Evaluation and comparison of unsupervised methods for the extraction of spatial patterns from mass spectrometry imaging data (MSI)

Advances in Imaging Mass Spectrometry for Biomedical and Clinical Research

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) allows for the untargeted mapping of biomolecules directly from tissue sections. This technology is increasingly integrated into biomedical and clinical research environments to supplement traditional microscopy and provide molecular context for tissue imaging. IMS has widespread clinical applicability in the fields of oncology, dermatology, microbiology, and others. This review summarizes the two most widely employed IMS technologies, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), and covers technological advancements, including efforts to increase spatial resolution, specificity, and throughput. We also highlight recent biomedical applications of IMS, primarily focusing on disease diagnosis, classification, and subtyping.

Aggregated Molecular Phenotype Scores: Enhancing Assessment and Visualization of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data for Tissue-Based Diagnostics

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has gained increasing popularity for tissue-based diagnostics due to its ability to identify and visualize molecular characteristics unique to different phenotypes within heterogeneous samples. Data from MSI experiments are often assessed and visualized using various supervised and unsupervised statistical approaches. However, these approaches tend to fall short in identifying and concisely visualizing subtle, phenotype-relevant molecular changes. To address these shortcomings, we developed aggregated molecular phenotype (AMP) scores. AMP scores are generated using an ensemble machine learning approach to first select features differentiating phenotypes, weight the features using logistic regression, and combine the weights and feature abundances. AMP scores are then scaled between 0 and 1, with lower values generally corresponding to class 1 phenotypes (typically control) and higher scores relating to class 2 phenotypes. AMP scores, therefore, allow the evaluation of multiple features simultaneously and showcase the degree to which these features correlate with various phenotypes. Due to the ensembled approach, AMP scores are able to overcome limitations associated with individual models, leading to high diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. Here, AMP score performance was evaluated using metabolomic data collected from desorption electrospray ionization MSI. Initial comparisons of cancerous human tissues to their normal or benign counterparts illustrated that AMP scores distinguished phenotypes with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, when combined with spatial coordinates, AMP scores allow visualization of tissue sections in one map with distinguished phenotypic borders, highlighting their diagnostic utility.

Utilizing Aggregated Molecular Phenotype (AMP) Scores to Visualize Simultaneous Molecular Changes in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has gained increasing popularity for tissue-based diagnostics due to its ability to identify and visualize molecular characteristics unique to different phenotypes within heterogeneous samples. Data from MSI experiments are often visualized using single ion images and further analyzed using machine learning and multivariate statistics to identify m/z features of interest and create predictive models for phenotypic classification. However, often only a single molecule or m/z feature is visualized per ion image, and mainly categorical classifications are provided from the predictive models. As an alternative approach, we developed an aggregated molecular phenotype (AMP) scoring system. AMP scores are generated using an ensemble machine learning approach to first select features differentiating phenotypes, weight the features using logistic regression, and combine the weights and feature abundances. AMP scores are then scaled between 0 and 1, with lower values generally corresponding to class 1 phenotypes (typically control) and higher scores relating to class 2 phenotypes. AMP scores therefore allow the evaluation of multiple features simultaneously and showcase the degree to which these features correlate with various phenotypes, leading to high diagnostic accuracy and interpretability of predictive models. Here, AMP score performance was evaluated using metabolomic data collected from desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) MSI. Initial comparisons of cancerous human tissues to normal or benign counterparts illustrated that AMP scores distinguished phenotypes with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, when combined with spatial coordinates, AMP scores allow visualization of tissue sections in one map with distinguished phenotypic borders, highlighting their diagnostic utility.