A review of dental treatment of head and neck cancer patients, before, during and after radiotherapy: part 1

Assessing oral and dental health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients at 1, 5, and 10 years: a comparison of the EORTC QLQ43, FACT H&N, and the Orthognathic-QLQ questionnaires

PURPOSE

Numerous health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires are available to assess oral HRQoL in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck (H&N) cancer. These multidimensional instruments should have the capacity to detect meaningful clinical oral function/dental changes at different time points. However, the optimal instrument-or combination of instruments-for assessing oral health and dental needs is not clear. We administered three questionnaires (FACT H&N, EORTC QLQ-H&N43, Orthognathic-QLQ) to assess oral and dental HRQoL in a cohort of H&N cancer patients at 1-, 5- and 10-year post-treatment. A secondary aim was to compare these questionnaires to determine which provides the most useful assessment of oral HRQoL and dental care needs.

METHODS

Prospective, single-center study of patients (n = 82) with H&N cancer grouped according to the follow-up time (1, 5, or 10 years). HRQoL was assessed by telephone with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT H&N), the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC QLQ-H&N43), and the Orthognathic Questionnaire (OQLQ). Analyses were performed to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (fifty-nine men) were included. The mean age was 61.9 years. On the EORTC QLQ-H&N43, significant between-group differences (1 year vs. 5 and 10 years) were observed on five multi-item scales (mouth pain, senses, body image, anxiety, and shoulder problems) and on three single-item scales (neurological problems, neck swelling, and weight loss), indicating that QoL for those domains was more negatively impacted at 1-year post-treatment. Adjusted mean scores on most items on the EORTC QLQ-H&N43 were similar in the 5- and 10-year groups. On the other two scales (FACT H&N and OQLG), there were no significant between-group (1, 5, 10 years) differences in adjusted mean scores.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the negative impact of H&N cancer on HRQoL is most evident at 1-year versus 5- or 10-year post-treatment. The combined administration of the EORTC QLQ-H&N43 and the OQLQ appear to provide the most useful assessment of HRQoL.

Zirconia Implants Indicated Better Stability After Exposure to Radioiodine-131 Therapy Used for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Background: Advancements in therapeutic approaches and standard medical interventions have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. However, uncertainties remain regarding the optimal timing and protocols for dental implant placement in patients undergoing radioiodine-131 (I-131) therapy. Debates continue about the potential effects of radiation on osseointegration dynamics and implant viability. This in vitro study assessed the impact of radiodiodine-131 (I-131) used for differentiated thyroid cancer on the structure of zirconia and titanium implants. Methods: A total of 60 implants were utilized, with distribution into two cohorts: titanium implants (Ti, n = 30) and zirconia implants (Zr, n = 30). Subsequently, the Ti and Zr implants were immersed in I-131 solution and retrieved at specified time intervals: 0, 6, 12, 24, 48 h, and 8 days post irradiation. The analyses used to characterize the structure of the implants were radioactivity, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, roughness, and Vickers hardness assessment. Results: The findings indicate that the zirconia implants exhibited minimal ultra-structural topographic changes after irradiation. Notable topographical changes and debris deposition on zirconia surfaces became evident after 24 h, with cumulative effects observed after 192 h. The titanium implants, on the other hand, showed surface alterations beginning at 12 h of exposure. Significant changes, including erosive patterns and substantial debris deposits, occurred after 48 and 192 h, leading to increased surface roughness by 24 h. Implants exposed for 12 and 24 h formed a statistically significant group, indicating the onset of surface alteration accumulation. The erosion debris confirmed the surface alterations induced by radioiodine-131 exposure. Conclusions: Overall, the Zr implants demonstrated greater stability compared to the Ti implants following radioiodine-131 exposure.

Prevention of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Osteoradionecrosis is a long-term, serious side effect of head and neck radiation therapy and is associated with significant morbidity and quality of life issues.

METHODS

This paper sought to determine consensus on the prevention and management of osteoradionecrosis by an international panel of multidisciplinary professionals expert in the management of patients with head and neck cancer using a Delphi methodology. Unique to this work is our direct inclusion of the views of patients and carers in our findings.

RESULTS

This study reached consensus on the importance of pre and post oral health assessment and education for patients with head and neck cancer. This was also noted by the patients and carers who took part in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This work highlights the need for a standardized oral health assessment tool and multidisciplinary care of patients to prevent and manage osteoradionecrosis.

The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

In Denmark, the prevalence of head and neck cancer is approximately 17.000, and the incidence is increasing. The disease and treatment of this condition may lead to severe physical, psychological, and social consequences. However, the literature indicates a lack of rehabilitation services and insufficient professional resources in the municipal setting resulting in unmet rehabilitation needs. The aim of this study is to gain an understanding of the challenges and rehabilitation needs experienced by citizens treated for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was employed. Paul Ricoeur's interpretation theory was used to analyze the data.

FINDINGS

Citizens treated for head and neck cancer experience the need for targeted assistance to manage the consequences following treatment for head and neck cancer and the need for adequate information and specialized professional competencies in municipal rehabilitation. The findings highlight a dual need: support from healthcare professionals and opportunities for patients to connect with others who have undergone treatment for head and neck cancer, as part of municipal rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

The study contributes to an understanding of the citizen perspective on rehabilitation needs and informs and enhances knowledge about municipal rehabilitation interventions for citizens treated for head and neck cancer. However, the findings also indicate the complexity of the referral process, highlighting the need for further research on barriers and facilitators to referral and access to municipal rehabilitation.

The EORTC QLQ43 and FACT H&N questionnaires of quality of life at 1 and 5 years after treatment and dental care in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in head and neck cancer patients at 1 and 5 years after successful treatment of their tumors, and to explore the usefulness of 2 instruments for assessing the need of dental care services.

METHODS

This cross-sectional pilot study included 20 adult patients with head and neck cancer who completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT H&N) Symptom Index and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-H&N43) after 1 and 5 years of treatment.

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation, SD) scores of the FACT H&N Symptom Index were higher (better HRQoL) at 5 years than at 1 year (24.1 [4.4] vs. 21.1 [6.4]; p = 0.236). Only three of the ten items of FACT H&N (swallow, pain in mouth/throat or neck, and solid foods) evaluated oral health. In the EORTC QLQ-H&N43 questionnaire, scores were lower at 5 years (better HRQoL) in almost all multi- and single-item symptoms. This questionnaire includes four multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, social eating, swallowing, and problems with teeth) measuring dental and orthodontic needs.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL in patients with head and neck cancer improved with the length of follow-up. The EORTC QLQ-H&N43 has more items addressing oral health compared to the FACT H&N Symptom Index and may be more adequate to assess the need of dental therapy in clinical practice.

Wettability of saliva substitutes across various denture base fabrication techniques

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the contact angles (CAs) of four denture base materials subjected to different surface treatments using deionized water and saliva substitutes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 32 rectangular specimens were manufactured using four different denture base materials: heat-cured compression molded Lucitone 199 (C), milled Lucitone 199 (M), Formlabs Denture Base RP (P), and SR Ivocap High Impact (I). The CA of the surface of the unaltered, mechanically polished, and sandblasted surface specimens was evaluated after the application of five saliva substitutes: Biotene, VEGA, Spry, Moi-Stir, Dentilube, and ionized water. Ten droplet measurements were obtained for each group, with each droplet analyzed for advancing contact angle (ACA), receding contact angle (RCA), and the contact angle hysteresis (CAH) was calculated. The data of the experiment was analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, (α = 0.05) with Tukey's test.

RESULTS

CAH was demonstrated to have statistically significant differences among the denture bases (p < 0.05), with unaltered 3D printed exhibiting the largest CAH, followed by unaltered milled. The unaltered denture bases exhibited higher CAH than the polished, and there were no significant differences in CAH among the polished denture bases (p > 0.05). Sandblasting increased the ACA of the milled and conventional bases. The saliva substitutes exhibited differences in ACA, with Spry and VEGA having the highest ACA, and Biotene had the lowest CA of all the saliva substitutes evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The manufacturing methods of denture bases influences the CAH, while the chemical composition of the denture base specimens does not appear to affect CAH. Sandblasting increases the ACA for the milled and conventional groups. Saliva substitutes do impact the ACA. Drawing from previous research, it is hypothesized that a 3D-printed denture base or sandblasting a milled denture base may offer greater resistance to dislodgement.

Design and evaluation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of maxillary and mandibular substructures using a 3D U-Net

Background

Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.

Materials and methods

The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).

Results

Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.

Conclusions

The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.

Osteoradionecrosis - an old problem with new consequences

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a devasting complication of radiation therapy (RT), especially in head and neck cancers (HNC), and is still poorly understood. The aim of this review is to report its incidence and consider the risk factors associated with ORN to highlight prevention strategies to decrease its incidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

The average incidence of ORN is between 2% and 23%, with incidence decreasing in more recent years with the introduction of modern RT technology and better oral health care. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers, pre- and post-RT dental extractions and a total radiation dose of over 60 Gy were all identified as risk factors for ORN. In prevention, strategies were mainly structured around minimising risk factors or targeting possible mechanisms of ORN's pathophysiology.

SUMMARY

At present, the controversy surrounding the risk factors and pathogenesis of ORN makes it difficult to establish a set of prevention guidelines for its incidence. In order to achieve this, more research examining its aetiology must be conducted as well as a universal staging system within which ORN may be classified.

A scoping assessment of dental services at designated head and neck cancer centres in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Dentists serve a crucial role in managing treatment complications for patients with head and neck cancer, including post-radiation caries and oral infection. To date, dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario, Canada have not been well characterized and considerable disparities in allocation, availability, and funding are thought to exist. The current study aims to describe and assess the provision of dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario.

METHODS

A mixed methods scoping assessment was conducted. A purposive sample of dentist-in-chiefs at each of Ontario's 9 designated head and neck cancer centres (tertiary centres which meet provincially-set quality and safety standards) was invited to participate. Participants completed a 36-item online survey and 60-minute semi-structured interview which explored perceptions of dental services for head and neck cancer patients at their respective centres, including strengths, gaps, and inequities. If a centre did not have a dentist-in-chief, an alternative stakeholder who was knowledgeable on that centre's dental services participated instead. Thematic analysis of the interview data was completed using a mixed deductive-inductive approach.

RESULTS

Survey questionnaires were completed at 7 of 9 designated centres. A publicly funded dental clinic was present at 5 centres, but only 2 centres provided automatic dental assessment for all patients. Survey data from 2 centres were not captured due to these centres' lack of active dental services. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 9 of 9 designated centres and elicited 3 themes: (1) lack of financial resources; (2) heterogeneity in dentistry care provision; and (3) gaps in the continuity of care. Participants noted concerning under-resourcing and limitations/restrictions in funding for dental services across Ontario, resulting in worse health outcomes for vulnerable patients. Extensive advocacy efforts by champions of dental services who have sought to mitigate current disparities in dentistry care were also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Inequities exist in the provision of dental services for head and neck cancer patients in Ontario. Data from the current study will broaden the foundation for evidence-based decision-making on the allocation and funding of dental services by government health care agencies.

Compliance with oral hygiene and dietary advice for the prevention of post-radiotherapy dental disease among head and neck cancer patients - a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To elicit head and neck cancer (HANC) patients' views about their oral health and to identify potential issues regarding compliance with clinical oral hygiene and dietary advice for the prevention of post-radiotherapy dental disease.

METHODS

A purposive sample of twelve HANC patients between 6- and 12-months post-radiotherapy were recruited to undergo a semi-structured interview with a qualitative researcher. A pre-piloted topic guide was used to frame each interview. Qualitative data were analysed via thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Data were categorised into four main themes - 'How HANC patients perceive oral health', 'Cancer diagnosis and cancer care pathway', 'Impact of oncology treatment (radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy)', and 'Post-oncology treatment recovery', with 14 subthemes. Oral health was viewed as an important component of HANC patients' overall physical and mental health post-treatment. Patients' non-compliance with adequate oral hygiene practice was related to oral mucositis, a "burning" sensation associated with high fluoride toothpaste, forgotten or inconsistent clinical advice, and an inadequate supply of preventive oral hygiene products. The potentially highly cariogenic nature of prescribed nutritional supplements for patients at risk of malnutrition did not tend to be communicated to patients in advance of their prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate oral health is essential for the overall physical and mental well-being of post-treatment HANC patients. Non-compliance with preventive clinical advice increases the risk of post-treatment oral health deterioration and was related to miscommunication, inadequate supplies of oral hygiene products, and treatment-related oral discomfort.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Post-treatment HANC patients are at increased risk of dental disease. Educational and behavioural techniques should be employed to enhance patients' compliance with clinical oral hygiene and dietary advice for the prevention of post-radiotherapy dental disease. Patients should be informed about the potentially highly cariogenic nature of nutritional supplements, and these patients should undergo frequent dental recall. Clinical advice regarding oral hygiene and dietary practices needs to be given consistently to HANC patients by different specialists of the HANC multidisciplinary team.

Utility of pre-chemoradiotherapy Pan-Immune-Inflammation-Value for predicting the osteoradionecrosis rates in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancers

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to explore whether pretreatment Pan-Immune-Inflammation-Value (PIV) measurements might predict the risk of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC).

METHODS

The platelet, monocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts acquired on the first day of CCRT were used to compute pretreatment PIV levels: PIV = (Platelets × Monocytes × Neutrophils) ÷ Lymphocytes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the association between ORN rates and PIV levels. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the probable intergroup correlations. The potential link between the pretreatment PIV levels and the post-treatment ORN rates was determined as the primary objective.

RESULTS

21 (10.0%) of 210 eligible patients were diagnosed with ORN. The optimal pre-CCRT PIV cutoff was 833, which separated patients into two PIV groups with divergent ORN prevalence estimates: Group 1: PIV < 833 (N = 153), and Group 2: PIV ≥ 833 (N = 57). The comparison analysis found that the PIV ≥ 833 cohort had significantly higher ORN rates than the PIV < 833 cohort (29.8% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.001). Other characteristics linked to significantly higher ORN rates were the patient's continuing smoking, the use of the Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy technique, the mean mandibular dose of ≥ 58.1 Gy, the number of tooth extractions before CCRT ≥ 4, and the presence of tooth extractions after CCRT. The independent importance of all factors on higher ORN occurrence rates were retained in multivariate analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed a strong link between aggravated inflammatory response and ORN genesis, with high pretreatment PIV levels related to significantly higher ORN rates.

Effect of the timing of radiation therapy on the push-out strength of resin cement to root dentine

This study investigated the effect of radiation timing on the bond strength of resin cement to intraradicular dentine. Fifty human teeth were distributed into 5 groups (n = 10): Control (nonirradiated teeth), Before-RCT (teeth irradiated before root canal treatment), After-CH (teeth irradiated after canal preparation and placement of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing), After-RCT (teeth irradiated after completion of root canal treatment) and After-FPL (teeth irradiated after luting of a glass fibre post). Each tooth received 70 Gy irradiation. The roots were sectioned for push-out strength testing. After-RCT and After-FPL groups had significantly lower push-out strength than the control at the middle third (p < 0.05). Control and After-CH groups had a higher percentage of cohesive dentine failure. Radiotherapy after root canal obturation and post luting adversely affected the adhesiveness of resin cement to intraradicular dentine. Teeth irradiated before root canal treatment and after placement of calcium hydroxide had the best performance.

Dental considerations for head and neck cancer: A clinical review

Introduction

Radiotherapy is one of the treatment modalities for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). However, it leads to the development of chronic and acute side effects. These side effects impact negatively on the patient's quality of life and oral functioning. This clinical review aims to provide basic information about HNC, understand the impact of radiotherapy on oral health, and explain the role of dental care providers for HNC patients during the pre-and post-radiotherapy time.

Materials and Methods

Electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar) were searched using defined keywords. The main inclusion criteria were any studies describing "dental management of patients with head and neck cancer" and "dental management of patients treated with radiotherapy."

Results

Thematic analysis was used to summaries the findings of the included studies (n = 102) into main headings and subheadings. All studies were published between 1970 and 2023.

Conclusion

The number of HNC patients is increasing. This necessitates the need for raising the awareness of dental care providers to the side-effects of HNC therapy which includes treatment with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or surgery. Dental care providers should understand the common side-effects and their treatments besides their role in the pre- (i.e., dental extraction of teeth with poor prognosis and maintaining good oral hygiene) and post- (i.e., oral rehabilitation and post-HNC dental care) radiotherapy dental care.

Pre-chemoradiotherapy low hemoglobin levels indicate increased osteoradionecrosis risk in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) levels can predict the risk of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

METHODS

ORN cases were identified from the records of LA-NPCs who had oral exams before and after CCRT. All Hb measurements were obtained on the first day of treatment. Receiving operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the relationship between Hb levels and ORN rates. The relationship between pretreatment Hb levels and ORN rates served as the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints included the discovery of additional potential ORN risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 263 eligible LA-NPCs, we identified 8.7% ORN cases. The ideal cutoff Hb before CCRT was 10.6 g/dL. It was revealed that HPR ≤ 10.6 group had a significantly higher ORN rate (32.5% vs. 1.5% for Hb > 10.6; P < 0.001). The mandibular V59.8 ≥ 36% Gy, pre-CCRT ≥ 4 tooth extractions, the presence of post-CCRT tooth extractions, and the time of post-CCRT tooth extractions > 8 months were the other factors associated with significantly increased ORN rates (P < 0.05 for each).

CONCLUSION

Low pre-CCRT Hb levels appeared to be independently linked to significantly higher ORN rates. Pretreatment Hb levels may be used to establish preventive measures and predict ORN.

The predictive value of pretreatment hemoglobin-to-platelet ratio on osteoradionecrosis incidence rates of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients managed with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether the pretreatment hemoglobin-to-platelet ratio (HPR) could predict the risk of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

METHODS

ORN cases were reported from the records of LA-NPC patients who had oral examinations before and after C-CRT. The pretreatment HPR values were calculated on the first day of C-CRT. The connection between HPR values and ORN occurrences was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The primary endpoint was the relationship between the pretreatment HPR values and post-C-CRT ORN incidence rates, while secondary endpoints included the identification of other putative ORN risk factors.

RESULTS

We distinguished 10.9% incidences of ORN during the post-C-CRT follow-up period among 193 LA-NPC patients. The optimal cutoff for pre-C-CRT HPR was 0.48 that grouped the patients into two HPR groups with fundamentally different post-C-CRT ORN incidence rates: Group 1: HPR ≤ 0.48 (N = 60), and Group 2: HPR > 0.48 (N = 133). The comparative analysis indicated a significantly higher ORN incidence in HPR ≤ 0.48 group (30%; P < 0.001). The other factors associated with meaningfully increased ORN rates included the presence of pre-C-CRT ≥ 5 teeth extractions, mandibular volume receiving ≥ 64 Gy, post-C-CRT tooth extractions, mean mandibular dose ≥ 50.6 Gy, and C-CRT to tooth extraction interval > 5.5 months.

CONCLUSION

Low pretreatment HPR levels were independently and unequivocally linked to significantly increased incidence of ORN post-C-CRT. Pre-C-CRT HPR levels may be used to estimate the incidence of ORN and be useful for taking preventive and therapeutic measures in these patients such as monitoring oral hygiene with strict follow-up, avoidance of unnecessary tooth extractions, particularly after C-CRT, and use of more rigorous mandibular RT dose limits.

Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Nutritional Status of Polish Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a global epidemiological and clinical problem. In 2020, it was the seventh most common type of cancer worldwide. In 2019, HNC was the fourth most common cause of cancer death among men in Poland. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with HNC at all clinical stages. However, it is associated with a significant rate of early and late adverse effects. As head and neck cancers are located close to vital anatomical structures, both the local progression of the disease and the treatments used can cause serious problems for patients with HNC, reducing their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as well as increasing the risk of depressive disorders. Despite this, the current literature lacks research on these aspects of the therapeutic process in the Polish population. The aim of this study was to assess the early impact of radiotherapy on HRQoL outcomes, psychological distress, nutritional status, and overall performance of patients with HNC.

METHODS

The study was carried out among 85 patients with HNC treated in the Inpatient Radiotherapy Unit of the Radiotherapy Department of the Lower Silesian Oncology Center in Wrocław. The patients were asked to complete a set of questionnaires, including the EORTC QLQ-H&N35, the BDI, the NRS-2002, and the ECOG scale, at two time points: before the initiation of radiotherapy treatment and after a course of radiotherapy. The period between the assessments was 7 to 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrated a negative impact of radiotherapy on scores in all the cancer-specific symptom and functioning scales used in the study. As regards functioning scales, the largest differences were observed for senses and swallowing, whereas with symptoms scales, the largest differences were noted for "sticky saliva" and "dry mouth". Over half of the patients included in the study required nutritional support after radiotherapy treatment. We found statistically significant differences in the levels of depressive symptom severity before and after radiotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed significant changes in the physical and psychological functioning and nutritional status of the patients with HNC studied after radiotherapy treatment, which may have an impact on the effectiveness of cancer treatment.

Dental Care in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

External beam radiotherapy is an integral part of the management of head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer lead to many treatment-related toxicities, including a wide range of dental morbidities. These complications depend on the various patient and treatment-related factors. Patients with poor oral hygiene, pre-existing periodontal disease, and the conventional mode of radiotherapy delivery are major factors leading to acute and severe late dental problems. Most of the complications are preventable with proper oral and dental care before, during and after radiotherapy. Pre radiotherapy dental evaluation to diagnose patients with potential risk and timely intervention can reduce long-term morbidities like carries, osteoradionecrosis, etc., thereby improving patients' quality of life. This article highlights the various aspects of dental care and management in head neck cancer patients before, during and after radiation therapy.

Efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy on healing of ionizing irradiated bone: a systematic review of in vivo animal studies

This systematic review aimed to answer the research focused question: What are the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on bone healing after ionizing irradiation in animal models? The EMBASE, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, including gray literature, were searched using the following keywords: "Head and Neck Neoplasms"; "Ionizing Radiation"; "Low-Level Light Therapy"; and "Bone regeneration", focusing on the primary studies that assessed the effects of PBM therapy on animal models of irradiated bone. Six studies have met the eligibility criteria and presented an overall regular quality according to the risk of bias assessment tools. All the studies utilized rat animal model and near-infrared laser PBM at low power output setting. Most of the studies showed increased new bone formation, osteocytes, osteoblasts, and vascularization networking, as a result of PBM therapy. However, only one out of the six studies has not shown any differences in bone healing in both lased and non-lased animal groups. Nevertheless, PBM therapy is a potential tool to improve bone healing induced by ionizing radiation. However, due to the scarce number of studies and the great variability of laser parameters and treatment protocols, a clear conclusion cannot be drawn. Hence, extensive preclinical in vivo studies are warranted to ensure these beneficial effects have been addressed prior to translational clinical trials.

Assessment of the effects of different dental restorative materials on radiotherapy dose distribution: A phantom study

Background

One of the most specific effects of high-density dental restorative materials on head & neck cancer radiotherapy is generating variations on isodose distributions. These variations might have an impact on the accuracy and effectiveness of the radiation treatment. The aim of this study is investigating the possible dosimetric effect of six different restorative materials on isodose distributions in head & neck radiotherapy planning process.

Materials and Methods

A special phantom was developed and twenty-one caries-free human third molars (a control group + six different restorative materials) were used for the measurements. After acquiring the computed tomography (CT) images, seven treatment plans were created. Hounsfield Unit (HU) numbers, horizontal line dose profile (HLDP) and vertical line dose profiles (VLDPs) were compared with the control group.

Results

The amalgam sample deformed the HU numbers in CT images. The median HU value for the S4 material was considerably different than the other samples. The median values were quite close for the remaining samples. For the amalgam sample, the mean of the calculated median isodose values for HLDP and VLDP at 3.5 cm away from the isocenter line were lower than the mean of the control group 4.03% and 6.94%, respectively (for HLDP with tooth numbers of 36 and 38 P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively; for VLDP P < 0.001). In C-S1 comparison results, the statistically significant differences were found for the measurement point at 1 cm away from the isocenter (P = 0.037, P = 0.002, and P = 0.018 for the tooth numbers 36, 37, and 38, respectively). In C-S2 and C-S6 comparisons, there was a statistically significant difference for tooth number 36 (P = 0.035 and P = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

The findings of the present study showed that amalgam should not be used in head & neck cancer patients who are planned to have radiation therapy. A high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) and a ceramic reinforced GIC sample can be used instead of amalgam to minimize the distorting effect on isodose distributions.

Conservative orthodontic treatment for severe pathologic migration following total glossectomy: A case report

Glossectomy combined with radiotherapy causes different levels of tongue function disorders and leads to severe malocclusion, with poor periodontal status in cancer survivors. Although affected patients require regular access to orthodontic care, special considerations are crucial for treatment planning. This case report describes the satisfactory orthodontic management for the correction of severe dental crowding in a 43-year-old female 6 years after treatment for tongue cancer with total glossectomy combined with radiotherapy, to envision the possibility of orthodontic care for oral cancer survivors. Extraction was performed to correct dental crowding and establish proper occlusion following alignment, after considering the possibility of osteoradionecrosis. Orthodontic mini-implants were used to provide skeletal anchorage required for closure of the extraction space and intrusion of the anterior teeth. The dental crowding was corrected, and Class I occlusal relationship was established after 36 months of treatment. The treatment outcome was sustained after 15 months of retention, and long-term follow-up was recommended.

Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Background

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to dental structures in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without dental dose constraints, compare the dosimetry differences of dental structures between the two radiation techniques, and determine whether dental structures should be one of the organs at risk for IMRT and VMAT plans according to the dosimetric analysis.

Materials and Methods

A total of 138 head and neck cancer patients (nasopharyngeal, oral cavity, pharyngeal, hypopharynx, and larynx), who underwent IMRT (69 patients) or VMAT (69 patients) from March 2016 to March 2021 in our hospital, were included to assess the dosimetry difference between two radiotherapy techniques for dental structures.

Results

The radiation dose delivered by IMRT and the mean maximum doses delivered by VMAT to the maxillary teeth of nasopharyngeal cancer patients were significantly higher than the dose received by the mandibular teeth. In contrast, the mandibular teeth of oral cavity cancer, oropharynx cancer, and laryngeal cancer received higher radiation doses than maxillary teeth. Except for mandibular teeth of oral cancer patients, the molars received significantly high-dose radiation than premolars and/or incisors in both radiotherapy techniques. No significant difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT in the dosimetric comparison of dental structures, except that oral cavity cancer patients treated with VMAT received a significantly higher mean average dose than those treated with IMRT. When PTV included level Ib, the radiation doses of the mandibular teeth delivered by both radiotherapy techniques were significantly higher than that in PTV when level Ib was excluded.

Conclusion

Without dental dose constraints, no major difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT plans in tooth dose distribution. We suggest that dental structures should be delineated as part of the organ at risk (OAR) when IMRT and VMAT are planned. Meanwhile, attention should be paid to dental structures that might have a high-dose area according to the specific tumor location.

Chemical analysis of irradiated root dentin and its interaction with resin cements

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the chemical changes in root dentin submitted to ionizing radiation and how it affects the interaction with resin cements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty human premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20): non-irradiated and irradiated. They were randomly subdivided according to the type of resin cement (n = 10): conventional (RelyX ARC, 3 M ESPE) or self-adhesive (RelyX U200, 3 M ESPE). After cementation of the fiberglass posts, the roots were sectioned to be analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The data obtained from FTIR and Raman were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed Tukey's test (α = 0.05). For CLSM, a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In the FTIR, there was a significant difference between the non-irradiated and irradiated groups for phosphate (p = 0.011), carbonate (p < 0.001), amide III (p = 0.038), and carbonate/mineral ratio (p < 0.001). Regarding the root third, there was a difference for amide I (p = 0.002), mineral/matrix ratio (p = 0.001), and amide I/CH₂ (p = 0.026) between the cervical and the others. Raman spectroscopy revealed no difference between groups for 961/1458 cm^-1 in the diffusion zone. CLSM showed a different interaction pattern for the two cements with the irradiated dentin from the cervical third.

CONCLUSIONS

Ionizing radiation altered the chemical composition of root dentin, especially in the cervical third. The resin cements showed less interaction with the irradiated root dentin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As radiotherapy alters the chemical composition of root dentin, the interaction of resin cement with dentin can compromise the success of rehabilitation with fiberglass posts.

Delays in Time to Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: A South Australian Perspective

Background and Objectives: In head and neck cancer, delays in time to treatment are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Within Australia, it is recommended that primary treatment is initiated within 56 days of initial referral. The aim of this study was to assess whether head and neck cancer treatment was delivered within these timeframe guidelines at our institution and identify factors associated with treatment delays. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer over a 24 months period (2018 to 2019) at Flinders Medical Centre, Australia. Time to treatment intervals were calculated for comparison to local timeframe guidelines. Results: A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median time from specialist referral to treatment initiation was 45.5 days (IQR 29–61), with 72% meeting the 56 days guideline. On univariate logistic regression, patients undergoing primary radiotherapy treatment were less likely to meet this guideline than those undergoing primary surgery (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.6–28.9, p < 0.001), as were those requiring prophylactic gastrostomy tube insertion (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–9.0, p < 0.05). Treatment initiation beyond 56 days had no significant impact on 12 months overall survival or disease-free survival. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that primary radiotherapy treatment is associated with delays in head and neck cancer treatment initiation, likely related to time consuming pre-treatment factors such as gastrostomy tube insertion.

Oncologists' Perspective on Dental Care Around the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pattern of Practice Survey

PURPOSE

Patients with head and neck cancer are at risk of long-term dental complications. Proper dental assessment pre- and post-treatment can improve outcomes but is logistically challenging. We surveyed oncologists to better understand their perspectives surrounding dental care in this unique population.

METHODS

We surveyed oncologists at institutions associated with an ongoing national study of oral health after treatment of head and neck cancer. Seventeen questions were used to assess provider characteristics, patterns of practice, patterns of referral, barriers to referral, and willingness to apply fluoride varnish in the oncology clinic.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven oncologists were invited from six institutions, of whom 40 (41%) responded. Surgeons represented 45% of the sample, followed by radiation oncologists (40%) and medical oncologists (15%). Both generalists and subspecialists were included. All practiced in a metropolitan area with an academic dental practice, and many felt that this improved access to care. Despite this, most oncologists thought that financial factors were a significant barrier to obtaining timely dental care. Most oncologists performed a dental assessment during visits. Oncologists felt qualified to identify the most significant complications of treatment, such as exposed bone, but felt underqualified to identify early changes in need of intervention. When asked if the oncology clinic could apply fluoride varnish during follow-ups, most stated that this seemed feasible but would require education and financial support.

CONCLUSION

Oncologists often perform limited dental evaluations during their routine visits. Given the challenges associated with access to proper dental care for this population, these oncology visits may provide a window for preventative intervention.

Oral microbiota transplantation fights against head and neck radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in mice

Oral mucositis is a common radiotherapy-induced complication among nasal, oral and laryngeal cancer (NOALC) patients. This complication leads to decreased quality of life and has few treatments. Here, fractionated radiation was performed to mimic radiotherapy for NOALCs in mouse models. Oral microbiota transplantation (OMT) mitigated oral mucositis, as judged by reconstructed epithelium and tongue papillae, fewer infiltrated leukocytes and more proliferative cells in the oral epithelium. The gut microbiota impacted oral mucositis progression, and OMT restructured oral and gut bacteria configurations and reprogrammed the gene expression profile of tongue tissues. In vivo silencing of glossal S100 calcium binding protein A9 debilitated the radioprotection of OMT. In light of clinical samples, we identified that patients with different alteration trends of Lactobacillaceae frequency presented different primary lesions and prognoses of NOALC following radiotherapy. Together, our findings provide new insights into the oral-gut microbiota axis and underpin the suggestion that OMT might be harnessed as a novel remedy to fight against oral mucositis in NOALC patients following radiotherapy in preclinical settings. Of note, oral microorganisms, such as Lactobacillaceae, might be employed as biomarkers to predict the prognosis of NOALC with radiotherapy.

Pretreatment Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predict Needs for Teeth Extractions for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the utility of pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in predicting the teeth caries and need for tooth extraction after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) for locally advanced squamous-cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC) patients.

METHODS

The records of LA-SCHNC patients who underwent formal dental evaluations at pre- and post-C-CRT periods were retrospectively analyzed. The pretreatment SII values were calculated using the platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte measures acquired on the first day of C-CRT: SII=Platelets×neutrophils/lymphocytes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to identify the ideal pre-C-CRT SII cutoff that may predict the teeth caries and the need for tooth extraction after the C-CRT. The primary endpoint was the link between the pre-C-CRT SII and the need for tooth extraction during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A sum of 126 patients were included. Median follow-up was 4.9 years (range: 2.7-7.8). Nasopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers comprised the majority (75.4%) study cohort. Post-treatment teeth extractions were reported in 62.7% patients. The optimal cutoff was 558 [Area under the curve (AUC): %76.8 sensitivity: 72.3%; and specificity: 70.9%] that grouped the patients into two subgroups with significantly different post-C-CRT tooth extraction rates: Group 1: SII≤558 (n = 70) and SII>558 (n = 56), respectively. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between the pretreatment SII and the tooth extraction rates after the C-CRT (rs:0.89: P = 0.001). The comparative analysis displayed that the teeth extractions rates were significantly higher in the SII>558 group (77.1% versus 51.4% for SII≤558; Hazard ratio: 1.68; P = 0.001). Further analyses showed that the pre-C-CRT SII>558 was the unique factor associated with meaningfully higher necessities for post-C-CRT teeth extractions.

CONCLUSION

The present outcomes intimated that high pretreatment SII levels were linked to significantly increased post-treatment teeth extractions in LA-SCHNC patients undergoing definitive C-CRT.

Effects of radiation therapy on the dislocation resistance of root canal sealers applied to dentin and the sealer-dentin interface: a pilot study

Objectives

This study evaluated and compared the effects of radiation therapy on the dislocation resistance of AH Plus and BioRoot RCS applied to dentin and the sealer-dentin interface.

Materials and Methods

Thirty single-rooted teeth were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 15 each): AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey) and BioRoot RCS (Septodont). Each group was subdivided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group was subjected to a total radiation dose of 60 Gy. The root canals of all samples were cleaned, shaped, and obturated using the single-cone technique. Dentin slices (1 mm) were sectioned from each root third for the push-out test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was done to examine the sealer-dentin interface. The failure mode was determined using stereomicroscopy. Bond strength data were analyzed by the independent t-test, 1-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results

Significantly lower bond strength was observed in irradiated teeth than non-irradiated teeth in the AH Plus group (p < 0.05). The BioRoot RCS group showed no significant reduction in bond strength after irradiation (p > 0.05) and showed a higher post-irradiation bond strength (209.92 ± 172.26 MPa) than the AH Plus group. SEM revealed slightly larger gap-containing regions in irradiated specimens from both groups.

Conclusions

The dislocation resistance of BioRoot RCS was not significantly changed by irradiation and was higher than that of AH Plus. BioRoot RCS may be the sealer of choice for root canal treatment in patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Safety protocols for dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of a Brazilian hospital service

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been prioritized in relation to other illnesses considered critical, such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases/stroke, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases. The management of patients with these diseases involves dental care to reduce systemic complications caused by odontogenic infections, and/or to treat oral manifestations of systemic comorbidities. In this regard, the dental care of these individuals must be guaranteed during the pandemic. Although a high risk of exposure to and catching of COVID-19 is expected to befall dental professionals, biosafety guidelines reduce the likelihood of infection. Thus, the current scenario poses challenges, and offers decision-making approaches and tools that facilitate the management of individuals with oral manifestations of chronic and/or critical diseases, using hospital-based services. This article presents an overview for hospital service providers who are at the forefront of COVID-19 care, including a secure protocol, and clinical guidelines based on the experience of the Hospital das Clínicas in Belo Horizonte, a public referral service, supported by the Brazilian National Health System.

Effects of fractionation and ionizing radiation dose on the chemical composition and microhardness of enamel

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the chemical and mechanical properties of enamel submitted to different in vitro radiation protocols.

DESIGN

Third molars were divided into seven groups (n = 8): non-irradiated (NI); a single dose of 30 Gy (SD30), 50 Gy (SD50), or 70 Gy (SD70) of radiation; or fractional radiation doses of up to 30 Gy (FD30), 50 Gy (FD50), or 70 Gy (FD70). Hemisections were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Knoop microhardness (KHN) test. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test compared the test groups with the NI. Two-way ANOVA was performed for the fractionation and radiation dose, followed by Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

FTIR revealed differences for the amide I band between the NI and FD50 and NI and FD70 groups (p < 0.001). For the organic matrix/mineral ratio, the FD70 group presented a lower ratio compared to NI (p = 0.009). Excluding the NI group, there were differences between the FD30 and FD50 (p = 0.045) and the FD30 and FD70 groups (p < 0.001). For EDS, there were differences for Ca (p = 0.011) and Ca/P (p < 0.001), with the FD70 group presenting lower values compared to NI (p = 0.015; p < 0.001). For KHN, the FD70 group presented lower values than the NI (p = 0.002). Two-way ANOVA showed difference for the dose (p < 0.001), with the 70 Gy group presenting a lower KHN value within the fractionated groups.

CONCLUSION

Fractional doses 70 Gy irradiation caused chemical and mechanical changes to enamel. Radiation applied in single or fractional doses produced different effects to enamel.

Health-related quality of life became worse in short-term during treatment in head and neck cancer patients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) is influenced in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients by a set of factors related to diagnosis, treatment and tumor impacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Quality of Life (QoL) changes in Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients during treatment (radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy).

METHODS

QoL was evaluated prospectively in 63 HNC patients during radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy at three moments: before or at beginning (T0), in the middle (T1 ~ four weeks) and immediately at the end (T2 ~ eight weeks) of treatment. The differences between the scores at different time points was verified using Friedman's non-parametric test. Negative changes between time points were evaluated, with differences (delta) of ±10 points being considered to be clinically significant.

RESULTS

The total mean age was 59.1 ± 9.5y, and 82.5% were male. The oral cavity and larynx were more frequent tumors. The functional score for 'role' was decreased at time points T1 and T2 as compared to T0, while an improvement in scores was observed for cognitive function. Several physical symptoms also worsened over time, such as: fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dry mouth and sticky saliva, swallowing and skin symptoms, senses and teeth problems. A high frequency of altered and clinically meaningful values were observed for most of domains, ranging from 6 to 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

The QoL became worse at approximately one month after treatment beginning in HNC patients, and this remained until the end of therapy. Protocols directing to early nutritional counseling and management of symptoms of nutritional impact are important to improve clinical outcomes. This is part of preventive actions aiming to make the exhausting treatment process less traumatic and easier to complete.

Preradiation tooth extraction and jaw osteoradionecrosis: Nationwide population-based retrospective study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) within 7 days of tooth extraction is contraindicated because it may increase the risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ). However, delayed RT could compromise survival in patients with HNC. By using a national healthcare database, we reviewed the contraindications and analysed other risk factors for ORNJ.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

By using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 5,062 HNC patients with at least one tooth extraction 1-21 days before the first RT day (index day) and without any extractions during or after RT from 2000 to 2013 were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time of tooth extraction before the index day: 1-7 days and 8-21 days.

PARTICIPANTS

Taiwanese patients with head and neck cancer.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors of ORNJ.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ORNJ in the included patients was 1.03% (mean follow-up duration, 4.07 ± 3.01 years; range, 1.00-13.99 years). Tooth extraction within 7 days before RT was not associated with increased ORNJ risk (hazard ratio [HR] =0.734; P = .312). Significant risk factors for ORNJ included oral cancer (adjusted HR = 3.961), tumour excision surgery within 3 months before RT (adjusted HR = 3.488) and mandibulectomy within 3 months before RT (adjusted HR = 5.985; all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In a mean follow-up of 4 years, tooth extraction within 7 days before RT for HNC treatment did not increase the ORNJ risk compared with tooth extraction 7-21 days before RT.

Denture use and dental risk factors associated developing osteoradionecrosis after head and neck radiotherapy: A retrospective analysis of hospital records

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the association between denture use and occurrence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 439 HNC patients treated with radiotherapy at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK) (2014-2019) who had missing teeth at the time of discharge were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the participant characteristics and outcome measures. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with occurrence of ORN.

RESULTS

Patients had an average of 14 missing teeth and 39 % wore dentures. Twenty-two (5 %) developed ORN. Out of 22 who developed ORN, 11 (50 %) wore dentures. Of these, 5 patients developed ORN in areas contacted by dentures. Denture use was not significantly associated with the occurrence of ORN (OR = 1.94; 95%CI = 0.79-4.81; p-value = 0.150). Longer duration of radiotherapy (OR =1.03; 95%CI = 1.00-1.06; p-value= 0.048) and more missing teeth in the lower anterior area (OR = 1.11; 95%CI = 1.01-1.22; p-value = 0.024) were significantly associated with the development of ORN.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this single-centre study in which few patients developed ORN, denture use may not be a risk factor for ORN following radiotherapy for HNC. This is likely to be the case if dentures are well-fitting and not causing sores or irritation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Replacement of the missing teeth with dentures in HNC patients post-radiotherapy may be a suitable choice for many HNC survivors. However, a powered study in a large cohort that includes clinical evaluation of dentures and the quality of fit alongside denture wearing experience would be useful to further assess the impact of denture use on the development of ORN.

Swallowing functional outcomes and nutritional status in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: longitudinal study

Objective

To explore the relationships between swallowing functional outcomes and nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

This longitudinal study included 122 patients. Data were collected at three time points: baseline (T1), the third week of RT (T2) and the completion of RT (T3). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was used to assess the symptom of dysphagia and other toxicities; the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was used to assess the patient-perceived swallowing functional outcomes; the nutritional status was evaluated by the weight ratio and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). The generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to measure the correlation of MDADI with the weight ratio or PG-SGA and also to analyse the influential factors of swallowing functional outcomes.

Results

The participants’ acute dysphagia rates were 5.7% at T1, 69.7% at T2 and 77.9% at T3. The swallowing functional outcomes worsen over RT (p<0.001) and were associated with weight ratio (β=0.032, p=0.008) and PG-SGA (β=−0.115, p<0.001). GEE models showed that patients with cancer of the pharynx region, advanced stage, chemoradiotherapy and high RT dose perceived worse swallowing functional outcomes. Oral mucositis, pharynx mucositis and salivary gland inflammation were positively correlated with swallowing functional outcomes, and the pharynx mucositis presented the highest absolute value of β.

Conclusion

The swallowing functional outcomes were negatively correlated with nutritional status. Healthcare professionals should identify early on the population at higher risk and focus on multiple toxicities, especially the management of pharynx mucositis, to improve nutritional status.

Provision of continuous dental care for oral oncology patients during & after COVID-19 pandemic

•

Role of Dental team in assessing the risk prior to oncotherapy.

•

Dentist’s role involving prevention and alleviation of pain in the oral cavity.

•

Disruption of dental care to all patients, including those receiving oncotherapy.

•

Dentists to operate tele-triage and plan video consultations.

•

Counseling and support via tele-dentistry to improve quality of life.

Radiotherapy-induced oral morbidities in head and neck cancer patients

The cumulative effect of radiation and the extent of related morbidities on oral tissues are enormous and increase over time. The numerous radiation-related side effects have a strong, negative influence on the oral functions and are responsible for a drastic reduction in the oral-health-related quality of life of the cancer survivors. In a significant deviation to the earlier approach of advising extraction of all remaining teeth before RT, the concept of preserving a maximum number of teeth in a state of health and for better oral functions postcancer cure has been globally accepted and is adhered to. The effects of radiation and their impact on the general well-being of the patients underscore the relevance of understanding the sequelae of radiation therapy on healthy oral tissues, preexisting oral diseases and their progression, impact on oral treatment needs, limitations in performing the indicated treatment, and shortcoming in treatment outcomes. It is vital for the professionals involved in head and neck cancer care to follow a well-devised referral system for oral care before and after RT and educate patients for a life-long follow-up.

Oral Rehabilitation in Irradiated Patients: Implant- or Tooth-Supported Fixed Prosthesis? A Clinical Report

Cranial radiotherapy has several side effects. One of the most important complications is radiation caries that endangers the treatment prognosis. In the literature, the use of crowns and bridges for irradiated patients has been suggested as a contraindication. In addition, due to the risk of osteoradionecrosis (ORN), there are doubts about tooth extraction and implant placement. Here, we present a treatment sequence and recalls for an irradiated young patient. For irradiated patients, it is recommended to replace teeth with implants when there is no possibility for supragingival prosthetic margin.

Head and Neck Cancer in Belgium: Quality of Diagnostic Management and Variability Across Belgian Hospitals Between 2009 and 2014

Aims: The study assessed the quality of diagnosis and staging offered to patients with a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and the variability across Belgian hospitals. Methods: In total, 9,245 patients diagnosed with HNSCC between 2009 and 2014, were identified in the population-based Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR). The BCR data were coupled with other databases providing information on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures reimbursed by the compulsory health insurance, vital status data, and comorbidities. The use of diagnosis and staging procedures was assessed by four quality indicators (QI) (i.e., use of dedicated head and neck imaging studies, use of PET-CT, TNM reporting and interval between diagnosis and start of treatment), for which a target was defined before the analysis. The association between the binary QIs and observed survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Overall, 82.5% of patients received staging by MRI and/or CT of the head and neck region before the start of treatment. In 47.6% of stage III-IV patients eligible for treatment with curative intent, a whole-body FDG-PET(/CT) was performed. The proportion of patients whose cTNM and pTNM stage was reported to the BCR was 80.5 and 78.4%, respectively. The median interval from diagnosis to first treatment with curative intent was 32 days (IQR: 19-46). For none of these QIs the pre-set targets were reached and a substantial variability between centers was observed for all quality indicators. No binary QI was significantly associated with observed survival. Conclusions: The four quality indicators related to diagnosis and staging in HNSCC all showed substantial room for improvement. For none of them the pre-set targets were met at the national level and the variability between centers was substantial. Each Belgian hospital received an individual feedback report in order to stimulate reflection and quality improvement processes.

Warmer Weather as a Risk Factor for Cellulitis: A Population-based Investigation

Background

The incidence of cellulitis is highly seasonal and this seasonality may be explained by changes in the weather, specifically, temperature.

Methods

Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (years 1998 to 2011), we identified the geographic location for 773719 admissions with the primary diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code) of cellulitis and abscess of finger and toe (681.XX) and other cellulitis and abscess (682.XX). Next, we used data from the National Climatic Data Center to estimate the monthly average temperature for each of these different locations. We modeled the odds of an admission having a primary diagnosis of cellulitis as a function of demographics, payer, location, patient severity, admission month, year, and the average temperature in the month of admission.

Results

We found that the odds of an admission with a primary diagnosis of cellulitis increase with higher temperatures in a dose-response fashion. For example, relative to a cold February with average temperatures under 40° F, an admission in a hot July with an average temperature exceeding 90°F has 66.63% higher odds of being diagnosed with cellulitis (95% confidence interval [CI]: [61.2, 72.3]). After controlling for temperature, the estimated amplitude of seasonality of cellulitis decreased by approximately 71%.

Conclusion

At a population level, admissions to the hospital for cellulitis risk are strongly associated with warmer weather.

Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry

Objective Improvement of dental rehabilitation for patients who have undergone radiation therapy requires knowledge of the dose in the maxillary and mandible bones.

Materials and Methods Forty-three patients with head and neck cancers underwent evaluation for dental rehabilitation before radiation treatment dosimetry. The delivered dose to the maxilla and mandible was determined. From the dose data in the literature, three levels of risk of implant failure were defined. According to the delivered doses, the authors calculated the percentage of patients who could be fully rehabilitated with an implant, as proposed by the dentist before radiation planning.

Results Before dosimetry calculation, all of the completely edentulous arches and 94 partially edentulous (PESs) sextants could be optimally rehabilitated. After dose calculation, among the 14 arches of 7 patients who were completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 11 arches (78.6%) and 7 arches (50%) could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively. For the three patients, who were PESs but with one arch that was completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, one arch for each dose condition could receive an optimal prosthesis. Among the 94 PESs sextants, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 41 (43.6%) and 24 (25.5%) sextants could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively.

Conclusion By determining the sites of implantation before dosimetry, the radiation oncologist could shield specified areas, potentially improving the possibilities for dental rehabilitation. The dialogue between the dentist and the radiation oncologist can improve the possibilities for implants and decrease the risk of unsafe implantation.

Retrospective study of osteoradionecrosis in the jaws of patients with head and neck cancer

Objectives

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe complications resulting from radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). It is characterized by persistent exposed and devitalized bone without proper healing for greater than 6 months after a high dose of radiation in the area. To describe the profile and dental management of ORN in HNC patients undergoing RT in an oncological clinical research center.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was performed to analyze dental records from HNC patients with ORN treated at an oncological clinical research center from 2013 to 2017. A total of 158 dental records for HNC patients were selected from a total of 583 records. Afterwards, this number was distributed to three examiners for manual assessments. Each examiner was responsible for selecting dental records that contained an ORN description, resulting in 20 dental records.

Results

Mean patient age was 60.3 years with males being the most affected sex (80.0%). The most affected area was the posterior region of the mandible (60.0%) followed by the anterior region of the mandible (20.0%) and the posterior region of the maxilla (10.0%). The factors most associated with ORN were dental conditions (70.0%) followed by isolated systemic factors (10.0%) and tumor resection (5.0%). There was total exposed bone closure in 50.0% of cases. The predominant treatment was curettage associated with chlorhexidine 0.12% irrigation (36.0%).

Conclusion

Poor dental conditions were related to ORN occurrence. ORN management through less invasive therapies was effective for the closure of exposed bone areas and avoidance of infection.

Dental management prior to radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients diagnosed with head and neck tumors, are treated by surgery, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or a combination thereof. The goal is to describe the management protocol for patients subjected to radiation therapy (RT) and to study their long-term oral health status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in a sample of 50 patients. We analyzed the oral health status and all the variables included applying the adapted protocol of pre-RT.

RESULTS

Prior to RT, 84% of patients required scaling and 32% conservative treatment. Around 74% of patients required at least one exodontia. The mean of exodontias for patients presenting Grade 3 of oral hygiene was 6.50 per person (p<0.0001). The pre-RT study of possible candida infection showed that 78% of patients were negative for this infection. The mean resting saliva production was 39.10 (SD: 23.30; range: 13-145), with a stimulated value of 64.78 (SD: 33.92; range: 16-200).

CONCLUSIONS

All patients should be protocoled to ensure that they present optimal oral conditions prior to initiating RT treatment.

Dental Care for Geriatric and Special Needs Populations

This article reviews considerations for oral health care associated with the most common causes of mortality and morbidity in older adults. Many of these diseases result in functional or cognitive impairments that must be considered in treatment planning to ensure appropriate, safe, and effective care for patients. Many of these considerations parallel those of adults who have lived with developmental disabilities over a lifetime and similar principles can be applied. Systemic diseases, conditions, and their treatments can pose significant risks to oral health, which requires prevention, treatment, and advocacy for oral health care as integral to chronic disease management.