Night home enteral nutrition as a novel enforced and physiologically effective nutrition therapy following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Older Adult Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The effect of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), a risk factor for postoperative mortality, in older adult patients with gastric cancer has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of low preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) on short- and long-term outcomes in older adult patients with gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 237 older adult patients with gastric cancer (≥75 years old) who underwent preoperative echocardiography and curative gastrectomy. LVSD was defined as an EF <50%. Postoperative complications and prognosis were compared between patients with low- and normal-EF using the Fisher's exact or Chi-square test, log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (5.4%) exhibited LVSD. The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.470), although the incidence of pneumonia was high (p=0.003) and overall survival was significantly worse in the low-EF group compared to the normal-EF group (p=0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed that decreased EF, low preoperative body mass index, and advanced pathological stage were significant prognostic factors in older adult patients with gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

LVSD increases the risk of postoperative pneumonia and has a negative prognostic impact on older adult patients with gastric cancer.

Long-Term Effects of Oral Nutritional Supplements After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Survival Analysis from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Weight loss (WL) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with both decreased compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy and impaired survival. This study examined the effects of administering oral nutritional supplements (ONS) for 3 months after gastrectomy in terms of compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes.

METHODS

This large-scale, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,003 gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. Patients were assigned to the control group (n = 503) or ONS group (n = 500). In the ONS group, 400 kcal/day of ONS was recommended in addition to a regular diet for 3 months after gastrectomy. Compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the ONS group showed significantly decreased WL at 3 months after gastrectomy (8.6 ± 6.1 vs. 7.2 ± 5.7%, respectively, P = 0.0004). The control and ONS groups did not differ regarding the induction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (84.9 vs. 82.8%, respectively, P = 0.614) or the continuation rate at 3 months postoperatively (75.3 vs. 76.6%, respectively, P = 0.809). Oral nutritional supplements for 3 months showed no survival benefit; the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 91.3% and 87.6% in the control group and 89.6% and 86.4% in the ONS group, respectively, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.548). Subgroup analysis could not detect a population in which ONS administration increased OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of ONS for 3 months after gastrectomy was not associated with increased compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy or with improved prognosis.

Impact of malnutrition and nutritional support after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Malnutrition, characterized by altered body composition and impaired function, is particularly prevalent among gastric cancer patients, affecting up to 60% of them. Malnutrition in these patients can manifest both before and after surgery, due to factors such as gastric outlet obstruction, cancer cachexia, and anatomical changes. Notably, total gastrectomy (TG) presents the most significant nutritional challenges. However, function-preserving gastrectomy, such as pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG), have shown promise in improving nutritional outcomes. Effective nutritional risk screening and assessment are vital for identifying patients at risk. Nutritional support not only improves nutritional parameters but also reduces complications, enhances quality of life (QoL) and survival rates. Those unable to maintain more than 50% of the recommended intake for over 7 days are recommended for nutritional support. Common methods of nutritional support include oral nutrition supplements (ONS), enteral nutrition (EN), or parenteral nutrition (PN) depending on the patient's status. Effect of perioperative nutritional support remains controversial. Preoperative interventions including ONS and PN have shown mixed results, with selective benefits in patients with sarcopenia or hypoalbuminaemia, while impact of EN in gastric outlet obstruction patients have been positive. In contrast postoperative support appears to be consistent. Tube feeding after TG has shown improvements, and ONS have been effective in reducing weight loss and improving nutritional biomarkers. PN was also associated with benefits such as weight maintenance and QoL. This review explores the mechanisms, assessment, and clinical impact of malnutrition, emphasizing the importance of nutritional support in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Impact of hypoglycemia after gastrectomy on Global Leader Initiative on Malnutrition-defined malnutrition: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The Global Leader Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were developed in 2018 as a global indicator of malnutrition, and the term 'malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome' was established. Recently, it has been reported that fluctuations in blood glucose are related to sarcopenia. In this study, we investigated the effects of glucose fluctuations on malnutrition after gastrectomy using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 69 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent curative gastrectomy between November 2017 and December 2020. CGM was performed over a 2-week period at 1 month and 1 year after surgery. The GLIM criteria included weight loss, the body mass index (BMI), and the psoas muscle mass index (PMI).

RESULTS

One year after surgery, 25 and 35 patients had severe and moderate malnutrition, respectively. The time below range (TBR) (percent of time the glucose concentration was < 70 mg/dL) and nocturnal (00:00-06:00) TBR were significantly higher in the severe malnutrition group than in the other groups (TBR: normal/moderate 17.9% vs. severe 21.6%, P = 0.039, nocturnal TBR; normal/moderate 30.6% vs. severe 41.1%, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-gastrectomy hypoglycemia, including long nocturnal hypoglycemia, was higher in severely malnourished patients than in other patients even 1 year after surgery. Prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia may be the key to improving malnutrition following gastrectomy.

ESPEN Guidelines on Clinical nutrition in surgery - Special issues to be revisited

The ESPEN Guidelines on Clinical nutrition in Surgery from 2017 has been also available as practical guideline with algorithms since 2021 (www.espen.org). An update will be perfomed in the near future. This review focuses on recent data with regard to special issues and topics to be revisited in the guidelines: These are nutritional assessment, sarcopenic obesity, prehabilitation, oral/enteral immunonutrition, postoperative oral supplementation in hospital and after discharge.