Palbociclib demonstrates intracranial activity in progressive brain metastases harboring cyclin-dependent kinase pathway alterations

The Dance Between Tumor Molecular Biology and Antitumor Immune Response

When the cyclin kinase 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib was sequenced with PD-1 blockade in mostly immunologically "cold" murine models, enhanced immune-mediated antitumor effects-including increased lifespan, recruitment of CD8 cells to tumor, reduction of regulatory T-cell and immunosuppressive cytokines in tumor, increased tumor antigen presentation, and broadening of the T-cell receptor repertoire-were achieved in both cutaneous and brain metastases. See related article by Nayyar et al., p. 420.

CDK4/6 Inhibition Sensitizes Intracranial Tumors to PD-1 Blockade in Preclinical Models of Brain Metastasis

PURPOSE

Brain metastases are associated with high morbidity and are often resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated whether CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) abemaciclib can sensitize intracranial tumors to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibition in mouse models of melanoma and breast cancer brain metastasis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Treatment response was evaluated in vivo using immunocompetent mouse models of brain metastasis bearing concurrent intracranial and extracranial tumors. Treatment effect on intracranial and extracranial tumor-immune microenvironments (TIME) was evaluated using immunofluorescence, multiplex immunoassays, high-parameter flow cytometry, and T-cell receptor profiling. Mice with humanized immune systems were evaluated using flow cytometry to study the effect of CDKi on human T-cell development.

RESULTS

We found that combining abemaciclib with PD-1 inhibition reduced tumor burden and improved overall survival in mice. The TIME, which differed on the basis of anatomic location of tumors, was altered with CDKi and PD-1 inhibition in an organ-specific manner. Combination abemaciclib and anti-PD-1 treatment increased recruitment and expansion of CD8+ effector T-cell subsets, depleted CD4+ regulatory T (Treg) cells, and reduced levels of immunosuppressive cytokines in intracranial tumors. In immunodeficient mice engrafted with human immune systems, abemaciclib treatment supported development and maintenance of CD8+ T cells and depleted Treg cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the distinct properties of intracranial and extracranial tumors and support clinical investigation of combination CDK4/6 and PD-1 inhibition in patients with brain metastases. See related commentary by Margolin, p. 257.

Combination of Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer With or Without Brain Metastases

OBJECTIVE

This real-world study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real world in a Chinese population.

METHODS

The clinical data of consecutively enrolled patients from the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center, and the University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital were collected. Progression-free survival curves were generated using log-rank tests with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors affecting progression-free survival.

RESULTS

In total, 118 patients were enrolled, including 6 patients with brain metastases. At the last follow-up date, the median progression-free survival was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.1-22.5), with the 6-month and 12-month progression-free survival rates of 77.1% and 57.6%, respectively. The disease control rate and the intracranial disease control rate were 82.2% and 50%, respectively. A longer progression-free survival was observed for patients with the following characteristics: treatment-naive; without hepatic metastasis; sensitive to previous endocrine therapy and harboring fewer metastatic sites. The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that treatment lines and exposure to palliative chemotherapy were independent influencing factors of progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer was effective and well-tolerated, even in patients with brain metastases. More benefits were observed in frontline therapy, chemotherapy-naive, and endocrine therapy-sensitive patients with fewer metastatic sites.

Structural and functional vascular dysfunction within brain metastases is linked to pembrolizumab inefficacy

Structurally and functionally aberrant vasculature is a hallmark of tumor angiogenesis and treatment resistance. Given the synergistic link between aberrant tumor vasculature and immunosuppression, we analyzed perfusion MRI for 44 patients with brain metastases (BM) undergoing treatment with pembrolizumab. To date, vascular-immune communication, or the relationship between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy and vascular architecture, has not been well-characterized in human imaging studies. We found that ICI-responsive BM possessed a structurally balanced vascular makeup, which was linked to improved vascular efficiency and an immune-stimulatory microenvironment. In contrast, ICI-resistant BM were characterized by a lack of immune cell infiltration and a highly aberrant vasculature dominated by large-caliber vessels. Peri-tumor region analysis revealed early functional changes predictive of ICI resistance before radiographic evidence on conventional MRI. This study was one of the largest functional imaging studies for BM and establishes a foundation for functional studies that illuminate the mechanisms linking patterns of vascular architecture with immunosuppression, as targeting these aspects of cancer biology may serve as the basis for future combination treatments.

Leveraging translational insights toward precision medicine approaches for brain metastases

Due to increasing incidence and limited treatments, brain metastases (BM) are an emerging unmet need in modern oncology. Development of effective therapeutics has been hindered by unique challenges. Individual steps of the brain metastatic cascade are driven by distinctive biological processes, suggesting that BM possess intrinsic biological differences compared to primary tumors. Here, we discuss the unique physiology and metabolic constraints specific to BM as well as emerging treatment strategies that leverage potential vulnerabilities.

Pembrolizumab in brain metastases of diverse histologies: phase 2 trial results

Brain metastases (BMs) are an emerging challenge in oncology due to increasing incidence and limited treatments. Here, we present results of a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluating intracranial efficacy of pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor, in 9 patients with untreated BMs (cohort A) and 48 patients with recurrent and progressive BMs (cohort B) across different histologies. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving intracranial benefit, defined by complete response, partial response or stable disease. The primary endpoint was met with an intracranial benefit rate of 42.1% (90% confidence interval (CI): 31-54%). The median overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was 8.0 months (90% CI: 5.5-8.7 months) across both cohorts, 6.5 months (90% CI: 4.5-18.7 months) for cohort A and 8.1 months (90% CI: 5.3-9.6 months) for cohort B. Seven patients (12.3%), encompassing breast, melanoma and sarcoma histologies, had overall survival greater than 2 years. Thirty patients (52%; 90% CI: 41-64%) had one or more grade-3 or higher adverse events that were at least possibly treatment related. Two patients had grade-4 adverse events (cerebral edema) that were deemed at least possibly treatment related. These results suggest that programmed cell death protein 1 blockade may benefit a select group of patients with BMs, and support further studies to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02886585.

Breast Cancer with Brain Metastasis: Molecular Insights and Clinical Management

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Brain metastases are a primary contributor to mortality, as they often go undetected until late stages due to their dormant nature. Moreover, the clinical management of brain metastases is complicated by the relevant issue of blood-brain barrier penetration. The molecular pathways involved in the formation, progression, and colonization of primary breast tumors and subsequent brain metastases are diverse, posing significant hurdles due to the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer subtypes. Despite advancements in primary breast cancer treatments, the prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor. In this review, we aim to highlight the biological mechanisms of breast cancer brain metastases by evaluating multi-step genetic pathways and to discuss currently available and emerging treatment strategies to propose a prospective overview of the management of this complex disease.

Efficacy of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors and Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are the standard of care for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients. However, their role in the treatment of brain metastases is currently unclear. We retrospectively evaluate the results of patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer treated at our institution with CDK4/6i and radiotherapy to the brain. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and severe toxicity. Among 371 pts treated with CDK4/6i, 24 pts (6.5%) received radiotherapy to the brain before (11 pts), during (6 pts), or after (7 pts) CDK4/6i treatment. Sixteen pts received ribociclib, six received palbociclib, and two received abemaciclib. Six- and twelve-month PFS was 76.5% (95% CI: 60.3-96.9) and 49.7% (95% CI: 31.7-77.9), respectively, whereas six- and twelve-month LC was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7-100) and 68.8% (95% CI: 44.5-100), respectively. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, no unexpected toxicity was observed. We conclude that treatment with both CDK4/6i and brain radiotherapy is feasible and should not increase the toxicity compared to brain radiotherapy or CDK4/6i alone. However, the small number of individuals treated concurrently limits the conclusions about the combination of both modalities, and the results from ongoing prospective clinical trials are eagerly awaited to understand both the toxicity profile and the clinical response fully.

Immunogenomic analysis of human brain metastases reveals diverse immune landscapes across genetically distinct tumors

Brain metastases (BrMs) are the most common form of brain tumors in adults and frequently originate from lung and breast primary cancers. BrMs are associated with high mortality, emphasizing the need for more effective therapies. Genetic profiling of primary tumors is increasingly used as part of the effort to guide targeted therapies against BrMs, and immune-based strategies for the treatment of metastatic cancer are gaining momentum. However, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BrM is extremely heterogeneous, and whether specific genetic profiles are associated with distinct immune states remains unknown. Here, we perform an extensive characterization of the immunogenomic landscape of human BrMs by combining whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing of immune cell populations, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and tissue imaging analyses. This revealed unique TIME phenotypes in genetically distinct lung- and breast-BrMs, thereby enabling the development of personalized immunotherapies tailored by the genetic makeup of the tumors.

Leveraging Molecular and Immune-Based Therapies in Leptomeningeal Metastases

Leptomeningeal metastases represent an aggressive stage of cancer with few durable treatment options. Improved understanding of cancer biology, neoplastic reliance on oncogenic driver mutations, and complex immune system interactions have resulted in an explosion in cancer-directed therapy in the last two decades to include small molecule inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Most of these therapeutics are underexplored in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, limiting extrapolation of extracranial and even intracranial efficacy outcomes to the unique leptomeningeal space. Further confounding our interpretation of drug activity in the leptomeninges is an incomplete understanding of drug penetration through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier of the choroid plexus. Nevertheless, a number of retrospective studies and promising prospective trials provide evidence of leptomeningeal activity of several small molecule and immune checkpoint inhibitors and underscore potential areas of further therapeutic development for patients harboring leptomeningeal disease.

Brain metastasis screening in the molecular age

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) amongst cancer patients has been increasing due to improvements in therapeutic options and an increase in overall survival. Molecular characterization of tumors has provided insights into the biology and oncogenic drivers of BM and molecular subtype-based screening. Though there are currently some screening and surveillance guidelines for BM, they remain limited. In this comprehensive review, we review and present epidemiological data on BM, their molecular characterization, and current screening guidelines. The molecular subtypes with the highest BM incidence are epithelial growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRCA1, triple-negative (TN), and HER2+ breast cancers, and BRAF-mutated melanoma. Furthermore, BMs are more likely to present asymptomatically at diagnosis in oncogene-addicted NSCLC and BRAF-mutated melanoma. European screening standards recommend more frequent screening for oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients, and clinical trials are investigating screening for BM in hormone receptor+, HER2+, and TN breast cancers. However, more work is needed to determine optimal screening guidelines for other primary cancer molecular subtypes. With the advent of personalized medicine, molecular characterization of tumors has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment and prognostication. Incorporating molecular characterization into BM screening guidelines may allow physicians to better identify patients at high risk for BM development and improve patient outcomes.

Clinicopathologic and genomic characterizations of brain metastases using a comprehensive genomic panel

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is the most common brain tumor type in adults. Compared to their primary tumors, these metastases undergo a variety of genetic changes to be able to survive and thrive in the complex tissue microenvironment of the brain. In clinical settings, the majority of traditional chemotherapies have shown limited efficacy against CNS metastases. However, the discovery of potential driver mutations, and the development of drugs specifically targeting affected signaling pathways, could change the treatment landscape of CNS metastasis. Genetic studies of brain tumors have so far focused mainly on common cancers in western populations. In this study, we performed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) on 50 pairs of primary tumors, including but not limited to colorectal, breast, renal and thyroid tumors, along with their brain metastatic tumor tissue counterparts, from three different local tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia. We identified potentially clinically relevant mutations in brain metastases that were not detected in corresponding primary tumors, including mutations in the PI3K, CDK, and MAPK pathways. These data highlight the differences between primary cancers and brain metastases and the importance of acquiring and analyzing brain metastatic samples for further clinical management.

Leptomeningeal Metastases: New Opportunities in the Modern Era

Leptomeningeal metastases arise from cancer cell entry into the subarachnoid space, inflicting significant neurologic morbidity and mortality across a wide range of malignancies. The modern era of cancer therapeutics has seen an explosion of molecular-targeting agents and immune-mediated strategies for patients with breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies, with meaningful extracranial disease control and improvement in patient survival. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents in those with leptomeningeal metastases remains understudied, due to the relative rarity of this patient population, the investigational challenges associated with studying this dynamic disease state, and brisk disease pace. Nevertheless, retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, and small prospective trials in the last two decades provide a glimmer of hope for patients with leptomeningeal metastases, suggesting that several cancer-directed strategies are not only active in the intrathecal space but also improve survival against historical odds. The continued development of clinical trials devoted to patients with leptomeningeal metastases is critical to establish robust efficacy outcomes in this patient population, define drug pharmacokinetics in the intrathecal space, and uncover new avenues for treatment in the face of leptomeningeal therapeutic resistance.

Systemic Therapy Approaches for Breast Cancer Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastasis arising from breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Various systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies which are effective against breast cancer often fail to provide benefits against brain metastasis. This is mainly due to limited penetration of the therapies across the blood-brain barrier, and divergent evolution of brain metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Thus, brain metastasis is typically treated upfront with local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, followed by systemic therapies. Systemic therapies with CNS permeability are favored in patients with brain metastasis. This paper reviews various systemic therapy options for breast cancer brain metastasis.

Targeting CDK4 and 6 in Cancer Therapy: Emerging Preclinical Insights Related to Abemaciclib

Pharmacologic inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and 6) are approved for the treatment of subsets of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). In metastatic disease, strategies involving endocrine therapy combined with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4 and 6i) improve clinical outcomes in HR+ BCs. CDK4 and 6i prevent retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein phosphorylation, thereby blocking the transcription of E2F target genes, which in turn inhibits both mitogen and estrogen-mediated cell proliferation. In this review, we summarize preclinical data pertaining to the use of CDK4 and 6i in BC, with a particular focus on several of the unique chemical, pharmacologic, and mechanistic properties of abemaciclib. As research efforts elucidate the novel mechanisms underlying abemaciclib activity, potential new applications are being identified. For example, preclinical studies have demonstrated abemaciclib can exert antitumor activity against multiple tumor types and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Abemaciclib has also demonstrated distinct activity as a monotherapeutic in the treatment of BC. Accordingly, we also discuss how a greater understanding of mechanisms related to CDK4 and 6 blockade highlight abemaciclib's unique in-class properties, and could pave new avenues for enhancing its therapeutic efficacy.

Subsequent treatments beyond progression on osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastases

BACKGROUND

Despite the reported efficacy of osimertinib, central nervous system (CNS) progression is still frequent in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to reveal site-specific resistant mechanisms to osimertinib and investigate subsequent treatments for leptomeningeal metastases (LM).

METHODS

EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM who progressed on osimertinib were included. Molecular analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at osimertinib progression was performed. Subsequent treatments of LM were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were identified. Only those with LM as a progression site on osimertinib were included (n=81). In 58 CSF-plasma pairs, more alterations were uniquely detected in CSF (77%) than in plasma (7%). These mechanisms led to 22 patients receiving matched targeted therapy. Among them, 16 (72.7%) had a clinical response. The median overall survival was 7.2 months. For non-matched therapy (n=59), the osimertinib combination had a longer median overall survival than the regimen switch in CNS-only progression (15.3 vs. 7 months, p=0.03). Finally, serial monitoring by CSF revealed the potential evolution of LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Private resistant mechanisms in CSF might match osimertinib-resistant LM for targeted therapy. Besides, continuing osimertinib with intensification strategy might prolong survival, especially for those with CNS-only progression. Prospective  exploration is needed.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Perspectives on Brain Metastases: Moving Toward a Better Outlook for Patients

The diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been a dreaded, end-stage complication of systemic disease. Additionally, with the increasing effectiveness of systemic therapies that prolong life expectancy and improved imaging tools, the incidence of intracranial progression is becoming more common. Within this context, there has been increasing attention directed at understanding the molecular underpinnings of intracranial progression. Exploring the unique features of brain metastases compared with their extracranial counterparts to identify aberrant signaling pathways, which can be targeted pharmacologically, may help lead to new treatments for this patient population. Additionally, critical discoveries outside the sphere of the central nervous system are increasingly being applied to brain metastases with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibition, becoming a prevalent treatment option for patients with brain metastases across multiple histologies. As novel treatment strategies are considered, they require thoughtful incorporation of agents that can cross the blood-brain barrier and can synergize with pre-existing agents through rational combinations. Lastly, as clinicians and scientists continue to understand key molecular features of these tumors, they will continue to influence the treatment algorithms that are developing for the management of these patients. Due to the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with brain metastases, an emerging tool is the utilization of multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor boards to ensure optimal treatment decisions are made and that patients are provided access to applicable clinical trials. Looking to the future, the collective effort to understand the various tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that promote central nervous system seeding and propagation will have the potential to change the clinical trajectory for these patients.

The Genetic Evolution of Metastasis

Cancer is an evolutionary process that is characterized by the emergence of multiple genetically distinct populations or clones within the primary tumor. Intratumor heterogeneity provides a substrate for the selection of adaptive clones, such as those that lead to metastasis. Comparative molecular studies of primary tumors and metastases have identified distinct genomic features associated with the development of metastases. In this review, we discuss how these insights could inform clinical decision-making and uncover rational antimetastasis treatment strategies.

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.

Salvage Treatment for Progressive Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Thirty percent of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, and 15% of patients with the remaining subtypes of breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Available treatment methods include surgery and radiotherapy. However, some individuals will experience intracranial progression despite prior local treatment. This situation remains a challenge. In the case of progressing lesions amenable to local therapy, the choice of a treatment method must consider performance status, cancer burden, possible toxicity, and previously applied therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy rather than whole-brain radiotherapy should be used only if feasible. If local therapy is unfeasible, selected patients, especially those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, may benefit from systemic therapy.

Abstract

Survival of patients with breast cancer has increased in recent years due to the improvement of systemic treatment options. Nevertheless, the occurrence of brain metastases is associated with a poor prognosis. Moreover, most drugs do not penetrate the central nervous system because of the blood–brain barrier. Thus, confirmed intracranial progression after local therapy is especially challenging. The available methods of salvage treatment include surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. This narrative review discusses possible strategies of salvage treatment for progressive brain metastases in breast cancer. It covers possibilities of repeated local treatment using the same method as applied previously, other methods of local therapy, and options of salvage systemic treatment. Repeated local therapy may provide a significant benefit in intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. However, it could lead to significant toxicity. Thus, the choice of optimal methods should be carefully discussed within the multidisciplinary tumor board.

A Need for More Molecular Profiling in Brain Metastases

As local disease control improves, the public health impact of brain metastases (BrM) continues to grow. Molecular features are frequently different between primary and metastatic tumors as a result of clonal evolution during neoplasm migration, selective pressures imposed by systemic treatments, and differences in the local microenvironment. However, biomarker information in BrM is not routinely obtained despite emerging evidence of its clinical value. We review evidence of discordance in clinically actionable biomarkers between primary tumors, extracranial metastases, and BrM. Although BrM biopsy/resection imposes clinical risks, these risks must be weighed against the potential benefits of assessing biomarkers in BrM. First, new treatment targets unique to a patient's BrM may be identified. Second, as BrM may occur late in a patient's disease course, resistance to initial targeted therapies and/or loss of previously identified biomarkers can occur by the time of occult BrM, rendering initial and other targeted therapies ineffective. Thus, current biomarker data can inform real-time treatment options. Third, biomarker information in BrM may provide useful prognostic information for patients. Appreciating the importance of biomarker analyses in BrM tissue, including how it may identify specific drivers of BrM, is critical for the development of more effective treatment strategies to improve outcomes for this growing patient population.

Precision medicine biomarkers in brain metastases: applications, discordances, and obstacles

Brain metastases (BM) present a common cause of mortality and morbidity in several metastatic cancer entities. New therapeutic developments during the last decades, including targeted and immune-related therapies, have shown considerable extra- and intracranial response rates in specific subgroups of BM patients. However, differences in the molecular alteration in the BM tumor tissue compared to extracranial tumors leads to heterogeneous therapeutic responses. Therefore, an accurate molecular analyzation of BM tissue, if possible, has become an essential part in therapeutic decision making in BM patients. The concordance of predictive molecular biomarkers between multiple sites including extracranial and intracranial tumor tissue have been analyzed for some but not all biomarkers routinely applied in modern precision medicine approaches. In the present review, we summarize the current evidence of predictive biomarkers for personalized therapy approaches in the treatment of parenchymal BM.

Detection of Leptomeningeal Disease Using Cell-Free DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid

Importance

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer that is frequently underdiagnosed owing to the low sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytologic assessment, the current benchmark diagnostic method. Improving diagnostic sensitivity may lead to improved treatment decisions.

Objective

To assess whether cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of CSF may be used to diagnose LMD more accurately than cytologic analysis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This diagnostic study conducted in a neuro-oncology clinic at 2 large, tertiary medical centers assessed the use of genomic sequencing of CSF samples obtained from 30 patients with suspected or confirmed LMD from 2015 through 2018 to identify tumor-derived cfDNA. From the same CSF samples, cytologic analyses were conducted, and the results of the 2 tests were compared. This study consisted of 2 patient populations: 22 patients with cytologically confirmed LMD without parenchymal tumors abutting their CSF and 8 patients with parenchymal brain metastases with no evidence of LMD. Patients were considered positive for the presence of LMD if previous CSF cytologic analysis was positive for malignant cells. The analysis was conducted from 2015 to 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA analysis, defined as the number of tests that resulted in correct diagnoses out of the total number of tests assayed. Hypotheses were formed before data collection.

Results

In total, 30 patients (23 women [77%]; median age, 51 years [range, 28-81 years]), primarily presenting with metastatic solid malignant neoplasms, participated in this study. For 48 follow-up samples from patients previously diagnosed via cytologic analysis as having LMD with no parenchymal tumor abutting CSF, cfDNA findings were accurate in the assessment of LMD in 45 samples (94%; 95% CI, 83%-99%), whereas cytologic analysis was accurate in 36 samples (75%; 95% CI, 60%-86%), a significant difference (P = .02). Of 43 LMD-positive samples, CSF cfDNA analysis was sensitive to LMD in 40 samples (93%; 95% CI, 81%-99%), and cytologic analysis was sensitive to LMD in 31 samples (72%; 95% CI, 56%-85%), a significant difference (P = .02). For 3 patients with parenchymal brain metastases abutting the CSF and no suspicion of LMD, cytologic findings were negative for LMD in all 3 patients, whereas cfDNA findings were positive in all 3 patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

This diagnostic study found improved sensitivity and accuracy of cfDNA CSF testing vs cytologic assessment for diagnosing LMD with the exception of parenchymal tumors abutting CSF, suggesting improved ability to diagnosis LMD. Consideration of incorporating CSF cfDNA analysis into clinical care is warranted.

Leptomeningeal Metastases from Solid Tumors: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Molecular Approaches

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.