Associations between febrile neutropenia-related parameters and the risk of acute GVHD or non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Clinical Characteristics and Optimization of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Purpose

Since the publication of the 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN), there have been significant shifts in pathogen profiles and emerging challenges in treatment. These include increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and changes in the distribution of Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria (GPB). The study aims to update and optimize empirical treatment strategies for hematological malignancy (HM) patients, a population particularly vulnerable to these evolving threats.

Methods

A literature review was conducted on studies published between January 2010 and December 2023 regarding empirical treatment of FN in HM patients, focusing on pathogen characteristics, treatment regimens, and duration of therapy.

Results

Approximately one-third of HM patients with FN experience fever of unknown origin (FUO), while 40-50% have clinically documented infections (CDI), and 10-30% present with microbiologically documented infections (MDI), with a predominance of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Factors such as prolonged neutropenia, prior broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and previous infections with drug-resistant bacteria are associated with MDR infections. Cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), and carbapenem are viable empirical treatments for high-risk HM patients, though cefepime monotherapy's advantage remains uncertain. In cases of pneumonia, shock, or suspected carbapenem-resistant infections, combination therapy, tigecycline, and newer antibiotics like ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) are often used. Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics can be safely discontinued in FUO patients after 48 hours of clinical stability and apyrexia.

Conclusion

Proper selection of empirical antibiotics and determining optimal treatment duration are essential for reducing antibiotic resistance and improving outcomes in HM patients with FN. These findings underscore the need for updated clinical guidelines that address evolving pathogen profiles and the growing challenge of MDR infections.

Levels of C-Reactive Protein and Body Temperature Elevation During Neutropenia Predict Engraftment and Non-Relapse Mortality for Unrelated Single-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) presents unique challenges related to inflammation during neutropenia, such as mucosal damage, infections, and the potential development of pre-engraftment syndrome or pre-engraftment immune reaction. These factors can contribute to significant inflammation and infection shortly after CBT. However, the effect of severe inflammation during neutropenia, specifically elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and body temperature, on post-transplant outcomes after CBT remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between maximum CRP level, maximum body temperature during neutropenia, and post-transplantation outcomes in adult patients undergoing single-unit CBT. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of maximum CRP level and maximum body temperature during neutropenia on post-transplantation outcomes in adults who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT between 1998 and 2023 at our institution. A total of 336 adult patients were included in this study. The median maximum CRP level before neutrophil recovery was 7.75 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 4.70 to 12.05 mg/dL) at a median of 14 d (IQR, 8 to 16 d). The median maximum body temperature before neutrophil recovery was 39.5°C (IQR, 39.0 to 40.0°C) at a median of 15 d (IQR, 12 to 17 d). In the multivariate analysis, a maximum CRP level≥20 mg/dL was significantly associated with lower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.59; P < .001), lower platelet recovery (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.48; P < .001), and a higher incidence of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HR, 16.42; 95% CI, 4.11 to 65.54; P < .001), which resulted in higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR, 5.16; 95% CI, 2.62 to 10.15; P < .001) and worse overall survival (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.66 to 4.78; P < .001). Similarly, a maximum body temperature≥40.5°C was significantly associated with lower neutrophil recovery (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.79; P = .002), lower platelet recovery (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.79; P = .001), higher incidence of grades III to IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.24 to 6.88; P = .013), and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.22 to 4.97; P = .011), which resulted in higher NRM (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.53 to 7.67; P = .002). Maximum CRP level and maximum body temperature during neutropenia were significantly associated with lower hematopoietic recovery and higher NRM following single-unit CBT in adults. Further studies are warranted to explore early intervention strategies aimed at preventing severe inflammation and improving post-transplant outcomes in single-unit CBT.

Lung transplant outcomes are influenced by severity of neutropenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment

Although neutropenia is a common complication after lung transplant, its relationship with recipient outcomes remains understudied. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 228 adult lung transplant recipients between 2008 and 2013 to assess the association of neutropenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) treatment with outcomes. Neutropenia was categorized as mild (absolute neutrophil count 1000-1499), moderate (500-999), or severe (<500) and as a time-varying continuous variable. Associations with survival, acute rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were assessed with the use of Cox proportional hazards regression. GCSF therapy impact on survival, CLAD, and acute rejection development was analyzed by propensity score matching. Of 228 patients, 101 (42.1%) developed neutropenia. Recipients with severe neutropenia had higher mortality rates than those of recipients with no (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.41, P = .040), mild (aHR 14.508, 95% CI 1.58-13.34, P = .018), or moderate (aHR 3.27, 95% CI 0.89-12.01, P = .074) neutropenia. Surprisingly, GCSF treatment was associated with a higher risk for CLAD in mildly neutropenic patients (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 0.93-13.04, P = .063), although it did decrease death risk in severely neutropenic patients (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.88, P = .031). Taken together, our data point to an important relationship between neutropenia severity and GCSF treatment in lung transplant outcomes.