1
|
Rattay T, Seibold P, Aguado-Barrera ME, Altabas M, Azria D, Barnett GC, Bultijnck R, Chang-Claude J, Choudhury A, Coles CE, Dunning AM, Elliott RM, Farcy Jacquet MP, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Johnson K, Müller A, Post G, Rancati T, Reyes V, Rosenstein BS, De Ruysscher D, de Santis MC, Sperk E, Stobart H, Symonds RP, Taboada-Valladares B, Vega A, Veldeman L, Webb AJ, West CM, Valdagni R, Talbot CJ. External Validation of a Predictive Model for Acute Skin Radiation Toxicity in the REQUITE Breast Cohort. Front Oncol 2020; 10:575909. [PMID: 33216838 PMCID: PMC7664984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.575909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute skin toxicity is a common and usually transient side-effect of breast radiotherapy although, if sufficiently severe, it can affect breast cosmesis, aftercare costs and the patient's quality-of-life. The aim of this study was to develop predictive models for acute skin toxicity using published risk factors and externally validate the models in patients recruited into the prospective multi-center REQUITE (validating pREdictive models and biomarkers of radiotherapy toxicity to reduce side-effects and improve QUalITy of lifE in cancer survivors) study. Methods: Patient and treatment-related risk factors significantly associated with acute breast radiation toxicity on multivariate analysis were identified in the literature. These predictors were used to develop risk models for acute erythema and acute desquamation (skin loss) in three Radiogenomics Consortium cohorts of patients treated by breast-conserving surgery and whole breast external beam radiotherapy (n = 2,031). The models were externally validated in the REQUITE breast cancer cohort (n = 2,057). Results: The final risk model for acute erythema included BMI, breast size, hypo-fractionation, boost, tamoxifen use and smoking status. This model was validated in REQUITE with moderate discrimination (AUC 0.65), calibration and agreement between predicted and observed toxicity (Brier score 0.17). The risk model for acute desquamation, excluding the predictor tamoxifen use, failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort. Conclusions: While most published prediction research in the field has focused on model development, this study reports successful external validation of a predictive model using clinical risk factors for acute erythema following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. This model retained discriminatory power but will benefit from further re-calibration. A similar model to predict acute desquamation failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort. Future improvements and more accurate predictions are expected through the addition of genetic markers and application of other modeling and machine learning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Rattay
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miguel E Aguado-Barrera
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Manuel Altabas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Azria
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditérranée, Département d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, ICM Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Gillian C Barnett
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca M Elliott
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy Jacquet
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditérranée, Département d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kerstie Johnson
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Anusha Müller
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Victoria Reyes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barry S Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- MAASTRO Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria C de Santis
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Sperk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hilary Stobart
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Paul Symonds
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Begoña Taboada-Valladares
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam J Webb
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Catharine M West
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Hematology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christopher J Talbot
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong G, Lam E, Karam I, Yee C, Drost L, Tam S, Lam H, McCarvell A, McKenzie E, Chow E. The impact of smoking on adjuvant breast cancer radiation treatment: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 24:100185. [PMID: 32593846 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of cigarette smoking on cancer risk has been well-studied. Similarly, exposure to ionizing radiation from radiotherapy (RT) can produce detrimental effects on an individual's health. In patients administered RT, there has been an observed relationship in other primary carcinomas. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the influence of cigarette smoking on outcomes post adjuvant RT in breast cancer patients. METHODS OVID Medline, Cochrane and Embase were searched and 1893 articles were identified. A total of 71 articles were included in the review. Study type, published year and sample size, age, systemic therapies, RT techniques and treatment side effects were collected if available. RESULTS The review found 198 different outcomes which fell into 7 categories and similar outcomes were recorded. 40% of skin reaction outcomes, 50% of cardiovascular outcomes, 71% of reconstruction outcomes, 29% of pulmonary function outcomes, 33% of mortality outcomes and 42% of secondary recurrence outcomes reported significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. None of the articles reported non-smokers to have a higher risk than smokers. CONCLUSION Cigarette smoking can pose a higher risk of post-treatment complications that can influence an individual's quality of life, survival rate and/or recurrence risk. This review further assessed the impact of smoking on various patient outcomes and side-effects in the adjuvant breast RT setting. The information provided in this review suggest that smoking cessation programs would help educate patients to understand their risks of being a current or former smoker when undergoing RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Wong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Lam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin Yee
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leah Drost
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Tam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry Lam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyson McCarvell
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin McKenzie
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerardina S, Edy I, Sonia S, Cristina DV, Carla Germana R, Diego G, Michele F, Lucio T, Maria DR, Sara R. A new three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique for large breast and/or high body mass index patients: evaluation of a novel fields assessment aimed to reduce extra-target-tissue irradiation. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160039. [PMID: 27355127 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an alternative three-dimensional treatment plan with standardized fields class solution for whole-breast radiotherapy in patients with large/pendulous breast and/or high body mass index (BMI). METHODS Two treatment plans [tangential fields and standardized five-fields technique (S5F)] for a total dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions were generated for patients with large breasts [planning target volume (PTV) >1000 cm(3) and/or BMI >25 kg m(-2)], supine positioned. S5F plans consist of two wedged tangential beams, anteroposterior: 20° for the right breast and 340° for the left breast, and posteroanterior: 181° for the right breast and 179° for the left breast. A field in field in medial-lateral beam and additional fields were added to reduce hot spot areas and extra-target-tissue irradiation and to improve dose distribution. The percentage of PTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (PTV V95%), percentage of PTV receiving 105% of the prescribed dose (PTV V105%), maximal dose to PTV (PTV Dmax), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index were recorded. V10%, V20%, V105% and V107% of a "proper" normal tissue structure (body-PTV healthy tissue) were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT v.12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). RESULTS In 38 patients included, S5F improved HI (8.4 vs 10.1; p ≤ 0.001) and significantly reduced PTV Dmax and PTV V105%. The extra-target-tissue irradiation was significantly reduced using S5F for V105% (cm(3)) and V107% (cm(3)) with a very high difference in tissue irradiation (46.6 vs 3.0 cm(3), p ≤ 0.001 for V105% and 12.2 vs 0.0 cm(3), p ≤ 0.001 for V107% for tangential field and S5F plans, respectively). Only a slight increase in low-dose extra-target-tissue irradiation (V10%) was observed (2.2719 vs 1.8261 cm(3), p = 0.002). CONCLUSION The S5F technique in patients with large breast or high BMI increases HI and decreases hot spots in extra-target-tissues and can therefore be easily implemented in breast cancer radiotherapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The treatment planning strategy proposed in this study has several advantages: (a) it is extremely reliable as the standard supine positioning is used; (b) the standardized class solution allows for widespread use;
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ippolito Edy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Silipigni Sonia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Gaudino Diego
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fiore Michele
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Trodella Lucio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ramella Sara
- Radiotherapy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Langhe S, Mulliez T, Veldeman L, Remouchamps V, van Greveling A, Gilsoul M, De Schepper E, De Ruyck K, De Neve W, Thierens H. Factors modifying the risk for developing acute skin toxicity after whole-breast intensity modulated radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:711. [PMID: 25252713 PMCID: PMC4192342 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background After breast-conserving radiation therapy most patients experience acute skin toxicity to some degree. This may impair patients’ quality of life, cause pain and discomfort. In this study, we investigated treatment and patient-related factors, including genetic polymorphisms, that can modify the risk for severe radiation-induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients. Methods We studied 377 patients treated at Ghent University Hospital and at ST.-Elisabeth Clinic and Maternity in Namur, with adjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Women were treated in a prone or supine position with normofractionated (25 × 2 Gy) or hypofractionated (15 × 2.67 Gy) IMRT alone or in combination with other adjuvant therapies. Patient- and treatment-related factors and genetic markers in regulatory regions of radioresponsive genes and in LIG3, MLH1 and XRCC3 genes were considered as variables. Acute dermatitis was scored using the CTCAEv3.0 scoring system. Desquamation was scored separately on a 3-point scale (0-none, 1-dry, 2-moist). Results Two-hundred and twenty patients (58%) developed G2+ dermatitis whereas moist desquamation occurred in 56 patients (15%). Normofractionation (both p < 0.001), high body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001), bra cup size ≥ D (p = 0.001 and p = 0.043) and concurrent hormone therapy (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037) were significantly associated with occurrence of acute dermatitis and moist desquamation, respectively. Additional factors associated with an increased risk of acute dermatitis were the genetic variation in MLH1 rs1800734 (p=0.008), smoking during RT (p = 0.010) and supine IMRT (p = 0.004). Patients receiving trastuzumab showed decreased risk of acute dermatitis (p < 0.001). Conclusions The normofractionation schedule, supine IMRT, concomitant hormone treatment and patient related factors (high BMI, large breast, smoking during treatment and the genetic variation in MLH1 rs1800734) were associated with increased acute skin toxicity in patients receiving radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Trastuzumab seemed to be protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hubert Thierens
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Killander F, Anderson H, Kjellén E, Malmström P. Increased cardio and cerebrovascular mortality in breast cancer patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy--25 year follow-up of a randomised trial from the South Sweden Breast Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2201-10. [PMID: 24951164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2013] [Revised: 03/27/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To analyse late morbidity and mortality in pre and post-menopausal breast cancer patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy, with emphasis on side-effects from the heart, cerebrovascular and respiratory systems. METHODS Long term follow-up of two randomised, clinical trials with 1100 patients was carried out. Pre-menopausal women were allocated to radiotherapy (RT), RT+oral cyclophosphamide (RT+C) or cyclophosphamide only (C). Post-menopausal women were allocated to RT, RT+Tamoxifen for one year (RT+Tam) or tamoxifen only (Tam). Information on admission to hospital, mortality and causes of death was obtained from national registers. RESULTS After 25 years, adding RT to cyclophosphamide in pre-menopausal women raised the mortality from heart disease from zero to 0.8% (p=0.04). In post-menopausal women, adding RT to Tam raised the mortality from heart disease from 10.5% to 18.4% (p=0.005). In post-menopausal women mortality due to cerebrovascular disease increased from 3.4% to 8.7% by adding RT to Tam (p=0.015). The differences were not evident until in the second decade of follow-up. In spite of differences in specific causes of death, there were no significant differences between the treatment arms concerning morbidity or overall mortality. CONCLUSION Postmastectomy radiotherapy to the chest wall and loco-regional lymph nodes including the parasternal lymph nodes as delivered in the end of the seventies did not reduce overall mortality, but gave a significantly increased risk of death from heart and cerebrovascular disease, which appeared during the second decade after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrika Killander
- Skåne Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Harald Anderson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Skåne Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Malmström
- Skåne Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wondergem J, Boerma M, Kodama K, Stewart FA, Trott KR. Cardiovascular effects after low-dose exposure and radiotherapy: what research is needed? RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2013; 52:425-434. [PMID: 23999657 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0489-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The authors of this report met at the Head Quarter of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, Austria, on 2-4 July 2012, for intensive discussions of an abundance of original publications on new epidemiological studies on cardiovascular effects after low-dose exposure and radiotherapy and radiobiological experiments as well as several comprehensive reviews that were published since the previous meeting by experts sponsored by the IAEA in June 2006. The data necessitated a re-evaluation of the situation with special emphasis on the consequences current experimental and clinical data may have for clinical oncology/radiotherapy and radiobiological research. The authors jointly arrived at the conclusions and recommendations presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Wondergem
- Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagrammer Strasse 5, PO box 100, 1400, Vienna, Austria,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Talbot CJ, Tanteles GA, Barnett GC, Burnet NG, Chang-Claude J, Coles CE, Davidson S, Dunning AM, Mills J, Murray RJS, Popanda O, Seibold P, West CML, Yarnold JR, Symonds RP. A replicated association between polymorphisms near TNFα and risk for adverse reactions to radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:748-53. [PMID: 22767148 PMCID: PMC3419947 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Response to radiotherapy varies between individuals both in terms of efficacy and adverse reactions. Finding genetic determinants of radiation response would allow the tailoring of the treatment, either by altering the radiation dose or by surgery. Despite a growing number of studies in radiogenomics, there are no well-replicated genetic association results. METHODS We carried out a candidate gene association study and replicated the result using three additional large cohorts, a total of 2036 women scored for adverse reactions to radiotherapy for breast cancer. RESULTS Genetic variation near the tumour necrosis factor alpha gene is shown to affect several clinical endpoints including breast induration, telangiectasia and overall toxicity. In the combined analysis homozygosity for the rare allele increases overall toxicity (P=0.001) and chance of being in the upper quartile of risk with odds ratio of 2.46 (95% confidence interval 1.52-3.98). CONCLUSION We have identified that alleles of the class III major histocompatibility complex region associate with overall radiotherapy toxicity in breast cancer patients by using internal replication through a staged design. This is the first well-replicated report of a genetic predictor for radiotherapy reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Talbot
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Adrian Building, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Variation in telangiectasia predisposing genes is associated with overall radiation toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84:1031-6. [PMID: 22677372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2011] [Revised: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 02/09/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients receiving radiotherapy for breast cancer where the heart is within the radiation field, cutaneous telangiectasiae could be a marker of potential radiation-induced heart disease. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes known to cause heritable telangiectasia-associated disorders could predispose to such late, normal tissue vascular damage. METHODS AND MATERIALS The relationship between cutaneous telangiectasia as a late normal tissue radiation injury phenotype in 633 breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy was examined. Patients were clinically assessed for the presence of cutaneous telangiectasia and genotyped at nine SNPs in three candidate genes. Candidate SNPs were within the endoglin (ENG) and activin A receptor, type II-like 1 (ACVRL1) genes, mutations in which cause hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene associated with ataxia-telangiectasia. RESULTS A total of 121 (19.1%) patients exhibited a degree of cutaneous telangiectasiae on clinical examination. Regression was used to examine the associations between the presence of telangiectasiae in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, controlling for the effects of boost and known brassiere size (n=388), and individual geno- or haplotypes. Inheritance of ACVRL1 SNPs marginally contributed to the risk of cutaneous telangiectasiae. Haplotypic analysis revealed a stronger association between inheritance of a ATM haplotype and the presence of cutaneous telangiectasiae, fibrosis and overall toxicity. No significant association was observed between telangiectasiae and the coinheritance of the candidate ENG SNPs. CONCLUSIONS Genetic variation in the ATM gene influences reaction to radiotherapy through both vascular damage and increased fibrosis. The predisposing variation in the ATM gene will need to be better defined to optimize it as a predictive marker for assessing radiotherapy late effects.
Collapse
|
9
|
Barnett GC, West CML, Coles CE, Pharoah PDP, Talbot CJ, Elliott RM, Tanteles GA, Symonds RP, Wilkinson JS, Dunning AM, Burnet NG, Bentzen SM. Standardized Total Average Toxicity score: a scale- and grade-independent measure of late radiotherapy toxicity to facilitate pooling of data from different studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82:1065-74. [PMID: 21605943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2010] [Revised: 03/15/2011] [Accepted: 03/18/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The search for clinical and biologic biomarkers associated with late radiotherapy toxicity is hindered by the use of multiple and different endpoints from a variety of scoring systems, hampering comparisons across studies and pooling of data. We propose a novel metric, the Standardized Total Average Toxicity (STAT) score, to try to overcome these difficulties. METHODS AND MATERIALS STAT scores were derived for 1010 patients from the Cambridge breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy trial and 493 women from the University Hospitals of Leicester. The sensitivity of the STAT score to detect differences between patient groups, stratified by factors known to influence late toxicity, was compared with that of individual endpoints. Analysis of residuals was used to quantify the effect of these covariates. RESULTS In the Cambridge cohort, STAT scores detected differences (p < 0.00005) between patients attributable to breast volume, surgical specimen weight, dosimetry, acute toxicity, radiation boost to tumor bed, postoperative infection, and smoking (p < 0.0002), with no loss of sensitivity over individual toxicity endpoints. Diabetes (p = 0.017), poor postoperative surgical cosmesis (p = 0.0036), use of chemotherapy (p = 0.0054), and increasing age (p = 0.041) were also associated with increased STAT score. When the Cambridge and Leicester datasets were combined, STAT was associated with smoking status (p < 0.00005), diabetes (p = 0.041), chemotherapy (p = 0.0008), and radiotherapy boost (p = 0.0001). STAT was independent of the toxicity scale used and was able to deal with missing data. There were correlations between residuals of the STAT score obtained using different toxicity scales (r > 0.86, p < 0.00005 for both datasets). CONCLUSIONS The STAT score may be used to facilitate the analysis of overall late radiation toxicity, from multiple trials or centers, in studies of possible genetic and nongenetic determinants of radiotherapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian C Barnett
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Oncology Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Genetic variants in TGFβ-1 and PAI-1 as possible risk factors for cardiovascular disease after radiotherapy for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102:115-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2010] [Revised: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/20/2011] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
11
|
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene LIG3 and acute adverse skin reactions following radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99:231-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2010] [Revised: 05/03/2011] [Accepted: 05/03/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|