1
|
Raphael MJ, Ko G, Booth CM, Brogly SB, Li W, Kalyvas M, Hanna TP, Patel SV. Factors Associated With Chemoradiation Therapy Interruption and Noncompletion Among Patients With Squamous Cell Anal Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:881-887. [PMID: 32324199 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer is effective but may be associated with toxic effects, and some patients may not be able to complete the planned treatment. Identifying factors associated with treatment interruption and noncompletion is important to target quality improvement efforts. Objective To identify rates of chemoradiation treatment interruption or noncompletion and factors associated with this among patients with anal cancer treated in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants In this population-based, retrospective cohort study, the Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify all incident cases of squamous cell anal cancer treated with curative-intent radiation from 2007 to 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Final analysis of data was performed on August 9, 2019. Exposures Curative-intent radiation therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Treatment interruption was defined as more than 7 days between fractions of radiation. Radiation completion was defined as receipt of 45 Gy or more and 25 fractions of radiation. Chemoradiation completion was defined as radiation completion and 2 doses of combination chemotherapy. Associations between patient factors and treatment interruption and noncompletion were estimated with log-binomial models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of treatment interruption or noncompletion with all-cause death, cancer-specific death, and the combined outcome of colostomy or death. Results Overall, 1125 patients with stage I-III anal cancer were treated with curative-intent radiation. Treatment interruptions occurred in 262 (23%). Radiation and chemoradiation noncompletion occurred in 199 (18%) and 280 (25%), respectively. No associations were found to correlate with an increased risk of treatment interruption. Patients older than 70 years were less likely to complete chemoradiation (risk ratio [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.70), compared with those younger than 50 years. Patients with a higher number of comorbidities were also less likely to complete chemoradiation (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.95). Patients who did not complete chemoradiation had a higher risk of requiring salvage abdominoperineal resection (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.31), overall death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23-1.92), cancer-specific death (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.14-2.22), and colostomy or death (HR, 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.93). Treatment interruptions longer than 7 days were not associated with death. Conclusions and Relevance Many patients undergoing curative-intent chemoradiation for anal cancer experienced treatment interruption or noncompletion. Quality improvement initiatives to optimize treatment continuity and completion are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Raphael
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Ko
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,International Credential Evaluation Service, Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan B Brogly
- International Credential Evaluation Service, Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wenbin Li
- International Credential Evaluation Service, Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Kalyvas
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,International Credential Evaluation Service, Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunil V Patel
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,International Credential Evaluation Service, Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim KS, Chang AR, Kim K, Koh HK, Jang WI, Park HJ, Chang JH, Kim MS. Post-operative radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma incidentally discovered after local excision: a propensity score matched analysis of retrospective multicenter study. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190667. [PMID: 31825665 PMCID: PMC7055428 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of post-operative radiation therapy (RT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) incidentally detected after excision, and compare these outcomes with those of definitive RT without excision for exploring the possibility of treatment de-intensification. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 25 patients with T1-2N0-1 ASCC who underwent RT following incidental tumor resection were selected from multicenter retrospective database. And, we selected one-to-one matched 25 patients receiving definitive RT from the same database using propensity score matching method, and the outcomes were compared. RESULTS Median age was 60 years (range, 30-76), and 18 patients (72%) were female. 19 patients (76%) had T0/1 tumors and four patients (16%) had regional lymph node metastases. Hemorrhoidectomy was performed in eight patients (32%) and the others underwent local excision. 12 patients (48%) had microscopic or gross residual diseases. Median RT dose to the primary lesion was 50.4 Gy (range, 40-60). Concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 23 patients (92%). Median follow-up period was 71 months (range, 4.5-203.1 months). None of the patients showed recurrence during follow-up. However, one patient died after 6 months due to the chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicity. When compared with those patients receiving definitive RT, clinicopathological variables were well-balanced between the two groups. While matched paired patients treated with definitive RT received a higher median RT dose of 54 Gy (range, 45-61.2) and concurrent chemotherapy was given to 22 patients (88%), overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.262). CONCLUSION Patients treated with RT for early stage ASCC after local excision showed favorable treatment outcomes. Further study is warranted to justify the de-intensification of the treatment for these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Post-operative RT can achieve favorable treatment outcomes in incidental ASCC with residual diseases after local excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dale JE, Sebjørnsen S, Leh S, Rösler C, Aaserud S, Møller B, Fluge Ø, Erichsen C, Nadipour S, Kørner H, Pfeffer F, Dahl O. Multimodal therapy is feasible in elderly anal cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:81-87. [PMID: 27808666 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1244356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients are diagnosed with an anal cancer in high ages. We here present the outcome after oncological therapy for patients above 80 years compared with younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A series of 213 consecutive patients was diagnosed and treated at a single institution from 1984 to 2009. The patients received similar radiation doses but with different techniques, thus progressively sparing more normal tissues. The majority of patients also had simultaneous [5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C] or induction chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5FU). The patients were stratified by age above or below 80 years. Despite that the goal was to offer standard chemoradiation treatment to all, the octo- and nonagenarians could not always be given chemotherapy. RESULTS In our series 35 of 213 anal cancer patients were above 80 years. After initial therapy similar complete response was observed, 80% above and 87% below 80 years. Local recurrence rate was also similar in both groups, 21% versus 26% (p = .187). Cancer-specific survival and relative survival were significantly lower in patients above 80 years, 60% and 50% versus 83% and 80%, (p = .015 and p = .027), respectively. CONCLUSION Patients older than 80 years develop anal cancer, but more often marginal tumors. Even in the oldest age group half of the patients can tolerate standard treatment by a combination of radiation and chemotherapy, and obtain a relative survival of 50% after five years. Fragile patients not considered candidates for chemoradiation may be offered radiation or resection to control local disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Espen Dale
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sigrun Sebjørnsen
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sabine Leh
- Gades Institute, Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Cornelia Rösler
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stein Aaserud
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Møller
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øystein Fluge
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Erichsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Saied Nadipour
- Department of Surgery, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Frank Pfeffer
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Olav Dahl
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glynne-Jones R, Saleem W, Harrison M, Mawdsley S, Hall M. Background and Current Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Oncol Ther 2016; 4:135-172. [PMID: 28261646 PMCID: PMC5315080 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-016-0024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, a summary of our current understanding of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) and the advances in our knowledge of SCCA regarding screening, prevention, the role of the immune system, current treatment and the potential for novel targets are discussed. The present standard of care in terms of treatment is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) concurrently with radiation, which results in a high level of disease control for small early cancers. Preservation of the anal sphincter is achieved in the majority, although anorectal function is often impaired. Although evidence from prospective studies to support a change in the treatment strategy is lacking, patients with HPV-negative SCCA appear to be less responsive to chemoradiation (CRT) and relapse more frequently. In contrast, HPV-positive tumours usually fare better, but oncological outcomes are modified by smoking and immune incompetence. There is current interest in escalating the radiotherapy dose for larger, more advanced tumours, and de-escalating treatment for HPV-positive tumours. The use of novel immunological treatments to target the underlying different molecular pathways of HPV-positive cancers is exciting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Waqar Saleem
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Suzy Mawdsley
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Marcia Hall
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cruz SHA, Nadal SR, Nadal CRM, Calore EE. Evaluation of Langerhans cells counts comparing HIV-positive and negative anal squamous cell-carcinoma patients. Acta Cir Bras 2013; 27:720-6. [PMID: 23033134 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502012001000009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Accepted: 08/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the differences in Langerhans cells (LCs) populations between HIV-positive and negative anal squamous cell carcinomas patients. METHODS Twenty five patients (14 HIV-positive and 11 HIV-negative) were evaluated. Paraffin-block transversal thin sections from biopsies of anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) were stained using the anti-CD1A antibody that identifies activated LCs. LCs counts were performed using histometry at 20 different sites, at baseline in the ASCC cases. These were then compared with LCs counts in anal canal specimens from HIV-negative and positive patients without ASCC (controls groups). RESULTS In patients with ASCC, the LC count was greater among HIV-negative individuals than among HIV-positive individuals (p<0.05). The LC count was greater in the control HIV-negative group than in HIV-positive patients with ASCC (p<0.05). CONCLUSION There was a lower amount of activated LCs in HIV-positive patients with anal squamous cell carcinomas than in HIV-negative patients, thereby suggesting worsening of the immune response.
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:1495-501. [PMID: 18521675 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9361-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2007] [Revised: 02/06/2008] [Accepted: 03/18/2008] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Following initial radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer, patients who present with either persistent or locally recurrent disease are treated by abdominoperineal resection. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the long-term survival and prognostic factors after such surgery in a single institution. METHODS Over a 34-year period (1969-2003), 422 patients with nonmetastatic anal cancer were treated with a curative intent. Of these, 83 (median age 61 years; 74 women) underwent abdominoperineal resection. RESULTS Forty-one patients underwent abdominoperineal resection for persistent disease and 42 for locally recurrent disease. Postoperative mortality was 4.8 percent and morbidity was 35 percent with 18 percent having perineal wound infections. Median follow-up was 104 months (range, 3-299). The 3-year and 5-year actuarial survival was 62.8 and 56.5 percent respectively. Using univariate analysis, patients below 55 years, females, T1-2 tumors, N0-N1 lymphadenopathy and the absence of locally advanced tumor were associated with significantly improved survival. Surgery, whether for persistent or locally recurrent disease, did not affect the 5-year survival rate. CONCLUSIONS Abdominoperineal resection for nonmetastatic anal cancer is associated with a high morbidity rate but may result in long-term survival regardless of the indication.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cho BC, Ahn JB, Seong J, Roh JK, Kim JH, Chung HC, Sohn JH, Kim NK. Chemoradiotherapy with or without consolidation chemotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in anal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results in 31 patients. BMC Cancer 2008; 8:8. [PMID: 18194582 PMCID: PMC2245963 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2007] [Accepted: 01/15/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate long-term results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin and the potential benefit of consolidation chemotherapy in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHODS Between January 1995 and February 2006, 31 patients with ASCC were treated with CRT. Radiotherapy was administered at 45 Gy over 5 weeks, followed by a boost of 9 Gy to complete or partial responders. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil (750 or 1,000 mg/m2) daily on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33; and, cisplatin (75 or 100 mg/m2) on day 2 and day 30. Twelve patients had T3-4 disease, whereas 18 patients presented with lymphadenopathy. Twenty-one (67.7%) received consolidation chemotherapy with the same doses of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, repeated every 4 weeks for maximum 4 cycles. RESULTS Nineteen patients (90.5%) completed all four courses of consolidation chemotherapy. After CRT, 28 patients showed complete responses, while 3 showed partial responses. After a median follow-up period of 72 months, the 5-year overall, disease-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 84.7%, 82.9% and 96.6%, demonstrating that CRT with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin yields a good outcome in terms of survival and sphincter preservation. No differences in 5-year OS and DFS rates between patients treated with CRT alone and CRT with consolidation chemotherapy was observed. CONCLUSION our study shows that CRT with 5-FU and cisplatin, with or without consolidation chemotherapy, was well tolerated and proved highly encouraging in terms of long-term survival and the preservation of anal function in ASCC. Further trials with a larger patient population are warranted in order to evaluate the potential role of consolidation chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoung Chul Cho
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oehler-Jänne C, Seifert B, Lütolf UM, Studer G, Glanzmann C, Ciernik IF. Clinical outcome after treatment with a brachytherapy boost versus external beam boost for anal carcinoma. Brachytherapy 2007; 6:218-26. [PMID: 17681244 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.02.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2006] [Revised: 01/30/2007] [Accepted: 02/16/2007] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcome after definitive whole pelvis external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy (BT) boost after treatment break vs. external beam boost without break in the treatment of anal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-one consecutive patients with invasive anal carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. Patients treated with an interstitial (192)Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) implant boost of 14Gy/7 fractions/3d given 3 weeks after completion of whole pelvis 45Gy EBRT were compared with those treated with external beam boost of 14.4Gy, started immediately after completion of whole pelvis 45Gy EBRT. Concomitant chemotherapy (CT) with mitomycin C was applied during whole pelvis EBRT depending on tumor stage. Pattern of care, local disease control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. RESULTS Radiotherapy with or without concomitant CT achieved clinical complete response in 93.4% of patients. In early stage tumors, (192)Ir-HDR BT boost with CT resulted in a 5-year LC and CSS of 100%. In all patients, BT boost did not result in improved LC, OS, and CSS compared with EBRT boost, despite stage and treatment bias favoring small tumors to be treated with BT. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 66% and 44% (BT boost) and 66% and 52% (EBRT boost), respectively. Subgroup analysis of Stages I and II disease revealed no significant improvement after BT boost compared with EBRT boost. Acute skin toxicity was less common in the BT boost group (whole cohort: p=0.14; Stages I-IIIa: p=0.05), but long-term morbidity and QOL were similar. No local necrosis was seen after BT boost and the 10-year sphincter preservation rate was 87% in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Interstitial (192)Ir-HDR implant boost with break and EBRT boost without break yield similar results. Acute skin toxicity is reduced with BT boost but long-term morbidity and QOL are identical. BT boost is most beneficial in early stage tumors but the advantage of BT seems to be limited due to its invasiveness, doctor dependence, and logistic circumstances.
Collapse
|
10
|
de Parades V, Bauer P, Benbunan JL, Bouillet T, Cottu PH, Cuenod CA, Durdux C, Fléjou JF, Atienza P. Bilan préthérapeutique initial du carcinome épidermoïde invasif de l’anus. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 31:157-65. [PMID: 17347624 DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(07)89348-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Anal epidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor, comprising less than 5% of all carcinomas of the colon, rectum, and anus. The primary therapy now includes radiotherapy, often in combination with chemotherapy. Radical surgery is now rarely indicated. Therapeutic indications are based on locoregional staging, the presence of visceral metastases and an evaluation of the medical history. Anorectal endosonography is helpful in evaluating locoregional extension. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography scanning and inguinal sentinel lymph node procedure should play a role in a more selective approach in patients with anal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent de Parades
- Service de Proctologie Médico-Interventionnelle, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses - Croix Saint-Simon, Paris.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Bree E, van Ruth S, Dewit LGH, Zoetmulder FAN. High risk of colostomy with primary radiotherapy for anal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 14:100-8. [PMID: 17066231 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9118-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2006] [Revised: 06/06/2006] [Accepted: 06/06/2006] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) has become the primary treatment of choice for anal cancer in an effort to avoid colostomy. The current role of surgery appears generally to be underestimated, since diverting colostomy or abdominoperineal resection still often seems to be necessary for complications and local treatment failure after RT. METHODS The data of 83 patients primarily treated by RT with curative intent throughout a 20-year period in our institute were analyzed regarding the need for colostomy. RESULTS Totally, 28 patients (34%) required creation of a colostomy after primary RT for local failure or treatment-related complications during a mean follow-up period of 39 months. The 3-year actuarial colostomy-free rate was 59% (mean 85 +/- 9 months). Early stage disease, low T-score and absence of infiltration in adjacent organs were associated with a reduced need for colostomy in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis only T-score was an independent variable in predicting prolonged colostomy-free interval. In this study, no statistically significant differences were noted for gender, age, nodal status, total radiation dose, radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In approximately one-third of the patients treated by anal sphincter saving management with curative aimed primary RT, the creation of a colostomy appeared to be necessary for RT complications and local treatment failure. Therefore, patients should be well informed regarding the considerable risk of need for colostomy after RT for anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eelco de Bree
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oehler-Jänne C, Seifert B, Lütolf UM, Ciernik IF. Local tumor control and toxicity in HIV-associated anal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Radiat Oncol 2006; 1:29. [PMID: 16916475 PMCID: PMC1570351 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-1-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2006] [Accepted: 08/18/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the outcome of HIV-seropositive patients under highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) with anal cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical outcome of 81 HIV-seronegative patients (1988-2003) and 10 consecutive HIV-seropositive patients under HAART (1997-2003) that were treated with 3-D conformal RT of 59.4 Gy and standard 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C were retrospectively analysed. 10 TNM-stage and age matched HIV-seronegative patients (1992-2003) were compared with the 10 HIV-seropositive patients. Pattern of care, local disease control (LC), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and toxicity were assessed. RESULTS RT with or without CT resulted in complete response in 100% of HIV-seropositive patients. LC was impaired compared to matched HIV-seronegative patients after a median follow-up of 44 months (p = 0.03). OS at 5 years was 70% in HIV-seropositive patients receiving HAART and 69% in the matched controls. Colostomy-free survival was 70% (HIV+) and 100% (matched HIV-) and 78% (all HIV-). No HIV-seropositive patient received an interstitial brachytherapy boost compared to 42% of all HIV-seronegative patients and adherence to chemotherapy seemed to be difficult in HIV-seropositive patients. Acute hematological toxicity reaching 50% was high in HIV-seropositive patients receiving MMC compared with 0% in matched HIV-seronegative patients (p = 0.05) or 12% in all HIV-seronegative patients. The rate of long-term side effects was low in HIV-seropositive patients. CONCLUSION Despite high response rates to organ preserving treatment with RT with or without CT, local tumor failure seems to be high in HIV-positive patients receiving HAART. HIV-seropositive patients are subject to treatment bias, being less likely treated with interstitial brachytherapy boost probably due to HIV-infection, and they are at risk to receive less chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Burkhardt Seifert
- Department for Social- and Preventive Medicine, Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Urs M Lütolf
- Radiation Oncology, Zurich University Hospital, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dallan LAP, Cruz SHA, Rosa DLD, Bin FC, Nadal SR, Capelhuchnik P, Klug WA. Avaliação dos resultados do tratamento de 14 doentes de carcinoma espinocelular anal. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006. [DOI: 10.1590/s0101-98802006000100004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A radioquimioterapia (RT/QT) tornou-se o tratamento de escolha para o carcinoma espinocelular anal (CEC). Na recidiva local ou na persistência da doença, deve-se instituir o tratamento cirúrgico. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo retrospectivo foi analisar os resultados do tratamento de doentes de CEC anal. MÉTODO: Acompanhamos 17 pacientes com diagnóstico anátomo-patológico de carcinoma espinocelular anal. Eram 14 (82,3%) do sexo feminino e três (17,8%) do masculino. A idade variou de 36 a 78 anos, com média de idade de 59,1 anos. Utilizando a classificação TNM, tivemos quatro (23,6%) no estádio I, seis (35,2%) no II, quatro (23,6%) no IIIa e três (17,6%) no IIIb. Todos foram submetidos a tratamento inicial com RT/QT, exceto um submetido a ressecção local. Definimos que a biópsia negativa, realizada entre 12 e 16 semanas após esse tratamento, determinaria o controle local da doença. RESULTADOS: Perdemos seguimento de três doentes (17,6%). Seguimos os 14 restantes (82,3%) entre um e cinco anos. Todos os doentes nos estádios I e II (10) apresentaram regressão total da doença, enquanto que três (75%) nos estádios IIIa e IIIb tiveram remissão completa. Realizamos a amputação abdomino-perineal de resgate em dois doentes e ressecção local em outros dois. A recidiva local ocorreu em dois (20%) nos estádios I e II e em dois (75%) nos estádios mais avançados (IIIa e IIIb). A sobrevivência em 3 anos foi de 100% nos que se encontravam nos estádios I e II, embora o controle da doença fosse atingido em oito (80%). Nos quatro doentes que estavam nos estádios IIIa e IIIb, a sobrevivência em um ano foi de 75% e em três anos foi de 25%. Esse último permanece livre da doença. Complicações do tratamento radioterápico ocorreram em oito doentes (57,1%). Nenhum óbito foi constatado durante o tratamento RT/QT. Os dois doentes, (14,3%) com sorologia positiva para HIV, apresentavam infecção anal pelo Papilomavírus humano (HPV). CONCLUSÃO: A análise dos nossos resultados evidenciou que o esquema de tratamento empregado foi efetivo para o controle local e preservação da função esfincteriana do ânus e que, na falha do tratamento radioquimioterápico, a operação de resgate controlou localmente a doença.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ortholan C, Ramaioli A, Peiffert D, Lusinchi A, Romestaing P, Chauveinc L, Touboul E, Peignaux K, Bruna A, de La Roche G, Lagrange JL, Alzieu C, Gerard JP. Anal canal carcinoma: early-stage tumors < or =10 mm (T1 or Tis): therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62:479-85. [PMID: 15890590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2004] [Revised: 09/23/2004] [Accepted: 09/28/2004] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical history, management, and pattern of recurrence of very early-stage anal canal cancer in a French retrospective survey. METHODS The study group consisted of 69 patients with Stage Tis and T1 anal canal carcinoma < or =1 cm treated between 1990 and 2000 (12 were in situ, 57 invasive, 66 Stage N0, and 3 Stage N1). The median patient age was 67 years (range, 27-83 years). Of the 69 patients, 66 received radiotherapy (RT) and 3 with in situ disease were treated by local excision alone without RT. Twenty-six patients underwent local excision before RT (12 with negative and 14 with positive surgical margins). Of the 66 patients who underwent RT, 8 underwent brachytherapy alone (median dose, 55 Gy), 38 underwent external beam RT (median dose, 45 Gy) plus a brachytherapy boost (median boost dose, 20 Gy), and 20 underwent external beam RT alone (median dose, 55 Gy). RESULTS Of the 69 patients, 68 had initial local control. Of the 66 patients treated by RT, 6 developed local recurrence at a median interval of 50 months (range, 13-78 months). Four patients developed local failure outside the initial tumor bed. Of the 3 patients with Tis treated by excision alone, 1 developed local recurrence. No relation was found among prior excision, dose, and local failure. The 5-year overall survival, colostomy-free survival, and disease-free survival rate was 94%, 85%, and 89%, respectively. The rate of late complications (Grade 1-3) was 28% and was 14% for those who received doses <60 Gy and 37% for those who received doses of > or =60 Gy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Most recurrences occurred after a long disease-free interval after treatment and often outside the initial tumor site. These small anal cancers could be treated by RT using a small volume and moderate dose (40-50 Gy for subclinical lesions and 50-60 Gy for T1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Ortholan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Renehan AG, Saunders MP, Schofield PF, O'Dwyer ST. Patterns of local disease failure and outcome after salvage surgery in patients with anal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92:605-14. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Salvage surgery for anal cancer is usually reserved for local disease failure, but issues relating to the prediction of local failure and surgical outcome are ill defined.
Methods
Between 1988 and 2000, 254 patients with non-metastatic anal epidermoid carcinoma were treated at a regional cancer centre with radiotherapy (n = 127) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 127).
Results
There were 99 local disease failures (39·0 per cent), all but five occurring within 3 years of initial treatment. Increasing age (P < 0·001, Cox model), total radiation dose (P = 0·004) and tumour stage (P = 0·010) were independent predictors of local failure. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates after local disease failure were 46 and 29 per cent; the corresponding rates after salvage surgery (73 patients) were 55 and 40 per cent. A positive resection margin was the strongest negative predictor of survival after salvage surgery (P = 0·008, log rank test). Of 52 patients treated before the routine consideration of primary plastic reconstruction, delayed perineal wound healing occurred in 22 (42 per cent).
Conclusion
In the management of anal cancer, local disease failure is a major clinical problem requiring early detection followed by radical surgery, often accompanied by plastic reconstruction. By implication, these factors favour the centralization of treatment for this uncommon cancer to a multidisciplinary oncology team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Renehan
- Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M P Saunders
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P F Schofield
- Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S T O'Dwyer
- Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|