1
|
van Bommel MHD, IntHout J, Veldmate G, Kets CM, de Hullu JA, van Altena AM, Harmsen MG. Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:197-217. [PMID: 36383189 PMCID: PMC9976973 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of BReast CAncer (BRCA) 1 or 2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers, who have an inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, are being identified. Among these women, data regarding the effects of contraception on cancer risks are unclear and various guidelines provide various recommendations. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We aim to optimize counselling regarding contraception for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We investigated the risk ratio for developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-PV carriers who have used any form of contraception versus non-users. Second, we analysed breast and ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2-PV carriers as influenced by the duration of contraceptive use and by the time since last use. In addition, we provide an overview of all relevant international guidelines regarding contraceptive use for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. SEARCH METHODS A systematic search in the Medline database and Cochrane library identified studies describing breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2-PV carriers as modified by contraception until June 2021. The search included medical subject headings, keywords and synonyms related to BRCA and contraceptives (any kind). PRISMA guidance was followed. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessments were performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled effects for breast and ovarian cancer risk separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted for BRCA1 versus BRCA2 and for the various contraceptive methods. OUTCOMES Results of the breast cancer risk with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) analysis depended on the outcome measure. Meta-analyses of seven studies with 7525 women revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.76) and of four studies including 9106 women resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.90-1.25), heterogeneity (I2) 0% and 52%, respectively. Breast cancer risk was still increased in ever-users compared with never-users >10 years after last OCP use. In contrast, ovarian cancer risk was decreased among OCP users: HR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.74) based on two studies including 10 981 women (I2: 0%), and OR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63) based on eight studies including 10 390 women (I2: 64%). The protective effect vanished after cessation of use. Tubal ligation also protects against ovarian cancer: one study including 3319 women (I2: 0%): HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and three studies with 7691 women (I2: 44%): OR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-1.03). Data regarding other contraceptives were unavailable. No differences were observed between BRCA1 and BRCA2-PV carriers. The quality of evidence was either low or very low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The OCP potentially increases breast cancer risk, while ovarian cancer risk decreases with either the OCP and tubal ligation in BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Counselling of BRCA1/2-PV carriers should be personalized; the genetic and non-genetic factors (like prior risk-reducing surgeries, prior breast cancer and age) and patients' preferences (reversibility, ease of use, reliability and effect on menstrual cycle) should be balanced. To further optimize counselling for high-risk women, future research should focus on other (commonly used) contraceptive methods and cancer risks in this specific population, and on the potential impact of changing formulations over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Guus Veldmate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - C Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Xholli A, Azioni G, Di Vora R, Paudice M, Bucimazza I, Cedolini C, Cagnacci A. Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041422. [PMID: 36835955 PMCID: PMC9967164 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This narrative review aims to clarify the role of breast and gynecological risk-reduction surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. We examine the indications, contraindications, complications, technical aspects, timing, economic impact, ethical issues, and prognostic benefits of the most common prophylactic surgical options from the perspectives of a breast surgeon and a gynecologist. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The databases were explored from their inceptions to August 2022. Three independent reviewers screened the items and selected those most relevant to this review's scope. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are significantly more likely to develop breast, ovarian, and serous endometrial cancer. Because of the Angelina effect, there has been a significant increase in bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) since 2013. BRRM and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) significantly reduce the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. RRSO has significant side effects, including an impact on fertility and early menopause (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction). Hormonal therapy can help with these symptoms. Because of the lower risk of developing breast cancer in the residual mammary gland tissue after BRRM, estrogen-only treatments have an advantage over an estrogen/progesterone combined treatment. Risk-reducing hysterectomy allows for estrogen-only treatments and lowers the risk of endometrial cancer. Although prophylactic surgery reduces the cancer risk, it has disadvantages associated with early menopause. A multidisciplinary team must carefully inform the woman who chooses this path of the broad spectrum of implications, from cancer risk reduction to hormonal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Bertozzi
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Ambrogio P. Londero
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anjeza Xholli
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Azioni
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Vora
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
| | - Michele Paudice
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Ines Bucimazza
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
| | - Carla Cedolini
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Angelo Cagnacci
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Puthanmadhom Narayanan S, Najjar YG. Hereditary Cancer Syndromes-A Broader Clinical Spectrum Than Previously Understood? JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1698-1699. [PMID: 36048458 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yana G Najjar
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MH, Bulten J, Hulsmann JA, Bogaerts J, Garcia C, Cun HT, Lu KH, van Beekhuizen HJ, Minig L, Gaarenstroom KN, Nobbenhuis M, Krajc M, Rudaitis V, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Mourits MJ, Massuger LF, Hoogerbrugge N, Hermens RP, IntHout J, de Hullu JA. Risk of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1879-1891. [PMID: 35302882 PMCID: PMC9851686 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers have a residual risk to develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). The etiology of PC is not yet clarified, but may be related to serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the postulated origin for high-grade serous cancer. In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we investigate the risk of PC in women with and without STIC at RRSO. METHODS Unpublished data from three centers were supplemented by studies identified in a systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library describing women with a BRCA-PV with and without STIC at RRSO until September 2020. Primary outcome was the hazard ratio for the risk of PC between BRCA-PV carriers with and without STIC at RRSO, and the corresponding 5- and 10-year risks. Primary analysis was based on a one-stage Cox proportional-hazards regression with a frailty term for study. RESULTS From 17 studies, individual patient data were available for 3,121 women, of whom 115 had a STIC at RRSO. The estimated hazard ratio to develop PC during follow-up in women with STIC was 33.9 (95% CI, 15.6 to 73.9), P < .001) compared with women without STIC. For women with STIC, the five- and ten-year risks to develop PC were 10.5% (95% CI, 6.2 to 17.2) and 27.5% (95% CI, 15.6 to 43.9), respectively, whereas the corresponding risks were 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.4) for women without STIC at RRSO. CONCLUSION BRCA-PV carriers with STIC at RRSO have a strongly increased risk to develop PC which increases over time, although current data are limited by small numbers of events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P. Steenbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,Miranda P. Steenbeek, MD, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; e-mail:
| | - Majke H.D. van Bommel
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia A. Hulsmann
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joep Bogaerts
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christine Garcia
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Gynecologic Oncology San Francisco, San Francisco CA
| | - Han T. Cun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heleen J. van Beekhuizen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas Minig
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IMED Hospitales, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katja N. Gaarenstroom
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle Nobbenhuis
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gynaecology, London, England
| | - Mateja Krajc
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Clinical Genetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vilius Rudaitis
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Marian J.E. Mourits
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F.A.G. Massuger
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella P.M.G. Hermens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A. de Hullu
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Bommel MHD, Steenbeek MP, IntHout J, Hermens RPMG, Hoogerbrugge N, Harmsen MG, van Doorn HC, Mourits MJE, van Beurden M, Zweemer RP, Gaarenstroom KN, Slangen BFM, Brood-van Zanten MMA, Vos MC, Piek JM, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Apperloo MJA, Coppus SFPJ, Prins JB, Custers JAE, de Hullu JA. Cancer worry among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing surgery to prevent tubal/ovarian cancer: course over time and associated factors. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3409-3418. [PMID: 34997316 PMCID: PMC8857097 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06726-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective High cancer risks, as applicable to BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers, can induce significant cancer concerns. We examined the degree of cancer worry and the course of this worry among BRCA1/2-PV carriers undergoing surgery to prevent ovarian cancer, and identified factors associated with high cancer worry. Methods Cancer worry was evaluated as part of the multicentre, prospective TUBA-study (NCT02321228) in which BRCA1/2-PV carriers choose either novel risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy or standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. The Cancer Worry Scale was obtained before and 3 and 12 months after surgery. Cancer worry patterns were analysed using latent class growth analysis and associated factors were identified with regression analysis. Results Of all 577 BRCA1/2-PV carriers, 320 (57%) had high (≥ 14) cancer worry pre-surgery, and 54% had lower worry 12 months post-surgery than pre-surgery. Based on patterns over time, BRCA1/2-PV carriers could be classified into three groups: persistently low cancer worry (56%), persistently high cancer worry (6%), and fluctuating, mostly declining, cancer worry (37%). Factors associated with persistently high cancer concerns were age below 35 (BRCA1) or 40 (BRCA2), unemployment, previous breast cancer, lower education and a more recent BRCA1/2-PV diagnosis. Conclusions Some degree of cancer worry is considered normal, and most BRCA1/2-PV carriers have declining cancer worry after gynaecological risk-reducing surgery. However, a subset of these BRCA1/2-PV carriers has persisting major cancer concerns up to 1 year after surgery. They should be identified and potentially offered additional support. Clinical trial registration The TUBA-study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov since December 11th, 2014. Registration number: NCT02321228. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06726-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Miranda P Steenbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique M A Brood-van Zanten
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), AmsterdamUMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Gynaecologic Oncologic Center South Location Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000 LC, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M Piek
- Gynaecologic Oncologic Center South Location Catharina Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), AmsterdamUMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam J A Apperloo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Sjors F P J Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Center, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute F Or Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - José A E Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute F Or Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grandi G, Fiocchi F, Cortesi L, Toss A, Boselli F, Sammarini M, Sighinolfi G, Facchinetti F. The challenging screen detection of ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers adhering to a 6-month follow-up program: results from a 6-years surveillance. Menopause 2021; 29:63-72. [PMID: 34726192 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately 25% of ovarian cancer (OC) cases are related to an inherited predisposition. Genetic mutations for the oncosuppressor genes BRCA1 and 2 have the best-known linkage to a higher incidence of OC and breast cancer, in approximately 70% to 80% of hereditary OC cases. To provide the first comprehensive clinical description of screen-detected (SD) OCs during a 6-years surveillance of a cohort of young BRCA carriers and carriers who refuse risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. METHODS A prospective cohort study in a university hospital describing 191 women with BRCA1 and 2 mutations adhering continuously to our surveillance between 2015 and 2020, including a 6-monthly evaluation of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) with concomitant transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) performed by a dedicated specialist. Main outcomes were tumor's laterality, CA 125 at diagnosis, TVUS and computed tomography (CT) findings. RESULTS Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 58/191 (30.4%) of mutation carriers during the study period (one OC case identified). Nine SD-OCs and no interval OCs were found in the remaining 133 women. OCs (FIGO stage I or II: 88.9%) occur mainly in BRCA 1 (77.8%), being bilateral in 85.7% BRCA 1 and unilateral in 100% BRCA 2. No lesions involved only the tubes: left ovaries/tubes were more frequently involved. We have described three new possible scenarios regarding imaging: 1) Evident cases (33.3%, TVUS and CT obvious for OC, CA 125 sensitivity: 100%), 2) Possible cases (55.6%, TVUS and CT are in general accordance, documenting new TVUS signs: increased solid pattern of the ovary with peripheral cortical small cysts, hypoechoic circular mass near the ovary, intraparenchymal small hyperechoic foci), and 3) Hidden cases (11.1%, the smallest lesion but the highest stage (IIIA2), with CA 125 44.2 U/mL and concomitant endometrial hyperplasia). CONCLUSIONS Different diagnostic tools must integrate to ensure early diagnosis of OC in BRCA mutation carriers adhering to a follow-up program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Grandi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Federica Fiocchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Fausto Boselli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Margaret Sammarini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Giovanna Sighinolfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Facchinetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, Harmsen MG, Hoogerbrugge N, van Doorn HC, Keurentjes JHM, van Beurden M, Zweemer RP, Gaarenstroom KN, Penders CGJ, Brood-van Zanten MMA, Vos MC, Piek JM, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Apperloo MJA, Coppus SFPJ, IntHout J, de Hullu JA, Hermens RPMG. Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:371-377. [PMID: 34456057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing surgery is advised to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers around the age of 40 years to reduce ovarian cancer risk. In the TUBA-study, a multicenter preference study (NCT02321228), BRCA1/2-PV carriers are offered a choice: the standard strategy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or the novel strategy of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy. We evaluated feasibility and effectiveness of a patient decision aid for this choice. METHODS Premenopausal BRCA1/2-PV carriers were counselled for risk-reducing surgical options in the TUBA-study; the first cohort was counselled without and the second cohort with decision aid. Evaluation was performed using digital questionnaires for participating women and their healthcare professionals. Outcome measures included actual choice, feasibility (usage and experiences) and effectiveness (knowledge, cancer worry, decisional conflict, decisional regret and self-estimated influence on decision). RESULTS 283 women were counselled without and 282 women with decision aid. The novel strategy was chosen less frequently in women without compared with women with decision aid (67% vs 78%, p = 0.004). The decision aid was graded with an 8 out of 10 by both women and professionals, and 78% of the women would recommend this decision aid to others. Users of the decision aid reported increased knowledge about the options and increased insight in personal values. Knowledge on cancer risk, decisional conflict, decisional regret and cancer worry were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The use of the patient decision aid for risk-reducing surgery is feasible, effective and highly appreciated among BRCA1/2-PV carriers facing the decision between salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P Steenbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Majke H D van Bommel
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Marline G Harmsen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, 's, Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José H M Keurentjes
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Centre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte G J Penders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Monique M A Brood-van Zanten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000, LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M Piek
- Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam J A Apperloo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934, AD, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Sjors F P J Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, 5504, DB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steenbeek MP, Harmsen MG, Hoogerbrugge N, de Jong MA, Maas AHEM, Prins JB, Bulten J, Teerenstra S, van Bommel MHD, van Doorn HC, Mourits MJE, van Beurden M, Zweemer RP, Gaarenstroom KN, Slangen BFM, Brood-van Zanten MMA, Vos MC, Piek JMJ, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Apperloo MJA, Coppus SFPJ, Massuger LFAG, IntHout J, Hermens RPMG, de Hullu JA. Association of Salpingectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy Versus Salpingo-oophorectomy With Quality of Life in BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1203-1212. [PMID: 34081085 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Most women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergo premature menopause with potential short- and long-term morbidity due to the current method of ovarian carcinoma prevention: risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Because the fallopian tubes play a key role in ovarian cancer pathogenesis, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy may be a novel risk-reducing strategy with benefits of delaying menopause. Objective To compare menopause-related quality of life after risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) with delayed oophorectomy with RRSO in carriers of the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Design, Setting, and Participants A multicenter nonrandomized controlled preference trial (TUBA study), with patient recruitment between January 16, 2015, and November 7, 2019, and follow-up at 3 and 12 months after surgery was conducted in all Dutch university hospitals and a few large general hospitals. In the Netherlands, RRSO is predominantly performed in these hospitals. Patients at the clinical genetics or gynecology department between the ages of 25 and 40 years (BRCA1) or 25 to 45 years (BRCA2) who were premenopausal, had completed childbearing, and were undergoing no current treatment for cancer were eligible. Interventions Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at currently recommended age or RRS after completed childbearing with delayed oophorectomy. After RRSO was performed, hormone replacement therapy was recommended for women without contraindications. Main Outcomes and Measures Menopause-related quality of life as assessed by the Greene Climacteric Scale, with a higher scale sum (range, 0-63) representing more climacteric symptoms. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, sexual functioning and distress, cancer worry, decisional regret, and surgical outcomes. Results A total of 577 women (mean [SD] age, 37.2 [3.5] years) were enrolled: 297 (51.5%) were pathogenic BRCA1 variant carriers and 280 (48.5%) were BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. At the time of analysis, 394 patients had undergone RRS and 154 had undergone RRSO. Without hormone replacement therapy, the adjusted mean increase from the baseline score on the Greene Climacteric Scale was 6.7 (95% CI, 5.0-8.4; P < .001) points higher during 1 year after RRSO than after RRS. After RRSO with hormone replacement therapy, the difference was 3.6 points (95% CI, 2.3-4.8; P < .001) compared with RRS. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that patients have better menopause-related quality of life after RRS than after RRSO, regardless of hormone replacement therapy. An international follow-up study is currently evaluating the oncologic safety of this therapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02321228.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P Steenbeek
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marline G Harmsen
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke Arts de Jong
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Angela H E M Maas
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Majke H D van Bommel
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Centre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Monique M A Brood-van Zanten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AmsterdamUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M J Piek
- Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mirjam J A Apperloo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Sjors F P J Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haque R, Skates SJ, Armstrong MA, Lentz SE, Anderson M, Jiang W, Alvarado MM, Chillemi G, Shaw SF, Kushi LH, Powell CB. Feasibility, patient compliance and acceptability of ovarian cancer surveillance using two serum biomarkers and Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm compared to standard ultrasound and CA 125 among women with BRCA mutations. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:521-528. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
10
|
D'Alonzo M, Piva E, Pecchio S, Liberale V, Modaffari P, Ponzone R, Biglia N. Satisfaction and Impact on Quality of Life of Clinical and Instrumental Surveillance and Prophylactic Surgery in BRCA-mutation Carriers. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e1361-e1366. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
11
|
Campo-Engelstein L. BRCA Previvors: Medical and Social Factors That Differentiate Them From Previvors With Other Hereditary Cancers. BIOÉTHIQUEONLINE 2018. [DOI: 10.7202/1044611ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, I outline some of the reasons why BRCA “previvors” (i.e., “survivors of a predisposition to cancer”) are different from previvors with other hereditary cancers. I examine how the absence of a standard of care for breast cancer risk for women with a BRCA mutation, coupled with a broad range of genetic penetrance and lower mortality, makes BRCA different than other hereditary cancers that have clear and established guidelines. In addition to these medical differences, social factors like the cultural prominence of breast cancer and the social significance of breasts have engendered a more complicated individual previvor identity for and cultural response to women with a BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Campo-Engelstein
- Alden March Bioethics Institute, OBGYN Department, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doutriaux-Dumoulin I. Suivi des patientes porteuses d’une mutation des gènes BRCA1 et 2 : recommandations de l’InCa 2017. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.femme.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is an inherited cancer-susceptibility syndrome characterized by multiple family members with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or both. Based on the contemporary understanding of the origins and management of ovarian cancer and for simplicity in this document, ovarian cancer also refers to fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer. Clinical genetic testing for gene mutations allows more precise identification of those women who are at an increased risk of inherited breast cancer and ovarian cancer. For these individuals, screening and prevention strategies can be instituted to reduce their risks. Obstetrician-gynecologists play an important role in the identification and management of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. If an obstetrician-gynecologist or other gynecologic care provider does not have the necessary knowledge or expertise in cancer genetics to counsel a patient appropriately, referral to a genetic counselor, gynecologic or medical oncologist, or other genetics specialist should be considered (1). More genes are being discovered that impart varying risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other types of cancer, and new technologies are being developed for genetic testing. This Practice Bulletin focuses on the primary genetic mutations associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also will briefly discuss some of the other genes that have been implicated.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liang MI, Wong DH, Walsh CS, Farias-Eisner R, Cohen JG. Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:177-186. [PMID: 28785836 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0135-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Multi-gene panel testing has expanded the genetic information available to cancer patients. The objective was to assess provider behaviors and attitudes and patient knowledge and attitudes towards genetic counseling and testing. An online survey was distributed to Society of Gynecologic Oncology members and a written questionnaire was administered to patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at a tertiary care referral center. Most of the 233 (18% response rate) provider respondents were gynecologic oncologists. Access to a genetic counselor was reported by 87% of providers and 55% deferred all testing to genetic counselors. Of 53 ovarian cancer patient respondents, two-thirds had previously seen a genetic counselor or undergone testing. Patients' attitudes about genetic counseling and/or testing were favorable with respect to themselves (70-81%) and their family members (94%). Less than 25% of patients indicated worrying about health care discrimination, lack of privacy, or high cost. Seventy-seven percent of patients demonstrated a desire to obtain genetic information even if the results were not currently actionable, and 20% of providers stated they test for only those genes with guideline-supported actionable results. Provider practice differences were identified in screening and prevention strategies for patients with deleterious non-BRCA mutations and variants of uncertain significance. The variation in clinical interpretation of results associated with poorly defined cancer risks signals a need for more comprehensive training and guidelines to ensure access to evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CHS Room 27-139, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Deanna H Wong
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CHS Room 27-139, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Christine S Walsh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robin Farias-Eisner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CHS Room 27-139, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Joshua G Cohen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CHS Room 27-139, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moghadasi S, Meeks HD, Vreeswijk MP, Janssen LA, Borg Å, Ehrencrona H, Paulsson-Karlsson Y, Wappenschmidt B, Engel C, Gehrig A, Arnold N, Hansen TVO, Thomassen M, Jensen UB, Kruse TA, Ejlertsen B, Gerdes AM, Pedersen IS, Caputo SM, Couch F, Hallberg EJ, van den Ouweland AM, Collée MJ, Teugels E, Adank MA, van der Luijt RB, Mensenkamp AR, Oosterwijk JC, Blok MJ, Janin N, Claes KB, Tucker K, Viassolo V, Toland AE, Eccles DE, Devilee P, Van Asperen CJ, Spurdle AB, Goldgar DE, García EG. The BRCA1 c. 5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) intermediate risk variant: breast and ovarian cancer risk estimation and recommendations for clinical management from the ENIGMA consortium. J Med Genet 2017; 55:15-20. [PMID: 28490613 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers. METHODS Data were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions. RESULTS In this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83). CONCLUSION Our results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setareh Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Huong D Meeks
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Maaike Pg Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Am Janssen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Laboratory Medicine, Office for Medical Services, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Centre of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Centre of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Department of Medical Genetics, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Arnold
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Van Overeem Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torben A Kruse
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Søkilde Pedersen
- Section of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Fergus Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Emily J Hallberg
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Margriet J Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Teugels
- Familial Cancer Clinic and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium
| | - Muriel A Adank
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob B van der Luijt
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Blok
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Janin
- Department of Service de Génétique, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Service, Prince of Wales (and St George Hospitals) Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Valeria Viassolo
- Department of Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Diana E Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christie J Van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David E Goldgar
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Encarna Gómez García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van der Aa JE, Hoogendam JP, Butter ESF, Ausems MGEM, Verheijen RHM, Zweemer RP. The effect of personal medical history and family history of cancer on the uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Fam Cancer 2016; 14:539-44. [PMID: 26264902 PMCID: PMC4630248 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9827-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Women with an increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer are advised to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to reduce risk of adnexal cancer. We investigated the uptake of RRSO and evaluated the influence of personal medical history of (breast) cancer, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer on the RRSO decision. This single center retrospective observational cohort study was performed in a tertiary multidisciplinary clinic for hereditary cancer of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Women ≥35 years old with an estimated lifetime risk of ovarian cancer ≥10%, who had completed childbearing, were eligible for RRSO. Uptake and timing of RRSO were analyzed. Influence of personal medical history and family history on RRSO decision making, were evaluated with logistic regression. The study population consisted of 218 women (45.0% BRCA1 mutation carrier, 28.0% BRCA2 mutation carrier, 27.0% with familial susceptibility) with 87.2% RRSO uptake. The median age at RRSO was 44.5 (range 28-73) years. Of the women undergoing RRSO, 78.3% needed ≤3 consultations to reach this decision. Multivariable analysis showed a significant difference in RRSO uptake for women with a history of RRM [OR 3.66 95% CI (1.12-11.98)], but no significant difference in women with a history of breast cancer [OR 1.38 95% CI (0.50-3.79)], nor with a family history of ovarian and/or breast cancer [OR 1.10 95% CI (0.44-2.76)]. We conclude that RRSO counseling, without the alternative of screening, is effective. The uptake is increased in women with a history of RRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E van der Aa
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Els S F Butter
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - René H M Verheijen
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Selmes G, Ferron G, Filleron T, Querleu D, Mery E. Lésions épithéliales précoces dans les annexectomies prophylactiques chez des patientes à haut risque de cancer de l’ovaire : à propos d’une série de 93 cas. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 43:659-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
18
|
Harmsen MG, Arts-de Jong M, Hoogerbrugge N, Maas AHEM, Prins JB, Bulten J, Teerenstra S, Adang EMM, Piek JMJ, van Doorn HC, van Beurden M, Mourits MJE, Zweemer RP, Gaarenstroom KN, Slangen BFM, Vos MC, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Massuger LFAG, Hermens RPMG, de Hullu JA. Early salpingectomy (TUbectomy) with delayed oophorectomy to improve quality of life as alternative for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (TUBA study): a prospective non-randomised multicentre study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:593. [PMID: 26286255 PMCID: PMC4541725 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1597-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) around the age of 40 is currently recommended to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. This procedure decreases the elevated ovarian cancer risk by 80–96 % but it initiates premature menopause as well. The latter is associated with short-term and long-term morbidity, potentially affecting quality of life (QoL). Based on recent insights into the Fallopian tube as possible site of origin of serous ovarian carcinomas, an alternative preventive strategy has been put forward: early risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) and delayed oophorectomy (RRO). However, efficacy and safety of this alternative strategy have to be investigated. Methods A multicentre non-randomised trial in 11 Dutch centres for hereditary cancer will be conducted. Eligible patients are premenopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers after completing childbearing without (a history of) ovarian carcinoma. Participants choose between standard RRSO at age 35–40 (BRCA1) or 40–45 (BRCA2) and the alternative strategy (RRS upon completion of childbearing and RRO at age 40–45 (BRCA1) or 45–50 (BRCA2)). Women who opt for RRS but do not want to postpone RRO beyond the currently recommended age are included as well. Primary outcome measure is menopause-related QoL. Secondary outcome measures are ovarian/breast cancer incidence, surgery-related morbidity, histopathology, cardiovascular risk factors and diseases, and cost-effectiveness. Mixed model data analysis will be performed. Discussion The exact role of the Fallopian tube in ovarian carcinogenesis is still unclear. It is not expected that further fundamental research will elucidate this role in the near future. Therefore, this clinical trial is essential to investigate RRS with delayed RRO as alternative risk-reducing strategy in order to improve QoL. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02321228)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marieke Arts-de Jong
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Angela H E M Maas
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Eddy M M Adang
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurgen M J Piek
- Gynaecologic Oncologic Center South location Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands. .,Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Gynaecologic Oncologic Center South, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Caiata-Zufferey M. Genetically at-risk status and individual agency. A qualitative study on asymptomatic women living with genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer. Soc Sci Med 2015; 132:141-8. [PMID: 25813728 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
For the last 20 years, genetic tests have allowed unaffected women to determine whether they are predisposed to developing breast/ovarian cancer due to BRCA1/2 gene mutations. In the event of adverse results, women receive a specific label associated with a set of medical recommendations: the genetically at-risk status. This qualitative study adopted a life-course perspective to understand the impact of this status on women's agency. Following a grounded theory design, retrospective biographical interviews were conducted in Switzerland between 2011 and 2013 with 32 unaffected women at risk of developing genetic breast/ovarian cancer and aware of their predisposition for at least three years. The results show that the genetically at-risk status conveys an invitation to transform health into a project, i.e., into a set of planned activities realized in collaboration with the medical system in order to reduce the risk of developing cancer. This health project shapes women's agency in three ways: it enhances, constrains and questions it, thus creating a sense of disorientation about what is considered rational and appropriate in terms of genetic risk management. Based on these findings, the paper concludes by stressing the paradoxes of the genetically at-risk status and the limits of the medical system in managing women designated with it. The paper also suggests that because of the disorientation intrinsic to their situation, genetically at-risk women have to reflexively construct their own health project from a range of available options in ways that are coherent and viable for themselves and their significant others. This process of reflexive construction may be called legitimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Caiata-Zufferey
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino 11, 6928 Manno, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Department of Sociology, Bd du Pont-d'Arve 40, 1205 Genève, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ebell MH, Culp M, Lastinger K, Dasigi T. A systematic review of the bimanual examination as a test for ovarian cancer. Am J Prev Med 2015; 48:350-6. [PMID: 25595604 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT An annual bimanual pelvic examination remains widely recommended for healthy women, but its inclusion may discourage attendance. Our goal was to determine the accuracy of the pelvic examination as a screening test for ovarian cancer and to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed was searched to identify studies evaluating the accuracy of the bimanual pelvic examination for ovarian cancer diagnosis. Data regarding study design, study quality, and test accuracy were abstracted. Heterogeneity was evaluated and meta-analysis performed where appropriate, including bivariate receiver operating characteristic curves. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eight studies in screening populations (n=36,599) and seven studies in symptomatic patients (n=782) were identified. Search was completed in November 2013; included studies were published between 1988 and 2009. Screening studies were homogeneous; the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the pelvic examination as a screening test for ovarian cancer were 0.44 and 0.98 (positive likelihood ratio, 24.7; negative likelihood ratio, 0.57). For distinguishing benign versus malignant lesions, there was considerable heterogeneity, with a range of sensitivity from 0.43 to 0.93 and specificity from 0.53 to 0.91. CONCLUSIONS The bimanual pelvic examination lacks accuracy as a screening test for ovarian cancer and as a way to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. In a typical screening population, the positive predictive value of an abnormal pelvic examination is only 1% (95% CI=0.67%, 3.0%). Its inclusion in a health maintenance examination cannot be justified on the basis of using it to screen for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Ebell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - MaryBeth Culp
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
| | - Krista Lastinger
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Tara Dasigi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have greatly elevated lifetime risks of breast, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancers. Bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended to prevent cancer in these women. As it is often performed before natural menopause, it may be accompanied by menopausal symptoms, impaired quality of life, and increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS In this review, we describe the indications, timing, and implications of salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA-positive women, with a special focus on the risks and benefits of hormone therapy (HT). Furthermore, retrospective and prospective trials of HT in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy are debated. RESULTS Hormonal deprivation after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy may negatively impact health and quality of life; most women experience menopausal symptoms shortly after surgical operation. Literature data suggest that HT generally reduces vasomotor symptoms related to surgical menopause, improving sexual functioning without affecting survival. CONCLUSIONS Despite the limitations of retrospective and prospective observational studies, short-term HT seems to improve quality of life and does not seem to have an adverse effect on oncologic outcomes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers without a personal history of breast cancer. Therefore, randomized and larger trials are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen Y, Bancroft E, Ashley S, Arden-Jones A, Thomas S, Shanley S, Saya S, Wakeling E, Eeles R. Baseline and post prophylactic tubal-ovarian surgery CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2014; 13:197-203. [PMID: 24389956 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9697-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have different baseline CA125 levels compared with non-carriers, and whether a significant difference in pre- and post-operative CA125 levels exists in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). The study also considered whether CA125 measurements should continue in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers after RRBSO. 383 Eligible women were identified through retrospective review of the BRCA Carrier Clinic at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. These women all had CA125 levels measured as they were either a carrier or at risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Of these, 76 went on to have a negative predictive test for their familial mutation and so are classed as 'non-carriers'. 133 BRCA1 and 87 BRCA2 carriers had RRBSO, with a further 26 BRCA1 carriers, 28 BRCA2 carriers and one non-carrier developing ovarian cancer. The remaining 21 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 carriers did not have RRBSO or develop ovarian cancer in the time of study follow-up. CA125 levels were measured as surveillance or as part of pre-RRBSO care. CA125 measurement post-RRBSO was continued in 48 BRCA1 and 40 BRCA2 carriers. In 154 BRCA1 mutation carriers, the median baseline (i.e. before RRBSO and with no clinical signs of ovarian cancer) CA125 level was 9.0 U/ml (range 2-78) and was 10.0 U/ml (range 1-43) in 115 BRCA2 mutation carriers. When compared with the 75 non-carriers (median baseline CA125 10.0 U/ml; range 2-52), there was no significant difference between the BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-carrier groups. There was a significant reduction in CA125 from pre- to post-RRBSO in 48 BRCA1 carriers (p = 0.04) but no significant difference in 40 BRCA2 mutation carriers (p = 0.5). Out of a total of 220 mutation carriers who underwent RRBSO, two had an incidental ovarian cancer found on histopathology and another developed primary peritoneal cancer during the follow-up period. Our study is the first to compare initial serum CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with those of non-carriers. Our study found no significant difference between the three groups. A drop in CA125 levels after RRBSO in BRCA1 carriers supports the finding of earlier studies, but differed in that the fall was not seen in BRCA2 carriers. The finding of only one case of post-operative peritoneal cancer in 220 carriers undergoing RRBSO supports the discontinuation of post-RRBSO serum CA125 monitoring in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- North-West Thames Regional Genetics Service (Kennedy-Galton Centre), Level 8V, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Rd, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lynch HT, Snyder C, Casey MJ. Hereditary ovarian and breast cancer: what have we learned? Ann Oncol 2014; 24 Suppl 8:viii83-viii95. [PMID: 24131978 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
An autosomal-dominant inherited trait predisposing women to both breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) was first described in 1971. Subsequent strides were made in identifying mutations in the eventually cloned genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 as being responsible for hereditary BC and OC (HBOC) in many women with early-onset HBOC. More recently, modifiers of BC risk have also been identified and are under study. The biological and molecular genetic pathways for malignant transformation in OC (ovarian epithelium and/or epithelium of the fallopian tube or, possibly, the endometrium and endocervix) remain elusive. The answer to the question 'What have we learned?' which is part of our chapter title unfortunately remains incomplete. However, intensive worldwide research indicates that its malignant transformation is the product of a multi-step process where there is an array of mutations which account for three or more classes of genes, inclusive of proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and mutator genes. This causal uncertainty heralds an enormous clinical-pathology dilemma, given the fact that epithelial OC, together with related Müllerian duct carcinoma, harbor the highest fatality rates of all gynecologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University, Omaha
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gadducci A, Sergiampietri C, Tana R. Alternatives to risk-reducing surgery for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 24 Suppl 8:viii47-viii53. [PMID: 24131970 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have an 18%-60% and 11%-27% lifetime risk of developing ovarian carcinoma, respectively. Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces the risk of this malignancy by up to 96%. Gynecological screening programs with periodical trans-vaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 assay have been widely used in women at hereditary high risk of ovarian carcinoma, but clinical results have been conflicting. These surveillance protocols have often fallen short of expectations because of the advanced stage of ovarian carcinoma in the identified screened women. Several investigations have been addressed to the detection of additional tumor markers able to generate more reliable screening tools. The combined serum assay of leptin, prolactin, osteopontin, CA125, macrophage inhibiting factor and insulin-like growth factor-II appears to have a significant better diagnostic reliability compared with serum CA125 alone in discriminating healthy individuals from ovarian carcinoma patients, and therefore, it could have a role in the screening of women at high risk for this malignancy. As far as chemoprevention is concerned, oral contraceptives significantly reduce the ovarian carcinoma risk also in BRCA mutation carriers, whereas the efficacy of fenretinide is still under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gadducci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Phillips KA, Milne RL, Rookus MA, Daly MB, Antoniou AC, Peock S, Frost D, Easton DF, Ellis S, Friedlander ML, Buys SS, Andrieu N, Noguès C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Bonadona V, Pujol P, McLachlan SA, John EM, Hooning MJ, Seynaeve C, Tollenaar RAEM, Goldgar DE, Terry MB, Caldes T, Weideman PC, Andrulis IL, Singer CF, Birch K, Simard J, Southey MC, Olsson HL, Jakubowska A, Olah E, Gerdes AM, Foretova L, Hopper JL. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:3091-9. [PMID: 23918944 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.47.8313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer (BC) is associated with reduced contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. METHODS Analysis of pooled observational cohort data, self-reported at enrollment and at follow-up from the International BRCA1, and BRCA2 Carrier Cohort Study, Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Family Registry. Eligible women were BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers diagnosed with unilateral BC since 1970 and no other invasive cancer or tamoxifen use before first BC. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CBC associated with tamoxifen use were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for year and age of diagnosis, country, and bilateral oophorectomy and censoring at contralateral mastectomy, death, or loss to follow-up. RESULTS Of 1,583 BRCA1 and 881 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 383 (24%) and 454 (52%), respectively, took tamoxifen after first BC diagnosis. There were 520 CBCs over 20,104 person-years of observation. The adjusted HR estimates were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.55) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.50) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. After left truncating at recruitment to the cohort, adjusted HR estimates were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.13) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.05) based on 657 BRCA1 and 426 BRCA2 mutation carriers with 100 CBCs over 4,392 person-years of prospective follow-up. HRs did not differ by estrogen receptor status of the first BC (missing for 56% of cases). CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that tamoxifen use is associated with a reduction in CBC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further follow-up of these cohorts will provide increased statistical power for future prospective analyses.
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Miesfeldt S, Lamb A, Duarte C. Management of genetic syndromes predisposing to gynecologic cancers. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2013; 14:34-50. [PMID: 23315239 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-012-0215-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Women with personal and family histories consistent with gynecologic cancer-associated hereditary cancer susceptibility disorders should be referred for genetic risk assessment and counseling. Genetic counseling facilitates informed medical decision making regarding genetic testing, screening, and treatment, including chemoprevention and risk-reducing surgery. Because of limitations of ovarian cancer screening, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-affected women are offered risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) between ages 35 and 40 years, or when childbearing is complete. Women with documented Lynch syndrome, associated with mutations in mismatch repair genes, should be screened at a young age and provided prevention options, including consideration of risk-reducing total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO, as well as intensive gastrointestinal screening. Clinicians caring for high-risk women must consider the potential adverse ethical, legal, and social issues associated with hereditary cancer risk assessment and testing. Additionally, at-risk family members should be alerted to their cancer risks, as well as the availability of risk assessment, counseling, and treatment services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Miesfeldt
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Maine Medical Center Cancer Institute, Scarborough, ME 04074, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reitsma W, Mourits MJE, de Bock GH, Hollema H. Endometrium is not the primary site of origin of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Mod Pathol 2013; 26:572-8. [PMID: 23080033 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma has been proposed to be a potential precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma. If true, an increased incidence of uterine papillary serous carcinomas would be expected in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, who are at high-risk of developing pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma. This study explored particularly the occurrence of uterine papillary serous carcinoma, as well as other endometrial cancers, following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation attending a tertiary multidisciplinary clinic. A consecutive series of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy without hysterectomy at the University Medical Center Groningen from January 1996 until March 2012 were followed prospectively. They were crossed with the histopathology list of endometrial cancer diagnoses reported by the Dutch nationwide pathology database PALGA. To assess the risk of endometrial cancer, a standardized incidence ratio was calculated comparing the observed with the expected number of endometrial cancer cases. Overall, 201 BRCA1 and 144 BRCA2 mutation carriers at a median age of 50 years (range, 32-78) were analyzed. After a median follow-up period of 6 years, after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, two cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed, whereas the expected number was 0.94 cases (standardized incidence ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval 0.24-7.69; P=0.27). Both endometrial cancer cases were of the endometrioid histological subtype. We showed that the incidence of endometrial cancer following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, especially uterine papillary serous carcinoma, in women at high-risk of developing pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma is not increased. On the basis of our data, the hypothesis of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma being an important precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma seems unlikely. There is no need to add a prophylactic hysterectomy to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Welmoed Reitsma
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bijron JG, Bol GM, Verheijen RH, van Diest PJ. Epigenetic biomarkers in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 6:421-38. [PMID: 23480807 DOI: 10.1517/17530059.2012.702105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current diagnostic methods for ovarian cancer have limited performance. Recent advances within the field of epigenetics have shifted the clinical implementation of epigenetic biomarkers as a diagnostic approach from a dream for the future to a present-day consideration. Patients could potentially benefit greatly from this novel diagnostic approach. AREAS COVERED Epigenetic mechanisms in cancer are discussed, with a focus on potential diagnostic epigenetic biomarkers in ovarian cancer in tissue and body fluids. A literature search was undertaken (on 22-09-2011) for these subjects using the search syntax ((((((((((((((("ovarian") OR "ovary") OR "ovarian cancer") OR "ovarian cancers") OR "cancer of the ovary") OR "tumour of the ovary") OR "ovarian tumor") OR "ovarian tumors") OR "ovarian tumour") OR "ovarian tumours") OR "ovarian neoplasm") OR "ovarian neoplasms" OR "ovarian carcinoma") OR "ovarian carcinomas") OR "carcinoma of the ovary")) AND ((((((((("epigenetics") OR "epigenetic") OR "epigenome") OR "methylation") OR "hypermethylation") OR "chromatin modification") OR "histone") OR "histones") OR "acetylation") EXPERT OPINION To date no single epigenetic biomarker is able to accurately detect early ovarian cancer in either tissue or body fluids. A panel of epigenetic biomarkers based on aberrant DNA methylation in body fluids, especially blood, has the best chance of being implemented in clinical practice, as it is semi-invasive. However, progression toward clinical use is hampered by the lack of detection techniques combining high throughput and accuracy with low cost, by difficulties in establishing reliable reference values and by the heterogeneous nature of ovarian cancer. Until addressed, implementation as a diagnostic measure complimenting current techniques in select cases seems a far way to go, and implementation as a primary screening tool is yet even farther away.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G Bijron
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Pathology , 3508 GA Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
van Altena AM, Karim-Kos HE, de Vries E, Kruitwagen RF, Massuger LF, Kiemeney LA. Trends in therapy and survival of advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:649-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2011] [Revised: 02/06/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
33
|
Şen S, Kuru O, Akbayır Ö, Oğuz H, Yasasever V, Berkman S. Determination of serum CRP, VEGF, Leptin, CK-MB, CA-15-3 and IL-6 levels for malignancy prediction in adnexal masses. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12:214-9. [PMID: 24591997 PMCID: PMC3939252 DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigation of serum markers which could be used in the malignancy prediction of adnexal masses. MATERIAL AND METHODS Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), leptin, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine-kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) levels were determined prospectively in serum samples that were obtained from patients who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass and who were referred to Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, between 2009 and 2011, and then were compared with the serum samples of completely healthy outpatient patients as a control group. Based onto the ovarian cancer status, cases were divided into four groups: 13 patients were included in the early-stage malignant group, 12 patients were included in the advanced-stage malignant group, 25 in the benign group and 19 in the healthy control group. Patients with only epithelial ovarian cancer were included into the cancer group. Ethics Commitee approval was obtained for this study. The budget was supported by the Istanbul University Scientific Research Projects Unit. RESULTS RESULTS RELATED WITH SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE (PPV), NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE (NPV) AND ODDS RATIO (OR), RESPECTIVELY, AND THE FOLLOWING VALUES WERE CALCULATED: 48%, 95%, 92%, 59% and +OR 9.6 -OR 0.5 for CA; 15-3; 52%, 75%, 72%, 55%, +OR 2.08 -OR 0.64 for leptin; 72%, 70%, 75%, 66% 2.4-0.5 for IL-6; 24%, 80%, 60%, 45%, 1.2-0.92 for VEGF; 68%, 30%, 55%, 43%, 0.97-1.06 for CRP; and 8%, 70%, 25%, 38%, 026-1.31 for CK-MB. CONCLUSION CA 15-3, IL-6, Leptin, VEGF and CRP were effective in the prediction of benign and malignant masses; however they may be more suitable in selected cases as they have a limited use because of their inadequate potential regarding sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Şen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Oğuzhan Kuru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Özgür Akbayır
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hilal Oğuz
- Department of Basic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Vildan Yasasever
- Department of Basic Oncology, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Sinan Berkman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nobbenhuis MA, Bancroft E, Moskovic E, Lennard F, Pharoah P, Jacobs I, Ward A, Barton DP, Ind TE, Shepherd JH, Bridges JE, Gore M, Haracopos C, Shanley S, Ardern-Jones A, Thomas S, Eeles R. Screening for ovarian cancer in women with varying levels of risk, using annual tests, results in high recall for repeat screening tests. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2011; 9:11. [PMID: 22112691 PMCID: PMC3231989 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-9-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed ovarian cancer screening outcomes in women with a positive family history of ovarian cancer divided into a low-, moderate- or high-risk group for development of ovarian cancer. Methods 545 women with a positive family history of ovarian cancer referred to the Ovarian Screening Service at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London from January 2000- December 2008 were included. They were stratified into three risk-groups according to family history (high-, moderate- and low-risk) of developing ovarian cancer and offered annual serum CA 125 and transvaginal ultrasound screening. The high-risk group was offered genetic testing. Results The median age at entry was 44 years. The number of women in the high, moderate and low-risk groups was 397, 112, and 36, respectively. During 2266 women years of follow-up two ovarian cancer cases were found: one advanced stage at her fourth annual screening, and one early stage at prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Prophylactic BSO was performed in 138 women (25.3%). Forty-three women had an abnormal CA125, resulting in 59 repeat tests. The re-call rate in the high, moderate and low-risk group was 14%, 3% and 6%. Equivocal transvaginal ultrasound results required 108 recalls in 71 women. The re-call rate in the high, moderate, and low-risk group was 25%, 6% and 17%. Conclusion No early stage ovarian cancer was picked up at annual screening and a significant number of re-calls for repeat screening tests was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Ae Nobbenhuis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden Foundation Trust, Cotswold Road and Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Challberg J, Ashcroft L, Lalloo F, Eckersley B, Clayton R, Hopwood P, Selby P, Howell A, Evans DG. Menopausal symptoms and bone health in women undertaking risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: significant bone health issues in those not taking HRT. Br J Cancer 2011; 105:22-7. [PMID: 21654687 PMCID: PMC3137416 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women at high ovarian cancer risk, especially those with mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, are encouraged to undergo bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSPO) prior to the natural menopause. The decision to use HRT to cover the period of oestrogen deprivation up to 50 years of age is difficult because of balancing the considerations of breast cancer risk, bone and cardiovascular health. METHODS We reviewed by questionnaire 289 women after BRRSPO aged ≤48 years because of high ovarian cancer risk; 212 (73%) of women responded. RESULTS Previous HRT users (n=67) had significantly worse endocrine symptom scores than 67 current users (P=0.006). A total of 123 (58%) of women had ≥24 months of oestrogen deprivation <50 years with 78 (37%) never taking HRT. Bone density (DXA) evaluations were available on 119 (56%) women: bone loss with a T score of ≤-1.0 was present in 5 out of 31 (16%) women with no period of oestrogen deprivation <50 years compared with 37 out of 78 (47%) of those with ≥24 months of oestrogen deprivation (P=0.03). INTERPRETATION Women undergoing BRRSPO <50 years should be counselled concerning the risks/benefits of HRT, taking into consideration the benefits on symptoms, bone health and cardiovascular health, and that the risks of breast cancer from oestrogen-only HRT appear to be relatively small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Challberg
- Department of Genetic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, 6th Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cancer antigen 125 level after a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: what is the contribution of the ovary to the cancer antigen 125 level? Menopause 2011; 18:133-7. [PMID: 20861755 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ecfb51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Serum cancer antigen (CA) 125 is the only biomarker used frequently in women with or at risk for ovarian cancer. However, the same reference level is used before and after (prophylactic) bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). We evaluated the effect of BSO on CA125 level in BRCA mutation carriers and tested which factors interact with the change in CA125 level. METHODS All women who participated in the Nijmegen gynecological screening program and underwent prophylactic BSO were included. Information was obtained on age, smoking, menopausal state, previous hysterectomy and breast cancer, histopathological examination of the adnexa, hormone therapy use, and CA125 level before and after surgical operation. Ovarian volume was calculated. The logarithmic-transformed CA125 levels were used in a linear mixed model to study the relative change in CA125 level and possible interaction. RESULTS In 60 women, a relative decrease of 18% in CA125 level after BSO was found (P < 0.01). The median serum CA125 level was 10.15 U/mL before and 8.36 U/mL after BSO. Menopausal state interacted with CA125 before and after the surgical operation (P < 0.01). In addition, ovarian volume did not explain the difference in CA125 level (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS BRCA mutation carriers show a relative decrease in CA125 level after BSO. Menopausal state interacts with CA125. Ovarian volume was excluded as a confounder. Possibly, the hormonal effect of ovaries plays a role in the CA125 level. Our study suggests that not the reference level of 35 U/mL but a lower level, as already suggested for postmenopausal women, should be applied to women after a salpingo-oophorectomy.
Collapse
|
37
|
[Screening pelvic tumours for hereditary risk of ovarian neoplasms, a cancer center experience]. Bull Cancer 2011; 98:113-9. [PMID: 21339094 DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
As part of a study in the North of France for screening pelvic tumours with plasma proteomic analysis, we included 82 women with hereditary risk of ovarian cancer. We report here the consequences of organized screening with usual tests. CA 125 sampling and a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound by a radiologist were systematically conducted every 6 months. Seventy-two patients were eventually evaluable. Two incident cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis (FIGO IIIB, malignant epithelial serous high-grade tumors) were discovered in two asymptomatic women with a deleterous BRCA1 mutation (2.7%). We did not observe any other primary cancer cases but an ovarian metastasis of a breast cancer. Forty women went off the study: 32 had a prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Consistent with the literature, biannual screening tests combining CA125 and pelvis ultrasound is ineffective for early detection of a pelvic tumor of tubal or ovarian origin. Testing for BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutations is then crucial for suspected family syndromes of breast and ovarian cancer. For women carrying a deleterous mutation on BRCA1/2 a salpingo-oophorectomy is the only way, only the time of this surgery is debatable.
Collapse
|
38
|
Michelsen T, Iversen OE. Masseundersøkelser mot gynekologisk kreft - status og fremtid. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2011; 131:1550-3. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.11.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
39
|
Koo DH, Chung IY, Kang E, Han SA, Kim SW. Usage Patterns of Surveillance, Chemoprevention and Risk-Reducing Surgery in KoreanBRCAMutation Carriers: 5 Years of Experience at a Single Institution. J Breast Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.s.s17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Do Hoon Koo
- Department of Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Il Yong Chung
- Breast Care Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunyoung Kang
- Breast Care Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Ah Han
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Breast Care Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
CA125 nadir concentration is an independent predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 119:265-9. [PMID: 20797777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2010] [Revised: 07/21/2010] [Accepted: 07/23/2010] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous reports described the prognostic value of the serum CA125 level after primary treatment (CA125 nadir) in a selection of ovarian cancer patients. Our primary objective was to determine whether the CA125 nadir level is of prognostic value on the progression-free survival (PFS) and on overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients in all stages of disease who reached complete remission (CR). METHODS Patients were selected from a population-based study on EOC patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2006 in 11 Dutch hospitals. All 331 patients who reached CR (i.e. no physical or radiological signs of residual disease and CA125 values ≤35 kU/L) after primary treatment were included. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of PFS and OS in CA125 nadir ≤5 kU/L and >5 kU/L were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to study the factors that independently influence survival. RESULTS A CA125 nadir ≤5 kU/L (n=69) was significantly associated with both a longer PFS and longer OS (log-rank test P<0.01 and P=0.03, respectively). The CA125 nadir was an independent prognostic variable (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.04-2.31) for PFS next to histological type, FIGO stage and residual tumor after surgery. CONCLUSIONS EOC patients who were in CR after standard primary treatment and attained CA125 nadir values of ≤5 kU/L had a significantly longer PFS and OS. Moreover, the CA125 nadir of ≤5 kU/L is an independent predictor of tumor recurrence.
Collapse
|
41
|
Schorge JO, Modesitt SC, Coleman RL, Cohn DE, Kauff ND, Duska LR, Herzog TJ. SGO White Paper on ovarian cancer: etiology, screening and surveillance. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 119:7-17. [PMID: 20692025 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 06/03/2010] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous, rapidly progressive, highly lethal disease of low prevalence. The etiology remains poorly understood. Numerous risk factors have been identified, the most prominent involving an inherited predisposition in 10% of cases. Women with germline mutations associated with Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch syndromes have dramatically elevated risks (up to 46% and 12%, respectively). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the best method to prevent ovarian cancer in these high-risk women. Significant risk reduction is also seen in the general population who use oral contraceptives. Since up to 89% patients with early-stage disease have symptoms prior to diagnosis, increased awareness of the medical community may facilitate further workup in patients who otherwise would have had a delay. Despite enormous effort, there is no proof that routine screening for ovarian cancer in either the high-risk or general populations with serum markers, sonograms, or pelvic examinations decreases mortality. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether any novel biomarkers, or panels of markers, have clinical utility in early detection. Prospective clinical trials have to be designed and completed prior to offering of any of these new diagnostic tests. CA125 is currently the only biomarker recommended for monitoring of therapy as well as detection of recurrence. This commentary provides an overview on the background, screening and surveillance of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
42
|
Herman JD, Appelbaum H. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and issues in pediatric and adolescent practice. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010; 23:253-8. [PMID: 20632459 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Herman
- Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Screening of high-risk groups for breast and ovarian cancer in Europe: a focus on the Jewish population. Oncol Rev 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s12156-010-0056-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
44
|
Skytte AB, Gerdes AM, Andersen MK, Sunde L, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Waldstrøm M, Kølvraa S, Crüger D. Risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers: uptake and timing. Clin Genet 2010; 77:342-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01329.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
45
|
van der Kolk DM, de Bock GH, Leegte BK, Schaapveld M, Mourits MJE, de Vries J, van der Hout AH, Oosterwijk JC. Penetrance of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: high cancer incidence at older age. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 124:643-51. [PMID: 20204502 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2010] [Accepted: 02/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Accurate estimations of lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer are crucial for counselling women from BRCA1/2 families. We therefore determined breast and ovarian cancer penetrance in BRCA1/2 mutation families in the northern Netherlands and compared them with the incidence of cancers in the general population in this region. We identified 1188 female mutation carriers and first-degree female relatives in 185 families with a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The occurrence of breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer was recorded. The cumulative incidence of breast cancer by age 70 was 71.4% (95% CI 67.2-82.4%) in BRCA1 and 87.5% (82.4-92.6%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers. For ovarian cancer at age 70, it was 58.9% (53.5-64.3%) in BRCA1 and 34.5% (25.0-44.0%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers. For breast cancer we saw a rise of 24.2% in the cumulative incidence in the seventh decade for BRCA2 mutation carriers versus 6.3% for BRCA1. For ovarian cancer the rise in the seventh decade was 17.3% for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 15.1% for BRCA2. The 10-year risk for contralateral breast cancer was 34.2% (29.4-39.0%) in BRCA1 families and 29.2% (22.9-35.5%) in BRCA2. We show that the incidence of breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers and of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers is still high after 60 years. This may justify intensive breast screening as well as oophorectomy even after age 60. The risk of contralateral breast cancer rises approximately 3% per year, which may affect preventive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorina M van der Kolk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mourits M, de Bock G. Managing hereditary ovarian cancer. Maturitas 2009; 64:172-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2009] [Revised: 09/01/2009] [Accepted: 09/01/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
Genetic testing for adult-onset diseases is now available. One such test is for the mutations present in the BRCA gene that result in a significantly higher risk for the development of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Women who have one of these mutations face difficult choices in terms of increased surveillance or prophylactic surgeries. Examining experiences of women with BRCA mutations can serve as an exemplar for other populations at risk for genetically associated adult-onset diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Hamilton
- Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Improvement of endometrial biopsy over transvaginal ultrasound alone for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2009; 8:391-7. [PMID: 19504173 PMCID: PMC2771130 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9252-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2008] [Accepted: 05/20/2009] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In women with hereditary non polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) an annual gynaecological surveillance has been recommended because of an increased lifetime risk of developing endometrial and ovarian carcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of gynaecological surveillance with regard to endometrial and ovarian carcinoma. Included were women from families that fulfilled the revised Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC or who showed a proven mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes. An annual gynaecological surveillance was performed (transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and CA 125 assessment). From January 2006 on, routine endometrial sampling was included. In a total number of 100 women 285 surveillance visits were performed. Among these, in 64 visits routine endometrial samplings were performed: three atypical hyperplasias and one endometrial carcinoma were diagnosed. This was significantly more than the atypical hyperplasia and two endometrial carcinomas that were detected after 28 samples performed because of abnormal surveillance results in 221 visits. There were no interval carcinomas. One invasive ovarian carcinoma stage IIIC was diagnosed at ovarian surveillance. Endometrial surveillance with routine endometrial sampling in women with HNPCC is more efficient in diagnosing endometrial (pre)malignancies than TVU only. Ovarian surveillance is not capable of diagnosing early stage ovarian carcinoma. Prophylactic hysterectomy in HNPCC should be restricted to women in whom abdominal surgery for other reasons is performed and to those with particularly increased risk such as MSH6 mutation carriers and/or women with multiple relatives with endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
|
49
|
Sasaroli D, Coukos G, Scholler N. Beyond CA125: the coming of age of ovarian cancer biomarkers. Are we there yet? Biomark Med 2009; 3:275-288. [PMID: 19684876 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.09.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States, despite its relatively low incidence of 50 per 100,000. Even though advances in therapy have been made, the OC fatality-to-case ratio remains exceedingly high, due to the lack of accurate tools to diagnose early-stage disease when cure is still possible. The most studied marker for OC, CA125, is only expressed by 50-60% of patients with early stage disease. Large efforts have been deployed to identify novel serum markers, yet no single marker has emerged as a serious competitor for CA125. Various groups are investing in combination approaches to increase the diagnostic value of existing markers, but many markers may still lie in under-explored areas of ovarian cancer biology, such as tumor vasculature environment and post-translational modifications (glycomics).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitra Sasaroli
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 421 Curie Boulevard, BRBII/III, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
|