Repeat and single dose administration of gadodiamide to rats to investigate concentration and location of gadolinium and the cell ultrastructure

In Vivo Evaluation of Innovative Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Designed for Bioimaging Applications

The aim of this study was the investigation of biochemical and histological changes induced in different tissues, as a result of the subcutaneous administration of Gd nanohydrogels (GdDOTA⸦CS-TPP/HA) in a CD-1 mouse strain. The nanohydrogels were obtained by encapsulating contrast agents (GdDOTA) in a biocompatible polymer matrix composed of chitosan (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) through the ionic gelation process. The effects of Gd nanohydrogels on the redox status were evaluated by measuring specific activities of the antioxidant enzymes catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), as well as oxidative stress markers, such as reduced glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and protein-reactive carbonyl groups (PRCG), in the liver, kidney, and heart tissues. The nitrosylated proteins expression were analyzed with Western Blot and the serum biochemical markers were measured with spectrophotometric methods. Also, a histological analysis of CD-1 mouse tissues was investigated. These results indicated that Gd nanohydrogels could potentially be an alternative to current MRI contrast agents thanks to their low toxicity in vivo.

Elemental Bioimaging of Sheep Bone and Articular Cartilage After Single Application of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents

BACKGROUND

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are applied to enhance magnetic resonance imaging. Gadolinium (Gd), a rare earth metal, is used in a chelated form when administered as GBCA to patients. There is an ongoing scientific debate about the clinical significance of Gd retention in tissues after administration of GBCAs. It is known that bone serves as Gd reservoir, but only sparse information on localization of Gd in bone is available.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare Gd tissue concentration and spatial distribution in femoral epiphysis and diaphysis 10 weeks after single-dose injection of linear and macrocyclic GBCAs in a large animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective animal study, Swiss-Alpine sheep (n = 36; age range, 4-10 years) received a single injection (0.1 mmol/kg) of macrocyclic (gadobutrol, gadoteridol, and gadoterate meglumine), linear (gadodiamide and gadobenate dimeglumine) GBCAs, or saline. Ten weeks after injection, sheep were killed, and femur heads and shafts were harvested. Gadolinium spatial distribution was determined in 1 sample of each treatment group by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. All bone specimens were analyzed histopathologically.

RESULTS

Injection of GBCAs in female Swiss-Alpine sheep (n = 36) resulted in Gd localization at the endosteal and periosteal surface and in a subset of GBCAs additionally at the cement lines and the bone cartilage junction. No histopathological alterations were observed in the investigated tissue specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten weeks after single injection of a clinically relevant dose in adult sheep, both linear species of GBCA resulted in considerably higher accumulation than macrocyclic GBCAs. Gadolinium deposits were restricted to distinct bone and cartilage compartments, such as in bone linings, cement lines, and bone cartilage junctions. Tissue histology remained unaffected.

Review of strategies to reduce the contamination of the water environment by gadolinium-based contrast agents

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are essential for diagnostic MRI examinations. GBCA are only used in small quantities on a per-patient basis; however, the acquisition of contrast-enhanced MRI examinations worldwide results in the use of many thousands of litres of GBCA per year. Data shows that these GBCA are present in sewage water, surface water, and drinking water in many regions of the world. Therefore, there is growing concern regarding the environmental impact of GBCA because of their ubiquitous presence in the aquatic environment. To address the problem of GBCA in the water system as a whole, collaboration is necessary between all stakeholders, including the producers of GBCA, medical professionals and importantly, the consumers of drinking water, i.e. the patients. This paper aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the opportunity to take the lead in making informed decisions about the use of GBCA and provides an overview of the different options for action.In this paper, we first provide a summary on the metabolism and clinical use of GBCA, then the environmental fate and observations of GBCA, followed by measures to reduce the use of GBCA. The environmental impact of GBCA can be reduced by (1) measures focusing on the application of GBCA by means of weight-based contrast volume reduction, GBCA with higher relaxivity per mmol of Gd, contrast-enhancing sequences, and post-processing; and (2) measures that reduce the waste of GBCA, including the use of bulk packaging and collecting residues of GBCA at the point of application.Critical relevance statement This review aims to make healthcare professionals aware of the environmental impact of GBCA and the opportunity for them to take the lead in making informed decisions about GBCA use and the different options to reduce its environmental burden.Key points• Gadolinium-based contrast agents are found in sources of drinking water and constitute an environmental risk.• Radiologists have a wide spectrum of options to reduce GBCA use without compromising diagnostic quality.• Radiology can become more sustainable by adopting such measures in clinical practice.

Effects of Gadolinium Retention in the Brains of Type 2 Diabetic Rats after Repeated Administration of Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agents on Neurobiology and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation

BACKGROUND

The neurotoxic potential of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (GBCAs) retention in the brains of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the deposition and clearance of GBCAs in T2DM rats and the mechanism by which Gd enhances nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation.

STUDY TYPE

Cross-sectional, prospective.

ANIMAL MODEL

104 T2DM male Wistar rats.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

9.4-T, T1-weighted fast spin echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

T2DM (male Wistar rats, n = 52) and control group (healthy, male Wistar rats, n = 52) rats received saline, gadodiamide, Gd-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, and gadoterate meglumine for four consecutive days per week for 7 weeks. The distribution and clearance of Gd in the certain brain were assessed by MRI (T1 signal intensity and relaxation rate R1, on the last day of each week), inductively coupled plasma mass-spectroscopy, ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and transmission electron microscopy. Behavioral tests, histopathological features, and the effects of GBCAs on neuroinflammation were also analyzed.

STATISTICAL TESTS

One-way analysis of variance, bonferroni method, and unpaired t-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The movement distance and appearance time in the open field test of the T2DM rats in the gadodiamide group were significantly shorter than in the other groups. Furthermore, the expression of NLRP3, Pro-Caspase-1, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD protein in neurons was significantly higher in the gadodiamide group than in the saline group, as shown by Western blot. Gadodiamide also induced differentiation of microglia into M1 type, decreased the neuronal mitochondrial membrane potential, and significantly increased neuronal apoptosis from flow cytometry.

DATA CONCLUSION

T2DM may affect both the deposition and clearance of GBCAs in the brain. Informed by the T2DM model, gadodiamide could mediate the neuroinflammatory response by NLRP3 inflammasome activation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Comprehensive Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Gadolinium, Iron, Manganese, and Phosphorus in the Brain of Healthy Rats After High-Dose Administrations of Gadodiamide and Gadobutrol

OBJECTIVES

After the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), residual gadolinium (Gd) has been detected in a few distinct morphological structures of the central nervous system (CNS). However, a systematic, comprehensive, and quantitative analysis of the spatial Gd distribution in the entire brain is not yet available. The first aim of this study is to provide this analysis in healthy rats after administration of high GBCA doses. The second aim is to assess the spatial distributions and possible Gd colocalizations of endogenous iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P). In addition, the presence of Gd in proximity to blood vessels was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male rats were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 3/group): saline (control), gadodiamide (linear GBCA), and gadobutrol (macrocyclic GBCA) with cumulative Gd doses of 14.4 mmol/kg of body mass. Five weeks after the last administration, the brains were collected and cryosectioned. The spatial distributions of Gd, Fe, Mn, and P were analyzed in a total of 130 sections, each covering the brain in 1 of the 3 perpendicular anatomical orientations, using laser ablation coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Quantitative spatial element maps were generated, and the concentrations of Gd, Fe, and Mn were measured in 31 regions of interest covering various distinct CNS structures. Correlation analyses were performed to test for possible colocalization of Gd, Fe, and Mn. The spatial proximity of Gd and blood vessels was studied using metal-tagged antibodies against von Willebrand factor with laser ablation coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

After administration of linear gadodiamide, high Gd concentrations were measured in many distinct structures of the gray matter. This involved structures previously reported to retain Gd after linear GBCA, such as the deep cerebellar nuclei or the globus pallidus, but also structures that had not been reported so far including the dorsal subiculum, the retrosplenial cortex, the superior olivary complex, and the inferior colliculus. The analysis in all 3 orientations allowed the localization of Gd in specific subregions and layers of certain structures, such as the hippocampus and the primary somatosensory cortex. After macrocyclic gadobutrol, the Gd tissue concentration was significantly lower than after gadodiamide. Correlation analyses of region of interest concentrations of Gd, Fe, and Mn revealed no significant colocalization of Gd with endogenous Fe or Mn in rats exposed to either GBCA. Immunohistochemistry revealed a colocalization of Gd traces with vascular endothelium in the deep cerebellar nuclei after gadobutrol, whereas the majority of Gd was found outside the vasculature after gadodiamide.

CONCLUSIONS

In rats exposed to gadodiamide but not in rats exposed to gadobutrol, high Gd concentrations were measured in various distinct CNS structures, and structures not previously reported were identified to contain Gd, including specific subregions and layers with different cytoarchitecture and function. Knowledge of these distinct spatial patterns may pave the way for tailored functional neurological testing. Signs for the localization of the remaining Gd in the vascular endothelium were prominent for gadobutrol but not gadodiamide. The results also indicate that local transmetalation with endogenous Fe or Mn is unlikely to explain the spatial patterns of Gd deposition in the brain, which argues against a general role of these metals in local transmetalation and release of Gd ions in the CNS.

Preclinical Safety Assessment of Gadopiclenol: A High-Relaxivity Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent

OBJECTIVE

Gadopiclenol is a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system and other body regions. The product has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration and is currently being evaluated by European Medicines Agency. For risk assessment of the single diagnostic use in humans, the safety profile of gadopiclenol was evaluated with a series of preclinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With exception of dose-ranging studies, all safety pharmacology and toxicology studies were performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice principles. Safety pharmacology studies were conducted to assess potential effects on cardiovascular (in vitro and in dogs), respiratory (in rats and guinea pigs), neurological (in rats), and renal endpoints (in rats). Toxicology studies were also performed to investigate acute toxicity (in rats and mice), extended single-dose (in rats and dogs) and repeated-dose toxicity (in rats and dogs), reproductive (in rats), developmental (in rats and rabbits) and juvenile toxicity (in rats), as well as genotoxicity (in vitro and in rats), local tolerance (in rabbits), potential immediate hypersensitivity (in guinea pigs), and potential tissue retention of gadolinium (in rats).

RESULTS

Safety pharmacology studies conducted at high intravenous (IV) doses showed a satisfactory tolerance of gadopiclenol in the main body systems. After either single or repeated IV dosing (14 and 28 days) in rats and dogs, gadopiclenol was well tolerated even at high doses. The no-observed-adverse-effect level values (ie, the highest experimental dose without adverse effects) representing between 8 times in rats and 44 times in dogs (based on the exposure), the exposure achieved in humans at the intended diagnostic dose, provide a high safety margin. No or only minor and reversible effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical signs, clinical pathology parameters, or histology were observed at the highest doses. The main histological finding consists in renal tubular vacuolations (exacerbated after repeated exposure), which supports a well-known finding for this class of compounds that has no physiological consequence on kidney function. Reproductive toxicity studies showed no evidence of effects on reproductive performance, fertility, perinatal and postnatal development in rats, or reproductive development in rats or rabbits. The safety profile of gadopiclenol in juvenile rats was satisfactory like in adults. Gadopiclenol was not genotoxic in vitro in the Ames test, a mouse lymphoma assay, and a rat in vivo micronucleus test. There were no signs of local intolerance at the injection site after IV and intra-arterial administration in rabbits. However, because of minor signs of intolerance after perivenous administration, misadministration must be avoided. Gadopiclenol exhibited no signs of potential to induce immediate hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.

CONCLUSIONS

High safety margins were observed between the single diagnostic dose of 0.05 mmol/kg in humans and the doses showing effects in animal studies. Gadopiclenol is, therefore, well tolerated in various species (mice, rats, dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs). All observed preclinical data support the clinical approval.

Evaluation of gadolinium-based contrast agents in juvenile CD-1 mice including behavioral evaluations

INTRODUCTION

Seven gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), four linear and three macrocyclic, were evaluated for potential effects on development, including behavior of juvenile CD-1 mice.

METHODS

The GBCAs were administered via intravenous injection once daily on postnatal day (PND) 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 (PND 1 was the day of delivery) at doses up to twice the human equivalent clinical dose (i.e., 0.63 mmol Gd/kg for gadoxetate disodium and 2.5 mmol Gd/kg for the other GBCAs). Mice were bled for evaluation of exposure (plasma) to gadolinium (Gd) on PND 9, 12, and 70. At scheduled euthanasia, the liver, spleen, brain, skin (dorsal surface), bone (left femur), and kidneys were excised from up to six mice/sex/group on PND 10, 22, or 70 for the determination of Gd levels and histopathological analysis. All mice were monitored for toxicity, growth and survival, sexual maturation, and behavior.

CONCLUSION

Gd was quantifiable in the brain tissues with levels declining over time. There was no long-term effect on the growth and development for mice exposed to any of the GBCAs. There was no impact on neurodevelopment as assessed by brain histology and validated neurobehavioral tests, including a functional observational battery, motor activity, and learning and memory as evaluated in the Morris water maze. For all GBCAs, the highest dose tested represented the no-observable-adverse-effect level in juvenile mice.

Ten years of gadolinium retention and deposition: ESMRMB-GREC looks backward and forward

In 2014, for the first time, visible hyperintensities on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the nucleus dentatus and globus pallidus of the brain were associated with previous Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) injections and gadolinium deposition in patients with normal renal function. This led to a frenzy of retrospective studies with varying methodologies that the European Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology Gadolinium Research and Educational Committee (ESMRMB-GREC) summarised in 2019. Now, after 10 years, the members of the ESMRMB-GREC look backward and forward and review the current state of knowledge of gadolinium retention and deposition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Gadolinium deposition is associated with the use of linear GBCA but no clinical symptoms have been associated with gadolinium deposition. KEY POINTS : • Traces of Gadolinium-based contrast agent-derived gadolinium can be retained in multiple organs for a prolonged time. • Gadolinium deposition is associated with the use of linear Gadolinium-based contrast agents. • No clinical symptoms have been associated with gadolinium deposition.

Where does the gadolinium go? A review into the excretion and retention of intravenous gadolinium

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are commonly used in medical imaging. Most intravenously (IV) administered gadolinium is excreted via the kidneys, and pathological retention in renal failure leading to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is well described. More recently, retention of gadolinium in the body in the absence of renal disease has been identified, with unknown clinical consequences. Many patients are aware of this, either through the media or via comprehensive consent documentation. Some internet sites, without hard evidence, have suggested a constellation of possible symptoms associated with GBCA retention. Recent experience with patients ascribing symptoms to a contrast-enhanced MRI examination prompted this review of the fate of injected GBCA after MRI study, and of information available to patients online regarding gadolinium retention.

The onset of rare earth metallosis begins with renal gadolinium-rich nanoparticles from magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent exposure

The leitmotifs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent-induced complications range from acute kidney injury, symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE)/gadolinium deposition disease, potentially fatal gadolinium encephalopathy, and irreversible systemic fibrosis. Gadolinium is the active ingredient of these contrast agents, a non-physiologic lanthanide metal. The mechanisms of MRI contrast agent-induced diseases are unknown. Mice were treated with a MRI contrast agent. Human kidney tissues from contrast-naïve and MRI contrast agent-treated patients were obtained and analyzed. Kidneys (human and mouse) were assessed with transmission electron microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy with X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy. MRI contrast agent treatment resulted in unilamellar vesicles and mitochondriopathy in renal epithelium. Electron-dense intracellular precipitates and the outer rim of lipid droplets were rich in gadolinium and phosphorus. We conclude that MRI contrast agents are not physiologically inert. The long-term safety of these synthetic metal-ligand complexes, especially with repeated use, should be studied further.

Gadolinium Deposition in the Rat Brain Measured with Quantitative MRI versus Elemental Mass Spectrometry

Background T1-weighted MRI and quantitative longitudinal relaxation rate (R1) mapping have been used to evaluate gadolinium retention in the brain after gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration. Whether MRI measures accurately reflect gadolinium regional distribution and concentration in the brain remains unclear. Purpose To compare gadolinium retention in rat forebrain measured with in vivo quantitative MRI R1 and ex vivo laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) mapping after gadobenate, gadopentetate, gadodiamide, or gadobutrol administration. Materials and Methods Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to one of five groups (eight per group) and administered gadobenate, gadopentetate, gadodiamide, gadobutrol (2.4 mmol/kg per week for 5 weeks), or saline (4.8 mL/kg per week for 5 weeks). MRI R1 mapping was performed at baseline and 1 week after the final injection to determine R1 and ΔR1. Postmortem brains from the same rats were analyzed with LA-ICP-MS elemental mapping to determine regional gadolinium concentrations. Student t tests were performed to compare results between GBCA and saline groups. Results Rats that were administered gadobenate showed gadolinium-related MRI ΔR1 in 39.5% of brain volume (ΔR1 = 0.087 second-1 ± 0.051); gadopentetate, 20.6% (ΔR1 = 0.069 second-1 ± 0.018); gadodiamide, 5.4% (ΔR1 = 0.055 second-1 ± 0.019); and gadobutrol, 2.2% (ΔR1 = 0.052 second-1 ± 0.041). Agent-specific gadolinium-related ΔR1 was detected in multiple forebrain regions (neocortex, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, thalamus, and caudate-putamen) in rats treated with gadobenate or gadopentetate, whereas rats treated with gadodiamide showed gadolinium-related ΔR1 in caudate-putamen. By contrast, LA-ICP-MS elemental mapping showed a similar regional distribution pattern of heterogeneous retained gadolinium in the forebrain of rats treated with gadobenate, gadopentetate, or gadodiamide, with the average gadolinium concentration of 0.45 μg · g-1 ± 0.07, 0.50 μg · g-1 ± 0.10, and 0.60 μg · g-1 ± 0.11, respectively. Low levels (0.01 μg · g-1 ± 0.00) of retained gadolinium were detected in the forebrain of gadobutrol-treated rats. Conclusion Differences in in vivo MRI longitudinal relaxation rate versus ex vivo elemental mass spectrometry measures of retained gadolinium in rat forebrains suggest that some forms of retained gadolinium may escape detection with MRI. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Different Impact of Gadopentetate and Gadobutrol on Inflammation-Promoted Retention and Toxicity of Gadolinium Within the Mouse Brain

OBJECTIVES

Using a murine model of multiple sclerosis, we previously showed that repeated administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine led to retention of gadolinium (Gd) within cerebellar structures and that this process was enhanced with inflammation. This study aimed to compare the kinetics and retention profiles of Gd in inflamed and healthy brains after application of the macrocyclic Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadobutrol or the linear GBCA gadopentetate. Moreover, potential Gd-induced neurotoxicity was investigated in living hippocampal slices ex vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice at peak of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE; n = 29) and healthy control mice (HC; n = 24) were exposed to a cumulative dose of 20 mmol/kg bodyweight of either gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobutrol (8 injections of 2.5 mmol/kg over 10 days). Magnetic resonance imaging (7 T) was performed at baseline as well as at day 1, 10, and 40 post final injection (pfi) of GBCAs. Mice were sacrificed after magnetic resonance imaging and brain and blood Gd content was assessed by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-mass spectrometry (MS) and ICP-MS, respectively. In addition, using chronic organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, Gd-induced neurotoxicity was addressed in living brain tissue ex vivo, both under control or inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α] at 50 ng/μL) conditions.

RESULTS

Neuroinflammation promoted a significant decrease in T1 relaxation times after multiple injections of both GBCAs as shown by quantitative T1 mapping of EAE brains compared with HC. This corresponded to higher Gd retention within the EAE brains at 1, 10, and 40 days pfi as determined by laser ablation-ICP-MS. In inflamed cerebellum, in particular in the deep cerebellar nuclei (CN), elevated Gd retention was observed until day 40 after last gadopentetate application (CN: EAE vs HC, 55.06 ± 0.16 μM vs 30.44 ± 4.43 μM). In contrast, gadobutrol application led to a rather diffuse Gd content in the inflamed brains, which strongly diminished until day 40 (CN: EAE vs HC, 0.38 ± 0.08 μM vs 0.17 ± 0.03 μM). The analysis of cytotoxic effects of both GBCAs using living brain tissue revealed an elevated cell death rate after incubation with gadopentetate but not gadobutrol at 50 mM. The cytotoxic effect due to gadopentetate increased in the presence of the inflammatory mediator TNF-α (with vs without TNF-α, 3.15% ± 1.18% vs 2.17% ± 1.14%; P = 0.0345).

CONCLUSIONS

In the EAE model, neuroinflammation promoted increased Gd retention in the brain for both GBCAs. Whereas in the inflamed brains, efficient clearance of macrocyclic gadobutrol during the investigated time period was observed, the Gd retention after application of linear gadopentetate persisted over the entire observational period. Gadopentetate but not gadubutrol appeared to be neurotoxic in an ex vivo paradigm of neuronal inflammation.

Comprehensive Speciation Analysis of Residual Gadolinium in Deep Cerebellar Nuclei in Rats Repeatedly Administered With Gadoterate Meglumine or Gadodiamide

PURPOSE

Several preclinical studies have reported the presence of gadolinium (Gd) in different chemical forms in the brain, depending on the class (macrocyclic versus linear) of Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA) administered. The aim of this study was to identify, with a special focus on insoluble species, the speciation of Gd retained in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) of rats administered repeatedly with gadoterate or gadodiamide 4 months after the last injection.

METHODS

Three groups (N = 6/group) of healthy female Sprague-Dawley rats (SPF/OFA rats; Charles River, L'Arbresle, France) received a cumulated dose of 50 mmol/kg (4 daily intravenous administrations of 2.5 mmol/kg, for 5 weeks, corresponding to 80-fold the usual clinical dose if adjusted for man) of gadoterate meglumine (macrocyclic) or gadodiamide (linear) or isotonic saline for the control group (4 daily intravenous administrations of 5 mL/kg, for 5 weeks). The animals were sacrificed 4 months after the last injection. Deep cerebellar nuclei were dissected and stored at -80°C before sample preparation. To provide enough tissue for sample preparation and further analysis using multiple techniques, DCN from each group of 6 rats were pooled. Gadolinium species were extracted in 2 consecutive steps with water and urea solution. The total Gd concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Soluble Gd species were analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. The insoluble Gd species were analyzed by single-particle (SP) ICP-MS, nanoscale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (NanoSIMS), and scanning transmission electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) for elemental detection.

RESULTS

The Gd concentrations in pooled DCN from animals treated with gadoterate or gadodiamide were 0.25 and 24.3 nmol/g, respectively. For gadoterate, the highest amount of Gd was found in the water-soluble fractions. It was present exclusively as low-molecular-weight compounds, most likely as the intact GBCA form. In the case of gadodiamide, the water-soluble fraction of DCN was composed of high-molecular-weight Gd species of approximately 440 kDa and contained only a tiny amount (less than 1%) of intact gadodiamide. Furthermore, the column recovery calculated for this fraction was incomplete, which suggested presence of labile complexes of dissociated Gd3+ with endogenous molecules. The highest amount of Gd was detected in the insoluble residue, which was demonstrated, by SP-ICP-MS, to be a particulate form of Gd. Two imaging techniques (NanoSIMS and STEM-EDX) allowed further characterization of these insoluble Gd species. Amorphous, spheroid structures of approximately 100-200 nm of sea urchin-like shape were detected. Furthermore, Gd was consistently colocalized with calcium, oxygen, and phosphorous, strongly suggesting the presence of structures composed of mixed Gd/Ca phosphates. No or occasional colocalization with iron and sulfur was observed.

CONCLUSION

A dedicated analytical workflow produced original data on the speciation of Gd in DCN of rats repeatedly injected with GBCAs. The addition, in comparison with previous studies of Gd speciation in brain, of SP element detection and imaging techniques allowed a comprehensive speciation analysis approach. Whereas for gadoterate the main fraction of retained Gd was present as intact GBCA form in the soluble fractions, for linear gadodiamide, less than 10% of Gd could be solubilized and characterized using size-exclusion chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. The main Gd species detected in the soluble fractions were macromolecules of 440 kDa. One of them was speculated to be a Gd complex with iron-binding protein (ferritin). However, the major fraction of residual Gd was present as insoluble particulate species, very likely composed of mixed Gd/Ca phosphates. This comprehensive Gd speciation study provided important evidence for the dechelation of linear GBCAs and offered a deeper insight into the mechanisms of Gd deposition in the brain.

Gadolinium: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in humans and laboratory animals following contrast agent administration

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have transformed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by facilitating the use of contrast-enhanced MRI to allow vital clinical diagnosis in a plethora of disease that would otherwise remain undetected. Although over 500 million doses have been administered worldwide, scientific research has documented the retention of gadolinium in tissues, long after exposure, and the discovery of a GBCA-associated disease termed nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, found in patients with impaired renal function. An understanding of the pharmacokinetics in humans and animals alike are pivotal to the understanding of the distribution and excretion of gadolinium and GBCAs, and ultimately their potential retention. This has been well studied in humans and more so in animals, and recently there has been a particular focus on potential toxicities associated with multiple GBCA administration. The purpose of this review is to highlight what is currently known in the literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of gadolinium in humans and animals, and any toxicity associated with GBCA use.