Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine on in ABO blood type incompatible kidney transplant recipients treated with low-dose rituximab

Global burden of vaccine-associated kidney injury using an international pharmacovigilance database

Global evidence on the association between vaccines and renal adverse events (AEs) is inconclusive. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed a total of 120,715,116 reports from VigiBase collected between 1967 and 2022. We evaluated the global reporting of acute kidney injury (AKI), glomerulonephritis (GN), and tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and assessed disproportionate signals between vaccines and renal AEs using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the information component (IC025) in comparison with the entire database. The number and proportion of reports on AKI, GN, and TIN gradually increased, with a substantial increase after 2020. Disproportionate reporting of AKI was significant for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (ROR, 2.38; IC025, 1.09). Fourteen vaccines were significantly disproportionate for higher GN reporting, and the highest disproportionality for GN reporting was observed for COVID-19 mRNA (ROR, 13.41; IC025, 2.90) and hepatitis B vaccines (ROR, 11.35; IC025, 3.18). Disproportionate TIN reporting was significant for COVID-19 mRNA (ROR, 2.43; IC025, 0.99) and human papillomavirus (ROR, 1.75; IC025, 0.19) vaccines. Significant disproportionality in the reporting of AKI, GN, and TIN was observed in patients exposed to multiple vaccines, including COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, alongside increasing global reports of vaccine-associated renal AEs.

Herpes zoster development in living kidney transplant recipients receiving low-dose rituximab

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether a history of low-dose rituximab treatment affected herpes zoster development after living kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We enrolled 103 living kidney transplant recipients. Patients were divided into two groups according to their history of rituximab treatment; rituximab was administered to 50 living kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the difference in herpes zoster events between the two groups and determined the risk factors for herpes zoster using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

The total dose of rituximab in each kidney transplant recipient who received rituximab therapy was 200-400 mg. The rate of herpes zoster events after transplantation in recipients who received rituximab therapy (4 of 50, 8%) was not higher than that in recipients who did not receive rituximab (9 of 53, 17%) (p = 0.238). Herpes zoster-free survival did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.409). In the multivariate regression analysis, the association between varicella zoster vaccination before transplantation and herpes zoster events after transplantation was confirmed, whereas rituximab therapy was not associated with herpes zoster events.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rituximab therapy in kidney transplant recipients did not influence herpes zoster development after transplantation. Varicella zoster vaccination before transplantation may play an important role in preventing herpes zoster after transplantation.

Immunogenicity and Predictive Factors Associated with Poor Response after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccination in Lung Transplant Patients

Lung transplant patients are more likely to develop severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with the general population and should be vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, previous studies have reported reduced vaccination immunogenicity in lung transplantation patients. We aimed to investigate the serological response and associated factors after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population. Lung transplant patients without a history of contracting coronavirus disease who had received a second or higher dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were enrolled. The anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike and neutralizing antibody levels were measured in blood samples. Firth's logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with non-response after vaccination. Forty-six lung transplant patients were enrolled, of which sixteen (34.8%) showed a serological response to vaccination. All patients who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination before transplantation (n = 5) exhibited a serological response. No significant difference was observed in anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody or neutralization titers based on the number and timing of vaccination. Firth's logistic regression showed an association between lower hemoglobin levels (odds ratio, 0.59; confidence interval, 0.35-0.92; p = 0.017) and non-response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Lung transplant patients showed poor serologic responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this pilot study; anemia may be associated with this poor response.

Measures to Increase Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review

Purpose of review: To review the data on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines, administered by different strategies, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Recent findings: COVID-19 booster vaccines were given to SOTRs as a widespread practice in many transplant centers, mostly as the third and/or fourth dose in an extended vaccine series, with a significantly improved humoral response compared with the initial two-dose scheme. However, one-third of SOTRs remained unresponsive, despite these boosters. Next steps: Vaccination with standard dosing remains the most feasible strategy for attaining protection against COVID-19. Additional booster doses and temporarily holding or reducing mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid may provide immunogenicity to vaccines, according to recent studies demonstrating some efficacy with these measures. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies showed benefit in immunocompromised patients but is no longer recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) due to diminished efficacy against Omicron and recent variants. Screening for the presence and titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in SOTRs is not recommended in most clinical settings. T cell-based techniques are needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy and risk of infection. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, new vaccines based on conservative protein component/complexes of the COVID virus, in addition to its spike protein, are warranted to offer prolonged protection.