Phase I/II study of docetaxel and S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Phase II study of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0902)

BACKGROUND

Although there is insufficient evidence for the treatment of older patients with advanced gastric cancer, fluorouracil combined with platinum chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line treatment for such populations in Japan despite the lack of efficacy and toxicity data.

METHODS

Patients aged 75 years or older with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. S-1 plus docetaxel (docetaxel: 40 mg/m2, day 1; S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1-14; q21 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. The sample size was calculated as 30 under the hypothesis of an expected response rate of 40% and a threshold response rate of 20%, at a power of 90% and a two-sided alpha value of 5%.

RESULTS

From February 2010 to January 2015, 31 patients were enrolled and assessed for efficacy and toxicity. The response rate was 45.2% (95% CI 27.3%-64.0%; p = 0.001) and it exceeded the expected response rate set at 40%. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months, the 1-year survival rate was 58.1%, and the median survival time was 16.1 months. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), anorexia (10%), and fatigue (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients is feasible and that it has promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial

Prospective evidence regarding the combination of programmed cell death (PD)-1 and angiogenesis inhibitors in treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is limited. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT04195828), patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (clinical T2-4N + M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (CA-SAP) or chemotherapy SAP alone (SAP) for 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR), defined as <10% residual tumor cells in resection specimens. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, radiologic response, safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The modified intention-to-treat population was analyzed (CA-SAP [n = 51] versus SAP [n = 53]). The trial has met pre-specified endpoints. CA-SAP was associated with a significantly higher MPR rate (33.3%) than SAP (17.0%, P = 0.044). The CA-SAP group had a significantly higher objective response rate (66.0% versus 43.4%, P = 0.017) and R0 resection rate (94.1% versus 81.1%, P = 0.042) than the SAP group. Nonsurgical grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 17 patients (33.3%) in the CA-SAP group and 14 (26.4%) in the SAP group. Survival results were not reported due to immature data. Camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen was tolerable and associated with favorable responses for LAGC.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Increase Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, and Doxorubicin Efficacy against Human Cervix Cancer Cells

This study shows that the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) celecoxib and its non-cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) analogue dimethylcelecoxib (DMC) exert a potent inhibitory effect on the growth of human cervix HeLa multi-cellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) when added either at the beginning (“preventive protocol”; IC₅₀ = 1 ± 0.3 nM for celecoxib and 10 ± 2 nM for DMC) or after spheroid formation (“curative protocol”; IC₅₀ = 7.5 ± 2 µM for celecoxib and 32 ± 10 µM for DMC). These NSAID IC₅₀ values were significantly lower than those attained in bidimensional HeLa cells (IC₅₀ = 55 ± 9 µM celecoxib and 48 ± 2 µM DMC) and bidimensional non-cancer cell cultures (3T3 fibroblasts and MCF-10A mammary gland cells with IC₅₀ from 69 to >100 µM, after 24 h). The copper-based drug casiopeina II-gly showed similar potency against HeLa MCTS. Synergism analysis showed that celecoxib, DMC, and casiopeinaII-gly at sub-IC₅₀ doses increased the potency of cisplatin, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin to hinder HeLa cell proliferation through a significant abolishment of oxidative phosphorylation in bidimensional cultures, with no apparent effect on non-cancer cells (therapeutic index >3.6). Similar results were attained with bidimensional human cervix cancer SiHa and human glioblastoma U373 cell cultures. In HeLa MCTS, celecoxib, DMC and casiopeina II-gly increased cisplatin toxicity by 41–85%. These observations indicated that celecoxib and DMC used as adjuvant therapy in combination with canonical anti-cancer drugs may provide more effective alternatives for cancer treatment.

Phase I/II Study of Docetaxel and S-1 in Previously-Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: LOGIK0408

Background: As docetaxel plus S-1 may be feasible for cancer treatment, we conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the recommended docetaxel dose and the fixed S-1 dose (phase I), as well as confirm the regimen’s efficacy and safety (phase II) for previously-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients ≤75 years with performance status ≤1 and adequate organ function were treated at three-week intervals with docetaxel on day 1 and 80 mg/m² oral S-1 from days 1–14. The starting docetaxel dose was 45 mg/m² and this was escalated to a maximum of 70 mg/m². In phase II, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were assessed. Results: The recommended doses were 50 mg/m² docetaxel (day 1) and 80 mg/m² S-1 (days 1–14). Grades 3 and 4 leukocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 44% and 67% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Overall response to chemotherapy was 7.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6–20.9%), and median PFS and OS were 18.0 weeks (95% CI; 11.3–22.9 weeks) and 53.0 weeks, respectively. Conclusion: Fifty mg/m² docetaxel plus 80 mg/m² oral S-1 had a lower response rate than anticipated; however, the survival data were encouraging. A further investigation is warranted to select the optimal patient population.

Retrospective analysis of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in Colombia

Aims: To assess patient and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and associated costs in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (A/MGC) in Colombia, in both the public and private hospitals. Materials and methods: A total of 145 patients who had received first-line chemotherapy treatment (platinum analog and/or a fluoropyrimidine) and were followed for at least 3 months after the last administration of a first-line cytotoxic agent were eligible for inclusion. Case-report forms were elaborated based on the patients' medical records from three Colombian hospitals. Estimates of treatment costs were calculated using unit costs from the participating hospitals. Results: Of the 145 patients, more than half (64.83%) were male, 79.56% were diagnosed with metastatic stage IV disease (mean age = 58.14 years). Prior to MGC diagnosis, 31.71% of the patients being operated on received a total gastrectomy; 66.9% of the patients received a doublet therapy, of which 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with cisplatin was the standard treatment (14%), followed by combination with leucovorin (12%). Only around 10% of the patients responded to first-line treatment. Out of 41.38% of the patients who received a second-line treatment, 71.67% were still administered a platinum analog and/or fluoropyrimidine. During the follow-up period, 52% of the patients progressed and 20% achieved stable disease. Best supportive care mostly consisted of outpatient visits after last line-therapy (72.41%), palliative radiotherapy (18.6%), and surgery (37.2%). Limitations and conclusions: Gastric cancer is one of the main causes of cancer-related death in Colombia, as most of the patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when prognosis is poor. Treatment patterns are highly heterogeneous. Second-line treatments were mostly initiated with paclitaxel, capecitabine, irinotecan, or cisplatin.

A case of advanced gastric cancer achieved a pathological complete response by chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although chemotherapy is the first recommended treatment of unresectable gastric cancer, a pathological complete response is a rare event.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 58-year-old male was diagnosed as gastric cancer with a bulky tumor, lymphadenopathy, and suspicious peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin. After three courses of chemotherapy, a computed tomography showed dramatic improvements in gastric wall thickening, shrinkage of lymphadenopathy, and disappearance of disseminated peritoneal lesion. The patient underwent potentially curative resection by total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Histological examination revealed the absence of malignant cells not only in the resected specimen but also in the harvested lymph nodes. At present, more than 7 years after the initial surgery, the patient is still alive without any recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We obtained a pathological complete response by chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Although a pathological complete response is a rare event, it would be associated with the long-term survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase I/II Study of S-1 Plus Cisplatin Alternating With S-1 Plus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the usefulness of S-1 plus cisplatin alternating with S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer, we conducted a phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose, and evaluate efficacy and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. Cisplatin was administered on day 1 and the dose escalated by 10 mg/m from a starting dose of 40 mg/m in the phase I part. S-1 was given orally at 80 mg/m on days 1 to 14 and docetaxel at 40 mg/m on day 22 in combination with S-1 80 mg/m on days 22 to 35. The treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint of the phase II analysis was the response rate.

RESULTS

Nine patients entered the phase I and 24 the phase II part. Because 50% of patients (3/6) developed dose-limiting toxicities in the phase I part, the maximum tolerated dose of cisplatin was presumed to be 50 mg/m. Therefore, the estimated recommended dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m; 27 patients received that dose. The response rate was 59.3% (95% confidence interval, 40.8-77.8) and the median follow-up 26.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and the median overall survival 18.6 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (59.3%), leucopenia (37.0%), and anemia (29.6%). These toxicities were tolerable and manageable.

CONCLUSION

This alternating treatment seems to have promising activity with tolerable toxicities in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Second-Line Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Gastric Cancer Patients after Failed Docetaxel and S-1

Background. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicities of second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients previously treated with docetaxel and S-1 with or without oxaliplatin (DS/DOS). Patients and Methods. We reviewed the data of patients who had previously been treated with first-line DS/DOS and received biweekly irinotecan-based chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/IFL) between October 2004 and November 2011. Results. A total of 209 cycles were administered to 35 patients, with a median of 4 (range, 1–22) cycles each. The overall response rate in 29 response-assessable patients was 17.2%, including 2 complete and 3 partial responses. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–5.80) months and 6.24 (95% CI, 1.44–11.04) months, respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (8.6%). Conclusion. FOLFIRI/IFL chemotherapy showed modest antitumour activity and tolerable toxicities in DS/DOS-treated MGC patients.

Low-dosed docetaxel showed equivalent efficacy but improved tolerability compared with oxaliplatin in the S-1-based first-line chemotherapy regimen for metastatic or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma

Platinum-fluoropyrimidine combinations are the preferred first-line options for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in East Asia. On the other hand, docetaxel-containing regimens without platinum have demonstrated promising activity in AGC. However, dose-related toxicity of docetaxel has limited its clinical adoption. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a modified low-dosed docetaxel plus S-1 (mDS) with oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in Chinese patients with AGC. Patients were assigned to receive either oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) in the SOX arm or docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) in the mDS arm on day 1 of every 3-week cycle. S-1 80-120 mg/day was administered orally on days 1-14 in the 3-week cycle in both groups. One hundred and eighty-eight patients (mDS regimen 101; SOX 87) showed similar overall survival (OS; 13.1 vs 12.8 months, P = 0.878), progression-free survival (PFS; 5.8 vs 5.5 months, P = 0.924), and overall response rate (39.7 vs 44.2%, P = 0.569) in the mDS and SOX arms, respectively. mDS was associated with significantly less grade 3/4 toxicities in thrombocytopenia (5.9 vs 16.1%) and gastrointestinal disturbances (1.0 vs 8.0%). Furthermore, in patients who had ever received oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 40), mDS resulted in significantly superior OS (17.8 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.015) and PFS (7.0 vs 4.2 months, P = 0.008) compared with SOX. In conclusion, mDS was as effective as SOX in Chinese patients with AGC, but it resulted in a significantly improved tolerability. In patients who received oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy before, mDS was associated with improved efficacy in the first-line setting.

Dose-dense biweekly docetaxel combined with 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II trial

This study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QoL) of a dose-dense biweekly regimen of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Eligible patients received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by 2,400 mg/m(2) 46-h infusion), fortnightly. Prophylactic use of G-CSF was adopted in all patients. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and QoL. Thirty-nine patients with a median age of 55 (28-80) were included. The RR was 51.3 %. Median PFS and OS were 6.7 and 14.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events (all grades) were anemia (34, 87.2 %), fatigue (29, 74.4 %), neutropenia (26, 66.7 %), nail change (19, 48.7 %) and liver dysfunction (15, 38.5 %). In QoL analysis, improvements were obtained in seven scales, whereas drops were seen in three scales. Common Grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (28.2 %), liver dysfunction (7.7 %) and fatigue (7.7 %). This novel regimen is a promising option for AGC, showing high RR, improvement on QoL and acceptable toxicity.

Chemotherapy treatment of a pregnant woman with progressive gastric cancer

We herein describe a rare case of gastric cancer that was treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. A woman in her thirty's at 23 weeks of gestation was admitted to the hospital with epigastralgia and left cervical lymph node swelling. She had been previously diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma at another hospital. Findings from a CT scan and esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed progressive gastric cancer, and the pathology indicated poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Chemotherapy was administered at 24 weeks of gestation, without the development of severe toxicity. At 32 weeks of gestation, a healthy baby girl (birth weight 1,442 g, Apgar score 7/8) was delivered by caesarean section. The child continued to show no abnormalities at 12 months after delivery.

Efficacy of docetaxel plus S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus S-1 (DS regimen) for resectable advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS: Two hundred and twenty patients with operable locally advanced gastric cancer were collected and equally divided into two groups (A and B). In group A, patients received docetaxel (35 mg/m²) on day 1 for 2 h and daily oral administration of S-1 [80 mg/(m²•d)] on days 1-14 every 4 wk for two cycles, and prophylactic administration of antiemetic medication at a standard doses was routinely used to prevent nausea and vomiting. Then gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was performed. In group B, patients received only gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR), postoperative complications, local recurrence rate and survival rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Treatment-related death or operative mortality was not found in this study. Because of economic reasons, only 107 (97.3%) patients underwent surgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (1.8% vs 2.7%, P > 0.05) or poor healing of incision (5.6% vs 4.5%, P > 0.05). There were significant differences in R0 radical resection rate (99.06% vs 92.73%, P < 0.05), pCR rate (8.41% vs 1.81%, P < 0.05) and local recurrence rate (18.6% vs 31.8%, P < 0.05) between the two groups. The 3- (55.7% vs 40.6%, P < 0.05) and 5-year survival rates (31.3% vs 21.8%, P < 0.05) also differed significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: DS regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable locally advanced gastric cancer can increase the rates of R0 radical resection, pCR and survival, and decrease the recurrence rate, without increasing the rate of complications.

Phase II study of docetaxel and S-1 (DS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel (DTX) plus S-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients from 14 centers were centrally registered. Patients received DTX (35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15, and daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day) for days 1-14 every 4 weeks for two courses, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was pathological response rate (pRR). This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trial registry (UMIN000000875).

RESULTS

The primary endpoint pRR was 47 % (90 % confidence interval (CI), 34-60 %; p < 0.0001). The response rate to preoperative chemotherapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was 34 %. Forty-six patients (98 %) underwent surgery, and curative resection was performed in 44 patients. Thirty-seven patients completed the protocol treatment. The most common toxicities of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were grade 3/4 neutropenia (42 %), febrile neutropenia (4 %), grade 2 anorexia (21 %), and fatigue (15 %). Treatment-related death and operative mortality was not observed in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and S-1 was well tolerated. This is promising as a preoperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with potentially resectable advanced gastric cancer.

The use of lentinan for treating gastric cancer

Natural compounds containing fungal β-glucans have been used to improve general health for thousands of years in China and Japan. Lentinan, the backbone of β-(1, 3)-glucan with β-(1, 6) branches, is one of the active ingredients purified from Shiitake mushrooms and has been approved as a biological response modifier for the treatment of gastric cancer in Japan. Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer remains an incurable disease, with survival rates being far from satisfactory. Recent clinical studies have shown that chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan prolongs the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer, as compared to chemotherapy alone. In addition, trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2/neu growth factor receptor, has been used for the treatment of gastric cancer in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Lentinan may exert a synergistic action with anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies to activate complement systems through the mechanism of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement dependent cytotoxicity. Because a better understanding of its biological activities should enable us to use lentinan more efficiently in the treatment of gastric cancer, immunological effects provided by β-glucans, a possible mode of action of lentinan, and its clinical application including future potential uses are discussed in the present review.

Addition of docetaxel to S-1 without platinum prolongs survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized study (START)

Purpose

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil has been globally accepted as a standard regimen for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, cisplatin has several disadvantages, including renal toxicity and the need for admission. S-1 plus cisplatin has become a standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer in East Asia. This phase III study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of adding docetaxel to S-1 without a platinum compound in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus S-1 or S-1 alone. The docetaxel plus S-1 group received docetaxel on day 1 and oral S-1 on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. The S-1 alone group received oral S-1 on days 1–28 of a 42-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results

Of the 639 patients enrolled, 635 were eligible for analysis. The median overall survival was 12.5 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 10.8 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.032). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 4.2 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.001). As for adverse events, neutropenia was more frequent in the docetaxel plus S-1 group, but remained manageable.

Conclusion

As first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, docetaxel plus S-1 significantly improves median overall and progression-free survival as compared with S-1 alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00287768).

Addition of docetaxel to S-1 without platinum prolongs survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized study (START)

PURPOSE

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil has been globally accepted as a standard regimen for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, cisplatin has several disadvantages, including renal toxicity and the need for admission. S-1 plus cisplatin has become a standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer in East Asia. This phase III study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of adding docetaxel to S-1 without a platinum compound in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus S-1 or S-1 alone. The docetaxel plus S-1 group received docetaxel on day 1 and oral S-1 on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. The S-1 alone group received oral S-1 on days 1-28 of a 42-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 639 patients enrolled, 635 were eligible for analysis. The median overall survival was 12.5 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 10.8 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.032). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 4.2 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.001). As for adverse events, neutropenia was more frequent in the docetaxel plus S-1 group, but remained manageable.

CONCLUSION

As first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, docetaxel plus S-1 significantly improves median overall and progression-free survival as compared with S-1 alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00287768).

Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen compared with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the highest cancer-mortality diseases with a high incidence rate in Asia. For surgically unfit but medically fit patients, palliative chemotherapy is the main treatment. The chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been used to treat the advanced stage or metastatic GC. It is necessary to compare effectiveness and toxicities of DCF regimen with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for GC.

METHODS

PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to select relative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCF to non-taxane-containing chemotherapy for patients with palliatively resected, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic GC. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates. Secondary outcome measures were median survival time (MST), median time to progression (TTP), response rate and toxicities.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were eligible and 1089 patients were analyzed totally (549 in DCF and 540 in control). DCF regimen increased partial response rate (38.8% vs 27.9%, p = 0.0003) and reduced progressive disease rate (18.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0005) compared to control regimen. Significant improvement of 2-year OS rate was found in DCF regimen (RR = 2.03, p = 0.006), but not of 1-year OS rate (RR = 1.22, p = 0.08). MST was significantly prolonged by DCF regimen (p = 0.039), but not median TTP (p = 0.054). Both 1-year OS rate and median TTP had a trend of prolongation by DCF regimen. Chemotherapy-related mortality was comparable (RR = 1.23, p = 0.49) in both regimens. In grade I-IV toxicities, DCF regimen showed a major raise of febrile neutropenia (RR = 2.33, p<0.0001) and minor raises of leucopenia (RR = 1.25, p<0.00001), neutropenia (RR = 1.19, p<0.00001), and diarrhea (RR = 1.59, p<0.00001), while in other toxicities there were no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

DCF regimen has better response than non-taxane containing regimen and could potentially improve the survival outcomes. The chemotherapy-related toxicity of DCF regimen is acceptable to some extent.

Phase I/II study of intraperitoneal docetaxel plus S-1 for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Purpose

We designed a phase I/II trial of intraperitoneal (IP) docetaxel plus S-1 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) and to evaluate its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

Methods

Patients with PC confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy received IP docetaxel on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (80 mg/m²) on days 1–14 every 4 weeks.

Results

In the phase I part (n = 12), each cohort received escalating doses of docetaxel (35–50 mg/m²); the MTD was determined to be 50 mg/m² and the RD was determined to be 45 mg/m². Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. In the phase II part (n = 27), the median number of courses was 4 (range 2–11). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70 % (95 % confidence interval 53–87 %). The overall response rate was 22 % and peritoneal cytology turned negative in 18 of 22 (81 %) patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included anorexia (19 %), neutropenia (7 %), and leukopenia (7 %).

Conclusion

IP docetaxel plus S-1 is active and safety in gastric cancer patients with PC.

Combination of low-dose docetaxel and standard-dose S-1 for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: efficacy, toxicity, and potential predictive factor

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low dose of docetaxel in combination with standard dose of S-1 for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer and to investigate whether the protein expression level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is a predictive factor of toxicities or responses.

METHODS

Between March 2010 and December 2011, 61 patients from the Department of Medical Oncology of Shanghai Zhong Shan Hospital, Fudan University, were enrolled in the study. Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with docetaxel of 40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 and S-1 of 80 mg/m(2) orally on days 1-14 every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic effects were evaluated following every 3 cycles of chemotherapy using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). The serum of peripheral blood was obtained at the start of the study and at each evaluation point to analyze the protein expression level of DPD, which was estimated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All the patients were followed-up until the time of progression, death, or the censor time, to calculate progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) time.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients [median age 60 years (range 28-76 years)] received a total of 318 treatment cycles [median 5 (range 2-9)], and 94 cycles of single S-1 maintenance treatment. One complete response (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR) were observed, with an overall response rate of 42.6%. A total of 29 patients (47.5%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 patients (9.8%) had progressive disease (PD). The disease control rate (DCR, CR + PR + SD) was 90.2%. Median overall survival was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.76-15.24 months], and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.61-7.39 months). Progression-free survival was far longer in peritoneal metastatic patients than that in patients with other metastases (7.3 ± 2. 6 vs. 5.4 ± 2.8 months; P < 0.05); however, this was not the case for OS. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was well controlled and grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities did not occur. Baseline expression level of DPD was not associated with efficacy. Lower expression level of DPD was correlated with high grade of toxicities (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This combination of standard dose of S-1 and low dose of docetaxel is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Peritoneal metastasis is treated more effectively by this regimen than other forms of metastases. Baseline DPD expression level in the serum is associated with toxicity, but not tumor response.

Phase I/II trial of a biweekly combination of S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (KRSG-0601)

Background:

Combination of S-1, an oral fluorouracil derivative, plus docetaxel against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed promising efficacy but clinically problematic emesis. A phase I/II study utilising a new schedule for this combination was conducted.

Methods:

A biweekly regimen of docetaxel on day 1 with oral S-1 on days 1–7 was administered to previously treated NSCLC patients. Doses of docetaxel/S-1 were escalated to 30/80, 35/80, and 40/80 mg m⁻², respectively, and its efficacy was investigated at the recommended dose below maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

Results:

In phase I study employing 13 patients, dose-limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and treatment delay, with the respective MTDs for docetaxel 40 mg m⁻²/S-1 80 mg m⁻². In the phase II study, 34 patients were treated with docetaxel 35 mg m⁻²/S-1 80 mg m⁻² for a median cycle of 6. The response and disease control rates were 34.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 18.6–50.0%) and 62.9% (95% CI, 46.8–72.9%), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 150.5 days. Haematologic grade 4 toxicities were observed in neutropenia (11.8%) and thrombocytopenia (2.9%). Regarding non-haematologic toxicities, including emesis, there were no grade 3/4 side effects.

Conclusion:

Combination of 1-week administration of S-1 with biweekly docetaxel is safe and active for NSCLC.

Docetaxel combined with irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a randomised phase II study

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and irinotecan chemotherapy have shown good efficacy in the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. This randomised phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of two non-platinum docetaxel-based doublet regimens in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer were randomised to receive either 3-weekly DI (docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) plus irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) (Day 1)) or 3-weekly DF (docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) (Day 1) followed by 5-fluorouracil 750 mg m(-2) per day as a continuous infusion (Days 1-5)).

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients received DI (n=42) or DF (n=43). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The ORR and time to progression (TTP) in the evaluable population (n=65) were 37.5% (DI) vs 33.3% (DF), and 4.2 months vs 4.4 months, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, the observed ORR, TTP and median overall survival were similar between the two groups. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and diarrhoea were more frequent in the DI arm as compared with the DF arm (83.3% vs 69.8%, 40.5% vs 18.6%, and 42.9% vs 16.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both docetaxel-based doublet regimens show comparable efficacy; however, the DF regimen was associated with a better toxicity profile and is an alternative treatment option for patients in whom platinum-based regimens are unsuitable.

Targeted therapies for gastric cancer: current status

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common cancers internationally. Unfortunately the majority of patients still present at an advanced stage, and despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, outcomes still remain poor with high mortality rates despite a decline in incidence. Whilst the utility of classical chemotherapy agents has been explored thoroughly (and continues to be investigated, alone or in various combinations), advances have been slow and the efficacy of these agents has reached a plateau. As such, the focus of recent study has shifted toward developing a greater understanding of the molecular biology of carcinogenesis and the cancer cell phenotype, and, in turn, the development of rationally designed drugs that target molecular aberrancies in signal transduction pathways specific to gastric cancer. These targets include circulating growth and angiogenic factors, cell surface receptors, and other molecules that comprise downstream intracellular signalling pathways, including receptor tyrosine kinases. Therapeutic advances in this area significantly lag behind other solid organ malignancies such as breast and colorectal cancer. This article reviews the role of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, including rationale and mechanism of action, current and emerging data, as single-agent therapy or in combination regimens. A recently published randomized phaseIII trial supporting the use of trastuzumab, an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu monoclonal antibody, in a selected population of patients is discussed. Therapies that have been evaluated in phase II trials are also reviewed, as well as promising new therapies currently being investigated in preclinical or phase I studies. There is optimism that targeted therapies, whether as single-agent therapy or in combination with traditional therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, may yet have an impact on improvement of the overall prognosis of gastric cancer.

Lentinan prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer receiving S-1-based chemotherapy

AIM: To examine whether administration of lentinan, purified β-1, 3-glucan, can prolong survival in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving S-1-based chemotherapy.

METHODS: Since 2004, 78 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer have received S-1-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Survival, side effects, and the ratio of granulocytes/lymphocytes (G/L ratio) were compared between 2 groups of patients who received chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan and chemotherapy alone.

RESULTS: Median overall survival was significantly longer in the former group than in the latter group [689 d (95% CI: 431-2339 d) vs 565 d (95% CI: 323-662 d), P = 0.0406]. In addition, the G/L ratio in patients who received lentinan was maintained around or below 2, which was significantly lower than that in patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Chemo-immunotherapy with lentinan offers a significant advantage over S-1-based chemotherapy alone in terms of survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A multicenter phase II study of combined chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (KDOG 0601)

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a triplet regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

Docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (70 or 60 mg/m(2)) were given on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. S-1 (40 mg/m(2)) was given twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment with this regimen was continued for a maximum of 6 cycles. Subsequently, patients with no disease progression received a combination of docetaxel and S-1.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The median number of administered cycles was 8 (range, 1-25). Because some patients had serious myelosuppression and renal dysfunction with 70 mg/m(2) of cisplatin, dose of cisplatin was reduced to 60 mg/m(2) after 19 patients had been treated. Common severe toxic effects of grade 3 or 4 were leukocytopenia (44%), neutropenia (72%), anemia (15%), and febrile neutropenia (14%). The overall response rate of this group was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI), 71-91%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6-21.5) and 8.7 (95% CI, 6.7-10.7) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Triplet of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 is a well-tolerated and highly active regimen for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A 60 mg/m(2) of cisplatin is as effective as 70 mg/m(2) of cisplatin.

Refining docetaxel-containing therapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer-the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide-is a global health problem. Most cases present at advanced stages and are incurable due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Although advanced gastric cancer is relatively chemosensitive, a gold standard chemotherapy regimen has yet to emerge, and response rates are of short duration. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) have emerged as the backbone agents in treating this disease. The pivotal V325 trial demonstrated the efficacy benefit of adding docetaxel to CF (DCF). DCF, however, is associated with significant toxicity, making it less tolerable to patients. As a result, docetaxel-containing regimens have been extensively studied and improved upon to mitigate toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Various dosing and scheduling permutations of the original DCF regimen have emerged, and substitutions with other 5-fluorouraci and platinum analogs have been studied. In this review we highlight some of these studies using docetaxel-based regimens as well as new approaches using targeted therapy, including monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Continuing efforts to improve the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, combining pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacogenetic correlates, will further assist in developing optimized regimens. Emerging data using targeted therapy and biologics in combination with chemotherapy are promising, but results of ongoing studies are required to establish the safety and efficacy of these regimens.

Increasing the frequency of CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy may decrease risk of death in gastric cancer patients

AIM: To analyze the correlation between cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells adoptive immunotherapy and cancer-related death in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six gastric cancer patients after operation at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were enrolled in this study. Their clinical data including demographic characteristics, operation time, tumor size, pathological type and staging, tumor metastasis, outcome of chemotherapy or CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy, survival time or time of death were collected with a standard structured questionnaire. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median survival time, and the 2- and 5- year survival rates. Hazard risk (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy for gastric cancer were calculated using the two-stage time-dependent covariates Cox model.

RESULTS: The survival time of gastric cancer patients was longer after CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy than after chemotherapy (χ² = 10.907, P = 0.001). The median survival time of gastric cancer patients was also longer after CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy than after chemotherapy (49 mo vs 27 mo, P < 0.05). The 2- and 5-year survival rates of gastric cancer patients were significantly higher after CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy than after chemotherapy (73.5% vs 52.6%, 40.4% vs 23.9%, P < 0.05). A significant difference was observed in the survival curve for patients who received CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy (0, 1-10, 11-25, and over 25 frequencies) (χ² = 14.534, P = 0.002). The frequencies of CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy were significantly related with the decreasing risk of death in gastric cancer patients after adjustment for sex and age of the patients, tumor stage and relapse (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.80) when the first stage Cox model was used to define the subjects who remained alive beyond 36 mo as survivors. However, no correlation was observed between the frequencies of death in CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy and the risk of gastric cancer patients (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89) when the second stage Cox model was used to define the subjects who survived for more than 36 mo as survivors.

CONCLUSION: The survival time of the gastric cancer patients treated with chemotherapy combined with CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy is significantly longer than that of the patients treated with chemotherapy alone and increasing the frequency of CIK cells adoptive immunotherapy seems to benefit patients more.

A randomized phase 2 study of docetaxel and S-1 versus docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer with an evaluation of SPARC expression for personalized therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 weekly docetaxel-based regimens as first-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer and to investigate the expression of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) and its abilities to predict treatment-related clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were randomly selected to receive 3 weekly cycles of docetaxel (35 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) plus S-1 (35 mg/m(2) each twice daily on days 1-14) (DS), or docetaxel plus cisplatin (35 mg/m(2) each on days 1 and 8) (DC). Endpoints included overall response rate (primary), survival, toxicity, and quality of life (secondary). SPARC expression in prechemotherapy specimens of primary gastric tumors was evaluated via immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. Confirmed overall response rates were 46% (95% confidence interval, 30%-62%) for DS and 24% (95% confidence interval, 11%-38%) for DC via intent-to-treat analysis. Median progression-free survival was 7.3 and 4.9 months and overall survival was 16.0 and 8.3 months for DS and DC, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity was neutropenia. Grade ≥ 3 mucositis (18%) and hand-foot syndrome (8%) were the toxicities most associated with DS, whereas anorexia (20%) and lethargy (20%) were more common with DC. High SPARC expression was related to early progression (hazard ratio, 3.67; P = .042) and poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.01; P = .010) in docetaxel chemotherapy on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes in this study favored DS over DC for further phase 3 study. The findings suggest that split-dose weekly docetaxel alleviates hematological toxicity without compromising efficacy, and that SPARC expression may help individualize therapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and S-1 combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly S-1 and docetaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy history were eligible for inclusion (n = 45). Patients received a total of 215 treatment courses (median, 4; range, 2-12) of S-1 oral administration twice daily for 1 week followed by a drug-free interval of 1 week. Docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15.

RESULTS

We observed 25 partial responses (55.6%) and one complete response (2.2%), resulting in an overall response rate of 57.8%. Twenty-four patients (53.3%) received second-line chemotherapy. Five patients (11.1%) underwent R0 gastrectomy during the course of the study. The median overall survival time was 15.3 months, the median time to progression was 6.9 months, and the median duration of response in 26 patients was 8.0 months. Neutropenia was the most frequently observed (40.4%) haematological toxicity at grades 3 and 4 and leucopenia was the second most common (29.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus docetaxel combination therapy in an outpatient setting provided promising activity with acceptable adverse toxicities.

Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, and biweekly administration of docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

We examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of S-1 and biweekly docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC were eligible if they had a performance status of 2 or less, were 80 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. Forty-nine patients (38 men and 11 women; median age, 66 years; range 43–79 years) were enrolled. Patients were treated with the combination of 80 mg/m² per day of S-1 for 14 consecutive days and 35 mg/m² of docetaxel on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks.

Results

The overall response rate was 16.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.6–30.5%). The disease-control rate was 49.0% (95% confidence interval, 34.4–63.7%). The median survival time after this treatment was 9 months (range 1–22 months). The median progression-free survival time was 3 months (range 1–11 months). Response rates and survival times did not differ significantly according to the histological type. Grade 3–5 toxicities included neutropenia in 51.0% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 2.0%, anemia in 20.4%, infection in 24.5%, anorexia in 12.2%, diarrhea in 14.3%, nausea in 6.1%, and dehydration in 4.2%. There was 1 treatment-related death due to severe anorexia, stomatitis, diarrhea, and, as consequence, dehydration.

Conclusions

The combination of S-1 and biweekly docetaxel is an acceptable therapeutic option in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC regardless of the histological type.

Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan

In the early 1990s, a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin was widely adopted to treat advanced gastric cancer; however, no survival advantage over single-agent 5-FU was confirmed by the results of randomized trials conducted over a long period. Recently developed agents such as irinotecan, taxanes (docetaxel), and new oral fluorouracil (S-1) have yielded more promising results, with a response rate of over 50% and a median survival time of over 10 months in combination studies. These newer combination regimens were investigated in various randomized phase III studies to clarify if the newer-generation regimens provided a survival advantage over the older-generation regimens. Based on the findings of a large randomized study, S-1 has become standard in the adjuvant setting after D2 dissection curatively resected stage II and III gastric cancer. This article reviews the recent advances in gastric cancer chemotherapy, especially in Japan.

Docetaxel: its role in current and future treatments for advanced gastric cancer

A globally accepted standard chemotherapy remains undetermined in gastric cancer, but the recent introduction of active "new-generation agents" such as taxanes, irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin, S-1, and capecitabine, offers hope for markedly improving patient outcomes. Docetaxel, as well as the other new-generation agents, plays a key role in the development of the new-era chemotherapy, and the incorporation of taxanes has provided several regimens, such as docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF), that could become standard treatment. The DCF regimen is now regarded as a standard treatment option in advanced gastric cancer in selected patients in good condition. Many institutions and cooperative groups continue to study a variety of docetaxel-based combinations with "new-generation cytotoxic agents" in various treatment settings, and recent attention has been focused on the incorporation of biological agents, such as cetuximab, bevacizumab, everolimus, and sunitinib, into docetaxel-containing combinations as another innovative approach. The ongoing clinical trials of a number of new regimens will clarify their clinical benefits in gastric cancer treatment. Along with the development of more active docetaxel combination regimens, the identification of predictive biomarkers for each regimen has been intensively studied recently. This review focuses on docetaxel as a key agent in gastric cancer chemotherapy, and discusses the role of this taxane in current and future treatments for advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of S-1, docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the activity and toxicity of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven, unresectable metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, performance status (PS) 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Patients received oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2) b.i.d.) on days 1-14 and intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled between March 2005 and April 2007. Three patients were considered ineligible and did not receive the DSC therapy. Clinical characteristics were as follows: median age, 63 years (range, 44-77); PS, 0/1/2: 23/8/0; women/men, 8/23; and well-differentiated/undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, 10/21. The objective response rate was 87.1% with 1 complete response (3.2%) and 26 partial responses (83.9%) in 31 assessable patients. Four had stable disease (12.9%) but none had progressive disease. Of these 27 responders, 8 (25.8%) achieved downstaging and 7 (22.6%) underwent curative surgery. The median survival time and progression-free survival were 687 days [confidence interval (95% CI), 600.0-1,138.1] and 226 days (95% CI, 182.5-379.3), respectively. Most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (77.4%). Most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included anorexia (35.5%) and nausea (32.3%). All treatment-related toxicities resolved, and no toxic deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

DCS combination chemotherapy is highly active against unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and can be given safely with proper management of adverse events. Further studies of this combination are warranted.

Dose-finding study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and activity of combined docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy on metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered intravenously on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle. The doses of docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 in the phase I study were level -1A, 52.5/80/60 mg/m(2); level -1B, 52.5/80/80 mg/m(2); level 1A, 52.5/105/80 mg/m(2); level 1B, 52.5/130/80 mg/m(2); level 2A, 60/105/80 mg/m(2); level 2B, 60/130/80 mg/m(2); level 3A, 67.5/105/80 mg/m(2); level 3B, 67.5/130/80 mg/m(2); level 4A, 75/105/80 mg/m(2); level 4B, 75/130/80 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled. One of six patients at level 1A and two of three patients at level 1B developed dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia) during the initial two cycles. Therefore, the doses used at levels 1B and 1A were defined as the MTD and RD, respectively. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. Six partial responses were noted, and the overall response rate was 67%.

CONCLUSION

The RD of the DOS regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer was docetaxel 52.5 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 105 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S-1 80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle. A phase II study using the RD is currently underway.

Cardiac tamponade due to metastasis from early gastric cancer

We report a case of cardiac tamponade caused by metastasis from early gastric cancer. A 44-year-old woman was detected to have an abnormality of the stomach on barium meal during an annual medical checkup. Gastroendoscopy disclosed superficial depressed gastric lesions, and histopathological examination of biopsy specimens revealed the diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) revealed no evidence of metastasis. We performed distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma confined to the mucosal layer. Lymphatic invasion was detected only in the mucosal region beneath the tumor; however, lymph node metastasis was found in almost half of dissected lymph nodes. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered on an outpatient basis with 36 courses of mitomycinC infused (8 mg/day) once every 4 weeks. However, 3 years after the surgery, the patient developed cardiac tamponade due to carcinomatous pericarditis. We performed drainage of the malignant effusion and initiated treatment with S-1 and docetaxel. Although the patient showed some clinical improvement, the patient died 15 months after the occurrence of cardiac tamponade.

Chemotherapy for gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients whose gastric cancer recurred after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. A total of 51 patients were evaluated. Twenty-one patients received S-1-containing chemotherapy as first-line treatment after recurrence [cohort A: S-1 plus cisplatin (n = 10), S-1 monotherapy (n = 7), S-1 plus irinotecan (n = 3) and S-1 plus docetaxel (n = 1)]. The other 30 patients received a non-S-1-containing regimen [cohort B: paclitaxel or docetaxel (n = 22), irinotecan plus cisplatin (n = 6) and other drugs (n = 2)]. No objective responses occurred in cohort A, while five patients achieved a partial response in cohort B (response rate, 0 versus 16%; P = 0.04). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in cohort B than in cohort A (4.3 versus 2.3 months, P = 0.02). S-1-containing chemotherapy does not appear to be effective in patients whose gastric cancer recurs after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy. Other chemotherapeutic agents should be evaluated in this setting.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: ongoing phase III study of S-1 alone versus S-1 and docetaxel combination (JACCRO GC03 study)

Study rationale, objectives, design, methods, and statistical considerations of an ongoing phase III study comparing S-1 alone versus the S-1/docetaxel combination are reviewed. This study is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, nonblinded, randomized, phase III study of subjects with advanced gastric cancer. Subjects are to be randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of Treatment Arm A (docetaxel and S-1) or 6-week cycles of Treatment Arm B (S-1 only). The primary objective of the study is to compare median overall survival of the test arm (docetaxel and S-1) to the control arm (S-1 only) in subjects with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess the time-to-tumor progression (TTP), defined as time from randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), to determine the clinical response (RR), defined as the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and to evaluate the safety of the two regimens. A total of 628 subjects (314 in each treatment arm) will be enrolled. Subject enrollment began in September 2005 and lasts approximately 3 years. We have already enrolled 556 patients (88.5%: Japan, 346 cases; Korea, 210 cases) from 103 centers (Japan, 86 centers; Korea, 17 centers) between December 2005 and February 2008. We are expecting full enrollment at the end of August 2008. The JACCRO GC-03 study is now ongoing. After 2 years follow-up from full enrollment, in 2010 we will report the final results of this study.

Chemotherapy for metastatic disease: review from JCOG trials

The Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (GIOSG/JCOG) has conducted several clinical trials to establish standard chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. From the late 1980s to early 1990s, two phase II studies by JCOG evaluated oral fluoropyrimidines, and others introduced Western chemotherapy regimens. Thereafter, the first phase III study (JCOG9205), comparing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU plus ciplatin (CDDP) (FP), and uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus mitomycin (UFTM), could not show a survival benefit of either FP or UFTM over 5-FU alone. In the late 1990s, new active agents such as irinotecan (CPT-11) and S-1 (new oral fluoropyrimidine) showed promising results in their phase II trials. The latest phase III study (JCOG9912), comparing 5-FU, CPT-11 plus CDDP, and S-1, showed significant noninferiority of S-1 to 5-FU in overall survival, associated with a better response rate and progression-free survival and acceptable toxicities, and concluded that S-1 should be considered for the standard chemotherapy of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Simultaneously, another Japanese phase III trial comparing S-1 with S-1 plus CDDP showed a survival benefit of S-1 plus CDDP. At present, S-1 plus CDDP is recognized as standard chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, and new treatment with molecular target agents is under development.

Phase I dose escalation study of docetaxel with a fixed dose of S-1 in combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The primary objectives of this study were to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in combination with a fixed dose of S-1 and to determine the recommended dose (RD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma with metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease were eligible. Patients received intravenous docetaxel starting at 40 mg/m(2) (dose level 1), and stepwise dose increases to 50, 60, and 70 mg/m(2) were planned for successive patient cohorts (dose levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively) over 1 h on day 1 and oral S-1 administered at a fixed dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, both drugs every 21 days.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were enrolled into this trial. All three patients at dose level 3 developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and this level was declared to be the MTD. Hence, level 2 (docetaxel 50 mg/m(2)) was declared to be the RD for the next study. As 9 of the 13 enrolled patients responded to treatment, the overall objective response rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 44.1-94.3%). The median time to progression was 8.38 months (range 1.44-8.51) and the overall survival duration was 9.9 months (range 0.62-11.57). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity of docetaxel plus S-1 was neutropenia, which was tolerable and manageable.

CONCLUSION

This regimen showed encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in advanced gastric carcinoma and could be used in further randomized studies.

Capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Although the role of systemic chemotherapy has been established for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Based on the results of several randomized Phase III trials, 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion plus cisplatin, with or without epirubicin, has become the global reference regimen for this patient population. However, treatment with fluorouracil infusion requires either frequent hospitalizations or the use of a central venous access device, harboring potential complications. Capecitabine, a tumor-activating oral prodrug of fluorouracil, may be more advantageous in terms of patient convenience, safety and efficacy. Two recent randomized Phase III trials have shown that capecitabine could replace infusional fluorouracil in cisplatin-based regimens. Furthermore, Phase II trials have shown that many other capecitabine-based doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens incorporating newer cytotoxic agents are active and well tolerated. Many promising biological agents are now being tested in Phase III trials, incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms, in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The role of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer

S-1 is a potent antitumour drug in gastric cancer. After years of disagreement about the utility of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, several studies have recently demonstrated the efficacy of S-1 in both the adjuvant and primary settings. In this Minireview, the value of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer is discussed.

Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma

We designed a phase I/II trial of S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) and to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity in metastatic gastric carcinoma (MGC). Patients with measurable disease received S-1 orally b.i.d. on days 1–14 and docetaxel intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. In phase I (n=30), each cohort received escalating doses of S-1 (30–45 mg m⁻² b.i.d.) and docetaxel (25–40 mg m⁻²); MTD was 45 mg m⁻² b.i.d. S-1/35 mg m⁻² docetaxel and RD was 40 mg m⁻² b.i.d. S-1/35 mg m⁻² docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 elevated liver enzymes, gastric perforation, grade 3 diarrhoea/fatigue, febrile neutropenia with grade 3 anorexia/fatigue, and neutropenic infection with grade 3 stomatitis/anorexia. In phase II (n=52), the overall response rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.8–79.6%) and the median time to progression and overall survival were 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.9–8.1) and 13.7 months (95% CI: 9.9–17.5), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (29.4%), and febrile neutropenia/neutropenic infection occurred in 19.6% of patients. Non-haematological toxicities were generally mild. There was one treatment-related death due to pneumonitis. S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel is active in MGC with moderate toxicities.

Phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

A phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and objective response rate (RR) in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-14. Paclitaxel was injected intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15, starting with a dose of 50 mg/m(2). The dose was increased in a stepwise manner.

RESULTS

In phase I, level 2 (60 mg/m(2)) was considered the MTD, because 2 of 3 patients in level 2 developed DLTs (grade 3 neutropenia and anemia, and grade 4 diarrhea and stomatitis). Therefore, the RD was determined to be level 1 (50 mg/m(2)). In phase II, efficacy and safety were assessed in 18 patients treated with the RD. The RR was 64.7% and the median survival time was 13.5 months. The most severe toxicities were grade 3 leukopenia (5.5%) and grade 3 neutropenia (5.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that S-1 combined with 50 mg/m(2) paclitaxel is effective and safe in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.