HDAC inhibitors induce LIFR expression and promote a dormancy phenotype in breast cancer

Adaptation to acidic conditions that mimic the tumor microenvironment, downregulates miR-193b-3p, and induces EMT via TGFβ2 in A549 cells

The acidic tumor microenvironment plays a critical role in the malignant transformation of cancer cells. One mechanism underlying this transformation involves epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This is induced by prolonged exposure to acidic conditions. EMT is an essential process in cancer progression, with Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) playing a central role in its induction. However, little was known about the factors regulating TGF-β under acidic conditions. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanism of EMT under acidic conditions and identify novel therapeutic targets to inhibit cancer cell migration and metastasis. Focusing on lung cancer, we explored microRNAs associated with EMT that were differentially expressed under acidic conditions in A549 cells and identified miR-193b-3p as a novel candidate. Under acidic conditions, miR-193b-3p expression decreased around days 3-14. Downregulation of miR-193b-3p promoted increased TGFβ2 expression, resulting in EMT changes in A549 cells. Our study suggests that the interaction between miR-193b-3p, TGFβ2, and the acidic tumor microenvironment promotes cancer EMT change. Understanding these interactions may not only enhance our biological comprehension of cancer, but also pave the way for the development of targeted therapies to inhibit cancer metastasis.

Towards understanding cancer dormancy over strategic hitching up mechanisms to technologies

Delving into cancer dormancy has been an inherent task that may drive the lethal recurrence of cancer after primary tumor relief. Cells in quiescence can survive for a short or long term in silence, may undergo genetic or epigenetic changes, and can initiate relapse through certain contextual cues. The state of dormancy can be induced by multiple conditions including cancer drug treatment, in turn, undergoes a life cycle that generally occurs through dissemination, invasion, intravasation, circulation, immune evasion, extravasation, and colonization. Throughout this cascade, a cellular machinery governs the fate of individual cells, largely affected by gene regulation. Despite its significance, a precise view of cancer dormancy is yet hampered. Revolutionizing advanced single cell and long read sequencing through analysis methodologies and artificial intelligence, the most recent stage in the research tool progress, is expected to provide a holistic view of the diverse aspects of cancer dormancy.

Tumor dormancy and relapse: understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer recurrence

Cancer recurrence, driven by the phenomenon of tumor dormancy, presents a formidable challenge in oncology. Dormant cancer cells have the ability to evade detection and treatment, leading to relapse. This review emphasizes the urgent need to comprehend tumor dormancy and its implications for cancer recurrence. Despite notable advancements, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying dormancy and the lack of reliable biomarkers for predicting relapse. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the cellular, angiogenic, and immunological aspects of dormancy. It highlights the current therapeutic strategies targeting dormant cells, particularly combination therapies and immunotherapies, which hold promise in preventing relapse. By elucidating these mechanisms and proposing innovative research methodologies, this review aims to deepen our understanding of tumor dormancy, ultimately facilitating the development of more effective strategies for preventing cancer recurrence and improving patient outcomes.

Roles of leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in cancer

Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR), in complex with glycoprotein 130 (gp130) as the receptor for leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), can bind to a variety of cytokines and subsequently activate a variety of signaling pathways, including Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. LIF, the most multifunctional cytokines of the interleukin-6 family acts as both a growth factor and a growth inhibitor in different types of tumors. LIF/LIFR signaling regulates a broad array of tumor-related processes including proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion. However, due to the activation of different signaling pathways, opposite regulatory effects are observed in certain tumor cells. Therefore, the role of LIFR in human cancers varies across different tumor and tissue, despite their recognized value in tumor treatment and prognosis observation is affirmed. Given its aberrant expression in numerous tumor cells and crucial regulatory function in tumorigenesis and progression, LIFR is considered as a promising targeted therapeutic agent. This review provides an overview of LIFR's initiating signaling pathway function as a cytokine receptor and summarize the current literature on the role of LIFR in cancer and its possible use in therapy.

Cancer Cells in Sleep Mode: Wake Them to Eliminate or Keep Them Asleep Forever?

Cancer cell dormancy is a critical phase in cancer development, wherein cancer cells exist in a latent state marked by temporary but reversible growth arrest. This dormancy phase contributes to anticancer drug resistance, cancer recurrence, and metastasis. Treatment strategies aimed at cancer dormancy can be categorized into two contradictory approaches: inducing cancer cells into a dormant state or eliminating dormant cells. While the former seeks to establish permanent dormancy, the latter aims at eradicating this small population of dormant cells. In this review, we explore the current advancements in therapeutic methods targeting cancer cell dormancy and discuss future strategies. The concept of cancer cell dormancy has emerged as a promising avenue for novel cancer treatments, holding the potential for breakthroughs in the future.

SNORA28 Promotes Proliferation and Radioresistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells through the STAT3 Pathway by Increasing H3K9 Acetylation in the LIFR Promoter

Radiotherapy is essential for treating colorectal cancer (CRC), especially in advanced rectal cancer. However, the low radiosensitivity of CRC cells greatly limits radiotherapy efficacy. Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNA that primarily direct post-transcriptional modifications of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and other cellular RNAs. While snoRNAs are involved in tumor progression and chemoresistance, their association with radiosensitivity remains largely unknown. Herein, SNORA28 is shown highly expressed in CRC and is positively associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, SNORA28 overexpression enhances the growth and radioresistance of CRC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, SNORA28 acts as a molecular decoy that recruits bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), which increases the level of H3K9 acetylation at the LIFR promoter region. This stimulates LIFR transcription, which in turn triggers the JAK1/STAT3 pathway, enhancing the proliferation and radioresistance of CRC cells. Overall, these results highlight the ability of snoRNAs to regulate radiosensitivity in tumor cells and affect histone acetylation modification in the promoter region of target genes, thus broadening the current knowledge of snoRNA biological functions and the mechanism underlying target gene regulation.

Epigenetic Control of Cancer Cell Dormancy and Awakening in Endocrine Therapy Resistance

SUMMARY

Rosano, Sofyali, Dhiman, and colleagues show that epigenetic-related changes occur in endocrine therapy (ET)-induced dormancy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, as well as in its reawakening. Targeting these epigenetic changes blocks the entrance to dormancy and reduces the persister cancer cell population, enhancing the cytotoxic effects of ET in vitro. See related article by Rosano et al., p. 866 (9).

Unveiling cancer dormancy: Intrinsic mechanisms and extrinsic forces

Tumor cells disseminate in various distant organs at early stages of cancer progression. These disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) can stay dormant/quiescent without causing patient symptoms for years or decades. These dormant tumor cells survive despite curative treatments by entering growth arrest, escaping immune surveillance, and/or developing drug resistance. However, these dormant cells can reactivate to proliferate, causing metastatic progression and/or relapse, posing a threat to patients' survival. It's unclear how cancer cells maintain dormancy and what triggers their reactivation. What are better approaches to prevent metastatic progression and relapse through harnessing cancer dormancy? To answer these remaining questions, we reviewed the studies of tumor dormancy and reactivation in various types of cancer using different model systems, including the brief history of dormancy studies, the intrinsic characteristics of dormant cells, and the external cues at the cellular and molecular levels. Furthermore, we discussed future directions in the field and the strategies for manipulating dormancy to prevent metastatic progression and recurrence.

Unveiling the role of cellular dormancy in cancer progression and recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cellular dormancy is a major contributor to cancer progression and recurrence. This review explores recent findings on the molecular mechanisms implicated in cancer dormancy and investigates potential strategies to improve therapeutic interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research on cancer dormancy reveals a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. Providing a latent reservoir of tumor cells with reduced proliferation and enhanced drug-tolerance, dormant cancer cells emerge from a clonally diverse population after therapy or at metastatic sites. These cells exhibit distinct transcriptional and epigenetic profiles, involving the downregulation of Myc and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways, and the induction of autophagy. Senescence traits, under the control of factors such as p53, also contribute significantly. The tumor microenvironment can either promote or prevent dormancy establishment, notably through the involvement of T and NK cells within the dormant tumor niche. Strategies to combat dormancy-related relapse include direct elimination of dormant tumor cells, sustaining dormancy to prolong survival, or awakening dormant cells to re-sensitize them to antiproliferative drugs.

SUMMARY

Improving our understanding of cancer dormancy at primary and secondary sites provides valuable insights into patient care and relapse prevention.

KRAS G12C-mutant driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

KRAS G12C mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) partially respond to KRAS G12C covalent inhibitors. However, early adaptive resistance occurs due to rewiring of signaling pathways, activating receptor tyrosine kinases, primarily EGFR, but also MET and ligands. Evidence indicates that treatment with KRAS G12C inhibitors (sotorasib) triggers the MRAS:SHOC2:PP1C trimeric complex. Activation of MRAS occurs from alterations in the Scribble and Hippo-dependent pathways, leading to YAP activation. Other mechanisms that involve STAT3 signaling are intertwined with the activation of MRAS. The high-resolution MRAS:SHOC2:PP1C crystallization structure allows in silico analysis for drug development. Activation of MRAS:SHOC2:PP1C is primarily Scribble-driven and downregulated by HUWE1. The reactivation of the MRAS complex is carried out by valosin containing protein (VCP). Exploring these pathways as therapeutic targets and their impact on different chemotherapeutic agents (carboplatin, paclitaxel) is crucial. Comutations in STK11/LKB1 often co-occur with KRAS G12C, jeopardizing the effect of immune checkpoint (anti-PD1/PDL1) inhibitors.

PTHrP intracrine actions divergently influence breast cancer growth through p27 and LIFR

The role of parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related protein (PTHrP) in breast cancer remains controversial, with reports of PTHrP inhibiting or promoting primary tumor growth in preclinical studies. Here, we provide insight into these conflicting findings by assessing the role of specific biological domains of PTHrP in tumor progression through stable expression of PTHrP (-36-139aa) or truncated forms with deletion of the nuclear localization sequence (NLS) alone or in combination with the C-terminus. Although the full-length PTHrP molecule (-36-139aa) did not alter tumorigenesis, PTHrP lacking the NLS alone accelerated primary tumor growth by downregulating p27, while PTHrP lacking the NLS and C-terminus repressed tumor growth through p27 induction driven by the tumor suppressor leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR). Induction of p27 by PTHrP lacking the NLS and C-terminus persisted in bone disseminated cells, but did not prevent metastatic outgrowth, in contrast to the primary tumor site. These data suggest that the PTHrP NLS functions as a tumor suppressor, while the PTHrP C-terminus may act as an oncogenic switch to promote tumor progression through differential regulation of p27 signaling.

Dormant cancer cells and polyploid giant cancer cells: The roots of cancer recurrence and metastasis

Tumour cell dormancy is critical for metastasis and resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) with giant or multiple nuclei and high DNA content have the properties of cancer stem cell and single PGCCs can individually generate tumours in immunodeficient mice. PGCCs represent a dormant form of cancer cells that survive harsh tumour conditions and contribute to tumour recurrence. Hypoxic mimics, chemotherapeutics, radiation and cytotoxic traditional Chinese medicines can induce PGCCs formation through endoreduplication and/or cell fusion. After incubation, dormant PGCCs can recover from the treatment and produce daughter cells with strong proliferative, migratory and invasive abilities via asymmetric cell division. Additionally, PGCCs can resist hypoxia or chemical stress and have a distinct protein signature that involves chromatin remodelling and cell cycle regulation. Dormant PGCCs form the cellular basis for therapeutic resistance, metastatic cascade and disease recurrence. This review summarises regulatory mechanisms governing dormant cancer cells entry and exit of dormancy, which may be used by PGCCs, and potential therapeutic strategies for targeting PGCCs.

The Role of Breast Cancer Cells in Bone Metastasis: Suitable Seeds for Nourishing Soil

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to describe the characteristics of breast cancer cells prone to developing bone metastasis and determine how they are regulated by the bone microenvironment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The bone is a site of frequent breast cancer metastasis. Bone metastasis accounts for 70% of advanced breast cancer cases and remains incurable. It can lead to skeletal-related events, such as bone fracture and pain, and seriously affect the quality of life of patients. Breast cancer cells escape from the primary lesion and spread to the bone marrow in the early stages. They can then enter the dormant state and restore tumourigenicity after several years to develop overt metastasis. In the last few years, an increasing number of studies have reported on the factors promoting bone metastasis of breast cancer cells, both at the primary and metastatic sites. Identifying factors associated with bone metastasis aids in the early recognition of bone metastasis tendency. How to target these factors and minimize the side effects on the bone remains to be further explored.

Epigenetic control of the vicious cycle

Epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation and post translational modifications to histones, drive tumorigenesis and metastatic progression. In the context of bone metastasis, epigenetic modifications in tumor cells can modulate dissemination of cancer cells to the bone, tumor progression in the bone marrow, and may be associated with patient survival rates. Bone disseminated tumor cells may enter a dormant state or stimulate osteolysis through the "vicious cycle" of bone metastasis where bone disseminated tumor cells disrupt the bone microenvironment, which fuels tumor progression. Epigenetic alterations may either exacerbate or abrogate the vicious cycle by regulating tumor suppressors and oncogenes, which alter proliferation of bone-metastatic cancer cells. This review focuses on the specific epigenetic alterations that regulate bone metastasis, including DNA methylation, histone methylation, and histone acetylation. Here, we summarize key findings from researchers identifying epigenetic changes that drive tumor progression in the bone, along with pre-clinical and clinical studies investigating the utility of targeting aberrant epigenetic alterations to treat bone metastatic cancer.

PCBP1 regulates LIFR through FAM3C to maintain breast cancer stem cell self-renewal and invasiveness

The poly(rC) binding protein 1 gene (PCBP1) encodes the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein E1 (hnRNPE1), a nucleic acid-binding protein that plays a tumor-suppressive role in the mammary epithelium by regulating phenotypic plasticity and cell fate. Following the loss of PCBP1 function, the FAM3C gene (encoding the Interleukin-like EMT inducer, or "ILEI" protein) and the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) gene are upregulated. Interaction between FAM3C and LIFR in the extracellular space induces phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3). Overexpression and/or hyperactivity of STAT3 has been detected in 40% of breast cancer cases and is associated with a poor prognosis. Herein, we characterize feed-forward regulation of LIFR expression in response to FAM3C/LIFR/STAT3 signaling in mammary epithelial cells. We show that PCBP1 upregulates LIFR transcription through activity at the LIFR promoter, and that FAM3C participates in transcriptional regulation of LIFR. Additionally, our bioinformatic analysis reveals a signature of transcriptional regulation associated with FAM3C/LIFR interaction and identifies the TWIST1 transcription factor as a downstream effector that participates in the maintenance of LIFR expression. Finally, we characterize the effect of LIFR expression in cell-based experiments that demonstrate the promotion of invasion, migration, and self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), consistent with previous studies linking LIFR expression to tumor initiation and metastasis in mammary epithelial cells.

Acetyl-CoA metabolism as a therapeutic target for cancer

Acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), an essential metabolite, not only takes part in numerous intracellular metabolic processes, powers the tricarboxylic acid cycle, serves as a key hub for the biosynthesis of fatty acids and isoprenoids, but also serves as a signaling substrate for acetylation reactions in post-translational modification of proteins, which is crucial for the epigenetic inheritance of cells. Acetyl-CoA links lipid metabolism with histone acetylation to create a more intricate regulatory system that affects the growth, aggressiveness, and drug resistance of malignancies such as glioblastoma, breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. These fascinating advances in the knowledge of acetyl-CoA metabolism during carcinogenesis and normal physiology have raised interest regarding its modulation in malignancies. In this review, we provide an overview of the regulation and cancer relevance of main metabolic pathways in which acetyl-CoA participates. We also summarize the role of acetyl-CoA in the metabolic reprogramming and stress regulation of cancer cells, as well as medical application of inhibitors targeting its dysregulation in therapeutic intervention of cancers.

Dormancy in Breast Cancer

The pattern of delayed recurrence in a subset of breast cancer patients has long been explained by a model that incorporates a variable period of cellular or tumor mass dormancy prior to disease relapse. In this review, we critically evaluate existing data to develop a framework for inferring the existence of dormancy in clinical contexts of breast cancer. We integrate these clinical data with rapidly evolving mechanistic insights into breast cancer dormancy derived from a broad array of genetically engineered mouse models as well as experimental models of metastasis. Finally, we propose actionable interventions and discuss ongoing clinical trials that translate the wealth of knowledge gained in the laboratory to the long-term clinical management of patients at a high risk of developing recurrence.

HER3 targeting augments the efficacy of panobinostat in claudin-low triple-negative breast cancer cells

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have a poor prognosis and high relapse rate due to limited therapeutic options. This study was conducted to determine the mechanisms of action of panobinostat, a pan-inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and FDA-approved medication for multiple myeloma, in TNBC and to provide a rationale for effective drug combinations against this aggressive disease. RNA sequencing analyses of the claudin-low (CL) TNBC (MDA-MB-231) cells untreated or treated with panobinostat were performed to identify the differentially expressed genes. Adaptive alterations in gene expression were analyzed and validated in additional CL TNBC cells. Tumor xenograft models were used to test the in vivo antitumor activity of panobinostat alone or its combinations with gefitinib, an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Panobinostat potently inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in all TNBC cells tested. However, in CL TNBC cells, this HDAC inhibitor markedly enhanced expression of HER3, which interacted with EGFR to activate both receptors and Akt signaling pathways. Combinations of panobinostat and gefitinib synergistically suppressed CL TNBC cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Upregulation of HER3 compromises the efficacy of panobinostat in CL TNBC. Inactivation of HER3 combined with panobinostat represents a practical approach to combat CL TNBC.

Epigenetic markers and therapeutic targets for metastasis

The last few years have seen an increasing number of discoveries which collectively demonstrate that histone and DNA modifying enzyme modulate different stages of metastasis. Moreover, epigenomic alterations can now be measured at multiple scales of analysis and are detectable in human tumors or liquid biopsies. Malignant cell clones with a proclivity for relapse in certain organs may arise in the primary tumor as a consequence of epigenomic alterations which cause a loss in lineage integrity. These alterations may occur due to genetic aberrations acquired during tumor progression or concomitant to therapeutic response. Moreover, evolution of the stroma can also alter the epigenome of cancer cells. In this review, we highlight current knowledge with a particular emphasis on leveraging chromatin and DNA modifying mechanisms as biomarkers of disseminated disease and as therapeutic targets to treat metastatic cancers.

The genomic regulation of metastatic dormancy

The genomics and pathways governing metastatic dormancy are critically important drivers of long-term patient survival given the considerable portion of cancers that recur aggressively months to years after initial treatments. Our understanding of dormancy has expanded greatly in the last two decades, with studies elucidating that the dormant state is regulated by multiple genes, microenvironmental (ME) interactions, and immune components. These forces are exerted through mechanisms that are intrinsic to the tumor cell, manifested through cross-talk between tumor and ME cells including those from the immune system, and regulated by angiogenic processes in the nascent micrometastatic niche. The development of new in vivo and 3D ME models, as well as enhancements to decades-old tumor cell pedigree models that span the development of metastatic dormancy to aggressive growth, has helped fuel what arguably is one of the least understood areas of cancer biology that nonetheless contributes immensely to patient mortality. The current review focuses on the genes and molecular pathways that regulate dormancy via tumor-intrinsic and ME cells, and how groups have envisioned harnessing these therapeutically to benefit patient survival.

Select HDAC Inhibitors Enhance Osteolysis and Bone Metastasis Outgrowth but Can Be Mitigated With Bisphosphonate Therapy

Breast cancer has a high predilection for spreading to bone with approximately 70% of patients who succumb to disease harboring bone disseminated tumor cells. Despite this high prevalence, treatments for bone metastatic breast cancer predominantly manage morbidities, including pain and hypercalcemia, rather than reducing bone metastasis incidence or growth. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), including panobinostat, entinostat, and valproic acid, typically slow primary tumor progression and are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of many cancers, including primary and metastatic breast cancer, but their effects on bone metastatic disease have not been examined in preclinical models. We report that treatment with the HDACi panobinostat, but not entinostat or valproic acid, significantly reduced trabecular bone volume in tumor-naïve mice, consistent with previous reports of HDACi-induced bone loss. Surprisingly, treatment with entinostat or panobinostat, but not valproic acid, increased tumor burden and incidence in an experimental model of breast cancer bone metastasis. In vitro, multiple HDACi stimulated expression of pro-osteolytic genes in breast tumor cells, suggesting this may be a mechanism by which HDACi fuel tumor growth. In support of this, combination therapy of panobinostat or entinostat with the antiresorptive bisphosphonate zoledronic acid prevented bone metastatic progression; however, the addition of zoledronic acid to panobinostat therapy failed to fully correct panobinostat-induced bone loss. Together these data demonstrate that select HDACi fuel bone metastatic growth and provide potential mechanistic and therapeutic avenues to offset these effects. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Pan-cancer analysis identifies LIFR as a prognostic and immunological biomarker for uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma

Background

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) exhibits significant tumor-promoting function, while its cognate receptor (LIFR) is considered to act as either a tumor promoter or suppressor. Dysregulation of LIF and LIFR is associated with the initiation, progression and metastasis of multiple cancer entities. Although increasing numbers of studies are revealing an indispensable critical role of LIFR in tumorigenesis for various different cancers, no systematic analysis of LIFR has appeared thus far.

Methods

Here, we comprehensively analyzed the expression profile and prognostic value of LIFR, and correlations between LIFR and the infiltration of immune cells and clinicopathological parameters across different tumor types using several bioinformatic tools. The expression profile of LIFR in various tumor types and clinical stages was investigated using the TIMER2 and GEPIA2 databases. Genetic alternations of LIFR were extracted from cBioPortal. The prognostic value of LIFR was assessed using GEPIA2 and Sanger box databases, and correlations between LIFR expression and immune infiltration were analyzed using the CIBERSORT method and TIMER2 database. The correlations between LIFR expression and immune and stromal scores were assessed using ESTIMATE. We also analyzed correlations between LIFR and immunoregulators. Finally, we detected an effect of LIFR on Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) and evaluated the expression level of LIFR in clinical UCEC samples.

Results

Aberrant expression of LIFR in cancers and its prognosis ability, especially in UCEC was documented. Significantly lower levels of LIFR expression level correlated with better prognosis in multiple tumor types. LIFR expression was positively correlated with the abundance of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and endothelial cells in the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, LIFR expression was strongly associated with the presence of immune modulators and checkpoint genes. Overexpression of LIFR suppressed the migration and invasion of UCEC cells in vitro.

Conclusion

Our pan-cancer detection data provided a novel understanding of the roles of LIFR in oncogenesis.

Comparison of a histone deacetylase inhibitor plus exemestane with exemestane alone in hormone receptor‑positive advanced breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy: A meta‑analysis

Currently, endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite the high sensitivity of anti-estrogen therapy, many breast cancer patients still experience disease progression, relapse, and reduced overall survival (OS) because of endocrine resistance. Several underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon include a change in hormone receptor expression, mutations in ESR1 and modification of important signaling pathways, but thus far none of these can be defined as the complete explanation. Additionally, it has been shown that in some breast cancers, expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) can be repressed by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, and this could be a mechanism for endocrine resistance. Interestingly, although the efficacy of the combination of histone deacetylase (HADC) inhibitors and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive ABC that progressed on prior endocrine therapy has been investigated in several studies, whether pharmacologic blocking of HDAC activity acts as a therapeutic strategy remains highly controversial. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an HDAC inhibitor plus exemestane vs. exemestane alone in this setting. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the combination group exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.776, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.675-0.892, P=0.000] and an improved objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.612, 95% CI=1.085-2.396, P=0.018) compared to those treated with exemestane alone. Additionally, in terms of OS, the combination group failed to achieve a significant clinical OS benefit (HR=0.811, 95% CI=0.596-1.104, P=0.183). Although grade 3/4 toxicities were more common in the combination group, those toxicities were mostly asymptomatic and manageable. In conclusion, the addition of an HDAC inhibitor to exemestane significantly improves PFS over exemestane alone in hormone receptor-positive ABC patients who progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Identification of novel biomarkers to select patients who will benefit from this combination strategy is a high priority.

The Pleiotropic role, functions and targeted therapies of LIF/LIFR axis in cancer: Old spectacles with new insights

The dysregulation of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and its cognate receptor (LIFR) has been associated with multiple cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. LIF plays a significant tumor-promoting role in cancer, while LIFR functions as a tumor promoter and suppressor. Epithelial and stromal cells secrete LIF via autocrine and paracrine signaling mechanism(s) that bind with LIFR and subsequently with co-receptor glycoprotein 130 (gp130) to activate JAK/STAT1/3, PI3K/AKT, mTORC1/p70s6K, Hippo/YAP, and MAPK signaling pathways. Clinically, activating the LIF/LIFR axis is associated with poor survival and anti-cancer therapy resistance. This review article provides an overview of the structure and ligands of LIFR, LIF/LIFR signaling in developmental biology, stem cells, cancer stem cells, genetics and epigenetics of LIFR, LIFR regulation by long non-coding RNAs and miRNAs, and LIF/LIFR signaling in cancers. Finally, neutralizing antibodies and small molecule inhibitors preferentially blocking LIF interaction with LIFR and antagonists against LIFR under pre-clinical and early-phase pre-clinical trials were discussed.

HDAC inhibitors stimulate LIFR when it is repressed by hypoxia or PTHrP in breast cancer

Breast cancer cells frequently disseminate to the bone marrow, where they either induce osteolysis or enter a dormant state. Downregulation of leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR), a known breast tumor suppressor, enables otherwise dormant MCF7 human breast cancer cells to become aggressively osteolytic. Hypoxia (low oxygen tensions), which may develop in tumors as a pathological response to the metabolic demands of the proliferating cells and as a physiological state in the bone, downregulates LIFR in breast cancer cells independent of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) signaling. However, the mechanism by which LIFR is repressed in hypoxia is unknown. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors stimulate LIFR by increasing histone acetylation in the proximal promoter and induce a dormancy phenotype in breast cancer cells inoculated into the mammary fat pad. We therefore aimed to determine whether hypoxia alters histone acetylation in the LIFR promoter, and whether HDAC inhibitors effectively stimulate LIFR in breast cancer cells residing in hypoxic microenvironments. Herein, we confirmed that disseminated MCF7 cells became hypoxic in the bone and that hypoxia increased the epigenetic transcriptional repressor H3K9me3 in the distal LIFR promoter while H3K9ac, which promotes transcription, was significantly reduced. Furthermore, HDAC inhibitor treatment rescued hypoxic repression and dramatically increased expression of LIFR, p38β, and p21, which regulate tumor dormancy. In a second model of LIFR repression, in which parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) suppresses LIFR expression, we found that PTHrP binds to the distal LIFR promoter, and that PTHrP suppression of LIFR protein is similarly reversed by HDAC inhibitor treatment. Together, these data suggest that HDAC inhibitors stimulate LIFR regardless of the way it is repressed by the microenvironment.