1
|
Shang C, Sakurai K, Nihashi T, Arahata Y, Takeda A, Ishii K, Ishii K, Matsuda H, Ito K, Kato T, Toyama H, Nakamura A. Comparison of consistency in centiloid scale among different analytical methods in amyloid PET: the CapAIBL, VIZCalc, and Amyquant methods. Ann Nucl Med 2024; 38:460-467. [PMID: 38512444 PMCID: PMC11108942 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01919-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Centiloid (CL) scale is a standardized measure for quantifying amyloid deposition in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We aimed to assess the agreement among 3 CL calculation methods: CapAIBL, VIZCalc, and Amyquant. METHODS This study included 192 participants (mean age: 71.5 years, range: 50-87 years), comprising 55 with Alzheimer's disease, 65 with mild cognitive impairment, 13 with non-Alzheimer's dementia, and 59 cognitively normal participants. All the participants were assessed using the three CL calculation methods. Spearman's rank correlation, linear regression, Friedman tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess data correlations, linear associations, method differences, and systematic bias, respectively. RESULTS Strong correlations (rho = 0.99, p < .001) were observed among the CL values calculated using the three methods. Scatter plots and regression lines visually confirmed these strong correlations and met the validation criteria. Despite the robust correlations, a significant difference in CL value between CapAIBL and Amyquant was observed (36.1 ± 39.7 vs. 34.9 ± 39.4; p < .001). In contrast, no significant differences were found between CapAIBL and VIZCalc or between VIZCalc and Amyquant. The Bland-Altman analysis showed no observable systematic bias between the methods. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated strong agreement among the three methods for calculating CL values. Despite minor variations in the absolute values of the Centiloid scores obtained using these methods, the overall agreement suggests that they are interchangeable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Shang
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Keita Sakurai
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Nihashi
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Yutaka Arahata
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Akinori Takeda
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Kazunari Ishii
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Team for Neuroimaging Research, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsuda
- Department of Biofunctional Imaging, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Drug Discovery and Cyclotron Research Center, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Toyama
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Akinori Nakamura
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
- Department of Biomarker Research, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wagatsuma K, Sakata M, Miwa K, Hamano Y, Kawakami H, Kamitaka Y, Yamao T, Miyaji N, Ishibashi K, Tago T, Toyohara J, Ishii K. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear without PSF correction in amyloid PET images. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:37. [PMID: 38647924 PMCID: PMC11035535 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00641-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction, which incorporates point-spread-function (PSF) correction, provides higher signal-to-noise ratios and more accurate quantitation than conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. However, applying PSF correction to brain PET imaging is controversial due to Gibbs artefacts that manifest as unpredicted cortical uptake enhancement. The present study aimed to validate whether BPL without PSF would be useful for amyloid PET imaging. METHODS Images were acquired from Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms for phantom study and 71 patients administered with [18F]flutemetamol in clinical study using a Discovery MI. All images were reconstructed using OSEM, BPL with PSF correction, and BPL without PSF correction. Count profile, %contrast, recovery coefficients (RCs), and image noise were calculated from the images acquired from the phantoms. Amyloid β deposition in patients was visually assessed by two physicians and quantified based on the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). RESULTS The overestimated radioactivity in profile curves was eliminated using BPL without PSF correction. The %contrast and image noise decreased with increasing β values in phantom images. Image quality and RCs were better using BPL with, than without PSF correction or OSEM. An optimal β value of 600 was determined for BPL without PSF correction. Visual evaluation almost agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91-0.97), without depending on reconstruction methods. Composite SUVRs did not significantly differ between reconstruction methods. CONCLUSION Gibbs artefacts disappeared from phantom images using the BPL without PSF correction. Visual and quantitative evaluation of [18F]flutemetamol imaging was independent of the reconstruction method. The BPL without PSF correction could be the standard reconstruction method for amyloid PET imaging, despite being qualitatively inferior to BPL with PSF correction for [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Wagatsuma
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitazato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan.
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.
| | - Muneyuki Sakata
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Kenta Miwa
- Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima-shi, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan
| | - Yumi Hamano
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitazato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0373, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kawakami
- GE HealthCare Japan, 4-7-127 Asahigaoka, Hino-shi, Tokyo, 191-8503, Japan
| | - Yuto Kamitaka
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Tensho Yamao
- Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima-shi, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan
| | - Noriaki Miyaji
- Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6 Sakaemachi, Fukushima-shi, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishibashi
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Tago
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Jun Toyohara
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biechele G, Rauchmann BS, Janowitz D, Buerger K, Franzmeier N, Weidinger E, Guersel S, Schuster S, Finze A, Harris S, Lindner S, Albert NL, Wetzel C, Rupprecht R, Rominger A, Palleis C, Katzdobler S, Burow L, Kurz C, Zaganjori M, Trappmann LK, Goldhardt O, Grimmer T, Haeckert J, Keeser D, Stoecklein S, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Bartenstein P, Levin J, Höglinger GU, Simons M, Perneczky R, Brendel M. Associations between sex, body mass index and the individual microglial response in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation 2024; 21:30. [PMID: 38263017 PMCID: PMC10804830 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03020-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES 18-kDa translocator protein position-emission-tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging emerged for in vivo assessment of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. Sex and obesity effects on TSPO-PET binding have been reported for cognitively normal humans (CN), but such effects have not yet been systematically evaluated in patients with AD. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of sex and obesity on the relationship between β-amyloid-accumulation and microglial activation in AD. METHODS 49 patients with AD (29 females, all Aβ-positive) and 15 Aβ-negative CN (8 female) underwent TSPO-PET ([18F]GE-180) and β-amyloid-PET ([18F]flutemetamol) imaging. In 24 patients with AD (14 females), tau-PET ([18F]PI-2620) was additionally available. The brain was parcellated into 218 cortical regions and standardized-uptake-value-ratios (SUVr, cerebellar reference) were calculated. Per region and tracer, the regional increase of PET SUVr (z-score) was calculated for AD against CN. The regression derived linear effect of regional Aβ-PET on TSPO-PET was used to determine the Aβ-plaque-dependent microglial response (slope) and the Aβ-plaque-independent microglial response (intercept) at the individual patient level. All read-outs were compared between sexes and tested for a moderation effect of sex on associations with body mass index (BMI). RESULTS In AD, females showed higher mean cortical TSPO-PET z-scores (0.91 ± 0.49; males 0.30 ± 0.75; p = 0.002), while Aβ-PET z-scores were similar. The Aβ-plaque-independent microglial response was stronger in females with AD (+ 0.37 ± 0.38; males with AD - 0.33 ± 0.87; p = 0.006), pronounced at the prodromal stage. On the contrary, the Aβ-plaque-dependent microglial response was not different between sexes. The Aβ-plaque-independent microglial response was significantly associated with tau-PET in females (Braak-II regions: r = 0.757, p = 0.003), but not in males. BMI and the Aβ-plaque-independent microglial response were significantly associated in females (r = 0.44, p = 0.018) but not in males (BMI*sex interaction: F(3,52) = 3.077, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION While microglia response to fibrillar Aβ is similar between sexes, women with AD show a stronger Aβ-plaque-independent microglia response. This sex difference in Aβ-independent microglial activation may be associated with tau accumulation. BMI is positively associated with the Aβ-plaque-independent microglia response in females with AD but not in males, indicating that sex and obesity need to be considered when studying neuroinflammation in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Biechele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Neuroradiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolai Franzmeier
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Endy Weidinger
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Selim Guersel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schuster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Anika Finze
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Harris
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Wetzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Rupprecht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carla Palleis
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Katzdobler
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Burow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Kurz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mirlind Zaganjori
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena-Katharina Trappmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Goldhardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Haeckert
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Keeser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Stoecklein
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Mikael Simons
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Neuronal Cell Biology, TU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, University of Munich, Marchioninstraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho SH, Kim S, Choi SM, Kim BC. ATN Classification and Clinical Progression of the Amyloid-Negative Group in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Participants. Chonnam Med J 2024; 60:51-58. [PMID: 38304128 PMCID: PMC10828081 DOI: 10.4068/cmj.2024.60.1.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease has recently been classified using three biological markers (amyloid [A], tau [T], and neurodegeneration [N]) to help elucidate its progression. We aimed to investigate whether there were differences between cognitive function and the clinical dementia symptoms over time relative to the ATN classification in the amyloid-negative group. In the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort, 310 participants who underwent all the tests required for ATN classification were enrolled. The cognitive function score differences (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 13 [ADAS-Cog 13], Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes [CDR-SOB], and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) between the groups were analyzed using the analysis of covariance and score changes over time with a linear mixed-effects model. In the cross-sectional analysis, ADAS-Cog 13 scores were higher for A-T-N+ and A-T+N+ than for A-T-N- (p<0.001) and A-T+N- (p<0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, CDR-SOB scores for A-T+N+ deteriorated faster than A-T-N- (p<0.001), A-T+N- (p<0.001) and A-T-N+ (p<0.001). Hippocampal atrophy progressed faster in A-T-N+ (p<0.001) and A-T+N+ (p=0.02) than in A-T-N-. Through this study, we discovered that even in individuals classified as amyloid negative, neurodegeneration with tau deposition exacerbates cognitive decline and worsens clinical symptoms, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring and observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Hyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Shina Kim
- Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seong-Min Choi
- Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Byeong Chae Kim
- Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bollack A, Markiewicz PJ, Wink AM, Prosser L, Lilja J, Bourgeat P, Schott JM, Coath W, Collij LE, Pemberton HG, Farrar G, Barkhof F, Cash DM. Evaluation of novel data-driven metrics of amyloid β deposition for longitudinal PET studies. Neuroimage 2023; 280:120313. [PMID: 37595816 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Positron emission tomography (PET) provides in vivo quantification of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. Established methods for assessing Aβ burden can be affected by physiological and technical factors. Novel, data-driven metrics have been developed to account for these sources of variability. We aimed to evaluate the performance of four of these amyloid PET metrics against conventional techniques, using a common set of criteria. METHODS Three cohorts were used for evaluation: Insight 46 (N=464, [18F]florbetapir), AIBL (N=277, [18F]flutemetamol), and an independent test-retest data (N=10, [18F]flutemetamol). Established metrics of amyloid tracer uptake included the Centiloid (CL) and where dynamic data was available, the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND). The four data-driven metrics computed were the amyloid load (Aβ load), the Aβ-PET pathology accumulation index (Aβ index), the Centiloid derived from non-negative matrix factorisation (CLNMF), and the amyloid pattern similarity score (AMPSS). These metrics were evaluated using reliability and repeatability in test-retest data, associations with BPND and CL, variability of the rate of change and sample size estimates to detect a 25% slowing in Aβ accumulation. RESULTS All metrics showed good reliability. Aβ load, Aβ index and CLNMF were strong associated with the BPND. The associations with CL suggest that cross-sectional measures of CLNMF, Aβ index and Aβ load are robust across studies. Sample size estimates for secondary prevention trial scenarios were the lowest for CLNMF and Aβ load compared to the CL. CONCLUSION Among the novel data-driven metrics evaluated, the Aβ load, the Aβ index and the CLNMF can provide comparable performance to more established quantification methods of Aβ PET tracer uptake. The CLNMF and Aβ load could offer a more precise alternative to CL, although further studies in larger cohorts should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Pawel J Markiewicz
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Prosser
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | | | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - William Coath
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hugh G Pemberton
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK; GE HealthCare, Amersham, UK; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK; Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - David M Cash
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finze A, Biechele G, Rauchmann BS, Franzmeier N, Palleis C, Katzdobler S, Weidinger E, Guersel S, Schuster S, Harris S, Schmitt J, Beyer L, Gnörich J, Lindner S, Albert NL, Wetzel CH, Rupprecht R, Rominger A, Danek A, Burow L, Kurz C, Tato M, Utecht J, Papazov B, Zaganjori M, Trappmann LK, Goldhardt O, Grimmer T, Haeckert J, Janowitz D, Buerger K, Keeser D, Stoecklein S, Dietrich O, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Barthel H, Sabri O, Bartenstein P, Simons M, Haass C, Höglinger GU, Levin J, Perneczky R, Brendel M. Individual regional associations between Aβ-, tau- and neurodegeneration (ATN) with microglial activation in patients with primary and secondary tauopathies. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:4438-4450. [PMID: 37495886 PMCID: PMC10827660 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02188-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau aggregation as well as neuronal injury and atrophy (ATN) are the major hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and biomarkers for these hallmarks have been linked to neuroinflammation. However, the detailed regional associations of these biomarkers with microglial activation in individual patients remain to be elucidated. We investigated a cohort of 55 patients with AD and primary tauopathies and 10 healthy controls that underwent TSPO-, Aβ-, tau-, and perfusion-surrogate-PET, as well as structural MRI. Z-score deviations for 246 brain regions were calculated and biomarker contributions of Aβ (A), tau (T), perfusion (N1), and gray matter atrophy (N2) to microglial activation (TSPO, I) were calculated for each individual subject. Individual ATN-related microglial activation was correlated with clinical performance and CSF soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) concentrations. In typical and atypical AD, regional tau was stronger and more frequently associated with microglial activation when compared to regional Aβ (AD: βT = 0.412 ± 0.196 vs. βA = 0.142 ± 0.123, p < 0.001; AD-CBS: βT = 0.385 ± 0.176 vs. βA = 0.131 ± 0.186, p = 0.031). The strong association between regional tau and microglia reproduced well in primary tauopathies (βT = 0.418 ± 0.154). Stronger individual associations between tau and microglial activation were associated with poorer clinical performance. In patients with 4RT, sTREM2 levels showed a positive association with tau-related microglial activation. Tau pathology has strong regional associations with microglial activation in primary and secondary tauopathies. Tau and Aβ related microglial response indices may serve as a two-dimensional in vivo assessment of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Grants
- EXC 2145 SyNergy - ID 390857198 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- EXC 2155 - project number 39087428 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- HO2402/18-1 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- FOR-2858 project numbers 403161218, 421887978 and 422188432 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- 19063p Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (Alzheimer Forschung Initiative e.V.)
- GUH was additionally funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, 01KU1403A EpiPD; 01EK1605A HitTau; 01DH18025 TauTherapy); European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (Improve-PSP); VolkswagenStiftung (Niedersächsisches Vorab); Petermax-Müller Foundation (Etiology and Therapy of Synucleinopathies and Tauopathies). The Lüneburg Heritage and Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung have supported the work of CP. The Hirnliga e.V. supported recruitment and imaging of the ActiGliA cohort (Manfred-Strohscheer-Stiftung) by a grant to BSR and MB.
- TG received consulting fees from AbbVie, Alector, Anavex, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Functional Neuromodulation, Grifols, Iqvia, Noselab, Novo Nordisk, NuiCare, Orphanzyme, Roche Diagnostics, Roche Pharma, UCB, and Vivoryon; lecture fees from Grifols, Medical Tribune, Novo Nordisk, Roche Pharma, and Schwabe; and has received grants to his institution from Roche Diagnostics.
- CH collaborates with Denali Therapeutics. CH is chief advisor of ISAR Bioscience and a member of the advisory board of AviadoBio.
- Günter Höglinger participated in industry-sponsored research projects from Abbvie, Biogen, Biohaven, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, UCB; serves as a consultant for Abbvie, Alzprotect, Aprineua, Asceneuron, Bial, Biogen, Biohaven, Kyowa Kirin, Lundbeck, Novartis, Retrotope, Roche, Sanofi, UCB; received honoraria for scientific presentations from Abbvie, Bayer Vital, Bial, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, Roche, Teva, UCB, Zambon; holds a patent on Treatment of Synucleinopathies. United States Patent No.: US 10,918,628 B2: EP 17 787 904.6-1109 / 3 525 788; received publication royalties from Academic Press, Kohlhammer, and Thieme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Finze
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gloria Biechele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolai Franzmeier
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carla Palleis
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Katzdobler
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Endy Weidinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Selim Guersel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schuster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Harris
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Schmitt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Gnörich
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian H Wetzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Rupprecht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Danek
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Burow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Kurz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maia Tato
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Utecht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris Papazov
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mirlind Zaganjori
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena-Katharina Trappmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Goldhardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Haeckert
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Keeser
- NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Stoecklein
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Olaf Dietrich
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Mikael Simons
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Haass
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Chair of Metabolic Biochemistry, Biomedical Center (BMC), Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neurosciences (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bun S, Ito D, Tezuka T, Kubota M, Ueda R, Takahata K, Moriguchi S, Kurose S, Momota Y, Suzuki N, Morimoto A, Hoshino Y, Seki M, Mimura Y, Shikimoto R, Yamamoto Y, Hoshino T, Sato Y, Tabuchi H, Mimura M. Performance of plasma Aβ42/40, measured using a fully automated immunoassay, across a broad patient population in identifying amyloid status. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:149. [PMID: 37667408 PMCID: PMC10476307 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma biomarkers have emerged as promising screening tools for Alzheimer's disease (AD) because of their potential to detect amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation in the brain. One such candidate is the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40). Unlike previous research that used traditional immunoassay, recent studies that measured plasma Aβ42/40 using fully automated platforms reported promising results. However, its utility should be confirmed using a broader patient population, focusing on the potential for early detection. METHODS We recruited 174 participants, including healthy controls (HC) and patients with clinical diagnoses of AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies/Parkinson's disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and others, from a university memory clinic. We examined the performance of plasma Aβ42/40, measured using the fully automated high-sensitivity chemiluminescence enzyme (HISCL) immunoassay, in detecting amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET)-derived Aβ pathology. We also compared its performance with that of Simoa-based plasma phosphorylated tau at residue 181 (p-tau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL). RESULTS Using the best cut-off derived from the Youden Index, plasma Aβ42/40 yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.949 in distinguishing visually assessed 18F-Florbetaben amyloid PET positivity. The plasma Aβ42/40 had a significantly superior AUC than p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL in the 167 participants with measurements for all four biomarkers. Next, we analyzed 99 participants, including only the HC and those with MCI, and discovered that plasma Aβ42/40 outperformed the other plasma biomarkers, suggesting its ability to detect early amyloid accumulation. Using the Centiloid scale (CL), Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between plasma Aβ42/40 and CL was -0.767. Among the 15 participants falling within the CL values indicative of potential future amyloid accumulation (CL between 13.5 and 35.7), plasma Aβ42/40 categorized 61.5% (8/13) as Aβ-positive, whereas visual assessment of amyloid PET identified 20% (3/15) as positive. CONCLUSION Plasma Aβ42/40 measured using the fully automated HISCL platform showed excellent performance in identifying Aβ accumulation in the brain in a well-characterized cohort. This equipment may be useful for screening amyloid pathology because it has the potential to detect early amyloid pathology and is readily applied in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogyoku Bun
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Ito
- Memory Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiki Tezuka
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahito Kubota
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Ueda
- Office of Radiation Technology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Takahata
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sho Moriguchi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shin Kurose
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Momota
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Natsumi Suzuki
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ayaka Morimoto
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yuka Hoshino
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Morinobu Seki
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ryo Shikimoto
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Yamamoto
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hoshino
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Sato
- Eisai-Keio Innovation Laboratory for Dementia, Human Biology Integration Foundation, Eisai Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Tabuchi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu CH, Lu YH, Lee TH, Tu CY, Fuh JL, Wang YF, Yang BH. Feasibility evaluation of middle-phase 18F-florbetaben positron emission tomography imaging using centiloid quantification and visual assessment. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:4806-4815. [PMID: 37581034 PMCID: PMC10423384 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Background 18F-florbetaben (FBB) positron emission tomography (PET) scan has been widely used in research and routine clinical practice. Most studies used late-phase (scanning from 90 to 110 min after injection) FBB scans to generate beta-amyloid accumulation data. The feasibility of middle-phase scan is seldom discussed. Using the middle-phase data can shorten the patients' waiting between the injection and scan, and hospital can acquire more flexible schedule of routine scan. Methods Paired middle-phase (60-80 min) FBB scans and standard (90-110 min) FBB scans were obtained from 27 subjects (12 neurodegenerative dementia, 8 mild cognitive impairment, 3 normal control, and 4 patients not suffering from neurodegenerative dementia). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated and converted to centiloid (CL) scale to investigate the impact on image quantification. CL pipeline validation were performed to build an equation converting the middle-phase data into equivalent standard scans. Cohen's kappa of binary interpretation and brain amyloid plaque load (BAPL) score were also used to evaluate the intrareader agreement of the FBB image from the two protocols. Results The middle-phase FBB SUVR showed an excellent correlation, which provided a linear regression equation of SUVRFBB60-80 = 0.88 × SUVRFBB90-110 + 0.07, with R2=0.98. The slope of the equation indicated that there was bias between the middle and standard acquisition. This can be converted into the CL scale using CL = 174.68 × SUVR - 166.39. Cohen's kappa of binary interpretation and BAPL score were 1.0 (P<0.0001). Conclusions Our findings indicate that the middle-phase FBB protocol is feasible in clinical applications for scans that are at either end of beta-amyloid spectrum, which provides comparable semiquantitative results to standard scan. Patient's waiting time between the injection and scan can be shortened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Han Wu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei
| | - Yueh-Hsun Lu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei
| | - Tse-Hao Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
| | - Chun-Yuan Tu
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu
- Association of Medical Radiation Technologists, Taipei
| | - Jong-Ling Fuh
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
| | - Yuh-Feng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu
| | - Bang-Hung Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tian M, Zuo C, Civelek AC, Carrio I, Watanabe Y, Kang KW, Murakami K, Garibotto V, Prior JO, Barthel H, Guan Y, Lu J, Zhou R, Jin C, Wu S, Zhang X, Zhong Y, Zhang H. International Nuclear Medicine Consensus on the Clinical Use of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography in Alzheimer's Disease. PHENOMICS (CHAM, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 3:375-389. [PMID: 37589025 PMCID: PMC10425321 DOI: 10.1007/s43657-022-00068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the main cause of dementia, with its diagnosis and management remaining challenging. Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) has become increasingly important in medical practice for patients with AD. To integrate and update previous guidelines in the field, a task group of experts of several disciplines from multiple countries was assembled, and they revised and approved the content related to the application of amyloid PET in the medical settings of cognitively impaired individuals, focusing on clinical scenarios, patient preparation, administered activities, as well as image acquisition, processing, interpretation and reporting. In addition, expert opinions, practices, and protocols of prominent research institutions performing research on amyloid PET of dementia are integrated. With the increasing availability of amyloid PET imaging, a complete and standard pipeline for the entire examination process is essential for clinical practice. This international consensus and practice guideline will help to promote proper clinical use of amyloid PET imaging in patients with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Tian
- PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200235 China
- Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201203 China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Chuantao Zuo
- PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200235 China
- National Center for Neurological Disorders and National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040 China
| | - Ali Cahid Civelek
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, 21287 USA
| | - Ignasi Carrio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025 Spain
| | - Yasuyoshi Watanabe
- Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047 Japan
| | - Keon Wook Kang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080 Korea
| | - Koji Murakami
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8431 Japan
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals of Geneva and NIMTlab, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1205 Switzerland
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, 1011 Switzerland
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, 04103 Germany
| | - Yihui Guan
- PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200235 China
| | - Jiaying Lu
- PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200235 China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Chentao Jin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Shuang Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Xiaohui Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Yan Zhong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009 China
- The College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007 China
- Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007 China
| | - Molecular Imaging-Based Precision Medicine Task Group of A3 (China-Japan-Korea) Foresight Program
- PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200235 China
- Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201203 China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009 China
- National Center for Neurological Disorders and National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040 China
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, 21287 USA
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025 Spain
- Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047 Japan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080 Korea
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8431 Japan
- Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals of Geneva and NIMTlab, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1205 Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, 1011 Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, 04103 Germany
- Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009 China
- The College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007 China
- Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007 China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park SW, Yeo NY, Kim Y, Byeon G, Jang JW. Deep learning application for the classification of Alzheimer's disease using 18F-flortaucipir (AV-1451) tau positron emission tomography. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8096. [PMID: 37208383 PMCID: PMC10198973 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35389-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-flortaucipir can distinguish individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) from cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of 18F-flortaucipir-PET images and multimodal data integration in the differentiation of CU from MCI or AD through DL. We used cross-sectional data (18F-flortaucipir-PET images, demographic and neuropsychological score) from the ADNI. All data for subjects (138 CU, 75 MCI, 63 AD) were acquired at baseline. The 2D convolutional neural network (CNN)-long short-term memory (LSTM) and 3D CNN were conducted. Multimodal learning was conducted by adding the clinical data with imaging data. Transfer learning was performed for classification between CU and MCI. The AUC for AD classification from CU was 0.964 and 0.947 in 2D CNN-LSTM and multimodal learning. The AUC of 3D CNN showed 0.947, and 0.976 in multimodal learning. The AUC for MCI classification from CU had 0.840 and 0.923 in 2D CNN-LSTM and multimodal learning. The AUC of 3D CNN showed 0.845, and 0.850 in multimodal learning. The 18F-flortaucipir PET is effective for the classification of AD stage. Furthermore, the effect of combination images with clinical data increased the performance of AD classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Won Park
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Informatics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Na Young Yeo
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Big Data Medical Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeshin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Gihwan Byeon
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Psychiatry, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Won Jang
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Big Data Medical Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park SW, Yeo NY, Lee J, Lee SH, Byun J, Park DY, Yum S, Kim JK, Byeon G, Kim Y, Jang JW. Machine learning application for classification of Alzheimer's disease stages using 18F-flortaucipir positron emission tomography. Biomed Eng Online 2023; 22:40. [PMID: 37120537 PMCID: PMC10149022 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01107-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The progression of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) can be classified into three stages: cognitive unimpairment (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD. The purpose of this study was to implement a machine learning (ML) framework for AD stage classification using the standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) extracted from 18F-flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) images. We demonstrate the utility of tau SUVR for AD stage classification. We used clinical variables (age, sex, education, mini-mental state examination scores) and SUVR extracted from PET images scanned at baseline. Four types of ML frameworks, such as logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting, and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used and explained by Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to classify the AD stage. RESULTS Of a total of 199 participants, 74, 69, and 56 patients were in the CU, MCI, and AD groups, respectively; their mean age was 71.5 years, and 106 (53.3%) were men. In the classification between CU and AD, the effect of clinical and tau SUVR was high in all classification tasks and all models had a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) > 0.96. In the classification between MCI and AD, the independent effect of tau SUVR in SVM had an AUC of 0.88 (p < 0.05), which was the highest compared to other models. In the classification between MCI and CU, the AUC of each classification model was higher with tau SUVR variables than with clinical variables independently, which yielded an AUC of 0.75(p < 0.05) in MLP, which was the highest. As an explanation by SHAP for the classification between MCI and CU, and AD and CU, the amygdala and entorhinal cortex greatly affected the classification results. In the classification between MCI and AD, the para-hippocampal and temporal cortex affected model performance. Especially entorhinal cortex and amygdala showed a higher effect on model performance than all clinical variables in the classification between MCI and CU. CONCLUSIONS The independent effect of tau deposition indicates that it is an effective biomarker in classifying CU and MCI into clinical stages using MLP. It is also very effective in classifying AD stages using SVM with clinical information that can be easily obtained at clinical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Won Park
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Informatics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Na Young Yeo
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jinsu Lee
- Department of Data Science Research Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Hee Lee
- Department of Statistics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Junghyun Byun
- Department of Healthcare, Radiation Health Institute, Hydro & Nuclear Co., Ltd., Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong Young Park
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Sujin Yum
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jung-Kyeom Kim
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
| | - Gihwan Byeon
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
- Department of Psychiatry, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Yeshin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Jang
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, 156, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, Gangwon, 24289, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
- School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
- Department of Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chun MY, Jang H, Kim HJ, Kim JP, Gallacher J, Allué JA, Sarasa L, Castillo S, Pascual-Lucas M, Na DL, Seo SW. Contribution of clinical information to the predictive performance of plasma β-amyloid levels for amyloid positron emission tomography positivity. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15:1126799. [PMID: 36998318 PMCID: PMC10044013 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1126799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundEarly detection of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation, a major biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), has become important. As fluid biomarkers, the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ for predicting Aβ deposition on positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied, and the development of plasma Aβ is beginning to receive increased attention recently. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether APOE genotypes, age, and cognitive status increase the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ levels for Aβ PET positivity.MethodsWe recruited 488 participants who underwent both plasma Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 1) and 217 participants who underwent both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 2). Plasma and CSF samples were analyzed using ABtest-MS, an antibody-free liquid chromatography-differential mobility spectrometry-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method and INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, respectively. To evaluate the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ, respectively, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.ResultsWhen predicting Aβ PET status, both plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and CSF Aβ42 showed high accuracy (plasma Aβ area under the curve (AUC) 0.814; CSF Aβ AUC 0.848). In the plasma Aβ models, the AUC values were higher than plasma Aβ alone model, when the models were combined with either cognitive stage (p < 0.001) or APOE genotype (p = 0.011). On the other hand, there was no difference between the CSF Aβ models, when these variables were added.ConclusionPlasma Aβ might be a useful predictor of Aβ deposition on PET status as much as CSF Aβ, particularly when considered with clinical information such as APOE genotype and cognitive stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Young Chun
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyemin Jang
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hyemin Jang, ; Sang Won Seo,
| | - Hee Jin Kim
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Pyo Kim
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Center for Neuroimaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - John Gallacher
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Duk L. Na
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Won Seo
- Departments of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hyemin Jang, ; Sang Won Seo,
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Quantitative comparative analysis of amyloid PET images using three radiopharmaceuticals. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:271-279. [PMID: 36749463 PMCID: PMC10129914 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01824-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 florbetaben (FBB), F-18 flutemetamol (FMM), and F-18 florapronol (FPN) is being used clinically for the evaluation of dementia. These radiopharmaceuticals are commonly used to evaluate the accumulation of beta-amyloid plaques in the brain, but there are structural differences between them. We investigated whether there are any differences in the imaging characteristics. METHODS A total of 605 subjects were enrolled retrospectively in this study, including healthy subjects (HS) and patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Participants underwent amyloid PET imaging using one of the three radiopharmaceuticals. The PET images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively using a standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). In addition, we calculated and compared the cut-off SUVR of the representative regions for each radiopharmaceutical that can distinguish between positive and negative scans. RESULTS In the negative images of the HS group, the contrast between the white matter and the gray matter was high in the FMM PET images, while striatal uptake was relatively higher in the FPN PET images. The SUVR showed significant differences across the radiopharmaceuticals in all areas except the temporal lobe, but the range of differences was relatively small. Accuracy levels for the global cut-off SUVR to discriminate between positive and negative images were highest in FMM PET, with a value of 0.989. FBB PET also showed a high value of 0.978, while FPN PET showed a relatively low value of 0.901. CONCLUSIONS Negative amyloid PET images using the three radiopharmaceuticals showed visually and quantitatively similar imaging characteristics except in the striatum. Binary classification using the cut-off of the global cortex showed high accuracy overall, although there were some differences between the three PET images.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim J, Choe YS, Park Y, Kim Y, Kim JP, Jang H, Kim HJ, Na DL, Cho SJ, Moon SH, Seo SW. Clinical outcomes of increased focal amyloid uptake in individuals with subthreshold global amyloid levels. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15:1124445. [PMID: 36936497 PMCID: PMC10017468 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1124445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) method is objective and simple, cut-off optimization using global SUVR values may not reflect focal increased uptake in the cerebrum. The present study investigated clinical and neuroimaging characteristics according to focally increased β-amyloid (Aβ) uptake and global Aβ status. Methods We recruited 968 participants with cognitive continuum. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests and 498 18F-florbetaben (FBB) amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and 470 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) PET. Each PET scan was assessed in 10 regions (left and right frontal, lateral temporal, parietal, cingulate, and striatum) with focal-quantitative SUVR-based cutoff values for each region by using an iterative outlier approach. Results A total of 62 (6.4%) subjects showed increased focal Aβ uptake with subthreshold global Aβ status [global (-) and focal (+) Aβ group, G(-)F(+) group]. The G(-)F(+) group showed worse performance in memory impairment (p < 0.001), global cognition (p = 0.009), greater hippocampal atrophy (p = 0.045), compared to those in the G(-)F(-). Participants with widespread Aβ involvement in the whole region [G(+)] showed worse neuropsychological (p < 0.001) and neuroimaging features (p < 0.001) than those with focal Aβ involvement G(-)F(+). Conclusion Our findings suggest that individuals show distinctive clinical outcomes according to focally increased Aβ uptake and global Aβ status. Thus, researchers and clinicians should pay more attention to focal increased Aβ uptake in addition to global Aβ status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeho Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeong Sim Choe
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuhyun Park
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeshin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Pyo Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Hyemin Jang
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Jin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Duk L. Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Medical Center, Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Moon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Seung Hwan Moon,
| | - Sang Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Sang Won Seo,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brier MR, Blazey T, Raichle ME, Morris JC, Benzinger TLS, Vlassenko AG, Snyder AZ, Goyal MS. Increased white matter glycolysis in humans with cerebral small vessel disease. NATURE AGING 2022; 2:991-999. [PMID: 37118084 PMCID: PMC10155263 DOI: 10.1038/s43587-022-00303-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
White matter lesions in cerebral small vessel disease are related to ischemic injury and increase the risk of stroke and cognitive decline. Pathological changes due to cerebral small vessel disease are increasingly recognized outside of discrete lesions, but the metabolic alterations in nonlesional tissue has not been described. Aerobic glycolysis is critical to white matter myelin homeostasis and repair. In this study, we examined cerebral metabolism of glucose and oxygen as well as blood flow in individuals with and without cerebral small vessel disease using multitracer positron emission tomography. We show that glycolysis is relatively elevated in nonlesional white matter in individuals with small vessel disease relative to healthy, age-matched controls. On the other hand, in young healthy individuals, glycolysis is relatively low in areas of white matter susceptible to lesion formation. These results suggest that increased white matter glycolysis is a marker of pathology associated with small vessel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Brier
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Tyler Blazey
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Marcus E Raichle
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrei G Vlassenko
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Abraham Z Snyder
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Manu S Goyal
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pemberton HG, Collij LE, Heeman F, Bollack A, Shekari M, Salvadó G, Alves IL, Garcia DV, Battle M, Buckley C, Stephens AW, Bullich S, Garibotto V, Barkhof F, Gispert JD, Farrar G. Quantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3508-3528. [PMID: 35389071 PMCID: PMC9308604 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05784-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is one of the earliest detectable brain changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. The overall load and spatial distribution of brain Aβ can be determined in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET), for which three fluorine-18 labelled radiotracers have been approved for clinical use. In clinical practice, trained readers will categorise scans as either Aβ positive or negative, based on visual inspection. Diagnostic decisions are often based on these reads and patient selection for clinical trials is increasingly guided by amyloid status. However, tracer deposition in the grey matter as a function of amyloid load is an inherently continuous process, which is not sufficiently appreciated through binary cut-offs alone. State-of-the-art methods for amyloid PET quantification can generate tracer-independent measures of Aβ burden. Recent research has shown the ability of these quantitative measures to highlight pathological changes at the earliest stages of the AD continuum and generate more sensitive thresholds, as well as improving diagnostic confidence around established binary cut-offs. With the recent FDA approval of aducanumab and more candidate drugs on the horizon, early identification of amyloid burden using quantitative measures is critical for enrolling appropriate subjects to help establish the optimal window for therapeutic intervention and secondary prevention. In addition, quantitative amyloid measurements are used for treatment response monitoring in clinical trials. In clinical settings, large multi-centre studies have shown that amyloid PET results change both diagnosis and patient management and that quantification can accurately predict rates of cognitive decline. Whether these changes in management reflect an improvement in clinical outcomes is yet to be determined and further validation work is required to establish the utility of quantification for supporting treatment endpoint decisions. In this state-of-the-art review, several tools and measures available for amyloid PET quantification are summarised and discussed. Use of these methods is growing both clinically and in the research domain. Concurrently, there is a duty of care to the wider dementia community to increase visibility and understanding of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh G Pemberton
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK.
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Vallez Garcia
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Battle
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim HJ, Oh JS, Lim JS, Lee S, Jo S, Chung EN, Shim WH, Oh M, Kim JS, Roh JH, Lee JH. The impact of subthreshold levels of amyloid deposition on conversion to dementia in patients with amyloid-negative amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:93. [PMID: 35821150 PMCID: PMC9277922 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01035-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 40-50% of patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are found to have no significant Alzheimer's pathology based on amyloid PET positivity. Notably, conversion to dementia in this population is known to occur much less often than in amyloid-positive MCI. However, the relationship between MCI and brain amyloid deposition remains largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the influence of subthreshold levels of amyloid deposition on conversion to dementia in amnestic MCI patients with negative amyloid PET scans. METHODS This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients with amyloid-negative amnestic MCI who visited the memory clinic of Asan Medical Center. All participants underwent detailed neuropsychological testing, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and [18F]-florbetaben (FBB) positron emission tomography scan (PET). Conversion to dementia was determined by a neurologist based on a clinical interview with a detailed neuropsychological test or a decline in the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination score of more than 4 points per year combined with impaired activities of daily living. Regional cortical amyloid levels were calculated, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for conversion to dementia was obtained. To increase the reliability of the results of the study, we analyzed the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset together. RESULTS During the follow-up period, 36% (39/107) of patients converted to dementia from amnestic MCI. The dementia converter group displayed increased standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values of FBB on PET in the bilateral temporal, parietal, posterior cingulate, occipital, and left precuneus cortices as well as increased global SUVR. Among volume of interests, the left parietal SUVR predicted conversion to dementia with the highest accuracy in the ROC analysis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762, P < 0.001). The combination of precuneus, parietal cortex, and FBB composite SUVRs also showed a higher accuracy in predicting conversion to dementia than other models (AUC = 0.763). Of the results of ADNI data, the SUVR of the left precuneus SUVR showed the highest AUC (AUC = 0.596, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that subthreshold amyloid levels may contribute to conversion to dementia in patients with amyloid-negative amnestic MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung-Ji Kim
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, South Korea
| | - Jungsu S Oh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Sung Lim
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sunju Lee
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sungyang Jo
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - E-Nae Chung
- Health Innovation Bigdata Center, Asan Institute for Lifesciences, Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woo-Hyun Shim
- Health Innovation Bigdata Center, Asan Institute for Lifesciences, Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
- Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Minyoung Oh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Seung Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Hoon Roh
- Neuroscience Institute, Korea University College of Medicine and School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Hong Lee
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pomilio AB, Vitale AA, Lazarowski AJ. Neuroproteomics Chip-Based Mass Spectrometry and Other Techniques for Alzheimer´S Disease Biomarkers – Update. Curr Pharm Des 2022; 28:1124-1151. [DOI: 10.2174/1381612828666220413094918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of growing interest given that there is cognitive damage and symptom onset acceleration. Therefore, it is important to find AD biomarkers for early diagnosis, disease progression, and discrimination of AD and other diseases.
Objective:
To update the relevance of mass spectrometry for the identification of peptides and proteins involved in AD useful as discriminating biomarkers.
Methods:
Proteomics and peptidomics technologies that show the highest possible specificity and selectivity for AD biomarkers are analyzed, together with the biological fluids used. In addition to positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is widely used to identify proteins and peptides involved in AD. The use of protein chips in SELDI technology and electroblotting chips for peptides makes feasible small amounts (L) of samples for analysis.
Results:
Suitable biomarkers are related to AD pathology, such as intracellular neurofibrillary tangles; extraneuronal senile plaques; neuronal and axonal degeneration; inflammation and oxidative stress. Recently, peptides were added to the candidate list, which are not amyloid-b or tau fragments, but are related to coagulation, brain plasticity, and complement/neuroinflammation systems involving the neurovascular unit.
Conclusion:
The progress made in the application of mass spectrometry and recent chip techniques is promising for discriminating between AD, mild cognitive impairment, and matched healthy controls. The application of this technique to blood samples from patients with AD has shown to be less invasive and fast enough to determine the diagnosis, stage of the disease, prognosis, and follow-up of the therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia B. Pomilio
- Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Área Hematología, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. Córdoba 2351, C1120AAF Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Arturo A. Vitale
- Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Área Hematología, Hospital de Clínicas “José de San Martín”, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. Córdoba 2351, C1120AAF Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alberto J. Lazarowski
- Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Instituto de Fisiopatología y Bioquímica Clínica (INFIBIOC), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Córdoba 2351, C1120AAF Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harmonisation of PET imaging features with different amyloid ligands using machine learning-based classifier. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:321-330. [PMID: 34328533 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05499-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we used machine learning to develop a new method derived from a ligand-independent amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) classifier to harmonise different Aβ ligands. METHODS We obtained 107 paired 18F-florbetaben (FBB) and 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) PET images at the Samsung Medical Centre. To apply the method to FMM ligand, we transferred the previously developed FBB PET classifier to test similar features from the FMM PET images for application to FMM, which in turn developed a ligand-independent Aβ PET classifier. We explored the concordance rates of our classifier in detecting cortical and striatal Aβ positivity. We investigated the correlation of machine learning-based cortical tracer uptake (ML-CTU) values quantified by the classifier between FBB and FMM. RESULTS This classifier achieved high classification accuracy (area under the curve = 0.958) even with different Aβ PET ligands. In addition, the concordance rate of FBB and FMM using the classifier (87.5%) was good to excellent, which seemed to be higher than that in visual assessment (82.7%) and lower than that in standardised uptake value ratio cut-off categorisation (93.3%). FBB and FMM ML-CTU values were highly correlated with each other (R = 0.903). CONCLUSION Our findings suggested that our novel classifier may harmonise FBB and FMM ligands in the clinical setting which in turn facilitate the biomarker-guided diagnosis and trials of anti-Aβ treatment in the research field.
Collapse
|
20
|
Berron D, Vogel JW, Insel PS, Pereira JB, Xie L, Wisse LEM, Yushkevich PA, Palmqvist S, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Stomrud E, Smith R, Strandberg O, Hansson O. Early stages of tau pathology and its associations with functional connectivity, atrophy and memory. Brain 2021; 144:2771-2783. [PMID: 33725124 PMCID: PMC8557349 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In Alzheimer's disease, postmortem studies have shown that the first cortical site where neurofibrillary tangles appear is the transentorhinal region, a subregion within the medial temporal lobe that largely overlaps with area 35, and the entorhinal cortex. Here we used tau-PET imaging to investigate the sequence of tau pathology progression within the human medial temporal lobe and across regions in the posterior-medial system. Our objective was to study how medial temporal tau is related to functional connectivity, regional atrophy, and memory performance. We included 215 β-amyloid negative cognitively unimpaired, 81 β-amyloid positive cognitively unimpaired and 87 β-amyloid positive individuals with mild cognitive impairment, who each underwent [18]F-RO948 tau and [18]F-flutemetamol amyloid PET imaging, structural T1-MRI and memory assessments as part of the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study. First, event-based modelling revealed that the entorhinal cortex and area 35 show the earliest signs of tau accumulation followed by the anterior and posterior hippocampus, area 36 and the parahippocampal cortex. In later stages, tau accumulation became abnormal in neocortical temporal and finally parietal brain regions. Second, in cognitively unimpaired individuals, increased tau load was related to local atrophy in the entorhinal cortex, area 35 and the anterior hippocampus and tau load in several anterior medial temporal lobe subregions was associated with distant atrophy of the posterior hippocampus. Tau load, but not atrophy, in these regions was associated with lower memory performance. Further, tau-related reductions in functional connectivity in critical networks between the medial temporal lobe and regions in the posterior-medial system were associated with this early memory impairment. Finally, in patients with mild cognitive impairment, the association of tau load in the hippocampus with memory performance was partially mediated by posterior hippocampal atrophy. In summary, our findings highlight the progression of tau pathology across medial temporal lobe subregions and its disease-stage specific association with memory performance. While tau pathology might affect memory performance in cognitively unimpaired individuals via reduced functional connectivity in critical medial temporal lobe-cortical networks, memory impairment in mild cognitively impaired patients is associated with posterior hippocampal atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Berron
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Jacob W Vogel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 19104 Philadelphia, USA
| | - Philip S Insel
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, 94143 San Francisco, USA
| | - Joana B Pereira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Long Xie
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory (PICSL), University of Pennsylvania, 19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 19104 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura E M Wisse
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory (PICSL), University of Pennsylvania, 19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 19104 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul A Yushkevich
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory (PICSL), University of Pennsylvania, 19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 19104 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 19104 Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Vries BM, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Schuit RC, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Windhorst AD, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [ 18F]Flortaucipir and [ 18F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:550-559. [PMID: 33443720 PMCID: PMC8277631 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement studies. Once a reference region is validated, the use should be verified for each new subject. This verification normally requires volume of distribution (VT) of a reference region. However, performing dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not always possible, specifically in elderly subjects and in advanced disease stages. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of non-invasive standardised uptake value (SUV) approaches, in comparison to VT, as a verification of the previously validated grey matter cerebellum reference region for [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls. Procedures Dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET scans obtained from nineteen subjects (10 AD patients) and 90-min [18F]florbetapir dynamic scans obtained from fourteen subjects (8 AD patients) were included. Regional VT’s were estimated for both tracers and were considered the standard verification of the previously validated reference region. Non-invasive SUVs corrected for body weight (SUVBW), lean body mass (SUL), and body surface area (SUVBSA) were obtained by using later time intervals of the dynamic scans. Simulations were also performed to assess the effect of flow and specific binding (BPND) on the SUVs. Results A low SUV corresponded well with a low VT for both [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir. Simulation confirmed that SUVs were only slightly affected by flow changes and that increases in SUV were predominantly determined by the presence of specific binding. Conclusions In situations where dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not possible, a low SUV(80–100 min) for [18F]flortaucipir and a low SUV(50–70 min) for [18F]florbetapir may be used as indication for absence of specific binding in the grey matter cerebellum reference region. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M de Vries
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cho SH, Choe YS, Kim YJ, Lee B, Kim HJ, Jang H, Kim JP, Jung YH, Kim SJ, Kim BC, Farrar G, Na DL, Moon SH, Seo SW. Concordance in detecting amyloid positivity between 18F-florbetaben and 18F-flutemetamol amyloid PET using quantitative and qualitative assessments. Sci Rep 2020; 10:19576. [PMID: 33177593 PMCID: PMC7658982 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76102-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess whether there is a discrepancy in detecting amyloid beta (Aβ) positivity between 18F-florbetaben (FBB) and 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) positron emission tomography (PET). We obtained paired FBB and FMM PET images from 107 participants. Three experts visually quantified the Aβ deposition as positive or negative. Quantitative assessment was performed using global cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) with the whole cerebellum as the reference region. Inter-rater agreement was excellent for FBB and FMM. The concordance rates between FBB and FMM were 94.4% (101/107) for visual assessment and 98.1% (105/107) for SUVR cut-off categorization. Both FBB and FMM showed high agreement rates between visual assessment and SUVR positive or negative categorization (93.5% in FBB and 91.2% in FMM). When the two ligands were compared based on SUVR cut-off categorization as standard of truth, although not statistically significant, the false-positive rate was higher in FMM (9.1%) than in FBB (1.8%) (p = 0.13). Our findings suggested that both FBB and FMM had excellent agreement when used to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate Aβ deposits, thus, combining amyloid PET data associated with the use of different ligands from multi-centers is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Hyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Yeong Sim Choe
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ju Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byungju Lee
- Department of Neurology, Yuseong Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Pohang, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyemin Jang
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Pyo Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hee Jung
- Department of Neurology, Myoungji Hospital, Hanyang University, Goyangsi, Korea
| | - Soo-Jong Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byeong C Kim
- Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Gill Farrar
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.,Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Moon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sang Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea. .,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. .,Samsung Alzheimer Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. .,Department of Intelligent Precision Healthcare Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|