Detecting recurrent passenger mutations in melanoma by targeted UV damage sequencing

Deciphering the dynamic code: DNA recognition by transcription factors in the ever-changing genome

Transcription factors (TFs) intricately navigate the vast genomic landscape to locate and bind specific DNA sequences for the regulation of gene expression programs. These interactions occur within a dynamic cellular environment, where both DNA and TF proteins experience continual chemical and structural perturbations, including epigenetic modifications, DNA damage, mechanical stress, and post-translational modifications (PTMs). While many of these factors impact TF-DNA binding interactions, understanding their effects remains challenging and incomplete. This review explores the existing literature on these dynamic changes and their potential impact on TF-DNA interactions.

Methods and applications of genome-wide profiling of DNA damage and rare mutations

DNA damage is a threat to genome integrity and can be a cause of many human diseases, owing to either changes in the chemical structure of DNA or conversion of the damage into a mutation, that is, a permanent change in DNA sequence. Determining the exact positions of DNA damage and ensuing mutations in the genome are important for identifying mechanisms of disease aetiology when characteristic mutations are prevalent and probably causative in a particular disease. However, this approach is challenging particularly when levels of DNA damage are low, for example, as a result of chronic exposure to environmental agents or certain endogenous processes, such as the generation of reactive oxygen species. Over the past few years, a comprehensive toolbox of genome-wide methods has been developed for the detection of DNA damage and rare mutations at single-nucleotide resolution in mammalian cells. Here, we review and compare these methods, describe their current applications and discuss future research questions that can now be addressed.

Prognostic and therapeutic roles of SETD2 in cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is an aggressive form of skin cancer with limited treatment options for advanced stages. Prognostic markers that accurately predict patients' outcomes and guide therapeutic strategies are crucial for improving melanoma management. SETD2 (SET Domain-Containing Protein 2), a histone methyltransferase involved in chromatin remodeling and gene regulation, has recently emerged as a tumor suppressor. Its dysfunction is involved in oncogenesis in some cancers, but little is known about its functions in progression and therapeutic response of melanoma.

METHODS

RNA-seq and clinical data from public database were used to evaluate the survival analysis, gene set enrichment, IC50 of therapeutics and immunotherapy response. SETD2 knock-out A375 cell line (A375SETD2ko) was developed by Crispr/cas9 and CCK-8 analysis and nude mice used to evaluate the proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo, while Western blotting tested the MMR-related protein.

RESULTS

SETD2 was commonly down-regulated in melanoma samples which demonstrated an unfavorable survival. Cells without SETD2 expression tend to have a more progressive and invasive behavior, with resistance to chemotherapy. However, they are more sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). They also exhibit inflamed features with lower TIDE (Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion) score and higher tumor mutation burden (TMB), showing that these patients may benefit from immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that SETD2 dysfunction in melanoma implied a poor prognosis and chemotherapy resistance, but highly sensitive to TKIs and immunotherapy, highlighting the prognostic and therapeutic value of SETD2 in cutaneous melanoma.

High UV damage and low repair, but not cytosine deamination, stimulate mutation hotspots at ETS binding sites in melanoma

Noncoding mutation hotspots have been identified in melanoma and many of them occur at the binding sites of E26 transformation-specific (ETS) proteins; however, their formation mechanism and functional impacts are not fully understood. Here, we used UV (Ultraviolet) damage sequencing data and analyzed cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation, DNA repair, and CPD deamination in human cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Our data show prominent CPD hotspots immediately after UV irradiation at ETS binding sites, particularly at sites with a conserved TTCCGG motif, which correlate with mutation hotspots identified in cutaneous melanoma. Additionally, CPDs are repaired slower at ETS binding sites than in flanking DNA. Cytosine deamination in CPDs to uracil is suggested as an important step for UV mutagenesis. However, we found that CPD deamination is significantly suppressed at ETS binding sites, particularly for the CPD hotspot on the 5' side of the ETS motif, arguing against a role for CPD deamination in promoting ETS-associated UV mutations. Finally, we analyzed a subset of frequently mutated promoters, including the ribosomal protein genes RPL13A and RPS20, and found that mutations in the ETS motif can significantly reduce the promoter activity. Thus, our data identify high UV damage and low repair, but not CPD deamination, as the main mechanism for ETS-associated mutations in melanoma and uncover important roles of often-overlooked mutation hotspots in perturbing gene transcription.

Novel insights into bulky DNA damage formation and nucleotide excision repair from high-resolution genomics

DNA damages compromise cell function and fate. Cells of all organisms activate a global DNA damage response that includes a signaling stress response, activation of checkpoints, and recruitment of repair enzymes. Especially deleterious are bulky, helix-distorting damages that block transcription and replication. Due to their miscoding nature, these damages lead to mutations and cancer. In human cells, bulky DNA damages are repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER). To date, the basic mechanism of NER in naked DNA is well defined. Still, there is a fundamental gap in our understanding of how repair is orchestrated despite the packaging of DNA in chromatin, and how it is coordinated with active transcription and replication. The last decade has brought forth huge advances in our ability to detect and assay bulky DNA damages and their repair at single nucleotide resolution across the human genome. Here we review recent findings on the effect of chromatin and DNA-binding proteins on the formation of bulky DNA damages, and novel insights on NER, provided by the recent application of genomic methods.

The many faces of Atypical fibroxanthoma

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is an uncommon, primary dermal neoplasm of uncertain histogenesis, typically originating in the sun-damage skin of the head and neck of the elderly. Since first description in 1958, ∼3000 cases have been reported in the literature. However, the disease is underreported as the neoplasm is considered a standard diagnosis in the last decades. On the other hand, many earlier reports likely have included non-AFX mimics or aggressive pleomorphic dermal sarcomas. In contrast to its alarming high-grade histology, AFX behaves indolently with rare recurrences/ metastatic rate of <2%. The overall 10- and 20-year disease-specific survival rates are ∼ 100% and 98%, respectively. Histologically, AFX displays undifferentiated pleomorphic spindle cell morphology akin to undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), a feature that was the basis of the abandoned historical terminology "MFH of skin". However, in contrast to other undifferentiated sarcomatoid neoplasms, AFX is notorious for its highly variable histology with a plethora of patterns, underlining a wide differential diagnosis. Notably, spindle cell, keloid-like, pleomorphic, epithelioid, rhabdoid, clear cell, foamy cell, granular cell, bizarre cell, pseudoangiomatous, inflammatory, osteoclast-rich, and many others have been recognized with varying frequencies. Immunohistochemically, AFX is characterized by nonspecific profile with block-type expression of CD10 and aberrant p53 pattern and lack of pankeratin and other lineage-specific epithelial, mesenchymal, melanocytic and hematolymphoid markers. Sarcomatoid melanoma, spindle cell carcinoma and cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma are major considerations. Distinction of AFX from pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) is arbitrary and is based on presence of ≥ 1 of four unfavorable histological features: more than minimal subcutaneous involvement, coagulative necrosis, lymphovascular invasion and perineurial invasion.