Carpenter bee thorax vibration and force generation inform pollen release mechanisms during floral buzzing

Turgor pressure affects transverse stiffness and resonant frequencies of buzz-pollinated poricidal anthers

Several agriculturally valuable plants store their pollen in tube-like poricidal anthers, which release pollen through buzz pollination. In this process, bees rapidly vibrate the anther using their indirect flight muscles. The stiffness and resonant frequency of the anther are crucial for effective pollen release, yet the impact of turgor pressure on these properties is not well understood. Here, we performed three-point flexure tests and experimental modal analysis to determine anther transverse stiffness and resonant frequency, respectively. Dynamic nanoindentation was used to identify the anther storage modulus as a function of excitation frequency. We subsequently developed mathematical models to estimate how turgor pressure changes after the anther is removed from a flower, thereby emulating zero water availability. We found that anther stiffness decreased by 60% at 30 min post-ablation and anther resonant frequency decreased by 20% at 60 min post-ablation. Models indicated that turgor pressure in the fresh anther was ~0.2-0.3 MPa. Our findings suggest that natural fluctuations in turgor pressure due to environmental factors such as temperature and light intensity may require bees to adjust their foraging behaviors. Interestingly, the anther storage modulus increased with excitation frequency, underscoring the need for more sophisticated mechanical models that consider viscous fluid transport through plant tissue.

Buzz-pollinating bees deliver thoracic vibrations to flowers through periodic biting

Pollinator behavior is vital to plant-pollinator interactions, affecting the acquisition of floral rewards, patterns of pollen transfer, and plant reproductive success. During buzz pollination, bees produce vibrations with their indirect flight muscles to extract pollen from tube-like flowers. Vibrations can be transmitted to the flower via the mandibles, abdomen, legs, or thorax directly. Vibration amplitude at the flower determines the rate of pollen release and should vary with the coupling of bee and flower. This coupling often occurs through anther biting, but no studies have quantified how biting affects flower vibration. Here, we used high-speed filmography to investigate how flower vibration amplitude changes during biting in Bombus terrestris visiting two species of buzz-pollinated flowering plants: Solanum dulcamara and Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). We found that floral buzzing drives head vibrations up to 3 times greater than those of the thorax, which doubles the vibration amplitude of the anther during biting compared with indirect vibration transmission when not biting. However, the efficiency of this vibration transmission depends on the angle at which the bee bites the anther. Variation in transmission mechanisms, combined with the diversity of vibrations across bee species, yields a rich assortment of potential strategies that bees could employ to access rewards from buzz-pollinated flowers.

Buzz pollination: Bee bites and floral vibrations

Certain bees bite tubular anthers while contracting their flight muscles. This floral sonication ejects pollen grains that the bees collect as larval food. Bees bite and buzz simultaneously. A new study shows that where and how they bite is essential for efficient pollen collection.

The Weis-Fogh Number Describes Resonant Performance Tradeoffs in Flapping Insects

Dimensionless numbers have long been used in comparative biomechanics to quantify competing scaling relationships and connect morphology to animal performance. While common in aerodynamics, few relate the biomechanics of the organism to the forces produced on the environment during flight. We discuss the Weis-Fogh number, N, as a dimensionless number specific to flapping flight, which describes the resonant properties of an insect and resulting tradeoffs between energetics and control. Originally defined by Torkel Weis-Fogh in his seminal 1973 paper, N measures the ratio of peak inertial to aerodynamic torque generated by an insect over a wingbeat. In this perspectives piece, we define N for comparative biologists and describe its interpretations as a ratio of torques and as the width of an insect's resonance curve. We then discuss the range of N realized by insects and explain the fundamental tradeoffs between an insect's aerodynamic efficiency, stability, and responsiveness that arise as a consequence of variation in N, both across and within species. N is therefore an especially useful quantity for comparative approaches to the role of mechanics and aerodynamics in insect flight.

Biomechanical properties of non-flight vibrations produced by bees

Bees use thoracic vibrations produced by their indirect flight muscles for powering wingbeats in flight, but also during mating, pollination, defence and nest building. Previous work on non-flight vibrations has mostly focused on acoustic (airborne vibrations) and spectral properties (frequency domain). However, mechanical properties such as the vibration's acceleration amplitude are important in some behaviours, e.g. during buzz pollination, where higher amplitude vibrations remove more pollen from flowers. Bee vibrations have been studied in only a handful of species and we know very little about how they vary among species. In this study, we conducted the largest survey to date of the biomechanical properties of non-flight bee buzzes. We focused on defence buzzes as they can be induced experimentally and provide a common currency to compare among taxa. We analysed 15,000 buzzes produced by 306 individuals in 65 species and six families from Mexico, Scotland and Australia. We found a strong association between body size and the acceleration amplitude of bee buzzes. Comparison of genera that buzz-pollinate and those that do not suggests that buzz-pollinating bees produce vibrations with higher acceleration amplitude. We found no relationship between bee size and the fundamental frequency of defence buzzes. Although our results suggest that body size is a major determinant of the amplitude of non-flight vibrations, we also observed considerable variation in vibration properties among bees of equivalent size and even within individuals. Both morphology and behaviour thus affect the biomechanical properties of non-flight buzzes.

Harvesting pollen with vibrations: towards an integrative understanding of the proximate and ultimate reasons for buzz pollination

Buzz pollination, a type of interaction in which bees use vibrations to extract pollen from certain kinds of flowers, captures a close relationship between thousands of bee and plant species. In the last 120 years, studies of buzz pollination have contributed to our understanding of the natural history of buzz pollination, and basic properties of the vibrations produced by bees and applied to flowers in model systems. Yet, much remains to be done to establish its adaptive significance and the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of buzz pollination across diverse plant and bee systems. Here, we review for bees and plants the proximate (mechanism and ontogeny) and ultimate (adaptive significance and evolution) explanations for buzz pollination, focusing especially on integrating across these levels to synthesize and identify prominent gaps in our knowledge. Throughout, we highlight new technical and modelling approaches and the importance of considering morphology, biomechanics and behaviour in shaping our understanding of the adaptive significance of buzz pollination. We end by discussing the ecological context of buzz pollination and how a multilevel perspective can contribute to explain the proximate and evolutionary reasons for this ancient bee-plant interaction.