A phase II study of capecitabine plus 3-weekly oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Fewer Feedback Opportunities and Health Perception of Gastric Cancer Survivors: Opportunities for Patient Education

This study aimed to estimate the impact of having fewer opportunities for patient education on health perception of gastric cancer survivors by examining quality-of-life (QoL) responses from patients who had been away for chemotherapy for a year. The full-surveillance (FullSV) group was comprised of gastric cancer survivors with stage I cancer who completed preoperative and postoperative 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month surveillances. The returning (RTN) group was comprised of 1-year survivors of stage II cancer who had been away for chemotherapy for a year. Surveillance periods were utilized to provide patient education about expected postoperative weight changes. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaires were used to assess QoL. The study included a total of 278 patients (243 in the FullSV group and 35 in the RTN group). The baseline QoL was not significantly different between the groups. Significant differences in postoperative QoL were revealed by some scales (global health status/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, financial difficulties, anxiety, dry mouth, and body image), all in favor of the FullSV group. Despite no significant difference in their actual weight changes, stronger weight dissatisfaction was revealed among the RTN group. Patients with fewer educational inputs for postoperative adjustment of weight perception were the ones with stronger dissatisfaction about current weight. The health perception of cancer survivors is under the constant influence of clinician feedback during patient education. For the best cancer survivorship care, sufficient opportunities for adjustment of health perception through patient education need to be ensured.

Antibiotic Treatment Improves the Efficacy of Oxaliplatin-Based Therapy as First-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

One of the first-line treatment for gastric cancer patients is oxaliplatin, and the efficacy of this chemotherapeutic can be attenuated by the microbiome. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated whether treatment with antibiotics improved the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-four patients were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group and 35 to the antibiotic-untreated group.

Results

The response rate of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the antibiotic-treated and antibiotic-untreated groups was 66.7% and 41.4%, respectively (p = 0.038). The median progression-free survival after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the antibiotic-treated and antibiotic-untreated groups was 8.8 and 5.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.456, 95% confidence interval = 0.254–0.819; p = 0.007, Log rank test). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that antibiotic treatment was the only clinical parameter that correlated with the response to oxaliplatin.

Conclusion

Antibiotic treatment could be used therapeutically to enhance the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Minimally invasive surgery is feasible after preoperative chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer

AIM

To elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as conversion surgery after chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer, we compared the background characteristics and clinical courses of patients who underwent open conversion surgery (open group) versus MIS (MIS group).

METHODS

We included 94 consecutive patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received chemotherapy followed by conversion surgery gastric resection from January 2011 to October 2019 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute in this analysis.

RESULTS

The open group included more patients who had macroscopic peritoneal metastasis and required splenectomy. However, other background characteristics, including preoperative chemotherapy duration, were comparable. The MIS group had significantly longer operative time (266 vs 339 minutes, P = .0039) and less operative blood loss (520 vs 10 mL, P < .0001). The incidence of postoperative complication of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher was non-significantly lower (24.5% vs 9.8%, P = .058) and length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MIS group (12 vs 8 days, P < .0001). Even though the open group included more patients with more advanced (ypT4a or higher, or N3) disease, the MIS group had better recurrence free survival and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that N status (hazard ratio [HR], 4.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18-12.26; P < .0001) and T status (2.11; 1.05-4.36; P = .036) were independent prognostic factors for OS. MIS was not a negative prognostic factor for OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.15-1.10; P = .081).

CONCLUSION

MIS can be safely performed as conversion surgery following chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer.

DNA Repair Gene XRCC1 and XPD Polymorphisms and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study Outcome from Kashmir, India

Coding polymorphisms in several DNA repair genes have been reported to affect the DNA repair capacity and are associated with genetic susceptibility to many human cancers, including gastric cancer. An understanding of these DNA repair gene polymorphisms might assess not only the risk of humans exposed to environmental carcinogens but also their responses to different therapeutical approaches, which target the DNA repair pathway. In the present study, polymorphic variants of two DNA repair genes, XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln, were chosen to be studied in association with gastric cancer susceptibility in the Kashmiri population. A total of 180 confirmed cases of gastric cancer (GC) and 200 hospital-based controls from Government Shri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital, Srinagar, were included in the study. The genotyping for XRCC1 and XPD genes was carried out by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. We found that tobacco smoking is strongly associated with GC risk (OR = 25.65; 95% CI: 5.49–119.7). However, we did not find any association of polymorphism of XRCC1 Arg399Gln (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 0.32–7.82) and XPD Lys751Gln (OR = 0.46; CI: 0.10–2.19) with GC risk in the study population. The combination of genotypes and gender stratification of XRCC1 and XPD genotypic frequency did not change the results. Consumption of large volumes of salt tea was also not associated with gastric cancer risk. Polymorphic variants of XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln are not associated with the risk of gastric cancer in the Kashmiri population. However, replicative studies with larger sample size are needed to substantiate the findings.

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Aims and background

The efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is now widely accepted. However, the survival advantage is small, and no internationally accepted standard regimen has emerged. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine (XELOX regimen) as first-line chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods and study design

Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 1) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study, median age was 61 years (range, 32–74); median follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 2–24.5). In total, 364 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. Overall response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 51.2–73.2), with 3 complete and 43 partial responses; median time to progression and overall survival were 5.9 (95% CI, 4.8–7.0) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.9–13.7), respectively. The most common hematological adverse event was anemia (67.6% of patients). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 5 patients. The most common nonhematological toxicities were neuropathy (64.9%), nausea/vomiting (48.6%), diarrhea (28.4%), and hand-foot syndrome (39.2%). Grade 3–4 toxicities were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions

The XELOX regimen was active and well-tolerated as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Downregulation of NPM expression by Her-2 reduces resistance of gastric cancer to oxaliplatin

Nucleophosmin (NPM) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2) are abnormally expressed in various types of human malignant tumors, including gastric cancer, and have been closely associated with cancer chemoresistance. However, their interaction and roles in oxaliplatin resistance are not fully understood. Therefore, the present study aimed to elucidate the relationship between NPM and Her-2 in gastric cancer cell lines and clinical samples, and further investigated their role in the resistance of gastric cancer to oxaliplatin. Western blotting and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed that NPM and Her-2 expression were significantly upregulated in gastric cancer cells and clinical samples, and that their expression levels were strongly correlated. However, Her-2 expression was not affected by upregulation or downregulation of NPM expression in gastric cancer cells. Cell counting kit-8 assays demonstrated that the cell sensitivity to oxaliplatin decreased simultaneously with an increase in NPM expression. Furthermore, inhibition of Her-2 expression using trastuzumab significantly increased the sensitivity of the cells to oxaliplatin, which occurred simultaneously with the downregulation of NPM. These results indicated that inhibition of NPM, as a Her-2 downstream signal, may be a novel strategy to overcome oxaliplatin-resistant gastric cancer, and that trastuzumab and oxaliplatin may exhibit a synergistic antitumor effect in Her-2-positive gastric cancer cells.

Evaluation of Outcome and Tolerability of Combination Chemotherapy with Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin as First Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background: Combination chemotherapy is accepted as a high efficacy treatment for gastric cancer, whereas choice of standard treatment is unclear. Multiple chemotherapeutic regimens have been used to achieve higher efficacy and lower toxicity. This study was designed to evaluate the treatment results of advanced gastric cancer with Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin regimen. Subjects and Methods: All cases with documented gastric adenocarcinoma and advanced disease were candidates for receiving Xelox regimen (Capecitabine - 750 mg/m²/twice daily/ 1-14 days and Oxaliplatin 125 mg/m² in 1st day). Results: Twenty five cases with advanced gastric cancer entered in study while 24 cases continued treatment protocol and were evaluated. Mean age was 59.5 ± 12.1 years (range: 20-75), male and female cases were 66.7% and 33.3%, respectively. All cases received at least four cycles of Xelox regimen. Overall response rate was 74.99% with 29.16% complete response. Overall survival rate was 13 ± 0.53 months and DFS (disease-free survival) was 6 ± 1.09 months. Extremities neuropathy (62.5%), headache (45.8%) and muscle cramps (29.2%) were the most common complains. Haematological changes were rare and 16.7% of cases had mild cytopenia. Treatment related death was not observed. Conclusion: Xelox regimen is a safe and highly effective first line treatment for gastric cancer; however, considering it as first line therapy needs larger studies.

Individualized Chemotherapy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Retrospective Data from a University Hospital in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Despite the decreased incidence, gastric cancer is still a frequent cause of cancer related death. The 1st line 2 or 3 drugs regimen is still a debatable issue. HER2 targeted therapy has emerged as the standard of care, but it is unavailable in the Brazilian Public Health System. The end-point of this trial was overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated in a public university hospital in Brazil. The secondary end-points were efficacy and safety of regimens with 2 (F+P) or 3 (EOX) drugs to develop an institutional guideline to facilitate optimal treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 1st line regimens were evaluated for OS and PFS stratified by age and ECOG using Cox regression.

RESULTS

47 patients were treated over the last 3 years. In 1st line, 29 were treated with F+P (mean 59.3 years, 34.5% ECOG 2 and a mean of 5.69 cycles) and 16 with EOX (mean 47 years, 18.8% ECOG 2 and a mean of 5.44 cycles). The median OS was 13.8 months (95%CI 10.7-16.9). Response was evaluated in 40 cases and was 64.3% for EOX and 37.5% for F+P (p=0.25). The median PFS was 9.5 months for EOX and 5.6 months for F+P (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.41-1.74). However, among patients with ECOG 2 mPFS was 3.70 vs 5.40 months, respectively (p=0.86). Regimens showed similar manageable adverse events. A total of 34 patients suffered progression and 14 received 2nd line therapy. Diffuse histology (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.22-2.88), achieving 2nd line (HR: 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.58) and treatment response (HR 0.23, 95%CI 0.12-0.47) were OS prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated in our hospital had outcomes compatible with the literature. The regimen choice should be related to patient features. Second line treatment should be considered.

Comparison between better and poorly differentiated locally advanced gastric cancer in preoperative chemotherapy: a retrospective, comparative study at a single tertiary care institute

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in China, and the long-term survival for locally advanced gastric cancer is very poor. Simple surgery cannot yield an ideal result because of the high recurrence rate after tumor resection. Preoperative chemotherapy could help to reduce tumor volume, improve the R0 resection rate (no residual tumor after surgery), and decrease the risk of local tumor recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of pathological differentiation in the effect of preoperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (n = 32) received preoperative chemotherapy under the XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) regimen. According to pathological examination, patients' tumors were classified into better (well and moderate) and poorly differentiated (lower differentiated and undifferentiated) groups, and the clinical response rate, type of gastrectomy, and negative tumor residual rate were compared between the two groups of patients. Morphological changes and toxic reactions were monitored after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The results showed that the clinical response rate in the better differentiated group was significantly higher than that in the poorly differentiated group (100% versus 25%, P = 0.000). The partial gastrectomy rate in the better differentiated group was significantly higher than that in the poorly differentiated group (87.5% versus 25% P = 0.000). A significant shrinking of tumor and necrosis of tumor tissues caused by chemotherapy could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the better differentiated group with locally advanced gastric cancer is suitable for preoperative chemotherapy under the XELOX regimen, and as a result of effective preoperative chemotherapy, much more gastric tissue can be preserved for the better differentiated group.

XRCC1 and XPD genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to obtain a comprehensive and reliable assessment of the relationships between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms and the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CISCOM, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases were searched for relevant articles published before September 1, 2013 without language restrictions. Crude odd ratios (ORs) or hazard risk (HR) [95 % confidence intervals (CI)] were calculated. Twelve clinical cohort studies were assessed with a total 1,024 GC patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Our meta-analysis findings revealed that GC patients with the GA+AA (A carrier) genotypes of XRCC1 Arg399Gln showed a lower effective clinical response (CR+PR) than those with the GG (A non-carrier) genotype (OR=0.41, 95 % CI 0.20∼0.82, P=0.012). However, there was no statistically significant difference in effective clinical response between those with XPD AC+CC (C carrier) genotypes and CC (C non-carrier) genotype (OR=0.55, 95 % CI 0.28∼1.07, P=0.076). Furthermore, the GA+AA genotypes of XRCC1 Arg399Gln was associated with a worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the CC genotype (PFS, HR=1.90, 95 % CI 1.12∼2.69, P<0.001; OS, HR=2.13, 95 % CI 0.79∼3.47, P=0.002, respectively). No relationships were found between XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and both PFS and OS (all P>0.05). No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. Results from the current meta-analysis indicate that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with poor clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

A multicenter phase II study of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

From March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32–85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1–29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10–42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9–34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1–6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3–10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions

Although the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation

The value of maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy has been verified in lung cancer and colorectal cancer, however, in gastric cancer, the role of maintenance therapy is still waiting for an answer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients in China. Specimens of patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who were given 6 cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xelox for short) as first-line chemotherapy, without disease progression and with grade 2 or higher neuropathy, were collected for analysis. Among them, 64 patients received capecitabine as maintenance (group A) and 222 patients without maintenance as group B. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. Grades 3-4 adverse events were uncommon; hematologic toxicity was infrequent (5%) and consistently mild in the phase of maintenance treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.2-12.6 months] for group A patients, while it was 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-8.0 months) for patients in group B, P < 0.001. The multivariated analysis showed that the maintenance treatment was an independent prognostic factor in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients. The style of first-line treatment-maintenance therapy (Xelox-X) was active and feasible for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had suffered from grade 2 or higher level of neuropathy.

S-1-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although both oral fluoropyrimidines were reported effective and safe, doubts exist about whether S-1 or capecitabine is more advantageous in advanced gastric carcinoma (AGC). Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of S-1-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for AGC.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, EmBase, Cochrane library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for articles comparing S-1-based chemotherapy to capecitabine-based chemotherapy for AGC. Primary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), progression-free probability, and survival probability. Secondary outcomes were toxicities. Fixed-effects model were used and all the results were confirmed by random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials and five cohort studies with 821 patients were included. We found equivalent ORR (38.3% vs. 39.1%, odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.24, P = 0.59), TTP (harzad ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.16, P = 0.79), OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.13, P = 0.91), progression-free probability (3-month OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.62-1.68, P = 0.94; 6-month OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88-2.04, P = 0.18) and survival probability (0.5-year OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61-1.31, P =0.57; 1-year OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70- 1.33, P = 0.84; 2-year OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.61-2.17, P = 0.66). Equivalent grade 3 to 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were found except hand-foot syndrome was less prominent in S-1-based chemotherapy (0.3% vs. 5.9%, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.56, P = 0.003). There're no significant heterogeneity and publication bias. Cumulative analysis found stable time-dependent trend. Consistent results stratified by study design, age, regimen, cycle, country were observed.

CONCLUSION

S-1-based chemotherapy was associated with non-inferior antitumor efficacy and better safety profile, compared with capecitabine-based therapy. We recommended S-1 and capecitabine can be used interchangeably for AGC, at least in Asia.

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: An analysis of 24 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX regimen) plus cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS: Forty-seven eligible patients were randomly assigned to a trial group and a control group. In the trial group, 24 patients were treated with celecoxib plus the XELOX regimen, while 23 patients in the control group omitted the oral intake of celecoxib. Treatment was repeated every 3 wk.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the overall response rate (RR) between the trial group and control group (50.0% vs 39.1%, P > 0.05). The disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in the trial group than in the control group (91.7% vs 65.2%, P < 0.05). The percentage of patients with improved quality of life (QOL) was significantly higher in the trial group than in the control group (83.3% vs 56. 5%, P < 0.05). The median time to progression (mTTP) was significantly longer in the trial group than in the control group (7.2 mo vs 5.7 mo, P < 0.05). The median survival time (MST) and one-year overall survival (OS) rate in the trial group were higher than these in the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (MST: 12.5 mo vs 11.3 mo; OS rate: 47.6% vs 41.2%; both P > 0.05). The incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was significantly lower in the trial group than in the control group (12.5% vs 39.1%, P < 0.05). Other toxicities were similar between the two groups. No chemotherapy-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION: COX-2 inhibitor combined with the XELOX regimen can improve the disease control rate and quality of life, reduce the incidence of hand-foot syndrome, and benefit median time to progression, but not overall survival time, in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Comparison of efficacy of different route of administration of chemotherapy on unresectable, advanced gastric cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies (FLEEOX and XELOX) with different routes of administration for unresectable gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 85 patients with unresectable gastric cancer hospitalized from January 2007 to December 2009 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FLEEOX group (48 patients) received the FLEEOX regimen(fluorouracil, leucovorin, http://epirubicin, epotoside, and oxaliplatin), which combined arterial with venous administration for one or two cycles, while the XELOX group (37 patients) received XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) via venous administration for two to four cycles. The clinical response and overall survival of the two groups were compared.

Results

In the FLEEOX group, the clinical response rate (RR) of chemotherapy was 85.4% (41 of 48 patients) and the median survival time was 25 months. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.4% and 45.8%, respectively. In the XELOX group, the clinical RR was 59.5% and the median survival time was 9 months, while the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 35.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The clinical RR, the R0 resection rate, the median survival time, and the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were significantly better (P < 0.05) in the FLEEOX group than in the XELOX group. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxic and adverse reactions or post-operative complications between the two groups.

Conclusions

For patients with a preoperative diagnosis of unresectable gastric cancer, the efficacy of the FLEEOX regimen, which combines arterial with venous administration, was better than that of the XELOX regimen, using venous administration only. This combination of arterial and venous administration could be useful for improving the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Efficacy and safety of XELOX and FOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy following radical total gastrectomy

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6) for advanced gastric cancer following total gastrectomy. We performed a retrospective study of 148 gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy from January, 2003 to June, 2009. The follow-up lasted until December, 2010. The Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed to compare the adverse events and prognosis. The total 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 95, 80 and 32%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.273). Similarly, the total incidence of side effects was similar, but each treatment was associated with unique disturbances. The number of patients developing hand-foot syndrome in the XELOX group was far higher compared to the FOLFOX6 group (P=0.000). By contrast, more patients in the FOLFOX6 group suffered from nausea (P=0.024), vomiting (P=0.029), alopecia (P=0.033) and peripheral phlebitis (P=0.004). The total completion rate of the XELOX group was higher compared to the FOLFOX6 group (P=0.015). No significant difference was found in the prognosis of patients receiving XELOX therapy or FOLFOX6 therapy following total gastrectomy. XELOX was, however, more tolerable for patients with total gastrectomy.

A multiple-center phase II study of weekly docetaxel and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin are active agents for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The combination of these two drugs in a triweekly schedule is an active and attractive regimen for gastric cancer but with significant hematological toxicities. A multicenter phase II study was designed to establish an active regimen with good tolerability by using a weekly docetaxel-oxaliplatin (DO) combination in GC patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed stage IV gastric cancer without previous palliative chemotherapy; age ≥18 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2; at least one measurable lesion; and adequate hematological, renal, and liver functions. All patients received premedications with dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonist before the chemotherapy. Docetaxel (Taxotere®; Sanofi-Aventis) 30 mg/m(2) followed by oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®; Sanofi-Aventis) 65 mg/m(2) were administered on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 3.0. Tumor responses were evaluated every 2 cycles by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Guidelines.

RESULTS

From May 2007 to December 2008, a total of 47 patients were enrolled. There were 8 females and 39 males with a median age of 57 years (range 26-76). Forty-three patients were evaluable for response. Two patients obtained a complete response (4.7%) and 12 patients had a partial response (27.9%), with an overall response rate of 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.1-48.5); 20 patients experienced stable disease (46.5%), and the disease progressed in 9 patients (20.9%). Median time to disease progression was 4.2 months and median overall survival was 8.3 months. All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5 patients, 10.6%), neutropenia (2 patients, 4.3%), and leukopenia (1 patient, 2.1%). The most common grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were fatigue (3 patients, 6.4%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation in 3 patients (6.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly DO demonstrated a well-tolerated profile with moderate activity in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Further studies of the combination together with a fluoropyrimidine are warranted.

Capecitabine for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer: efficacy, safety and ethnicity

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Capecitabine- and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens are widely used for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy of the two regimens for both Caucasian and Asian subjects, through a meta-analysis of the available trial evidence.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, ASO, ECCO, ESMO, Wanfang database (Chinese), CNKI (Chinese), Weipu database (Chinese) and J-STAGE (Japanese) using combinations of keywords, including 'capecitabine', '5-fluorouracil', 'chemotherapy', 'stomach neoplasms' and 'gastric cancer'. We identified relevant trial evidence and pooled the results on both efficacy and adverse events.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Capecitabine-based chemotherapy for AGC prolonged the overall survival (OS; 10·7 months vs. 9·5 months, P = 0·03) and enhanced the response rate (RR; OR = 1·32; 95% CI, 1·11-1·57; P = 0·002) over 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Similar trends were observed in both Caucasian and Asian patients. Capecitabine-based regimens were associated with reduced incidence rates of grade 3 or grade 4 leukopenia (OR = 0·42; P = 0·005), stomatitis (OR = 0·43; P = 0·004) and nausea and vomiting (OR = 0·60; P = 0·002) compared with 5-FU-based treatment. Incidence of haematological toxicity such as anaemia (OR = 0·88; P = 0·53), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0·58; P = 0·06), neutropenia (OR = 1·03; P = 0·78) and treatment-related mortality was similar between capecitabine- and 5-FU-based treatments. Higher frequency of grade 3 or grade 4 hand-foot syndrome (HFS; OR 2·45; P = 0·0007) was observed in capecitabine-based combination therapies. Asian patients with AGC receiving capecitabine-based combination therapies showed less frequent occurrence of grade 3 or grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity including nausea and vomiting (OR = 0·24; P = 0·0002) and stomatitis (OR = 0·33; P = 0·02) than those receiving 5-FU-based regimens. These differences in GI toxicity between treatment regimens were not significant in Caucasian subjects. No significant difference was found for the occurrence of anaemia (Caucasian subgroup: OR = 0·97, P = 0·88; Asian subgroup: OR = 0·63, P = 0·29), neutropenia (Caucasian subgroup: OR = 1·16, P = 0·27; Asian subgroup: OR = 0·75, P = 0·21) or thrombocytopenia (Caucasian subgroup: OR = 0·62, P = 0·18; Asian subgroup: OR = 0·51, P = 0·17) between the two ethnic subgroups.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Capecitabine-based chemotherapy strategies show prolonged OS and enhanced ORR compared with traditional 5-FU-based treatments and therefore should be considered as one of the first choices for treatment for AGC. Asian patients also showed less grade 3 or grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity with the capecitabine-based regimens.

A phase II study of irinotecan, continuous 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) combination chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen

OBJECTIVES

A phase II study was carried out to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) for the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurring gastric cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those who had metastatic gastric cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen or had disease recurrence within 6 months of completing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. Participants received irinotecan (150 mg/m² on day 1) and leucovorin (LV; 20 mg/m² on days 1-2) followed by continuous infusion of 5-FU (1500 mg/m² on days 1-2), every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Between April 2006 and March 2008, 33 patients were enrolled in the study. FOLFIRI served as a second-line treatment in 27 patients, third-line treatment in 4 patients, and fourth-line treatment in 2 patients. The patients had a median age of 60 years (range, 40-75) and underwent 132 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-15) per patient. The response rate was 18.2%, and the disease control rate was 36%. Median overall survival was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.74-6.45), and median time to progression was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.81-2.78). The major grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (45.4%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV is feasible in gastric cancer patients previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Although medical treatment has been shown to improve quality of life and prolong survival, no significant progress has been made in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) within the last two decades. Thus, the choice of optimum standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for AGC remains debatable, and most responses to chemotherapy are partial and of short duration, with a median survival of approximately 7-11 mo and survival at 2 years rarely more than 10%. Recently, remarkable progress in tumor biology has led to the development of new agents that target critical aspects of oncogenic pathways. For AGC, several molecular targeting agents are now under evaluation in international randomized studies, and trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, has shown antitumor activity against HER-2 positive AGC. However, this benefit is limited to only about 20% of patients with AGC (patients with HER-2 positive AGC). Therefore, there remains a critical need for both the development of more effective agents and the identification of predictive and prognostic molecular markers to select those patients who will benefit most from specific chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted therapies.

Role of capecitabine and irinotecan combination therapy in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. So far, the only curative treatment for gastric cancer is surgery. However, approximately half of all patients present with nonoperable tumors. Therefore, combination chemotherapy regimens are being accepted nowadays as first-line treatment for this disease. Despite the numerous efforts of randomized trials on advanced gastric cancer, no globally accepted regimen has yet been established. Historically, the most widely adopted protocols use 5-fluorouracil or platinum-based therapy with a response rate not exceeding 50% in combination therapy with a high rate of toxicity. Recently, many new drugs have emerged on the market and have been used in treating advanced or metastatic gastric cancer allowing the creation of new combination regimens with better clinical benefit. The combination of irinotecan plus capecitabine is one of these new combinations that seem to provide an acceptable response rate and good toxicity profile. In this article, we review the efficacy, tolerability, and feasibility of this combination for the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and we summarize the clinical trials using this regimen.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, UFT, and leucovorin in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, UFT, and leucovorin in metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by oral UFT capsules (350 mg/m(2) per day) and leucovorin tablets (90 mg/day), every 8 h, for 14 days, in a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (61% with > or = 2 metastatic sites), median age of 60 years (range, 39-69 years) were entered. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, one complete response and seven partial responses were found, resulting in an overall response rate (RR) of 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-54), a median time to progression of 4 months (95% CI, 0.5-7.5), and a median overall survival (OS) of 8 months (95% CI, 4.5-11.5). The 1-year survival rate was 26%. Three patients did not complete the first course of 2 weeks; 1 died suddenly on day 16 with fatal lung embolism; 1 had rapid progressive disease and 1 experienced gastric hemorrhage on day 15 - both these patients withdrew. In the 20 patients assessable for toxicity no grade 4 toxicity occurred, grade 3 toxicity consisted of anemia in 1, diarrhea in 2, and neurotoxicity in 3 patients. No hand-foot syndrome (HFS) occurred.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin is an effective drug in gastric cancer, but, as previously reported, its feasibility in combination with capecitabine is hampered due to combined hand-foot-based toxicity. The present phase II study of a combination of oxaliplatin with UFT and leucovorin appears to have efficacy and tolerability comparable to two other drug regimens used in gastric cancer, without the HFS problem.

Efficacy of lobaplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a report of 30 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobaplatin (LBP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (CF) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS: The clinical data for 30 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with LBP plus 5-FU and CF from March 2004 to September 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received at least two cycles of chemotherapy, each lasting 21 days and consisting of LBP 30 mg/m² IV d 1, 5-FU 300 mg/m² IV d 1-5, and CF 100 mg/m² IV d 1-5.

RESULTS: Thirty patients received 2 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of three cycles. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patients obtained a complete response. Partial response was achieved in 12 patients, stable disease in 5 patients, and progressive disease in 13 patients. The objective response rate was 40% (12/30). The tumor control rate was 56.7% (17/30). Therapy was generally well tolerated. Major toxicity was myelosuppression and gastrointestinal sensitivity, including anaemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting. No chemotherapy-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION: LBP plus 5-FU and CF regimen is effective and safe for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase I study of 3-weekly docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Adding docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) significantly improved clinical efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). To further improve the efficacy and tolerability, we substituted oxaliplatin for cisplatin and capecitabine for 5-FU in the DCF regimen and performed a phase I study to determine the recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (DXO) combination in patients with AGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with histologically proven metastatic AGC and ECOG performance status 0-2 were enrolled. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered i.v. on day 1. Capecitabine was administered orally bid on days 1-14. Each cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first two cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled: 15 patients in dose-escalation phase and 6 patients in the extension at the RD. Median age was 50 years (range 21-65 years). At dose level 3 (60 mg/m(2) docetaxel, 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine, 100 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin), 1 diarrhea (DLT) was found among 6 patients while at dose level 4 (60 mg/m(2) docetaxel, 800 mg/m(2) capecitabine, 130 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin), 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia and diarrhea) were observed among 3 patients. Therefore, the dose level 3 was determined as RD. DLTs include grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. Cumulative (all cycles) grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (75%), leucopenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (25%), diarrhea (17%), and neuropathy (17%). Of 14 patients with measurable lesions, 11 achieved partial response and 3 showed stable disease.

CONCLUSION

The RD of the DXO regimen in patients with AGC is capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, in combination with docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (day 1) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) (day 1) repeated every 3 weeks. The DXO regimen seems to have promising activity and offers an easy alternative to DCF. The toxicities appear to be still substantial, but manageable.

Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The REAL-2 and ML17032 trials demonstrated that the oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is noninferior to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

METHODS

Individual patient data were collected on all patients randomised within the trials (n = 1318). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and the log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between patients receiving 5-FU combinations and capecitabine combinations. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to calculate corrected hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS. Logistic regression was used for objective response rate. Forest plots with tests of heterogeneity were generated.

RESULTS

OS was superior in the 654 patients treated with capecitabine combinations compared with the 664 patients treated with 5-FU combinations; HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.98, P = 0.02). Poor performance status, age <60 and metastatic disease were independent predictors of poor survival. There was no significant difference in PFS between treatment groups on multivariate analysis. Assessable patients treated with capecitabine combinations were significantly more likely to have an objective response to treatment than those treated with 5-FU combinations; odds ratio 1.38 (95% CI 1.10-1.73, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

OS is superior in patients treated with capecitabine combinations compared with 5-FU combinations in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

Phase II study of epirubicin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel combination in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Background

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the activity and safety of a combination of epirubicin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Forty patients with measurable distant metastases received epirubicin 50 mg/m², docetaxel 60 mg/m² followed by oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end point was response rates (RR).

Results

All patients were evaluable. The overall RR was 47.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32–63). The disease control was 80%. Median time for response was 6 weeks. Median time to progression was 6.3 months (95% CI 5.4–7.2) and the median overall survival time was 12.1 months (95% CI 10.7–13.5). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 50% of patients with two episodes of febrile neutropenia (5%). Other non-hematological grade 3 toxicities included sensory neuropathy in two patiens (5%), vomiting and mucositis in two patients (5%) and diarrhea in one patient (2.5%).

Conclusion

The combination of epirubicin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel was found to be effective and well tolerated in patiens with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma and maybe an appropriate regimen to be used in the neoadjuvant setting and with molecularly targeted agents.

Significance of organic cation transporter 3 (SLC22A3) expression for the cytotoxic effect of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer

The effect of oxaliplatin against colorectal cancer is superior to that of cisplatin, but the molecular mechanism(s) involved is not clear. We found previously that oxaliplatin, but not cisplatin, was transported by human (h) and rat organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3)/SLC22A3. In the present study, we examined whether hOCT3 was significantly involved in the oxaliplatin-induced cytotoxicity and accumulation of platinum in colorectal cancer. The level of hOCT3 mRNA in the colon was 9.7-fold higher in cancerous than in normal tissues in six Japanese patients (P = 0.0247). In human colorectal cancer-derived cell lines, the mRNA of hOCT3 was highly expressed compared with that of other organic cation transporters. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and accumulation of platinum with oxaliplatin treatment were increased in SW480 cells transfected with hOCT3 cDNA compared with empty vector-transfected cells. T84 and SW837 cells, with high levels of hOCT3, released more LDH and accumulated more platinum after oxaliplatin treatment than low hOCT3-expressing cells such as SW480, HCT116, HT29, and Lovo. However, the amount of platinum accumulated after cisplatin treatment did not differ among these six cell lines. The levels of hOCT3 expression in colon and rectum were also higher in cancerous than in normal tissues in Caucasian patients as determined by dot blotting. In conclusion, the hOCT3-mediated uptake of oxaliplatin into the cancers was suggested to be important for its cytotoxicity, and hOCT3 expression may be a marker for cancer chemotherapy including oxaliplatin.

A multiple-center phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin and tegafur-uracil/leucovorin for chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The current study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating chemonaive patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients were 18-75 years old, had stage IV disease or post-surgery recurrence, no prior palliative chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients in the current study received 2-h i.v. infusion of oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) after diluting in 500 mL 5% dextrose/water (dexan premedication), and 5-HT3 antagonist biweekly. Oral tegafur-uracil and leucovorin was given at a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day and 60 mg/day three times daily from day 1 to 21, respectively, followed by a 1-week rest. Response assessment was based on the RECIST criteria and was performed every two courses. Toxicity was assessed according to NCI common toxicity criteria version 2.

RESULTS

From October 2003 to April 2006, 57 patients were evaluated (55 eligible) with a median age of 61 years (range 31-75). According to the assessment of response in 48 evaluable patients, partial response rate was 24/48 (50.0%) (95% CI: 35.23-64.73%) and stable disease was observed in 11 patients (22.92%), and diseased progressed in 13 patients (27.08%). Mean number of oxaliplatin cycles was 3 (0.5-6.5). Median time to progression was 177 days. Median overall survival was 318 days. Major-grade (III/IV) toxicities were diarrhea 25.5%, vomiting 16.5%, anemia 10.9%, numbness 12.7%, thrombocytopenia 7.3%, neutropenia 3.6% and leucopenia 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly, oxaliplatin combining oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer showed acceptable activity and manageable toxicity.

A phase i study of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel (FLTAX) as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of combination chemotherapy with leucovorin-modulated weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven metastatic or recurrent GC were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by 5-FU as a bolus i.v. infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. A 2-h i.v. infusion of l-leucovorin was started at the same time as the paclitaxel infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patients were scheduled to receive 5-FU, l-leucovorin and paclitaxel at four dose levels (mg/m(2)/week): 500/250/60 (level 1), 500/250/80 (level 2), 600/250/80 (level 3) and 600/250/100 (level 4), respectively.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled. During the first cycle of the highest dose level (level 4), two of the six patients had DLT involving Grade 3 diarrhea and Grade 3 skin rash. Furthermore, three of the four patients who received the second consecutive cycle of treatment at dose level 4 had Grade 4 neutropenia. Dose level 3 was thus determined to be the MTD. Eleven (61%) of the 18 patients had partial responses, and the median progression-free survival time was 6.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD and the recommended dose for phase II studies of this regimen were determined to be 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/week, l-leucovorin 250 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2)/week.

Current approaches to gastric cancer in Korea

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health problem and is the most common cancer in Korea. Surgery is the only curative treatment for localized gastric cancer, but most cases present at an advanced stage. The proportion of early gastric cancer and the incidence of gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach have increased in Korea. The majority of patients in Korea receive surgery alone or surgery plus chemotherapy. Over 50% of the surgeries have been performed in five major hospitals, with most surgeons performing extended lymph node dissection (D2 or D3). The 5-year survival rate with curative resection is 55.6%-66.0%, with rates of 92.9%-98.0%, 84.2%-92.0%, 69.3%-72.0%, 45.8%-54.0%, 29.6%-36.5%, and 9.2%-23.9% according to TNM stages of Ia, Ib, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV, respectively. Although convincing phase III data are lacking, postoperative immunochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin for 2 months followed by OK-432 plus doxifluridine for 24 months has been widely used in Korea. A phase III trial of adjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin is ongoing in curatively resected disease (CLASSIC study). The modified 5-FU/cisplatin regimen has become popular since the mid 90s, and various combinations including taxanes, oral 5-FU prodrugs, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan have been evaluated. Recently, Korean investigators have played pivotal roles in studies initiated by global pharmaceutical companies, and the Korean Cancer Study Group has initiated 14 multicenter trials, including phase III trials in gastric cancer and international cooperative trials. Future international cooperative trials are anticipated.

Capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Although the role of systemic chemotherapy has been established for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Based on the results of several randomized Phase III trials, 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion plus cisplatin, with or without epirubicin, has become the global reference regimen for this patient population. However, treatment with fluorouracil infusion requires either frequent hospitalizations or the use of a central venous access device, harboring potential complications. Capecitabine, a tumor-activating oral prodrug of fluorouracil, may be more advantageous in terms of patient convenience, safety and efficacy. Two recent randomized Phase III trials have shown that capecitabine could replace infusional fluorouracil in cisplatin-based regimens. Furthermore, Phase II trials have shown that many other capecitabine-based doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens incorporating newer cytotoxic agents are active and well tolerated. Many promising biological agents are now being tested in Phase III trials, incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms, in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Capecitabine in combination with leucovorin and oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine in combination with leucovorin and oxaliplatin regimen (CAPE-LV-OXA) as the adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients were administrated with oral capecitabine 1250 mg/(m²·d) (d1-14) and oral leucovorin 90 mg/d (d1-14), and intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² (d1) in a 21-day cycle regimen for 2-6 cycles.

RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. There was no complete response, while 13 patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 52%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.4 months (range 2-13 months). The median survival time was 10.3 months (range 3-25 months). Therapy was generally well tolerated, and the most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal response, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome. There was no chemotherapy-related death.

CONCLUSION: CAPE-LV-OXA regimen is an effective and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen for advanced gastric cancer.

Multicenter phase II study of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Daegu Gyeongbuk Oncology Group

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received intravenous docetaxel 65 mg m⁻² plus oxaliplatin 120 mg m⁻² on day 1 based on a 3-week cycle. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the current study, among whom 39 were assessable for efficacy and all assessable for toxicity. One complete response and 18 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 45.2% (95% confidence interval (CI); 31.7–59.7%). At a median follow-up of 7.7 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival was 5.7 (95% CI; 4.3–7.2) months and 9.9 (95% CI; 7.8–12.0) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 11 patients (26.1%) and febrile neutropenia was observed in four patients (9.5%). The common non-haematologic toxicity was fatigue (grade 1/2, 61.9%) and nausea (grade 1/2, 47.7%). The combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and capecitabine as a first-line combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Paclitaxel and capecitabine, which have distinct mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, have each shown high activity as single agents in gastric cancer. Synergistic interaction between these two drugs was suggested by taxane-induced upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase. We, therefore, evaluated the antitumour activity and toxicities of paclitaxel and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic AGC were treated with capecitabine 825 mg m⁻² p.o. twice daily on days 1–14 and paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Between June 2002 and May 2004, 45 patients, of median age 57 years (range=38–73 years), were treated with the combination of capecitabine and paclitaxel. After a median 6 cycles (range=1–9 cycles) of chemotherapy, 43 were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 2 patients showed complete response and 20 showed partial response making the overall response rate 48.9% (95% CI=30.3–63.5%). After a median follow-up of 42.2 months (range=31.2–54.3 months), median time to progression was 5.6 months (95% CI=3.9–7.2 months) and median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI=8.1–14.4 months). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events include neutropaenia (46.5% of patients), hand–foot syndrome (9.3%), arthralgia (9.3%), and asthenia (4.7%). There was no neutropaenic fever or treatment-related deaths. Paclitaxel and capecitabine combination chemotherapy was active and highly tolerable as a first-line therapy for AGC.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary system adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicentre phase II trial

This prospective multicentre phase II study characterises the toxicity and activity of first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination therapy (CAPOX) in advanced biliary system adenocarcinomas. Patients received oxaliplatin (130 mg m⁻², day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg m⁻² b.i.d., days 1–14) every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified prospectively into two groups based on location of the primary (gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) versus intrahepatic mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)). Sixty-five patients were evaluable. The response rate in 47 patients with GBC/ECC was 27% (4% complete responses), and in 23 patients (49%) stable disease (SD) was encountered. In 18 patients with ICC, we observed no objective responses, but 6 patients (33%) had SD. Median survival was 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.0–15.6) for patients with GBC or ECC (GBC: 8.2 months; 95% CI, 4.3–11.7; ECC: 16.8 months; 95% CI, 12.7–20.5), and 5.2 months (95% CI, 0.6–9.8) for ICC patients. In both cohorts, therapy was well tolerated. The most common grade 3–4 toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy (11 patients). Our data suggest that the CAPOX regimen is a well-tolerated and active treatment option for advanced ECC and GBC but might produce poorer results for ICC.

Multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: FFCD 03-03 trial

Evaluation of new drug combinations is needed to improve patients' prognosis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the capecitabine–oxaliplatine combination (XELOX) in HCC patients. First-line chemotherapy with XELOX regimen consisting of a 3-week cycle of intravenous oxaliplatin (130 mg m⁻²) on Day 1, and oral capecitabine twice daily from Days 1–14 (1000 mg m⁻²) was administered in patients with measurable, unresectable HCC. Fifty patients (male, 88%; median age, 68 years) received a total of 295 cycles (median, 6) of treatment. Disease control (three partial responses, 29 stable diseases) rate was 72% (95% CI 57–83%). Median overall and median progression-free (PFS) survival was 9.3 months and 4.1 months, respectively. Progression-free survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 38% (95% CI 26–52%) and 14% (95% CI 7–26%), respectively. Main grade 3–4 drug-related toxicities included diarrhoea (16%), elevation of aminotransferases and/or bilirubin (16%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and neurotoxicity (6%). Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin regimen showed modest anti-tumour activity with tolerable toxicities in patients with advanced HCC. However, the manageable toxicity profile and the encouraging disease control rate deserve further attention for this convenient, outpatient-based chemotherapy regimen.

Capecitabine: in advanced gastric or oesophagogastric cancer

The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is metabolised preferentially in tumour tissue to the cytotoxic moiety fluorouracil. In a well designed phase III trial in patients with advanced gastric cancer, capecitabine plus cisplatin was noninferior to fluorouracil plus cisplatin in terms of progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [95% CI 0.63, 1.04]). In another similarly designed phase III trial in patients with oesophagogastric cancer (REAL 2), pooled capecitabine-based regimens were noninferior to pooled fluorouracil-based regimens in terms of overall survival (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.80, 0.99]). These data are supported by randomised and noncomparative phase II trials in treatment-naive or pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer or oesophagogastric cancer receiving capecitabine either as monotherapy or in combination with other antitumour agents. Given the nature of chemotherapy, capecitabine-based regimens were generally well tolerated, with the nature of treatment-related adverse events occurring with capecitabine-based regimens being similar to those of fluorouracil-based regimens.

Capecitabine in combination with Oxaliplatin (XELOX) as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated efficacy and safety of XELOX in previously untreated patients with AGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) over 2 h on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks (XELOX). Treatment was continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicities or eight cycles reached. All tumour evaluations were reviewed and confirmed centrally. Design was according to Ensign's three-stage method.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (37 men) were enrolled; median age 57 years (range 29-70). In total, 311 cycles of XELOX were delivered. Overall response rate was 63% (95% CI, 50-76%), with 3 complete and 31 partial responses. At 13 months' median follow-up, median progression-free and overall survival were 5.8 (95% CI, 4.4-7.2) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.8-15.1), respectively. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (70% of patients). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in four patients, with neutropenic fever in only one patient. Most common non-haematological toxicities were neuropathy (70%), vomiting (50%), diarrhoea (33%), and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (39%). Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare. Treatment was delayed or the dose reduced in 30 and 15% of cycles, respectively. There was one treatment-related death associated with grade 4 neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSION

XELOX was active and well tolerated as a first-line therapy for AGC.

Recent advances in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of gastrointestinal cancers by nucleoside antimetabolites

Peritoneal dissemination is the most common cause of metastasis from malignancies in the abdominal cavity. There are no standard treatments for peritoneal dissemination and the results are poor. The reasons for this are as follows: (1) no effective chemotherapeutic agents have been identified or developed; (2) surgical cytoreduction has little effect on survival improvement; and (3) the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have not been clarified and no therapy against the target molecules has been developed. However, studies on the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have elucidated some of the target molecules and the development of new multimodal therapies has also improved survival. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy have been newly developed, and a novel surgical therapy named peritonectomy has been proposed to perform complete cytoreduction of peritoneal dissemination. At present, these approaches appear to be effective therapeutic modalities for peritoneal dissemination. However, TS-1 and capecitabine have shown worthwhile results in recent clinical trials for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We recently found that newly developed antitumor cytosine nucleoside analogs show a survival advantage in peritoneal dissemination models using human cancer cells. These non-fluoropyrimidine nucleosides may potentially help to improve the poor prognosis observed in patients with advanced cancers involving peritoneal dissemination.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: across the years for a standard of care

Chemotherapy is of crucial importance in advanced gastric cancer patients, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improve survival. The most extensively studied drugs as single agents are 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitomycin C and etoposide. Newer chemotherapeutic agents include the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and S-1), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Randomised trials comparing monotherapy with combination regimens have consistently shown increased response rates in favour of combination regimens, whereas only marginally improved survival rates were usually found. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in Phase III trials. However, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. There is no internationally accepted standard of care, and uncertainty remains regarding the choice of the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The objective of this article is to review the present literature available on major Phase II - III clinical trials, in which patients suffering from advanced gastric cancer were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and epirubicin as first-line treatment in advanced gastric carcinoma: a phase II study

The association between oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been extensively reported to improve prognosis of gastric cancer patients. The present study is aimed at evaluating response rate and the toxicity profile of the association with oxaliplatin, 5-FU/lecovorin and epirubicin in gastric cancer patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Thirty-six patients have been enrolled and 35 evaluated. The treatment schedule was oxaliplatin (100 mg m(-2)), 5-FU (400 mg m(-2)), leucovorin (40 mg m(-2)) and epirubicin (60 mg m(-2)) intravenously. administered every 3 weeks for 6 months, for a total of 185 therapy cycles . Response rate and toxicity were assessed according to the international WHO criteria. Every patient received a mean of 5.3 therapy cycles in a day-hospital setting. Sixteen of 35 patients (46%) showed an objective response, two complete response and 14 partial response. Median time to progression was 33 weeks with an overall median survival of 49 weeks. During the study, anaemia grade 3 and neutropenia grade 3 were observed in 9 and 11% of patients respectively. A grade 3 periferic sensorial neuropathy was observed in 6% of patients. No life threatening or cardiac toxicity was recorded. The regimen used showed anticancer activity against gastric carcinoma, a tolerable toxicity profile and excellent patient compliance.