A phase 2 trial of durvalumab treatment following radiation monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy: The SPIRAL-RT study

BACKGROUND

Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab is the standard treatment for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only half of the patients are allowed to receive CCRT in real-world settings. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab after radiation monotherapy for NSCLC patients who are ineligible for chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

A single-arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II trial was conducted in Japan. The patients received radiation (54-66 Gy) followed by durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 12 months). The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between September 2019 and April 2021, 33 patients were enroled from eight institutions. The median patient age was 79 years, and the majority of patients were male (78.8%). The 1-year PFS rate was 39.1% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 24.7-54.6%). Three patients (9.1%) had a performance status of 2. The ORR was 42.4% (95% CI: 27.2-59.2%). The median PFS and OS were 8.9 (95% CI: 7.4-19.4) and 20.8 (95% CI: 15.8-not estimable) months, respectively. The most common adverse event was radiation pneumonitis (51.5%). The median treatment duration was 6.4 (range: 0.50-12.0) months for durvalumab. At the endpoint, 30.3% (10/33) of the patients had completed 1 year of durvalumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab is an effective treatment with tolerable toxicity following radiation monotherapy in stage III NSCLC patients who are ineligible for chemoradiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

JMA-IIA00434 (jRCT).

A protocol of a single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of ramucirumab and erlotinib in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (SPIRAL-BRAIN study)

Background

The combination of erlotinib, a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) antibody, is one of the most effective treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutation. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of this combination treatment for patients with brain metastases.

Methods

This single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study will recruit 32 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (except for T790M mutation) and brain metastases (asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Patients will be treated with erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/body once daily and ramucirumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is intracranial overall response rate (iORR) and the secondary endpoints are intracranial disease control rate, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial ORR, extracranial PFS, ORR, overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned number of enrollments was calculated based on a one-sample binomial test (normal approximation) with a two-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected iORR is 65% and the iORR threshold is 40%.

Discussion

A prospective study to confirm the safety and efficacy of the combined erlotinib plus ramucirumab treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases is ongoing.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051220059.

Prophylactic treatment of dacomitinib-induced skin toxicities in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, Phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. However, dacomitinib often causes skin toxicities, resulting in treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate a prophylactic strategy for skin toxicity induced by dacomitinib.

METHODS

We performed a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial for comprehensive skin toxicity prophylaxis. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations were enrolled and received dacomitinib with comprehensive prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of skin toxicity (Grade ≥2) in the initial 8 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 41 Japanese patients participated between May 2019 and April 2021 from 14 institutions (median age 70 years; range: 32-83 years), 20 were male, and 36 had a performance status of 0-1. Nineteen patients had exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation. More than 90% of patients were perfectly compliant with prophylactic minocycline administration. Skin toxicities (Grade ≥2) occurred in 43.9% of patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 31.2%-56.7%). The most frequent skin toxicity was acneiform rash in 11 patients (26.8%), followed by paronychia in five patients (12.2%). Due to skin toxicities, eight patients (19.5%) received reduced doses of dacomitinib. The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.6 months) and median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 17.0 months-not reached).

CONCLUSION

Although the prophylactic strategy was ineffective, the adherence to prophylactic medication was quite good. Patient education regarding prophylaxis is important and can lead to improved treatment continuity.

Ramucirumab Plus Docetaxel for Patients with Non-small cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Multicenter, Open-Label Single-Arm Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel combination therapy (DOC/RAM) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) achieves favorable outcomes; however, efficacy and safety for patients with brain metastases are still unclear.

METHODS

Eligible patients included those with advanced NSCLC with measurable asymptomatic brain metastases that progressed after chemotherapy. Patients were intravenously administered ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2) every 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Due to difficulties in accumulating the planned 65 participants, enrollment was terminated early when 25 patients were enrolled. Primary endpoint: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-5.3). Secondary endpoints: Median intracranial progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.9); median overall survival was 20.9 months (95% CI, 6.6-not possible to estimate); objective response rate was 20% (95% CI, 6.8-40.7); disease control rate was 68% (95% CI, 46.5-85.1). The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia in 10 patients (40%). Neither intracranial hemorrhage nor grade 5 adverse events were observed. Patients with higher serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 concentrations at the start of treatment had slightly longer PFS.

CONCLUSION

No clinical concerns were identified with DOC/RAM for NSCLC with brain metastases in this study. Further investigation with a larger sample size is needed to determine the tolerability and safety of these populations (Trial Identifiers: University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan [UMIN000024551] and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [jRCTs071180048]).

Comprehensive Kinase Activity Profiling Revealed the Kinase Activity Patterns Associated with the Effects of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Sensitizing EGFR Mutations

EGFR mutations are strong predictive markers for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations have better prognoses, some patients exhibit worse prognoses. We hypothesized that various activities of kinases could be potential predictive biomarkers for EGFR-TKI treatment among NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. In 18 patients with stage IV NSCLC, EGFR mutations were detected and comprehensive kinase activity profiling was performed using the peptide array PamStation12 for 100 tyrosine kinases. Prognoses were observed prospectively after the administration of EGFR-TKIs. Finally, the kinase profiles were analyzed in combination with the prognoses of the patients. Comprehensive kinase activity analysis identified specific kinase features, consisting of 102 peptides and 35 kinases, in NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. Network analysis revealed seven highly phosphorylated kinases: CTNNB1, CRK, EGFR, ERBB2, PIK3R1, PLCG1, and PTPN11. Pathway analysis and Reactome analysis revealed that the PI3K-AKT and RAF/ MAPK pathways were significantly enriched in the poor prognosis group, being consistent with the outcome of the network analysis. Patients with poor prognoses exhibited high activation of EGFR, PIK3R1, and ERBB2. Comprehensive kinase activity profiles may provide predictive biomarker candidates for screening patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations.

Changes in blood pressure and arterial stiffness monitored using the cardio-ankle vascular index during hemodialysis

During hemodialysis (HD), blood pressure (BP) changes are frequently observed. However, the mechanism of BP changes during HD has not been fully clarified. The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) reflects the arterial stiffness of the arterial tree from the origin of the aorta to the ankle independent from BP during measurement. Additionally, CAVI reflects functional stiffness in addition to structural stiffness. We aimed to clarify the role of CAVI in regulating the BP system during HD. We included 10 patients undergoing 4-hour HD (total 57 HD sessions). Changes in the CAVI and various hemodynamic parameters were evaluated during each session. During HD, BP decreased and CAVI significantly increased (CAVI, median [interquartile range]; 9.1 [8.4-9.8] [0 min] to 9.6 [9.2-10.2] [240 min], p < 0.05). Changes in CAVI from 0 min to 240 min were significantly correlated with water removal rate (WRR) (r = -0.42, p = 0.002). Changes in CAVI at each measurement point were negatively correlated with ΔBP (Δsystolic BP_{each MP}, r = -0.23, p < 0.0001; Δdiastolic BP_{each MP}, r = -0.12, p = 0.029). Whereas one patient exhibited a simultaneous decrease in BP and CAVI during the initial 60 min of HD. Arterial stiffness monitored with CAVI generally increased during HD. CAVI elevation is associated with decreased WWR and BP. An increase in CAVI during HD may reflect the contraction of smooth muscle cells and play an important role in BP maintenance. Hence, measuring CAVI during HD may distinguish the cause of BP changes.

A Phase II Trial on Osimertinib as a First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients: The SPIRAL-0 Study

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is one of the standard first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, because it achieves significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than conventional first-line treatments (hazard ratio: 0.46). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remain unclear.

METHODS

This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS rate; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 1-year PFS rate was 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1%-72.7%), which did not meet the primary endpoint (the threshold 1-year PFS rate of 50% predicted using data from the NEJ003 study). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were rash/dermatitis acneiform/ALT increased/hypokalemia (2 patients, 5%). Seven patients developed pneumonitis (17.5%). There were no other cases of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events other than pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, osimertinib was tolerable for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [JRCT] ID number: jRCTs071180007).

Safety and Immunogenicity of mRNA Vaccines Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Multicenter Observational Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cancer have been prioritized for vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Nevertheless, there are limited data regarding the safety, efficacy, and risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with mRNA vaccines in patients with lung cancer, especially those being actively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

This multicenter observational study was conducted at nine hospitals in Japan. Patients with lung cancer (≥20 y) actively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors between 4 weeks prefirst vaccination and 4 weeks postsecond vaccination were enrolled. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs of any grade on the basis of an assumed incidence without vaccination rate of 35%. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring anti-spike (S)-IgG antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients with lung cancer (median age, 71 y; interquartile range, 65-74) were enrolled from May to November 2021 and followed up until December 2021. There were 26 patients (20.6%, 95% confidence interval: 13.9%-28.8%) and seven patients (5.6%, 95% confidence interval: 2.3%-11.1%) who developed irAEs of any grade pre- and postvaccination, respectively, which was lower than the predicted incidence without vaccination. None of the patients experienced exacerbation of preexisting irAE postvaccination. S-IgG antibodies were seroconverted in 96.7% and 100% of the patients with lung cancer and controls, respectively, but antibody levels were significantly lower in patients with lung cancer (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung cancer who were actively treated with ICIs were safely vaccinated without an increased incidence of irAEs; however, their vaccine immunogenicity was lower. This requires further evaluation.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in patients with cancer cachexia and low body mass index

Background

Cancer cachexia is a syndrome characterized by anorexia and decreased body weight. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anamorelin, an orally active, selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index (BMI).

Methods

This multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study enrolled Japanese patients with non–small cell lung cancer or gastrointestinal cancer with cancer cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m², involuntary weight loss > 2% in the last 6 months, and anorexia). Patients were administered 100 mg of anamorelin once daily for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was a composite clinical response (CCR) at 9 weeks, which was defined as an increase in body weight of ≥5% from the baseline, an increase of ≥2 points in the score of the 5‐item Anorexia Symptom Scale of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and being alive.

Results

One hundred two patients were eligible and enrolled. The means and standard deviations for age and BMI were 71.0 ± 8.2 years and 17.47 ± 1.48 kg/m², respectively. The CCR rate at 9 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3%‐35.3%), which met the primary end point with a lower 95% CI exceeding the prespecified minimum of 8%. Improvements in body weight and anorexia were durable and were accompanied by improvements in patients' global impression of change for appetite/eating‐related symptoms and overall condition. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 37 of 101 treated patients (36.6%), with the most common being glycosylated hemoglobin increases, constipation, and peripheral edema.

Conclusions

Anamorelin improved body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and a low BMI with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability.

Lay Summary

Anamorelin is a drug that stimulates appetite and promotes weight gain.

This clinical trial was aimed at determining its efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients with a low body mass index and cachexia, a syndrome associated with anorexia and weight loss.

Anamorelin was found to improve body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in these patients, and these effects were durable for up to 24 weeks. Moreover, anamorelin was generally well tolerated.

These findings suggest that anamorelin is a valuable treatment option for patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index.

This single‐arm trial is aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in Japanese patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index. Anamorelin improves body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability.

Comparison of Body Fluid Volumes Determined by Kinetic Modeling and by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) method is used in individual patients requiring body fluid volume measurement. In a hemodialysis facility, however, regular screening of body fluid volumes is also necessary. Such screening, by kinetic modeling, may become possible by calculating distribution volumes of urea and uric acid from regular blood test results. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim is to compare uric acid distribution volumes with BIS-extracellular volume, urea distribution volume with BIS-total body water, and difference between urea and uric acid distribution volumes with BIS-intracellular volume. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We reanalyzed stored blood test data of 53 hemodialysis patients obtained together with BIS data of the same patients in our previous study. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Significant correlations were found between urea distribution volume and total body water predicted by the BIS method, between uric acid distribution volume and extracellular volume predicted by the BIS method, and between the difference of uric acid distribution volume from urea distribution volume and intracellular volume predicted by the BIS method. In Bland-Altman analysis, comparison of each pair showed no systematic error. The mean difference between each pair was minimal. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Fluid volumes in different body compartments can be estimated by kinetic modeling as well as by the BIS method.

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Lung Immune Prognostic Index as Prognostic Predictors for Combination Therapies of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Anticancer Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapies (chemoimmunotherapy) is associated with significantly better survival outcomes than cytotoxic chemotherapies alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) are prognostic biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapies. Thus, we aimed to examine whether these factors could also be prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. We retrospectively examined 237 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy. In the total group, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Multivariate analysis of OS and PFS revealed significant differences based on PNI and LIPI. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was also significantly associated with OS and PFS. PNI and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of <50% and poor LIPI (regardless of PD-L1 TPS) were associated with poor prognosis. PNI and LIPI predicted survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, especially in patients with PD-L1 TPS <50%. For patients in this poor category, chemoimmunotherapy may result in a worse prognosis than expected.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

HER3 activation contributes toward the emergence of ALK inhibitor-tolerant cells in ALK-rearranged lung cancer with mesenchymal features

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have shown dramatic efficacy in patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer; however, complete response in these patients is rare. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the emergence and maintenance of drug-tolerant cells in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cell based-assays demonstrated that HER3 activation and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition, mediated through ZEB1 proteins, help maintain cell survival and induce the emergence of ALK-TKI-tolerant cells. Compared with ALK-TKIs alone, cotreatment with pan-HER inhibitor afatinib and ALK-TKIs prevented tumor regrowth, leading to the eradication of tumors in ALK-rearranged tumors with mesenchymal features. Moreover, pre-treatment vimentin expression in clinical specimens obtained from patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer was associated with poor ALK-TKI treatment outcomes. These results demonstrated that HER3 activation plays a pivotal role in the emergence of ALK-TKI-tolerant cells. Furthermore, the inhibition of HER3 signals combined with ALK-TKIs dramatically improves treatment outcomes for ALK-rearranged lung cancer with mesenchymal features.

Inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling increased apoptosis and prevented the emergence of ALK-TKI-tolerant cells in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have improved clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK- rearrangements. However, a small population of tumor cells survives due to adaptive resistance under drug pressure and ultimately acquires drug resistance. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the prevention of drug resistance to improve the prognosis of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. We identified novel adaptive resistance, generated through c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/c-Jun signaling, to initial ALK-TKIs-alectinib and brigatinib-in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Inhibition of JNK/c-Jun axis showed suppression of growth and promotion of apoptosis induced by ALK-TKIs in drug-tolerant cells. JNK inhibition, in combination with the use of ALK-TKIs, increased cell apoptosis through repression of the Bcl-xL proteins, compared with ALK-TKI monotherapy. Importantly, combination therapy targeting JNK and ALK significantly delayed the regrowth following cessation of these treatments. Together, our results demonstrated that JNK pathway activation plays a pivotal role in the intrinsic resistance to ALK-TKIs and the emergence of ALK-TKI-tolerant cells in ALK-rearranged NSCLC, thus indicating that optimal inhibition of tolerant signals combined with ALK-TKIs may potentially improve the outcome of ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Impact of maintenance therapy following induction immunochemotherapy for untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to identify the potential predictors to assess the impact of maintenance therapy after induction immunochemotherapy in the real-world setting of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 152 patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunochemotherapy at 8 hospitals in Japan between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients who received at least four cycles of induction immunochemotherapy and one cycle of maintenance therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors were included. We investigated the biomarkers for progression-free survival (PFS) for maintenance therapy after induction immunochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Out of the 92 patients with advanced NSCLC included in the study, 42 received maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents, whereas 50 received maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents. Among those who received maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents, responders to prior immunochemotherapy had significantly longer PFS than non-responders (p = 0.004), except those with maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents. In non-responders to prior immunochemotherapy, patients with maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents had significantly longer PFS than those with maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents (log-rank p = 0.007), whereas, among responders to prior immunochemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS for different maintenance regimens (log-rank p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study showed that response to prior immunochemotherapy was associated with clinical outcomes among patients with advanced NSCLC who received maintenance therapy.

Late-onset Pleural and Pericardial Effusion as Immune-related Adverse Events after 94 Cycles of Nivolumab

A 67-year-old man with primary lung adenocarcinoma was hospitalized due to massive bilateral pleural effusion and pericardial effusion after 94 cycles of nivolumab therapy. We were unable to identify the cause of these effusions using blood tests, cytology tests, or bacterial culture of pleural effusion and thoracoscopy. Finally, we administrated corticosteroids, which immediately improved the fluid accumulation. This case may support the introduction of corticosteroids for late-onset pleural and pericardial effusion during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. However, the safety of rechallenge of ICIs after the improvement of fluid accumulation is controversial.

Shared decision making for the initiation and continuation of dialysis: a proposal from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy

Background

In Japan, forgoing life-sustaining treatment to respect the will of patients at the terminal stage is not stipulated by law. According to the Guidelines for the Decision-Making Process in Terminal-Stage Healthcare published by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2007, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) developed a proposal that was limited to patients at the terminal stage and did not explicitly cover patients with dementia. This proposal for the shared decision-making process regarding the initiation and continuation of maintenance hemodialysis was published in 2014.

Methods and results

In response to changes in social conditions, the JSDT revised the proposal in 2020 to provide guidance for the process by which the healthcare team can provide the best healthcare management and care with respect to the patient's will through advance care planning and shared decision making. For all patients with end-stage kidney disease, including those at the nonterminal stage and those with dementia, the decision-making process includes conservative kidney management.

Conclusions

The proposal is based on consensus rather than evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. The healthcare team is therefore not guaranteed to be legally exempt if the patient dies after the policies in the proposal are implemented and must respond appropriately at the discretion of each institution.

Impact of tumor programmed death ligand-1 expression on osimertinib efficacy in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study

Background

Osimertinib monotherapy is currently the standard of care as a first-line treatment for patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations; however, some EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients exhibit primary resistance and an insufficient response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors was reported as a negative predictive factor for outcomes of first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Methods

We prospectively assessed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib at 14 institutions in Japan between September 2019 and December 2020. Relationships between outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy and patients’ characteristics were reviewed.

Results

Seventy-one patients who underwent the tumor PD-L1 test were enrolled. Multivariate analysis identified tumor PD-L1 expression as an independent predictor for progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib treatment (P=0.029). The objective-response and disease-control rates for osimertinib treatment were significantly lower in patients demonstrating elevated PD-L1 levels relative to those with low or negative PD-L1 level (P=0.043 and P=0.007, respectively). Furthermore, among patients treated with osimertinib, those with high PD-L1 levels exhibited shorter PFS relative to those with low plus negative PD-L1 level (median PFS: 5.0 vs. 17.4 months; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Elevated tumor PD-L1 expression is associated with poor outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Further clinical trials are warranted to accumulate evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of combination therapy with osimertinib for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients with elevated tumor PD-L1 expression.

Trial Registration

UMIN000043942.

Early discontinuation of induction therapy in chemoimmunotherapy as an effective alternative to the standard regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate whether induction chemotherapy with less than four courses is as effective as induction chemotherapy with more than four courses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 249 patients with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy at 12 centers in Japan between January and December 2019. The patient group that completed less than four courses owing to adverse events (AEs), and received subsequent maintenance therapy was compared to the group that received at least four courses of induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

On univariate and multivariate analyses, the patient group that transitioned to maintenance therapy after completing less than four courses of induction chemotherapy had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those who completed at least four courses (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-3.37, p < 0.001 and HR 2.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.84, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no obvious difference in PFS between the group in which induction chemotherapy ended in two or three courses leading to partial or complete response, and the group that continued at least four courses of induction chemotherapy (log-rank test p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy may be maintained if induction chemotherapy is completed in less than four courses owing to development of AEs, and is administered for more than two courses with partial or complete response; efficacy is maintained even on transitioning to maintenance therapy.

Clinical impact of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy is considered to be one of the standard treatment options for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical significance of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC has not yet been fully understood. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate how aging affects the therapeutic impact of chemotherapy combine with immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with the combination therapy of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy between January 2019 and December 2019 at 12 institutions in Japan. We analyzed the clinical impacts of age on the following two groups: those who received pembrolizumab with platinum and pemetrexed (pemetrexed regimen) and those who received pembrolizumab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel (paclitaxel regimen). Progression-free and overall survival were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with NSCLC than in non-elderly patients (aged <75 years) with NSCLC in the pemetrexed regimen group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in progression-free and overall survival between elderly patients and non-elderly patients with NSCLC in the paclitaxel regimen group. In elderly patients with NSCLC, a programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of ≥50% was significantly associated with progression-free survival, and performance status of ≥2 was significantly associated with overall survival. Low albumin level (<3.5 g/dL) was significantly associated with both progression-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The results of this retrospective study show that the pemetrexed regimen, but not the paclitaxel regimen, was related to poor clinical outcomes in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcome of combined chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Although previous studies suggest that cancer cachexia is a poor prognostic factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the impact of cancer cachexia on chemoimmunotherapy is unclear. We investigated the impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively analyzed patients' medical records with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy in 12 institutions in Japan between January and November 2019. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss exceeding 5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of < 20 kg/m2 and weight loss of more than 2% of the total body weight within 6 months before chemoimmunotherapy initiation, with laboratory results exceeding reference values. This study enrolled 235 patients with NSCLC, among whom 196 were eligible for analysis, and 50 (25.5%) met the criteria for cachexia diagnosis. Patients with cancer cachexia had a significantly higher frequency of a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥ 50% (48%, p = .01) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS; log-rank test: p = .04) than patients without cachexia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the cachexia and no-cachexia groups (log-rank test: p = .14). In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% population, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS (log-rank test: p = .19 and p = .79, respectively) between patients with NSCLC in the cachexia or no-cachexia groups. Cancer cachexia might be a poor prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

The Impact of VEGF Inhibition on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy have increased survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis, is an immunological modulator; therefore, it is expected that anti-VEGF therapy in combination with ICIs enhances the antitumor effect of ICIs. In the present study, we investigated the impact of VEGF inhibition on clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients, including the efficacy of ICI treatment.

Methods

A total of 105 patients with advanced NSCLC who had been treated with ICIs were retrospectively analyzed to examine the relationship between the history of treatment with anti-VEGF agents and the clinical outcomes with ICI monotherapy.

Results

Patients who had received anti-VEGF therapy prior to ICIs showed shortened progression-free survival of ICI treatment and a decreased overall response rate to ICI treatment. By contrast, anti-VEGF therapy after ICI treatment was associated with increased survival, especially in patients who had also received anti-VEGF therapy prior to ICI therapy.

Conclusions

These retrospective observations suggest that anti-VEGF therapy prior to ICIs might be a negative predictor of response to ICIs. The sequence of anti-VEGF therapy might play a role in its ability to predict survival in NSCLC patients. Further investigation is warranted to identify the role of VEGF inhibition in altering clinical outcomes after immunotherapy.

Anlotinib combined with gefitinib can significantly improve the proliferation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo

Background

The effect of anlotinib combined with epidermal growth factor receptor TKIs (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the possible molecular mechanisms are still unclear.

Methods

From April 2018 to June 2020, 20 patients with advanced NSCLC who had developed potential acquired drug resistance after receiving gefitinib or icotinib were enrolled. Anlotinib (12 mg orally, once a day) was added to the targeted drug at the original dose. Patients underwent computed tomography every 8 weeks, and the curative effect and related side effects were observed. Furthermore, in vitro experiments were performed to study the effect of anlotinib alone or in combination with gefitinib on the proliferation and clone-forming ability of NSCLC cells (A549 cells: EGFR wild-type; H1975 cells: with L858R and T790M mutations). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of related proteins (Ki-67, CD31, EGFR, P-EGFR, VEGFR2, and p-VEGFR2).

Results

After the administration of anlotinib, 8 patients were in a stable condition and continued to receive treatment, and the best efficacy disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The median follow-up time was 6.6 months (4.08-8.28 months). The median progression-free survival was 15.7 months (10.19-18.87 months). The levels of the tumor marker (carcinoembryonic antigen) were found to be significantly decreased in seven patients. The main adverse reactions reported after anlotinib administration were hypertension, hand-foot-skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, oral ulcers, and anorexia.In the in vitro experiment, anlotinib combined with gefitinib significantly inhibited the proliferation and cloning ability of lung cancer cells. In the nude mouse model, this combination treatment significantly inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells. Immunohistochemical results showed that anlotinib combined with gefitinib significantly inhibited the expression of Ki-67, CD31, EGFR, P-EGFR, VEGFR2, and p-VEGFR2 in tumor tissues.

Conclusions

Anlotinib combined with gefitinib inhibited the proliferation of EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cells in vitro and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. It also significantly improved the treatment efficacy for some patients, delaying disease progression and improving survival, with only mild side effects. This drug combination is therefore a promising treatment for patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant and potentially secondary drug-resistant advanced NSCLC.

TTF-1 and c-MYC-defined Phenotypes of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Delta-like Protein 3 Expression for Treatment Selection

The standard treatment regimen has not yet been established for advanced pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) because of its rarity. LCNEC can be subdivided into 2 mutually exclusive molecular subgroups: STK11/KEAP1 and TP53 mutated with high neuroendocrine expression and transcriptional profile of ASCL1high/DLL3high/NOTCHlow (non-small cell lung carcinoma, NSCLC-like) or RB1 and TP53 mutated with reduced neuroendocrine markers and transcriptional pattern of ASCL1low/DLL3low/NOTCHhigh (small cell lung cancer, SCLC-like). Model-based clustering shows that SCLC has subdivided into 2 major proteomic subsets defined by either TTF-1high/c-MYClow or TTF-1low/c-MYChigh, which may correspond to 2 mutually exclusive molecular subgroups: NSCLC-like or SCLC-like, respectively. We herein investigated whether TTF-1 and c-MYC could be applied to LCNEC to identify distinct subsets immunohistochemically and assessed DLL3 expression in these subsets. The protein expression profile may be useful to select patients for potential efficacy of targeted therapies including aurora kinase inhibitors for MYC alterations or anti-DLL3 antibody-drug conjugates. TTF-1 and c-MYC expression was mutually exclusive in 25 of 27 (93%) cases; TTF-1+/c-MYC- in 10, TTF-1-/c-MYC+ in 15, and TTF-1+/c-MYC+ in 2. DLL3 expression was seen in 15 of 27 cases (56%). All 12 TTF-1+ LCNEC cases were positive for DLL3. Three of 15 (20%) TTF-1-/c-MYC+ cases showed DLL3 positivity. LCNEC could be separated into 2 subsets proteomically defined by TTF-1 and c-MYC expression, which may be suitable to guide treatment selection including aurora kinase inhibitors for c-MYC+ cases. TTF-1 positivity can serve as a surrogate marker for DLL3, but caution is necessary as 20% of TTF-1- cases showed DLL3 positivity.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Are Associated With Clinical Benefit in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Background

The immunotherapy plus chemotherapy combination is one of the most promising treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy often causes immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which have been reported to be associated with the good clinical outcomes. However, the effects of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the association between irAEs caused by immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and clinical efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with advanced NSCLC, who received a combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy at six institutions in Japan between January 2019 and September 2019. We examined the effect of irAEs on various clinical outcomes.

Results

We included 70 patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with irAEs and patients without irAEs. Patients with irAEs had significantly longer progression-free survival than those without irAEs on univariate (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.93, p = 0.026) and multivariate (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29–0.97, p = 0.041) analyses. In addition, patients with grade 1–2 irAEs (mild irAEs) had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than those with grade 3-5 irAEs (severe irAEs) or without irAEs on univariate (398 days versus 189 days, respectively; p = 0.0061) and multivariate (not reached versus 412 days, respectively; p = 0.021) analyses.

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC who experienced mild irAEs showed better response to treatment with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy than those with severe irAEs or without irAEs. Further large-scale research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Mutational Profile Evaluates Response and Survival to First-Line Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer

Evaluating the therapeutic response and survival of lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy has always been difficult. Limited biomarkers for evaluation exist and as a result histology represents an empiric tool to guide therapeutic decision making. In this study, molecular signatures associated with response and long-term survival of lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy are discovered. Whole-exome sequencing is performed on pretherapeutic tissue samples of 186 patients [145 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 41 small cell lung cancer (SCLC)]. On the basis of genomic alteration characteristics, NSCLC patients can be classified into four subtypes (C1-C4). The long-term survival is similar among different subtypes. SCLC patients are also divided into four subtypes and significant difference in their progression free survival is revealed (P < 0.001). NSCLC patients can be divided into three subtypes (S1-S3) based on TMB. A trend of worse survival associated with higher TMB in subtype S3 than in S1+S2 is found. In contrast, no significant correlations between molecular subtype and therapeutic response are observed. In conclusion, this study identifies several molecular signatures associated with response and survival to first-line chemotherapy in lung cancer.

Prognostic factors in older patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Over 40% Japanese patients with lung cancer are above 75 years of age. A specific strategy to treat such older patients is necessary because most trials exclude older patients with poor physical health. Herein, we aimed to identify predictive factors associated with overall survival (OS) in older patients by evaluating patient backgrounds and laboratory data before the start of treatment.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective medical chart review study was conducted at three Japanese institutions and involved patients aged 75 years and above with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of the patients, 75 had received best supportive care (BSC) and 49 mono-chemotherapy or platinum-doublet chemotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). OS after diagnosis was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard models, which included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), staging, serum albumin levels, and receipt of chemotherapy were analyzed.

Results

Age at diagnosis was not shown to be related to OS in patients receiving BSC. In patients aged 81 years and above, the chemotherapy group tended to have longer survival than did the BSC group, but there was no statistically significant difference in the median OS between the two groups due to the very small number of subjects (n: 30 vs. 12, median: 52 vs. 30 weeks, hazard ratio: 0.512, 95% confidence interval: 0.232–1.130, P=0.088). The patients’ performance status and albumin levels at lung cancer diagnosis had the highest impact on OS in the BSC group.

Conclusions

Careful consideration should be given to the indications of chemotherapy for patients aged 81 years and above with wild-type EGFR advanced non-small lung cancer.

Significance of inflammatory indexes in atezolizumab monotherapy outcomes in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Cancer immunotherapy, including atezolizumab monotherapy, is a promising alternative strategy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several inflammatory indices have been reported as potential biomarkers regarding the effectiveness of various treatments. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy using baseline inflammatory markers in NSCLC patients. We retrospectively enrolled 81 NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy at six different medical institutions in Japan. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of the clinical variables, including inflammatory indexes, on clinical outcomes. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 60 days and 252 days, respectively. The objective response rate was 7.4%, and the disease control rate was 54.3%. Patients with high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), low lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and/or high platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), at baseline, demonstrated substantially shorter PFS and OS compared to those with a low NLR, high LMR, and/or low PLR. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that a high baseline NLR was substantially associated with short PFS and short OS. Our retrospective observations suggest that inflammatory indices may be a potential negative prognostic factor of atezolizumab monotherapy outcomes in NSCLC patients.

Association of immune checkpoint inhibitors with respiratory infections: A review

Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown efficacy against a variety of cancer types. The use of anti PD-1, anti PD-L1, and anti CTLA-4 antibodies is rapidly expanding. The side effects of ICIs are very different from conventional cytocidal anticancer and molecular target drugs, and may extend to the digestive organs, respiratory organs, thyroid gland, pituitary gland, skin, and others. Although the details of these adverse events are becoming increasingly apparent, much is unknown regarding the effects and adverse events related to infections. This review focuses specifically on the impact of ICIs on respiratory infections. The impact of ICIs on pathogens varies depending on the significance of the role of T-cell immunity in the immune response to the specific pathogen, as well as the different modes of infection (i.e., acute or chronic), although the impact of ICIs on the clinical outcome of infections in humans has not yet been well studied. Enhanced clearance of many pathogens has been shown because immune checkpoint inhibition activates T cells. In contrast, reactivation of tuberculosis associated with ICI use has been reported, and therefore caution is warranted. In COVID-19 pneumonia, ICI administration may lead to exacerbation; however, it is also possible that ICI may be used for the treatment of COVID-19. It has also been shown that ICI has potential in the treatment of intractable filamentous fungal infections. Therefore, expanded clinical applications are expected.

Safety and tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in elderly and frail patients with advanced malignancies

The number of elderly patients with cancer has increased due to aging of the population. However, safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in elderly patients remains controversial, and limited information exists in frail patients. The present study retrospectively identified 197 patients treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab for unresectable advanced cancer between September 2014 and December 2018. Patients were divided into the elderly (age, ≥75 years) and non-elderly (age, <75 years) groups. The detailed immune-related adverse events (irAE) profile and development of critical complications were evaluated. To assess tolerability, the proportion of patients who continued PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for >6 months was analyzed. In the two groups, a three-element frailty score, including performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, was estimated, and patients were divided into the low-, intermediate- and high-frailty subgroups. Safety and tolerability were evaluated using the aforementioned items. A total of 58 patients (29.4%) were aged ≥75 years. No significant difference was found in the development of irAEs, hospitalization and treatment discontinuation due to irAEs between the two groups. However, the occurrence of unexpected critical complications was significantly higher in the elderly group (P=0.03). Among the elderly patients with high frailty, more critical complications and fatal irAE (hepatitis) were observed. In this population, 33.3% were able to continue treatment for >6 months without disease progression. The present analysis based on real world data showed similar safety and tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced malignancies. However, the impact of irAE in elderly patients, especially those with frailty, was occasionally greater compared with that in younger and fit patients.

Serum immune modulators during the first cycle of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Perforin as a biomarker

Background

Currently used biomarkers for immunotherapy are inadequate because they are only based on tumor properties. In view of microenvironment changes by tumors, host immunity should be considered, which may result in identifying more accurate and easily detectable biomarkers for daily clinical practice. Here, we assessed serum immune‐modulating factor levels for the response to anti‐PD‐1 antibodies during the first cycle in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Serum was collected from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab at several time points during the first cycle. We applied the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and multiplex assays to measure the levels of immune modulators.

Results

A total of 40 patients treated with nivolumab and 26 patients treated with pembrolizumab were studied. By ELISA, serum perforin, but not granzyme B, was measured in all samples. By multiplex assay, 10 immune modulators, including granzyme B, were measured in some, but not all, samples. Serum baseline perforin levels were strongly associated with increased progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Sequential changes in perforin levels during the first cycle were weakly associated with the clinical outcome.

Conclusions

Serum baseline perforin levels may be used to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy.

Key points

To identify a useful predictive marker for anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy, using blood samples might be helpful.

Serum baseline perforin levels were closely associated with prognosis with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in previously treated elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not clear whether its effectiveness and tolerability in elderly patients are equivalent to those in younger patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC who had previously received other treatments.

METHODS

We included 96 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced NSCLC treated with S-1 alone as a subsequent-line treatment at 12 medical facilities between January 2005 and March 2018 in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients, response to S-1 monotherapy, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated, retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 68 male and 28 female patients (median age, 78 [range: 75-86] years) were analyzed. In elderly patients who were treated with S-1 monotherapy as a subsequent-line treatment, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 8.3%, 43.8%, 3.4 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Observed AEs included anorexia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, reduced platelet count, and skin hyperpigmentation. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient because of pneumonitis. In patients who experienced no progressive disease, subsequent-line S-1 alone was associated with longer PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible as a subsequent-line treatment in elderly patients who were previously treated for NSCLC, and it produces results. S-1 monotherapy could be one of the treatment choices for elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Abstract 4306: Retrospective analysis of docetaxel in combination with ramucirumab for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Current clinical trials demonstrated that combination regimens comprising chemotherapy and immunotherapy lead to better patient outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone as the first line of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, the combination therapy of docetaxel (Doc) and ramucirumab (Ram) was considered one of the standard treatments for advanced or relapsed NSCLC patients. However, little is known about the therapeutic responders of this combination therapy among previously treated NSCLC patients. In the present study, we aimed to identify predictive factors for therapeutic response, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors, for Doc treatment in combination with Ram.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 135 advanced or relapsed NSCLC patients who were refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy at eleven institutions in Japan between July 2016 and November 2018.

RESULTS: Our observations showed that PD-L1 expression in tumors is not associated with the efficacy of combined therapy of Doc and Ram in previously treated NSCLC patients. Analysis of the patient clinical profiles indicated that prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a reliable predictor for the good progression-free survival (PFS) to this combination therapy (P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study indicated that combination regimens comprising chemotherapy and ICIs followed by Doc and Ram could be an optimal therapeutic option for NSCLC patients regardless of the PD-L1 status of tumors. Further investigations are required to strengthen clinical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the combination therapy of Doc plus Ram in previously treated NSCLC patients.

Citation Format: Rui Kitadai, Akihiro Yoshimura, Tadaaki Yamada, Yusuke Okuma, Takayuki Takeda, Takanori Kanematsu, Junji Uchino, Yasuhiko Nishioka, Koichi Takayama. Retrospective analysis of docetaxel in combination with ramucirumab for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4306.

Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Biweekly Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Versus Biweekly Gemcitabine and Carboplatin plus Maintenance Gemcitabine in Elderly Patients with Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: LOGIK0801

LESSONS LEARNED

The usefulness of maintenance gemcitabine (GEM) after biweekly carboplatin + GEM in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer could not be proved. Superior overall survival was obtained in the group that did not receive maintenance therapy.

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this randomized phase II study was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gemcitabine (GEM) maintenance therapy versus best supportive care following first-line GEM plus carboplatin (CBDCA).

METHODS

Elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to the control arm or the study arm. All patients received biweekly combination therapy with GEM and CBDCA (1,000 mg/m² GEM and CBDCA at an area under the curve [AUC] of 3 on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks). In the study arm, patients with objective response or stable disease following three or four cycles of initial chemotherapy received maintenance GEM.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 17.5% in the control arm and 14.0% in the study arm. The most common toxicity was neutropenia (control arm: 47.5% and study arm: 69.8%). The median progression-free survivals were 4.99 months (control arm) and 4.44 months (study arm), and the median overall survivals (OSs) were 21.7 months (control arm) and 8.2 months (study arm).

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support maintenance GEM after biweekly CBDCA+GEM in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Endocrinopathies Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Cancer Treatment: A Review

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown efficacy against a variety of cancer types. The effects of nivolumab and pembrolizumab on lung cancer have been reported, and further therapeutic advances are ongoing. The side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are very different from those of conventional cytocidal anticancer drugs and molecular targeted drugs, and they involve various organs such as the digestive and respiratory organs, thyroid and pituitary glands, and skin. The generic term for such adverse events is immune-related adverse events (irAEs). They are relatively infrequent, and, if mild, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be continued with careful control. However, early detection and appropriate treatment are critical, as moderate-to-severe irAEs are associated with markedly reduced organ function and quality of life, with fatal consequences in some cases. Of these, endocrinopathies caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors are sometimes difficult to distinguish from nonspecific symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and may have serious outcomes when the diagnosis is delayed. Therefore, it is necessary to anticipate and appropriately address the onset of endocrinopathies during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we present a review of endocrine disorders caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Final Results from a Phase II Trial of Osimertinib for Elderly Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor t790m-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Progressed during Previous Treatment

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used for treating EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and osimertinib is effective in cases that acquired T790M mutations after treatment with the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, no study has evaluated its safety and efficacy in older patients. This phase II trial (jRCTs071180002) evaluated osimertinib in T790M mutation-positive Japanese patients who were ≥75 years old and had experienced relapse or progression after previous EGFR-TKI treatment. Our previous report that enrolled 36 patients showed the overall response rate (58.3%) and disease control rate (97.2%), while this report describes the results for the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analyses. The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-17.5), and the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.0 months-not reached). The most frequent adverse events were anemia/hypoalbuminemia (27 patients, 75.0%), thrombocytopenia (21 patients, 58.3%), and paronychia/anorexia/diarrhea/neutropenia (15 patients, 41.7%). Pneumonitis was observed in four patients (11.1%), including two patients (5.6%) with Grade 3-4 pneumonitis. These results suggest that osimertinib was relatively safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer that acquired T790M mutations after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, even among patients who were ≥75 years old.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of durvalumab treatment in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy (SPIRAL-RT study)

Background:

In the PACIFIC study, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were prolonged by durvalumab as maintenance therapy after radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy using platinum-based antitumor agents. However, no data were obtained to reveal the efficacy of durvalumab after radiation monotherapy in patients unsuitable for chemoradiotherapy. Here, we describe an ongoing single-arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II trial of durvalumab in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy (SPIRAL-RT study).

Methods:

Durvalumab at 10 mg/kg body weight is administered every 2 weeks after radiation therapy until individual patients meet the discontinuation criteria. The treatment duration is up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints are response rate, PFS, OS, and safety. Durvalumab treatment after radiation monotherapy is expected to prolong 1-year PFS rate and have acceptable adverse events.

Discussion:

We are conducting an intervention study to investigate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab treatment in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Review

The treatment of lung cancer has changed drastically in recent years owing to the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A 1992 study reported that programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), an immune checkpoint molecule, is upregulated during the induction of T cell death. Since then, various immunoregulatory mechanisms involving PD-1 have been clarified, and the successful use of PD-1 blockers in anticancer therapy eventually led to the development of the current generation of ICIs. Nivolumab was the first ICI approved for treating lung cancer in 2014. Since then, various ICIs such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab have been successively introduced into clinical medicine and have shown remarkable efficacy. The introduction of ICIs constituted a major advancement in lung cancer treatment, but disease prognosis continues to remain low. Therefore, new molecular-targeted therapies coupled with existing anticancer drugs and radiotherapy have recently been explored. This review encompasses the current status, challenges, and future perspectives of ICI treatment in lung cancer.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of osimertinib as first-line treatment for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (SPIRAL-0 study)

Background

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has a potent inhibitory effect against both T790M resistance mutations and EGFR-TKI sensitizing in EGFR, with a relatively low affinity for wild-type EGFR. Osimertinib has been approved as a therapeutic agent for patients with T790M-mutation positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. As a first-line treatment, osimertinib may significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with the earlier generation first-line standard treatment. Osimertinib has been reported to provide survival benefits to EGFR mutation-positive patients. However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remains to be established.

Methods

In this single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, 40 subjects aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer will be recruited. Patients will be treated with osimertinib 80 mg/day until disease progresses or until the patient meets a discontinuation criterion. The primary endpoint is 1-year PFS. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Thirty-seven patients are required for the present study, as calculated based on normal approximation with a one-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected 1-year PFS is 70% and the 1-year PFS threshold is 50%.

Discussion

We are conducting an intervention study to investigate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib as a first-line treatment agent for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in patients aged ≥75 years.

Trial registration number

jRCTs071180007.

ONO-7475, a Novel AXL Inhibitor, Suppresses the Adaptive Resistance to Initial EGFR-TKI Treatment in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Currently, an optimal therapeutic strategy comprising molecularly targeted agents for treating EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib is not available. Therefore, the initial therapeutic intervention is crucial for the prolonged survival of these patients. The activation of anexelekto (AXL) signaling is known to be associated with intrinsic and acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). In this study, we investigated the best therapeutic strategy to combat AXL-induced tolerance to EGFR-TKIs using the novel AXL inhibitor ONO-7475.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We examined the efficacy of ONO-7475 in combination with EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC cells using in vitro and in vivo experiments. We investigated the correlation between AXL expression in tumors and clinical outcomes with osimertinib for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to initial EGFR-TKIs.

RESULTS

ONO-7475 sensitized AXL-overexpressing EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells to the EGFR-TKIs osimertinib and dacomitinib. In addition, ONO-7475 suppressed the emergence and maintenance of EGFR-TKI-tolerant cells. In the cell line-derived xenograft models of AXL-overexpressing EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with osimertinib, initial combination therapy of ONO-7475 and osimertinib markedly regressed tumors and delayed tumor regrowth compared with osimertinib alone or the combination after acquired resistance to osimertinib. AXL expression in EGFR-TKI refractory tumors did not correlate with the sensitivity of osimertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that ONO-7475 suppresses the emergence and maintenance of tolerant cells to the initial EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib or dacomitinib, in AXL-overexpressing EGFR-mutated NSCLC cells, suggesting that ONO-7475 and osimertinib is a highly potent combination for initial treatment.

The Quality of Life of Patients with Suspected Lung Cancer before and after Bronchoscopy and the Effect of Mirtazapine on the Depressive Status

Objective Patients with suspected lung cancer often experience adverse side effects such as anxiety, depression, and a decreased appetite. These side effects influence the patients' quality of life and their ability to make decisions concerning appropriate treatment. This study examined the psychological status and quality of life of patients with suspected lung cancer before and after bronchoscopy treatment and evaluated the effect of mirtazapine prescribed to patients with depression. Methods To assess patient characteristics (e.g. age, gender, and medical history), a questionnaire including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Japanese version and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-L was administered. Patients Forty-three patients admitted for bronchoscopy treatment between May 2017 and April 2018 were included. Results The results showed that patients with depression reported a worse quality of life than those without depression. Compared with no medication, the administration of mirtazapine alleviated depressive symptoms. Furthermore, the patients' depressive status was affected by their physical symptoms, including coughing, tightness of chest, and dyspnea. Conclusion Our results emphasize the importance of detecting depression in the early stages of a cancer diagnosis and have significant implications concerning pharmacological intervention in patients with cancer displaying signs of depression.

Retrospective Efficacy Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Little is known regarding the effectiveness and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge after disease progression following initial ICI treatments. To identify eligible patients for ICI rechallenge, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical profiles and the effect of ICI rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We enrolled 35 NSCLC patients at six different institutions who were retreated with ICIs after discontinued initial ICI treatments due to disease progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of clinical profiles on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS and OS were 81 d (95% confidence interval, CI, 41-112 d) and 225 d (95% CI 106-361 d), respectively. The objective response rate was 2.9%, and the disease control rate was 42.9%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (hazard ratio, HR, 2.38; 95% CI 1.03-5.52; p = 0.043) and body mass index (BMI) > 20 (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.95, p = 0.036) were significantly associated with PFS of ICI rechallenge. Our observations suggest that poor ECOG-PS and low BMI at intervention with ICI rechallenge may be negative predictors for ICI rechallenge treatment in patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab is an effective front-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients expressing high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, it is unclear whether first-line pembrolizumab has similar efficacy among elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) and younger patients. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in older adults with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients with advanced NSCLC expressing high PD-L1, including 47 older adults, received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy at ten institutions in Japan, between February 2017 and February 2018. Data related to patient characteristics, efficacy of pembrolizumab therapy, and the type and severity of adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 patients [40 men and 7 women; median age 79 (range 75-88) years] were included in our analysis. In patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, overall response, disease control rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 53.1%, 74.4%, 7.0 months, and not reached, respectively. Common adverse events included anorexia, fatigue, skin rash, and hypothyroidism. Two treatment-related deaths were noted, due to pneumonitis and infection. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved PFS in patients with non-progressive disease (PD). In patients with non-PD and good performance status (PS), pembrolizumab monotherapy improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1 tolerated front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy well. Their survival outcomes were equivalent to those of younger patients. In patients with non-PD, first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy may improve PFS; in conjunction with good PS, it additionally improves OS.

Phase I/II Study of Docetaxel and S-1 in Previously-Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: LOGIK0408

Background: As docetaxel plus S-1 may be feasible for cancer treatment, we conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the recommended docetaxel dose and the fixed S-1 dose (phase I), as well as confirm the regimen’s efficacy and safety (phase II) for previously-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients ≤75 years with performance status ≤1 and adequate organ function were treated at three-week intervals with docetaxel on day 1 and 80 mg/m² oral S-1 from days 1–14. The starting docetaxel dose was 45 mg/m² and this was escalated to a maximum of 70 mg/m². In phase II, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were assessed. Results: The recommended doses were 50 mg/m² docetaxel (day 1) and 80 mg/m² S-1 (days 1–14). Grades 3 and 4 leukocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 44% and 67% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Overall response to chemotherapy was 7.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6–20.9%), and median PFS and OS were 18.0 weeks (95% CI; 11.3–22.9 weeks) and 53.0 weeks, respectively. Conclusion: Fifty mg/m² docetaxel plus 80 mg/m² oral S-1 had a lower response rate than anticipated; however, the survival data were encouraging. A further investigation is warranted to select the optimal patient population.