1
|
Guan D, Bai Z, Zhu X, Zhong C, Hou Y, Zhu D, Li H, Lan F, Diao S, Yao Y, Zhao B, Li X, Pan Z, Gao Y, Wang Y, Zou D, Wang R, Xu T, Sun C, Yin H, Teng J, Xu Z, Lin Q, Shi S, Shao D, Degalez F, Lagarrigue S, Wang Y, Wang M, Peng M, Rocha D, Charles M, Smith J, Watson K, Buitenhuis AJ, Sahana G, Lund MS, Warren W, Frantz L, Larson G, Lamont SJ, Si W, Zhao X, Li B, Zhang H, Luo C, Shu D, Qu H, Luo W, Li Z, Nie Q, Zhang X, Xiang R, Liu S, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Liu GE, Cheng H, Yang N, Hu X, Zhou H, Fang L. Genetic regulation of gene expression across multiple tissues in chickens. Nat Genet 2025:10.1038/s41588-025-02155-9. [PMID: 40200121 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-025-02155-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
The chicken is a valuable model for understanding fundamental biology and vertebrate evolution and is a major global source of nutrient-dense and lean protein. Despite being the first non-mammalian amniote to have its genome sequenced, a systematic characterization of functional variation on the chicken genome remains lacking. Here, we integrated bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from 7,015 samples, single-cell RNA-seq data from 127,598 cells and 2,869 whole-genome sequences to present a pilot atlas of regulatory variants across 28 chicken tissues. This atlas reveals millions of regulatory effects on primary expression (protein-coding genes, long non-coding RNA and exons) and post-transcriptional modifications (alternative splicing and 3'-untranslated region alternative polyadenylation). We highlighted distinct molecular mechanisms underlying these regulatory variants, their context-dependent behavior and their utility in interpreting genome-wide associations for 39 chicken complex traits. Finally, our comparative analyses of gene regulation between chickens and mammals demonstrate how this resource can facilitate cross-species gene mapping of complex traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Zhonghao Bai
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Xiaoning Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Conghao Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Yali Hou
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Di Zhu
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Houcheng Li
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Fangren Lan
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuqi Diao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuelin Yao
- MRC Human Genetics Unit at the Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bingru Zhao
- Jiangsu Livestock Embryo Engineering Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaochang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangyuan Pan
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yahui Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Yuzhe Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Zou
- Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China
| | - Ruizhen Wang
- Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyi Xu
- Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China
| | - Congjiao Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongwei Yin
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinyan Teng
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiting Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shourong Shi
- Poultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou, China
| | - Dan Shao
- Poultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou, China
| | | | | | - Ying Wang
- Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Mingshan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution & Animal Models and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Minsheng Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Evolution & Animal Models and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
| | - Dominique Rocha
- INRAE, GABI, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Mathieu Charles
- INRAE, GABI, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Jacqueline Smith
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Kellie Watson
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | | | - Goutam Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mogens Sandø Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wesley Warren
- Department of Animal Sciences, Data Science and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Laurent Frantz
- Palaeogenomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Greger Larson
- The Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan J Lamont
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Wei Si
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bingjie Li
- Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Roslin Institute Building, Midlothian, UK
| | - Haihan Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
| | - Chenglong Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dingming Shu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Qu
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenhui Li
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qinghua Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiquan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruidong Xiang
- Agriculture Victoria, Agribio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Cambridge-Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shuli Liu
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhang Zhang
- Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Hans Cheng
- Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, USNPRC, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Ning Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontier Science Center of Molecular Design Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics (QGG), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li P, Yang Y, Ning B, Tian Y, Wang L, Zeng W, Lu H, Zhang T. Transcriptome analysis of multiple tissues and identification of tissue-specific genes in Lueyang black-bone chicken. Poult Sci 2025; 104:104986. [PMID: 40068570 PMCID: PMC11932687 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2025] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Systematically constructing a gene expression atlas of poultry tissues is critically important for advancing poultry research and production. In this study, the gene expression profiles of 9 major tissues of Lueyang black-bone chicken were successfully constructed by transcriptome sequencing technology. Through in-depth analysis of transcriptome data, a total of 10 housekeeping genes (HKGs) and 87 marker genes (MGs) were identified. Furthermore, by applying weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), we delineated nine tissue-specific modules and 90 hub genes, offering novel insights into the regulatory networks underlying tissue-specific gene expression. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that HKGs were predominantly involved in maintaining fundamental cellular functions, with significant enrichment in pathways related to oxidative phosphorylation, cell cycle regulation, and DNA replication. MGs were closely associated with tissue-specific physiological functions, providing valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms governing tissue functionality. Notably, through multidimensional validation, EEF1A1 and FTH1 were confirmed to exhibit cross-tissue expression stability, establishing them as ideal reference genes for multi-tissue qPCR experiments in chickens. Additionally, we successfully identified tissue marker genes, including TNNT2, PIT54, SFTPC, and PGM1, which are specific to the heart, liver, lung, and breast muscle, respectively. The results of this study have important scientific value in expanding reference gene selection and elucidating tissue-specific molecular mechanisms, and provide solid theoretical support and technical guidance for poultry breeding improvement and production practice optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pan Li
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Yufei Yang
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Bo Ning
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Yingmin Tian
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Ling Wang
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Engineering Research Center of quality improvement and safety control of Qinba special meat products, 723001 Hanzhong, China; QinLing-Bashan Mountains Bioresources Comprehensive Development C. I. C, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Qinba State Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecological Environment, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Wenxian Zeng
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Engineering Research Center of quality improvement and safety control of Qinba special meat products, 723001 Hanzhong, China; QinLing-Bashan Mountains Bioresources Comprehensive Development C. I. C, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Qinba State Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecological Environment, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Hongzhao Lu
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Engineering Research Center of quality improvement and safety control of Qinba special meat products, 723001 Hanzhong, China; QinLing-Bashan Mountains Bioresources Comprehensive Development C. I. C, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Qinba State Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecological Environment, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| | - Tao Zhang
- School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Engineering Research Center of quality improvement and safety control of Qinba special meat products, 723001 Hanzhong, China; QinLing-Bashan Mountains Bioresources Comprehensive Development C. I. C, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China; Qinba State Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Ecological Environment, Shaanxi University of Technology, 723001 Hanzhong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou H, Clark E, Guan D, Lagarrigue S, Fang L, Cheng H, Tuggle CK, Kapoor M, Wang Y, Giuffra E, Egidy G. Comparative Genomics and Epigenomics of Transcriptional Regulation. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2025; 13:73-98. [PMID: 39565835 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-111523-102217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
Transcriptional regulation in response to diverse physiological cues involves complicated biological processes. Recent initiatives that leverage whole genome sequencing and annotation of regulatory elements significantly contribute to our understanding of transcriptional gene regulation. Advances in the data sets available for comparative genomics and epigenomics can identify evolutionarily constrained regulatory variants and shed light on noncoding elements that influence transcription in different tissues and developmental stages across species. Most epigenomic data, however, are generated from healthy subjects at specific developmental stages. To bridge the genotype-phenotype gap, future research should focus on generating multidimensional epigenomic data under diverse physiological conditions. Farm animal species offer advantages in terms of feasibility, cost, and experimental design for such integrative analyses in comparison to humans. Deep learning modeling and cutting-edge technologies in sequencing and functional screening and validation also provide great promise for better understanding transcriptional regulation in this dynamic field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | - Emily Clark
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom;
| | - Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Lingzhao Fang
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Muskan Kapoor
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA; ,
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA; , , ,
| | | | - Giorgia Egidy
- GABI, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Jouy-en-Josas, France; ,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muthusamy M, Ramasamy KT, Peters SO, Palani S, Gowthaman V, Nagarajan M, Karuppusamy S, Thangavelu V, Aranganoor Kannan T. Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Altered Expression of Genes Involved in Metabolic and Immune Processes in NDV-Infected Chicken Embryos. Metabolites 2024; 14:669. [PMID: 39728450 DOI: 10.3390/metabo14120669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The poultry industry is significantly impacted by viral infections, particularly Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV), which leads to substantial economic losses. It is essential to comprehend how the sequence of development affects biological pathways and how early exposure to infections might affect immune responses. METHODS This study employed transcriptome analysis to investigate host-pathogen interactions by analyzing gene expression changes in NDV-infected chicken embryos' lungs. RESULT RNA-Seq reads were aligned with the chicken reference genome (Galgal7), revealing 594 differentially expressed genes: 264 upregulated and 330 downregulated. The most overexpressed genes, with logFC between 8.15 and 8.75, included C8A, FGG, PIT54, FETUB, APOC3, and FGA. Notably, downregulated genes included BPIFB3 (-4.46 logFC) and TRIM39.1 (-4.26 logFC). The analysis also identified 29 novel transcripts and 20 lncRNAs that were upregulated. Gene Ontology and KEGG pathways' analyses revealed significant alterations in gene expression related to immune function, metabolism, cell cycle, nucleic acid processes, and mitochondrial activity due to NDV infection. Key metabolic genes, such as ALDOB (3.27 logFC), PRPS2 (2.66 logFC), and XDH (2.15 logFC), exhibited altered expression patterns, while DCK2 (-1.99 logFC) and TK1 (-2.11 logFC) were also affected. Several immune-related genes showed significant upregulation in infected lung samples, including ALB (6.15 logFC), TLR4 (1.86 logFC), TLR2 (2.79 logFC), and interleukin receptors, such as IL1R2 (3.15 logFC) and IL22RA2 (1.37 logFC). Conversely, genes such as CXCR4 (-1.49 logFC), CXCL14 (-2.57 logFC), GATA3 (-1.51 logFC), and IL17REL (-2.93 logFC) were downregulated. The higher expression of HSP genes underscores their vital role in immune responses. CONCLUSION Comprehension of these genes' interactions is essential for regulating viral replication and immune responses during infections, potentially aiding in the identification of candidate genes for poultry breed improvement amidst NDV challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malarmathi Muthusamy
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Namakkal 637002, India
| | - Kannaki T Ramasamy
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Directorate of Poultry Research, Hyderabad 500030, India
| | | | - Srinivasan Palani
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Namakkal 637002, India
| | - Vasudevan Gowthaman
- Poultry Disease Diagnosis and Surveillance Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Namakkal 637002, India
| | - Murali Nagarajan
- Alambadi Cattle Breed Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Dharmapuri 635111, India
| | - Sivakumar Karuppusamy
- Faculty of Food and Agriculture, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 999183, Trinidad and Tobago
| | | | - Thiruvenkadan Aranganoor Kannan
- Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Namakkal 637002, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krasikova A, Kulikova T, Schelkunov M, Makarova N, Fedotova A, Plotnikov V, Berngardt V, Maslova A, Fedorov A. The first chicken oocyte nucleus whole transcriptomic profile defines the spectrum of maternal mRNA and non-coding RNA genes transcribed by the lampbrush chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:12850-12877. [PMID: 39494543 PMCID: PMC11602149 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Lampbrush chromosomes, with their unusually high rate of nascent RNA synthesis, provide a valuable model for studying mechanisms of global transcriptome up-regulation. Here, we obtained a whole-genomic profile of transcription along the entire length of all lampbrush chromosomes in the chicken karyotype. With nuclear RNA-seq, we obtained information about a wider set of transcripts, including long non-coding RNAs retained in the nucleus and stable intronic sequence RNAs. For a number of protein-coding genes, we visualized their nascent transcripts on the lateral loops of lampbrush chromosomes by RNA-FISH. The set of genes transcribed on the lampbrush chromosomes is required for basic cellular processes and is characterized by a broad expression pattern. We also present the first high-throughput transcriptome characterization of miRNAs and piRNAs in chicken oocytes at the lampbrush chromosome stage. Major targets of predicted piRNAs include CR1 and long terminal repeat (LTR) containing retrotransposable elements. Transcription of tandem repeat arrays was demonstrated by alignment against the whole telomere-to-telomere chromosome assemblies. We show that transcription of telomere-derived RNAs is initiated at adjacent LTR elements. We conclude that hypertranscription on the lateral loops of giant lampbrush chromosomes is required for synthesizing large amounts of transferred to the embryo maternal RNA for thousands of genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alla Krasikova
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| | - Tatiana Kulikova
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| | - Mikhail Schelkunov
- Genomics Core Facility, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia
- Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, 127051, Russia
| | - Nadezhda Makarova
- Genomics Core Facility, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia
| | - Anna Fedotova
- Genomics Core Facility, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 121205, Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Vladimir Plotnikov
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| | - Valeria Berngardt
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| | - Antonina Maslova
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| | - Anton Fedorov
- Laboratory of Cell Nucleus Structure and Dynamics, Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen S, Jiang J, Liang W, Tang Y, Lyu R, Hu Y, Cai D, Luo X, Sun M. Comprehensive Annotation and Expression Profiling of C2H2 Zinc Finger Transcription Factors across Chicken Tissues. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10525. [PMID: 39408854 PMCID: PMC11476951 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
As the most abundant class of transcription factors in eukaryotes, C2H2-type zinc finger proteins (C2H2-ZFPs) play critical roles in various biological processes. Despite being extensively studied in mammals, C2H2-ZFPs remain poorly characterized in birds. Recent accumulation of multi-omics data for chicken enables the genome-wide investigation of C2H2-ZFPs in birds. The purpose of this study is to reveal the genomic occurrence and evolutionary signature of chicken C2H2-ZFPs, and further depict their expression profiles across diverse chicken tissues. Here, we annotated 301 C2H2-ZFPs in chicken genome, which are associated with different effector domains, including KRAB, BTB, HOMEO, PHD, SCAN, and SET. Among them, most KRAB-ZFPs lack orthologues in mammals and tend to form clusters by duplication, supporting their fast evolution in chicken. We also annotated a unique and previously unidentified SCAN-ZFP, which is lineage-specific and highly expressed in ovary and testis. By integrating 101 RNA-seq datasets for 32 tissues, we found that most C2H2-ZFPs have tissue-specific expression. Particularly, 74 C2H2-ZFPs-including 27 KRAB-ZFPs-show blastoderm-enriched expression, indicating their association with early embryo development. Overall, this study performs comprehensive annotation and expression profiling of C2H2 ZFPs in diverse chicken tissues, which gives new insights into the evolution and potential function of C2H2-ZFPs in avian species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Chen
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Jiayao Jiang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Wenxiu Liang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Yuchen Tang
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Renzhe Lyu
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Yun Hu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Demin Cai
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Xugang Luo
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (Y.H.); (D.C.)
| | - Mingan Sun
- Institute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; (S.C.); (J.J.); (W.L.); (Y.T.); (R.L.)
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Degalez F, Bardou P, Lagarrigue S. GEGA (Gallus Enriched Gene Annotation): an online tool providing genomics and functional information across 47 tissues for a chicken gene-enriched atlas gathering Ensembl and Refseq genome annotations. NAR Genom Bioinform 2024; 6:lqae101. [PMID: 39157583 PMCID: PMC11327871 DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqae101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
GEGA is a user-friendly tool designed to navigate through various genomic and functional information related to an enriched gene atlas in chicken that integrates the gene catalogues from the two reference databases, NCBI-RefSeq and EMBL-Ensembl/GENCODE, along with four additional rich resources such as FAANG and NONCODE. Using the latest GRCg7b genome assembly, GEGA encompasses a total of 78 323 genes, including 24 102 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and 44 428 long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), significantly increasing the number of genes provided by each resource independently. However, GEGA is more than just a gene database. It offers a range of features that allow us to go deeper into the functional aspects of these genes. Users can explore gene expression and co-expression profiles across 47 tissues from 36 datasets and 1400 samples, discover tissue-specific variations and their expression as a function of sex or age and extract orthologous genes or their genomic configuration relative to the closest gene. For the communities interested in a specific gene, a list of genes or a quantitative trait locus region in chicken, GEGA's user-friendly interface facilitates efficient gene analysis, easy downloading of results and a multitude of graphical representations, from genomic information to detailed visualization of expression levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Degalez
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
| | - Philippe Bardou
- Sigenae, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Degalez F, Charles M, Foissac S, Zhou H, Guan D, Fang L, Klopp C, Allain C, Lagoutte L, Lecerf F, Acloque H, Giuffra E, Pitel F, Lagarrigue S. Enriched atlas of lncRNA and protein-coding genes for the GRCg7b chicken assembly and its functional annotation across 47 tissues. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6588. [PMID: 38504112 PMCID: PMC10951430 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56705-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Gene atlases for livestock are steadily improving thanks to new genome assemblies and new expression data improving the gene annotation. However, gene content varies across databases due to differences in RNA sequencing data and bioinformatics pipelines, especially for long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) which have higher tissue and developmental specificity and are harder to consistently identify compared to protein coding genes (PCGs). As done previously in 2020 for chicken assemblies galgal5 and GRCg6a, we provide a new gene atlas, lncRNA-enriched, for the latest GRCg7b chicken assembly, integrating "NCBI RefSeq", "EMBL-EBI Ensembl/GENCODE" reference annotations and other resources such as FAANG and NONCODE. As a result, the number of PCGs increases from 18,022 (RefSeq) and 17,007 (Ensembl) to 24,102, and that of lncRNAs from 5789 (RefSeq) and 11,944 (Ensembl) to 44,428. Using 1400 public RNA-seq transcriptome representing 47 tissues, we provided expression evidence for 35,257 (79%) lncRNAs and 22,468 (93%) PCGs, supporting the relevance of this atlas. Further characterization including tissue-specificity, sex-differential expression and gene configurations are provided. We also identified conserved miRNA-hosting genes with human counterparts, suggesting common function. The annotated atlas is available at gega.sigenae.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Degalez
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France
| | - Mathieu Charles
- INRAE, BioinfOmics, GenoToul Bioinformatics facility, Sigenae, Université Fédérale de Toulouse, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Paris-Saclay University, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Sylvain Foissac
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | | | - Dailu Guan
- University of California Davis, Davis, USA
| | | | - Christophe Klopp
- INRAE, BioinfOmics, GenoToul Bioinformatics facility, Sigenae, Université Fédérale de Toulouse, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Coralie Allain
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France
| | | | | | - Hervé Acloque
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Paris-Saclay University, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Paris-Saclay University, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Frédérique Pitel
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kurylo C, Guyomar C, Foissac S, Djebali S. TAGADA: a scalable pipeline to improve genome annotations with RNA-seq data. NAR Genom Bioinform 2023; 5:lqad089. [PMID: 37850035 PMCID: PMC10578202 DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqad089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome annotation plays a crucial role in providing comprehensive catalog of genes and transcripts for a particular species. As research projects generate new transcriptome data worldwide, integrating this information into existing annotations becomes essential. However, most bioinformatics pipelines are limited in their ability to effectively and consistently update annotations using new RNA-seq data. Here we introduce TAGADA, an RNA-seq pipeline for Transcripts And Genes Assembly, Deconvolution, and Analysis. Given a genomic sequence, a reference annotation and RNA-seq reads, TAGADA enhances existing gene models by generating an improved annotation. It also computes expression values for both the reference and novel annotation, identifies long non-coding transcripts (lncRNAs), and provides a comprehensive quality control report. Developed using Nextflow DSL2, TAGADA offers user-friendly functionalities and ensures reproducibility across different computing platforms through its containerized environment. In this study, we demonstrate the efficacy of TAGADA using RNA-seq data from the GENE-SWiTCH project alongside chicken and pig genome annotations as references. Results indicate that TAGADA can substantially increase the number of annotated transcripts by approximately [Formula: see text] in these species. Furthermore, we illustrate how TAGADA can integrate Illumina NovaSeq short reads with PacBio Iso-Seq long reads, showcasing its versatility. TAGADA is available at github.com/FAANG/analysis-TAGADA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril Kurylo
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Toulouse, France
| | - Cervin Guyomar
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Toulouse, France
| | - Sylvain Foissac
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Toulouse, France
| | - Sarah Djebali
- IRSD, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, INRAE, ENVT, Univ Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UPS), Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith J, Alfieri JM, Anthony N, Arensburger P, Athrey GN, Balacco J, Balic A, Bardou P, Barela P, Bigot Y, Blackmon H, Borodin PM, Carroll R, Casono MC, Charles M, Cheng H, Chiodi M, Cigan L, Coghill LM, Crooijmans R, Das N, Davey S, Davidian A, Degalez F, Dekkers JM, Derks M, Diack AB, Djikeng A, Drechsler Y, Dyomin A, Fedrigo O, Fiddaman SR, Formenti G, Frantz LA, Fulton JE, Gaginskaya E, Galkina S, Gallardo RA, Geibel J, Gheyas AA, Godinez CJP, Goodell A, Graves JA, Griffin DK, Haase B, Han JL, Hanotte O, Henderson LJ, Hou ZC, Howe K, Huynh L, Ilatsia E, Jarvis ED, Johnson SM, Kaufman J, Kelly T, Kemp S, Kern C, Keroack JH, Klopp C, Lagarrigue S, Lamont SJ, Lange M, Lanke A, Larkin DM, Larson G, Layos JKN, Lebrasseur O, Malinovskaya LP, Martin RJ, Martin Cerezo ML, Mason AS, McCarthy FM, McGrew MJ, Mountcastle J, Muhonja CK, Muir W, Muret K, Murphy TD, Ng'ang'a I, Nishibori M, O'Connor RE, Ogugo M, Okimoto R, Ouko O, Patel HR, Perini F, Pigozzi MI, Potter KC, Price PD, Reimer C, Rice ES, Rocos N, Rogers TF, Saelao P, Schauer J, Schnabel RD, Schneider VA, Simianer H, Smith A, et alSmith J, Alfieri JM, Anthony N, Arensburger P, Athrey GN, Balacco J, Balic A, Bardou P, Barela P, Bigot Y, Blackmon H, Borodin PM, Carroll R, Casono MC, Charles M, Cheng H, Chiodi M, Cigan L, Coghill LM, Crooijmans R, Das N, Davey S, Davidian A, Degalez F, Dekkers JM, Derks M, Diack AB, Djikeng A, Drechsler Y, Dyomin A, Fedrigo O, Fiddaman SR, Formenti G, Frantz LA, Fulton JE, Gaginskaya E, Galkina S, Gallardo RA, Geibel J, Gheyas AA, Godinez CJP, Goodell A, Graves JA, Griffin DK, Haase B, Han JL, Hanotte O, Henderson LJ, Hou ZC, Howe K, Huynh L, Ilatsia E, Jarvis ED, Johnson SM, Kaufman J, Kelly T, Kemp S, Kern C, Keroack JH, Klopp C, Lagarrigue S, Lamont SJ, Lange M, Lanke A, Larkin DM, Larson G, Layos JKN, Lebrasseur O, Malinovskaya LP, Martin RJ, Martin Cerezo ML, Mason AS, McCarthy FM, McGrew MJ, Mountcastle J, Muhonja CK, Muir W, Muret K, Murphy TD, Ng'ang'a I, Nishibori M, O'Connor RE, Ogugo M, Okimoto R, Ouko O, Patel HR, Perini F, Pigozzi MI, Potter KC, Price PD, Reimer C, Rice ES, Rocos N, Rogers TF, Saelao P, Schauer J, Schnabel RD, Schneider VA, Simianer H, Smith A, Stevens MP, Stiers K, Tiambo CK, Tixier-Boichard M, Torgasheva AA, Tracey A, Tregaskes CA, Vervelde L, Wang Y, Warren WC, Waters PD, Webb D, Weigend S, Wolc A, Wright AE, Wright D, Wu Z, Yamagata M, Yang C, Yin ZT, Young MC, Zhang G, Zhao B, Zhou H. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022. Cytogenet Genome Res 2023; 162:405-528. [PMID: 36716736 PMCID: PMC11835228 DOI: 10.1159/000529376] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Smith
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James M. Alfieri
- Interdisciplinary Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Department of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | | | - Peter Arensburger
- Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, USA
| | - Giridhar N. Athrey
- Interdisciplinary Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Department of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | | | - Adam Balic
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philippe Bardou
- Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, GenPhySE, Sigenae, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | | | - Yves Bigot
- PRC, UMR INRAE 0085, CNRS 7247, Centre INRAE Val de Loire, Nouzilly, France
| | - Heath Blackmon
- Interdisciplinary Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Pavel M. Borodin
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Cell Biology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Rachel Carroll
- Department of Animal Sciences, Data Science and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Mathieu Charles
- University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Sigenae, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Hans Cheng
- USDA, ARS, USNPRC, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Lyndon M. Coghill
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Richard Crooijmans
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sean Davey
- University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Asya Davidian
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Fabien Degalez
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) − ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jack M. Dekkers
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
- INRAE, MIAT UR875, Sigenae, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Martijn Derks
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Abigail B. Diack
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Appolinaire Djikeng
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Alexander Dyomin
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | | | | | - Laurent A.F. Frantz
- Queen Mary University of London, Bethnal Green, London, UK
- Palaeogenomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Janet E. Fulton
- Hy-Line International, Research and Development, Dallas Center, Iowa, USA
| | - Elena Gaginskaya
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Svetlana Galkina
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Rodrigo A. Gallardo
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Johannes Geibel
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany
- Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Almas A. Gheyas
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cyrill John P. Godinez
- Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, Visayas State University, Baybay City, Philippines
| | | | - Jennifer A.M. Graves
- Department of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | | | - Jian-Lin Han
- CAAS-ILRI Joint Laboratory on Livestock and Forage Genetic Resources, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Olivier Hanotte
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Cells, Organisms and Molecular Genetics, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, The Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lindsay J. Henderson
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Zhuo-Cheng Hou
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, MARA, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Lan Huynh
- Institute for Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Evans Ilatsia
- Dairy Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Organization, Naivasha, Kenya
| | | | | | - Jim Kaufman
- Institute for Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Terra Kelly
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Steve Kemp
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Colin Kern
- Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics to Improve Poultry, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | | | - Christophe Klopp
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
| | - Sandrine Lagarrigue
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) − ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Susan J. Lamont
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
- INRAE, MIAT UR875, Sigenae, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Margaret Lange
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) − The Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anika Lanke
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California, USA
| | - Denis M. Larkin
- Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK
| | - Greger Larson
- The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John King N. Layos
- College of Agriculture and Forestry, Capiz State University, Mambusao, Philippines
| | - Ophélie Lebrasseur
- Centre d'Anthropobiologie et de Génomique de Toulouse (CAGT), CNRS UMR 5288, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lyubov P. Malinovskaya
- Department of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Rebecca J. Martin
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | | | | | - Michael J. McGrew
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Christine Kamidi Muhonja
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) − ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - William Muir
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Kévin Muret
- Université Paris-Saclay, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Evry, France
| | - Terence D. Murphy
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Masahide Nishibori
- Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Moses Ogugo
- Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) − ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ron Okimoto
- Cobb-Vantress, Siloam Springs, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ochieng Ouko
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Hardip R. Patel
- The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Francesco Perini
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - María Ines Pigozzi
- INBIOMED (CONICET-UBA), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Peter D. Price
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christian Reimer
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany
| | - Edward S. Rice
- Department of Animal Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Nicolas Rocos
- USDA, ARS, USNPRC, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Thea F. Rogers
- Department of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Perot Saelao
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
- Veterinary Pest Genetics Research Unit, USDA, Kerrville, Texas, USA
| | - Jens Schauer
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany
| | - Robert D. Schnabel
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Valerie A. Schneider
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Henner Simianer
- Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Adrian Smith
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark P. Stevens
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kyle Stiers
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Anna A. Torgasheva
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Cell Biology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Alan Tracey
- University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Sigenae, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Clive A. Tregaskes
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Lonneke Vervelde
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Wesley C. Warren
- Department of Animal Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Paul D. Waters
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Webb
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Steffen Weigend
- Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany
- Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anna Wolc
- INRAE, MIAT UR875, Sigenae, Castanet Tolosan, France
- Hy-Line International, Research and Development, Dallas Center, Iowa, USA
| | - Alison E. Wright
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dominic Wright
- AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Zhou Wu
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Masahito Yamagata
- Center for Brain Science, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Zhong-Tao Yin
- Department of Animal Sciences, Data Science and Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Guojie Zhang
- Center for Evolutionary and Organismal Biology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bingru Zhao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guan D, Halstead MM, Islas-Trejo AD, Goszczynski DE, Cheng HH, Ross PJ, Zhou H. Prediction of transcript isoforms in 19 chicken tissues by Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing. Front Genet 2022; 13:997460. [PMID: 36246588 PMCID: PMC9561881 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.997460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To identify and annotate transcript isoforms in the chicken genome, we generated Nanopore long-read sequencing data from 68 samples that encompassed 19 diverse tissues collected from experimental adult male and female White Leghorn chickens. More than 23.8 million reads with mean read length of 790 bases and average quality of 18.2 were generated. The annotation and subsequent filtering resulted in the identification of 55,382 transcripts at 40,547 loci with mean length of 1,700 bases. We predicted 30,967 coding transcripts at 19,461 loci, and 16,495 lncRNA transcripts at 15,512 loci. Compared to existing reference annotations, we found ∼52% of annotated transcripts could be partially or fully matched while ∼47% were novel. Seventy percent of novel transcripts were potentially transcribed from lncRNA loci. Based on our annotation, we quantified transcript expression across tissues and found two brain tissues (i.e., cerebellum and cortex) expressed the highest number of transcripts and loci. Furthermore, ∼22% of the transcripts displayed tissue specificity with the reproductive tissues (i.e., testis and ovary) exhibiting the most tissue-specific transcripts. Despite our wide sampling, ∼20% of Ensembl reference loci were not detected. This suggests that deeper sequencing and additional samples that include different breeds, cell types, developmental stages, and physiological conditions, are needed to fully annotate the chicken genome. The application of Nanopore sequencing in this study demonstrates the usefulness of long-read data in discovering additional novel loci (e.g., lncRNA loci) and resolving complex transcripts (e.g., the longest transcript for the TTN locus).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dailu Guan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Michelle M. Halstead
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Alma D. Islas-Trejo
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Daniel E. Goszczynski
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Hans H. Cheng
- USDA, ARS, USNPRC, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Pablo J. Ross
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Pablo J. Ross, ; Huaijun Zhou,
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Pablo J. Ross, ; Huaijun Zhou,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lagarrigue S, Lorthiois M, Degalez F, Gilot D, Derrien T. LncRNAs in domesticated animals: from dog to livestock species. Mamm Genome 2021; 33:248-270. [PMID: 34773482 PMCID: PMC9114084 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-021-09928-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Animal genomes are pervasively transcribed into multiple RNA molecules, of which many will not be translated into proteins. One major component of this transcribed non-coding genome is the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides with low coding-potential capabilities. Domestic animals constitute a unique resource for studying the genetic and epigenetic basis of phenotypic variations involving protein-coding and non-coding RNAs, such as lncRNAs. This review presents the current knowledge regarding transcriptome-based catalogues of lncRNAs in major domesticated animals (pets and livestock species), covering a broad phylogenetic scale (from dogs to chicken), and in comparison with human and mouse lncRNA catalogues. Furthermore, we describe different methods to extract known or discover novel lncRNAs and explore comparative genomics approaches to strengthen the annotation of lncRNAs. We then detail different strategies contributing to a better understanding of lncRNA functions, from genetic studies such as GWAS to molecular biology experiments and give some case examples in domestic animals. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current lncRNA annotations and suggest research directions to improve them and their functional characterisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthias Lorthiois
- Univ Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes) - UMR 6290, 2 av Prof Leon Bernard, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - Fabien Degalez
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - David Gilot
- CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, Université Rennes, UMR_S 1242, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Thomas Derrien
- Univ Rennes, CNRS, IGDR (Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes) - UMR 6290, 2 av Prof Leon Bernard, F-35000, Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Micheel J, Safrastyan A, Wollny D. Advances in Non-Coding RNA Sequencing. Noncoding RNA 2021; 7:70. [PMID: 34842804 PMCID: PMC8628893 DOI: 10.3390/ncrna7040070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) comprise a set of abundant and functionally diverse RNA molecules. Since the discovery of the first ncRNA in the 1960s, ncRNAs have been shown to be involved in nearly all steps of the central dogma of molecular biology. In recent years, the pace of discovery of novel ncRNAs and their cellular roles has been greatly accelerated by high-throughput sequencing. Advances in sequencing technology, library preparation protocols as well as computational biology helped to greatly expand our knowledge of which ncRNAs exist throughout the kingdoms of life. Moreover, RNA sequencing revealed crucial roles of many ncRNAs in human health and disease. In this review, we discuss the most recent methodological advancements in the rapidly evolving field of high-throughput sequencing and how it has greatly expanded our understanding of ncRNA biology across a large number of different organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Damian Wollny
- RNA Bioinformatics/High Throughput Analysis, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, Germany; (J.M.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
MacPhillamy C, Pitchford WS, Alinejad-Rokny H, Low WY. Opportunity to improve livestock traits using 3D genomics. Anim Genet 2021; 52:785-798. [PMID: 34494283 DOI: 10.1111/age.13135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The advent of high-throughput chromosome conformation capture and sequencing (Hi-C) has enabled researchers to probe the 3D architecture of the mammalian genome in a genome-wide manner. Simultaneously, advances in epigenomic assays, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-seq) and DNase-seq, have enabled researchers to study cis-regulatory interactions and chromatin accessibility across the same genome-wide scale. The use of these data has revealed many unique insights into gene regulation and disease pathomechanisms in several model organisms. With the advent of these high-throughput sequencing technologies, there has been an ever-increasing number of datasets available for study; however, this is often limited to model organisms. Livestock species play critical roles in the economies of developing and developed nations alike. Despite this, they are greatly underrepresented in the 3D genomics space; Hi-C and related technologies have the potential to revolutionise livestock breeding by enabling a more comprehensive understanding of how production traits are controlled. The growth in human and model organism Hi-C data has seen a surge in the availability of computational tools for use in 3D genomics, with some tools using machine learning techniques to predict features and improve dataset quality. In this review, we provide an overview of the 3D genome and discuss the status of 3D genomics in livestock before delving into advancing the field by drawing inspiration from research in human and mouse. We end by offering future directions for livestock research in the field of 3D genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C MacPhillamy
- Davies Livestock Research Centre, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Mudla Wirra Rd, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia
| | - W S Pitchford
- Davies Livestock Research Centre, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Mudla Wirra Rd, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia
| | - H Alinejad-Rokny
- Biological & Medical Machine Learning Lab, The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - W Y Low
- Davies Livestock Research Centre, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Mudla Wirra Rd, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Degalez F, Jehl F, Muret K, Bernard M, Lecerf F, Lagoutte L, Désert C, Pitel F, Klopp C, Lagarrigue S. Watch Out for a Second SNP: Focus on Multi-Nucleotide Variants in Coding Regions and Rescued Stop-Gained. Front Genet 2021; 12:659287. [PMID: 34306009 PMCID: PMC8293744 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.659287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Most single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are located in non-coding regions, but the fraction usually studied is harbored in protein-coding regions because potential impacts on proteins are relatively easy to predict by popular tools such as the Variant Effect Predictor. These tools annotate variants independently without considering the potential effect of grouped or haplotypic variations, often called "multi-nucleotide variants" (MNVs). Here, we used a large RNA-seq dataset to survey MNVs, comprising 382 chicken samples originating from 11 populations analyzed in the companion paper in which 9.5M SNPs- including 3.3M SNPs with reliable genotypes-were detected. We focused our study on in-codon MNVs and evaluate their potential mis-annotation. Using GATK HaplotypeCaller read-based phasing results, we identified 2,965 MNVs observed in at least five individuals located in 1,792 genes. We found 41.1% of them showing a novel impact when compared to the effect of their constituent SNPs analyzed separately. The biggest impact variation flux concerns the originally annotated stop-gained consequences, for which around 95% were rescued; this flux is followed by the missense consequences for which 37% were reannotated with a different amino acid. We then present in more depth the rescued stop-gained MNVs and give an illustration in the SLC27A4 gene. As previously shown in human datasets, our results in chicken demonstrate the value of haplotype-aware variant annotation, and the interest to consider MNVs in the coding region, particularly when searching for severe functional consequence such as stop-gained variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Degalez
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Frédéric Jehl
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Kévin Muret
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Maria Bernard
- INRAE, SIGENAE, Genotoul Bioinfo MIAT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.,INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | | | - Colette Désert
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Frédérique Pitel
- INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, GenPhySE UMR 1388, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Overbey EG, Ng TT, Catini P, Griggs LM, Stewart P, Tkalcic S, Hawkins RD, Drechsler Y. Transcriptomes of an Array of Chicken Ovary, Intestinal, and Immune Cells and Tissues. Front Genet 2021; 12:664424. [PMID: 34276773 PMCID: PMC8278112 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.664424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
While the chicken (Gallus gallus) is the most consumed agricultural animal worldwide, the chicken transcriptome remains understudied. We have characterized the transcriptome of 10 cell and tissue types from the chicken using RNA-seq, spanning intestinal tissues (ileum, jejunum, proximal cecum), immune cells (B cells, bursa, macrophages, monocytes, spleen T cells, thymus), and reproductive tissue (ovary). We detected 17,872 genes and 24,812 transcripts across all cell and tissue types, representing 73% and 63% of the current gene annotation, respectively. Further quantification of RNA transcript biotypes revealed protein-coding and lncRNAs specific to an individual cell/tissue type. Each cell/tissue type also has an average of around 1.2 isoforms per gene, however, they all have at least one gene with at least 11 isoforms. Differential expression analysis revealed a large number of differentially expressed genes between tissues of the same category (immune and intestinal). Many of these differentially expressed genes in immune cells were involved in cellular processes relating to differentiation and cell metabolism as well as basic functions of immune cells such as cell adhesion and signal transduction. The differential expressed genes of the different segments of the chicken intestine (jejunum, ileum, proximal cecum) correlated to the metabolic processes in nutrient digestion and absorption. These data should provide a valuable resource in understanding the chicken genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliah G Overbey
- Department of Genome Sciences, Interdepartmental Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Theros T Ng
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| | - Pietro Catini
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| | - Lisa M Griggs
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| | - Paul Stewart
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| | - Suzana Tkalcic
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| | - R David Hawkins
- Department of Genome Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Yvonne Drechsler
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jehl F, Degalez F, Bernard M, Lecerf F, Lagoutte L, Désert C, Coulée M, Bouchez O, Leroux S, Abasht B, Tixier-Boichard M, Bed'hom B, Burlot T, Gourichon D, Bardou P, Acloque H, Foissac S, Djebali S, Giuffra E, Zerjal T, Pitel F, Klopp C, Lagarrigue S. RNA-Seq Data for Reliable SNP Detection and Genotype Calling: Interest for Coding Variant Characterization and Cis-Regulation Analysis by Allele-Specific Expression in Livestock Species. Front Genet 2021; 12:655707. [PMID: 34262593 PMCID: PMC8273700 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.655707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In addition to their common usages to study gene expression, RNA-seq data accumulated over the last 10 years are a yet-unexploited resource of SNPs in numerous individuals from different populations. SNP detection by RNA-seq is particularly interesting for livestock species since whole genome sequencing is expensive and exome sequencing tools are unavailable. These SNPs detected in expressed regions can be used to characterize variants affecting protein functions, and to study cis-regulated genes by analyzing allele-specific expression (ASE) in the tissue of interest. However, gene expression can be highly variable, and filters for SNP detection using the popular GATK toolkit are not yet standardized, making SNP detection and genotype calling by RNA-seq a challenging endeavor. We compared SNP calling results using GATK suggested filters, on two chicken populations for which both RNA-seq and DNA-seq data were available for the same samples of the same tissue. We showed, in expressed regions, a RNA-seq precision of 91% (SNPs detected by RNA-seq and shared by DNA-seq) and we characterized the remaining 9% of SNPs. We then studied the genotype (GT) obtained by RNA-seq and the impact of two factors (GT call-rate and read number per GT) on the concordance of GT with DNA-seq; we proposed thresholds for them leading to a 95% concordance. Applying these thresholds to 767 multi-tissue RNA-seq of 382 birds of 11 chicken populations, we found 9.5 M SNPs in total, of which ∼550,000 SNPs per tissue and population with a reliable GT (call rate ≥ 50%) and among them, ∼340,000 with a MAF ≥ 10%. We showed that such RNA-seq data from one tissue can be used to (i) detect SNPs with a strong predicted impact on proteins, despite their scarcity in each population (16,307 SIFT deleterious missenses and 590 stop-gained), (ii) study, on a large scale, cis-regulations of gene expression, with ∼81% of protein-coding and 68% of long non-coding genes (TPM ≥ 1) that can be analyzed for ASE, and with ∼29% of them that were cis-regulated, and (iii) analyze population genetic using such SNPs located in expressed regions. This work shows that RNA-seq data can be used with good confidence to detect SNPs and associated GT within various populations and used them for different analyses as GTEx studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Jehl
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Fabien Degalez
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Maria Bernard
- INRAE, SIGENAE, Genotoul Bioinfo MIAT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.,INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | | | - Colette Désert
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Manon Coulée
- INRAE, INSTITUT AGRO, PEGASE UMR 1348, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Olivier Bouchez
- INRAE, US 1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Sophie Leroux
- INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, GenPhySE UMR 1388, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Behnam Abasht
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | | | - Bertrand Bed'hom
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | | | - Philippe Bardou
- INRAE, SIGENAE, Genotoul Bioinfo MIAT, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Hervé Acloque
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Sylvain Foissac
- INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, GenPhySE UMR 1388, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Sarah Djebali
- INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, GenPhySE UMR 1388, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Tatiana Zerjal
- INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, GABI UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Frédérique Pitel
- INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, GenPhySE UMR 1388, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tixier-Boichard M, Fabre S, Dhorne-Pollet S, Goubil A, Acloque H, Vincent-Naulleau S, Ross P, Wang Y, Chanthavixay G, Cheng H, Ernst C, Leesburg V, Giuffra E, Zhou H. Tissue Resources for the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes. Front Genet 2021; 12:666265. [PMID: 34234809 PMCID: PMC8256271 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.666265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to generate an atlas of the functional elements driving genome expression in domestic animals, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genome (FAANG) strategy was to sample many tissues from a few animals of different species, sexes, ages, and production stages. This article presents the collection of tissue samples for four species produced by two pilot projects, at INRAE (National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment) and the University of California, Davis. There were three mammals (cattle, goat, and pig) and one bird (chicken). It describes the metadata characterizing these reference sets (1) for animals with origin and selection history, physiological status, and environmental conditions; (2) for samples with collection site and tissue/cell processing; (3) for quality control; and (4) for storage and further distribution. Three sets are identified: set 1 comprises tissues for which collection can be standardized and for which representative aliquots can be easily distributed (liver, spleen, lung, heart, fat depot, skin, muscle, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells); set 2 comprises tissues requiring special protocols because of their cellular heterogeneity (brain, digestive tract, secretory organs, gonads and gametes, reproductive tract, immune tissues, cartilage); set 3 comprises specific cell preparations (immune cells, tracheal epithelial cells). Dedicated sampling protocols were established and uploaded in https://data.faang.org/protocol/samples. Specificities between mammals and chicken are described when relevant. A total of 73 different tissues or tissue sections were collected, and 21 are common to the four species. Having a common set of tissues will facilitate the transfer of knowledge within and between species and will contribute to decrease animal experimentation. Combining data on the same samples will facilitate data integration. Quality control was performed on some tissues with RNA extraction and RNA quality control. More than 5,000 samples have been stored with unique identifiers, and more than 4,000 were uploaded onto the Biosamples database, provided that standard ontologies were available to describe the sample. Many tissues have already been used to implement FAANG assays, with published results. All samples are available without restriction for further assays. The requesting procedure is described. Members of FAANG are encouraged to apply a range of molecular assays to characterize the functional status of collected samples and share their results, in line with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adeline Goubil
- University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Hervé Acloque
- University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | | | - Pablo Ross
- UC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Ying Wang
- UC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Ganrea Chanthavixay
- UC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Hans Cheng
- USDA-ARS Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Catherine Ernst
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Vicki Leesburg
- USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT, United States
| | - Elisabetta Giuffra
- University Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Huaijun Zhou
- UC Davis Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ren J, Li Q, Zhang Q, Clinton M, Sun C, Yang N. Systematic screening of long intergenic noncoding RNAs expressed during chicken embryogenesis. Poult Sci 2021; 100:101160. [PMID: 34058566 PMCID: PMC8170422 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as important regulators of many biological processes, including embryogenesis and development. To provide a systematic analysis of lncRNAs expressed during chicken embryogenesis, we used Iso-Seq and RNA-Seq to identify potential lncRNAs at embryonic stages from d 1 to d 8 of incubation: sequential stages covering gastrulation, somitogenesis, and organogenesis. The data characterized an expanded landscape of lncRNAs, yielding 45,410 distinct lncRNAs (31,282 genes). Amongst these, a set of 13,141 filtered intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs) transcribed from 9803 lincRNA gene loci, of which, 66.5% were novel, were further analyzed. These lincRNAs were found to share many characteristics with mammalian lincRNAs, including relatively short lengths, fewer exons, lower expression levels, and stage-specific expression patterns. Functional studies motivated by "guilt-by-association" associated individual lincRNAs with specific GO functions, providing an important resource for future studies of lincRNA function. Most importantly, a weighted gene co-expression network analysis suggested that genes of the brown module were specifically associated with the day 2 stage. LincRNAs within this module were co-expressed with proteins involved in hematopoiesis and lipid metabolism. This study presents the systematic identification of lincRNAs in developing chicken embryos and will serve as a powerful resource for the study of lincRNA functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junxiao Ren
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Quanlin Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Qinghe Zhang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Michael Clinton
- Division of Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom
| | - Congjiao Sun
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Yang
- National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding and MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|