Survey of perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia

Patient Perceptions of Emerging Gene Therapies for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

No disease-specific therapy currently exists for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), a progressive cardiogenetic condition conferring elevated risk for ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Emerging gene therapies have the potential to fill this gap. However, little is known about how adults with ARVC, or any other inherited cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia syndrome, appraise the risks and benefits of gene therapy research and which considerations may influence their decisions about clinical trial participation.

METHODS

Twenty adults with clinically diagnosed and gene-positive ARVC participated in semi-structured interviews that explored perceptions of gene therapy and hypothetical decision-making for gene therapy clinical trial participation. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Participants expressed enthusiasm for gene therapy with varied levels of personal interest in trial participation. Although clinical severity appeared to be associated with an elevated interest in early trial participation, participants anticipated weighing both personal and trial-specific factors including life stage, trial stage, risks, benefits, participation burden, study leadership, and anticipated cost of future gene therapy. Adaptation to living with ARVC and involvement in the ARVC patient community were also relevant to decision-making about trial participation. Potential ethical concerns included unquestioning trust in clinical teams collaborating on industry-led trials and vulnerability of those recently diagnosed or with high perceived severity of ARVC symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Several characteristics of the individual and trial warrant consideration during the informed consent process. Insights from this study may affect trial planning and communication with participants who have inherited cardiac conditions.

EQ-5D-5L health utility scores in Australian adults with inherited retinal diseases: A cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

Economic evaluations of interventions for ocular disease require utility scores that accurately represent quality of life in the target population. This study aimed to describe the distribution of EQ-5D-5L utility values among Australian adults with symptomatic inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and to assess the relationship between these scores and vision-related quality of life.

METHODS

A survey was administered predominantly online in 2021. Participants completed the EQ-5D-5L general health utility instrument, the EQ vertical visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25). Self-reported IRD diagnoses were classified as being associated with central or widespread retinal involvement.

RESULTS

Responses from 647 participants aged 18-93 years were included, 50.1% were men and 77.6% had an IRD associated with widespread retinal involvement. The majority reported no problems with self-care and no pain/discomfort but did report anxiety/depression and problems with work, study, housework, or family/leisure activities. Most people with widespread involvement reported problems with mobility. Median EQ-5D-5L utility was 0.88 and 0.91 among people with widespread and central involvement, respectively (age and sex-adjusted p = 0.029); and median EQ-VAS was 75 and 80, respectively (adjusted p = 0.003). A moderate curvilinear correlation was observed between EQ-5D-5L and NEI-VFQ-25 composite score (Spearman's ρ 0.69), but not all people with poor vision-related quality of life had low EQ-5D-5L utility values.

CONCLUSIONS

EQ-5D-5L health utility values are correlated with vision-related quality of life among adults with IRDs. However, the EQ-5D-5L may not be sensitive to the full impact of vision impairment on quality of life.

Vision-related quality of life, photoaversion, and optical rehabilitation in achromatopsia

SIGNIFICANCE

We report on photoaversion and patient-reported quality of life in Danish patients with achromatopsia and evaluate the best optical rehabilitation. Our results contribute to the evaluation of outcome measures in therapy trials and aid in providing the best optical rehabilitation for patients with this and clinically similar conditions.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the vision-related quality of life, the impact of photoaversion on daily living, and the best optical rehabilitation in a cohort of achromatopsia patients, including testing the hypothesis that red light-attenuating filters are generally preferred.

METHODS

Patients with genetically verified achromatopsia were recruited. Investigations included the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire and supplementary questions regarding photoaversion and visual aids. Patients were evaluated by a low vision optometrist and given the choice between different light-attenuating filters. First, two specially designed red and gray filters both transmitting 6% light, and then a pre-defined broader selection of filters. Best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured without filters and with the two trial filters.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients participated. Median 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire composite score was 73, with the lowest median score in the subscale near vision (58) and the highest in ocular pain (100). The majority of patients (88%) reported that light caused them discomfort, and 92% used aid(s) to reduce light. Ninety-six percent (26 of 27) preferred the gray filter to the red indoors; 74% (20 of 27) preferred the gray filter. Contrast sensitivity was significantly better with the gray filter compared with no filter (p=0.003) and the red filter (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort has a relatively high vision-related quality of life compared with other inherited retinal diseases, but photoaversion has a large impact on visual function. Despite what could be expected from a theoretical point of view, red filters are not generally preferred.

A multinational survey of potential participant perspectives on ocular gene therapy

Amidst rapid advancements in ocular gene therapy, understanding patient perspectives is crucial for shaping future treatment choices and research directions. This international cross-sectional survey evaluated knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ocular genetic therapies among potential recipients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Survey instruments included the Attitudes to Gene Therapy-Eye (AGT-Eye), EQ-5D-5L, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), and Patient Attitudes to Clinical Trials (PACT-22) instruments. This study included 496 participant responses (89% adults with IRDs; 11% parents/guardians/carers) from 35 countries, with most from the United States of America (USA; 69%) and the United Kingdom (11%). Most participants (90%) indicated they would likely accept gene therapy if it was available, despite only 45% agreeing that they had good knowledge of gene therapy. The main sources of information were research registries (60% of participants) and the internet (61%). Compared to data from our recently published Australian national survey of people with IRDs (n = 694), USA respondents had higher knowledge of gene therapy outcomes, and Australian respondents indicated a higher perceived value of gene therapy treatments. Addressing knowledge gaps regarding outcomes and financial implications will be central to ensuring informed consent, promoting shared decision-making, and the eventual clinical adoption of genetic therapies.

Patient experiences and perceived value of genetic testing in inherited retinal diseases: a cross-sectional survey

This study evaluated patient experiences with genetic testing for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and the association between underlying knowledge, testing outcomes, and the perceived value of the results. An online survey was distributed to adults with IRDs and parents/guardians of dependents with IRDs who had had genetic testing. Data included details of genetic testing, pre- and post- test perceptions, Decision Regret Scale, perceived value of results, and knowledge of gene therapy. Of 135 responses (85% from adults with IRDs), genetic testing was primarily conducted at no charge through public hospitals (49%) or in a research setting (30%). Key motivations for genetic testing were to confirm IRD diagnosis and to contribute towards research. Those who had received a genetic diagnosis (odds ratio: 6.71; p < 0.001) and those self-reported to have good knowledge of gene therapy (odds ratio: 2.69; p = 0.018) were more likely to have gained confidence in managing their clinical care. For over 80% of respondents, knowing the causative gene empowered them to learn more about their IRD and explore opportunities regarding clinical trials. Key genetic counselling information needs include resources for family communications, structured information provision, and ongoing genetic support, particularly in the context of emerging ocular therapies, to enhance consistency in information uptake.

Short Communication: Lived experience perspectives on genetic testing for a rare eye disease

This qualitative study explored the motivators and barriers for genetic testing for individuals with aniridia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 8 participants. The main findings highlighted the complex and interrelated factors involved in the decision-making process, including family planning, learning about the specific pathogenic variant of the disease and having access to genetic testing. Benefits and potential risks of genetic testing for aniridia were also discussed. For participants, gaining knowledge about their condition was perceived as a benefit, while administrative issues and concerns around privacy were identified as risks. Increased access to quality information about genetic testing and to the service and associated resources are needed to better support people living with aniridia.

Perspectives of carriers of X-linked retinal diseases on genetic testing and gene therapy: A global survey

Female carriers of X-linked inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are burdened with potentially passing their disease-causing variant to future generations, as well as exhibiting signs of retinal disease themselves. This study aimed to investigate carriers' experiences of genetic testing, emotions relating to having affected children, and their knowledge regarding genetic testing and gene therapy. An online survey was advertised to self-identified carriers worldwide. Two hundred and twenty-eight carriers completed the survey with mean age of 51 years (SD ± 15.0). A majority of respondents resided in the United States of America (51%), Australia (19%), and the United Kingdom (14%). Most carriers identified with feelings of guilt (70%), concern (91%), and anxiety (88%) for their child. Female carriers who had given birth to children had significantly greater gene therapy knowledge compared to carriers who had not (p < 0.05). Respondents agreed that their eyecare provider and general practitioner helped them understand their condition (63%), however, few carriers reported receiving psychological counselling (9%) or family planning advice (5%). Most respondents (78%) agreed that gene therapy should be available to carriers. This study emphasises the importance of providing appropriate counselling to female carriers and illustrates the motivation of many to participate in emerging treatment options, such as gene therapy.

Challenges in the Evaluation of Emerging Highly Specialised Technologies: Is There a Role for Living HTA?

There is currently deep uncertainty about the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of highly specialised technologies (HSTs), like gene and cell therapies. These treatments are novel, typically have high upfront costs, the patient populations are small and heterogenous, there is minimal information on their long-term safety and effectiveness, and data are limited and often of poor quality. With the increasing number of these technologies and their high cost burden on governments and health care providers, policy makers are currently walking a decision tightrope. On the one hand, an unfavourable funding decision could potentially limit patient access to life-saving treatments, while on the other, a favourable decision could result in unsustainable budget impacts and perhaps poorer patient health outcomes. Health technology assessment (HTA) is meant to determine the value of a health technology in order to promote an equitable, efficient, and high-quality health system. However, standard HTA processes have failed to mitigate the deep uncertainties associated with these technologies. In this paper, we propose a Living HTA framework to address these challenges. This framework includes a one-off process for making explicit the societal values associated with HSTs. These would inform the decision-making approach, data collection and the development of disease-specific reference models to be used by industry sponsors as the basis for their submissions for public funding. Coverage with an evidence development mechanism is also proposed by which data can be collected in real time to update the reference model on a rolling basis, thereby allowing re-assessment of the clinical and cost effectiveness of individual HSTs. The HTA would be 'live' until the results indicate there is sufficient certainty for the funding decision to be confirmed, the price changed or the funding removed.