Accurate quantitation of residual tumor burden at bone marrow harvest predicts timing of subsequent relapse in patients with common ALL treated by autologous bone marrow transplantation. Nagoya BMT Group

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of minimal residual disease at the time of transplantation in acute leukemia

Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in acute leukemia, even in patients transplanted in morphologic CR. Various techniques now enable the sensitive quantification of 'minimal' amounts of residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute leukemia in remission. Numerous studies convincingly demonstrate that MRD at the time of transplantation is a powerful, independent predictor of subsequent relapse, with current detection levels of one leukemic cell in 10(5)-10(6) normal cells being prognostically relevant. This recognition provides the rationale to assign patients with detectable MRD (that is, 'MRD(+)' patients) to intensified therapies before, during, or after transplantation, although data supporting these strategies are still sparse. Limited evidence from observational studies suggests that outcomes with autologous HCT are so poor that MRD(+) patients should preferentially be assigned to allogeneic HCT, which can cure a subgroup of these patients, particularly if unmanipulated (T-cell replete) grafts and/or minimized immunosuppression are used to optimize the graft-vs-leukemia effect. Emerging data suggest that additional therapy with non-cross-resistant agents to decrease residual tumor burden before transplantation in MRD(+) patients might be beneficial. Further, other studies hint at immunotherapy (for example, rapid withdrawal of immunosuppression and/or donor lymphocyte infusions) as a means to prevent overt relapse if patients remain, or become, MRD(+) after HCT. Ultimately, controlled clinical studies are needed to define the value of MRD-directed therapies, and patients should be encouraged to enter such trials.

WT1 mRNA level in peripheral blood is a sensitive biomarker for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

The Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) encodes a transcription factor that is involved in normal cellular development and cell survival. WT1 mRNA is overexpressed in the minimal residual disease (MRD) of patients with hematopoietic malignancy patients, particularly acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD represents the condition with the low levels of leukemia cells in the bone marrow and is known as a sign of recurrence. In hematopoietic malignancies, definition of remission is based on the lack of MRD at submicroscopic level. Between December 2005 and June 2008, we started to measure WT1 mRNA levels in the peripheral blood (PB) from patients by quantitative real-time PCR in Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital. Three hundreds and eight samples from 95 patients were evaluated. The patients included AML (55 patients), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11), myelodysplastic syndrome (20), malignant lymphoma (5), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), prostatic carcinoma (1), and leukopenia (2). Among the 55 AML patients, 21 patients were pretreated with remission induction therapy. In the clinical course of 21 patients, timely therapeutic approaches could be started for relapse by the early detection of WT1 mRNA overexpression before the morphological findings were apparent. Monitoring WT1 mRNA is helpful to identify patients at high-risk relapse. High overall survival rate (71.2%, 15/21, median: 24.6 months, range 1.1-35.6 months) was achieved in 3 years. The overall survival rate of 34 post-treatment patients was 61.7% (median: 23.5 months, range 0.13-126.5 months after treatment start). In conclusion, the WT1 mRNA level is a sensitive biomarker for monitoring MRD.

Minimal residual disease is a significant predictor of treatment failure in non T-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: final results of the international trial UKALL XII/ECOG2993

The predictive value of molecular minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring using polymerase chain reaction amplification of clone-specific immunoglobulin or T-cell Receptor rearrangements was analysed in 161 patients with non T-lineage Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) participating in the UK arm of the international ALL trial UKALL XII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993. MRD positivity (> or =10(-4)) in patients treated with chemotherapy alone was associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) at several time-points during the first year of therapy. MRD status best discriminated outcome after phase 2 induction, when the relative risk of relapse was 8.95 (2.85-28.09)-fold higher in MRD-positive (> or =10(-4)) patients and the 5-year RFS 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-40%] compared to 71% (56-85%) in MRD-negative (<10(-4)) patients (P = 0.0002) When MRD was detected prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), a significantly higher rate of treatment failure was observed [5-year RFS 25% (CI 0-55%) vs. 77% (95% CI 54-100%) in MRD-negative/<10(-4), P = 0.01] whereas in recipients of allogeneic-SCT in first complete remission, MRD positivity pre-transplant did not adversely affect outcome. These data provide a rationale for introducing MRD-based risk stratification in future studies for the delineation of those at significant risk of treatment failure in whom intensification of therapy should be evaluated.

Quantitative assessment of WT1 gene expression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

WT1 overexpression is described in several oncological diseases including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Quantification of WT1 in bone marrow samples may be useful as a marker of minimal residual disease (MRD) and may predict the relapse of AML after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The quantitative expression of WT1 was measured in 38 AML patients (16 males and 22 females) at diagnosis, at the time of transplant and after the allogeneic HSCT (at precise time points). All cases showed high WT1 expression levels at diagnosis with a mean of 4189 (SD 3325) and a median of 3495 (range 454-13923) copies WT1/10(4)Abl. At transplant, 25 patients (66%) were in complete cytologic remission (CcR) and 13 (34%) had refractory or relapsed AML. Bone marrow samples from patients transplanted in CcR showed significantly lower WT1 expression levels during HSCT compared with the samples from patients with a relapsed or refractory AML (P = 0.004). After HSCT, a rapid decline in WT1 expression levels was observed in all patients who attained or maintained a condition of CcR. Six of 38 patients (13%) relapsed after HSCT and all of them had an increase in WT1 expression at/or before relapse. Five of these six patients died of leukemia and one was successfully reinduced with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) + chemotherapy with a rapid reduction of WT1 levels. Besides, we found a complete concordance between WT1 expression levels and other disease markers (when available).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, there was a complete concordance between WT1 expression levels (measured by quantitative RT-PCR at precise time points) and status of AML before and after allogeneic HSCT. WT1 may be useful as a non-specific leukemia marker for monitoring MRD and as a predictor of AML clinical relapse. Based on these results, cases with increase of WT1 levels after HSCT and without graft vs. host disease may be candidate to discontinuation of immunosuppression and/or DLI therapy.

Autologous stem cell transplant in ALL: who should we be transplanting in first remission?

Long-term disease-free survival (DFS) has been reported after autologous stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Phase II studies have evaluated its role in first and subsequent complete remission (CR) with DFS rates of up to 50%. It has been under-utilized in 1st CR in part, due to a concern that patients who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have fewer options for salvage treatment of relapsed disease. Unfortunately, survival rates of <5% are reported in patients who relapse, regardless of initial therapy. Few prospective, randomized trials have analyzed large enough numbers of patients to allow us to determine the appropriate patient population for autologous transplantation. Although variability in the available studies makes it difficult to draw a definite conclusion, and many issues remain unresolved, available data suggests that there may be a group of patients for whom ASCT in first remission is a reasonable and perhaps superior treatment choice. Factors such as risk features at diagnosis, and minimal residual disease following induction therapy greatly affect outcome following ASCT. The available data as well as the questions that remain to be answered will be discussed and reviewed.

Elevated levels of WT1 transcripts in bone marrow harvests are associated with a high relapse risk in patients autografted for acute myeloid leukaemia

Relapse postautograft in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), may in part arise from leukaemia cells present in the bone marrow (BM) inoculum, and the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) in BM harvests used for autografting may therefore be clinically important. We have used the WT1 transcript as a marker of MRD, which was quantitated by RQ-PCR, in the BM harvests of 24 patients receiving an ABMT for AML. ABL was used as a control gene with WT1 level being normalised to 10(5) copies of ABL per sample. Median WT1 level was 651 copies (range=113-32 700) for the 13 patients with relapse-free survival (RFS) of less than 5 years, and 174 (range=0-1900) for patients with RFS of over 5 years postautograft (P<0.04). The RFS was 10.5 months for patients with WT1 level of >2000 copies (n=5), and has not yet been reached for patients with WT1 level<2000 (n=21), at a median follow-up of 92 months (P<0.05). We show that elevated levels of MRD in BM harvests are associated with a higher relapse risk in patients autografted for AML.

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in adults is a relatively rare neoplasm with a curability rate around 30% at 5 years. This consideration makes it imperative to dissect further the biological mechanisms of disease, in order to selectively implement an hitherto unsatisfactory success rate. The recognition of discrete ALL subtypes (some of which deserve specific therapeutic approaches, like T-lineage ALL (T-ALL) and mature B-lineage ALL (B-ALL)) is possible through an accurate combination of cytomorphology, immunophenotytpe and cytogenetic assays and has been a major result of clinical research studies conducted over the past 20 years. Two-three major prognostic groups are now easily identifiable, with a survival probability ranging from <10 to 20% (Philadelphia-positive ALL) to about 50-60% (low-risk T-ALL and selected patients with B-lineage ALL). These issues are extensively reviewed and form the basis of current knowledge. The second major point relates to the emerging importance of studies that reveal a dysregulated gene activity and its clinical counterpart. It is now clear that prognostication is a complex matter ranging from patient-related issues to cytogenetics to molecular biology, including the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) and possibly gene array tests. On these bases, the role of a correct, highly personalised therapeutic choice will soon become fundamental. Therapeutic progress may be obtainable through a careful integration of chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and the new targeted treatments with highly specific metabolic inhibitors and humanised monoclonal antibodies.

Recent approaches in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

In the last decades outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved considerably. In large multicenter studies remission rates range from 75% to 89%, and long-term leukemia-free survival (LFS) from 28% to 39%. Major progress has also been made regarding better characterization of subtypes of ALL. Complete diagnostic procedures are essential to identify these subtypes which have significant differences in clinical and laboratory features and prognosis. LFS of > 50% can be expected in favorable subtypes such as T-ALL or mature B-ALL, while LFS of < 20% is expected in Ph/BCR-ABL positive ALL. Prognostic factors can be used for risk stratification and selection of treatment strategies can be adapted to the subtype and relapse risk. This includes measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) to evaluate individualized treatment strategies adapted to the molecular response. Several new approaches for improvement in chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (SCT) are under investigation. They include the use of intensified anthracyclines, asparaginase, cyclophosphamide or high-dose cytarabine during induction and intensive rotational chemotherapy during consolidation. Also SCT - mainly from sibling donors - is now part of standard treatment of de novo ALL, although it remains open whether indications should be based on prognostic factors or whether SCT should be offered to all patients with sibling donor. However, substantial progress can only be achieved by new, experimental strategies. These include new approaches for SCT, such as nonmyeloablative SCT, measurement of MRD, causal treatment with molecular targeting, e.g. with kinase inhibitors, and antibody therapy.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in acute lymphocytic leukemia

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as well as allogeneic stem cell transplantation and conventional chemotherapy (CT) are less effective at treating acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) than acute myelocytic leukemia (AML). Chemoresistance and late relapses are hallmarks of ALL. In this context, the question of whether ASCT is superior to CT remains unanswered. In vitro marrow purging using monoclonal antibodies is not routinely used. This review summarizes the results of ASCT for adult and childhood ALL. Statistics from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation reveal a transplant-related mortality at 5 years of 11% +/- 1%, a relapse incidence of 60% +/- 2%, and a leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) of 36% +/- 2% and 42% +/- 2%, respectively in 1,366 adults autografted in first remission (CR1). In 269 children, the LFS and OS were 50% +/- 3% and 54% +/- 3%, respectively. There was no evidence in favor of purging the autograft in vitro. In contrast, multicentric and single-institution studies have found better results in adults autografted in CR1, with LFS at 5 years from 46% to 64%, possible efficacy of marrow in vitro purging with mafosfamide (LFS 52%), and improvement in outcome with additional measures post-ASCT, such as maintenance chemotherapy (LFS 57%). Further, as already observed for AML, analyses by risk groups suggest that ASCT may essentially benefit good- but not poor-risk patients. For patients with the Ph1/bcr-abl translocation, the role of STI571 anti-tyrosine kinase for in vivo purging before stem cell harvesting is being investigated.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for acute lymphocytic leukemia in adults

Autologous bone marrow transplantation remains an investigational treatment for adult ALL. Despite many anecdotal studies showing efficacy, the rarity of ALL has prevented the large randomized trials necessary to confirm effectiveness. Candidates for autoBMT include adult patients in first CR with adverse risk factors and all patients who have experienced disease relapse. It remains debatable which preparative regimen is optimal, whether purging is necessary, or if chemotherapy or immunotherapy administered after transplantation can decrease disease relapse. Overall, every effort should be made to enter ALL patients on well-designed randomized multi-institutional trials. These trials should compare autologous transplantation to newer more intensive chemotherapy regimens and should take into account the heterogeneity of ALL. A quality of life analysis should be performed as one high-dose treatment may be less toxic and better tolerated than multiple cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. Strategies aimed at enhancing an autologous graft-versus-leukemia effect after transplantation may enhance long-term survival. Many more studies are needed to further define the optimal role of autoBMT in adult ALL.

Purified autologous grafting in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission: evidence for long-term clinical and molecular remissions

Autologous transplantation is a treatment option for relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission (CR2) when a suitable donor is not available. In an attempt to prevent relapses originating from graft leukemic contamination, the experimental protocol of in vitro purification of leukapheretic products with monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), previously reported for adults, was adopted in 11 of 12 consecutive patients (median age, 9 years) with B cell precursor ALL in CR2 after late relapse (median, 37; range, 31-51 months after the onset) enrolled between July 1997 and July 1999 at a single pediatric center. At a median of 12 days after the mobilizing chemotherapy followed by G-CSF, a median of 13.9 (range, 5.9-18.7) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected from each patient and a median of 7.5 (range, 4.1-12.6) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg underwent the purification procedure. The first step of immunorosetting allowed a one-log reduction of the total cell count, by eliminating more than 90% of the CD11b+ cells; the second step, performed after incubation with anti-CD19 MoAbs, allowed the depletion of 99% (range, 93-100) of the CD19+ cells, kept within the magnetic field of the immunodepletion column, with a median recovery of 73% (range, 55-87) of the collected CD34+ cells. Molecular analysis assessed the in vitro eradication of detectable leukemic cells. A median reinfusion of 5.2 (range, 3.2-9.1) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg for each patient (median viability, 90%), after conditioning with the 'TBI-VP16-CY' regimen, allowed prompt engraftment and immunological reconstitution; no patients experienced severe transplant-related toxicity or major infections. One patient relapsed 7 months after transplantation, while 10 patients are alive in clinical and molecular remission, at a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 15-40) (2-year EFS, 89%, s.e. 9). In conclusion, the procedure proved to be reproducible for pediatric purified autografting, highly efficient concerning stem cell recovery and depletion of leukemia-lineage specific cells, and promising in terms of final outcome.