A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of minocycline on translocator protein distribution volume in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

Investigating the potential of minocycline in reducing brain inflammation in chronic low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled mechanistic clinical trial

ABSTRACT

Our group has shown that translocator protein (TSPO) levels, a putative marker of neuroinflammation, are increased in the brain and spinal cord of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). Whether neuroinflammation might be a therapeutic target for this condition is unknown. In this phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, we sought to evaluate whether the tetracycline antibiotic minocycline, which is commonly used as a glial inhibitor in preclinical models, has an effect on brain TSPO levels in adults with cLBP. Participants randomly received 100-mg minocycline or placebo, once a day for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the change (pretreatment vs posttreatment) in thalamic TSPO levels, measured using [ 11 C]PBR28 positron emission tomography signal (standardized uptake value ratio) and analyzed with a mixed effect model. Secondary outcome measures included the change in Brief Pain Inventory, severity subscore. Among 60 enrolled participants, 48 completed the trial. Of these, 25 received minocycline (age [years], mean ± SD: 44.6 ± 16.9; 9 female), and 23 received placebo (49 ± 17.1; 9 female). The mean thalamic positron emission tomography standard uptake value ratio was very stable across visits in both groups, with no significant group-by-time interaction ( P = 0.956). Similarly, both groups demonstrated a comparable decrease over time in Brief Pain Inventory severity scores ( P = 0.018) and no significant group-by-time interaction ( P = 0.329). Our results suggest that minocycline, at the tested regimen, may neither reduce brain TSPO levels nor have clinically meaningful effects on clinical pain in patients with cLBP.

Advancing precision psychiatry and targeted treatments: Insights from immunopsychiatry

Despite tremendous advancements in neuroscience, there has been limited impact on patient care. Current psychiatric treatments are largely non-specific, and drug development is hindered by outdated, overinclusive diagnostic categories and a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Additionally, mechanisms underlying psychiatric illnesses and their treatments with conventional medications remain poorly understood. Precision psychiatry is a strategy that holds great promise for novel therapies targeting specific pathophysiologic mechanisms in selected patients, ultimately contributing to more effective, personalized treatments. Immunopsychiatry, which focuses on the immune system's role in psychiatric disorders, exemplifies the challenges and potential solutions for precision psychiatry. Despite understanding how inflammation contributes to psychiatric illness, results of clinical trials with anti-inflammatory drugs have been inconsistent and underwhelming. Shortcomings of these trials include a lack of focus on subgroups of patients with increased inflammation, the use of non-specific outcome variables (e.g., not specific to inflammation's impact on the brain and behavior), and failure to establish target engagement of the inflammatory response. To advance anti-inflammatory treatments, clinical trials should: 1) enrich for patients using predictive biomarkers; 2) use clinical outcome assessments that align with inflammation's effects on the brain; 3) consider novel diagnostic constructs linked to inflammation; and 4) verify target engagement. Moreover, greater attention should be paid to efforts to repurpose available anti-inflammatory drugs while awaiting development of novel treatments targeting more specific immune pathways. Taken together, a collaborative approach involving academia, industry, funding agencies, patients, payors, and policymakers is required to advance Immunopsychiatry and ultimately provide a roadmap for successful implementation of precision psychiatry.

Efficacy of Minocycline in Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Traditional antidepressant therapy is associated with an inadequate response and a low remission rate. Our aim was to synthesize published randomized controlled trials on the potential effects of minocycline in patients with depression.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published. Randomized controlled trials published in English that evaluated the efficacy of minocycline in patients with depression were selected for inclusion. Changes from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) or Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were pooled to determine the antidepressant effect of minocycline compared with placebo. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Eight trials with 567 participants were eligible and included in the analysis. The meta-analysis did not reveal a statistically significant effect of minocycline on depression based on HDRS or MADRS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the HDRS and MADRS scores, minocycline did not demonstrate effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms.

Efficacy of inflammation-based stratification for add-on celecoxib or minocycline in major depressive disorder: Protocol of the INSTA-MD double-blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial

Introduction

Different lines of evidence confirm the involvement of the immune system in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. Up to 30% of depressed patients present with an immune-mediated subtype, characterized by peripheral inflammation (high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 3 mg/l) and an atypical symptom profile with fatigue, anhedonia, increased appetite, and hypersomnia. This immune-mediated subtype of MDD is associated with poorer response to first-line antidepressant treatment. Consequently, strategies for immune-targeted augmentation should be prioritised towards patients with this subtype. Meta-analyses have shown modest but heterogeneous treatment effects with immune-targeted augmentation in unstratified MDD cohorts, with celecoxib and minocycline as most promising first-line treatment options. However, no study has prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of a priori stratification by baseline inflammation levels for add-on celecoxib or minocycline in MDD.

Methods

The INSTA-MD trial is a multicentre, 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group stratified clinical trial of adjunctive minocycline or celecoxib to treatment-as-usual for patients with MDD. Two hundred forty adult patients with Major Depressive Disorder who failed to remit with one or two trials of antidepressant treatment will be enrolled and allocated to high-hsCRP (hsCRP ≥3 mg/L) or low-hsCRP (hsCRP <3 mg/L) strata, where disproportional stratified sampling will ensure equally sized strata. Participants in each hsCRP stratum will be randomised to augment their ongoing antidepressant treatment with either adjunctive minocycline, celecoxib or placebo for a duration of 12 weeks, resulting in six treatment arms of each 40 participants. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of immune-targeted augmentation with minocycline or celecoxib versus placebo, and the use of baseline hsCRP stratification to predict treatment response. Additionally, we will perform a head-to-head analysis between the two active compounds. The primary outcome measure is change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score. Secondary outcome measures will be response and remission rates, and change in inflammation-specific symptoms, adverse events and therapy acceptability (adherence). Further exploratory analyses will be performed with an array of peripheral inflammatory biomarkers, metabolic outcomes and physiological data.

Expected impact

The aim of INSTA-MD is to advance the use of immune-targeted precision psychiatry, by supporting the implementation of targeted hsCRP screening and treatment of immune-mediated MDD as a cost-effective intervention in primary care settings. Based on previous studies, we expect immune-targeted augmentation with minocycline or celecoxib to yield a superior remission rate of 15-30% compared to treatment as usual for immune-mediated cases of MDD. By treating immune-related depression early in the treatment algorithm with repurposed first-line anti-inflammatory treatments, we can significantly improve the outcomes of these patients, and reduce the global societal and economic burden of depression.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Board (CTR - 04/08/2023).

Registration details

Trial registration number NCT05644301 (Clinical trial.gov), EU-CT 2022-501692-35-00.

Prophylactic Minocycline for Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a potentially severe form of acute encephalopathy. Minocycline has neuroprotective effects in animal models of neurologic diseases; however, data from human studies remain scarce.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the neuroprotective effect of minocycline prevent delirium occurrence in critically ill patients?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-anonymized trial conducted in four ICUs. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible and randomized to receive minocycline (100 mg, twice daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was delirium incidence within 28 days or before ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included days in delirium during ICU stay, delirium/coma-free days, length of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, and hospital mortality. The kinetics of various inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and C-reactive protein) and brain-related biomarkers (brain-derived neurotrophic factor and S100B) were used as exploratory outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were randomized, but one patient in the placebo group died before treatment; thus the data from 159 patients were analyzed (minocycline, n = 84; placebo, n = 75). After the COVID-19 pandemic it was decided to stop patient inclusion early. There was a small but significant decrease in delirium incidence: 17 patients (20%) in the minocycline arm compared with 26 patients (35%) in the placebo arm (P = .043). No other delirium-related outcomes were modified by minocycline treatment. Unexpectedly, there was a significant decrease in hospital mortality (39% vs. 23%; P = .029). Among all analyzed biomarkers, only plasma levels of C-reactive protein decreased significantly after minocycline treatment (F = 0.75, P = .78, within time; F = 4.09, P = .045, group × time).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings in this rather small study signal a possible positive effect of minocycline on delirium incidence. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of this drug as a preventive measure in critically ill patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04219735; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Cool the Inflamed Brain: A Novel Anti-inflammatory Strategy for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Abundant evidence suggests that inflammatory cytokines contribute to the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) by altering neurotransmission, neuroplasticity, and neuroendocrine processes. Given the unsatisfactory response and remission of monoaminergic antidepressants, anti-inflammatory therapy is proposed as a feasible way to augment the antidepressant effect. Recently, there have been emerging studies investigating the efficiency and efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of MDD and depressive symptoms comorbid with somatic diseases.

METHODS

In this narrative review, prospective clinical trials focusing on anti-inflammatory treatment for depression have been comprehensively searched and screened. Based on the included studies, we summarize the rationale for the anti-inflammatory therapy of depression and discuss the utilities and confusions regarding the anti-inflammatory strategy for MDD.

RESULTS

This review included over 45 eligible trials. For ease of discussion, we have grouped them into six categories based on their mechanism of action, and added some other anti-inflammatory modalities, including Chinese herbal medicine and non-drug therapy. Pooled results suggest that anti-inflammatory therapy is effective in improving depressive symptoms, whether used as monotherapy or add-on therapy. However, there remain confusions in the application of anti-inflammatory therapy for MDD.

CONCLUSION

Based on current clinical evidence, anti-inflammatory therapy is a promisingly effective treatment for depression. This study proposes a novel strategy for clinical diagnosis, disease classification, personalized treatment, and prognostic prediction of depression. Inflammatory biomarkers are recommended to be assessed at the first admission of MDD patients, and anti-inflammatory therapy are recommended to be included in the clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Those patients with high levels of baseline inflammation (e.g., CRP > 3 mg/L) may benefit from adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapy.

Minocycline in depression not responding to first-line therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder is often resistant to first-line treatment, with around 30% failing to respond to traditional therapy. Treatment-resistant depression results in prolonged hospitalization and healthcare costs. Anti-inflammatory drugs have shown promising results in depression not responding to initial therapy. Minocycline has anti-inflammatory properties and crosses the blood-brain barrier. It has demonstrated varied results in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We assessed the efficacy of minocycline compared to placebo in depression not responding to one first-line antidepressant via a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for RCTs. We visualized the results using forest plots and drapery plots. We assessed and explored heterogeneity using I2, prediction interval, and meta-regression. Then, we rated the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

Four RCTs revealed a non-significant difference in depression severity [-3.93; 95% CI: -16.14 to 8.28], rate of response [1.15; 0.33-4.01], and rate of remission [0.94; 0.44-2.01]. However, the reduction in depression severity is significant at a trend of P < .1. The high between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 78%) for depression severity could be answered by meta-regression (P = .02) for the duration of therapy.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference with minocycline compared to placebo for depression not responding to first-line antidepressant therapy. However, the treatment response varies with treatment duration and patients' neuroinflammatory state. Thus, larger and longer RCTs, especially in diverse disease subgroups, are needed for further insight. This is needed to allow greater precision medicine in depression and avoid elevated healthcare expenditure associated with hit-and-trial regimens.

REGISTRATION

CRD42023398476 (PROSPERO).

Molecular imaging findings for treatment resistant depression

Approximately 40% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) had limited response to conventional antidepressant treatments, resulting in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), a debilitating subtype that yielded a significant disease burden worldwide. Molecular imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT), can measure targeted macromolecules or biological processes in vivo. These imaging tools provide a unique possibility to explore the pathophysiology and treatment mechanisms underlying TRD. This work reviewed and summarized prior PET and SPECT studies to examine the neurobiology and treatment-induced changes of TRD. A total of 51 articles were included with supplementary information from studies for MDD and healthy controls (HC). We found that there were altered regional blood flow or metabolic activity in several brain regions, such as the anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, insula, hippocampus, amygdala, parahippocampus, and striatum. These regions have been suggested to engage in the pathophysiology or treatment resistance of depression. There was also limited data to demonstrate the changes in the markers of serotonin, dopamine, amyloid, and microglia over some regions in TRD. Moreover, several observed abnormal imaging indices were linked to treatment outcomes, supporting their specificity and clinical relevance. To address the limitations of the included studies, we proposed that future studies needed longitudinal designs, multimodal approaches, and radioligands targeting specific neural substrates for TRD to evaluate their baseline and treatment-related alterations in TRD. Adequate data sharing and reproducible data analysis can facilitate advances in this field.

Inflammation, stress and depression: An exploration of ketamine's therapeutic profile

Well-established animal models of depression have described a proximal relationship between stress and central nervous system (CNS) inflammation - a relationship mirrored in the peripheral inflammatory biomarkers of individuals with depression. Evidence also suggests that stress-induced proinflammatory states can contribute to the neurobiology of treatment-resistant depression. Interestingly, ketamine, a rapid-acting antidepressant, can partially exert its therapeutic effects via anti-inflammatory actions on the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, the kynurenine pathway or by cytokine suppression. Further investigations into the relationship between ketamine, inflammation and stress could provide insight into ketamine's unique therapeutic mechanisms and stimulate efforts to develop rapid-acting, anti-inflammatory-based antidepressants.

Normalization of Neuroinflammation: A New Strategy for Treatment of Persistent Pain and Memory/Emotional Deficits in Chronic Pain

Chronic pain, which affects around 1/3 of the world population and is often comorbid with memory deficit and mood depression, is a leading source of suffering and disability. Studies in past decades have shown that hyperexcitability of primary sensory neurons resulting from abnormal expression of ion channels and central sensitization mediated pathological synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation in spinal dorsal horn, underlie the persistent pain. The memory/emotional deficits are associated with impaired synaptic connectivity in hippocampus. Dysregulation of numerous endogenous proteins including receptors and intracellular signaling molecules is involved in the pathological processes. However, increasing knowledge contributes little to clinical treatment. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that the neuroinflammation, characterized by overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and glial activation, is reliably detected in humans and animals with chronic pain, and is sufficient to induce persistent pain and memory/emotional deficits. The abnormal expression of ion channels and pathological synaptic plasticity in spinal dorsal horn and in hippocampus are resulting from neuroinflammation. The neuroinflammation is initiated and maintained by the interactions of circulating monocytes, glial cells and neurons. Obviously, unlike infectious diseases and cancer, which are caused by pathogens or malignant cells, chronic pain is resulting from alterations of cells and molecules which have numerous physiological functions. Therefore, normalization (counterbalance) but not simple inhibition of the neuroinflammation is the right strategy for treating neuronal disorders. Currently, no such agent is available in clinic. While experimental studies have demonstrated that intracellular Mg²⁺ deficiency is a common feature of chronic pain in animal models and supplement Mg²⁺ are capable of normalizing the neuroinflammation, activation of upregulated proteins that promote recovery, such as translocator protein (18k Da) or liver X receptors, has a similar effect. In this article, relevant experimental and clinical evidence is reviewed and discussed.

Dopamine and Neuroinflammation in Schizophrenia - Interpreting the Findings from Translocator Protein (18kDa) PET Imaging

Schizophrenia is a complex disease whose pathophysiology is not yet fully understood. In addition to the long prevailing dopaminergic hypothesis, the evidence suggests that neuroinflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of the disease. Recent studies using positron emission tomography (PET) that target a 18kDa translocator protein (TSPO) in activated microglial cells in an attempt to measure neuroinflammation in patients have shown a decrease or a lack of an increase in TSPO binding. Many biological and methodological considerations have been formulated to explain these findings. Although dopamine has been described as an immunomodulatory molecule, its potential role in neuroinflammation has not been explored in the aforementioned studies. In this review, we discuss the interactions between dopamine and neuroinflammation in psychotic states. Dopamine may inhibit neuroinflammation in activated microglia. Proinflammatory molecules released from microglia may decrease dopaminergic transmission. This could potentially explain why the levels of neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with schizophrenia seem to be unchanged or decreased compared to those in healthy subjects. However, most data are indirect and are derived from animal studies or from studies performed outside the field of schizophrenia. Further studies are needed to combine TSPO and dopamine imaging to study the association between microglial activation and dopamine system function.