The regulatory landscape of the human HPF1- and ARH3-dependent ADP-ribosylome

Targeting DNA damage sensors for cancer therapy

DNA damage occurs from both endogenous and exogenous sources and DNA damaging agents are a mainstay in cancer therapeutics. DNA damage sensors (DDS) are proteins that recognize and bind to unique DNA structures that arise from direct DNA damage or replication stress and are the first step in the DNA damage response (DDR). DNA damage sensors are responsible for recruiting transducer proteins that signal downstream DNA repair pathways. As the initiating proteins, DDS are excellent candidates for anti-cancer drug targeting to limit DDR activation. Here, we review four major DDS: PARP1, RPA, Ku, and the MRN complex. We briefly describe the cellular DDS functions before analyzing the structural mechanisms of DNA damage sensing. Lastly, we examine the current state of the field towards inhibiting each DDS for anti-cancer therapeutics and broadly discuss the therapeutic potential for DDS targeting.

Adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation greatly affects proteins function: a focus on neurodegenerative diseases

Adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation (ADPRylation) is a reversible posttranslational modification that plays a crucial role in cellular homeostasis and disease development. ADPRylation is produced via nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrolysis and modifies proteins via corresponding transferases, mainly poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), the inhibitors of which have been used in the clinical treatment of cancer. ADPRylation is involved in various physiological processes, including pathogen infection, inflammation, DNA repair, and neurological disorders. In neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), dysregulated ADPRylation contributes to protein aggregation, neuroinflammation, and metabolic disturbances, while targeted modulation shows therapeutic potential. ADPRylation differentially regulates neurodegenerative processes, and PARP inhibitors can reduce neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysfunction. However, challenges such as poor blood-brain barrier penetration and cell type-specific responses limit clinical translation. This review summarizes recent findings on the role of ADPRylation and PARPs in NDs, highlighting their involvement in protein aggregation and cellular signaling. It emphasizes the importance of ADPRylation in neuronal cells and supports the development of precision therapies targeting this pathway to address current treatment challenges in NDs.

DNA stimulates the deacetylase SIRT6 to mono-ADP-ribosylate proteins with histidine repeats

Sirtuins are the NAD+-dependent class III lysine deacylases (KDACs). Members of this family have been linked to longevity and a wide array of different diseases, motivating the pursuit of sirtuin modulator compounds. Sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) is a primarily nuclear KDAC that deacetylates histones to facilitate gene repression. In addition to this canonical post-translational modification (PTM) "eraser" function, SIRT6 can use NAD+ instead to "write" mono-ADP-ribosylation (mARylation) on target proteins. This enzymatic function has been primarily associated with SIRT6's role in the DNA damage response. This modification has been challenging to study because it is not clear under what precise cellular contexts it occurs, only a few substrates are known, and potential interference from other ADP-ribosyltransferases in cells, among other reasons. In this work, we used commercially available ADP-ribosylation detection reagents to investigate the mARylation activity of SIRT6 in a reconstituted system. We observed that SIRT6 is activated in its mARylation activity by binding to dsDNA ends. We further identified a surprising target motif within biochemical substrates of SIRT6, polyhistidine (polyHis) repeat tracts, that are present in several previously identified SIRT6 mARylation substrates. This work provides important context for SIRT6 mARylation activity, in contrast to its KDAC activity, and generates a list of new potential SIRT6 mARylation substrates based on the polyHis motif..

Family-wide analysis of human macrodomains reveals novel activities and identifies PARG as most efficient ADPr-RNA hydrolase

ADP-ribosylation is well-known as protein posttranslational modification and was recently also identified as RNA posttranscriptional modification. When macrodomain proteins were identified as protein ADP-ribosylhydrolases, several ADP-ribosylation substrates were not yet identified. Therefore, the majority of macrodomain-containing proteins have not been tested towards these additional substrates and were considered to be inactive. Here, we compare in vitro activities of the human macrodomains on a range of ADP-ribosylated substrates. We confirm recent findings that PARP9macro1 and PARP14macro1 can remove ADP-ribose from acidic residues and provide evidence that also PARP14macro2 and PARP15macro2 can function as ADP-ribosylhydrolases. In addition, we find that both PARP9macro1 and PARP14macro1 are active as ADPr-RNA decapping protein domains. Notwithstanding these in vitro activities, our data furthermore indicate that in HEK293 cells, PARG is the major ADPr-RNA decapping enzyme. Our findings thus expand the spectrum of known catalytic activities of human macrodomains and demonstrate their different efficiencies towards nucleic acid substrates.

Reduction of Chemokine CXCL9 Expression by Omega-3 Fatty Acids via ADP-Ribosylhydrolase ARH3 in MIN6 Insulin-Producing Cells

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing β cells of the pancreas. Omega-3 fatty acids protect β cells and reduce the incidence of T1D, but the mechanism is poorly understood. We have shown that omega-3 fatty acids reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated β-cell apoptosis by upregulating the expression of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3. Here, we further investigate the β-cell protection mechanism of ARH3 by performing siRNA analysis of its gene Adprhl2 in MIN6 insulin-producing cells, subsequent treatment with a cocktail of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β + IFN-γ + TNF-α, followed by proteomics analysis. ARH3 regulated proteins from several pathways related to the nucleus (splicing, RNA surveillance, and nucleocytoplasmic transport), mitochondria (metabolic pathways), and endoplasmic reticulum (protein folding). ARH3 also regulated the levels of proteins related to antigen processing and presentation, and the chemokine-signaling pathway. We further studied the role of ARH3 in regulating the chemokine CXCL9. We found that ARH3 reduces the cytokine-induced expression of CXCL9, which is dependent on omega-3 fatty acids. In conclusion, we demonstrate that omega-3 fatty acids regulate CXCL9 expression via ARH3, which may have a role in protecting β cells from immune attack thereby preventing T1D development. Significance of the Study: Omega-3 fatty acids have a variety of health benefits. In type 1 diabetes, omega-3 fatty acids reduce the islet autoimmune response and the disease development. Here, we studied the pathways regulated by the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylhydrolase ARH3, a protein whose expression is regulated by omega-3 fatty acids. We showed that ARH3 reduces the expression of chemokines in response to omega-3 fatty acids. This represents an anti-inflammatory mechanism of omega-3 fatty acids that might be involved with protection against type 1 diabetes development.

CHD6 has poly(ADP-ribose)- and DNA-binding domains and regulates PARP1/2-trapping inhibitor sensitivity via abasic site repair

To tolerate oxidative stress, cells enable DNA repair responses often sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibition-an intervention effective against cancers lacking BRCA1/2. Here, we demonstrate that mutating the CHD6 chromatin remodeler sensitizes cells to PARP1/2 inhibitors in a manner distinct from BRCA1, and that CHD6 recruitment to DNA damage requires cooperation between PAR- and DNA-binding domains essential for nucleosome sliding activity. CHD6 displays direct PAR-binding, interacts with PARP-1 and other PAR-associated proteins, and combined DNA- and PAR-binding loss eliminates CHD6 relocalization to DNA damage. While CHD6 loss does not impair RAD51 foci formation or DNA double-strand break repair, it causes sensitivity to replication stress, and PARP1/2-trapping or Pol ζ inhibitor-induced γH2AX foci accumulation in S-phase. DNA repair pathway screening reveals that CHD6 loss elicits insufficiency in apurinic-apyrimidinic endonuclease (APEX1) activity and genomic abasic site accumulation. We reveal APEX1-linked roles for CHD6 important for understanding PARP1/2-trapping inhibitor sensitivity.

Suppression of ADP-ribosylation reversal triggers cell vulnerability to alkylating agents

The ADP-ribosyl hydrolases PARG and ARH3 counteract PARP enzymatic activity by removing ADP-ribosylation. PARG and ARH3 activities have a synthetic lethal effect; however, the specific molecular mechanisms underlying this response remain unknown. Here, we show that the PARG and ARH3 synthetic lethality is enhanced further in the presence of DNA alkylating agents, suggesting that the inability to revert ADP-ribosylation primarily affects the repair of alkylated DNA bases. ARH3 knockout cells, treated with PARG inhibitor and alkylating genotoxins, accumulated single-stranded DNA and DNA damage, resulting in G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Furthermore, we reveal a reduction in PARP1/PARP2 levels in ARH3-deficient cells treated with PARG inhibitor due to excessive ADP-ribosylation, which may contribute to alkylating agents' vulnerability. Collectively, these results uncover the potential of targeting ADP-ribosyl hydrolases in combination with alkylating agents for cancer therapy and provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the synthetic lethal effect.

The complex universe of inactive PARP1

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is a crucial member of the PARP family, which modifies targets through ADP-ribosylation and plays key roles in a variety of biological processes. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) hinder ADP-ribosylation and lead to the retention of PARP1 at the DNA lesion (also known as trapping), which underlies their toxicity. However, inhibitors and mutations that make PARP1 inactive do not necessarily correlate with trapping potency, challenging the current understanding of inactivation-caused trapping. Recent studies on mouse models indicate that both trapping and non-trapping inactivating mutations of PARP1 lead to embryonic lethality, suggesting the unexpected toxicity of the current inhibition strategy. The allosteric model, complicated automodification, and various biological functions of PARP1 all contribute to the complexity of PARP1 inactivation.

SART1 modulates poly-(ADP-ribose) chain accumulation and PARP1 chromatin localization

PARP1 inhibitors (PARPis) are used for treatment of cancers with mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 that are deficient in homologous recombination. The identification of modulators of PARP1 activity is critical to understand and overcome resistance to PARPis. We integrated data from three omics-scale screens to discover new regulators of PARP1 activity. We identified SART1 and show that its silencing leads to an increase in poly-ADP ribosylation and chromatin-bound PARP1. SART1 is recruited to chromatin following DNA damage and limits PARP1 chromatin retention and activity. The SART1 N-terminus is sufficient to regulate the accumulation of PAR chains and PARP1 on chromatin, an activity dependent on the RGG/RG box. Silencing of SART1 leads to an increased sensitivity of cells to DNA damage induced by IR, irrespective of BRCA1 status and to PARPis only in absence of BRCA1. These results suggest that SART1 could be clinically utilized to improve PARPi efficacy.

The quest to identify ADP-ribosylation readers: methodological advances

ADP-ribosylation regulates numerous fundamental cellular processes in health and disease. However, the limited availability of suitable tools and methods prevents the identification and characterization of certain components of the ADP-ribosylation signaling network and, consequently, efficient utilization of their biomedical potential. Identification of ADP-ribose (ADPr) readers has been particularly impeded by challenges associated with the development of ADPr-based enrichment probes. These difficulties were finally overcome in several recent studies describing various approaches to identifying ADPr readers in an unbiased, proteome-wide manner. In this review we discuss these different strategies and their limitations, benefits and drawbacks, and summarize how these technologies contribute to a dissection of ADP-ribosylation signaling networks. We also address unmet technological needs and future directions to investigate interactions with ADPr linkages.

Reversal of tyrosine-linked ADP-ribosylation by ARH3 and PARG

ADP-ribosylation is an ancient posttranslational modification with exceptional versatility in terms of breadth of modification targets including at least seven different amino acid side chains, various moieties on nucleic acids, and a variety of small chemical compounds. The spatiotemporal signaling dynamic of the different modification variations is tightly regulated and depends on the writers, erases, and readers of each type. Among these, tyrosine ADP-ribosylation (Tyr-ADPr) has been consistently detected as a novel modification type, but systematic analysis of its potential physiological role, modification establishment, and reversal are still lacking. Here we present a re-analysis of recent ADP-ribosylome data and show that Tyr-ADPr sites are conserved and enriched among ribosome biogenesis and mRNA processing proteins and that these sites are affected by the status of the (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolase ARH3. To facilitate the study of Tyr-ADPr, we establish methodologies for the synthesis of well-defined Tyr-ADPr peptides and with these could show that Tyr-ADPr is reversed both by ARH3 and PARG enzymes. Together, our work lays the foundation for the future exploration of the Tyr-ADPr.

A Genetically Encoded Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Poly-ADP-Ribosylation Dynamics In Vitro and in Cells

ADP-ribosylation, the transfer of ADP-ribose (ADPr) from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) groups to proteins, is a conserved post-translational modification (PTM) that occurs most prominently in response to DNA damage. ADP-ribosylation is a dynamic PTM regulated by writers (PARPs), erasers (ADPr hydrolases), and readers (ADPR binders). PARP1 is the primary DNA damage-response writer responsible for adding a polymer of ADPR to proteins (PARylation). Real-time monitoring of PARP1-mediated PARylation, especially in live cells, is critical for understanding the spatial and temporal regulation of this unique PTM. Here, we describe a genetically encoded FRET probe (pARS) for semiquantitative monitoring of PARylation dynamics. pARS feature a PAR-binding WWE domain flanked with turquoise and Venus. With a ratiometric readout and excellent signal-to-noise characteristics, we show that pARS can monitor PARP1-dependent PARylation temporally and spatially in real-time. pARS provided unique insights into PARP1-mediated PARylation kinetics in vitro and high-sensitivity detection of PARylation in live cells, even under mild DNA damage. We also show that pARS can be used to determine the potency of PARP inhibitors in vitro and, for the first time, in live cells in response to DNA damage. The robustness and ease of use of pARS make it an important tool for the PARP field.

Dispensability of HPF1 for cellular removal of DNA single-strand breaks

In response to DNA damage, the histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1) regulates PARP1/2 activity, facilitating serine ADP-ribosylation of chromatin-associated factors. While PARP1/2 are known for their role in DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR), the significance of HPF1 in this process remains unclear. Here, we investigated the impact of HPF1 deficiency on cellular survival and SSBR following exposure to various genotoxins. We found that HPF1 loss did not generally increase cellular sensitivity to agents that typically induce DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) repaired by PARP1. SSBR kinetics in HPF1-deficient cells were largely unaffected, though its absence partially influenced the accumulation of SSB intermediates after exposure to specific genotoxins in certain cell lines, likely due to altered ADP-ribosylation of chromatin. Despite reduced serine mono-ADP-ribosylation, HPF1-deficient cells maintained robust poly-ADP-ribosylation at SSB sites, possibly reflecting PARP1 auto-poly-ADP-ribosylation at non-serine residues. Notably, poly-ADP-ribose chains were sufficient to recruit the DNA repair factor XRCC1, which may explain the relatively normal SSBR capacity in HPF1-deficient cells. These findings suggest that HPF1 and histone serine ADP-ribosylation are largely dispensable for PARP1-dependent SSBR in response to genotoxic stress, highlighting the complexity of mechanisms that maintain genomic stability and chromatin remodeling.

Intrinsic PARG inhibitor sensitivity is mimicked by TIMELESS haploinsufficiency and rescued by nucleoside supplementation

A subset of cancer cells are intrinsically sensitive to inhibitors targeting PARG, the poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase that degrades PAR chains. Sensitivity is accompanied by persistent DNA replication stress, and can be induced by inhibition of TIMELESS, a replisome accelerator. However, the nature of the vulnerability responsible for intrinsic sensitivity remains undetermined. To understand PARG activity dependency, we analysed Timeless model systems and intrinsically sensitive ovarian cancer cells. We show that nucleoside supplementation rescues all phenotypes associated with PARG inhibitor sensitivity, including replisome speed and fork stalling, S-phase completion and mitotic entry, proliferation dynamics and clonogenic potential. Importantly nucleoside supplementation restores PARG inhibitor resistance despite the continued presence of PAR chains, indicating that sensitivity does not correlate with PAR levels. In addition, we show that inhibition of thymidylate synthase, an enzyme required for dNTP homeostasis, induces PARG-dependency. Together, these observations suggest that PARG inhibitor sensitivity reflects an inability to control replisome speed and/or maintain helicase-polymerase coupling in response to nucleotide imbalances.

Molecular mechanisms of cell death by parthanatos: More questions than answers

Regulated cell death by a non-apoptotic pathway known as parthanatos is increasingly recognised as a central player in pathological processes, including ischaemic tissue damage and neurodegenerative diseases. Parthanatos is activated under conditions that induce high levels of DNA damage, leading to hyperactivation of the DNA damage sensor PARP1. While this strict dependence on PARP1 activation is a defining feature of parthanatos that distinguishes it from other forms of cell death, the molecular events downstream of PARP1 activation remain poorly understood. In this mini-review, we highlight a number of important questions that remain to be answered about this enigmatic form of cell death.

Unveiling FRG1's DNA repair role in breast cancer

The FRG1(FSHD region gene 1) gene has emerged as a pivotal tumor suppressor in both breast and prostate cancer. HPF1 (Histone PARylation Factor 1), a gene crucial in the base excision repair (BER) mechanism for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) lesions, showcases a robust correlation with FRG1. This implies that FRG1 might have the capacity to influence BER via HPF1, potentially playing a role in tumorigenesis. Using a comprehensive approach that integrates in-silico analyses involving differential gene expression, KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), GO (Gene Ontology), and STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) databases, we unravelled the intricate network of genes and pathways influenced by FRG1, which includes BER. Our linear regression analysis unveiled a positive relationship between FRG1 and key genes crucial for BER. Notably, breast cancer patients with low FRG1 expression exhibited a significantly higher frequency of mutation in TP53. To enhance the accuracy of our analysis, we conducted qRT-PCR assays, which demonstrated that FRG1 affects the transcription of DNA base excision repair genes, showing differential expression in breast cancer cells. Moreover, through the Alkaline Comet Assay, a technique that quantifies DNA damage at the single-cell level, we observed diminished DNA repair capabilities when FRG1 levels are low. Risk scores were calculated using the Cox regression coefficients, and we found notable differences in Overall Survival (OS) and mRNA expression of DEGs in the low and high-risk groups. In summary, our findings shed light on the pivotal role of FRG1 in maintaining DNA repair efficiency within breast cancer cells.

PARP1-dependent DNA-protein crosslink repair

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are toxic lesions that inhibit DNA related processes. Post-translational modifications (PTMs), including SUMOylation and ubiquitylation, play a central role in DPC resolution, but whether other PTMs are also involved remains elusive. Here, we identify a DPC repair pathway orchestrated by poly-ADP-ribosylation (PARylation). Using Xenopus egg extracts, we show that DPCs on single-stranded DNA gaps can be targeted for degradation via a replication-independent mechanism. During this process, DPCs are initially PARylated by PARP1 and subsequently ubiquitylated and degraded by the proteasome. Notably, PARP1-mediated DPC resolution is required for resolving topoisomerase 1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1ccs) induced by camptothecin. Using the Flp-nick system, we further reveal that in the absence of PARP1 activity, the TOP1cc-like lesion persists and induces replisome disassembly when encountered by a DNA replication fork. In summary, our work uncovers a PARP1-mediated DPC repair pathway that may underlie the synergistic toxicity between TOP1 poisons and PARP inhibitors.

An E3 ubiquitin ligase localization screen uncovers DTX2 as a novel ADP-ribosylation-dependent regulator of DNA double-strand break repair

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) elicit an elaborate response to signal damage and trigger repair via two major pathways: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), which functions throughout the interphase, and homologous recombination (HR), restricted to S/G2 phases. The DNA damage response relies, on post-translational modifications of nuclear factors to coordinate the mending of breaks. Ubiquitylation of histones and chromatin-associated factors regulates DSB repair and numerous E3 ubiquitin ligases are involved in this process. Despite significant progress, our understanding of ubiquitin-mediated DNA damage response regulation remains incomplete. Here, we have performed a localization screen to identify RING/U-box E3 ligases involved in genome maintenance. Our approach uncovered 7 novel E3 ligases that are recruited to microirradiation stripes, suggesting potential roles in DNA damage signaling and repair. Among these factors, the DELTEX family E3 ligase DTX2 is rapidly mobilized to lesions in a poly ADP-ribosylation-dependent manner. DTX2 is recruited and retained at DSBs via its WWE and DELTEX conserved C-terminal domains. In cells, both domains are required for optimal binding to mono and poly ADP-ribosylated proteins with WWEs playing a prominent role in this process. Supporting its involvement in DSB repair, DTX2 depletion decreases HR efficiency and moderately enhances NHEJ. Furthermore, DTX2 depletion impeded BRCA1 foci formation and increased 53BP1 accumulation at DSBs, suggesting a fine-tuning role for this E3 ligase in repair pathway choice. Finally, DTX2 depletion sensitized cancer cells to X-rays and PARP inhibition and these susceptibilities could be rescued by DTX2 reexpression. Altogether, our work identifies DTX2 as a novel ADP-ribosylation-dependent regulator of HR-mediated DSB repair.

PARticular MARks: Histone ADP-ribosylation and the DNA damage response

Cellular and molecular responses to DNA damage are highly orchestrated and dynamic, acting to preserve the maintenance and integrity of the genome. Histone proteins bind DNA and organize the genome into chromatin. Post-translational modifications of histones have been shown to play an essential role in orchestrating the chromatin response to DNA damage by regulating the DNA damage response pathway. Among the histone modifications that contribute to this intricate network, histone ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) is emerging as a pivotal component of chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. In this review, we survey how histone ADPr is regulated to promote the DDR and how it impacts chromatin and other histone marks. Recent advancements have revealed histone ADPr effects on chromatin structure and the regulation of DNA repair factor recruitment to DNA lesions. Additionally, we highlight advancements in technology that have enabled the identification and functional validation of histone ADPr in cells and in response to DNA damage. Given the involvement of DNA damage and epigenetic regulation in human diseases including cancer, these findings have clinical implications for histone ADPr, which are also discussed. Overall, this review covers the involvement of histone ADPr in the DDR and highlights potential future investigations aimed at identifying mechanisms governed by histone ADPr that participate in the DDR, human diseases, and their treatments.

DNA stimulates SIRT6 to mono-ADP-ribosylate proteins within histidine repeats

Sirtuins are the NAD + -dependent class III lysine deacylases (KDACs). Members of this family have been linked to longevity and a wide array of different diseases, motivating the pursuit of sirtuin modulator compounds. Sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) is a primarily nuclear KDAC that deacetylates histones to facilitate gene repression. In addition to this canonical post-translational modification (PTM) "eraser" function, SIRT6 can use NAD + instead to "write" mono-ADP-ribosylation (mARylation) on target proteins. This enzymatic function has been primarily associated with SIRT6's role in the DNA damage response. This modification has been challenging to study because it is not clear under what precise cellular contexts it occurs, only a few substrates are known, and potential interference from other ADP-ribosyltransferases in cells, among other reasons. In this work, we used commercially available ADP-ribosylation detection reagents to investigate the mARylation activity of SIRT6 in a reconstituted system. We observed that SIRT6 is activated in its mARylation activity by binding to dsDNA ends. We further identified a surprising target motif within biochemical substrates of SIRT6, polyhistidine (polyHis) repeat tracts, that are present in several previously identified SIRT6 mARylation substrates and binding partners. This work provides important context for SIRT6 mARylation activity, in contrast to its KDAC activity, and proposes that SIRT6 is a histidine mARyltransferase enzyme.

ADP-ribosylome analysis reveals homogeneous DNA-damage-induced serine ADP-ribosylation across wild-type and BRCA-mutant breast cancer cell lines

ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) signaling plays a crucial role in DNA damage response. Inhibitors against the main enzyme catalyzing ADPr after DNA damage, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), are used to treat patients with breast cancer harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) is a major obstacle in treating patients. To understand the role of ADPr in PARPi sensitivity, we use liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to analyze ADPr in six breast cancer cell lines exhibiting different PARPi sensitivities. We identify 1,632 sites on 777 proteins across all cell lines, primarily on serine residues, with site-specific overlap of targeted residues across DNA-damage-related proteins across all cell lines, demonstrating high conservation of serine ADPr-signaling networks upon DNA damage. Furthermore, we observe site-specific differences in ADPr intensities in PARPi-sensitive BRCA mutants and unique ADPr sites in PARPi-resistant BRCA-mutant HCC1937 cells, which have low poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) levels and longer ADPr chains on PARP1.

PARG is essential for Polθ-mediated DNA end-joining by removing repressive poly-ADP-ribose marks

DNA polymerase theta (Polθ)-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) repairs DNA double-strand breaks and confers resistance to genotoxic agents. How Polθ is regulated at the molecular level to exert TMEJ remains poorly characterized. We find that Polθ interacts with and is PARylated by PARP1 in a HPF1-independent manner. PARP1 recruits Polθ to the vicinity of DNA damage via PARylation dependent liquid demixing, however, PARylated Polθ cannot perform TMEJ due to its inability to bind DNA. PARG-mediated de-PARylation of Polθ reactivates its DNA binding and end-joining activities. Consistent with this, PARG is essential for TMEJ and the temporal recruitment of PARG to DNA damage corresponds with TMEJ activation and dissipation of PARP1 and PAR. In conclusion, we show a two-step spatiotemporal mechanism of TMEJ regulation. First, PARP1 PARylates Polθ and facilitates its recruitment to DNA damage sites in an inactivated state. PARG subsequently activates TMEJ by removing repressive PAR marks on Polθ.

Chemical tools for profiling the intracellular ADP-ribosylated proteome

The post-translational modification (PTM) ADP-ribosylation plays an important role in cell signalling and regulating protein function and has been implicated in the development of multiple diseases, including breast and ovarian cancers. Studying the underlying mechanisms through which this PTM contributes towards disease development, however, has been hampered by the lack of appropriate tools for reliable identification of physiologically relevant ADP-ribosylated proteins in a live-cell environment. Herein, we explore the application of an alkyne-tagged proprobe, 6Yn-ProTide-Ad (6Yn-Pro) as a chemical tool for the identification of intracellular ADP-ribosylated proteins through metabolic labelling. We applied targeted metabolomics and chemical proteomics in HEK293T cells treated with 6Yn-Pro to demonstrate intracellular metabolic conversion of the probe into ADP-ribosylation cofactor 6Yn-NAD+, and subsequent labelling and enrichment of PARP1 and multiple known ADP-ribosylated proteins in cells under hydrogen peroxide-induced stress. We anticipate that the approach and methodology described here will be useful for future identification of novel intracellular ADP-ribosylated proteins.

The TIMELESS and PARP1 interaction suppresses replication-associated DNA gap accumulation

TIMELESS (TIM) in the fork protection complex acts as a scaffold of the replisome to prevent its uncoupling and ensure efficient DNA replication fork progression. Nevertheless, its underlying basis for coordinating leading and lagging strand synthesis to limit single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) exposure remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that acute degradation of TIM at ongoing DNA replication forks induces the accumulation of ssDNA gaps stemming from defective Okazaki fragment (OF) processing. Cells devoid of TIM fail to support the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation necessary for backing up the canonical OF processing mechanism mediated by LIG1 and FEN1. Consequently, recruitment of XRCC1, a known effector of PARP1-dependent single-strand break repair, to post-replicative ssDNA gaps behind replication forks is impaired. Physical disruption of the TIM-PARP1 complex phenocopies the rapid loss of TIM, indicating that the TIM-PARP1 interaction is critical for the activation of this compensatory pathway. Accordingly, combined deficiency of FEN1 and the TIM-PARP1 interaction leads to synergistic DNA damage and cytotoxicity. We propose that TIM is essential for the engagement of PARP1 to the replisome to coordinate lagging strand synthesis with replication fork progression. Our study identifies TIM as a synthetic lethal target of OF processing enzymes that can be exploited for cancer therapy.

Histone ADP-ribosylation promotes resistance to PARP inhibitors by facilitating PARP1 release from DNA lesions

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) has emerged as a central target for cancer therapies due to the ability of PARP inhibitors to specifically kill tumors deficient for DNA repair by homologous recombination. Upon DNA damage, PARP1 quickly binds to DNA breaks and triggers ADP-ribosylation signaling. ADP-ribosylation is important for the recruitment of various factors to sites of damage, as well as for the timely dissociation of PARP1 from DNA breaks. Indeed, PARP1 becomes trapped at DNA breaks in the presence of PARP inhibitors, a mechanism underlying the cytotoxitiy of these inhibitors. Therefore, any cellular process influencing trapping is thought to impact PARP inhibitor efficiency, potentially leading to acquired resistance in patients treated with these drugs. There are numerous ADP-ribosylation targets after DNA damage, including PARP1 itself as well as histones. While recent findings reported that the automodification of PARP1 promotes its release from the DNA lesions, the potential impact of other ADP-ribosylated proteins on this process remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that histone ADP-ribosylation is also crucial for the timely dissipation of PARP1 from the lesions, thus contributing to cellular resistance to PARP inhibitors. Considering the crosstalk between ADP-ribosylation and other histone marks, our findings open interesting perspectives for the development of more efficient PARP inhibitor-driven cancer therapies.

A genetically encoded sensor for real-time monitoring of poly-ADP-ribosylation dynamics in-vitro and in cells

ADP-ribosylation, the transfer of ADP-ribose (ADPr) from nico-tinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) groups to proteins, is a conserved post-translational modification (PTM) that occurs most prominently in response to DNA damage. ADP-ribosylation is a dynamic PTM regulated by writers (PARPs), erasers (ADPr hy-drolases), and readers (ADPR binders). PARP1 is the primary DNA damage-response writer responsible for adding a polymer of ADPR to proteins (PARylation). Real-time monitoring of PARP1-mediated PARylation, especially in live cells, is critical for under-standing the spatial and temporal regulation of this unique PTM. Here, we describe a genetically encoded FRET probe (pARS) for semi-quantitative monitoring of PARylation dynamics. pARS feature a PAR-binding WWE domain flanked with turquoise and Venus. With a ratiometric readout and excellent signal-to-noise characteristics, we show that pARS can monitor PARP1-dependent PARylation temporally and spatially in real-time. pARS provided unique insights into PARP1-mediated PARylation kinetics in vitro and high-sensitivity detection of PARylation in live cells, even under mild DNA damage. We also show that pARS can be used to determine the potency of PARP inhibitors in vitro and, for the first time, in live cells in response to DNA damage. The robustness and ease of use of pARS make it an important tool for the PARP field.

APLF facilitates interstrand DNA crosslink repair and replication fork protection to confer cisplatin resistance

Replication stress converts the stalled forks into reversed forks, which is an important protection mechanism to prevent fork degradation and collapse into poisonous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Paradoxically, the mechanism also acts in cancer cells to contribute to chemoresistance against various DNA-damaging agents. PARP1 binds to and is activated by stalled forks to facilitate fork reversal. Aprataxin and polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase-like factor (APLF) binds to PARP1 through the poly(ADP-ribose) zinc finger (PBZ) domain and is known to be involved in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Here, we identify a novel function of APLF involved in interstrand DNA crosslink (ICL) repair and fork protection. We demonstrate that PARP1 activity facilitates the APLF recruitment to stalled forks, enabling the FANCD2 recruitment to stalled forks. The depletion of APLF sensitizes cells to cisplatin, impairs ICL repair, reduces the FANCD2 recruitment to stalled forks, and results in nascent DNA degradation by MRE11 nucleases. Additionally, cisplatin-resistant cancer cells show high levels of APLF and homologous recombination-related gene expression. The depletion of APLF sensitizes cells to cisplatin and results in fork instability. Our results reveal the novel function of APLF to facilitate ICL repair and fork protection, thereby contributing to cisplatin-resistant phenotypes of cancer cells.

Retron-Eco1 assembles NAD+-hydrolyzing filaments that provide immunity against bacteriophages

Retrons are toxin-antitoxin systems protecting bacteria against bacteriophages via abortive infection. The Retron-Eco1 antitoxin is formed by a reverse transcriptase (RT) and a non-coding RNA (ncRNA)/multi-copy single-stranded DNA (msDNA) hybrid that neutralizes an uncharacterized toxic effector. Yet, the molecular mechanisms underlying phage defense remain unknown. Here, we show that the N-glycosidase effector, which belongs to the STIR superfamily, hydrolyzes NAD+ during infection. Cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis shows that the msDNA stabilizes a filament that cages the effector in a low-activity state in which ADPr, a NAD+ hydrolysis product, is covalently linked to the catalytic E106 residue. Mutations shortening the msDNA induce filament disassembly and the effector's toxicity, underscoring the msDNA role in immunity. Furthermore, we discovered a phage-encoded Retron-Eco1 inhibitor (U56) that binds ADPr, highlighting the intricate interplay between retron systems and phage evolution. Our work outlines the structural basis of Retron-Eco1 defense, uncovering ADPr's pivotal role in immunity.

Preserving ester-linked modifications reveals glutamate and aspartate mono-ADP-ribosylation by PARP1 and its reversal by PARG

Ester-linked post-translational modifications, including serine and threonine ubiquitination, have gained recognition as important cellular signals. However, their detection remains a significant challenge due to the chemical lability of the ester bond. This is the case even for long-known modifications, such as ADP-ribosylation on aspartate and glutamate, whose role in PARP1 signaling has recently been questioned. Here, we present easily implementable methods for preserving ester-linked modifications. When combined with a specific and sensitive modular antibody and mass spectrometry, these approaches reveal DNA damage-induced aspartate/glutamate mono-ADP-ribosylation. This previously elusive signal represents an initial wave of PARP1 signaling, contrasting with the more enduring nature of serine mono-ADP-ribosylation. Unexpectedly, we show that the poly-ADP-ribose hydrolase PARG is capable of reversing ester-linked mono-ADP-ribosylation in cells. Our methodology enables broad investigations of various ADP-ribosylation writers and, as illustrated here for noncanonical ubiquitination, it paves the way for exploring other emerging ester-linked modifications.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of TIMELESS limits DNA replication stress and promotes stalled fork protection

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), catalyzed mainly by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1, is a key posttranslational modification involved in DNA replication and repair. Here, we report that TIMELESS (TIM), an essential scaffold of the replisome, is PARylated, which is linked to its proteolysis. TIM PARylation requires recognition of auto-modified PARP1 via two poly(ADP-ribose)-binding motifs, which primes TIM for proteasome-dependent degradation. Cells expressing the PARylation-refractory TIM mutant or under PARP inhibition accumulate TIM at DNA replication forks, causing replication stress and hyper-resection of stalled forks. Mechanistically, aberrant engagement of TIM with the replicative helicase impedes RAD51 loading and protection of reversed forks. Accordingly, defective TIM degradation hypersensitizes BRCA2-deficient cells to replication damage. Our study defines TIM as a substrate of PARP1 and elucidates how the control of replisome remodeling by PARylation is linked to stalled fork protection. Therefore, we propose a mechanism of PARP inhibition that impinges on the DNA replication fork instability caused by defective TIM turnover.

The logic of protein post-translational modifications (PTMs): Chemistry, mechanisms and evolution of protein regulation through covalent attachments

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) play a crucial role in all cellular functions by regulating protein activity, interactions and half-life. Despite the enormous diversity of modifications, various PTM systems show parallels in their chemical and catalytic underpinnings. Here, focussing on modifications that involve the addition of new elements to amino-acid sidechains, I describe historical milestones and fundamental concepts that support the current understanding of PTMs. The historical survey covers selected key research programmes, including the study of protein phosphorylation as a regulatory switch, protein ubiquitylation as a degradation signal and histone modifications as a functional code. The contribution of crucial techniques for studying PTMs is also discussed. The central part of the essay explores shared chemical principles and catalytic strategies observed across diverse PTM systems, together with mechanisms of substrate selection, the reversibility of PTMs by erasers and the recognition of PTMs by reader domains. Similarities in the basic chemical mechanism are highlighted and their implications are discussed. The final part is dedicated to the evolutionary trajectories of PTM systems, beginning with their possible emergence in the context of rivalry in the prokaryotic world. Together, the essay provides a unified perspective on the diverse world of major protein modifications.

Uncommon posttranslational modifications in proteomics: ADP-ribosylation, tyrosine nitration, and tyrosine sulfation

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) are covalent modifications of proteins that modulate the structure and functions of proteins and regulate biological processes. The development of various mass spectrometry-based proteomics workflows has facilitated the identification of hundreds of PTMs and aided the understanding of biological significance in a high throughput manner. Improvements in sample preparation and PTM enrichment techniques, instrumentation for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and advanced data analysis tools enhance the specificity and sensitivity of PTM identification. Highly prevalent PTMs like phosphorylation, glycosylation, acetylation, ubiquitinylation, and methylation are extensively studied. However, the functions and impact of less abundant PTMs are not as well understood and underscore the need for analytical methods that aim to characterize these PTMs. This review focuses on the advancement and analytical challenges associated with the characterization of three less common but biologically relevant PTMs, specifically, adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation, tyrosine sulfation, and tyrosine nitration. The advantages and disadvantages of various enrichment, separation, and MS/MS techniques utilized to identify and localize these PTMs are described.

ADP-ribosylation: An emerging direction for disease treatment

ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) is a dynamically reversible post-translational modification (PTM) driven primarily by ADP-ribosyltransferases (ADPRTs or ARTs), which have ADP-ribosyl transfer activity. ADPr modification is involved in signaling pathways, DNA damage repair, metabolism, immunity, and inflammation. In recent years, several studies have revealed that new targets or treatments for tumors, cardiovascular diseases, neuromuscular diseases and infectious diseases can be explored by regulating ADPr. Here, we review the recent research progress on ART-mediated ADP-ribosylation and the latest findings in the diagnosis and treatment of related diseases.

PARP1 at the crossroad of cellular senescence and nucleolar processes

Senescent cells that occur in response to telomere shortening, oncogenes, extracellular and intracellular stress factors are characterized by permanent cell cycle arrest, the morphological and structural changes of the cell that include the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) and nucleoli rearrangement. The associated DNA lesions induce DNA damage response (DDR), which activates the DNA repair protein - poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1). This protein consumes NAD+ to synthesize ADP-ribose polymer (PAR) on its own protein chain and on other interacting proteins. The involvement of PARP1 in nucleoli processes, such as rRNA transcription and ribosome biogenesis, the maintenance of heterochromatin and nucleoli structure, as well as controlling the crucial DDR protein release from the nucleoli to nucleus, links PARP1 with cellular senescence and nucleoli functioning. In this review we describe and discuss the impact of PARP1-mediated ADP-ribosylation on early cell commitment to senescence with the possible role of senescence-induced PARP1 transcriptional repression and protein degradation on nucleoli structure and function. The cause-effect interplay between PARP1 activation/decline and nucleoli functioning during senescence needs to be studied in detail.

Reduction of chemokine CXCL9 expression by omega-3 fatty acids via ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3 in MIN6 insulin-producing cells

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the autoimmune destruction of the insulin producing β cells of the pancreas. Omega-3 fatty acids protect β cells and reduce the incident of T1D. However, how omega-3 fatty acids act on β cells is not well understood. We have shown that omega-3 fatty acids reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated β-cell apoptosis by upregulating the expression of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3. Here, we further investigate the β-cell protection mechanism by ARH3 by performing siRNA of its gene Adprhl2 in MIN6 insulin-producing cells followed by treatment with a cocktail of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β + IFN-γ + TNF-α, and proteomics analysis. ARH3 regulated proteins from several pathways related to the nucleus (splicing, RNA surveillance and nucleocytoplasmic transport), mitochondria (metabolic pathways) and endoplasmic reticulum (protein folding). ARH3 also regulated the levels of cytokine-signaling proteins related to the antigen processing and presentation, and chemokine-signaling pathway. We further studied the role of ARH in regulating the chemokine CXCL9. We confirmed that ARH3 reduces the cytokine-induced expression of CXCL9 by ELISA. We also found that CXCL9 expression is regulated by omega-3 fatty acids. In conclusion, we showed that omega-3 fatty acids regulate CXCL9 expression via ARH3, which might have a role in protecting β cells from immune attack and preventing T1D development.

ADP-ribose contributions to genome stability and PARP enzyme trapping on sites of DNA damage; paradigm shifts for a coming-of-age modification

ADP-ribose is a versatile modification that plays a critical role in diverse cellular processes. The addition of this modification is catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases, among which notable poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are intimately involved in the maintenance of genome integrity. The role of ADP-ribose modifications during DNA damage repair is of significant interest for the proper development of PARP inhibitors targeted toward the treatment of diseases caused by genomic instability. More specifically, inhibitors promoting PARP persistence on DNA lesions, termed PARP "trapping," is considered a desirable characteristic. In this review, we discuss key classes of proteins involved in ADP-ribose signaling (writers, readers, and erasers) with a focus on those involved in the maintenance of genome integrity. An overview of factors that modulate PARP1 and PARP2 persistence at sites of DNA lesions is also discussed. Finally, we clarify aspects of the PARP trapping model in light of recent studies that characterize the kinetics of PARP1 and PARP2 recruitment at sites of lesions. These findings suggest that PARP trapping could be considered as the continuous recruitment of PARP molecules to sites of lesions, rather than the physical stalling of molecules. Recent studies and novel research tools have elevated the level of understanding of ADP-ribosylation, marking a coming-of-age for this interesting modification.

ZNF432 stimulates PARylation and inhibits DNA resection to balance PARPi sensitivity and resistance

Zinc finger (ZNF) motifs are some of the most frequently occurring domains in the human genome. It was only recently that ZNF proteins emerged as key regulators of genome integrity in mammalian cells. In this study, we report a new role for the Krüppel-type ZNF-containing protein ZNF432 as a novel poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) reader that regulates the DNA damage response. We show that ZNF432 is recruited to DNA lesions via DNA- and PAR-dependent mechanisms. Remarkably, ZNF432 stimulates PARP-1 activity in vitro and in cellulo. Knockdown of ZNF432 inhibits phospho-DNA-PKcs and increases RAD51 foci formation following irradiation. Moreover, purified ZNF432 preferentially binds single-stranded DNA and impairs EXO1-mediated DNA resection. Consequently, the loss of ZNF432 in a cellular system leads to resistance to PARP inhibitors while its overexpression results in sensitivity. Taken together, our results support the emerging concept that ZNF-containing proteins can modulate PARylation, which can be embodied by the pivotal role of ZNF432 to finely balance the outcome of PARPi response by regulating homologous recombination.

The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

The timely removal of ADP-ribosylation is crucial for efficient DNA repair. However, much remains to be discovered about ADP-ribosylhydrolases. Here, we characterize the physiological role of TARG1, an ADP-ribosylhydrolase that removes aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation. We reveal its function in the DNA damage response and show that the loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to inhibitors of topoisomerase II, ATR, and PARP. Furthermore, we find a PARP1-mediated synthetic lethal interaction between TARG1 and PARG, driven by the toxic accumulation of ADP-ribosylation, that induces replication stress and genomic instability. Finally, we show that histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1) deficiency exacerbates the toxicity and genomic instability induced by excessive ADP-ribosylation, suggesting a close crosstalk between components of the serine- and aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation pathways. Altogether, our data identify TARG1 as a potential biomarker for the response of cancer cells to PARP and PARG inhibition and establish that the interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects cells against genomic instability.

The dynamic process of covalent and non-covalent PARylation in the maintenance of genome integrity: a focus on PARP inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribosylation) (PARylation) by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) is a highly regulated process that consists of the covalent addition of polymers of ADP-ribose (PAR) through post-translational modifications of substrate proteins or non-covalent interactions with PAR via PAR binding domains and motifs, thereby reprogramming their functions. This modification is particularly known for its central role in the maintenance of genomic stability. However, how genomic integrity is controlled by an intricate interplay of covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding remains largely unknown. Of importance, PARylation has caught recent attention for providing a mechanistic basis of synthetic lethality involving PARP inhibitors (PARPi), most notably in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient breast and ovarian tumors. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the anti-cancer effect of PARPi are thought to implicate both catalytic inhibition and trapping of PARP enzymes on DNA. However, the relative contribution of each on tumor-specific cytotoxicity is still unclear. It is paramount to understand these PAR-dependent mechanisms, given that resistance to PARPi is a challenge in the clinic. Deciphering the complex interplay between covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding and defining how PARP trapping and non-trapping events contribute to PARPi anti-tumour activity is essential for developing improved therapeutic strategies. With this perspective, we review the current understanding of PARylation biology in the context of the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mechanisms underlying PARPi activity and resistance.

Regulation of Rad52-dependent replication fork recovery through serine ADP-ribosylation of PolD3

Although Poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerases (PARPs) are key regulators of genome stability, how site-specific ADP-ribosylation regulates DNA repair is unclear. Here, we describe a novel role for PARP1 and PARP2 in regulating Rad52-dependent replication fork repair to maintain cell viability when homologous recombination is dysfunctional, suppress replication-associated DNA damage, and maintain genome stability. Mechanistically, Mre11 and ATM are required for induction of PARP activity in response to replication stress that in turn promotes break-induced replication (BIR) through assembly of Rad52 at stalled/damaged replication forks. Further, by mapping ADP-ribosylation sites induced upon replication stress, we identify that PolD3 is a target for PARP1/PARP2 and that its site-specific ADP-ribosylation is required for BIR activity, replication fork recovery and genome stability. Overall, these data identify a critical role for Mre11-dependent PARP activation and site-specific ADP-ribosylation in regulating BIR to maintain genome integrity during DNA synthesis.

The function and regulation of ADP-ribosylation in the DNA damage response

ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification involved in DNA damage response (DDR). In higher organisms it is synthesised by PARP 1-3, DNA strand break sensors. Recent advances have identified serine residues as the most common targets for ADP-ribosylation during DDR. To ADP-ribosylate serine, PARPs require an accessory factor, HPF1 which completes the catalytic domain. Through ADP-ribosylation, PARPs recruit a variety of factors to the break site and control their activities. However, the timely removal of ADP-ribosylation is also key for genome stability and is mostly performed by two hydrolases: PARG and ARH3. Here, we describe the key writers, readers and erasers of ADP-ribosylation and their contribution to the mounting of the DDR. We also discuss the use of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy and the ways to tackle PARPi treatment resistance.

Chemoenzymatic and Synthetic Approaches To Investigate Aspartate- and Glutamate-ADP-Ribosylation

We report here chemoenzymatic and fully synthetic methodologies to modify aspartate and glutamate side chains with ADP-ribose at specific sites on peptides. Structural analysis of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylated peptides reveals near-quantitative migration of the side chain linkage from the anomeric carbon to the 2″- or 3″-ADP-ribose hydroxyl moieties. We find that this linkage migration pattern is unique to aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation and propose that the observed isomer distribution profile is present in biochemical and cellular environments. After defining distinct stability properties of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation, we devise methods to install homogenous ADP-ribose chains at specific glutamate sites and assemble glutamate-modified peptides into full-length proteins. By implementing these technologies, we show that histone H2B E2 tri-ADP-ribosylation is able to stimulate the chromatin remodeler ALC1 with similar efficiency to histone serine ADP-ribosylation. Our work reveals fundamental principles of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation and enables new strategies to interrogate the biochemical consequences of this widespread protein modification.

Serine ADP-ribosylation in Drosophila provides insights into the evolution of reversible ADP-ribosylation signalling

In the mammalian DNA damage response, ADP-ribosylation signalling is of crucial importance to mark sites of DNA damage as well as recruit and regulate repairs factors. Specifically, the PARP1:HPF1 complex recognises damaged DNA and catalyses the formation of serine-linked ADP-ribosylation marks (mono-Ser-ADPr), which are extended into ADP-ribose polymers (poly-Ser-ADPr) by PARP1 alone. Poly-Ser-ADPr is reversed by PARG, while the terminal mono-Ser-ADPr is removed by ARH3. Despite its significance and apparent evolutionary conservation, little is known about ADP-ribosylation signalling in non-mammalian Animalia. The presence of HPF1, but absence of ARH3, in some insect genomes, including Drosophila species, raises questions regarding the existence and reversal of serine-ADP-ribosylation in these species. Here we show by quantitative proteomics that Ser-ADPr is the major form of ADP-ribosylation in the DNA damage response of Drosophila melanogaster and is dependent on the dParp1:dHpf1 complex. Moreover, our structural and biochemical investigations uncover the mechanism of mono-Ser-ADPr removal by Drosophila Parg. Collectively, our data reveal PARP:HPF1-mediated Ser-ADPr as a defining feature of the DDR in Animalia. The striking conservation within this kingdom suggests that organisms that carry only a core set of ADP-ribosyl metabolising enzymes, such as Drosophila, are valuable model organisms to study the physiological role of Ser-ADPr signalling.

PARPs and ADP-ribosylation: Deciphering the complexity with molecular tools

PARPs catalyze ADP-ribosylation-a post-translational modification that plays crucial roles in biological processes, including DNA repair, transcription, immune regulation, and condensate formation. ADP-ribosylation can be added to a wide range of amino acids with varying lengths and chemical structures, making it a complex and diverse modification. Despite this complexity, significant progress has been made in developing chemical biology methods to analyze ADP-ribosylated molecules and their binding proteins on a proteome-wide scale. Additionally, high-throughput assays have been developed to measure the activity of enzymes that add or remove ADP-ribosylation, leading to the development of inhibitors and new avenues for therapy. Real-time monitoring of ADP-ribosylation dynamics can be achieved using genetically encoded reporters, and next-generation detection reagents have improved the precision of immunoassays for specific forms of ADP-ribosylation. Further development and refinement of these tools will continue to advance our understanding of the functions and mechanisms of ADP-ribosylation in health and disease.

Modular antibodies reveal DNA damage-induced mono-ADP-ribosylation as a second wave of PARP1 signaling

PARP1, an established anti-cancer target that regulates many cellular pathways, including DNA repair signaling, has been intensely studied for decades as a poly(ADP-ribosyl)transferase. Although recent studies have revealed the prevalence of mono-ADP-ribosylation upon DNA damage, it was unknown whether this signal plays an active role in the cell or is just a byproduct of poly-ADP-ribosylation. By engineering SpyTag-based modular antibodies for sensitive and flexible detection of mono-ADP-ribosylation, including fluorescence-based sensors for live-cell imaging, we demonstrate that serine mono-ADP-ribosylation constitutes a second wave of PARP1 signaling shaped by the cellular HPF1/PARP1 ratio. Multilevel chromatin proteomics reveals histone mono-ADP-ribosylation readers, including RNF114, a ubiquitin ligase recruited to DNA lesions through a zinc-finger domain, modulating the DNA damage response and telomere maintenance. Our work provides a technological framework for illuminating ADP-ribosylation in a wide range of applications and biological contexts and establishes mono-ADP-ribosylation by HPF1/PARP1 as an important information carrier for cell signaling.

HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers chromatin relaxation to promote the recruitment of repair factors at sites of DNA damage

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) activity is regulated by its co-factor histone poly(ADP-ribosylation) factor 1 (HPF1). The complex formed by HPF1 and PARP1 catalyzes ADP-ribosylation of serine residues of proteins near DNA breaks, mainly PARP1 and histones. However, the effect of HPF1 on DNA repair regulated by PARP1 remains unclear. Here, we show that HPF1 controls prolonged histone ADP-ribosylation in the vicinity of the DNA breaks by regulating both the number and length of ADP-ribose chains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers the rapid unfolding of chromatin, facilitating access to DNA at sites of damage. This process promotes the assembly of both the homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining repair machineries. Altogether, our data highlight the key roles played by the PARP1/HPF1 complex in regulating ADP-ribosylation signaling as well as the conformation of damaged chromatin at early stages of the DNA damage response.

PARylation of BRCA1 limits DNA break resection through BRCA2 and EXO1

The nucleolytic processing (resection) of a DNA double-strand break (DSB) is a critical step to repair the lesion by homologous recombination (HR). PARylation, which is the attachment of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) units to specific targets by PAR polymerases (PARPs), regulates many steps of HR, including resection. Here, we show that preventing PARylation of the oncosuppressor BRCA1 induces hyper-resection of DSBs through BRCA2 and the EXO1 nuclease. Upon expression of the unPARylatable variant of BRCA1, we observe a reduced 53BP1-RIF1 barrier for resection accompanied by an increase in the recruitment of the RAD51 recombinase. Similar results are observed when cells are treated with the clinically approved PARP inhibitor olaparib. We propose that PARylation of BRCA1 is important to limit the formation of excessively extended DNA filaments, thereby reducing illegitimate chromosome rearrangements. Our results shed light on molecular aspects of HR and on the mechanisms of PARP inhibitor treatment.

Functional Analysis of Histone ADP-Ribosylation In Vitro and in Cells

Gene regulation in the nucleus requires precise control of the molecular processes that dictate how, when, and which genes are transcribed. The posttranslational modification (PTM) of histones in chromatin is an effective means to link cellular signaling to gene expression outcomes. The repertoire of histone PTMs includes phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation, and ADP-ribosylation (ADPRylation). ADPRylation is a reversible PTM that results in the covalent transfer of ADP-ribose units derived from NAD+ to substrate proteins on glutamate, aspartate, serine, and other amino acids. Histones were the first substrate proteins identified for ADPRylation, over five decades ago. Since that time, histone ADPRylation has been shown to be a widespread and critical regulator of chromatin structure and function during transcription, DNA repair, and replication. Here, we describe a set of protocols that allow the user to investigate site-specific histone ADPRylation and its functional consequences in biochemical assays and in cells in a variety of biological systems. With the recent discovery that some cancer-causing histone mutations (i.e., oncohistone mutations) occur at functional sites of regulatory ADPRylation, these protocols may have additional utility in studies of oncology.

A Simple Method to Study ADP-Ribosylation Reversal: From Function to Drug Discovery

ADP-ribosylation is an ancient modification of proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules found in all kingdoms of life as well as in certain viruses. The regulation of fundamental (patho)physiological processes by ADP-ribosylation, including the cellular stress response, inflammation, and immune response to bacterial and viral pathogens, has created a strong interest into the study of modification establishment and removal to explore novel therapeutic approaches. Beyond ADP-ribosylation in humans, direct targeting of factors that alter host ADP-ribosylation signaling (e.g., viral macrodomains) or utilize ADP-ribosylation to manipulate host cell behavior (e.g., bacterial toxins) were shown to reduce virulence and disease severity. However, the realization of these therapeutic potentials is thus far hampered by the unavailability of simple, high-throughput methods to study the modification "writers" and "erasers" and screen for novel inhibitors.Here, we describe a scalable method for the measurement of (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolase activity. The assay relies on the conversion of ADP-ribose released from a modified substrate by the (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolase under investigation into AMP by the phosphodiesterase NudT5 into bioluminescence via a commercially available detection assay. Moreover, this method can be utilized to study the role of nudix- or ENPP-type phosphodiesterases in ADP-ribosylation processing and may also be adapted to investigate the activity of (ADP-ribosyl)transferases. Overall, this method is applicable for both basic biochemical characterization and screening of large drug libraries; hence, it is highly adaptable to diverse project needs.

The Role of PARP1 and PAR in ATP-Independent Nucleosome Reorganisation during the DNA Damage Response

The functioning of the eukaryotic cell genome is mediated by sophisticated protein-nucleic-acid complexes, whose minimal structural unit is the nucleosome. After the damage to genomic DNA, repair proteins need to gain access directly to the lesion; therefore, the initiation of the DNA damage response inevitably leads to local chromatin reorganisation. This review focuses on the possible involvement of PARP1, as well as proteins acting nucleosome compaction, linker histone H1 and non-histone chromatin protein HMGB1. The polymer of ADP-ribose is considered the main regulator during the development of the DNA damage response and in the course of assembly of the correct repair complex.