Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis for Identifying the Optimal Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Regimens for Treating Gastric Cancer

Background: Several taxane-based chemotherapy regimens are effective in the treatment of gastric cancer; nevertheless, their comparative efficacy and safety remain disputed. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of different taxane-based chemotherapy regimens against gastric cancer.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in multiple electronic databases. A Bayesian NMA was performed to combine the direct and indirect evidence and estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of different taxane-based chemotherapy regimens simultaneously by utilizing WinBUGS 1.4.3 and Stata 13.1 software. The efficacy outcomes included overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR), and the safety outcomes were adverse reactions (ADRs), namely, neutropenia, leucopenia, vomiting, and fatigue.

Results: A total of 37 RCTs were identified involving 7,178 patients with gastric cancer, and 10 taxane-based chemotherapy regimens (RT, T, TC, TCF, TF, TO, TOF, mTCF, mTF, and mTOF) were collected in gastric cancer therapy. According to the results of cluster analysis, compared with other taxane-based chemotherapy regimens, the regimens of TOF, mTCF, and TF were associated with the most favorable clinical efficacy in improving OS, PFS, and ORR. On the other hand, the regimens of T and mTF had the potential to be the most tolerable and acceptable therapeutic alternative in terms of ADRs.

Conclusions: The current NMA provides the evidence that the combination of taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and fluorouracil is associated with the most preferable and beneficial option for patients with gastric cancer, although additional results from multicenter trials and high-quality studies will be pivotal for supporting our findings.

Two postoperative chemotherapies for gastric cancer: FOLFOX4 vs. TPF

Clinical effects of FOLFOX4 and TPF chemotherapy regimen on postoperative gastric cancer patients were investigated. A total of 60 patients admitted to the First People's Hospital of Changzhou receiving gastric cancer operation were selected and they were divided into two groups at random. Thirty patients in the FOLFOX4 group were treated with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin, while 30 patients in the TPF group were treated with paclitaxel, fluorouracil and cisplatin. The therapeutic effects, adverse reactions, quality of life and survival time of patients in the two groups were observed. The total effective rate of the FOLFOX4 group was 73.3%, which was significantly higher than that of the TPF group (43.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportions of neurotoxicity and thrombocytopenia in the FOLFOX4 group were 56.7 and 33.3%, while those in the TPF group were 26.7 and 60%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The increasing proportion of postoperative scores of the FOLFOX4 group was 46.7%, which was significantly higher than that of the TPF group (20%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The 2- and 3-year survival rates of the FOLFOX4 group were 63.3 and 50%, which were significantly higher than those of the TPF group (36.7 and 23.3%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Therefore, the effective rate of FOLFOX4 regimen is high in the treatment of gastric cancer with relatively fewer adverse reactions, which has a certain advantage.

Combinatorial Antitumor Activity of Oxaliplatin with Epigenetic Modifying Agents, 5-Aza-CdR and FK228, in Human Gastric Cancer Cells

Epigenetic silencing is considered to be a major mechanism for loss of activity in tumor suppressors. Reversal of epigenetic silencing by using inhibitors of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) or histone deacetylases (HDACs) such as 5-Aza-CdR and FK228 has shown to enhance cytotoxic activities of several anticancer agents. This study aims to assess the combinatorial effects of gene-silencing reversal agents (5-Aza-CdR and FK228) and oxaliplatin in gastric cancer cells, i.e., Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative SNU-638 and EBV-positive SNU-719 cells. The doublet combinatorial treatment of 5-Aza-CdR and FK228 exhibited synergistic effects in both cell lines, and this was further corroborated by Zta expression induction in SNU-719 cells. Three drug combinations as 5-Aza-CdR/FK228 followed by oxaliplatin, however, resulted in antagonistic effects in both cell lines. Simultaneous treatment with FK228 and oxaliplatin induced synergistic and additive effects in SNU-638 and SNU-719 cells, respectively. Three drug combinations as 5-Aza-CdR prior to FK228/oxaliplatin, however, again resulted in antagonistic effects in both cell lines. This work demonstrated that efficacy of doublet synergistic combination using DNMT or HDACs inhibitors can be compromised by adding the third drug in pre- or post-treatment approach in gastric cancer cells. This implies that the development of clinical trial protocols for triplet combinations using gene-silencing reversal agents should be carefully evaluated in light of their potential antagonistic effects.

Knockdown of High Mobility Group-Box 3 (HMGB3) Expression Inhibits Proliferation, Reduces Migration, and Affects Chemosensitivity in Gastric Cancer Cells

Background

High mobility group-box 3 (HMGB3) has been shown to affect tumor initiation and progression. This research aimed to investigate the role of HMGB3 in gastric cancer (GC) cell proliferation, migration, invasion, chemoresistance, and its potential molecular mechanisms.

Material/Methods

GC MGC803 and BGC823 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting the HMGB3 gene. The expressions of HMGB3 protein in MGC803 and BGC823 cells after transfection were detected by Western blot assays. We detected cell proliferation and cell cycle by MTT and flow cytometry assay. Cell migration and invasion were determined by wound scratch and transwell assay. MGC803 and BGC823 cells were treated with various concentrations of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. After 24 hours of drug exposure, we performed MTT assays to investigate chemoresistance in both groups. Western blot assays were used to detect related proteins expression.

Results

Silencing of HMGB3 inhibited cell proliferation and induced G0/G1 phase arrest of GC cells partly via modulating p53 and p21 pathways, and downregulating Bcl-2/Bax ratio. RNA interference of HMGB3 inhibited cell invasion and migration by downregulating MMP2 and MMP9. Silencing of HMGB3 enhanced sensitive to cisplatin and paclitaxel, and reduced sensitive to oxaliplatin.

Conclusions

These findings suggest the importance of HMGB3 in the regulation of growth, migration, and apoptosis of GC, improve our understanding of the mechanisms of GC pathogenesis, and may promote the development of novel targeted therapies.

CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.

A phase II study of a modified FOLFOX6 regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Background:

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

Methods:

Seventy-three patients with T2–T4 or N+ were enroled. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end points were the response rate and the R0 resection rate. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results:

Sixty-seven (91.8%) patients completed 3 cycles, with grade 3–4 toxicity arising in 33.0%. The radiology response rate was 45.8%. Sixty-seven (91.8%) patients receiving radical surgery showed different levels of histological regression of the primary tumour, with a ⩾50% regression rate of 49.2%. ypTNM stage (HR 4.045, 95% CI 1.429–11.446) and tumours of diffuse and mixed type (HR 9.963, 95% CI 1.937–51.235; HR 8.890, 95% CI 1.157–68.323, respectively) were significantly associated with OS. The pathologic regression rate (GHR; ⩾2/3/<2/3, ⩾50%/<50%) was statistically significantly associated with OS according to a univariate analysis.

Conclusions:

Perioperative mFOLFOX6 was a tolerable and effective regimen for gastric cancer. The ypTNM stage was an independent predictor of survival. GHR ⩾50%/<50% could be used as a surrogate marker for selecting a postoperative chemotherapy regimen.

Treatment of advanced oesophagogastric cancer with FOLFOX-4 regimen followed by leucovorin/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU as maintenance chemotherapy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with impaired performance status

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-4 combination chemotherapy, followed by leucovorin (LV)/bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as maintenance chemotherapy in elderly (≥ 75 years) patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer with impaired performance status (PS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a PS score >1 were included in this study. PS evaluations were performed by a geriatrician and two medical oncologists. FOLFOX-4 consisted of oxaliplatin concurrently with LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU every 2 weeks. After a maximum of six FOLFOX-4 cycles, patients with no evidence of disease progression received maintenance treatment with LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 32 (84.2%) patients had a PS score of 2 and six (15.7%) patients had a PS score of 3. After completion of FOLFOX-4, 18 (47.3%) patients achieved a partial response and 14 (36.8%) patients had stable disease. Thirty-two patients (84.2%) received maintenance chemotherapy for a median of eight cycles (range one to 26 cycles). The 6-month disease-control rate was 47.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.9-64.1]. The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI 4.7-6.8) and the median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI 8.1-11.7). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in six patients (15.7%), and Grade 3 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients (5.2%).

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX-4 followed by LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU as maintenance chemotherapy seems to be an active and well-tolerated first-line treatment strategy for elderly patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer and impaired PS.

The anthelmintic drug mebendazole inhibits growth, migration and invasion in gastric cancer cell model

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of MBZ on a human malignant ascites cell line derived from a primary gastric cancer tumor. Our data reveal that MBZ showed high cytotoxicity in vitro, displaying an IC50 of 0.39 μM and 1.25 μM in ACP-02 and ACP-03, respectively. The association between MBZ and 5-FU increased slightly the cytotoxicity when compared to MBZ and 5-FU alone. Furthermore, MBZ disrupted the microtubule structure of AGP-01 cells and inhibited significantly the invasion and migration of these cells. Activity of active MMP-2 significantly decreased at all tested concentration of MBZ compared to negative control. These results support the indication of MBZ in combination with chemotherapeutic agents as a possible adjuvant therapy for the management/treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer since MBZ is a drug of low cost with acceptable safety profile and reduced toxicity to normal cells. However, clinical trials must be performed in o to evaluate its efficacy in gastric cancer patients.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX-6 and DCF regimens as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy and toxicity of the oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + leucovorin (LV) regimen [modified (m)FOLFOX-6] with that of the docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-FU regimen (DCF) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A total of 72 patients received DCF (75 mg/m² docetaxel and 75 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m² 5-FU on days 1-5) every 21 days, whereas 54 patients received mFOLFOX-6 (85 mg/m² oxaliplatin and 400 mg/m² LV as a 2-h infusion, followed by a 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m² and 2,400 mg/m² 5-FU as a 46-h continuous infusion) every 14 days. In the DCF arm, 55 (76.4%) of the patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 48-72 h following completion of chemotherapy. The median follow-up of the study was 12.1 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 37.0% for mFOLFOX-6 and 40.3% for DCF (P=0.72). The median time to progression was 6.5 and 6.2 months in the mFOLFOX-6 and DCF arms, respectively (P=0.70). The median overall survival was 11.4 and 13.5 months in the mFOLFOX-6 and DCF arms, respectively (P=0.72). The rates of hematological toxicity did not differ between the two arms. However, in the subgroup analysis, grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were significantly more common among patients who had not received G-CSF prophylaxis in the DCF arm. The incidence of grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting and diarrhea were significantly higher in the DCF arm. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the efficacy of the mFOLFOX-6 regimen was comparable to that of the DCF regimen in AGC patients. In addition, the benefit of G-CSF prophylaxis in conjunction with the DCF regimen was demonstrated.

Phase I dose-finding study of sorafenib with FOLFOX4 as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and efficacy of sorafenib in combination with FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin/leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, we performed a phase I dose-finding study in nine evaluable patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

According to modified Fibonacci method, the design of this study was to guide elevation of the sorafenib dosage to the next level (from 200 mg twice daily to 400 mg twice daily and then, if tolerated, 600 mg twice daily). If the patient achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) after eight cycles of treatment, combination chemotherapy was scheduled to be discontinued and sorafenib monotherapy continued at the original dose until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

In sorafenib 200 mg twice daily group, DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients, and in 400 mg twice daily group, it was observed in 2 of 3 patients. Seven of 9 (77.8%) evaluable patients achieved PR, with a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.9-14.7] months. Common adverse effects include hand-foot syndrome, leukopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-daily dosing of sorafenib 200 mg in combination with FOLFOX4 was proven effective and safe for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and could be an appropriate dosage for subsequent phase II clinical studies.

Thymidylate synthase genotype-directed chemotherapy for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies indicate associations between TSER (thymidylate synthase enhancer region) genotypes and clinical outcomes in patients receiving 5-FU based chemotherapy, but well-controlled prospective validation has been lacking.

METHODS

In this phase II study (NCT00515216 registered through ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00515216), patients with "good risk" TSER genotypes (at least one TSER*2 allele) were treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy to determine whether prospective patient selection can improve overall response rates (ORR) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, compared with historical outcomes in unselected patients (estimated 43%).

RESULTS

The ORR in genotype-selected patients was 39.1% (9 partial responses out of 23 evaluable patients, 95% CI, 22.2 to 59.2), not achieving the primary objective of improving ORR. An encouraging disease control rate (DCR, consisting of partial responses and stable diseases) of 95.7% was noted and patients with homozygous TSER*2 genotype showed better tumor response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first prospective, multi-institutional study in patients with gastric or GEJ cancers, selecting patients with at least one TSER*2 allele did not improve the ORR but led to an encouraging DCR. Further studies are needed to investigate the utility of selecting patients homozygous for the TSER*2 allele and additional genomic markers in improving clinical outcomes for patients with gastric and GEJ cancers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00515216.

FOLFOX-4 Regimen as First-Line Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Safety Study

Gastric cancer is often diagnosed in advanced stage (AGC) and in elderly patients. Current chemotherapies induce severe toxicity and are difficult to deliver. Some authors have shown the activity and safety of oxaliplatin with various 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) infusions in AGC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of the FOLFOX-4 regimen in elderly patients with AGC. From 6/2003 to 7/2005, 33 patients (median age 74 years, range 66-79 years) were enrolled into the study. 31 patients were assessable for the safety analysis and for response. We recorded complete response in 4 patients (13%), partial response in 6 patients (19%), 9 (29%) stable disease and 12 progressive disease for an overall response rate of 32% (95% CI, 16% to 48%). At median follow-up of 20 months the median time to progression was 6.4 months. The therapy was well tolerated, the main G1/2 toxicities were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Only 2 patients suffered from severe vomiting. Severe hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Anemia G3 was recorded in 3 patients, neutropenia G3 in 6 patients and febrile neutropenia in 1 patient. G1 and G2 neurotoxicity were a common event while G3 sensorial neuropathy was not reported. We conclude that although our patients were elderly and most had a PS 2, the regimen was manageable, easy to deliver, well accepted by the patients and active.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients with associated diseases

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are generally underrepresented in the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFOX regimen in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and presenting associated disease(s).

METHODS

A total of 43 patients aged ≥70 years received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) together with 6S-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks. Assessment of response was performed every four cycles according to RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 74 years (range, 70-83 years). Overall response rate was 34.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.6-49.1, with 3 complete responses and 12 partial responses. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%), fatigue in 3 patients (7.0%), and vomiting in 2 patients (4.6%). Grade 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 5 patients (11.6%) and 1 patient (2.3%), respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.8 and 10.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified FOLFOX regimen is an active and well-tolerated treatment for elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and also represents a good therapeutic option in patients with associated disease(s).

Synergistic antitumor effects of dasatinib and oxaliplatin in gastric cancer cells

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate whether dasatinib, a Src inhibitor, has the synergistic effect with oxaliplatin in treating gastric cancer cells.

METHODS

The baseline levels of total Src and p-Src in 10 human gastric cancer cell lines and gastric mucosa epithelial cell line GES-1 were detected by Western blot (WB). The changes of Src and p-Src expression after oxaliplatin exposure were evaluated by WB. The combination indices and clonogenic assay were used to evaluate the synergistic effects of dasatinib with oxaliplatin on cell growth and proliferation in vitro. Gastric cancer xenografts in nude mice were established and treated by oxaliplatin with or without dasatinib. The tumor growth curves were calculated and the impacts of different treatment on the tumor proliferation and src protein expression in gastric cancer xenografts were determined by immunohistochemistry staining and WB.

RESULTS

The different levels of Src expression in gastric cancer cells were related with their different sensitivity to oxaliplatin. The expression of p-Src, but not total Src, was elevated after oxaliplatin exposure both in vitro and in vivo. Dasatinib could dramatically inhibit p-Src expression, and combination indices demonstrated that dasatinib and oxaliplatin were synergistic in inhibiting gastric cancer cell growth. Dasatinib plus oxaliplatin were more effective in inhibiting clone formation than oxaliplatin or dasatinib monotherapy in clonogenic assay. The tumor volume and tumor weight of xenografts were significantly lower in doublet treatment group than those in single-agent treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dasatinib plays synergistic role with oxaliplatin in inhibiting gastric cancer cell growth both in vitro and in vivo, via inhibiting Src activity stimulated by oxaliplatin.

A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of a first-line treatment with modified FOLFOX-4 in unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients

AIM

Dismal clinical results in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer highlight the need for effective systemic chemotherapy. An increase in adverse events associated with systemic chemotherapy is shown in elderly patients, but it remains controversial whether they should receive the same chemotherapy used for younger patients. We retrospectively studied 73 patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, including 48 nonelderly patients (<65 years old) and 25 elderly patients (≥65 years old) who received a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-4 regimen).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to June 2011, 73 patients with histologically confirmed unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated with an mFOLFOX-4 regimen of 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin and 200 mg/m(2) of leucovorin on the first day, followed by a 24-hour continuous infusion of 1,000 mg/m(2) of 5-fluorouracil in 2 days with a 2-week interval. Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable adverse events occurred.

RESULTS

Overall response rates show clinical efficacy (41.1%, 30/73 patients), stable cancer (26.0%, 19/73 patients) and progressive cancer (32.9%, 24/73 patients). The response rate was 36.0% in the elderly group and 43.8% in the nonelderly group (p = 0.891). In elderly patients, the overall time to progression was 8.1 months and the median overall survival was 11.9 months. On the other hand, in nonelderly patients, the overall time to progression was 7.9 months (p = 0.483) and the median overall survival was 11.2 months (p = 0.953). The results show no statistical differences in efficacy and adverse events between elderly and nonelderly groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mFOLFOX-4 therapy is an effective and safe first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients. Moreover, mFOLFOX-4 was well tolerated and effective in both nonelderly and elderly patients.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin between elderly patients over 65 years and younger patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin is commonly used to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study was designed to compare the efficacy and the safety of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered biweekly (mFOLFOX6) between elderly patients aged over 65 years and younger counterparts with AGC.

METHODS

This analysis included 82 AGC patients (≥65:31, <65:51). Patients with previously untreated chemo-naïve advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,500 mg/m(2), leucovorin 75 mg/m(2) 22 h infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and safety, including response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and grade ≥3 adverse events, between patients aged ≥65 years and patients aged <65 years.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between both groups (≥65: 5.8 months, <65: 5.7 months, respectively, HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.44-1.16, P = 0.18). Median overall survival was not significantly different between both groups (≥65: 10.3 months, <65: 9.5 months HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.50-1.37, P = 0.46). The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia did not differ with age group (≥65: 51.6%, <65: 43.1%); nor did the rates of neutropenic fever (≥65: 16.1%, <65: 5.9%), and infection without neutropenia (≥65: 3.2%, <65: 3.9%). Rates of grade ≥3 toxicities such as thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

mFOLFOX6 maintains its efficacy and safety in elderly patients aged over 65 years in comparison with AGC patients aged <65 years. Its judicious use should be considered regardless of age.

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and folinic Acid combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We retrospectively determined the efficacy and safety of the combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and August 2009, 39 patients with histologically-confirmed, metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer underwent chemotherapy, and the results were retrospectively investigated. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) and FA (200 mg/m(2); 2-hour infusion), then 5-FU (2,400 mg/m(2); 46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients received a total of 210 treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 6 (range, 1 to 16). Of the 32 evaluable patients, zero patients achieved a complete response and 11 patients achieved a partial response (response rate, 28.2%). The median time-to-progression and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 6.5 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 16.0 months), respectively. The main hematologic toxicity was anemia, which was observed in 119 cycles (56.7%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 32 cycles (15.2%). The main non-hematologic toxicity was constipation, which was observed in 91 cycles (46.2%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 71 cycles (33.8%); all cases were grade 1 or 2. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and FA is an active and well-tolerated regimen as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Prospective, randomized trial comparing 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOX4 regimen and LV5Fu2 regimen in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

Eighty patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy were randomized to receive a 2-h infusion of leucovorin (LV; 200mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus (400mg/m(2)/d) and 22-h infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1 (FOLFOX4 regimen or LV5Fu2 regimen). The observation points were recurrence free survival, overall survival and toxicity of the two groups.

RESULTS

All patients had received curative gastrectomy (R0 resection) before received either of the two regimens. The 3-year recurrence free survival rate and the 3-year overall survival rate in FOLFOX4 group were all significantly better than those in the control group (median, 30.0 months vs. 16.0 months, P<0.05; 36.0 months vs. 28.0 months, P<0.05). COX multivariant analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors and oxaliplatin was found to be the independent prognostic factor and could improve the survival rate in FOLFOX4 group. Grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 19% in FOLFOX4 group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, gastrointestinal reaction and so on. Three patients in each group were lost to follow up during treatment.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX4 regimen showed good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy compared with the control group. It may prove to be a suitable alterative regimen in this indication.

Paclitaxel based vs oxaliplatin based regimens for advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PCF), and oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX-4) regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS: Ninety-four patients with AGC were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel (50 mg/m² iv) on days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (20 mg/m² iv) and fluorouracil (750 mg/m² iv) on days 1-5, or oxaliplatin (85 mg/m² iv) and leucovorin (200 mg/m² iv) on day 1, followed by bolus fluorouracil (400 mg/m² iv) and fluorouracil (600 mg/m² iv) on days 1 and 2. The primary end point was the 1-year survival time.

RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of the patients was 48.0% and 45.5% to PCF and FOLFOX-4, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) of PCF and FOLFOX-4 was 82.0% and 81.8%, respectively. The median survival times (MSTs) of the patients were 10.8 and 9.9 mo, respectively, after treatment with PCF and FOLFOX-4. The 1-year survival rate of the patients was 36.0% and 34.1%, respectively, after treatment with PCF and FOLFOX-4. No significant difference was observed in ORR, DCR, MST or 1-year survival rate between the two groups. The most common adverse events were anemia, nausea and vomiting, and grade 3/4 alopecia in PCF treatment group, and anemia, grade 1/2 neurotoxic effect and grade 3/4 neutropenia in FOLFOX-4 treatment group.

CONCLUSION: Patients with AGC have a similar response rate to PCF and FOLFOX-4 regimens with a similar survival rate. The PCF and FOLFOX-4 regimens are efficacious and tolerable as a promising therapy for AGC.

A phase II study of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin plus oral tegafur/uracil and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Background:

Docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil has become a new standard for treating advanced gastric cancer. However, high rates of severe neutropenia limit its application. Modification of the regimen could be the solution to get similar activity but less myelosuppression.

Methods:

Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, or recurrent/metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma without previous chemotherapy were enrolled. This regimen consisted of docetaxel (Tyxan, TTY, Taipei, Taiwan) 30-min infusion at a dose of 36 mg m⁻², followed by cisplatin 30 mg m⁻² infusion over 1 h on days 1 and 8, and oral tegafur/uracil 300 mg m⁻² per day plus leucovorin 90 mg per day on days 1–14, every 3 weeks. Tumour response was evaluated after every 2 cycles of treatment.

Results:

From August 2007 to March 2009, 45 patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years (range: 22–75). Among the 40 patients evaluable for tumour response, one achieved a complete response, 22 had partial responses and 11 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 58% (95% CI: 41–74%) and 53% (95% CI: 38–68%), respectively. The disease control rates in these populations were 85% (95% CI: 70–94%) and 82% (95% CI: 68–92%), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the median time to progression and overall survival were 6.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. Major grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (51%), anaemia (22%), diarrhoea (16%), and infections (20%). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusion:

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and cisplatin plus oral tegafur/uracil and leucovorin are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Safety and efficacy of weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/oxaliplatin/irinotecan in the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer (GC) consists of two-drug, usually fluoropyrimidine-based, combinations, with or without the addition of biological agents. Studies of triple-drug regimens combining 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) with both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have shown promising efficacy in studies of patients with mCRC or GC. However, improved efficacy has often been achieved at the expense of high rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities such as neutropenia and diarrhoea, occasionally even resulting in toxic deaths.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

We performed a phase II study of previously untreated patients with mCRC or GC to assess the safety and efficacy of our 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FUFOXIRI) regimen with weekly administration of irinotecan 70 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2), FA 500 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, repeated from day 36.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were enrolled, 11 each with mCRC and GC receiving a median of four cycles per patient. The FUFOXIRI regimen was generally well tolerated with no toxic deaths, neutropenic fever or grade 4 toxicities. Most common grade 3 side effects were diarrhoea and neutropenia each affecting 24% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity were performed in 48% of all and 60% of patients having received at least two cycles of FUFOXIRI. The overall response rate was 46% (all partial responses), 55% and 36% for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively. Median progression-free survival for all patients, mCRC and GC patients was 9.5, 10.0 and 8.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival for all patients was 16.5, 18.0 and 15.0 months for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data show excellent tolerance and efficacy of the FUFOXIRI regimen in both mCRC and GC. Therefore, FUFOXIRI is a promising backbone for future studies incorporating biologic 'targeted' agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX regimen) in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Forty-six eligible patients older than 65 years with previously untreated AGC received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, together with leucovorin 400 mg/m over 2 h, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2600 mg/m every 2 weeks. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. A median of seven cycles (range 1-12) was administered. The overall response rate was 45.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 31-61%] with two complete responses, 19 partial responses, 15 stable diseases, and 10 progressions. Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-7.8) and median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.2-11.4). Toxicity was fairly mild. Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (8.7%), nausea (4.3%), vomiting (4.3%), diarrhea (2.2%); and grade 4 toxicities occurred in none of the patients. Grades 1-2 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 43.5% of patients. The modified FOLFOX regimen is active, well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients aged above 65 years with AGC.

Pharmacogenetic analyses of a phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil and leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the arbeitsgemeinschaft internistische onkologie

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of germ-line polymorphisms of genes that may impact treatment outcome of platinum and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Blood samples of 156 patients enrolled onto a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin were collected. Polymorphisms within genes of TS, MTHFR, MTR, OPRT, XPD, ERCC1, XRCC1, XPA, GSTP1, GSTT1, and GSTM1 were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-based techniques.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.75 to 13.79 months) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.99 to 6.61 months). The TS-3R/+6 haplotype (P = .004), the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism (P = .015), and genotypes of OPRT-Gly213Ala (P = .003) and XRCC1-Arg399Gln (P = .023) could be identified as independent predictors of OS. For PFS analyses, the TS-3R/+6 haplotye (P = .003) and MTR-A2756G (P = .01) were identified as independent positive predictors. The association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and PFS showed only borderline significance (P = .053). Treatment related hematotoxicity in terms of grade 3/4 leukopenia was lowest among TS-3R/+6 haplotype carriers (P = .037). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was directly associated with the MTR-2756G/G genotype (P = .011), GSTP1-105Ile/Ile genotype (P = .02), and with the ERCC1-118T/8092C-haplotype (P = .042). In addition, significant associations between GSTP1-105Ile/Ile genotype and neurotoxicity and between the XPD-Asn312/751Gln haplotype and nephrotoxicity could be identified (P = .028 and P = .005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings underline the hypothesis that germ-line polymorphisms may play an important role in individualizing chemotherapy in AGC and deserve further prospective evaluation in AGC patients.

Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study

BACKGROUND

This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Median age was 62 years (range 26-76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3-7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.

Phase II trial of biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer were enrolled in the present study. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (40 mg/m(2)) as a 2-h intravenous infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil (2,400 mg/m(2)) as a 46-h continuous infusion. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. There were 12 partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 40.0%. At a median follow-up of 10.6 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival were 3.9 and 8.8 months, respectively. The most common hematological toxicity was grade 1-2 anemia, which was seen in 83.3% of patients. No grade 4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia was noted. The most common non-hematological toxicity was anorexia, which was seen in 70% of patients, although grade 3 anorexia was noted in only 10% of cases. There was no severe treatment-related morbidity or death.

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy consisting of biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancers.

Pharmacogenetic analyses of hematotoxicity in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving biweekly fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT): a translational study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated activity in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, a high rate of grade 3/4 hematotoxicity was reported with these regimens. Our purpose was to identify pharmacogenetic markers with potential to detect patients with increased risk to encounter severe hematotoxicity following treatment with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Polymorphisms of genes involved in DNA repair, drug transport and metabolism were determined in 50 AGC patients receiving FLOT within a phase II trial. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. Genotyping was carried out using PCR-based techniques.

RESULTS

Patients possessing TS-group A genotypes (2R/2R, 2R/3RC, 3RC/3RC) were at increased risk for grade 3/4 hematotoxicity compared with patients harboring a TS-group B genotype (2R/3RG, 3RC/3RG, 3RG/3RG). In all, 59% (20 of 34) of patients with TS-group A genotypes developed grade 3/4 hematotoxicity compared with 25% (4 of 16) of those having TS-group B genotypes (P=0.035). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 53% (18 of 34) of TS-group A patients compared with 19% (3 of 16) in TS-group B patients (P=0.032). Multivariate analyses identified TS-group A genotypes as significant predictors of grade 3/4 overall hematotoxicity {odds ratio (OR) 4.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22; 17.44], P=0.024} and neutropenia [OR 5.74 (95% CI 1.03; 32.08), P=0.047].

CONCLUSION

TS-promoter polymorphisms may be associated with hematotoxicity in AGC patients receiving FLOT.

A study of weekly paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for patients with advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for patients with advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer. Patients were treated with weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) on the 1st, 8th and 15th days combined with 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) by a continuous intravenous infusion from the 1st to the 5th day, and a cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion for 3 days. The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were assessed for response and toxicity. Three patients achieved complete responses, and 20 patients achieved partial responses; the overall response rate was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.9-65.1%). With a median follow-up of 20 months, the median progression-free and overall survivals were 24 and 46 weeks, respectively, with a 1-year survival rate of 41.3% (95% CI, 27.0-56.8%). The most common hematological toxicity was myelosuppression, which included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia; the grade 3 toxicity rate was 26.1% (12/46), and only 1 patient was observed with a grade 4 neutropenia. The nonhematological toxicities included anorexia, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, stomatitis/mucositis, alopecia, dizziness, skin rash, neurotoxicity, and infection; the grade 3 toxicity rate was 34.8% (16/46), but no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination chemotherapy consisting of weekly paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced and recurrent inoperable gastric cancers.

A multiple-center phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin and tegafur-uracil/leucovorin for chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The current study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients were 18-75 years old, had stage IV disease or post-surgery recurrence, no prior palliative chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients in the current study received 2-h i.v. infusion of oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) after diluting in 500 mL 5% dextrose/water (dexan premedication), and 5-HT3 antagonist biweekly. Oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin was given at a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day and 60 mg/day three times daily from day 1 to 21, respectively, followed by a 1-week rest. Response assessment was based on the RECIST criteria and was performed every two courses. Toxicity was assessed according to NCI common toxicity criteria version 2.

RESULTS

From October 2003 to April 2006, 57 patients were evaluated (55 eligible) with a median age of 61 years (range 31-75). According to the assessment of response in 48 evaluable patients, partial response rate was 24/48 (50.0%) (95% CI: 35.23-64.73%) and stable disease was observed in 11 patients (22.92%), and diseased progressed in 13 patients (27.08%). Mean number of oxaliplatin cycles was 3 (0.5-6.5). Median time to progression was 177 days. Median overall survival was 318 days. Major-grade (III/IV) toxicities were diarrhea 25.5%, vomiting 16.5%, anemia 10.9%, numbness 12.7%, thrombocytopenia 7.3%, neutropenia 3.6% and leucopenia 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly, oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer showed acceptable activity and manageable toxicity.

Locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer: current management and new treatment developments

The management of gastric cancer remains a challenge. In recent years, the most important advances have been achieved in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced disease, where significant survival benefits have been demonstrated for both perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. These findings have changed the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. In the setting of metastatic gastric cancer, the development of new cytotoxic regimens must consider the balance between efficacy and toxicity in patients whose overall prognosis is poor. Major advances in recent years include the development of orally administered fluoropyrimidine analogues, which can be used in place of intravenous fluorouracil, and the addition of newer agents such as oxaliplatin and docetaxel, which have demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced disease. Targeted therapies have had a major impact on the management of certain malignancies, and while their evaluation in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains early, it is likely that these agents will continue to be developed and studied in combination with chemotherapy. This article reviews recent advances in the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Targeted therapies, their mechanisms of action and emerging data supporting their use in gastric cancer are also discussed. The two randomized phase III trials supporting adjuvant therapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer are discussed in detail, together with strategies for future trials in this area. Overall, there remains optimism that further incremental gains will be achieved with future studies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapies, both in the adjuvant and metastatic disease settings.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Fifty-five eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC (median age 62 and 90% of patients presented with metastasis) received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) intravenous infusion for 2 h, followed by intravenous infusion of 5-FU (3000 mg/m2) and leucovorin (100 mg/m2) for 46 h every 14 days until the patient's disease was either in progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient's withdrawal or the investigators' decision to discontinue treatment. Of the 55 enrolled patients, 48 were evaluable for response. Three patients (5.4%) showed complete remission and 20 patients (36.4%) achieved partial response. The overall response rate was 47.9%. Nineteen patients (34.5%) had stable disease and six patients (10.9%) showed progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.6 months and the median overall survival was 10.8 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (12.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.4%), diarrhoea (3.6%) and vomiting (9.1%). Peripheral neuropathy was noted in 61.8% of the patients (grade 1/2: 54.5%; grade 3: 7.3%). Our study confirmed that the combination of oxaliplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU/leucoverin without bolus 5-FU as first-line chemotherapy is active for patients with AGC and relatively safe with lower haematological toxicity.

Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: Results of phase II study and comprehensive analysis of polymorphisms as a predictive and prognostic marker

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX-6) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), as first-line palliative combination chemotherapy. We also analyzed the predictive or prognostic value of germline polymorphisms of candidate genes associated with 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients were administered a 2 hour infusion of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and folinic acid (100 mg/m2) followed by a 46 hour continuous infusion of 5-FU (2,400 mg/m2). Genomic DNA from the patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells was extracted. Ten polymorphisms within five genes were investigated including TS, GSTP, ERCC, XPD and XRCC.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (RR) was 43.8%. Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 months and 12.6 months, respectively. Toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable. The RR was significantly higher in patients with a 6-bp deletion homozygote (-6 bp/-6 bp) in TS-3'UTR (55.0% vs. 30.3% in +6 bp/+6 bp or +6 bp/-6 bp, p = 0.034), and C/A or A/A in XPD156 (52.0% vs. 26.1% in C/C, p = 0.038). The -6 bp/-6 bp in TS-3'UTR was significantly associated with a prolonged TTP and OS. In a multivariate analysis, the 6-bp deletion in TS-3'UTR was identified as an independent prognostic marker of TTP (hazard ratio = 0.561, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy appears to be active and well tolerated as first line chemotherapy in AGC patients. The 6-bp deletion in TS-3'UTR might be a candidate to select patients who are likely to benefit from 5-FU based modified FOLFOX-6 in future large scale trial.

Treatment outcomes of oxaliplatin, 5-FU, and leucovorin as salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

We performed a single-institution retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated were eligible for the study. Patients received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and LV 100 mg/m(2) (2-h intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU 2,400 mg/m(2) (46-h continuous infusion) every 2 weeks, and responses were assessed after every three cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine out of 62 patients were assessable for response. Among them, 46 patients had previously been treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. Patients had a median age of 57 years (range 32-76 years), 72.6% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Total 296 courses of chemotherapy were administered as second-line (67.7%) or third-line (27.4%), and the median courses per patient was three cycles. Out of 59 evaluable patients, 14 partial responses were observed (overall response rate, 22.6%). Stable disease was observed in 22 patients (35.5%), and progressive disease in 23 patients (37.1%). The median response duration, time to progression, and overall survival were 2.3, 3.0, and 8.0 months, respectively. The major toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis, and peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in nine patients (14.5%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (1.6%). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included mucositis in one patient (1.6%) and vomiting in two patients (3.2%). Grade 1 or 2 peripheral neuropathy were observed in 18 patients (29.0%), however there were no cases of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin, 5-FU and LV was effective and safe salvage chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.

ERCC1 mRNA levels and survival of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with a modified FOLFOX regimen

Molecular markers involved in DNA repair can help to predict survival in gastric cancer patients treated with 5-FU plus platinum chemotherapy. Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA expression levels were assessed in advanced gastric cancer tumour samples using real-time quantitative PCR in 76 patients treated with a modified FOLFOX (biweekly oxaliplatin plus 5-FU and folinic acid) regimen. Median survival time in patients with low ERCC1 levels was significantly longer than in those with high levels (15.8 vs 6.2 months; P<0.0001). Patients with high TS levels had longer survival than those with low levels (12.2 vs 10.1 months; P=0.01). Forty-eight patients with low ERCC1 and high TS levels had a median survival of 16.1 months (P<0.0001). The hazard ratio for patients with high ERCC1 expression was 9.4 (P<0.0001). In patients with high mRNA levels of ERCC1, alternative chemotherapy regimens should be considered.

Pharmacogenetics and stomach cancer: an update

Although new drugs and association regimens have been used in recent years, the chemotherapeutic outcome for gastric cancer is still poor and improvement in patient survival is not satisfactory. Pharmacogenetics could represent a useful approach to optimize chemotherapeutic treatments in order to identify individuals that are true candidates for clinical benefits from therapy, avoiding the development of severe side effects. The most recent update regarding gastric cancer pharmacogenetics highlights a prominent role of genetic polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase and glutathione S-transferase in the pharmacological treatment with commonly used drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil and platinum derivatives. In order to validate the genetic markers, further larger scale and controlled studies are required. A future challenge is represented by the introduction of targeted therapy in gastric cancer treatment, with the potential emerging tool of pharmacogenetic impact on this field.

Phase II study of docetaxel and S-1 combination therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in combination with a novel oral 5-fluorouracil analogue S-1 for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the stomach and up to one previous chemotherapy regimen were treated with i.v. docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral S-1 80 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (median age, 65 years; range, 25-75 years) received a total of 272 treatment cycles (median, 4; range, 1-17). No complete responses and 27 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 56.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 38-66%]. Eighteen patients (37.5%) had stable disease and three patients (6.3%) had progressive disease as best response. The tumor control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 93.8% (95% CI, 83-98%). Median overall survival was 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.7-20.3 months) and median time to tumor progression was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.0 months). The most common grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (58.3%), leukopenia (41.7%), febrile neutropenia (8.3%), and anemia (8.3%). The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included anorexia (14.6%), stomatitis (8.3%), and nausea (6.3%). No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities were reported and all treatment-related toxicities were resolved.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel/S-1 combination is highly active and well tolerated in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Further investigation in randomized studies is warranted.

Phase I study of short-time oxaliplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (EXE) as first line therapy in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

A phase I trial of short-time oxaliplatin (E), capecitabine (X) and epirubicin (E) for patients with metastatic gastric cancer was initiated to establish the recommended dose for further therapy with short-time EXE. Patients received out-patient therapy with a fixed dose of epirubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1; escalating doses of capecitabine (1,000 to 1,250 mg/m2/day continuously) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin (85 to 130 mg/m2 day 1 as a 30 minutes infusion). Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. From June 2003 to June 2004, 31 patients were treated. Median age was 61 years (39-75 years), and median performance status was 0 (0-2). At level 3, one of six patients developed DLT and at dose level 4, two of six patients developed DLT (both patients had grade 4 hematological toxicities) and thus further dose escalation was not attempted. Median number of cycles was 6 (1-8), median survival was 9.2 months and median TTP was 7.5 months. A combination of epirubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 continuously and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 each 3 weeks is an easily administered and well tolerated out-patient regimen for patients with non-resectable gastric cancer.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin with low dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX-4) as first line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

To determine the activity and toxicities of a low dose leucovorin (ldLV) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen, combined with oxaliplatin administered fortnightly (modified FOLFOX-4), as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients were treated with cycles of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 plus LV 20 mg/m2, followed by 5-FU a 400 mg/m2 bolus and a 22 hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 5-FU on days 1 - 2 every two week intervals. Forty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. One of the 42 patients demonstrated complete response, and 20 partial responses, and overall response rate of 50%. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 7.7 months (95% CI: 3.6 - 11.9 months) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 9.1 - 13.3 months), respectively. Major hematologic toxicities included grade 1 - 2 anemia (39.7%), neutropenia (30.4%) and grade 3 - 4 neutropenia (10.9%). Twelve cycles were associated with neutropenic fever. The most common non-hematological toxicities were grade 2 nausea/vomiting (20%). There was no treatment related death. The modified FOLFOX-4 regimen was found to be a safe and effective first line therapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, folinic acid as first-line palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line palliative chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study patients were chemotherapy-naïve patients (> 65 years old) with histologically confirmed, metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 100 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion), and then 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were studied between April 2004 and October 2006. Of the 34 evaluable patients, none achieved a complete response (CR) and 14 achieved a partial response (PR), resulting in an overall response rate of 41.2%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.2~6.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI: 4.4~12.0 months). The main hematologic toxicities were anemia and neutropenia, which were observed in 56.7% and 32.4% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 8.1% of the patients. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 35.1% of the patients and all were grade 1/2.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen showed good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Combined modalities of resistance in an oxaliplatin-resistant human gastric cancer cell line with enhanced sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil

To identify mechanisms underlying oxaliplatin resistance, a subline of the human gastric adenocarcinoma TSGH cell line, S3, was made resistant to oxaliplatin by continuous selection against increasing drug concentrations. Compared with the parental TSGH cells, the S3 subline showed 58-fold resistance to oxaliplatin; it also displayed 11-, 2-, and 4.7-fold resistance to cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP), copper sulphate, and arsenic trioxide, respectively. Interestingly, S3 cells were fourfold more susceptible to 5-fluorouracil-induced cytotoxicity due to downregulation of thymidylate synthase. Despite elevated glutathione levels in S3 cells, there was no alteration of resistant phenotype to oxaliplatin or CDDP when cells were co-treated with glutathione-depleting agent, l-buthionine-(S,R)-sulphoximine. Cellular CDDP and oxaliplatin accumulation was decreased in S3 cells. In addition, amounts of oxaliplatin- and CDDP–DNA adducts in S3 cells were about 15 and 40% of those seen with TSGH cells, respectively. Western blot analysis showed increased the expression level of copper transporter ATP7A in S3 cells compared with TSGH cells. Partial reversal of the resistance of S3 cells to oxaliplatin and CDDP was observed by treating cell with ATP7A-targeted siRNA oligonucleotides or P-type ATPase-inhibitor sodium orthovanadate. Besides, host reactivation assay revealed enhanced repair of oxaliplatin- or CDDP-damaged DNA in S3 cells compared with TSGH cells. Together, our results show that the mechanism responsible for oxaliplatin and CDDP resistance in S3 cells is the combination of increased DNA repair and overexpression of ATP7A. Downregulation of thymidylate synthase in S3 cells renders them more susceptible to 5-fluorouracil-induced cytotoxicity. These findings could pave ways for future efforts to overcome oxaliplatin resistance.

An open, multi-centre, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, UFT, and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate the response rate and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol((R))) combination chemotherapy with UFT (tegafur, an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, and uracil at a 1 : 4 molar ratio) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Paclitaxel 1-h infusion at a dose of 100 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and oral UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) plus LV 90 mg day(-1) were given starting from day 1 for 14 days, followed by a 7-day period without treatment. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. From February 2003 to October 2004, 55 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range: 32-82). Among the 48 patients evaluated for tumour response, two achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, with an overall response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval: 35-65%). All 55 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.4 and 9.8 months, respectively. Major grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 25 patients (45%) and diarrhoea in eight patients (15%). Although treatment was discontinued owing to treatment-related toxicities in nine patients (16%), there was no treatment-related mortality. Weekly paclitaxel plus oral UFT/LV is effective, convenient, and well tolerated in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (OXALF) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients have been often excluded from or underrepresented in the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials. The primary end point of this study was to determine the response rate and the toxicity of the weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (OXALF) regimen in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. The secondary objective was to measure the time to disease progression and the survival time.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer aged 70 or older were considered eligible for study entry. Patients received weekly oxaliplatin 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 and folinic acid 250 mg/m2. All drugs were given intravenously on a day-1 schedule.

RESULTS

A total of 42 elderly patients were enrolled. Median age was 73 years and all patients had metastatic disease. The response rate according to RECIST criteria was 45.2% (95% CIs: 30%-56%) with two complete responses, 17 partial responses, 13 stable diseases and 10 progressions, for an overall tumor rate control of 76.2% (32 patients). Toxicity was generally mild and only three patients discontinued treatment because of treatment related adverse events. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue (7.1%), diarrhoea (4.8%), mucositis (2.4%), neurotoxicity (2.4%) and neutropenia (4.8%). The median response duration was 5.3 months (95% CIs: 2.13 - 7.34), the median time to disease progression was 5.0 months (95% CIs: 3.75 - 6.25) and the median survival time was 9.0 months (95% CIs: 6.18 - 11.82).

CONCLUSION

OXALF represents an active and well-tolerated treatment modality for elderly patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer.

A phase II study of capecitabine plus 3-weekly oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin every 3 weeks (XELOX regimen) has proven efficacy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. We investigated this combination in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric carcinoma. The study population comprised patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) over 2 h on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks. Patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty evaluable patients (17 men, 3 women) with a median age of 64 years (range 38-75) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI), 44-86%), with complete responses in two patients and partial responses in 11 patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.2-11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached during the study period. There was no grade 4 and little grade 3 toxicity. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (65% of patients) and the most common nonhaematological toxicities were vomiting (65%), neuropathy (60%), diarrhoea (30%), and hand-foot syndrome (20%). In conclusion, XELOX is apparently as effective as triplet combinations and is well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. We are starting a large multi-institutional phase II study of XELOX in this setting.

In-vitro schedule-dependent interaction between oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in human gastric cancer cell lines

In order to define the most effective combination schedule of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), we investigated the in vitro interaction between these drugs in a panel of four human gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines (MKN-1, NUGC-3, NUGC-5 and AZ-521). Cytotoxic activity was determined by the WST-1 assay. Different schedules of the two drugs were compared and evaluated for synergism, additivity or antagonism with a quantitative method based on the median-effect principle of Chou and Talalay. Cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry. Simultaneous and sequential treatments of L-OHP followed by 5-FU exhibited synergistic effects in all four cell lines, whereas the reverse sequence yielded a clear antagonism. 5-FU exclusively arrested cells at the G0/G1 phase, and L-OHP at the G0/G1 and G2/M phases. Apoptosis was most prominent when cells were treated simultaneously or in a sequence of L-OHP followed by 5-FU, producing apoptosis in the majority of treated cells (55.5-61.5%). In contrast, the reverse sequence yielded only 20% induction of apoptosis, the rate being not significantly different from those induced by each drug singly. Moreover, this sequence dependence was further confirmed by the experiment which compared the total number of NUGC-3 cells 7 days after these combination schedules. These findings suggest that the interaction of 5-FU and L-OHP could be highly schedule dependent, with the most efficacious interaction observed in simultaneous combination and that 5-FU followed by L-OHP would not be recommended in clinical trials for patients with advanced gastric cancer.