1
|
Erginkaya M, Cruz T, Brotas M, Marques A, Steck K, Nern A, Torrão F, Varela N, Bock DD, Reiser M, Chiappe ME. A competitive disinhibitory network for robust optic flow processing in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 2025:10.1038/s41593-025-01948-9. [PMID: 40312577 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01948-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
Many animals navigate using optic flow, detecting rotational image velocity differences between their eyes to adjust direction. Forward locomotion produces strong symmetric translational optic flow that can mask these differences, yet the brain efficiently extracts these binocular asymmetries for course control. In Drosophila melanogaster, monocular horizontal system neurons facilitate detection of binocular asymmetries and contribute to steering. To understand these functions, we reconstructed horizontal system cells' central network using electron microscopy datasets, revealing convergent visual inputs, a recurrent inhibitory middle layer and a divergent output layer projecting to the ventral nerve cord and deeper brain regions. Two-photon imaging, GABA receptor manipulations and modeling, showed that lateral disinhibition reduces the output's translational sensitivity while enhancing its rotational selectivity. Unilateral manipulations confirmed the role of interneurons and descending outputs in steering. These findings establish competitive disinhibition as a key circuit mechanism for detecting rotational motion during translation, supporting navigation in dynamic environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mert Erginkaya
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
- Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tomás Cruz
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, and Biozentrum, Department of Cell Biology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Margarida Brotas
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
- CEDOC, iNOVA4Health, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - André Marques
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Kathrin Steck
- Faculty of Science and Medicine, Department of Neuro and Movement Sciences, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Filipa Torrão
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nélia Varela
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Davi D Bock
- University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Michael Reiser
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - M Eugenia Chiappe
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsliah A, Yu SC, Kruk K, Bland D, Burke AT, Gager J, Hebditch J, Silverman B, Willie KP, Willie R, Sorek M, Sterling AR, Kind E, Garner D, Sancer G, Wernet MF, Kim SS, Murthy M, Seung HS. Neuronal parts list and wiring diagram for a visual system. Nature 2024; 634:166-180. [PMID: 39358525 PMCID: PMC11446827 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07981-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
A catalogue of neuronal cell types has often been called a 'parts list' of the brain1, and regarded as a prerequisite for understanding brain function2,3. In the optic lobe of Drosophila, rules of connectivity between cell types have already proven to be essential for understanding fly vision4,5. Here we analyse the fly connectome to complete the list of cell types intrinsic to the optic lobe, as well as the rules governing their connectivity. Most new cell types contain 10 to 100 cells, and integrate information over medium distances in the visual field. Some existing type families (Tm, Li, and LPi)6-10 at least double in number of types. A new serpentine medulla (Sm) interneuron family contains more types than any other. Three families of cross-neuropil types are revealed. The consistency of types is demonstrated by analysing the distances in high-dimensional feature space, and is further validated by algorithms that select small subsets of discriminative features. We use connectivity to hypothesize about the functional roles of cell types in motion, object and colour vision. Connectivity with 'boundary types' that straddle the optic lobe and central brain is also quantified. We showcase the advantages of connectomic cell typing: complete and unbiased sampling, a rich array of features based on connectivity and reduction of the connectome to a substantially simpler wiring diagram of cell types, with immediate relevance for brain function and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Krzysztof Kruk
- Independent researcher, Kielce, Poland
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Doug Bland
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Austin T Burke
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - James Hebditch
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ben Silverman
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Ryan Willie
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marissa Sorek
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emil Kind
- Institut für Biologie-Neurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dustin Garner
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Gizem Sancer
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mathias F Wernet
- Institut für Biologie-Neurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sung Soo Kim
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|