The number of osteoclasts in a biopsy specimen can predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary osteosarcoma

Osteoclasts in Osteosarcoma: Mechanisms, Interactions, and Therapeutic Prospects

Osteosarcoma is an extremely malignant tumor, and its pathogenesis is complex and remains incompletely understood. Most cases of osteosarcoma are accompanied by symptoms of bone loss or result in pathological fractures due to weakened bones. Enhancing the survival rate of osteosarcoma patients has proven to be a long-standing challenge. Numerous studies mentioned in this paper, including in-vitro, in-vivo, and in-situ studies have consistently indicated a close association between the symptoms of bone loss associated with osteosarcoma and the presence of osteoclasts. As the sole cells capable of bone resorption, osteoclasts participate in a malignant cycle within the osteosarcoma microenvironment. These cells interact with osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells, secreting various factors that further influence these cells, disrupting bone homeostasis, and shifting the balance toward bone resorption, thereby promoting the onset and progression of osteosarcoma. Moreover, the interaction between osteoclasts and various other cells types, such as tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, DCs cells, T cells, and tumor-associated fibroblasts in the osteosarcoma microenvironment plays a crucial role in disease progression. Consequently, understanding the role of osteoclasts in osteosarcoma has sparked significant interest. This review primarily examines the physiological characteristics and functional mechanisms of osteoclasts in osteosarcoma, and briefly discusses potential therapies targeting osteoclasts for osteosarcoma treatment. These studies provide fresh ideas and directions for future research on the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Decoding the Impact of Tumor Microenvironment in Osteosarcoma Progression and Metastasis

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a heterogeneous, highly metastatic bone malignancy in children and adolescents. Despite advancements in multimodal treatment strategies, the prognosis for patients with metastatic or recurrent disease has not improved significantly in the last four decades. OS is a highly heterogeneous tumor; its genetic background and the mechanism of oncogenesis are not well defined. Unfortunately, no effective molecular targeted therapy is currently available for this disease. Understanding osteosarcoma's tumor microenvironment (TME) has recently gained much interest among scientists hoping to provide valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity, progression, metastasis, and the identification of novel therapeutic avenues. Here, we review the current understanding of the TME of OS, including different cellular and noncellular components, their crosstalk with OS tumor cells, and their involvement in tumor progression and metastasis. We also highlight past/current clinical trials targeting the TME of OS for effective therapies and potential future therapeutic strategies with negligible adverse effects.

A validation study for the utility of serum microRNA as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in patients with osteosarcoma

In our previous study, osteosarcoma advanced locally, and metastasis was promoted through the secretion of large number of small extracellular vesicles, followed by suppressing osteoclastogenesis via the upregulation of microRNA (miR)-146a-5p. An additional 12 miRNAs in small extracellular vesicles were also detected ≥6× as frequently in high-grade malignancy with the capacity to metastasize as in those with a low metastatic potential. However, the utility of these 13 miRNAs for determining the prognosis or diagnosis of osteosarcoma has not been validated in the clinical setting. In the present study, the utility of these miRNAs as prognostic and diagnostic markers was therefore assessed. In total, 30 patients with osteosarcoma were retrospectively reviewed, and the survival rate was compared according to the serum miRNA levels in 27 patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery. In addition, to confirm diagnostic competency for osteosarcoma, the serum miRNA levels were compared with those in patients with other bone tumors (n=112) and healthy controls (n=275). The patients with osteosarcoma with high serum levels of several miRNAs (miR-146a-5p, miR-1260a, miR-487b-3p, miR-1260b and miR-4758-3p) exhibited an improved survival rate compared with those with low levels. In particular, patients with high serum levels of miR-1260a exhibited a significantly improved overall survival rate, metastasis-free survival rate and disease-free survival rate compared with those with low levels. Thus, serum miR-1260a may potentially be a prognostic marker for patients with osteosarcoma. Moreover, patients with osteosarcoma had higher serum miR-1261 levels than those with benign or intermediate-grade bone tumors and thus may be a potential therapeutic target, in addition to being useful for differentiating whether or not a bone tumor is high-grade. A larger investigation is required to clarify the actual utility of these miRNAs in the clinical setting.

The interaction between osteosarcoma and other cells in the bone microenvironment: From mechanism to clinical applications

Osteosarcoma is a primary bone tumor with a high mortality rate. The event-free survival rate has not improved significantly in the past 30 years, which brings a heavy burden to patients and society. The high heterogeneity of osteosarcoma leads to the lack of specific targets and poor therapeutic effect. Tumor microenvironment is the focus of current research, and osteosarcoma is closely related to bone microenvironment. Many soluble factors and extracellular matrix secreted by many cells in the bone microenvironment have been shown to affect the occurrence, proliferation, invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma through a variety of signaling pathways. Therefore, targeting other cells in the bone microenvironment may improve the prognosis of osteosarcoma. The mechanism by which osteosarcoma interacts with other cells in the bone microenvironment has been extensively investigated, but currently developed drugs targeting the bone microenvironment have poor efficacy. Therefore, we review the regulatory effects of major cells and physical and chemical properties in the bone microenvironment on osteosarcoma, focusing on their complex interactions, potential therapeutic strategies and clinical applications, to deepen our understanding of osteosarcoma and the bone microenvironment and provide reference for future treatment. Targeting other cells in the bone microenvironment may provide potential targets for the development of clinical drugs for osteosarcoma and may improve the prognosis of osteosarcoma.

Prediction of response to preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in extremity high-grade osteosarcoma using X-ray and multiparametric MRI radiomics

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the value of applying X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models based on radiomics feature to predict response of extremity high-grade osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective dataset was assembled involving 102 consecutive patients (training dataset, n = 72; validation dataset, n = 30) diagnosed with extremity high-grade osteosarcoma. The clinical features of age, gender, pathological type, lesion location, bone destruction type, size, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were evaluated. Imaging features were extracted from X-ray and multi-parametric MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted) data. Features were selected using a two-stage process comprising minimal-redundancy-maximum-relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression (LR) modelling was then applied to establish models based on clinical, X-ray, and multi-parametric MRI data, as well as combinations of these datasets. Each model was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

AUCs of 5 models using clinical, X-ray radiomics, MRI radiomics, X-ray plus MRI radiomics, and combination of all were 0.760 (95% CI: 0.583-0.937), 0.706 (95% CI: 0.506-0.905), 0.751 (95% CI: 0.572-0.930), 0.796 (95% CI: 0.629-0.963), 0.828 (95% CI: 0.676-0.980), respectively. The DeLong test showed no significant difference between any pair of models (p > 0.05). The combined model yielded higher performance than the clinical and radiomics models as demonstrated by net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated difference improvement (IDI) values, respectively. This combined model was also found to be clinically useful in the decision curve analysis (DCA).

CONCLUSION

Modelling based on combination of clinical and radiomics data improves the ability to predict pathological responses to NAC in extremity high-grade osteosarcoma compared to the models based on either clinical or radiomics data.

Osteosarcoma and Metastasis Associated Bone Degradation-A Tale of Osteoclast and Malignant Cell Cooperativity

Cancer-induced bone degradation is part of the pathological process associated with both primary bone cancers, such as osteosarcoma, and bone metastases originating from, e.g., breast, prostate, and colon carcinomas. Typically, this includes a cancer-dependent hijacking of processes also occurring during physiological bone remodeling, including osteoclast-mediated disruption of the inorganic bone component and collagenolysis. Extensive research has revealed the significance of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption throughout the course of disease for both primary and secondary bone cancer. Nevertheless, cancer cells representing both primary bone cancer and bone metastasis have also been implicated directly in bone degradation. We will present and discuss observations on the contribution of osteoclasts and cancer cells in cancer-associated bone degradation and reciprocal modulatory actions between these cells. The focus of this review is osteosarcoma, but we will also include relevant observations from studies of bone metastasis. Additionally, we propose a model for cancer-associated bone degradation that involves a collaboration between osteoclasts and cancer cells and in which both cell types may directly participate in the degradation process.