Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer

A Phase I Study of Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel/S-1 Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). More effective treatment options are highly awaited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and feasibility of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC, determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 in this regimen, and explore preliminary efficacy.

METHODS

Eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC received GAS chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle. Fixed-dose nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) were given intravenously on days 1 and 8. Different doses of S-1 were given orally twice daily from day 1 to day 14 in a 3+3 dose escalation design. According to patients` body surface area, the dose-escalation design was as follows: patients with a body surface area of 1.25-1.5 m2 received S-1 40 mg/day initially and the dose was increased to 60 mg or 80 mg. Patients with a body surface area of more than 1.5 m2 received S-1 60 mg/day initially and the dose was increased to 80 mg or 100 mg. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the toxicity and determine the DLT and MTD of S-1. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate efficacy, including best objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE 5.0. Tumor response was assessed using the RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

A total of 21 eligible patients were included. Due to the infrequence of patients with a body surface area of 1.25-1.5 m2, only 2 patients were included in cohort of S-1 40 mg. The dose-escalation for patients in this group failed to be enrolled completely. For patients with a body surface area of more than 1.5 m2, 3 DLTs in 7 patients were detected at cohort of S-1 100 mg (grade 3 thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage, grade 3 rash, and grade 3 mucositis/stomatitis). S-1 80 mg/day (body surface area: >1.5 m2) was considered to be the MTD in GAS chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle. No grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths were observed. The most commonly occurring hematologic AE of any grade was anemia (38.1%). The most frequent nonhematologic AEs of any grade were peripheral neuropathy (38.1%), dyspepsia (23.8%), constipation (23.8%), and alopecia (23.8%). Response assessment showed that the best ORR was 36.8% (7 of 19 patients) and the DCR was 94.7% (18 of 19 patients). The median PFS was 5.3 (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.0) months and the median OS was 10.3 (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5) months.

CONCLUSION

GAS chemotherapy (21-day cycle) with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/day (body surface area: >1.5 m2) was found to have acceptable toxicity and significant clinical control in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. We conclude that further trials with this combination are warranted. (Trial Identifier: ChiCTR1900027833 [chictr.org]).

Pathologic complete response after gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

We report the case of a 72-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, associated with bulky lymph node metastasis involving the common hepatic artery and moderate amount of ascites around the liver. After 10 cycles of systemic chemotherapy combining gemcitabine and S-1 with well-tolerated toxicities, a CT scan showed a marked shrinkage of the liver mass and lymph nodes (clinical partial response) with disappearance of ascites, which could permit a radical resection of the tumor. He underwent left lobectomy of the liver with lymph node dissection, and histopathological examination revealed pathologic complete response. Seven years after surgery, he is in a good overall condition.

Phase I study assessing the feasibility of the triple combination chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the recommended dose (RD) of a biweekly S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This phase I study used a traditional "3+3" dose-escalation design, with four dose levels. A dose-escalation schedule consisted of two doses of S-1 (60 and 80 mg/m(2) twice daily) for 2 weeks in alternate-day administration, three doses of irinotecan (125, 150, and 180 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and a single dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first four cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose. This clinical study was registered at UMIN000014339.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received this regimen (median, eight cycles; range 4-12). At dose level 3 (S-1, 80 mg/m(2); irinotecan, 150 mg/m(2)), 2/6 patients experienced DLTs of grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. At dose level 4, all three patients experienced DLTs: grade 3 fatigue (n = 1) and grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2). The RD was 80, 85, and 150 mg/m(2) of S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, respectively. We found the following: response rate, 47 %; disease control rate, 80%; median progression-free survival, 6.7 months; overall survival, 13.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOXIRI regimen's RD is 80, 85, and 150 mg/m(2) of S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, respectively.

Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine and S-1 Combination Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Several reports suggest that gemcitabine (GEM) plus S-1 combination (GS) is associated to prolong the survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the safety and efficacy of GS versus GEM.Summary data from randomized trials and retrospective studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses based on the chemotherapy cycles were performed to explore the efficacy and toxicity for therapy. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by removing specific studies to assess the effects of study quality.Between January 2004 and August 2012, 4 RCTs and 2 retrospective studies including a total of 1025 cases were identified. The overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96; P = 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; P < 0.001) for the GS arm were significantly longer than the GEM arm. The differences in objective response rate (ORR) (RR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.33; P < 0.001) and disease control rate (DCR) were also better in the GS arm (RR: 1.37; 95% CI, 1.19-1.59; P < 0.001). Grades 3 to 4 toxicities in both the groups were similar except neutropenia and diarrhea, which were more frequent in the GS arm (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the cycle for chemotherapy every 4 weeks has equivalent efficacy and less toxicity than regimens every 3 weeks in the GS arm.The current meta-analysis suggested that GEM significantly prolonged OS and PFS when added to S-1 combination in patients with unresectable PC. GS therapy also offers better ORR and DCR than GEM monotherapy and no unexpected toxicity was evident.

Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive GS (oral S-1 60 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-15 every 3 weeks and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 15) or gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were randomly assigned. PFS was significantly longer in the GS arm with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95 % CI 0.43-0.98; P = 0.039; median 5.3 vs 3.8 months). Objective response rate (ORR) was also better in the GS arm (21.6 vs 6 %, P = 0.048). Median survival was 8.6 months for GS and 8.6 months for GEM (HR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.61-1.41; P = 0.714). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (44 vs 19.6 %, P = 0.011) and thrombocytopenia (26 vs 8.7 %, P = 0.051) were more frequent in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS therapy improved PFS and ORR with acceptable toxicity profile in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil or oral S-1 improves the prognosis of patients with postoperative liver metastases from pancreatic cancer

Hepatic metastasis is a common cause of treatment failure following resection of pancreatic cancer. In this study, we report our results of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or oral S-1 treatment for postoperative liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. Seven patients with postoperative liver metastases from pancreatic cancer received HAI with GEM plus 5-FU or oral S-1 between October, 2008 and September, 2010 at Kanazawa University Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan). Three out of the 7 cases exhibited a partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and stable disease (SD) was achieved in 3 out of the 7 cases (response rate, 85.7%). A decrease in serum tumor marker CA 19-9 levels was observed after 10 HAI treatment cycles in 5 out of the 7 cases. The median time to treatment failure was 8 months (range, 0–17 months). Adverse events included grade 3 leukocytopenia in 1 case and anemia in all 7 cases, although 5 out of the 7 patients were anemic prior to HAI therapy. Grade 2 thrombocytopenia was also observed in 2 cases. Non-hematological events, such as nausea, diarrhea, liver injury or neuropathy and life-threatening toxicities were not reported; however, 6 patients (85.7%) developed catheter-related complications and the HAI catheter and subcutaneous implantable port system had to be removed. These findings demonstrated that HAI may deliver high doses of chemotherapeutic agents directly into the tumor vessels, producing increased regional levels with greater efficacy and a lower incidence/severity of systemic side effects. In conclusion, HAI chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for liver metastases from pancreatic cancer.

A phase I study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oral S-1 for resectable pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose (RD) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine (GEM) plus oral S-1 in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Thirteen patients with radiologically proven resectable pancreatic cancer were included in this study. S-1 was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, and GEM was administered on days 8 and 15 for two pre-operative cycles. The dose of S-1 in this study was planned with fixed doses of GEM (1,000 mg/m2): 20, 30 and 40 mg/day for levels 0, 1 and 2, respectively. Treatment was initiated at level 1 in 3 patients, while adverse events occurred in 2 patients during the second course, leading to a dose reduction to level 0 for the 8 remaining patients. Two of the 10 patients enrolled at level 0 were excluded. Of the remaining 8 patients, GEM administration was terminated due to DLT on day 15, during the first course in 3 patients, while level 0 dosage reached MTD. Surgery was performed for the remaining 11 patients included in the study. Post-operative complications included pancreatic fistulas in 5 patients and Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in 1 patient. Two of the 11 patients exhibited a partial response and 9 patients stable disease. Eight of the 11 tumor specimens showed histopathological evidence of tumor cell injury. In conclusion, NAC with GEM and S-1 was not well-tolerated in this study. However, pre-operative chemotherapy may be effective against pancreatic cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider NAC regimens for pancreatic cancer.

A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study

Background:

This randomised phase II trial compared gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

Patients were randomly assigned to 4-week treatment with gemcitabine alone (1000, mg m⁻² gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) or gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (1000, mg m⁻² gemcitabine by 30-min infusion on days 1 and 15 and 40 mg m⁻² S-1 orally twice daily on days 1–15). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results:

Between July 2006 and February 2009, 106 patients were enrolled. The PFS in gemcitabine and S-1 combination arm was significantly longer than in gemcitabine arm (5.4 vs 3.6 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (P=0.036). Overall survival (OS) for gemcitabine and S-1 combination was longer than that for gemcitabine monotherapy (13.5 vs 8.8 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.72 (P=0.104). Overall, grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar in both arms.

Conclusion:

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy demonstrated longer PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. Improved OS duration of 4.7 months was found for gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy, though this was not statistically significant.

Pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 for resectable pancreatic cancer

Results of surgery alone for pancreatic cancer are disappointing. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine and oral S-1 in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. A total of 34 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, radiologically diagnosed preoperatively as having potentially resectable tumors, underwent pancreatic resection with lymphadenectomy at Kanazawa University Hospital. NAC was administered to 13 patients (NAC group). The remaining 21 patients were surgically treated without preoperative chemotherapy (control group). Surgical results were compared between these two groups, with follow-up for at least 24 months. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinicopathological background data (tumor location, age, gender, lymph node metastases, tumor stage and tumor size) between the NAC and control groups. Following preoperative chemotherapy, no patients were judged to be unable to undergo laparotomy, i.e., neither distant metastasis nor tumor progression was observed. Radiologically, all 13 NAC group patients had stable disease, whereas, histopathologically, all tumor specimens showed evidence of tumor cells. The treatment effect was judged by Evans grading to be grade IIa in 11 patients and grade IIb in 2 patients. Toxicity was evaluated in 11 patients. Grade III side effects were regarded as hematological toxicity, i.e., leucopenia (7.7%) and thrombocytopenia (15.4%). Moreover, the incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the NAC and control groups. The one- and three-year overall survival rates of the NAC group with pancreatic head cancer were 88.9 and 55.6%, respectively, superior to 88.9 and 29.6% in the control group (p=0.055). Therefore, NAC with gemcitabine and S-1 is well tolerated and potentially effective against pancreatic head cancer. A phase I study of NAC with gemcitabine and S-1 is under way in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with refractory pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy on refractory pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer refractory to gemcitabine and S-1 were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² over 30 min and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² over 120 min on days 1 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks and tumor response was assessed every two cycles by RECIST version 1.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The treatment was administered as a second-line chemotherapy in eighteen patients (82%) and as a third-line chemotherapy in four patients (18%). Tumor response did not occur in any of the cases. Thirteen patients demonstrated stable diseases, and the disease control rate was 59%. Median overall survival and time to progression were 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-11.5) and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-3.8), respectively. Median overall survival from the first-line chemotherapy was 22.7 months (95% CI, 14.8-24.4). The major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (14%), anorexia (23%), and peripheral neuropathy (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy was tolerable but had limited activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a refractory setting.

Contribution of thymidylate synthase to gemcitabine therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

Thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors activate human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. We evaluated the contribution of TS expression to determine a treatment method providing an effect from gemcitabine (GEM).

METHODS

The expression of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and GEM metabolic factors (5-FU: TS, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase; GEM: human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, deoxycytidine kinase, cytidine deaminase, 5'-nucleotidase) were studied in 7 pancreatic cancer cell lines by Western blotting, and drug resistance was evaluated by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol]-2,5-dephenyl tetrazolium bromide assay. The expression of 5-FU factors was observed immunohistochemically in resected pancreatic cancer specimens.

RESULTS

Gemcitabine concentrations that inhibited colony formation by 50% correlated with TS protein expression (P = 0.0169). With a 5-FU non-growth-inhibiting dose, GEM concentrations that inhibited colony formation by 50% were significantly reduced by one fourth to one tenth. Knockout of TS expression by small interfering RNA decreased resistance to GEM in the cell lines (P = 0.0019). Immunohistochemically, TS expression related to disease-free survival time of patients treated with GEM (P = 0.0224). A high expression of 5-FU factors was detected: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase: differentiated cases (P = 0.0137), lower T factor (P = 0.0411); dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase: nerve invasion (P = 0.0188), lymph node recurrence (P = 0.0253); TS, positive N factor (P = 0.0061).

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of TS provides an alternative source of substrate for DNA synthesis and positively correlates with GEM resistance and shortened patient survival.

Impact of S-1 on the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of S-1 on the prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In total, 112 patients with pancreatic cancer who received chemotherapy between April 2001 and April 2007 were divided into 2 groups: PreS-1 (53 patients who started chemotherapy before January 2005) and PostS-1 (59 patients who started chemotherapy after February 2005, the time of S-1 introduction). Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. S-1 was administered as a second-line monotherapy in 5.7% of the PreS-1 group and combined with gemcitabine as a first-line therapy in 27.1% or as second-line monotherapy in 23.7% in the PostS-1 group. Both progression-free survival and overall survival improved after introduction of S-1 (median progression-free survival, 4.4 and 5.3 months; P = 0.043; median overall survival, 9.5 and 13.1 months; P = 0.048 in PreS-1 and PostS-1 groups, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the PostS-1 group (hazards ratio, 0.52; P = 0.003), performance status, and carcinoembryonic antigen were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of S-1 may improve the prognosis of Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Plasma pharmacokinetics after combined therapy of gemcitabine and oral S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer

Background

The combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative, has been shown to be a promising regimen for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Six patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this pharmacokinetics (PK) study. These patients were treated by oral administration of S-1 30 mg/m² twice daily for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day rest period and intravenous administration of GEM 800 mg/m² on days 1, 15 and 29 of each course. The PK parameters of GEM and/or 5-FU after GEM single-administration, S-1 single-administration, and co-administration of GEM with pre-administration of S-1 at 2-h intervals were analyzed.

Results

The maximum concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from the drug administration to the infinite time (AUCinf), and the elimination half-life (T1/2) of GEM were not significantly different between GEM administration with and without S-1. The Cmax, AUCinf, T1/2, and the time required to reach Cmax (Tmax) were not significantly different between S-1 administration with and without GEM.

Conclusion

There were no interactions between GEM and S-1 regarding plasma PK of GEM and 5-FU.

In vitro and in vivo evidence that a combination of lapatinib plus S-1 is a promising treatment for pancreatic cancer

Lapatinib is a small molecule inhibitor of both HER2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We investigated the effect of treatment with lapatinib alone or in combination with a fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 against pancreatic cancer. The HER2/EGFR expression in each of the four pancreatic cancer cell lines MiaPaca-2, PANC-1, Capan-1 and Capan-2 was measured by flow cytometry. The anti-tumor effects of lapatinib (30 mg/kg) and/or S-1 (10 mg/kg) were evaluated using female BALB/c nude mice xenografts generated using these four cell lines. Synergy between lapatinib and S-1 was examined by median effect analysis in vitro. Resected pancreatic cancer tissues from 137 patients were immunohistochemically stained with anti-human HER2 and EGFR antibodies. The administration of lapatinib as a single agent substantially suppressed tumor growth in vivo of all pancreatic cancer cell lines examined. A strong correlation was observed between HER2 expression and the anti-tumor effect of lapatinib in vivo. Lapatinib synergized with S-1 to inhibit the tumor growth of MiaPaca-2 and PANC-1 xenografts. When used as a single agent in vitro, lapatinib barely inhibit the cell growth of any cell line. However, lapatinib synergized with the anti-tumor activity of the S-1 components 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydrogenase against all cell lines. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that 70% of the pancreatic cancers overexpressed HER2 and/or EGFR. Both lapatinib monotherapy and combined treatment with S-1 may be promising treatments for patients with pancreatic cancers; the majority these cancers express lapatinib target molecules.

A multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:527-536. [PMID: 19578850 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1059-9]

PURPOSE

To confirm the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy when used as a first-line therapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which was histologically or cytologically proven, with at least one measurable lesion were eligible for the study. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 was intravenously given over 30 min on days 1 and 8, while S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was orally given twice daily from day 1 to 14, and the cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The objective response rate, which was assessed according to RECIST criteria, was the primary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were enrolled between June 2006 and June 2007. The median number of treatment courses was 5.5 (range 1-22). Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response. Although no complete response was seen, partial responses were achieved in 11 patients, resulting in an overall response rate of 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-48%]. The median response duration was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.6-8.3 months), the median time-to-progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.9-8.0 months), and the median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI 5.7-11.1 months). The major grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (39.5%), leukopenia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (2.6%), and anemia (7.9%). The major grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included anorexia (10.5%), stomatitis (2.6%), rash (7.9%), fatigue (7.9%) and hyperbilirubinemia (5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy was effective and tolerable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

S-1 and gemcitabine as an outpatient-based regimen in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The standard beneficial chemotherapy proved for patients with pancreatic cancer is a regimen containing gemcitabine. Novel oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, can be added to gemcitabine to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy and to provide better convenience for patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus gemcitabine combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, bidimensionally measurable advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer were eligible for the study. Chemotherapy consisted of S-1 (30 mg/m(2) p.o. bid from Day 1 to 14) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 8 and 15) every 3 weeks based on the results of a previously reported Phase I trial. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

From January 2005 to August 2007, 22 patients were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (range, 50-73). Nineteen patients (86.3%) had metastases and of these, 11 patients (57.9%) had multiple liver metastases. The overall response rate was 27.3% (95% CI, 8.7-45.9), with a partial response in six patients, stable disease in nine (40.9%) and progressive disease in seven (31.8%). With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the median time to progression and overall survival were 4.6 (95% CI, 2-7.2 months) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.1 months), respectively, and 1-year survival rate was 27.3%. S-1 plus gemcitabine was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (9.1/9.1%) and anemia (4.5/0%). Non-hematological adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal events. Twenty patients (91%) received chemotherapy on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy of S-1 plus gemcitabine appears to be active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.

A phase II study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

This open-label, multicenter phase II study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus gemcitabine combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 63 patients who received capecitabine 830 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-21 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients had partial responses giving an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-34%) in the intent-to-treat population. The median time to progression and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI 3.5-5.7) and 7.5 months (95% CI 5.0-10.0), respectively, and 1-year survival rate was 27.1% in the intent-to-treat population. Capecitabine plus gemcitabine was well tolerated. Grade 3 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (2%); the only grade 4 hematological events were anemia (2%) and neutropenia (6%). Non-hematological adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal events and hand-foot syndrome, which affected 16% of patients. Grade 3/4 non-hematological events were infrequent.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine plus gemcitabine appears to be active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer: a review of recent advances

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Despite the advances of the molecular pathogenesis, pancreatic cancer remains a major unsolved health problem. Overall, the 5-year survival rate is < 5% and only approximately 20% of the 10% of patients with resectable disease survive 5 years. Recently, the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 trial demonstrated substantially increased survival from adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid and preliminary data showed prolonged disease-free survival from adjuvant gemcitabine. Current palliative therapeutic approaches mostly focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with a second cytotoxic agent. Recently, large randomised trials of combinations of gemcitabine with either capecitabine or with erlotinib demonstrated prolonged survival and 1-year survival rates of approximately 25%. The advance of molecular biology has led to the elucidation of molecular events that are important for pancreatic carcinogenesis and has provided a foundation for the development of novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents that appear to be promising and are likely to play a future role in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Phase II trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer

We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1, oral fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur combined with two modulators, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate, to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) patients. Patients who had pathologically proven pancreatic cancer with metastatic lesions were eligible candidates for entry into the study. S-1 was given orally (30 mg m⁻²) b.i.d. for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg m⁻²) was given on days 8 and 15. The cycle was repeated every 21 days. We enrolled 33 MPC patients. The median number of cycles was eight (range 1–20). Grade 3–4 toxicities were leucopenia (33%), neutropenia (55%), anaemia (9%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anorexia (6%), fever (9%), and interstitial pneumonia (6%). Objective responses were obtained in 16 patients (one complete response and 15 partial responses; response rate, 48%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 33–65). Median survival and 1-year survival rate were 12.5 months (95% CI, 5.9–19.1) and 54% (95% CI, 36–72), respectively. Combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 was well tolerated and yielded a significantly high response rate.