Challenges and opportunities for improving access to approved neonatal drugs and devices

Review of Precision Medicine and Diagnosis of Neonatal Illness

Background/Objectives: Precision medicine is a state-of-the-art medicine tactic that tailors information about people's genes, environment, and lifestyle to aid the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of various diseases to provide an overview of the currently available knowledge and applicability of precision medicine in the diagnosis of different cases admitted to the NICU, such as encephalopathies, respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity, hemodynamic instability, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and hyperbilirubinemia. Methods: The authors searched databases, such as PubMed and PubMed Central, for the terms neonatal "precision medicine", "personalized medicine", "genomics", and "metabolomics", all related to precision medicine in the diagnosis of neonatal illness. The related studies were collected. Results: The review highlights the diagnostic approach that serves to implement precision medicine in the NICU and provide precision diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Conclusions: In this review, we projected several diagnostic approaches that provide precision identification of health problems among sick neonates with complex illnesses in the NICU; some are noninvasive and available in ordinary healthcare settings, while others are invasive or not feasible or still in ongoing research as machine learning algorithms. Future studies are needed for the wide implementation of artificial intelligence tools in the diagnosis of neonatal illnesses.

Safety reporting in neonatal clinical trials: reflections towards optimal, globally relevant approaches

Adverse event (AE) collection is a key part of evidence generation in clinical trials and an integral element of safety reporting. AE assessment and documentation is particularly challenging in neonates who are a heterogeneous population with high rates of co-morbidities. Neonatal research is finally gaining the attention of regulators regarding drug development and the need for optimal dosing specific to this population. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that adverse events (AEs) are adequately collected, allowing for the generation of essential safety data. It is also crucial that the methodology used aligns with the intended trial outcomes to minimise the burden on trial sites. In resource-constrained settings, where pharmacovigilance implementation can be particularly challenging, a pragmatic approach to safety reporting is even more important given the significant public health need for effective drugs. This commentary reflects on some of the challenges and potential areas of improvement in safety reporting that could be addressed in future neonatal-focused trials.

Breaking the silence: challenges and opportunities in pediatric drug development

Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. Despite significant advances in adult drug development, children remain underserved due to their unique physiological needs and difficulties conducting clinical trials. Current pediatric therapeutic options are limited, off-label, and lack evidence from well-controlled trials. Incorporating global regulatory frameworks can provide valuable insights when addressing these challenges. The disparity in investment is evident as several pharmaceutical companies have recently closed their pediatric drug centers with plans to focus on more profitable adult markets, leaving pediatric research underprioritized. This article discusses the root causes of this imbalance and potential solutions including: 1) the use of emerging technologies - artificial intelligence, modeling, and simulation; 2) leveraging innovative trial designs, 3) the use of real-world data, 4) the need for public-private partnerships to drive progress in pediatric drug development; and 5) advocacy groups to shape policies and investments. By focusing on enhancing regulatory incentives, encouraging long-term industry commitment, and engaging patient advocacy groups, a more sustainable pipeline can be established. This call to action underscores the moral imperative of prioritizing pediatric health and fostering innovation to improve outcomes for vulnerable pediatric populations and shape a healthier future for all children. IMPACT: Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. The most important causes include the absence of robust advocacy, regulatory hurdles, and economic disincentives. Potential solutions involve leveraging innovative trial designs, the use of real-world data, and public-private partnerships.

Advocating for drug development in newborn infants

Neonatal care needs more robust guidance on pharmacotherapy, (formulation, dosage regimen, safety and efficacy information). This requires structured advocacy. We therefore discuss advocacy related to improving information about medicines including current practices, clinical trials, the current setting, and trial preparedness. This steps can improve neonatal drug development by generating evidence, particularly if a programmatic approach (identify dosing, eligibility criteria, and outcomes) to evidence generation is followed. Trial design should be guided by the intended use of the medicine and the benefits/risks that the study participant is exposed to. Regulatory trials (explanatory, controlled environment, internal validity, endpoints reflect clinically important outcomes, strong causal evidence) are sometimes necessary. However, some research questions are best addressed with informative trials. In either case, trial design can be supported by real world data and evidence, extrapolation from other subpopulations, or physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling. Data management, safety reporting, and management of drugs should be specified and proportionate. Trial design and conduct also necessitate awareness of Good Clinical Practice specific to neonates. Relevant aspects include protocol and trial design, research skills and interactions with Ethics Committees or Institutional Research Boards, capacities and competences needed within the research team, and aspects related to consent and recruitment.

Parental impact during and after neonatal intensive care admission

Parents play a pivotal role in neurodevelopmental outcomes of their children in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and beyond. Integration of parents in clinical care and research is synergistic. Engaged parents yield more comprehensive clinical care and more robust and meaningful research products. Subsequently, successful clinical and research efforts improve outcomes for children. We review strategies for parental integration into NICU clinical care and research, including parental involvement in therapeutic interventions and neurodevelopmental care, and effective communication strategies for clinicians and researchers. We discuss challenges in neonatal trials and emphasize the need for building a culture of research, collaborative partnerships with patient advocacy organizations, and ongoing support beyond the NICU. Overall, we call for recognizing and fostering the impactful role of parents as teammates with clinicians and researchers in optimizing neurodevelopmental outcomes in the NICU and beyond.

Antibiotics, Analgesic Sedatives, and Antiseizure Medications Frequently Used in Critically Ill Neonates: A Narrative Review

Antibiotic, analgesic sedative, and antiseizure medications are among the most commonly used medications in preterm/sick neonates, who are at high risk of nosocomial infections, central nervous system complications, and are exposed to numerous painful/stressful procedures. These severe and potentially life-threatening complications may have serious short- and long-term consequences and should be prevented and/or promptly treated. The reported variability in the medications used in neonates indicates the lack of adequate neonatal studies regarding their effectiveness and safety. Important obstacles contributing to inadequate studies in preterm/sick infants include difficulties in obtaining parental consent, physicians' unwillingness to recruit preterm infants, the off-label use of many medications in neonates, and other scientific and ethical concerns. This review is an update on the use of antimicrobials (antifungals), analgesics (sedatives), and antiseizure medications in neonates, focusing on current evidence or knowledge gaps regarding their pharmacokinetics, indications, safety, dosage, and evidence-based guidelines for their optimal use in neonates. We also address the effects of early antibiotic use on the intestinal microbiome and its association with long-term immune-related diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopment (ND). Recommendations for empirical treatment and the emergence of pathogen resistance to antimicrobials and antifungals are also presented. Finally, future perspectives on the prevention, modification, or reversal of antibiotic resistance are discussed.

Public health relevance of medicines developed under paediatric legislation in Europe and the USA: a systematic mapping study

BACKGROUND

Legislation in the European Union (EU) and the USA promoting the development of paediatric medicines has contributed to new treatments for children. This study explores how such legislation responds to paediatric health needs in different country settings and globally, and whether it should be considered for wider implementation.

METHODS

We searched EU and US regulatory databases for medicines with approved indications resulting from completed paediatric development between 2007 and 2018. Of 195 medicines identified, 187 could be systematically mapped to the burden of the target disease for six study countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Kenya, Russia, South Africa) and globally, using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). All medicines were also screened for inclusion on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) and the EML for children under 13 years (EMLc).

RESULTS

The studied medicines were disproportionately focused on non-communicable diseases, which represented 68% of medicines and 21% of global paediatric DALYs. On the other hand, we found 28% of medicines for communicable, maternal, neonatal and nutritional disorders, representing 73% of global paediatric DALYs. Neonatal disorders and malaria were mapped with two medicines, tuberculosis and neglected tropical diseases with none. The gap between medicines and paediatric DALYs was greater in countries with lower income. Still, 34% of medicines are included in the EMLc and 48% in the EML.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric policies in the EU and the USA are only partially responsive to paediatric health needs. To be considered for wider implementation, paediatric incentives and obligations should be more targeted towards paediatric health needs. International harmonisation of legislation and alignment with global research priorities could further strengthen its impact on child health and support ongoing efforts to improve access to medicines. Furthermore, efforts should be made to ensure global access to authorised paediatric medicines.

Positive end-expiratory pressure and surfactant administration mode influence function in ex-vivo premature sheep lungs

AIM

Respiratory distress syndrome often necessitates endotracheal surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants. Our study aimed to explore a multi-modal simulation tool for investigating treatment strategies in ex vivo sheep lungs during spontaneous breathing.

METHODS

An electromechanical lung simulator (xPULM) mimicking spontaneous breathing was coupled with a non-aerated premature sheep lung, replicating a premature respiratory system. Changes in tidal volume for different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels prior to and after either bolus or nebulised surfactant administration were compared.

RESULTS

In two preterm sheep lungs, we observed a progressive decline in tidal volume with increasing PEEP levels prior to surfactant delivery from 0.30 ± 0.01 mL at zero PEEP to 0.04 ± 0.01 mL at 15 cmH2O PEEP. Our measurements showed that both bolus (p < 0.05) and nebulised (p < 0.05) surfactant administration resulted in a significant increase in tidal volume, with no significant difference (p = 0.71) between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

The experimental setup demonstrated the feasibility of xPULM for investigating the effectiveness of different PEEP levels and modes of surfactant administration with respect to tidal volume in premature sheep lungs. The lack of adequate lung water resorption in our model warrants further investigations.

Impact of comprehensive quality improvement program on outcomes in very-low-birth-weight infants: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in Japan

BACKGROUND

Differences in outcomes among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Japan have been noted, prompting the need for quality improvement.

AIM

To assess a comprehensive quality improvement program on outcomes in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.

STUDY DESIGN

A cluster-randomized clinical trial.

SUBJECTS

Forty hospitals and VLBW infants born in 2012-2014 and admitted to those hospitals were study subjects.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The intervention group (IG) received a comprehensive quality improvement program involving clinical practice guidelines, educational outreach visits, workshops, opinion leader training, audits, and feedback. The control group (CG) was provided only with the guidelines. The primary outcome was survival without neurological impairment at three years of age.

RESULTS

IG consisted of 19 hospitals and 1735 infants, while CG included 21 hospitals and 1700 infants. There were no significant differences in gestational weeks, 29.1(26.9-31.3) vs. 29.1(26.7-31.1) or birth weights (g), 1054(789-1298) vs. 1084(810-1309) between the two groups. Both groups showed survival rates without neurological impairment of 67.2 % (1166) and 66.9 % (1137), respectively, without a significant difference. There was no significant difference in mortalities at NICU discharge between the groups, with rates of 4.0 % (70) and 4.2 % (72) respectively. Several clinically relevant improvements were observed in IG, including reduced rates of sepsis, adrenal insufficiency, transfusion for anemia, and a shorter interval to achieve full enteral feeding. However, these did not lead to improvements in the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive quality improvement program to Japanese NICUs did not result in a significant improvement in survival without neurological impairment in VLBW infants.

Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program: designations, diseases, and drug development

BACKGROUND

The Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was enacted in 2012 to support the development of new products for children. Prior to requesting a voucher, applicants can request RPD designation, which confirms their product treats or prevents a rare disease in which the serious manifestations primarily affect children. This study describes the trends and characteristics of these designations. Details of RPD designations are not publicly disclosable; this research represents the first analysis of the RPD designation component of the program.

RESULTS

We used an internal US Food and Drug Administration database to analyze all RPD designations between 2013 and 2022. Multiple characteristics were analyzed, including the diseases targeted by RPD designation, whether the product targeted a neonatal disease, product type (drug/biologic), and the level of evidence (preclinical/clinical) to support designation. There were 569 RPD designations during the study period. The top therapeutic areas were neurology (26%, n = 149), metabolism (23%, n = 131), oncology (18%, n = 105). The top diseases targeted by RPD designation were Duchenne muscular dystrophy, neuroblastoma, and sickle cell disease. Neonatology products represented 6% (n = 33), over half were for drug products and 38% were supported by clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPD PRV program was created to encourage development of new products for children. The results of this study establish that a wide range of diseases have seen development-from rare pediatric cancers to rare genetic disorders. Continued support of product development for children with rare diseases is needed to find treatments for all children with unmet needs.

Advocacy in neonatology: current issues and introduction to the series

Advocacy is an increasingly important skill for neonatologists. As social factors play a greater influence on short & long-term newborn outcomes, neonatal physicians must be attentive to policy factors and work to ensure they benefit the health of both patients and the specialty. In this article, we review advocacy issues of current relevance to neonatal practice, including the "Born Alive Executive Order," the "Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act," subspecialty loan repayment and legislation related to donor human milk, as well as introduce topics further discussed as part of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Advocacy Series.

Commentary: The Injustice of Paediatric Drug Labelling in Canada - A Call to Action

Building upon the article by Moore Hepburn et al. (2023), this rejoinder acts to reinforce the inadequacy of current drug labelling laws and the urgency of the need for improved paediatric drug regulation in Canada. To facilitate a path forward, specific examples of success in other trusted foreign jurisdictions are provided. A call to educate parents and the public about the current lack of paediatric drug labelling and the ways that multi-stakeholder groups can work together to ensure safe and effective pharmacotherapy for Canadian children are highlighted.

Barriers in translating stem cell therapies for neonatal diseases

Over the last 20 years, stem cells of varying origin and their associated secretome have been investigated as a therapeutic option for a myriad of neonatal models of disease, with very promising results. Despite the devastating nature of some of these disorders, translation of the preclinical evidence to the bedside has been slow. In this review, we explore the existing clinical evidence for stem cell therapies in neonates, highlight the barriers faced by researchers and suggest potential solutions to move the field forward.