Cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel as initial or salvage regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells

An EGFR-ERK-SOX9 signaling cascade links urothelial development and regeneration to cancer

Like many carcinomas, urothelial carcinoma (UroCa) is associated with chronic injury. A better understanding of this association could inform improved strategies for preventing and treating this disease. We investigated the expression, regulation, and function of the transcriptional regulator SRY-related high-mobility group box 9 (Sox9) in urothelial development, injury repair, and cancer. In mouse bladders, Sox9 levels were high during periods of prenatal urothelial development and diminished with maturation after birth. In adult urothelial cells, Sox9 was quiescent but was rapidly induced by a variety of injuries, including exposure to the carcinogen cyclophosphamide, culture with hydrogen peroxide, and osmotic stress. Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) was required for Sox9 induction in urothelial injury and resulted from activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) by several Egfr ligands that were dramatically induced by injury. In UroCa cell lines, SOX9 expression was constitutively upregulated and could be suppressed by EGFR or ERK1/2 blockade. Gene knockdown showed a role for SOX9 in cell migration and invasion. Accordingly, SOX9 protein levels were preferentially induced in invasive human UroCa tissue samples (n = 84) compared with noninvasive cancers (n = 56) or benign adjacent urothelium (n = 49). These results identify a novel, potentially oncogenic signaling axis linking urothelial injury to UroCa. Inhibiting this axis is feasible through a variety of pharmacologic approaches and may have clinical utility.

Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Given the potential to limit cost, we conducted a pilot study evaluating delayed, low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy for the procurement of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autologous transplantation and reviewed the relevant literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with various malignancies received cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m(2) and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF 300 microg/d or 480 microg/d starting day +5 until two to four daily large volume leukapheresis yielded > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells. We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases from 1990 to the present to identify papers on PBPC procurement using delayed G-CSF (starting day +4 or later) following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

G-CSF was administered for a median of 9 days at an average cost of 1260 USD per 70-kg patient. Collection was initiated at a median of 12 days after chemotherapy. A median 2.5 (range 2-4) apheresis were performed yielding an average daily CD34+ collection of 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.35-56.7). After one apheresis, 82% and 57% of patients collected > or =2.5 x 10(6)/kg and > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Ultimately, 89% collected > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg. Febrile neutropenia and catheter-related infection developed in five and two patients, respectively. All patients proceeded to transplantation and engrafted successfully with a median of 14.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.05-113) cells infused. Eleven published reports were identified involving 590 patients of whom 498 received G-CSF at a dose range of 250 microg/d to 10 microg/kg/d starting day +4 to 15 for a period of 4 to 9 days for PBPC procurement. Among these reports, 62 to 100% and 33 to 96% of patients collected > or =2 to 2.5 x 10(6) and > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of delayed, low-dose G-CSF plus chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization was feasible and provides further evidence supporting this potentially cost-effective strategy. A review of the literature supports our findings and emphasizes the need for larger studies to address this issue.

Infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate infectious complications in patients receiving mobilization chemotherapy for stem cell collection prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. An additional goal was to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of infectious complications. At the Medical College of Georgia BMT center, 54 patients were administered mobilization chemotherapy for the purpose of collecting stem cells between June, 1997, and May, 2002. All patients received Filgrastim in addition to chemotherapy, and 50 of 54 patients received prophylactic acyclovir, fluconazole, and ciprofloxacin until neutrophil recovery. The median duration to neutrophil recovery was 11 days. Fourteen of 54 (26%) patients developed fever/infections during the mobilization phase. One patient developed both a catheter-related infection and Clostridium difficile colitis, increasing the total number of infectious episodes to 15. Twelve patients had a documented site of infection whereas 2 patients had neutropenic fever with no identifiable source. Eight of the 15 (55%) infections were Gram-positive catheter infections. All the patients were treated successfully with antibiotics. No systemic fungal infections were identified and none of the patients died from complications related to mobilization chemotherapy. Logistic regression was applied for univariate and multivariate analysis and showed that age, sex, diagnosis, neutrophil recovery, disease status, use of salvage chemotherapy, and mobilization regimen used did not affect the infection rate. In our series of 54 patients, 14 patients developed fever/infections during mobilization. Although there is a substantial risk of infectious complications among patients who receive mobilization chemotherapy, it is not clear that prophylactic antibiotics decrease infectious complications. Because the vast majority of infections are Gram-positive catheter infections, it appears reasonable to employ Gram-positive prophylaxis. Controlled studies should be conducted to define the optimum mobilization regimens as well as the optimum combination of prophylactic antibiotics.

Monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts on the first day of apheresis is highly predictive for efficient CD34+ cell yield

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L, white blood cells (WBC), and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis with the yield of collected CD 34+ cell counts in 40 patients with hematological malignancies (n = 29) and solid tumors (n = 11). The median numbers of apheresis cycles, numbers of CD 34+ cells, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, and total nucleated cells collected were 2 (range, 1-4), 5.5 x 106/kg (range, 0.05-33.78), 2.59 x 108/kg (range, 0.04-20.68), and 7.36 x 108/kg (range, 0.15-28.08), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the number of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L and the yield of collected CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.962, p < 0.001). The threshold levels of PB C 34+ cell/micro L to obtain > or =1 x 106/kg and > or =2.5 x 106/kg CD 34+ cell in one collection were 12/micro L and 34/ micro L, respectively. Fifteen of 17 (88%) patients who had > or =34 CD 34+ cells/ micro L in the PB before collection reached the level of > or =2.5 x 106/kg in a single apheresis. Despite a low r value, WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis also correlated with the yield of collected daily CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.482, p < 0.01 and r = 0.496 p < 0.01, respectively). These data suggest that preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/ micro L correlated significantly better with the yield of collected CD 34+ cells than WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis. Using a value of 34/micro L preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells as a guide for the timing of peripheral blood stem cells collections can be time saving and cost-effective.

High-dose chemotherapy and CD34-selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone and/or bone marrow

Fifty women with breast cancer metastatic to bone or bone marrow involvement on light microscopy at the time of initial evaluation were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation with CD34(+) cell selection using the Isolex 300i system. All patients received induction chemotherapy. PBPC were mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The median CD34(+) progenitor purity was 94.7% (range 72-98.7%) and recovery 38.4% (range 21-60%). Forty-eight hours after HDC with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and carmustine, PBPC were reinfused. Median time to neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 9 (range 9-12) days and to platelet transfusion independence 11 (4-30) days. These data demonstrate that selected CD34(+) PBPCs allow rapid hematologic reconstitution after HDC. During follow-up, 23% of patients developed herpes zoster. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus infections. Three patients developed fungal infections. The development of these infections was not associated with steroid use but appeared more frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus. Seventy-four per cent of patients received steroids for pulmonary toxicity. Treatment-related mortality was 4%. Progression-free survival and overall survival at 35 months was 22.4% and 40.5%, with a median of 11.4 months and 15.4 months, respectively.

A phase II trial of docetaxel for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for patients with breast cancer and ovarian cancer

As docetaxel is known to have significant antineoplastic activity against breast and ovarian cancer, we explored its application as a peripheral blood stem cell mobilizing agent in 33 women with stage lll-IV ovarian carcinoma (n = 10) or stage ll-lV breast cancer (n = 23) who were in preparation for high-dose chemotherapy. Eleven patients had bone and/or bone marrow involvement with their disease. The median number of prior regimens received before mobilization was two (range 1-3). The three dose levels administered were 100 mg/m(2), 110 mg/m(2) and 120 mg/m(2). Patients received one dose of docetaxel in the outpatient setting followed by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) starting 4 days after docetaxel administration. Leukapheresis commenced when WBC >1.0 x 10(9)/l or when the WBC began to rise after reaching a nadir. Ninety-seven percent of patients began leukapheresis within 7-9 days after receiving docetaxel (range 7-10 days). The collection goal was >/=2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Twenty-seven (82%) patients reached this goal in a median of 2 leukapheresis days (range 1-3). No grade 2-4 nonhematologic toxicities were noted. Thirteen patients (55%) showed a WBC nadir >1.0 x 10(9)/l. None of the patients experienced neutropenic fever or required blood or platelet transfusion support. In conclusion, docetaxel + G-CSF is an effective, well-tolerated regimen for PBPC mobilization which can be safely administered in the outpatient setting with minimal toxicity.

PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and G-CSF with or without amifostine: results of a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of amifostine on PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus G-CSF was assessed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty patients with a median age of 34 years (range, 19-53) who had germ cell tumor were evaluated for high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 500-mg dose of amifostine (Group A, n = 20) or no amifostine (Group B, n = 20) before mobilization chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given over 3 hours and ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)) given over 24 hours (TI) on Day 1. G-CSF at 10 microg per kg per day was given subsequent to TI with or without amifostine from Day 3 until the end of leukapheresis procedures.

RESULTS

In 2 (10%) of 20 patients receiving amifostine and 3 (15%) of 20 patients not receiving it, no PBPC separation was performed because of mobilization failure. No significant differences were observed in the study arms with regard to the time from chemotherapy until first PBPC collection or the number of apheresis procedures needed to harvest more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Furthermore, leukapheresis procedures yielded comparable doses of CD34+ cells per kg (3.4 x 10(6) vs. 3.6 x 10(6); p = 0.82), MNCs per kg (2.7 x 10(8) vs. 2.6 x 10(8); p = 0.18), and CFU-GM per kg (15.9 x 10(4) vs. 19.3 x 10(4); p = 0.20). Patients in Group A had higher numbers of circulating CD34+ cells on Day 10 (103.0/microL vs. 46.8/microL; p = 0.10) and on Day 11 (63.0/microL vs.14.3/microL; p = 0.04) than did patients in Group B.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a single dose of amifostine before chemotherapy with TI mobilized higher numbers of CD34 cells in the circulation, but did not enhance the overall collection efficiency in the present trial.

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been extensively exploited as a therapeutic and research modality and has revolutionized current patient care. At present, more and more medical centers use peripheral blood progenitor cells for transplantation by mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood because of potential advantages of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation over bone-marrow transplantation. Different effective mobilization regimens have been developed recently with chemotherapeutic agents, hematopoietic growth factors or their combination. This article reviews current developments related to hematopoietic stem cell mobilization including the biology of hematopoietic stem cells, strategies for mobilization, management for mobilization failure, mechanisms of mobilization, and side effects during mobilization. Finally, the Initiation-Amplification-Emigration-Adaptation Model is proposed to help aid understanding of the mechanisms of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and to stimulate development of novel and optimal mobilization strategies for patient care.

Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Focus on Autografting

This review focuses on certain of the principles involved in high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy along with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of certain malignancies. In addition, the evidence, wherever possible based on randomized data, for the application of this approach in certain malignancies is reviewed. The malignancies highlighted include acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease, and breast cancer.

Recovery of lymphocyte and dendritic cell subsets after autologous CD34+ cell transplantation

Following high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT), there are profound changes in leukocyte homeostasis and the immune system is compromised. Transplantation of purified CD34+ cells may further compromise immune recovery because the grafts are depleted of mature immune cells. However, a detailed monitoring of immune cell reconstitution has not been done. We monitored blood levels of antigen-presenting cells (APC) and of lymphocytes by multi-color flow cytometry at different times post CD34+ PBPCT. We found a rapid normalization of circulating levels of the antigen-presenting CD11c+ dendritic cells (defined as lineage- HLA-DR+ CD11c+ cells). There was a slight over-representation of lin- DR+ CD11c- cells at day 42 post transplantation suggesting that the composition of the APC population might be affected. Normal levels of total T, B and NK lymphocytes were rapidly achieved but the composition of the T cell population was abnormal. Patients had elevated levels of CD8+ T cells at early times and a persistent reduction in levels of naive CD8+ T cells (CD8+ CD4- CD45RA+ CD27+) and of naive CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD3+ CD8- CD45RA+). Thus, we found a rapid recovery of DC after CD34+ PBPCT but the specific numerical defects in naive T cells are likely to be a major cause of immune dysfunction in the patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1249-1255.