Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade on proximal fluid uptake in the rat kidney

Regulation of renal proximal fluid uptake by luminal and peritubular angiotensin II

Introduction

Angiotensin II (Ang II), when administered to either tubular lumen or peritubular capillary, exerts a biphasic action on proximal fluid uptake rate. At low concentrations, (10-12—10-10M) Ang II stimulates fluid transport, whereas higher doses (> 10-9 M) inhibit. Ang II is secreted into the lumen in the proximal tubule and the concentration of Ang II in the proximal lumen has been reported to be in the nanomolar range, 100—1,000 times higher than in peritubular blood. We investigated the regulation of renal proximal fluid transport by luminal (predominantly locally produced) and peritubular capillary (circulatory) Ang II in anaesthetised rats, using a selective AT1-receptor antagonist, candesartan.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models of vascular, cardiac, metabolic and renal disease

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

Angiotensin II-induced hypertensive renal inflammation is mediated through HMGB1-TLR4 signaling in rat tubulo-epithelial cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Angiotensin II is a vaso-constrictive peptide that regulates blood pressure homeostasis. Even though the inflammatory effects of AngII in renal pathophysiology have been studied, there still exists a paucity of data with regard to the mechanism of action of AngII-mediated kidney injury. The objective of this study was to elucidate the mechanistic role of HMGB1-TLR4 signaling in AngII-induced inflammation in the kidney.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Rat tubular epithelial cells (NRK52E) were treated with AngII over a preset time-course. In another set of experiments, HMGB1 was neutralized and TLR4 was knocked down using small interfering RNA targeting TLR4. Cell extracts were subjected to RT-PCR, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and ELISA.

KEY RESULTS

AngII-induced inflammation in NRK52E cells increased gene and protein expression of TLR4, HMGB1 and key proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα and IL1β). Pretreatment with Losartan (an AT1 receptor blocker) attenuated the AngII-induced expression of TLR4 and inflammatory cytokines. TLR4 silencing was used to elucidate the specific role played by TLR4 in AngII-induced inflammation. TLR4siRNA treatment in these cells significantly decreased the AngII-induced inflammatory effect. Consistent observations were made when the Ang II treated cells were pretreated with anti-HMGB1. Downstream activation of NFκB and rate of generation of ROS was also decreased on gene silencing of TLR4 and exposure to anti-HMGB1.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These results indicate a key role for HMGB1-TLR4 signaling in AngII-mediated inflammation in the renal epithelial cells. Our data also reveal that AngII-induced effects could be alleviated by HMGB1-TLR4 inhibition, suggesting this pathway as a potential therapeutic target for hypertensive renal dysfunctions.

Angiotensin II mediates downregulation of aquaporin water channels and key renal sodium transporters in response to urinary tract obstruction

The renin-angiotensin system is well known to be involved in the pathophysiological changes in renal function after obstruction of the ureter. Previously, we demonstrated that bilateral ureteral obstruction (BUO) is associated with dramatic changes in the expression of both renal sodium transporters and aquaporin water channels (AQPs). We now examined the effects of the AT1-receptor antagonist candesartan on the dysregulation of AQPs and key renal sodium transporters in rats subjected to 24-h BUO and followed 2 days after release of BUO (BUO-2R). Consistent with previous observations, BUO-2R resulted in a significantly decreased expression of AQP1, -2, and -3 compared with control rats. Concomitantly, the rats developed polyuria and reduced urine osmolality. Moreover, expression of the type 2 Na-phosphate cotransporter (NaPi-2) and type 1 bumetanide-sensitive Na-K-2Cl cotransporter (NKCC2) was markedly reduced, consistent with postobstructive natriuresis. Candesartan treatment from the onset of obstruction attenuated the reduction in GFR (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.3 ml·min−1·kg−1) and partially prevented the reduction in the expression of AQP2 (66 ± 21 vs. 13 ± 2%, n = 7; P < 0.05), NaPi-2 (84 ± 6 vs. 57 ± 10%, n = 7; P < 0.05), and NKCC2 (89 ± 12 vs. 46% ± 11, n = 7; P < 0.05). Consistent with this, candesartan treatment attenuated the increase in urine output (58 ± 4 vs. 97 ± 5 μl·min−1·kg−1, n = 7; P < 0.01) and the reduction in sodium reabsorption (433 ± 62 vs. 233 ± 45 μmol·min−1·kg−1, n = 7; P < 0.05) normally found in rats subjected to BUO. Moreover, candesartan treatment attenuated induction of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) expression in the inner medulla, suggesting that COX-2 induction in response to obstruction is regulated by ANG II. In conclusion, candesartan prevents dysregulation of AQP2, sodium transporters, and development of polyuria seen in BUO. This strongly supports the view that candesartan protects kidney function in response to urinary tract obstruction.

Acute effects of candesartan on rat renal haemodynamics and proximal tubular reabsorption

1. The effects of the specific angiotensin II receptor type I (AT1) antagonist candesartan on renal proximal tubular sodium transport were studied using lithium clearance. The effects of candesartan on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and sodium and potassium excretion were also investigated. 2. Male Wistar rats were anaesthetized with Inactin (thiobutabarbital sodium; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Clearance markers (8% polyfructosan, 1% para-aminohippuric acid and 4 mmol/l lithium chloride) were given into a jugular vein at the rate of 1.6 mL/h per 100 g bodyweight. Candesartan was given as bolus injection (0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) followed by 60 min continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/min per kg, respectively. 3. The non-depressor dose of candesartan (0.01 mg/kg) did not alter RPF or GFR, whereas diuresis, natriuresis and kaliuresis were observed. The higher doses of candesartan reduced MABP, RPF and GFR, although diuresis, natriuresis and kaliuresis were still observed. 4. Renal tubular sodium and water reabsorption were inhibited after intravenous administration of candesartan independently of an alteration in arterial pressure. Lithium clearance data indicate that the site of inhibition was in the proximal nephron segment.

Sodium-potassium-adenosinetriphosphatase-dependent sodium transport in the kidney: hormonal control

Tubular reabsorption of filtered sodium is quantitatively the main contribution of kidneys to salt and water homeostasis. The transcellular reabsorption of sodium proceeds by a two-step mechanism: Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase-energized basolateral active extrusion of sodium permits passive apical entry through various sodium transport systems. In the past 15 years, most of the renal sodium transport systems (Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, channels, cotransporters, and exchangers) have been characterized at a molecular level. Coupled to the methods developed during the 1965-1985 decades to circumvent kidney heterogeneity and analyze sodium transport at the level of single nephron segments, cloning of the transporters allowed us to move our understanding of hormone regulation of sodium transport from a cellular to a molecular level. The main purpose of this review is to analyze how molecular events at the transporter level account for the physiological changes in tubular handling of sodium promoted by hormones. In recent years, it also became obvious that intracellular signaling pathways interacted with each other, leading to synergisms or antagonisms. A second aim of this review is therefore to analyze the integrated network of signaling pathways underlying hormone action. Given the central role of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in sodium reabsorption, the first part of this review focuses on its structural and functional properties, with a special mention of the specificity of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase expressed in renal tubule. In a second part, the general mechanisms of hormone signaling are briefly introduced before a more detailed discussion of the nephron segment-specific expression of hormone receptors and signaling pathways. The three following parts integrate the molecular and physiological aspects of the hormonal regulation of sodium transport processes in three nephron segments: the proximal tubule, the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop, and the collecting duct.