Benchmarking of survival outcomes following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A review of existing processes and the introduction of an international system from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

Optimising survivorship post-BMT: healthcare professionals' perceptions of long-term care

Survivors who have received a blood or marrow transplant (BMT) require life-long follow-up care and support, however evidence-based assessments of long-term models of care are scarce. This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives of blood and marrow transplant (BMT) specialist nurses and physicians, and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding the long-term management and follow-up care of BMT survivors. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with thirteen purposefully selected BMT Physicians (n = 4), Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) (n = 6) and GPs (n = 3), experienced in providing long-term care to BMT survivors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Both specialist and community-based practitioners identified deficiencies in models of care delivery and in the organisation of long-term care for BMT survivors, particularly in relation to communication, transition and personalisation of care. Two themes were identified that explored (1) Efficiency and quality of current care provision for BMT survivors and (2) Characteristics of optimal care. All participants recognised the need for flexible, patient-centred models of shared care that bring together hospital and community-based healthcare professionals in providing optimal care to BMT survivors. The growing population of survivors of BMT requires an urgent re-evaluation of healthcare models to address their complex long-term care needs. This will require a well-trained primary care-based workforce supported by collaborative relationships with specialist centres and easy access to essential information. Current approaches to post-BMT care that limit provision of care to specialist BMT services are unsustainable, inefficient, and do not support the transition of patients from tertiary to community healthcare services.

Utilization of hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy technology in Europe and associated Countries. Using the 2022 activity survey data to correlate with economic and demographic factors. A report from the EBMT

We looked at treatment rates and center density across countries for patients treated in 2022; 46,143 HCTs (19,011 (41.2%) allogeneic, 27,132 (58.8%) autologous) reported by 689 centers. 4329 patients received advanced cellular therapies, 3205 were CAR-T. We found considerable differences in utilization of autologous, allogeneic HCT and more so for CAR-T. Differences in procedure type and for allogeneic HCT in donor use and disease indication are highlighted. For instance, countries with the highest use of unrelated donors per 10 million inhabitants were Germany (297) and the Netherlands (230), for identical sibling HCT it was Israel (148) and Lebanon (113), for haploidentical it was Israel (94) and Italy (94) and for cord blood it was the Netherlands (24) and the United Kingdom (15). We looked at HCT use for specific indications in allogeneic HCT (AML CR1, MDS, MPN and BMF). We correlated treatment rates with GNI and with demographic age structure and show correlations in HCT and CAR-T use and center density, highest in Italy for allogeneic and autologous HCT and in Switzerland for CAR-T. Resource restricted countries tend to concentrate HCT use in a limited number of centers. These data are useful for comparisons across countries.

In Pursuit of Optimal Outcomes: A Framework for Quality Standards in Immune Effector Cell Therapy

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapy represents a transformative advancement in oncology, leveraging the immune system to combat various malignancies. This article outlines a comprehensive framework for establishing and maintaining quality standards in IEC therapy amidst rapid scientific and clinical advancements. We emphasize the integration of structured process measures, robust quality assurance, and meticulous outcome evaluation to ensure treatment efficacy and safety. Key components include multidisciplinary expertise, stringent accreditation protocols, and advanced data management systems, which facilitate standardized reporting and continual innovation. The collaborative effort among stakeholders-ranging from patients and healthcare providers to regulatory bodies-is crucial in delivering high-quality IEC therapies. This framework aims to enhance patient outcomes and cement the role of IEC therapy as a cornerstone of modern oncology, promoting continuous improvement and adherence to high standards across the therapeutic spectrum.

Trends in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation survival using population-based descriptive epidemiology method: analysis of national transplant registry data

Prognosis for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been improving. Short-term survival information, such as crude survival rates that consider deaths immediately after the transplantation, may not be sufficiently useful for assessing long-term survival. Using the data of the Japanese HCT registry, the net survival rate of patients who survived for a given period was determined according to age, disease, and type of transplant. We included a total of 41,716 patients who received their first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation between 1991 and 2015. For each disease, age group, graft source subcategory, net survival was calculated using the Pohar-Perme method, and 5-year conditional net survival (CS) was calculated. Ten-year net survivals of total patient cohort were 41.5% and 47.4% for males and females, respectively. Except for myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, 5-year CS for 5-year transplant survivors exceeded 90%. CS was especially high for aplastic anemia, of which was over 100% for children and younger adults receiving cord blood, suggesting that these patients have similar longevity to an equivalent group from the general population. These findings provide useful information for long-term survival, and can serve as benchmark for comparisons among registries, including other cancers.

The role of registries in hematological disorders

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was developed more than 65 years ago to treat malignant blood disorders and irreversible bone marrow failures, with the aim of replacing a diseased hematopoietic system with a healthy one (allogeneic HCT). Decades later, the procedure was adapted to apply maximal chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which would result in bone marrow failure, but could be remedied by an infusion of a patient's own cryopreserved bone marrow (autologous HCT). Both treatments are high-risk and complex, especially during the initial phases. However, concerted efforts, vision, and collaboration between physicians and centers worldwide have resulted in HCT becoming a standard of care for many hematological disorders with progressive improvements in outcomes. Registries and the collaboration of societies worldwide have enabled the delivery of this curative therapy to many patients with fatal hematological diseases. More than 1.5 million HCT were performed between 1957 and 2019, and activity is continuously increasing worldwide.

Hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are rarely associated with hematologic malignancies. In their rarity, lymphomas are the diseases with more frequent paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome. High-risk antibodies are absent in most lymphoma-associated paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, with the exception of antibodies to Tr/DNER in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, mGluR5 in limbic encephalitis, and mGluR1 in some cerebellar ataxias. Peripheral nervous system paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are rare and heterogeneous, with a prevalence of demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, skin changes (POEMS) is a rare, paraneoplastic syndrome due to an underlying plasma cell disorder. The diagnosis is based on defined criteria, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), not an antibody, is considered a reliable diagnostic marker that also mirrors therapy response. As with the paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes in solid tumors, therapies rely on cancer treatment associated with immunomodulatory treatment with better response in PNS with antibodies to surface antigens. The best outcome is generally present in Ophelia syndrome/limbic encephalitis with anti-mGluR5 antibodies, with frequent complete recovery. Besides patients with isolated osteosclerotic lesions (where radiotherapy is indicated), hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the therapy of choice in patients with POEMS syndrome. In the paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors, discontinuation of the drug together with immunomodulatory treatment is recommended.

Predicting Patient Death after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Inborn Errors Using Machine Learning (PREPAD): A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Inborn Errors Working Party Study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment for many inborn errors of immunity, metabolism, and hematopoiesis. No predictive models are available for these disorders. We created a machine learning model using XGBoost to predict survival after HSCT using European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant registry data of 10,888 patients who underwent HSCT for inborn errors between 2006 and 2018, and compared it to a simple linear Cox model, an elastic net Cox model, and a random forest model. The XGBoost model had a cross-validated area under the curve value of .73 at 1 year, which was significantly superior to the other models, and it accurately predicted for countries excluded while training. It predicted close to 0% and >30% mortality more often than other models at 1 year, while maintaining good calibration. The 5-year survival was 94.7% in the 25% of patients at lowest risk and 62.3% in the 25% at highest risk. Within disease and donor subgroups, XGBoost outperformed the best univariate predictor. We visualized the effect of the main predictors-diagnosis, performance score, patient age and donor type-using the SHAP ML explainer and developed a stand-alone application, which can predict using the model and visualize predictions. The risk of mortality after HSCT for inborn errors can be accurately predicted using an explainable machine learning model. This exceeds the performance of models described in the literature. Doing so can help detect deviations from expected survival and improve risk stratification in trials.

Trends in Outcome of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: 5000 Transplantations and 30 Years of Single-Center Experience

In this single-center analysis, we evaluated the trends in 5185 hematopoietic cell transplantations performed between 1990 and 2022. The study group comprised 3237 allogeneic (alloHCT) and 1948 autologous (autoHCT) hematopoietic cell transplantations. In the multivariate analysis, there was an improvement in event-free-survival (EFS) after autoHCT (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.7, p < 0.0001) due to reduced cumulative incidence of relapse in the last five years (56% in 2010-2014 vs. 38% in 2015-2022). An improvement in EFS after alloHCT over time was observed (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.48, p < 0.0001), which was due to reduced non-relapse mortality. No difference in cumulative relapse incidence was observed over the last decade for allografted patients. Survival after autoHCT improved in Hodgkin's disease (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.1-0.3), multiple myeloma (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) and solid tumors (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), while after alloHCT, improvement was observed in acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5), Hodgkin's disease (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.4), non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.6), inborn diseases (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.4) and acquired aplastic anemia with matched related donors and matched unrelated donors (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.8).

Automating outcome analysis after stem cell transplantation: The YORT tool

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a high-risk procedure. Auditing and yearly outcome reviews help keep optimal quality of care and come with increased survival, but also has significant recurring costs. When data has been entered in a standardized registry, outcome analyses can be automated, which reduces work and increases standardization of performed analyses. To achieve this, we created the Yearly Outcome Review Tool (YORT), an offline, graphical tool that gets data from a single center EBMT registry export, allows the user to define filters and groups, and performs standardized analyses for overall survival, event-free survival, engraftment, relapse rate and non-relapse mortality, complications including acute and chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD), and data completeness. YORT allows users to export data as analyzed to allow you to check data and perform manual analyses. We show the use of this tool on a two-year single-center pediatric cohort, demonstrating how the results for both overall and event-free survival and engraftment can be visualized. The current work demonstrates that using registry data, standardized tools can be made to analyze this data, which allows users to perform outcome reviews for local and accreditation purposes graphically with minimal effort, and help perform detailed standardized analyses. The tool is extensible to be able to accommodate future changes in outcome review and center-specific extensions.

Quantifying the available capacity and resource needs for provision of CAR-T therapies in the National Health Service in Spain: a survey-based study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the readiness of Spanish National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to provide chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T), and to identify and quantify the different resources needed to provide CAR-T considering three scenarios defined by 10, 25 and 50 patients per centre per year.

DESIGN

Targeted literature review and quantitative study using a questionnaire and telephone interviews. An algorithm was created to determine hospitals' readiness based on their capacity and capability. All the requirements for quantification were assessed and validated by the steering committee, formed by members of the Spanish Group of Haematopoietic Transplantation and Cell Therapy. A weighting system (from 0 to 1) was established for capability quantification. For resources quantification, a scoring system was established, with 0 points representing the minimum and 3 points the maximum of additional resources that a hospital indicated necessary.

SETTING

40 Spanish hospital centres that perform allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were invited to complete the questionnaire for capacity quantification, 28 of which provided valid responses. Nine hospitals participated in the interviews for resource quantification, eight of which had previously been designated by the Ministry of Health (MoH) to provide CAR-T.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Current capacity of NHS Spanish sites to administer CAR-T under different theoretical scenarios with varying numbers of procedures, and the potential healthcare resources that would be needed to realise the theoretical capacity requirements.

RESULTS

Four hospitals were optimally ready, 17 were somewhat ready and 7 were not ready. The actual extrapolated capacity of the currently designated MoH CAR-T sites would allow treatment of approximately 250 patients per year. Regarding healthcare resource needs, the numbers of haematologists, nurses and beds were the most important limiting factors, and those requiring further growth as patient numbers increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of CAR-T-qualified centres and/or increasing resources in the current designated sites are two potential strategies that should be considered to treat CAR-T-eligible patients in Spain.

Handling missing covariate data in clinical studies in haematology

Missing data are frequently encountered across studies in clinical haematology. Failure to handle these missing values in an appropriate manner can complicate the interpretation of a study's findings, as estimates presented may be biased and/or imprecise. In the present work, we first provide an overview of current methods for handling missing covariate data, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore, a systematic review is presented, exploring both contemporary reporting of missing values in major haematological journals, and the methods used for handling them. A principal finding was that the method of handling missing data was explicitly specified in a minority of articles (in 76 out of 195 articles reporting missing values, 39%). Among these, complete case analysis and the missing indicator method were the most common approaches to dealing with missing values, with more complex methods such as multiple imputation being extremely rare (in 7 out of 195 articles). An example analysis (with associated code) is also provided using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation data, illustrating the different approaches to handling missing values. We conclude with various recommendations regarding the reporting and handling of missing values for future studies in clinical haematology.

Benchmarking of survival outcomes following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): an update of the ongoing project of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

From 2016 EBMT and JACIE developed an international risk-adapted benchmarking program of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcome to provide individual EBMT Centers with a means of quality-assuring the HSCT process and meeting FACT-JACIE accreditation requirements relating to 1-year survival outcomes. Informed by previous experience from Europe, North America and Australasia, the Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) established criteria for patient and Center selection, and a set of key clinical variables within a dedicated statistical model adapted to the capabilities of the EBMT Registry. The first phase of the project was launched in 2019 to test the acceptability of the benchmarking model through assessment of Centers' performance for 1-year data completeness and survival outcomes of autologous and allogeneic HSCT covering 2013-2016. A second phase was delivered in July 2021 covering 2015-2019 and including survival outcomes. Reports of individual Center performance were shared directly with local principal investigators and their responses were assimilated. The experience thus far has supported the feasibility, acceptability and reliability of the system as well as identifying its limitations. We provide a summary of experience and learning so far in this 'work in progress', as well as highlighting future challenges of delivering a modern, robust, data-complete, risk-adapted benchmarking program across new EBMT Registry systems.

Multiple imputation for cause-specific Cox models: Assessing methods for estimation and prediction

In studies analyzing competing time-to-event outcomes, interest often lies in both estimating the effects of baseline covariates on the cause-specific hazards and predicting cumulative incidence functions. When missing values occur in these baseline covariates, they may be discarded as part of a complete-case analysis or multiply imputed. In the latter case, the imputations may be performed either compatibly with a substantive model pre-specified as a cause-specific Cox model [substantive model compatible fully conditional specification (SMC-FCS)], or approximately so [multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE)]. In a large simulation study, we assessed the performance of these three different methods in terms of estimating cause-specific regression coefficients and predicting cumulative incidence functions. Concerning regression coefficients, results provide further support for use of SMC-FCS over MICE, particularly when covariate effects are large and the baseline hazards of the competing events are substantially different. Complete-case analysis also shows adequate performance in settings where missingness is not outcome dependent. With regard to cumulative incidence prediction, SMC-FCS and MICE are performed more similarly, as also evidenced in the illustrative analysis of competing outcomes following a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The findings are discussed alongside recommendations for practising statisticians.

Access to and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: an EBMT position paper

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic approach in the treatment of multiple myeloma, and the recent approval of the first two CAR T-cell products could result in improved outcomes. However, it remains a complex and expensive technology, which poses challenges to health-care systems and society in general, especially in times of crises. This potentially accelerates pre-existing inequalities as access to CAR T-cell therapy varies, both between countries, depending on the level of economic development, and within countries, due to structural disparities in access to quality health care-a parameter strongly correlated with socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and lifestyle. Here, we identify two important issues: affordability and access to CAR T-cell treatment. This consensus statement from clinical investigators, clinicians, nurses, and patients from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) proposes solutions as part of an innovative collaborative strategy to make CAR T-cell therapy accessible to all patients with multiple myeloma.

Activity and Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Private Sector in Australia

BACKGROUND

Few Australasian Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) programs perform ASCTs in the private sector. Relatively little is known about ASCT outcomes in the private sector, which varies in care delivery models to the public system.

AIMS

We investigated transplantation activity and survival outcomes at Icon Cancer Centre's Brisbane-based private clinical and laboratory ASCT program, over a 23-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of all adults who underwent ASCT at Icon between 1996-2018. Main outcome measures were transplant activity, overall survival (OS) and day-100 and 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM). Outcomes were benchmarked against the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR).

RESULTS

Between 1996-2018, 1676 ASCTs were performed in 1454 patients. From 2010-2018, ASCTs performed at Icon contributed 40% of all South East Queensland ASCTs. In the last 5-years, 21% of Icon's patients were ≥70-years, compared to 5% across Australasia. For the entire cohort, 100-day, and 1-year TRM was 1.1% and 1.7% respectively, whilst for those aged ≥70-years, it was 2.0% and 3.1%. For ASCTs performed between 2014-2018, 100-day and 1-year TRM was 0.8% and 1.4%, which was half the TRM rates reported by the ABMTRR. The 10-year post-transplant OS at Icon was higher than the ABMTRR data, across all disease subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Icon is the largest ASCT contributor in Queensland, with excellent OS and low TRM, demonstrating the critical role of the private sector in the administration of this highly complex therapy. The Icon ASCT program is inclusive of patients aged ≥70-years, demonstrating low and acceptable TRM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Benchmarking survival outcomes: A funnel plot for survival data

Benchmarking is commonly used in many healthcare settings to monitor clinical performance, with the aim of increasing cost-effectiveness and safe care of patients. The funnel plot is a popular tool in visualizing the performance of a healthcare center in relation to other centers and to a target, taking into account statistical uncertainty. In this paper, we develop a methodology for constructing funnel plots for survival data. The method takes into account censoring and can deal with differences in censoring distributions across centers. Practical issues in implementing the methodology are discussed, particularly in the setting of benchmarking clinical outcomes for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A simulation study is performed to assess the performance of the funnel plots under several scenarios. Our methodology is illustrated using data from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation benchmarking project.

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapies in Europe 2020: a report from the EBMT activity survey

In 2020, 45,364 HCT in 41,016 patients, 18,796 (41%) allogeneic and 26,568 (59%) autologous in 690 centers were reported. Changes observed were as follows: total number of HCT −6.5%, allogeneic HCT −5.1%, autologous HCT −7.5%, and were more pronounced in non-malignant disorders for allogeneic HCT and in autoimmune disease for autologous HCT. Main indications were myeloid malignancies 10,441 (25%), lymphoid malignancies 26,120 (64%) and non-malignant disorders 2532 (6%). A continued growth in CAR-T cellular therapies to 1874 (+65%) patients in 2020 was observed. In allogeneic HCT, the use of haploidentical donors increased while use of unrelated and sibling donors decreased. Cord blood HCT increased by 11.7% for the first time since 2012. There was a significant increase in the use of non-myeloablative but a drop in myeloablative conditioning and in use of marrow as stem cell source. We interpreted these changes as being due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic starting early in 2020 in Europe and provided additional data reflecting the varying impact of the pandemic across selected countries and larger cities. The transplant community confronted with the pandemic challenge, continued in providing patients access to treatment. This annual report of the EBMT reflects current activities useful for health care planning.

Increasing access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant: an international perspective

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a highly complex, costly procedure for patients with oncologic, hematologic, genetic, and immunologic diseases. Demographics and socioeconomic status as well as donor availability and type of health care system are important factors that influence access to and outcomes following allo-HCT. The last decade has seen an increase in the numbers of allo-HCTs and teams all over the world, with no signs of saturation. More than 80 000 procedures are being performed annually, with 1 million allo-HCTs estimated to take place by the end of 2024. Many factors have contributed to this, including increased numbers of eligible patients (older adults with or without comorbidities) and available donors (unrelated and haploidentical), improved supportive care, and decreased early and late post-HCT mortalities. This increase is also directly linked to macro- and microeconomic indicators that affect health care both regionally and globally. Despite this global increase in the number of allo-HCTs and transplant centers, there is an enormous need for increased access to and improved outcomes following allo-HCT in resource-constrained countries. The reduction of poverty, global economic changes, greater access to information, exchange of technologies, and use of artificial intelligence, mobile health, and telehealth are certainly creating unprecedented opportunities to establish collaborations and share experiences and thus increase patient access to allo-HCT. A specific research agenda to address issues of allo-HCT in resource-constrained settings is urgently warranted.

A real-life overview of a hematopoietic cell transplant program throughout a four-year period, including prospective registry, exclusion causes and final donor selection

Traceability of patients who are candidates for Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is crucial to ensure HCT program quality. Continuous knowledge of both a detailed registry from a HCT program and final exclusion causes can contribute to promoting a real-life vision and optimizing patient and donor selection. We analyzed epidemiological data reported in a 4 year-monocentric prospective registry, which included all patients presented as candidates for autologous (Auto) and/or allogeneic (Allo) HCT. A total of 543 patients were considered for HCT: 252 (42.4%) for Allo and 291 (57.6%) for Auto. A total of 98 (38.9%) patients were excluded from AlloHCT due to basal disease progression more commonly (18.2%). Seventy-six (30.2%) patients had an HLA identical sibling, whereas 147 (58.3%) patients had only Haplo. UD research was performed in 106 (42%) cases, significantly more often in myeloid than lymphoid malignancies (57% vs 28.7%, p < 0.001) but 61.3% were finally canceled, due to donor or disease causes in 72.4%. With respect to Auto candidates, a total of 60 (20.6%) patients were finally excluded; progression was the most common cause (12%). Currently, Haplo is the most frequent donor type. The high cancellation rate of UD research should be revised to optimize further donor algorithms.

Standardization and Accreditation in Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - an Asia Pacific Perspective

Standardization and formal accreditation of practices related to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and therapies using hematopoietic-derived cellular products aim to promote quality in clinical and laboratory practice and provide knowledge to all stakeholders of centers. This article refers to three aspects of these processes starting with the importance of accurate viable CD 34 enumeration in HSCT. A highly accurate method of enumeration and a robust EQAS program is required, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic. The second section shares experiences with FACT-JACIE accreditation at the Singapore General Hospital demonstrating how accreditation is part of continuous improvement and not only a destination. This journey can be difficult in many HSCT centers of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) because of the intensive and rigorous requirements of the internationally accredited models. Hence, in LMICs, a staged movement toward establishing such standards must be considered. This approach is presented in the third section of the article with data on the current situation in countries reporting to the APBMT registry.

Visions for a JACIE Quality Management System 4.0

Quality management has been part of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from the very beginning. It evolved step-wise from open data exchange up to the introduction of the FACT/JACIE-based quality management system (QMS) 2 decades ago. This formal step has eased cooperation, and improved outcome for patients. Today’s expansion of cellular and targeted therapies and new drugs, and the regulatory requirements for advanced therapeutic medicinal products have touched the limits of the current system. Based on the Medicine 4.0 concept, the next step should integrate novel views of QMS. The old definition “Best Quality Transplant” will be replaced by “Optimal Treatment,” and encompass the entire health care journey. “Best outcome” will refer to overall survival, quality of life and costs, with or without HSCT, and will be compatible with all requirements by competent authorities. Decisions will be based on high-level evidence, supported by real-time digitized data collection, data analysis, incorporated into artificial-intelligence systems. To reach this goal, EBMT/JACIE will be challenged to start the process by further fostering harmonization within and between organizations at institutional, national, and European levels. Acceleration in information technology and modifications to working practices during the pandemic should facilitate this development to the next stage.

Predictive factors for vaccine failure to guide vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Vaccination after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is essential to protect high-risk patients against potentially lethal infections. Though multiple studies have evaluated vaccine specific responses, no comprehensive analysis of a complete vaccination schedule post-HSCT has been performed and little is known about predictors for vaccine failure. In this context, allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) patients were included and vaccinated starting one year post-transplantation. Antibody responses were measured by Multiplex Immuno Assay for pneumococcal (PCV13), meningococcal C, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and Haemophilus influenza type b one month after the last vaccination and correlated to clinical and immunological parameters. Vaccine failure was defined as antibody response above vaccine-specific cut-off values for less than four out of six vaccines. Ninety-six patients were included of which 27.1% was found to have vaccine failure. Only 40.6% of all patients responded adequately to all six vaccines. In multivariate analysis, viral reactivation post-HSCT (OR 6.53; P = 0.03), B-cells <135 per mm³ (OR 7.24; P = 0.00) and NK-cells <170 per mm³ (OR 11.06; P = 0.00) were identified as predictors for vaccine failure for vaccination at one year post-alloHSCT. Measurement of antibody responses and an individualized approach for revaccination guided by clinical status and immune reconstitution of B-cells and NK-cells may improve vaccine responses.

Infection-Related Mortality in Adults and Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Australian Registry Report

Infection-related mortality (IRM) is the most common non-relapse-related cause of death reported after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Information on the incidence and timing of specific infective organisms and the risk factors for IRM is essential to developing prevention strategies. This report provides the first account of IRM in adults and children undergoing HCT in Australia. Between 2013 and 2018, 2705 adult and 689 pediatric first HCTs were identified from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry database, associated with 1075 (39.7%) total overall deaths in adults and 134 (19.4%) in children. Demographics and causes of death, including infectious etiology and causative organisms, were extracted from the database for adults and children for analysis. At day +100 and 1 year post-HCT, IRM was the leading cause of early post-HCT mortality in adults, accounting for 6.2% and 9.8%, respectively; in children, IRM was the leading cause of post-HCT mortality at day +100 at 2.5% and the second highest cause of post-HCT mortality at 1 year post-HCT at 4.9%, following relapse at 5.8%. In adults, older age, transplantation not in a first complete remission (non-CR1), the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab, donor-positive/recipient-negative cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, and acute graft-versus-host disease were significant risk factors for IRM. However, in children, age >5 years, acute lymphocytic leukemia as the primary disease, and mismatched unrelated or haploidentical donor source were predictive of IRM. Of the deaths in which an infectious etiology was reported in adults (52.4%), 49.3% were attributed to bacteria, 25.3% to fungus, 21.7% to viruses, and 3.6% to post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The most common organisms were Pseudomonas spp, Enterococcus spp, Candida spp, Aspergillus spp, and CMV. In children where an infectious etiology was reported (64%), 13% were attributed to bacteria, 26% to fungus, 45% to viruses, and 16% to PTLD. This report highlights that IRM was the leading cause of death early post-HCT in Australia. Strategies to reduce IRM, such as individualized pre-transplantation infection risk assessment, rapid diagnostics, and prevention management strategies should be explored to determine whether these outcomes can be improved. In addition, improving the completeness and accuracy of reported data, particularly for infectious pathogens, could assist in directing management strategies to reduce IRM in HCT.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Platforms With Ex Vivo and In Vivo Immune Manipulations: Count and Adjust

Various allogeneic (allo) stem cell transplantation platforms have been developed over the last 2 decades. In this review we focus on the impact of in vivo and ex vivo graft manipulation on immune reconstitution and clinical outcome. Strategies include anti-thymocyte globulin- and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based regimens, as well as graft engineering, such as CD34 selection and CD19/αβT cell depletion. Differences in duration of immune suppression, reconstituting immune repertoires, and associated graft-versus-leukemia effects and toxicities mediated through viral reactivations are highlighted. In addition, we discuss the impact of different reconstituting repertoires on donor lymphocyte infusions and post allo pharmacological interventions to enhance tumor control. We advocate for precisely counting all graft ingredients and therapeutic drug monitoring during conditioning in the peripheral blood, and for adjusting dosing accordingly on an individual basis. In addition, we propose novel trial designs to better assess the impact of variations in transplantation platforms in order to better learn from our diversity of "counts" and potential "adjustments." This will, in the future, allow daily clinical practice, strategic choices, and future trial designs to be based on data guided decisions, rather than relying on dogma and habits.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy survey of the EBMT: monitoring of activities and trends over 30 years

Numbers of Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in Europe and collaborating countries continues to rise with 48,512 HCT in 43,581 patients, comprising of 19,798 (41%) allogeneic and 28,714 (59%) autologous, reported by 700 centers in 51 countries during 2019. Main indications were myeloid malignancies 10,764 (25%), lymphoid malignancies 27,895 (64%), and nonmalignant disorders 3173 (7%). A marked growth in CAR-T cellular therapies from 151 in 2017 to 1134 patients in 2019 is observed. This year’s analyses focus on changes over 30 years. Since the first survey in 1990 where 143 centers reported 4234 HCT, the number has increased to 700 centers and 48,512 HCT. Transplants were reported in 20 countries in 1990, and 51, 30 years later. More than 800,000 HCT in 715,000 patients were reported overall. Next to the massive expansion of HCT technology, most notable developments include the success of unrelated donor and haploidentical HCT, an increase followed by decrease in the number of cord blood transplants, use of reduced intensity HCT in older patients, and the phenomenal rise in cellular therapy. This annual report of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) reflects current activity and highlights important trends vital for health care planning.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Sclerosis: Recommendations of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society

Importance

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) for multiple sclerosis has gained increasing interest in recent years. Despite the availability of many US Food and Drug Administration-approved disease-modifying therapies, some patients do not respond adequately and others may have very early aggressive disease that prompts consideration of alternative, highly effective, long-lasting therapy. The National Medical Advisory Committee of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society has reviewed recent literature on AHSCT for the purpose of making recommendations about its use based on current knowledge, as well as pointing out areas of controversy and issues requiring further research.

Observations

Studies on AHSCT have repeatedly demonstrated high efficacy and a durable outcome in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Recent studies have shown considerable improvement in the safety of the procedure, with much lower mortality rates than were reported earlier. Consensus is emerging about the characteristics of the best candidates for the procedure. Questions remain about the ideal protocol, particularly about the best conditioning regimen to be used to kill immune cells. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to address the question of whether AHSCT has advantages over the most efficacious disease-modifying agents currently available. One such trial (Best Available Therapy Versus Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Sclerosis [BEAT-MS) is currently in progress.

Conclusions and Relevance

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society believes that AHSCT may be a useful treatment option for people with relapsing multiple sclerosis who demonstrate substantial breakthrough disease activity (ie, new inflammatory central nervous system lesions and/or clinical relapses) despite treatment with high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy or have contraindications to high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies. The best candidates are likely people younger than 50 years with shorter durations of disease (<10 years). The procedure should only be performed at centers with substantial experience and expertise. Ideally, recipients of the procedure should be entered into a single database, and further research is needed to establish ideal cell mobilization and immune-conditioning regimens.

Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT)

The role of spleen size and splenectomy for the prediction of post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) outcome in myelofibrosis remains under debate. In EBMT registry, we identified a cohort of 1195 myelofibrosis patients transplanted between 2000-2017 after either fludarabine-busulfan or fludarabine-melphalan regimens. Overall, splenectomy was performed in 202 (16.9%) patients and its use decreased over time (28.3% in 2000-2009 vs 14.1% in 2010-2017 period). By multivariate analysis, splenectomy was associated with less NRM (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, P = .018) but increased risk of relapse (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.02, P = .042), with no significant impact on OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.12, P = .274). However, in subset analysis comparing the impact of splenectomy vs specific spleen sizes, for patients with progressive disease, an improved survival was seen in splenectomised subjects compared to those patients with a palpable spleen length ≥ 15 cm (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, P < .001), caused by a significant reduction in NRM (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49, P < .001), without significantly increased relapse risk (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.87-2.49, P = .147). Overall, despite the possible biases typical of retrospective cohorts, this study highlights the potential detrimental effect of massive splenomegaly in transplant outcome and supports the role of splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with progressive disease and large splenomegaly.

Survivorship care for allogeneic transplant patients in the UK NHS: changes centre practice, impact of health service policy and JACIE accreditation over 5 years

Care of long-term survivors of allogeneic transplant is known to be variable despite international guidelines and accreditation standards. In 2014 a survey of UK NHS-based adult transplant centres identified significant barriers to delivery of long-term follow-up services. In 2019, we repeated the survey to assess changes over a 5-year period when health service policies had mandated JACIE accreditation incorporating standards for long-term care. Improvements were seen in the number of centres having a dedicated long-term follow-up clinic for allogeneic transplant recipients (52% versus 33%) and a standard operating procedure (88% versus 69%). Inclusion of psychological support in standard operating procedures remained low at both time points (32% versus 28%). There was ongoing variation in practice regarding vaccination programmes, access to cancer screening, and audit processes between centres. Perceived barriers to implementation of comprehensive long-term follow-up clinics were similar in 2019; mainly resourcing clinical staff and psychological support. Whilst the survey reflects the changing practice of transplant centres, best explained by increasing recognition of late effects and survivorship by clinicians, health service policy and JACIE accreditation standards, further developments are warranted to address unmet healthcare needs of long-term HSCT survivors, especially access to psychological support, cancer screening and vaccinations.