrocarbon, long chain heteroatom, nonaromatic heteroatom, and unknown/unclassified. Class-based retention time and abundance trends were observed. Liquid extraction resulted in the greatest number of features and the highest relative abundances, while low temperature emission conditions produced the smallest number of features and lowest relative abundances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Watson
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Jake A Janssen
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | | | - Kristin K Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Xiaoyu Liu
- Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Alice Y Yau
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - Kristin A Favela
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
| | - John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Werthmann DW, Rabito FA, Adamkiewicz G, Reponen T, Calafat AM, Ospina M, Chew GL. Pesticide exposure and asthma morbidity in children residing in urban, multi-family housing. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2024; 34:241-250. [PMID: 36765101 PMCID: PMC10412724 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-023-00524-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children are potentially more susceptible to the adverse effects of pesticides due to more sensitive organ systems and lower capacity to metabolize and eliminate chemicals compared to adults. The health risks are particularly concerning children with asthma, living in low-income neighborhoods in multi-family housing because of their impaired respiratory health, and factors associated with low-income, multi-family environments. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between pesticide exposure and asthma morbidity among children 7-12 years residing in low-income, multi-family housing. METHODS The concentrations of seven urinary pesticide biomarkers: 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy), 2-isopropyl-4-methyl-6-hydroxypyrimidine, para-nitrophenol (PNP), 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA), 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid, trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) were measured. Children (n = 162) were followed for one year with three measures of pesticides biomarkers. Associations between individual biomarkers and asthma attack, asthma related health care utilization, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), adjusting for demographic and household factors were examined with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression was used to examine the effect of pesticide mixture on asthma attacks and asthma-related health care utilization (HCU). RESULTS In adjusted GEE models, positive non-significant associations were found between PNP and HCU (adjusted Odds Ratio(aOR):2.05 95% CI:0.76-5.52) and null associations for 3-PBA and HCU (aOR:1.07 95% CI: 0.88-1.29). Higher concentrations of PNP and 2,4-D were associated with significantly lower FeNO levels (PNP: -17.4%; 2,4-D:-19.74%). The mixture was positively associated with HCU in unadjusted (OR: 1.56 97.5% CI: 1.08-2.27) but not significant in adjusted models (aOR: 1.40 97.5% CI: .86-2.29). The non-specific pyrethroid biomarker 3-PBA at baseline contributed the greatest weight to the index (45%). SIGNIFICANCE There were non-significant associations between pesticide biomarkers and respiratory outcomes in children with asthma. There was a suggestive association between urinary pesticide biomarkers and HCU. Further studies with larger sample sizes could help to confirm these findings. IMPACT STATEMENT Pesticide exposure among children in the urban environment is ubiquitous and there is a dearth of information on the impact of low-level chronic exposure in vulnerable populations. This study suggested that pesticide exposure at concentrations below the national average may not affect asthma morbidity in children. However, different biomarkers of pesticides showed different effects, but the mixture suggested increasing pesticide exposure results in asthma related HCU. The results may show that children with asthma may be at risk for negative health outcomes due to pesticides and the need to further examine this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Werthmann
- Tulane University, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Felicia A Rabito
- Tulane University, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Tiina Reponen
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Antonia M Calafat
- Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maria Ospina
- Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ginger L Chew
- Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reale E, Zare Jeddi M, Paini A, Connolly A, Duca R, Cubadda F, Benfenati E, Bessems J, S Galea K, Dirven H, Santonen T, M Koch H, Jones K, Sams C, Viegas S, Kyriaki M, Campisi L, David A, Antignac JP, B Hopf N. Human biomonitoring and toxicokinetics as key building blocks for next generation risk assessment. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2024; 184:108474. [PMID: 38350256 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Human health risk assessment is historically built upon animal testing, often following Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines and exposure assessments. Using combinations of human relevant in vitro models, chemical analysis and computational (in silico) approaches bring advantages compared to animal studies. These include a greater focus on the human species and on molecular mechanisms and kinetics, identification of Adverse Outcome Pathways and downstream Key Events as well as the possibility of addressing susceptible populations and additional endpoints. Much of the advancement and progress made in the Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) have been primarily focused on new approach methodologies (NAMs) and physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling without incorporating human biomonitoring (HBM). The integration of toxicokinetics (TK) and PBK modelling is an essential component of NGRA. PBK models are essential for describing in quantitative terms the TK processes with a focus on the effective dose at the expected target site. Furthermore, the need for PBK models is amplified by the increasing scientific and regulatory interest in aggregate and cumulative exposure as well as interactions of chemicals in mixtures. Since incorporating HBM data strengthens approaches and reduces uncertainties in risk assessment, here we elaborate on the integrated use of TK, PBK modelling and HBM in chemical risk assessment highlighting opportunities as well as challenges and limitations. Examples are provided where HBM and TK/PBK modelling can be used in both exposure assessment and hazard characterization shifting from external exposure and animal dose/response assays to animal-free, internal exposure-based NGRA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Reale
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maryam Zare Jeddi
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands
| | | | - Alison Connolly
- UCD Centre for Safety & Health at Work, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8, Dublin, Ireland for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, Physics, School of Natural Science and the Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway H91 CF50, Ireland
| | - Radu Duca
- Unit Environmental Hygiene and Human Biological Monitoring, Department of Health Protection, Laboratoire national de santé (LNS), 1, Rue Louis Rech, 3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg; Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesco Cubadda
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità - National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Benfenati
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milano, Italy
| | - Jos Bessems
- VITO HEALTH, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, 2400 Mol, Belgium
| | - Karen S Galea
- Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
| | - Hubert Dirven
- Department of Climate and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiina Santonen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), P.O. Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland
| | - Holger M Koch
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany
| | - Kate Jones
- HSE - Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK
| | - Craig Sams
- HSE - Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK
| | - Susana Viegas
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Machera Kyriaki
- Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8, Stephanou Delta Street, 14561 Kifissia, Athens, Greece
| | - Luca Campisi
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy; Flashpoint srl, Via Norvegia 56, 56021 Cascina (PI), Italy
| | - Arthur David
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Nancy B Hopf
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stanfield Z, Setzer RW, Hull V, Sayre RR, Isaacs KK, Wambaugh JF. Characterizing Chemical Exposure Trends from NHANES Urinary Biomonitoring Data. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2024; 132:17009. [PMID: 38285237 PMCID: PMC10824265 DOI: 10.1289/ehp12188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xenobiotic metabolites are widely present in human urine and can indicate recent exposure to environmental chemicals. Proper inference of which chemicals contribute to these metabolites can inform human exposure and risk. Furthermore, longitudinal biomonitoring studies provide insight into how chemical exposures change over time. OBJECTIVES We constructed an exposure landscape for as many human-exposure relevant chemicals over as large a time span as possible to characterize exposure trends across demographic groups and chemical types. METHODS We analyzed urine data of nine 2-y cohorts (1999-2016) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Chemical daily intake rates (in milligrams per kilogram bodyweight per day) were inferred, using the R package bayesmarker, from metabolite concentrations in each cohort individually to identify exposure trends. Trends for metabolites and parents were clustered to find chemicals with similar exposure patterns. Exposure variation by age, gender, and body mass index were also assessed. RESULTS Intake rates for 179 parent chemicals were inferred from 151 metabolites (96 measured in five or more cohorts). Seventeen metabolites and 44 parent chemicals exhibited fold-changes ≥ 10 between any two cohorts (deltamethrin, di-n -octyl phthalate, and di-isononyl phthalate had the greatest exposure increases). Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate intake began decreasing in 2007, whereas both di-isobutyl and di-isononyl phthalate began increasing shortly before. Intake for four parabens was markedly higher in females, especially reproductive-age females, compared with males and children. Cadmium and arsenobetaine exhibited higher exposure for individuals > 65 years of age and lower for individuals < 20 years of age. DISCUSSION With appropriate analysis, NHANES indicates trends in chemical exposures over the past two decades. Decreases in exposure are observable as the result of regulatory action, with some being accompanied by increases in replacement chemicals. Age- and gender-specific variations in exposure were observed for multiple chemicals. Continued estimation of demographic-specific exposures is needed to both monitor and identify potential vulnerable populations. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12188.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Stanfield
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - R. Woodrow Setzer
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Victoria Hull
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Risa R. Sayre
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kristin K. Isaacs
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - John F. Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Milton SG, Tejiram RA, Joglekar R, Hoffman K. Characterizing the Contribution of Indoor Residential Phthalate and Phthalate Alternative Dust Concentrations to Internal Dose in the US General Population: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6589. [PMID: 37623174 PMCID: PMC10454216 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Diet is the primary exposure pathway for phthalates, but relative contributions of other exposure sources are not well characterized. This study quantifies the relative contribution of indoor residential dust phthalate and phthalate alternative concentrations to total internal dose estimated from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) urinary metabolite concentrations. Specifically, median phthalate and phthalate alternative concentrations measured in residential dust were determined by updating a pre-existing systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2015 and the attributable internal dose was estimated using intake and reverse dosimetry models. Employing a predetermined search strategy, 12 studies published between January 2000 and April 2022 from Web of Science and PubMed measuring phthalates and phthalate alternatives in residential dust were identified. From the data extracted, it was estimated that dust contributed more significantly to the internal dose of low-molecular weight chemicals such as DEP and BBP when compared to high-molecular weight chemicals such as DEHTP. Additionally, findings showed that the chemical profile of residential dust is changing temporally with more phthalate alternatives being detected in the indoor environment. Future studies should seek to characterize the contribution of dust to an overall phthalate and phthalate alternative intake for individuals who have higher than normal exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sashoy G. Milton
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Rachel A. Tejiram
- Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rashmi Joglekar
- Earthjustice, Toxic Exposure and Health Program, Washington, DC 20001, USA
| | - Kate Hoffman
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gois MFB, Fernández-Pato A, Huss A, Gacesa R, Wijmenga C, Weersma RK, Fu J, Vermeulen RCH, Zhernakova A, Lenters VC, Kurilshikov A. Impact of occupational pesticide exposure on the human gut microbiome. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1223120. [PMID: 37637104 PMCID: PMC10448898 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1223120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The rising use of pesticides in modern agriculture has led to a shift in disease burden in which exposure to these chemicals plays an increasingly important role. The human gut microbiome, which is partially responsible for the biotransformation of xenobiotics, is also known to promote biotransformation of environmental pollutants. Understanding the effects of occupational pesticide exposure on the gut microbiome can thus provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying the impact of pesticide exposure on health. Here we investigate the impact of occupational pesticide exposure on human gut microbiome composition in 7198 participants from the Dutch Microbiome Project of the Lifelines Study. We used job-exposure matrices in combination with occupational codes to retrieve categorical and cumulative estimates of occupational exposures to general pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. Approximately 4% of our cohort was occupationally exposed to at least one class of pesticides, with predominant exposure to multiple pesticide classes. Most participants reported long-term employment, suggesting a cumulative profile of exposure. We demonstrate that contact with insecticides, fungicides and a general "all pesticides" class was consistently associated with changes in the gut microbiome, showing significant associations with decreased alpha diversity and a differing beta diversity. We also report changes in the abundance of 39 different bacterial taxa upon exposure to the different pesticide classes included in this study. Together, the extent of statistically relevant associations between gut microbial changes and pesticide exposure in our findings highlights the impact of these compounds on the human gut microbiome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milla F. Brandao Gois
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Asier Fernández-Pato
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anke Huss
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ranko Gacesa
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Cisca Wijmenga
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rinse K. Weersma
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jingyuan Fu
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Roel C. H. Vermeulen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Zhernakova
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Virissa C. Lenters
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alexander Kurilshikov
- Department of Genetics and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buckley TJ, Egeghy PP, Isaacs K, Richard AM, Ring C, Sayre RR, Sobus JR, Thomas RS, Ulrich EM, Wambaugh JF, Williams AJ. Cutting-edge computational chemical exposure research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 178:108097. [PMID: 37478680 PMCID: PMC10588682 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Exposure science is evolving from its traditional "after the fact" and "one chemical at a time" approach to forecasting chemical exposures rapidly enough to keep pace with the constantly expanding landscape of chemicals and exposures. In this article, we provide an overview of the approaches, accomplishments, and plans for advancing computational exposure science within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development (EPA/ORD). First, to characterize the universe of chemicals in commerce and the environment, a carefully curated, web-accessible chemical resource has been created. This DSSTox database unambiguously identifies >1.2 million unique substances reflecting potential environmental and human exposures and includes computationally accessible links to each compound's corresponding data resources. Next, EPA is developing, applying, and evaluating predictive exposure models. These models increasingly rely on data, computational tools like quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models, and machine learning/artificial intelligence to provide timely and efficient prediction of chemical exposure (and associated uncertainty) for thousands of chemicals at a time. Integral to this modeling effort, EPA is developing data resources across the exposure continuum that includes application of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods providing measurement capability at scale with the number of chemicals in commerce. These research efforts are integrated and well-tailored to support population exposure assessment to prioritize chemicals for exposure as a critical input to risk management. In addition, the exposure forecasts will allow a wide variety of stakeholders to explore sustainable initiatives like green chemistry to achieve economic, social, and environmental prosperity and protection of future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Buckley
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States.
| | - Peter P Egeghy
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Kristin Isaacs
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Ann M Richard
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Caroline Ring
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Risa R Sayre
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Jon R Sobus
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Russell S Thomas
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Elin M Ulrich
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - John F Wambaugh
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| | - Antony J Williams
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure (CCTE), 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyce M, Favela KA, Bonzo JA, Chao A, Lizarraga LE, Moody LR, Owens EO, Patlewicz G, Shah I, Sobus JR, Thomas RS, Williams AJ, Yau A, Wambaugh JF. Identifying xenobiotic metabolites with in silico prediction tools and LCMS suspect screening analysis. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY 2023; 5:1051483. [PMID: 36742129 PMCID: PMC9889941 DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1051483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the metabolic fate of a xenobiotic substance can help inform its potential health risks and allow for the identification of signature metabolites associated with exposure. The need to characterize metabolites of poorly studied or novel substances has shifted exposure studies towards non-targeted analysis (NTA), which often aims to profile many compounds within a sample using high-resolution liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry (LCMS). Here we evaluate the suitability of suspect screening analysis (SSA) liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry to inform xenobiotic chemical metabolism. Given a lack of knowledge of true metabolites for most chemicals, predictive tools were used to generate potential metabolites as suspect screening lists to guide the identification of selected xenobiotic substances and their associated metabolites. Thirty-three substances were selected to represent a diverse array of pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and industrial chemicals from Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast chemical library. The compounds were incubated in a metabolically-active in vitro assay using primary hepatocytes and the resulting supernatant and lysate fractions were analyzed with high-resolution LCMS. Metabolites were simulated for each compound structure using software and then combined to serve as the suspect screening list. The exact masses of the predicted metabolites were then used to select LCMS features for fragmentation via tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Of the starting chemicals, 12 were measured in at least one sample in either positive or negative ion mode and a subset of these were used to develop the analysis workflow. We implemented a screening level workflow for background subtraction and the incorporation of time-varying kinetics into the identification of likely metabolites. We used haloperidol as a case study to perform an in-depth analysis, which resulted in identifying five known metabolites and five molecular features that represent potential novel metabolites, two of which were assigned discrete structures based on in silico predictions. This workflow was applied to five additional test chemicals, and 15 molecular features were selected as either reported metabolites, predicted metabolites, or potential metabolites without a structural assignment. This study demonstrates that in some-but not all-cases, suspect screening analysis methods provide a means to rapidly identify and characterize metabolites of xenobiotic chemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Boyce
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | - Jessica A. Bonzo
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Alex Chao
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Lucina E. Lizarraga
- Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Laura R. Moody
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth O. Owens
- Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Grace Patlewicz
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jon R. Sobus
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Russell S. Thomas
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Antony J. Williams
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alice Yau
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - John F. Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States,*Correspondence: John F. Wambaugh,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wambaugh JF, Rager JE. Exposure forecasting - ExpoCast - for data-poor chemicals in commerce and the environment. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 32:783-793. [PMID: 36347934 PMCID: PMC9742338 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00492-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Estimates of exposure are critical to prioritize and assess chemicals based on risk posed to public health and the environment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for regulating thousands of chemicals in commerce and the environment for which exposure data are limited. Since 2009 the EPA's ExpoCast ("Exposure Forecasting") project has sought to develop the data, tools, and evaluation approaches required to generate rapid and scientifically defensible exposure predictions for the full universe of existing and proposed commercial chemicals. This review article aims to summarize issues in exposure science that have been addressed through initiatives affiliated with ExpoCast. ExpoCast research has generally focused on chemical exposure as a statistical systems problem intended to inform thousands of chemicals. The project exists as a companion to EPA's ToxCast ("Toxicity Forecasting") project which has used in vitro high-throughput screening technologies to characterize potential hazard posed by thousands of chemicals for which there are limited toxicity data. Rapid prediction of chemical exposures and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of ToxCast data allow for prioritization based upon risk of adverse outcomes due to environmental chemical exposure. ExpoCast has developed (1) integrated modeling approaches to reliably predict exposure and IVIVE dose, (2) highly efficient screening tools for chemical prioritization, (3) efficient and affordable tools for generating new exposure and dose data, and (4) easily accessible exposure databases. The development of new exposure models and databases along with the application of technologies like non-targeted analysis and machine learning have transformed exposure science for data-poor chemicals. By developing high-throughput tools for chemical exposure analytics and translating those tools into public health decisions ExpoCast research has served as a crucible for identifying and addressing exposure science knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
- Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Julia E Rager
- Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hubbard HF, Ring CL, Hong T, Henning CC, Vallero DA, Egeghy PP, Goldsmith MR. Exposure Prioritization ( Ex Priori): A Screening-Level High-Throughput Chemical Prioritization Tool. TOXICS 2022; 10:569. [PMID: 36287849 PMCID: PMC9609548 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
To estimate potential chemical risk, tools are needed to prioritize potential exposures for chemicals with minimal data. Consumer product exposures are a key pathway, and variability in consumer use patterns is an important factor. We designed Ex Priori, a flexible dashboard-type screening-level exposure model, to rapidly visualize exposure rankings from consumer product use. Ex Priori is Excel-based. Currently, it is parameterized for seven routes of exposure for 1108 chemicals present in 228 consumer product types. It includes toxicokinetics considerations to estimate body burden. It includes a simple framework for rapid modeling of broad changes in consumer use patterns by product category. Ex Priori rapidly models changes in consumer user patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic and instantly shows resulting changes in chemical exposure rankings by body burden. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the model is sensitive to the air emissions rate of chemicals from products. Ex Priori's simple dashboard facilitates dynamic exploration of the effects of varying consumer product use patterns on prioritization of chemicals based on potential exposures. Ex Priori can be a useful modeling and visualization tool to both novice and experienced exposure modelers and complement more computationally intensive population-based exposure models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline L. Ring
- Chemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Tao Hong
- ICF International, 2635 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Cara C. Henning
- ICF International, 2635 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Daniel A. Vallero
- Chemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Peter P. Egeghy
- Chemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| | - Michael-Rock Goldsmith
- Chemical Characterization and Exposure Division, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27713, USA
| |
Collapse
|