1
|
Gou T, Matulis CA, Clark DA. Adaptation to visual sparsity enhances responses to isolated stimuli. Curr Biol 2024; 34:5697-5713.e8. [PMID: 39577424 PMCID: PMC11834764 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
Sensory systems adapt their response properties to the statistics of their inputs. For instance, visual systems adapt to low-order statistics like mean and variance to encode stimuli efficiently or to facilitate specific downstream computations. However, it remains unclear how other statistical features affect sensory adaptation. Here, we explore how Drosophila's visual motion circuits adapt to stimulus sparsity, a measure of the signal's intermittency not captured by low-order statistics alone. Early visual neurons in both ON and OFF pathways alter their responses dramatically with stimulus sparsity, responding positively to both light and dark sparse stimuli but linearly to dense stimuli. These changes extend to downstream ON and OFF direction-selective neurons, which are activated by sparse stimuli of both polarities but respond with opposite signs to light and dark regions of dense stimuli. Thus, sparse stimuli activate both ON and OFF pathways, recruiting a larger fraction of the circuit and potentially enhancing the salience of isolated stimuli. Overall, our results reveal visual response properties that increase the fraction of the circuit responding to sparse, isolated stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Gou
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | | | - Damon A Clark
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brezovec BE, Berger AB, Hao YA, Chen F, Druckmann S, Clandinin TR. Mapping the neural dynamics of locomotion across the Drosophila brain. Curr Biol 2024; 34:710-726.e4. [PMID: 38242122 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Locomotion engages widely distributed networks of neurons. However, our understanding of the spatial architecture and temporal dynamics of the networks that underpin walking remains incomplete. We use volumetric two-photon imaging to map neural activity associated with walking across the entire brain of Drosophila. We define spatially clustered neural signals selectively associated with changes in either forward or angular velocity, demonstrating that neurons with similar behavioral selectivity are clustered. These signals reveal distinct topographic maps in diverse brain regions involved in navigation, memory, sensory processing, and motor control, as well as regions not previously linked to locomotion. We identify temporal trajectories of neural activity that sweep across these maps, including signals that anticipate future movement, representing the sequential engagement of clusters with different behavioral specificities. Finally, we register these maps to a connectome and identify neural networks that we propose underlie the observed signals, setting a foundation for subsequent circuit dissection. Overall, our work suggests a spatiotemporal framework for the emergence and execution of complex walking maneuvers and links this brain-wide neural activity to single neurons and local circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bella E Brezovec
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Andrew B Berger
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Yukun A Hao
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Shaul Druckmann
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Thomas R Clandinin
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Fairchild D200, 299 W. Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aseyev N, Ivanova V, Balaban P, Nikitin E. Current Practice in Using Voltage Imaging to Record Fast Neuronal Activity: Successful Examples from Invertebrate to Mammalian Studies. BIOSENSORS 2023; 13:648. [PMID: 37367013 DOI: 10.3390/bios13060648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
The optical imaging of neuronal activity with potentiometric probes has been credited with being able to address key questions in neuroscience via the simultaneous recording of many neurons. This technique, which was pioneered 50 years ago, has allowed researchers to study the dynamics of neural activity, from tiny subthreshold synaptic events in the axon and dendrites at the subcellular level to the fluctuation of field potentials and how they spread across large areas of the brain. Initially, synthetic voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs) were applied directly to brain tissue via staining, but recent advances in transgenic methods now allow the expression of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), specifically in selected neuron types. However, voltage imaging is technically difficult and limited by several methodological constraints that determine its applicability in a given type of experiment. The prevalence of this method is far from being comparable to patch clamp voltage recording or similar routine methods in neuroscience research. There are more than twice as many studies on VSDs as there are on GEVIs. As can be seen from the majority of the papers, most of them are either methodological ones or reviews. However, potentiometric imaging is able to address key questions in neuroscience by recording most or many neurons simultaneously, thus providing unique information that cannot be obtained via other methods. Different types of optical voltage indicators have their advantages and limitations, which we focus on in detail. Here, we summarize the experience of the scientific community in the application of voltage imaging and try to evaluate the contribution of this method to neuroscience research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolay Aseyev
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Butlerova 5A, Moscow 117485, Russia
| | - Violetta Ivanova
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Butlerova 5A, Moscow 117485, Russia
| | - Pavel Balaban
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Butlerova 5A, Moscow 117485, Russia
| | - Evgeny Nikitin
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Butlerova 5A, Moscow 117485, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu F, Grier HA, Tandon R, Cai C, Agarwal A, Giovannucci A, Kaufman MT, Pandarinath C. A deep learning framework for inference of single-trial neural population dynamics from calcium imaging with subframe temporal resolution. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25:1724-1734. [PMID: 36424431 PMCID: PMC9825112 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01189-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In many areas of the brain, neural populations act as a coordinated network whose state is tied to behavior on a millisecond timescale. Two-photon (2p) calcium imaging is a powerful tool to probe such network-scale phenomena. However, estimating the network state and dynamics from 2p measurements has proven challenging because of noise, inherent nonlinearities and limitations on temporal resolution. Here we describe Recurrent Autoencoder for Discovering Imaged Calcium Latents (RADICaL), a deep learning method to overcome these limitations at the population level. RADICaL extends methods that exploit dynamics in spiking activity for application to deconvolved calcium signals, whose statistics and temporal dynamics are quite distinct from electrophysiologically recorded spikes. It incorporates a new network training strategy that capitalizes on the timing of 2p sampling to recover network dynamics with high temporal precision. In synthetic tests, RADICaL infers the network state more accurately than previous methods, particularly for high-frequency components. In 2p recordings from sensorimotor areas in mice performing a forelimb reach task, RADICaL infers network state with close correspondence to single-trial variations in behavior and maintains high-quality inference even when neuronal populations are substantially reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhu
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Harrison A Grier
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raghav Tandon
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Changjia Cai
- Joint Biomedical Engineering Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Andrea Giovannucci
- Joint Biomedical Engineering Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Closed-Loop Engineering for Advanced Rehabilitation (CLEAR), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
| | - Matthew T Kaufman
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Neuroscience Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Chethan Pandarinath
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Center for Machine Learning, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gonzalez-Suarez AD, Zavatone-Veth JA, Chen J, Matulis CA, Badwan BA, Clark DA. Excitatory and inhibitory neural dynamics jointly tune motion detection. Curr Biol 2022; 32:3659-3675.e8. [PMID: 35868321 PMCID: PMC9474608 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Neurons integrate excitatory and inhibitory signals to produce their outputs, but the role of input timing in this integration remains poorly understood. Motion detection is a paradigmatic example of this integration, since theories of motion detection rely on different delays in visual signals. These delays allow circuits to compare scenes at different times to calculate the direction and speed of motion. Different motion detection circuits have different velocity sensitivity, but it remains untested how the response dynamics of individual cell types drive this tuning. Here, we sped up or slowed down specific neuron types in Drosophila's motion detection circuit by manipulating ion channel expression. Altering the dynamics of individual neuron types upstream of motion detectors increased their sensitivity to fast or slow visual motion, exposing distinct roles for excitatory and inhibitory dynamics in tuning directional signals, including a role for the amacrine cell CT1. A circuit model constrained by functional data and anatomy qualitatively reproduced the observed tuning changes. Overall, these results reveal how excitatory and inhibitory dynamics together tune a canonical circuit computation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob A Zavatone-Veth
- Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Juyue Chen
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | | | - Bara A Badwan
- School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Damon A Clark
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Srinivasan P, Griffin NM, Thakur D, Joshi P, Nguyen-Le A, McCotter S, Jain A, Saeidi M, Kulkarni P, Eisdorfer JT, Rothman J, Montell C, Theogarajan L. An Autonomous Molecular Bioluminescent Reporter (AMBER) for Voltage Imaging in Freely Moving Animals. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2021; 5:e2100842. [PMID: 34761564 PMCID: PMC8858017 DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202100842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Genetically encoded reporters have greatly increased our understanding of biology. While fluorescent reporters have been widely used, photostability and phototoxicity have hindered their use in long-term experiments. Bioluminescence overcomes some of these challenges but requires the addition of an exogenous luciferin limiting its use. Using a modular approach, Autonomous Molecular BioluminEscent Reporter (AMBER), an indicator of membrane potential is engineered. Unlike other bioluminescent systems, AMBER is a voltage-gated luciferase coupling the functionalities of the Ciona voltage-sensing domain (VSD) and bacterial luciferase, luxAB. When co-expressed with the luciferin-producing genes, AMBER reversibly switches the bioluminescent intensity as a function of membrane potential. Using biophysical and biochemical methods, it is shown that AMBER switches its enzymatic activity from an OFF to an ON state as a function of the membrane potential. Upon depolarization, AMBER switches from a low to a high enzymatic activity state, showing a several-fold increase in the bioluminescence output (ΔL/L). AMBER in the pharyngeal muscles and mechanosensory touch neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans is expressed. Using the compressed sensing approach, the electropharingeogram of the C. elegans pharynx is reconstructed, validating the sensor in vivo. Thus, AMBER represents the first fully genetically encoded bioluminescent reporter without requiring exogenous luciferin addition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasanna Srinivasan
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
- Center for Bioengineering, Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Nicole M Griffin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
- Center for Bioengineering, Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Dhananjay Thakur
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
- The Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Pradeep Joshi
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Alex Nguyen-Le
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
- Current address: Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sean McCotter
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Akshar Jain
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Mitra Saeidi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Prajakta Kulkarni
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Jaclyn T. Eisdorfer
- College of Creative Studies,University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Current address: Dept. of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
| | - Joel Rothman
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Craig Montell
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
- The Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| | - Luke Theogarajan
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
- Center for Bioengineering, Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zavatone-Veth JA, Badwan BA, Clark DA. A minimal synaptic model for direction selective neurons in Drosophila. J Vis 2020; 20:2. [PMID: 32040161 PMCID: PMC7343402 DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.2.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Visual motion estimation is a canonical neural computation. In Drosophila, recent advances have identified anatomic and functional circuitry underlying direction-selective computations. Models with varying levels of abstraction have been proposed to explain specific experimental results but have rarely been compared across experiments. Here we use the wealth of available anatomical and physiological data to construct a minimal, biophysically inspired synaptic model for Drosophila’s first-order direction-selective T4 cells. We show how this model relates mathematically to classical models of motion detection, including the Hassenstein-Reichardt correlator model. We used numerical simulation to test how well this synaptic model could reproduce measurements of T4 cells across many datasets and stimulus modalities. These comparisons include responses to sinusoid gratings, to apparent motion stimuli, to stochastic stimuli, and to natural scenes. Without fine-tuning this model, it sufficed to reproduce many, but not all, response properties of T4 cells. Since this model is flexible and based on straightforward biophysical properties, it provides an extensible framework for developing a mechanistic understanding of T4 neural response properties. Moreover, it can be used to assess the sufficiency of simple biophysical mechanisms to describe features of the direction-selective computation and identify where our understanding must be improved.
Collapse
|