Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Investigation of the Effect of Calibration Curves Obtained from Different Computed Tomography Devices on the Dose Distribution of Tomotherapy Plans

Purpose

This study investigated the effect of Hounsfield units (HU)-relative electron density (RED) calibration curves obtained with devices from three different Computed Tomography (CT) manufacturers on dose distribution in Accuray Precision planning of patients with lung cancer.

Methods

All CT data required for treatment planning system (TPS) were obtained using the Tomotherapy "cheese" phantom. HU RED calibration curves were created with images obtained from Siemens Somatom, GE Optima, and Toshiba Aquilion devices. The obtained calibration curve was extrapolated. CT images of lung cancer patients were acquired on a single device and treatment plans were created. The existing plans were recalculated using three calibration curves and the effect of the HU RED calibration curve on dose distribution was analyzed.

Results

The results showed that different CTs did not produce significant dose differences in organ doses and PTV for Accuray TPS.

Conclusions

Based on clinical judgment, images from different CT devices can be used in treatment planning.

A deep learning-informed interpretation of why and when dose metrics outside the PTV can affect the risk of distant metastasis in SBRT NSCLC patients

PURPOSE

Recent papers suggested a correlation between the risk of distant metastasis (DM) and dose outside the PTV, though conclusions in different publications conflicted. This study resolves these conflicts and provides a compelling explanation of prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset of 478 NSCLC patients treated with SBRT (IMRT or VMAT) was analyzed. We developed a deep learning model for DM prediction and explainable AI was used to identify the most significant prognostic factors. Subsequently, the prognostic power of the extracted features and clinical details were analyzed using conventional statistical methods.

RESULTS

Treatment technique, tumor features, and dosiomic features in a 3 cm wide ring around the PTV (PTV3cm) were identified as the strongest predictors of DM. The Hazard Ratio (HR) for Dmean,PTV3cm was significantly above 1 (p < 0.001). There was no significance of the PTV3cm dose after treatment technique stratification. However, the dose in PTV3cm was found to be a highly significant DM predictor (HR > 1, p = 0.004) when analyzing only VMAT patients with small and spherical tumors (i.e., sphericity > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The main reason for conflicting conclusions in previous papers was inconsistent datasets and insufficient consideration of confounding variables. No causal correlation between the risk of DM and dose outside the PTV was found. However, the mean dose to PTV3cm can be a significant predictor of DM in small spherical targets treated with VMAT, which might clinically imply considering larger PTV margins for smaller, more spherical tumors (e.g., if IGTV > 2 cm, then margin ≤ 7 mm, else margin > 7 mm).

Evaluation and Comparison of the Dose Received by the Mandible, Maxilla, and Teeth in Two Methods of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy

Background

Using three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT) and helical tomotherapy (HT), this study examines and contrasts the dosage received by the mandible, maxilla, and teeth.

Methods

Sixteen patients with head-and-neck cancer (H and NC) were the subject of treatment planning at the Seyyed Al-Shohada Hospital in Isfahan, Iran. This study examined target coverage quality, exposure of healthy tissue, and radiation delivery effectiveness.

Results

In terms of a number of measures, including D2%, D50%, Dmean, V95%, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the planning target volume (PTV) and D2%, D98%, Dmean, V95%, CI, and HI for the nodal PTV, HT showed considerable gains over 3D-CRT. The brainstem, D1cc, and D10cc received considerably lower maximum dosages in HT. Measurements of the right and left cochleas (Dmean, V55, and Dmax) revealed decreases in HT, with Dmean revealing the most significant variations. The Dmean and Dmax values for HT significantly decreased in constrictors as well. In terms of several HT-related indicators, the larynx, optic chiasm, optic nerves, oral cavity, mandible, thyroid, and parotid glands all showed considerable decreases.

Conclusion

The findings of the comparison of the two treatment approaches revealed that the HT method was more than 50% more effective than the 3D-CRT method in sustaining organs at risk (OARs) and the target volume dose. In general, dosimetric coverage, homogeneity, conformity indices, and the absence of cold and hot patches showed that HT produced targets with greater accuracy than 3D-CRT. In addition, HT outperformed 3D-CRT in protecting important structures (OARs). HT as a result has the potential to be a more effective method of treatment for those with H and NC and involvement of regional lymph nodes.

Clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced rhinosinusitis following VMAT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study

Background

We aimed to investigate the clinical and dosimetric factors associated with radiation-induced rhinosinusitis, and further elucidate the optimal dose-volume constraints for nasopharyngeal cancer patients who underwent volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods

A retrospective review of 196 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who underwent definitive VMAT between August 2018 and May 2021 was conducted. Both clinical and dose-volume histogram (DVH) data of NPC patients without rhinosinusitis at baseline were selected for analysis.

Results

The cumulative incidence of post-RT rhinosinusitis at the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months, and >1 year were 29.6 %, 41.3 %, 42.9 %, and 45.4 %, and 47.4 %, respectively. Nasal irrigation was negatively associated with post-RT rhinosinusitis (p < 0.001). Higher cumulative incidences of maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis were associated with V70 > 1.16 % and >1.00 %, respectively (p = 0.027 and p = 0.002). Sphenoid sinusitis was more frequent when Dmax(maxillary sinus) exceeded 69.2Gy (p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Regular nasal irrigation may reduce the development of rhinosinusitis. Dose-volume constraints of V70 and Dmax to the maxillary sinus are suggested for VMAT planning. Patients exceeding these thresholds should be closely monitored and potentially offered preventative interventions within 3-6 months post-RT.

Dosimetric comparison of four radiotherapy techniques for stage III non‑small cell lung cancer

The present study was implemented to compare the dosimetric parameters of the target dose coverage and critical structures in the treatment planning of four radiotherapy techniques [namely, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hybrid IMRT (h-IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)] for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) qualified plans for medical physicists, therapists and physicians. A total of 40 patients confirmed to have stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled, and four plans were designed for each patient. The prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was assigned as 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI) and parameters of organs at risk (OARs) were calculated. For the PTV, the CI for VMAT was found to be the highest of all the four techniques (P<0.05), whereas the HI for the h-IMRT technique was found to be the lowest (P<0.05). Concerning the OARs, for the percentage of lung volume receiving a dose >5 Gy (lung V₅), the highest value was obtained with VMAT (P<0.05), whereas for lung V₃₀ and heart V₃₀, the VMAT and IMRT techniques were found to be better compared with 3D-CRT and h-IMRT (P<0.05). For esophagus V₅₀, the maximal dose (D_max) and mean dose for the IMRT technique displayed the best results (P<0.05), and in the case of the spinal cord, the D_max with VMAT showed a significant advantage over the other techniques (P<0.05). The treatment monitor units (MUs) in IMRT were found to be the largest (P<0.05), whereas the treatment time with VMAT was the shortest (P<0.05). For smaller PTVs, VMAT was the technique that provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing of the heart. Compared with 3D-CRT alone, adding 20% IMRT to the 3D-CRT base plan was shown to improve the plan quality, and IMRT and VMAT, as techniques, had better dose coverage and sparing of OARs. Furthermore, for patients in whom the lung V5 could be kept low enough, VMAT potentially offered a good alternative to the technique to IMRT, thereby offering additional possibilities for sparing of other OARs, and decreasing the MUs and treatment time.

Helical tomotherapy and two types of volumetric modulated arc therapy: dosimetric and clinical comparison for several cancer sites

Radiotherapy accelerators have undergone continuous technological developments. We investigated the differences between Radixact™ and VMAT treatment plans. Sixty patients were included in this study. Dosimetric comparison between the Radixact™ and VMAT plans was performed for six cancer sites: whole-brain, head and neck, lymphoma, lung, prostate, and rectum. The VMAT plans were generated with two Elekta linear accelerators (Synergy^® and Versa HD™). The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organs-at-risk dose constraints, and four dosimetric indexes were considered. The deliverability of the plans was assessed using quality assurance (gamma index evaluation) measurements; clinical judgment was included in the assessment. The mean AAPM TG218 (3%-2 mm, global normalization) gamma index values were 99.4%, 97.8%, and 96.6% for Radixact™, Versa HD™, and Synergy®, respectively. Radixact™ performed better than Versa HD™ in terms of dosimetric indexes, hippocampi D_100%, spinal cord D_max, rectum V_{38.4  Gy}, bladder V_{30 Gy}, and V_{40 Gy}. Versa HD™ saved more of the (lungs-PTV) V_{5 Gy} and (lungs-PTV) D_mean, heart D_mean, breasts V_{4 Gy}, and bowel V_{45 Gy}. Regarding Synergy^®, the head and neck Radixact™ plan saved more of the parotid gland, oral cavity, and supraglottic larynx. From a clinical point of view, for the head and neck, prostate, and rectal sites, the Radixact™ and Versa HD™ plans were similar; Radixact™ plans were preferable for the head and neck and rectum to Synergy^® plans. The quality of linac plans has improved, and differences with tomotherapy have decreased. However, tomotherapy continues to be an essential add-on in multi-machine departments.

Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy, Volume-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Fixed-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dosimetric parameters of different radiotherapy plans [helical tomotherapy (HT), volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (FF-IMRT)] for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 15 patients with locally advanced NPC were chosen for this retrospective analysis and replanned for HT, VMAT, and FF-IMRT. The prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose for the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes was 70 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction, delivered over 33 fractions). The prescribed PTV dose for the high-risk subclinical region was 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction, delivered over 33 fractions). The dosimetric parameters of the PTV and organs at risk (OARs) and the efficiency of radiation delivery were assessed and compared using the paired-samples t-test.

RESULTS

Compared with VMAT and FF-IMRT plans, HT plans significantly improved the mean conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). The HT plans reduced the maximum doses delivered to OARs, such as the brainstem, spinal cord, and optic nerves, and significantly reduced the volume delivered to the high-dose region, especially when examining the V 30 value of the parotid glands. However, VMAT reduced the treatment time and improved the efficiency of radiation delivery compared with HT.

CONCLUSIONS

For locally advanced NPC, the results showed that HT and VMAT possessed better target homogeneity and conformity, reducing the dose delivered to OARs compared with conventional FF-IMRT, with HT achieving the best effect. Among the techniques studied, VMAT had the shortest radiation delivery time. The results of this study can provide guidance for the selection of appropriate radiation technologies used to treat patients with locally advanced NPC who are undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Comparison of combinations of irradiation techniques and jaw conditions in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer

Purpose

To assist in the selection of a suitable combination of an irradiation technique and jaw condition in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for lung cancer treatment plans.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy were enrolled retrospectively. They were categorized as having central lung cancer, peripheral lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node metastasis (peripheral E lung cancer), and peripheral lung cancer without mediastinal lymph node metastasis (peripheral N lung cancer). Four treatment plans were designed for each patient: fixed jaw and adaptive jaw IMRT technique (FJ‐IMRT and JA‐IMRT), and fixed jaw and jaw tracking VMAT technique (FJ‐VMAT and JT‐VMAT). The dose parameters of the four group plans were compared and analyzed.

Results

Compared to FJ‐IMRT, JA‐IMRT significantly reduced the mean dose (D_mean) and volume percentage of 5 Gy (V_5Gy) of the total lung in central and peripheral N lung cancer. Similarly, compared to FJ‐VMAT, JT‐VMAT provided better protection to most organs at risk (OARs), particularly for total lung and heart. In comparison with IMRT, VMAT significantly improved the conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume for the three lung cancer classifications, and it reduced the dose of almost all OARs except V_5Gy and D_mean of the total lung. Moreover, the mean monitor units of the VMAT groups were far lower than the IMRT groups.

Conclusion

Based on the dosimetric findings and considering clinical data published on lung and heart side effects, we propose recommendations on the preferred treatment technique based on tumor location and pulmonary function. For central lung cancer with normal pulmonary function, we advise JT‐VMAT techniques. Conversely, for central lung cancer with poor pulmonary function, we recommend JA‐IMRT techniques. We advocate JA‐IMRT for peripheral E lung cancer. For peripheral N lung cancer, JT‐VMAT techniques are strongly recommended.

Comparison between atlas and convolutional neural network based automatic segmentation of multiple organs at risk in non-small cell lung cancer

Delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is important but time consuming for radiotherapy planning. Automatic segmentation of OARs based on convolutional neural network (CNN) has been established for lung cancer patients at our institution. The aim of this study is to compare automatic segmentation based on CNN (AS-CNN) with automatic segmentation based on atlas (AS-Atlas) in terms of the efficiency and accuracy of OARs contouring.The OARs, including the lungs, esophagus, heart, liver, and spinal cord, of 19 non-small cell lung cancer patients were delineated using three methods: AS-CNN, AS-Atlas in the Pinnacle-software, and manual delineation (MD) by a senior radiation oncologist. MD was used as the ground-truth reference, and the segmentation efficiency was evaluated by the time spent per patient. The accuracy was evaluated using the Mean surface distance (MSD) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare these indexes between the 2 automatic segmentation models.In the 19 testing cases, both AS-CNN and AS-Atlas saved substantial time compared with MD. AS-CNN was more efficient than AS-Atlas (1.6 min vs 2.4 min, P < .001). In terms of the accuracy, AS-CNN performed well in the esophagus, with a DSC of 73.2%. AS-CNN was better than AS-Atlas in segmenting the left lung (DSC: 94.8% vs 93.2%, P = .01; MSD: 1.10 cm vs 1.73 cm, P < .001) and heart (DSC: 89.3% vs 85.8%, P = .05; MSD: 1.65 cm vs 3.66 cm, P < .001). Furthermore, AS-CNN exhibited superior performance in segmenting the liver (DSC: 93.7% vs 93.6%, P = .81; MSD: 2.03 cm VS 2.11 cm, P = .66). The results obtained from AS-CNN and AS-Atlas were similar in segmenting the right lung. However, the performance of AS-CNN in the spinal cord was inferior to that of AS-Atlas (DSC: 82.1% vs 86.8%, P = .01; MSD: 0.87 cm vs 0.66 cm, P = .01).Our study demonstrated that AS-CNN significantly reduced the contouring time and outperformed AS-Atlas in most cases. AS-CNN can potentially be used for OARs segmentation in patients with pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer.

Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and hybrid (3DCRT-VMAT) technique for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Aim:

The purpose of the present study is to compare hybrid [three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy-volumetric-modulated arc therapy (3DCRT-VMAT)] and helical tomotherapy (HT) techniques in terms of both planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) in the plans we made in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Material and methods:

Radiotherapy was planned for 15 locally advanced NSCLC patients with 2 different techniques. Large tumours with positive mediastinal lymph nodes were preferred. The prescription dose was determined as 60 Gy at 30 fractions.

Results:

Mean PTV volume was 602·5 cc (range: 265–1461). Mean total lung volume was 4264 cc (range: 1885–6803). Homogeneity index, Dmean, Dmax, D2 and V105 were found to be lower in HT, V100, total monitor units (MU) and total beam on time were found to be lower in the hybrid plan. Total lung Dmean was found to be 17 Gy in both techniques. V10 value was 42·85 in the hybrid plan and 48·67 in HT (p = 0·037). Heart Dmean was 14·5 Gy in the hybrid plan and 18·7 in HT (p < 0·001), and V30 values were 18·1 and 22·9, respectively (p = 0·009).

Conclusion:

Suitable dose coverage and OAR doses can be provided with both techniques. Especially the opposite lung, heart and oesophagus doses can be kept lower with the hybrid plan, and lower MU and shorter beam on time can be provided.

Comparison of Dosimetric Gains Provided by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volume-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Helical Tomotherapy for High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE

Because of the poor prognosis for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients, it is important to increase the dose of the tumor to improve the efficacy while minimizing the dose of organs at risk (OARs). Thus, we evaluated the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for high-grade glioma (HGG).

METHODS

A total of 42 HGG patients were retrospectively selected who had undergone helical tomotherapy; then, IMRT and VMAT plans were generated and optimized for comparison after contouring crucial neuronal structures for neurogenesis and neurocognitive function. IMRT and VMAT were optimized with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) (Version 11.0.31) and HT using TomoTherapy Hi-Art Software (Version 2.0.7) (Accuray, Madison, WI, USA). All three techniques were optimized for simultaneously delivering 60 Gy to planning target volume (PTV) 1 and 50-54 Gy to PTV2. We also analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTVs and organ at risk (OAR) sparing.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the PTV coverage among IMRT, VMAT, or HT. As for the HI, HT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.09 ± 0.03, PTV2 HI: 0.17 ± 0.05) had the best homogeneity when compared to IMRT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.10 ± 0.04, PTV2 HI: 0.18 ± 0.04) and VMAT plans (PTV1 HI: 0.11 ± 0.03, PTV2 HI: 0.20 ± 0.03). The CI value of HT (PTV1 CI: 0.98 ± 0.03, PTV2: 0.98 ± 0.05) was closest to the optimal value. Except for the IMRT and VMAT groups, there were statistically significant differences between the other two groups of the CI values in both PTV1 and PTV2. The other comparison values were statistically significant except for the optic nerve, and VMAT had the best sparing of the optic chiasm. The mean and max doses of OARs declined significantly in HT.

CONCLUSIONS

For high-grade glioma patients, HT had superior outcomes in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing as compared with IMRT/VMAT.

Tomotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer might increase bone marrow toxicity in comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy

This study compares dosimetric parameters in these following 3 neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) methods in treating locally advanced esophagus cancer: helical tomotherapy (TOMO), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). It is aimed to ascertain the efficient technique that kept high target coverage and availed the dose sparing of bone marrow (BM). This research collected data on 11 patients from October 2014 to June 2017 who received NCRT for pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer. The prescription doses to the planning target volume (PTV) were all given as 60 Gy (2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week). Three physicists via Varian Eclipse Treatment Planning System and Accuray planning stations redesigned 5 radiotherapy plans (fixed 5-field IMRT, fixed 7-field IMRT, 2-arc VMAT, 3-arc VMAT, and TOMO) for each of the patients. At the end of the planning, we then appraised the dosimetric quality based on the PTV parameters and the doses to organs at risk (OARs). In the study VMAT reached the highest conformity index (CI; 2 arcs VMAT: 0.74 ± 0.10; 3 arcs VMAT: 0.78 ± 0.07; p< 0.05), and IMRT the lowest homogeneity index (HI; fivefields IMRT: 0.12 ± 0.03; sevenfields IMRT: 0.10 ± 0.02; p< 0.05). Besides, 7 fields IMRT (0.10 ± 0.02) achieved superior HI to that of 5 fields IMRT (0.12 ± 0.03, p< 0.01). TOMO (p< 0.05) and VMAT (p< 0.05) were both significantly superior to IMRT in terms of the dose to lung (V₅, V₁₀, V₁₅, V₂₀, and V₃₀). These 5 radiation techniques were similar regarding the dose to heart (V₅, V₂₀, and V₃₀), but IMRT (5 fields IMRT: 19.27 ± 5.33; 7 fields IMRT: 20.05 ± 4.19) significantly raised the dose to the V₅₀ of the heart when compared to VMAT (2 arcs VMAT: 16.6 ± 5.68; 3 arcs VMAT: 15.04 ± 5.75; p< 0.05) and TOMO (15.05 ± 4.7, p< 0.05). VMAT reduced the dose to BM (V₅, V₁₀, V₂₀, and V₃₀) as compared to TOMO (p< 0.05) and IMRT (p< 0.05). The CI of VMAT was the supreme one in those of the techniques in this study, so was the HI of IMRT. VMAT also provided another advantage that it reduced the dose to the BM. TOMO ameliorated the dose sparing of the lung, but the dose that the BM absorbed from TOMO was of some concern about BM toxicity.